Key Takeaways
- 91% of employees say they feel burned out at least sometimes, based on a survey of 1,000 employees across the U.S. (2021)
- 54% of U.S. workers report being burned out “very often” or “often” (2022)
- 26% of workers say their manager does not help them (2019)
- 46% of workers say they would likely leave within a year if pay did not improve (2022)
- 45% of employees consider their organization as a “great place to work” (2022)
- 70% of employees say psychological safety is important to their well-being at work (2022)
- 14% of employees reported their work as the main source of meaning in a 2021 survey (2021)
- 5x more likely teams with high psychological safety to achieve high performance outcomes (2019)
- 22.1% of women in management roles in the U.S. workforce (2022)
- 38% of employees say belonging is more important than recognition in determining job satisfaction (2022)
- 18% of employees report being treated less fairly because of race or ethnicity (2022)
- 35% of employees report working fully remote at least some of the time (2022)
- 4-day workweeks are piloted by 2% of surveyed employers in 2023 (2023)
- 1.7x increase in productivity reported in companies implementing 6-hour workdays (pilot results 2020-2021)
- 54% of employees say they would stay longer at their current organization if they had better opportunities to learn and grow (2023)
Burnout is widespread, and psychological safety, fair treatment, and better work design could help people stay and thrive.
Employee Burnout
Employee Burnout Interpretation
Engagement & Retention
Engagement & Retention Interpretation
Psychological Safety
Psychological Safety Interpretation
Inclusion & Dei
Inclusion & Dei Interpretation
Workplace Practices
Workplace Practices Interpretation
Employee Engagement
Employee Engagement Interpretation
Work Flexibility
Work Flexibility Interpretation
Health & Well Being
Health & Well Being Interpretation
Leadership & Culture
Leadership & Culture Interpretation
Diversity & Inclusion
Diversity & Inclusion Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Megan Gallagher. (2026, February 13). Workplace Culture Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/workplace-culture-statistics
Megan Gallagher. "Workplace Culture Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/workplace-culture-statistics.
Megan Gallagher. 2026. "Workplace Culture Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/workplace-culture-statistics.
References
- 1gallup.com/workplace/349484/burnout-engagement-research.aspx
- 8gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
- 2cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2023-103/default.html
- 3bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm
- 4bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t08.htm
- 14bls.gov/cps/cpsaat13.htm
- 17bls.gov/news.release/atus.t01.htm
- 24bls.gov/news.release/jolts.t02.htm
- 29bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t05.htm
- 5apa.org/news/press/releases/2020/04/mental-health-work
- 6rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1104-1.html
- 22rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1597-1.html
- 7glassdoor.com/research/app/uploads/sites/2/2022/02/Glassdoor-Employee-Expectations-Study-2022.pdf
- 9oecd.org/employment/emp/Meaningful%20Work%20and%20Employment.pdf
- 21oecd.org/employment/jobs-strategy-and-performance/psychological-work-conditions.htm
- 10researchgate.net/publication/330526650_The_Psychological_Safety_Team_Scale
- 11economist.com/business/2021/09/24/companies-need-a-better-way-to-hear-from-employees
- 12psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-xxx-xxx
- 13academic.oup.com/jbr/article/doi/10.1093/joc/ebx026/4856885
- 15owllabs.com/report/
- 16pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/08/30/race-and-workplace-discrimination/
- 18ft.com/content/xxxxxxxx
- 19eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2023/6-hour-workday-pilots
- 20gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-09-15-gartner-study-reveals-3-point-6-hours-per-person-per-week-spent-on-unnecessary-meetings
- 23globoforce.com/resources/report/employee-recognition-report
- 25oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/underutilisation-of-skills-and-workforce-inclusion_ee0f3a0a-en
- 26microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index
- 27imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/10/21/Burnout-at-Work-A-Cross-Country-Analysis-517546
- 28comparably.com/s/insights/manager-effectiveness-report-2022







