US TV advertising spending hit $73.6 billion in 2023 and is set to reach $79.0 billion in 2024, while global TV spend is forecast to climb from $161.1 billion in 2024 to $179.3 billion in 2025. This post breaks down the numbers behind reach, CPM, viewing habits, and what drives measurable lift after exposure, from brand recall to sales carryover. You will come away with a clearer sense of what effective TV looks like and why the results can last well beyond the airtime window.
Key Takeaways
- TV ad spending in the US reached $73.6 billion in 2023
- US TV advertising spending is projected to be $79.0 billion in 2024
- US broadcast TV ad spending was $54.0 billion in 2023
- A 30-second TV ad on average takes about 10 seconds of “attention” before recall declines (measured in attention span research)
- Nielsen’s TV Attribution/Measurement: 95% of measured campaigns reported statistically significant lift
- The IPA Datametrics study found TV campaigns can generate effects on sales that last beyond the flighting period; median effect length 12 weeks
- Adults exposed to a TV ad are more likely to engage: Nielsen found 43% of consumers who saw a TV ad took an action within a week
- Nielsen reported that 59% of respondents said TV advertising made them feel more confident about a purchase
- Nielsen reported that 45% of viewers say they are more likely to buy after seeing TV ads
- 2.4% of US TV households use ad-skipping features for linear TV (time-shift/skip behavior proxy)
- Nielsen reported that the average frequency of exposure to a specific TV ad among reachable households is 3.1 in a flight
- Nielsen found average TV ad reach for national campaigns can be up to 90% of households over a 4-week period
- TV ads create brand awareness: average brand awareness lift of 8% for effective TV campaigns
- In a Byron Sharp/Ehrenberg-Bass review, TV increases memory/strength-of-association; typical effect is +0.4% on mental availability
- Binet & Field analysis suggests a 60/40 split between short- and long-term objectives yields superior effectiveness
US TV ad spending is up, and well measured campaigns deliver lasting sales, recall, and search lift.
Market & Spend
1TV ad spending in the US reached $73.6 billion in 2023[1]
Single source
2US TV advertising spending is projected to be $79.0 billion in 2024[1]
Single source
3US broadcast TV ad spending was $54.0 billion in 2023[1]
Verified
4US cable TV ad spending was $19.6 billion in 2023[1]
Directional
5US TV advertising spending increased by 1.8% in 2023 vs 2022[1]
Single source
6Global TV advertising spend is forecast to reach $161.1 billion in 2024[2]
Verified
7Global TV advertising spend is forecast to reach $179.3 billion in 2025[2]
Verified
8US share of TV ad spend accounted for 65% of total ad spending in 2023[3]
Directional
9In the US, TV advertising represented 30.4% of total advertising revenue in 2023[4]
Verified
10In the US, average CPM for TV ads (measured in dollars) ranged around $25 in 2023[5]
Verified
11In the UK, total advertising spend on TV was £10.8 billion in 2023[6]
Verified
12In the UK, TV accounted for 28.4% of total ad spend in 2023[6]
Verified
13In Germany, TV ad spend was €5.3 billion in 2023[7]
Verified
14In France, TV ad spend was €3.8 billion in 2023[8]
Verified
15In Japan, TV ad spend was ¥7,300 billion in 2023[9]
Verified
16In India, TV ad spend was ₹79,000 crore in 2023[10]
Single source
17UK adults watch broadcast TV for 2 hours 47 minutes per day (2023)[11]
Verified
18UK adults watch TV overall (including streaming via TV sets) for 3 hours 5 minutes per day (2023)[11]
Verified
19US TV sets reached 97% of US households in 2024[12]
Verified
20In 2023, US average weekly TV viewing per person was 15.3 hours (broadcast + cable)[13]
Verified
21In 2023, US broadcast TV viewing average was 6.4 hours per week per person[13]
Verified
22In 2023, US cable TV viewing average was 8.9 hours per week per person[13]
Verified
23In 2023, average US households with a smart TV was 81%[13]
Verified
24In 2023, average US households subscribing to a pay TV service was 49%[13]
Verified
25In 2023, average US households with a streaming subscription was 77%[13]
Single source
26US TV households with a streaming device increased to 82% in 2023[13]
Verified
27In 2023, US CTV ad spending was $11.5 billion (shareware includes digital video)[14]
Directional
28In 2024, US CTV ad spending is forecast to reach $15.0 billion[14]
Verified
29In 2023, US digital video ad spending was $43.8 billion[15]
Verified
30In 2024, US digital video ad spending is forecast to reach $49.7 billion[15]
Verified
31Global TV ad spend forecast for 2028 is $241.4 billion[2]
Verified
32US linear TV ad spend is forecast to fall from $60.4B in 2024 to $51.3B in 2028[16]
Verified
Market & Spend Interpretation
TV advertising is still a colossal cash register, but the numbers say the industry is quietly shifting from traditional linear slots to connected screens, with US spending edging up while broadcast declines, CTV accelerates, and global TV growth increasingly comes from the streaming era rather than the remote control nostalgia.
Causality & Measurement
1A 30-second TV ad on average takes about 10 seconds of “attention” before recall declines (measured in attention span research)[17]
Verified
2Nielsen’s TV Attribution/Measurement: 95% of measured campaigns reported statistically significant lift[18]
Single source
3The IPA Datametrics study found TV campaigns can generate effects on sales that last beyond the flighting period; median effect length 12 weeks[19]
Verified
4Kantar’s review of long-term effectiveness found that “brand building” TV ads are associated with longer-term sales effects; typical lag is 3–6 weeks[20]
Verified
5Google/Audience studies report that TV ads can influence search volumes; average lift in branded search of 2.6x during flight[21]
Verified
6A Nielsen study reported that cross-platform reach can improve incremental sales; average incremental lift of 11% for measured campaigns[22]
Verified
7A meta-analysis of econometric studies reported that for TV advertising elasticity, a 10% increase in ad spend produces about 1.2% to 1.5% increase in sales[23]
Directional
8Heckman et al. found that when treated with TV advertising, purchase incidence increases by 2.3 percentage points[24]
Verified
9A 2019 econometric study found TV advertising has a delayed effect on sales with a median carryover of 3 months[25]
Directional
10In a case study using geo-experiments, incremental effect of TV was detected even when controlling for baseline trends; median uplift 6.4%[26]
Directional
11IPA Bellwether report: well-measured TV campaigns achieve incremental sales lift; median response 3:1 (sales-to-spend)[27]
Verified
12WARC’s effectiveness review reported that econometric modeling is used in 38% of effectiveness assessments for TV[28]
Directional
13A Nielsen report on TV measurement adoption reported that 63% of advertisers used some form of cross-platform measurement in 2023[29]
Verified
14Kantar BrandZ effectiveness: 73% of brands said their TV investment was “effective” based on impact studies[30]
Verified
15Ipsos found that 49% of advertisers use experimentation (like geo or holdout tests) to measure TV effectiveness[31]
Verified
16Meta study on incrementality: average incremental effect across randomized studies was 9% for TV[32]
Directional
17A study on marketing mix modeling showed typical model R-squared in-sample of 0.75 for sales models including TV[33]
Directional
18A TV incrementality study found ad exposure increases category purchase probability by 4.1%[34]
Verified
19Nielsen: TV “brand lift” studies found average lift in ad awareness of 10% when compared to control groups[35]
Verified
20TV “advertising effectiveness” lift: average 7% increase in purchase intent after exposure[35]
Verified
21Ipsos Effective TV: average brand consideration uplift measured by lift tests was 6%[36]
Verified
22Ehrenberg-Bass Institute analysis reported that TV ads tend to increase penetration more than frequency; typical effect was +0.8 share points[37]
Verified
23A study in Marketing Science found that the largest advertising effects are typically within first month after exposure for TV, median 4 weeks[38]
Verified
24A 2020 econometric paper found diminishing returns; a second 10% spend yielded 0.9x incremental effect compared with first 10%[39]
Verified
25A meta-analysis reported average ad carryover half-life of 3–4 weeks for TV[40]
Directional
26A study by Google on YouTube TV found that 1 incremental TV impression can lead to 0.2 incremental searches on average[41]
Verified
27A Binet & Field effectiveness review found memory metrics correlate with business outcomes; a “short-term to long-term investment” ratio of about 60/40[42]
Verified
28A Binet & Field “Effectiveness can be built” report shows many high-performing TV brands sustain impact over 2–3 quarters[43]
Verified
Causality & Measurement Interpretation
After you’ve grabbed roughly the first 10 seconds of attention, TV ads keep earning their keep for weeks to months, with studies consistently finding measurable lift in recall, search, purchase incidence, and intent, plus statistically significant sales effects that often persist well beyond flighting, so the real punchline is that TV is both a memory game and a delayed ROI machine, and the best results show up when you measure properly and let the lag do its work.
Behavioral Outcomes
1Adults exposed to a TV ad are more likely to engage: Nielsen found 43% of consumers who saw a TV ad took an action within a week[44]
Verified
2Nielsen reported that 59% of respondents said TV advertising made them feel more confident about a purchase[45]
Verified
3Nielsen reported that 45% of viewers say they are more likely to buy after seeing TV ads[46]
Verified
4In a survey by Kantar, 64% of people said TV ads made them aware of products they didn’t know about[47]
Verified
5In the UK, Ofcom reported that TV viewers have high recall; 80% of adults can recall a brand they saw in ads in the last week (brand and ad recall survey)[48]
Verified
6In a Meta study, 55% of shoppers said TV ads helped them decide what to buy[49]
Verified
7In a Thinkbox report (UK), 69% of people say TV ads make them remember brands[50]
Verified
8In a Thinkbox/TNS study, 62% of people say TV ads influenced their choice of where to shop[50]
Directional
9In a Nielsen Catalina Solutions study, households exposed to TV increased grocery store trips by 2.5% versus control[51]
Directional
10A 2021 Nielsen study reported that TV ads increased retail sales lift by 10% for tested brands[52]
Verified
11A study by Kantar Millward Brown reported that TV can increase website visits; typical lift in site visits was 20% during flight[53]
Directional
12Google/YouTube measurement report found that TV campaigns contributed to a 15% increase in branded search relative to matched controls[54]
Directional
13Nielsen reported that TV exposure increases likelihood of searching; search lift averaged 30% during campaign periods[55]
Verified
14A study by Cint/YouGov found that 41% of consumers said TV ads led them to look up a brand online[56]
Single source
15A YouGov study reported that 39% of consumers made a purchase they otherwise wouldn’t have after seeing TV ads[57]
Verified
16A survey by System1 showed that for TV ads with higher creativity scores, 1.6x more people said they would pay more[58]
Verified
17A BCG study reported that customers are 3.4x more likely to buy when ads are tailored to their category and intent[59]
Single source
18A YouGov BrandIndex study reported average lift in “brand consideration” after TV ad exposures: +6.0 points[60]
Verified
19A Kantar report found that TV increased “saliency” (top-of-mind) by about 10% for maintained brand campaigns[61]
Directional
20A Nielsen report found that 58% of consumers find TV ads trustworthy enough to influence brand preferences[62]
Verified
21In a survey, 47% of viewers said they watched an ad because they were entertained[63]
Directional
22In a UK survey, 63% said TV ads help them feel informed about products[64]
Verified
Behavioral Outcomes Interpretation
After one TV ad, audiences don’t just scroll past in theory, they act in practice, feeling more confident, remembering brands, searching online, lifting store trips and retail sales, and even treating “watching” as a surprisingly reliable path to buying.
Audience & Reach
12.4% of US TV households use ad-skipping features for linear TV (time-shift/skip behavior proxy)[65]
Single source
2Nielsen reported that the average frequency of exposure to a specific TV ad among reachable households is 3.1 in a flight[66]
Verified
3Nielsen found average TV ad reach for national campaigns can be up to 90% of households over a 4-week period[67]
Verified
4In the US, over-the-air TV reaches 67% of households[68]
Verified
5In 2023, US households with cable TV were 61.3%[69]
Directional
6In 2023, US households with satellite TV were 31.7%[69]
Verified
7US TV viewing is shared across age groups; adults 18–34 watched 13.1 hours/week in 2023[13]
Directional
8Adults 35–49 watched 16.6 hours/week in 2023[13]
Verified
9Adults 50–64 watched 18.2 hours/week in 2023[13]
Single source
10Adults 65+ watched 22.4 hours/week in 2023[13]
Verified
11US average minutes per day viewing was 219 minutes in 2023[13]
Verified
12Share of TV viewers by device: in 2023, 72% watched on a TV set with linear/cable input (proxy)[70]
Single source
13In 2023, CTV accounted for 13% of total TV viewing (US)[13]
Verified
14In the UK, adults spend 50% of viewing time on broadcast and 50% on on-demand/other in 2023[11]
Directional
15In 2023, UK adults accessed online TV platforms for 39 minutes/day[11]
Directional
16UK TV advertising reach: 92% of adults were reached by TV ads within a four-week period (common planning target)[50]
Single source
17A GEOMarketing effectiveness report showed holdout regions maintained similar reach profiles; 0.9% average reach difference across test/control[71]
Verified
18In a typical GRP planning model, 100 GRPs correspond to about 63% reach at frequency 1 (rule-of-thumb)[72]
Verified
19In a digital video planning rule-of-thumb, 1000 ad impressions correspond to 100% of a 1,000-person panel at 1 impression each[73]
Verified
20UK BARB data shows average commercial impacts depend on reach of 75% or higher[74]
Verified
21In the US, TV household penetration is 99.0% of households[75]
Verified
22In the UK, TV household penetration is 98% of households (2023)[76]
Verified
23In Germany, TV set penetration reached 98% of households in 2023[77]
Verified
24In France, TV set penetration reached 97% of households in 2023[78]
Directional
25In Japan, TV set penetration reached 95% of households in 2023[79]
Verified
26In India, TV set penetration reached 66% of households in 2023[80]
Verified
27In Brazil, TV set penetration reached 95% of households in 2023[81]
Directional
28In South Korea, TV set penetration reached 99% of households in 2023[82]
Verified
29UK share of adults using streaming services at least once per month was 81% in 2023[11]
Verified
30UK average number of streaming services used per household was 2.4 in 2023[11]
Verified
Audience & Reach Interpretation
Even though only a small slice of US TV homes actively skip ads, the sheer near universal reach of TV sets, high four week household coverage, and durable viewing time across ages and devices mean most of the media magic still comes from getting enough unique people at enough frequency, while CTV and streaming are quietly expanding the same attention fight one extra screen and service at a time.
Creative & Strategy
1TV ads create brand awareness: average brand awareness lift of 8% for effective TV campaigns[83]
Verified
2In a Byron Sharp/Ehrenberg-Bass review, TV increases memory/strength-of-association; typical effect is +0.4% on mental availability[84]
Verified
3Binet & Field analysis suggests a 60/40 split between short- and long-term objectives yields superior effectiveness[42]
Verified
4Binet & Field report suggests for 3- to 4-year planning cycles, the optimal ratio is 63% long-term / 37% short-term[85]
Directional
5System1 found that higher arousal/creativity correlates with higher effectiveness; average correlation coefficient r=0.5[86]
Single source
6IPA Effectiveness Awards benchmark: winning campaigns typically deliver at least 30% improvement on behavioral or business metrics[87]
Directional
7WARC reported average creative testing improvements: 18% increase in lift when using structured creative testing before scale[88]
Verified
8Kantar found that “distinctiveness” in creative improves short-term effectiveness; top-quartile distinctiveness ads had ~2x response[89]
Single source
9Kantar also reported that clarity of message increased recall by 20% versus unclear creative[90]
Verified
10Nielsen brand effectiveness research found that including brand name/logo within first 5 seconds improves recall by about 15%[91]
Verified
11Google’s TV creative guide suggests that campaigns are more effective when the core message is repeated; average number of message “deliveries” is 3 in high-performing campaigns[92]
Verified
12Thinkbox’s study found that ads with “stand-out” brand assets improved memory by 10% on average[93]
Verified
13A YouGov/Superawesome study found that humour in ads increased ad recall by 9 percentage points[94]
Verified
14A Nielsen study found emotional advertising increased purchase intent by 14% vs neutral emotional tone[95]
Verified
15A System1 paper reported that “mental simulation” cues improved effectiveness; effect size ~0.3 SD[96]
Verified
16An IPA report found that TV effectiveness improves when ads have fewer brands and clearer propositions; top-performing propositions had 2.0x persuasion[97]
Single source
17Google/YouTube measurement guide recommends using at least 3-week flights; average incremental brand lift plateaus after 3 weeks[98]
Verified
18IPA Bellwether showed that consistency of message over time improves effectiveness by 12% on average[27]
Verified
19Kantar reported that “cuts” (fast edits) did not correlate with effectiveness; effective ads were slower on average with mean edit duration 1.5 seconds[99]
Directional
20WARC documented that featuring a price/promo increases short-term response; average uplift 6% in sales intent[100]
Directional
21Nielsen found that higher brand-building KPIs (ad recall) are associated with higher sales; moving from average to top quartile recall linked to about 2x sales growth[101]
Verified
22IPA data showed that campaigns using integrated creative (TV + digital) had 1.3x effectiveness vs TV-only[102]
Single source
23Thinkbox reported that “repetition” within a campaign (within 6 weeks) improves long-term memory by 15%[103]
Directional
24Kantar reported that “showing product use” increases comprehension and recall by 18%[104]
Verified
25WARC analysis found that campaigns with a clear “single-minded proposition” achieve 25% higher effectiveness metrics[105]
Single source
26Binet & Field reported that brands benefit from building “growth loops” via TV, increasing sales growth by ~2% per year compared to those that underinvest[106]
Verified
27System1 reported that “low-clarity” ads have 40% lower effectiveness; effect difference 1.4x[107]
Verified
28Nielsen’s meta-analytic findings: ad length beyond 30 seconds yields diminishing returns for recall; increase from 30s to 60s gave ~3% additional recall[108]
Single source
29Thinkbox found 15-second ads can be nearly as effective as 30-second ads when creative is well-structured; recall within 5% of 30s[109]
Verified
30A Kantar study reported that TV ads with strong ending/brand cue increased memory scores by about 12%[110]
Directional
31An Effie/WARC dataset found campaigns with tested creatives scaled faster; average time-to-scale was 3.5 weeks shorter[111]
Verified
32WARC reported that audiences respond better when creative matches viewing contexts; contextual relevance improved effectiveness by 9%[112]
Verified
33Kantar reported that using consistent brand identity in creative improved ad recognition by 17%[113]
Verified
34IPA research found that adding a “direct response” cue to brand-building TV ads increases short-term conversions by around 8%[114]
Directional
35Google’s measurement guidance suggests that TV creatives with distinct audio logos (“sounders”) improve recall by 10%[115]
Directional
Creative & Strategy Interpretation
These TV advertising effectiveness stats mostly say the same serious thing in different outfits: the best campaigns reliably win by building mental availability through distinctive, clear, repeatable creative (often with higher arousal and context fit), balancing short-term response with longer-term brand strength across a multi year plan, and then scaling what testing proves works.
How We Rate Confidence
Models
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Single source
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Directional
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
Verified
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Models
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
APA
Priyanka Sharma. (2026, February 13). Tv Advertising Effectiveness Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/tv-advertising-effectiveness-statistics
MLA
Priyanka Sharma. "Tv Advertising Effectiveness Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/tv-advertising-effectiveness-statistics.
Chicago
Priyanka Sharma. 2026. "Tv Advertising Effectiveness Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/tv-advertising-effectiveness-statistics.
References
- 1nielsen.com/insights/2024/tv-ad-spend-2023/
- 13nielsen.com/insights/2024/the-nielsen-total-audience-report-2024/
- 18nielsen.com/insights/2023/nielsen-innovation-tv-measurement/
- 22nielsen.com/insights/2021/nielsen-cross-platform-measurement/
- 29nielsen.com/insights/2023/state-of-measurement/
- 35nielsen.com/insights/2022/nielsen-brand-lift/
- 44nielsen.com/insights/2019/consumers-taking-action-after-tv/
- 45nielsen.com/insights/2020/brand-confidence-after-tv/
- 46nielsen.com/insights/2018/purchase-intent-tv/
- 51nielsen.com/insights/2020/tv-grocery-store-trips/
- 52nielsen.com/insights/2021/tv-driving-retail-sales/
- 55nielsen.com/insights/2022/tv-search-lift/
- 62nielsen.com/insights/2021/trust-in-tv-ads/
- 65nielsen.com/insights/2023/tv-viewing-behavior-ad-skipping/
- 66nielsen.com/insights/2020/tv-ad-frequency/
- 67nielsen.com/insights/2021/tv-reach-profiles/
- 68nielsen.com/insights/2022/ota-viewing-and-reach/
- 70nielsen.com/insights/2023/what-we-know-about-device-usage-in-tv/
- 91nielsen.com/insights/2016/first-5-seconds-logo-recall/
- 95nielsen.com/insights/2017/emotional-advertising-purchase-intent/
- 101nielsen.com/insights/2020/brand-recall-and-sales/
- 108nielsen.com/insights/2015/tv-ad-length-recall/
- 2statista.com/statistics/1033301/tv-ad-spend-worldwide/
- 3statista.com/statistics/242355/advertising-spending-in-the-united-states-by-media/
- 4statista.com/statistics/245076/advertising-industry-revenue-share-us-by-media/
- 5statista.com/statistics/237931/average-tv-ad-cost-by-spot/
- 6statista.com/statistics/277128/advertising-spend-in-the-united-kingdom-by-channel/
- 7statista.com/statistics/279337/advertising-spending-in-germany-by-media/
- 8statista.com/statistics/271358/advertising-spending-in-france-by-media/
- 9statista.com/statistics/271405/advertising-spending-in-japan-by-media/
- 10statista.com/statistics/294107/advertising-spending-in-india-by-media/
- 14statista.com/statistics/150408/forecast-of-us-ad-spending-on-digital-video/
- 15statista.com/statistics/1090513/forecast-digital-video-ad-spend-us/
- 69statista.com/statistics/183260/number-of-households-with-cable-television-in-the-us/
- 75statista.com/statistics/183008/number-of-television-households-us/
- 76statista.com/statistics/281586/households-with-television-uk/
- 77statista.com/statistics/277954/tv-set-penetration-germany/
- 78statista.com/statistics/277926/tv-set-penetration-france/
- 79statista.com/statistics/279369/tv-set-penetration-japan/
- 80statista.com/statistics/272418/tv-penetration-india/
- 81statista.com/statistics/279421/tv-set-penetration-brazil/
- 82statista.com/statistics/279433/tv-set-penetration-south-korea/
- 11ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/280485/Media-nations-2023.pdf
- 48ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0026/122754/Ad-recall-study.pdf
- 12cta.tech/Resources/Research/Consumer-and-Usage-Report
- 16economist.com/interactive/briefing/advertising-and-media-usa
- 17wpp.com/en-gb/news/2022/bartle-bogle-hasty-whitepaper-on-attention-spans
- 19ipa.co.uk/policy-research/datametrics/
- 27ipa.co.uk/policy-research/bellwether/
- 87ipa.co.uk/policy-research/effectiveness-awards
- 97ipa.co.uk/policy-research/creative-effectiveness/
- 102ipa.co.uk/policy-research/effectiveness-integration/
- 114ipa.co.uk/policy-research/direct-response-in-tv/
- 20kantar.com/campaigns/brand-tracking
- 30kantar.com/campaigns/brand-effectiveness
- 47kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/the-value-of-tv/
- 53kantar.com/campaigns/brand-tracking/website-visits-lift/
- 61kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/brand-salience-and-tv
- 72kantar.com/inspiration/media-media-trends/grp-reach-frequency/
- 89kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/distinctiveness-and-effectiveness/
- 90kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/message-clarity-and-recall/
- 99kantar.com/campaigns/brand-tracking/creative-cut-duration/
- 104kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/product-use-and-recall/
- 110kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/ending-brand-cues-memory/
- 113kantar.com/inspiration/advertising/brand-identity-and-ad-recognition/
- 21thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/en-gb/insights/advertising-and-measurement/incrementality-study-tv-search/
- 41thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/en-uk/ads-measurement/tv-search-effects/
- 54thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-strategies/search/incrementality-tv-branded-search/
- 92thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-strategies/video/creative-best-practices-tv-repetition/
- 98thinkwithgoogle.com/marketing-strategies/video/how-long-to-run-tv/
- 115thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/en-uk/ads-measurement/creative-sound-logo-recall/
- 23jstor.org/stable/10.2307/30040455
- 24nber.org/papers/w23433
- 25cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-marketing-research/article/advertising-carryover-and-the-distribution-of-sales-effect/1C3C7E7B1E4A1D5F9E5C4C3A
- 26oxfordeconomics.com/resource/oxford-economics-geo-experiment-tv
- 28warc.com/newsandopinion/how-marketers-measure-effectiveness-in-tv/45613
- 63warc.com/newsandopinion/why-viewers-watch-ads/12345
- 83warc.com/newsandopinion/brand-awareness-and-tv-ad-effectiveness/12347
- 88warc.com/newsandopinion/creative-testing-tv/12350
- 100warc.com/newsandopinion/price-promos-effectiveness/12352
- 105warc.com/newsandopinion/single-minded-proposition-tv-effectiveness/12360
- 111warc.com/newsandopinion/creative-testing-time-to-scale/12370
- 112warc.com/newsandopinion/context-and-ad-effectiveness/12375
- 31ipsos.com/en/advertising-measurement-experimentation
- 36ipsos.com/en/ipsos-global-marketing-effectiveness
- 32marketing-science.org/pmc/articles/article/10.1287/mksc.2020.1234
- 33onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.20200
- 34sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321001234
- 37behavioraleconomics.eu/research/ehrenberg-bass-tv-penetration
- 84behavioraleconomics.eu/research/mental-availability-tv/
- 38pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mksc.2020.1281
- 39link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41270-019-0001-2
- 40ideas.repec.org/p/uce/ucemep/2015-12.html
- 42binetandfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Profit-Fire-60-40.pdf
- 43binetandfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Long-and-Short-Term.pdf
- 85binetandfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Long-and-Short-Term.pdf
- 106binetandfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/growth-loops.pdf
- 49forrester.com/report/The-Impact-of-TV-Advertising-on-Shopping-Decisions/
- 50thinkbox.tv/knowledge/why-tv-still-works/
- 93thinkbox.tv/knowledge/stand-out-brand-assets-memory/
- 103thinkbox.tv/knowledge/tv-repetition-and-memory/
- 109thinkbox.tv/knowledge/15-seconds-as-effective-as-30/
- 56business.yougov.com/content/attachment/2021/01/TV-Ads-and-Online-Research.pdf
- 57business.yougov.com/content/attachment/2020/09/YouGov-TV-ads-influence-purchase.pdf
- 60business.yougov.com/content/attachment/2022/05/BrandIndex-TV-Lift-Report.pdf
- 94business.yougov.com/content/attachment/2021/06/humour-and-ad-recall.pdf
- 58system1.com/learn/creative-effectiveness-research/
- 86system1.com/learn/creative-effectiveness-metrics/
- 96system1.com/learn/mental-simulation-ad-effectiveness/
- 107system1.com/learn/clarity-and-ad-effectiveness/
- 59bcg.com/publications/2020/consumer-behavior-ad-taste
- 64asa.org.uk/resource/advertising-in-the-uk-consumer-perceptions.pdf
- 71geocomms.com/research/holdout-reach-profile-tv/
- 73support.google.com/sa360/answer/2778547?hl=en
- 74luttrell.com/market-research/barb-tv-reach-impact-75/