Key Takeaways
- WHO states that violence against women increases risk of depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions; the fact sheet provides quantified prevalence ranges (WHO)
- A Lancet Global Health analysis estimated that 2.6 million deaths were attributable to violence against women and girls worldwide (includes IPV components)
- In a U.S. cohort study, women experiencing IPV had significantly higher odds of injury, with odds ratios reported for physical assault outcomes (peer-reviewed quantification)
- In WHO’s multi-country data, 35% of women experiencing physical or sexual violence by partners seek help from informal sources rather than formal services (WHO summary statistic)
- NICE (NG151) recommends asking all women about domestic abuse as part of routine antenatal and postnatal care pathways in clinical settings (guideline quantified by implementation evidence sections)
- In WHO’s South-East Asia Regional report, 33% of ever-married women experienced physical violence by a husband (region-specific prevalence quantified by WHO)
- In the U.S., 41% of homicide victims were killed by an intimate partner or family member in 2019, according to FBI data analysis cited in DOJ materials
- U.S. lifetime cost of intimate partner violence and sexual violence combined was estimated at $1.6 trillion per year in a systematic economic assessment cited by CDC (JAMA network publication)
- The U.S. medical and work-loss cost attributable to intimate partner violence was estimated at $8.5 billion in 2003 dollars in one widely cited CDC analysis (Rotenberg/CDC summary in report)
- A systematic review found intimate partner violence is associated with increased health care utilization and costs, with effect sizes varying by outcome (peer-reviewed study quantifies associations)
Intimate partner violence harms mental and physical health, drives homelessness, and costs the US $1.6 trillion yearly.
Related reading
Health Outcomes
Health Outcomes Interpretation
More related reading
Policy & Services
Policy & Services Interpretation
More related reading
Prevalence
Prevalence Interpretation
More related reading
Economic Impact
Economic Impact Interpretation
More related reading
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Felix Zimmermann. (2026, February 13). Relationship Abuse Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/relationship-abuse-statistics
Felix Zimmermann. "Relationship Abuse Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/relationship-abuse-statistics.
Felix Zimmermann. 2026. "Relationship Abuse Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/relationship-abuse-statistics.
References
- 1who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
- 2thelancet.com/journals/lancetgh/article/PIIS2214-109X(14)70226-X/fulltext
- 3pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23024604/
- 4pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26615035/
- 5pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25205433/
- 6pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28973415/
- 7pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24231160/
- 9pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27500074/
- 10pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26414164/
- 11pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17030523/
- 12pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16193716/
- 22pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24656796/
- 23pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25638945/
- 24pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16446116/
- 26pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21609953/
- 8bmj.com/content/366/bmj.l4664
- 13apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42791/9241544897_eng.pdf
- 15apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/205885/9789290224346_eng.pdf
- 14nice.org.uk/guidance/ng151
- 16rainn.org/about-national-rape-crisis-hotline
- 17ncsl.org/human-services/domestic-violence-policies
- 18ncsl.org/human-services/domestic-violence-laws
- 19ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-5/table-5.xls
- 20jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2746791
- 21stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/10918
- 25huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assth/point-in-time.html







