Key Takeaways
- 1 in 3 women (35%) worldwide have experienced either physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence or non-partner sexual violence in their lifetime
- 18% of women in the WHO Multi-country Study reported experiencing physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence in the past 12 months
- 7.6% of men reported experiencing intimate partner violence (physical and/or sexual) in the past 12 months
- 76% of victims of intimate partner violence did not call the police during the incident
- 21% of women who were injured by an intimate partner received medical attention for their injuries
- 51% of teen dating violence victims did not seek help from formal support services
- $8.3 billion annual estimated cost of rape and sexual assault in the United States (2013 dollars)
- 14% of adult women who were injured by an intimate partner reported that the injury was severe
- 33% of women with intimate partner violence had injuries requiring medical treatment
- 1 in 10 adolescent girls report having experienced physical or sexual violence from a partner
- Substance misuse is present in about 37% of intimate partner violence incidents (systematic review estimate)
- Antisocial personality traits are associated with an increased likelihood of intimate partner violence (meta-analysis effect estimate)
- In the 2021 CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 10% of U.S. high school students reported being electronically harassed/abused by a dating partner (e.g., threats, controlling messages)
- MPOWER (a bystander intervention program) showed a 70% increase in bystander intervention intentions immediately post-training in a controlled study
- A meta-analysis of dating violence prevention programs found an overall effect size of d = 0.19 on reducing dating violence outcomes
One in three women experience dating or intimate partner violence, yet most victims never report it.
Related reading
Prevalence & Incidence
Prevalence & Incidence Interpretation
Reporting & Response
Reporting & Response Interpretation
More related reading
Economic & Health Costs
Economic & Health Costs Interpretation
Trends & Risk Factors
Trends & Risk Factors Interpretation
More related reading
Prevention & Programs
Prevention & Programs Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Ryan Townsend. (2026, February 13). Dating Abuse Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/dating-abuse-statistics
Ryan Townsend. "Dating Abuse Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/dating-abuse-statistics.
Ryan Townsend. 2026. "Dating Abuse Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/dating-abuse-statistics.
References
- 1who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
- 2who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564625
- 3who.int/publications/i/item/9789241563512
- 4ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985647/
- 7ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3477030/
- 9ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786364/
- 10ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666777/
- 11ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5222795/
- 12ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404004/
- 13ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4123173/
- 14ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799561/
- 15ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344061/
- 16ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508805/
- 19ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977788/
- 22ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321571/
- 25ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5024431/
- 26ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423631/
- 27ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312977/
- 28ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508915/
- 29ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786780/
- 30ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8104571/
- 5ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/249736.pdf
- 6cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5308a1.htm
- 21cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6901a1.htm
- 24cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/ss/ss7101a1.htm
- 8advocacynow.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/barriers_to_reporting_report.pdf
- 17unfpa.org/publications/state-world-population-2019
- 18sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213419305965
- 20journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1524838019872560
- 23journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122420925505







