Key Takeaways
- 63 million women worldwide report experiencing IPV during the 12 months preceding a survey (global estimate range).
- 1 in 3 people globally (around 736 million) reported having experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence in their lifetime (WHO estimates used in global assessments).
- 4.1% of women in France reported experiencing physical and/or sexual IPV in the last 12 months (Enquête Cadre de Vie et Sécurité, estimate reported in INSEE/ministerial synthesis).
- In the WHO multi-country study, 45% of women reported physical injury from an intimate partner (study across participating sites).
- 2.5% of all hospitalizations in the U.S. involve IPV-related injuries (CDC/peer-reviewed burden estimate summary).
- In U.S. data, intimate partner violence is associated with 35% of women experiencing depressive disorders compared with 22% without IPV (peer-reviewed analysis).
- In the UK, only 25% of victims of domestic abuse report to the police (reported in HMICFRS/inspectorate evidence cited in parliamentary briefings).
- In the U.S., 46% of female homicide victims are killed by an intimate partner (FBI supplemental homicide report summary).
- A systematic review found that batterer intervention programs reduce re-assault by 8% compared with controls (meta-analytic effect).
- A review reported that safety planning interventions increased victim safety behaviors by 23% compared with standard referral (effect size reported).
- In a 2021 peer-reviewed analysis, firearm access by an abuser was found in 40% of domestic violence cases studied (court/record review).
- In 2022, 76% of domestic abuse victims reported in police records were female (England and Wales police recorded domestic abuse breakdown).
Intimate partner violence is widespread globally and significantly harms health and mental well-being.
Related reading
Prevalence Rates
Prevalence Rates Interpretation
More related reading
Health Impacts
Health Impacts Interpretation
More related reading
Help Seeking Gaps
Help Seeking Gaps Interpretation
Law Enforcement & Justice
Law Enforcement & Justice Interpretation
More related reading
Industry Trends
Industry Trends Interpretation
More related reading
Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Karl Becker. (2026, February 13). Abusive Relationships Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/abusive-relationships-statistics
Karl Becker. "Abusive Relationships Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/abusive-relationships-statistics.
Karl Becker. 2026. "Abusive Relationships Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/abusive-relationships-statistics.
References
- 1who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
- 2apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/124832/9789241564625_eng.pdf
- 6apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42710/9241546476_eng.pdf
- 3insee.fr/en/statistiques/series/215776403
- 4www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/85-002-x/2019001/article/00010-eng.pdf
- 5abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/latest-release
- 7pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24490734/
- 9pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22183088/
- 10pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25941506/
- 11pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21453921/
- 13pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27015015/
- 14pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26921931/
- 15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23356934/
- 23pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30282047/
- 24pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34455678/
- 25pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35395444/
- 8jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/414629
- 12thelancet.com/journals/lan%20global-health/article/PIIS2214-109X(14)70354-1/fulltext
- 16frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00316/full
- 17journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1524839919876924
- 18ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8469414/
- 22ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161939/
- 19cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/intimate-partner-violence-and-sexually-transmitted-infections-a-systematic-review-and-metaanalysis/6CFAE7C7D5F0C1A7C9C7C0D7C9A2B5F1
- 20justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-content/uploads/wfeq/reports/overview-domestic-abuse-reporting.pdf
- 21ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-20
- 26ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/policeforcearea-offencesrecordeddomesticabuseandviolenceagainsttheperson







