GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Email Testing Software of 2026
Discover top tools for phishing email testing to strengthen security. Compare features and pick the best for your needs.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Egress Phishing
Phishing simulation reporting combined with user “report phishing” capture and analytics dashboards
Built for organizations needing managed phishing simulations and user reporting behavior measurement.
KnowBe4
Phish Alert Button integration that measures user reporting behavior during simulations
Built for organizations running continuous phishing drills with structured remediation workflows.
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Attack Simulation Training campaigns with click-based training and automated remediation workflows
Built for teams using Microsoft 365 that need realistic phishing simulation and training measurement.
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates phishing email testing tools that simulate real inbox threats and measure employee response. It covers platforms such as Egress Phishing, KnowBe4, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Sophos Phish Threat, and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training, highlighting how each supports campaign creation, delivery controls, reporting, and remediation workflows.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Egress Phishing Egress phishing simulation sends test emails to measure susceptibility and improves reporting workflows with automated feedback loops. | security awareness | 8.6/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 |
| 2 | KnowBe4 KnowBe4 runs phishing email campaigns with templates, targeted simulations, and reporting and training integrations. | security awareness | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 3 | Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training Microsoft Defender attack simulation training delivers phishing simulations inside Microsoft 365 and collects metrics on click and report rates. | microsoft-integrated | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 4 | Sophos Phish Threat Sophos Phish Threat runs phishing simulations and ties outcomes to training and policy-driven security awareness workflows. | enterprise phishing sims | 7.4/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 5 | Proofpoint Security Awareness Training Proofpoint security awareness training delivers simulated phishing and funnels user interactions into structured training and reporting paths. | enterprise phishing sims | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 6 | Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations Abnormal Security supports phishing simulations and breach-readiness workflows that evaluate user response to suspicious emails. | security automation | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 7 | Vade for Teams Vade for Teams combines email protection with phishing testing capabilities to assess user exposure and resilience. | email security + tests | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 8 | Mimecast Security Awareness Training Mimecast security awareness training runs phishing simulations and tracks reporting behavior to drive targeted training. | enterprise phishing sims | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 9 | Cofense (Phishing Testing and Awareness) Cofense supports phishing simulation and awareness programs linked to inbox protection and human-in-the-loop reporting. | phishing readiness | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 10 | IronScales IronScales performs phishing simulations and measures user reporting and remediation outcomes through its security awareness workflow. | breach readiness | 7.2/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.1/10 |
Egress phishing simulation sends test emails to measure susceptibility and improves reporting workflows with automated feedback loops.
KnowBe4 runs phishing email campaigns with templates, targeted simulations, and reporting and training integrations.
Microsoft Defender attack simulation training delivers phishing simulations inside Microsoft 365 and collects metrics on click and report rates.
Sophos Phish Threat runs phishing simulations and ties outcomes to training and policy-driven security awareness workflows.
Proofpoint security awareness training delivers simulated phishing and funnels user interactions into structured training and reporting paths.
Abnormal Security supports phishing simulations and breach-readiness workflows that evaluate user response to suspicious emails.
Vade for Teams combines email protection with phishing testing capabilities to assess user exposure and resilience.
Mimecast security awareness training runs phishing simulations and tracks reporting behavior to drive targeted training.
Cofense supports phishing simulation and awareness programs linked to inbox protection and human-in-the-loop reporting.
IronScales performs phishing simulations and measures user reporting and remediation outcomes through its security awareness workflow.
Egress Phishing
security awarenessEgress phishing simulation sends test emails to measure susceptibility and improves reporting workflows with automated feedback loops.
Phishing simulation reporting combined with user “report phishing” capture and analytics dashboards
Egress Phishing stands out with security controls built around phishing simulation and reporting workflows for Microsoft 365 environments. It supports email phishing campaigns that can measure user exposure, capture click and report behavior, and drive remediation through training content. Administrator dashboards consolidate campaign results and user-level trends for repeat testing and ongoing program management. Collaboration features also support reporting routes so organizations can operationalize “report phishing” behavior during simulations.
Pros
- Built-in reporting and remediation workflows for phishing simulation outcomes
- Strong coverage for Microsoft 365 targeting and test campaign management
- Actionable dashboards that track clicks, reports, and training completion
- User-friendly campaign creation that supports iterative testing
- Reporting routes help validate both click risk and user reporting behavior
Cons
- Advanced targeting and automation can require deeper admin configuration
- Simulation content customization can feel constrained versus full email template tools
- Data export and integration depth may not match specialized security orchestration suites
Best For
Organizations needing managed phishing simulations and user reporting behavior measurement
KnowBe4
security awarenessKnowBe4 runs phishing email campaigns with templates, targeted simulations, and reporting and training integrations.
Phish Alert Button integration that measures user reporting behavior during simulations
KnowBe4 stands out with a tight pairing of phishing simulations and an ongoing security awareness program. The platform delivers configurable phishing email templates, automated sending schedules, and reporting that tracks click and report rates. It also supports user reporting workflows to route simulated phishing messages into a measurable training loop. Administrative controls cover targeting by departments and managing remediation steps after results are collected.
Pros
- Strong phishing simulation reporting with click and report rate analytics
- Built-in remediation paths that trigger training after risky outcomes
- Flexible targeting by group and role for realistic testing
- User-friendly “report suspicious” workflow reduces dependence on manual reporting
Cons
- Advanced customization of simulations can be time-consuming for larger programs
- Reporting dashboards require setup discipline to stay consistently actionable
- Email template variations can feel repetitive without ongoing content management
Best For
Organizations running continuous phishing drills with structured remediation workflows
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
microsoft-integratedMicrosoft Defender attack simulation training delivers phishing simulations inside Microsoft 365 and collects metrics on click and report rates.
Attack Simulation Training campaigns with click-based training and automated remediation workflows
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training differentiates itself by integrating phishing simulations directly into the Microsoft 365 security stack used for Defender for Office 365 reporting and protection. The solution sends staged phishing emails, tracks user clicks and training progress, and supports automated enforcement paths that can include repeating training and escalating remediation. It also provides admin controls for user groups, simulation templates, and results reporting that align with common security awareness workflows.
Pros
- Integrated simulation and reporting inside Microsoft security workflows
- Tracks click behavior and training completion at user level
- Supports targeted campaigns with user group scoping controls
- Automates follow-up actions based on click outcomes
Cons
- Setup requires Microsoft 365 and Defender configuration familiarity
- Template flexibility can feel limited for highly custom scenarios
- Simulation reporting depends on correct licensing and role permissions
- Advanced scenario logic needs more operational process than custom tools
Best For
Teams using Microsoft 365 that need realistic phishing simulation and training measurement
Sophos Phish Threat
enterprise phishing simsSophos Phish Threat runs phishing simulations and ties outcomes to training and policy-driven security awareness workflows.
Sophos Phish Threat campaign reporting that tracks click and user reporting outcomes
Sophos Phish Threat focuses on hands-on phishing simulation and post-click protection to train users with measurable outcomes. It generates tailored phishing campaigns, tracks who clicks and reports, and uses reporting to guide follow-up education. Administration centers on creating templates, defining send conditions, and viewing reporting trends across campaigns. It also ties results into broader Sophos security controls for an integrated training and response workflow.
Pros
- Campaign reporting shows click and report rates for clear training metrics
- Integration with Sophos security products strengthens the testing-to-response loop
- Template-driven simulation reduces setup time for common phishing patterns
Cons
- Advanced targeting and workflow customization can feel limited versus top simulators
- Learning curve exists for tuning templates, conditions, and follow-up actions
- Less emphasis on granular user segmentation compared with specialist testing platforms
Best For
Organizations using Sophos security that need phishing simulations with measurable reporting
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
enterprise phishing simsProofpoint security awareness training delivers simulated phishing and funnels user interactions into structured training and reporting paths.
Click-and-report reporting analytics connected to required training completion
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training stands out with a tightly integrated approach to phishing simulation and security education under one administrative workflow. It supports scheduled phishing campaigns, template-based scenarios, and targeted rollout using group and user segmentation. Reporting links simulated click and report behavior to training outcomes, which helps show training effectiveness over time. The platform also includes message testing capabilities that fit organizational email delivery realities and learning loops.
Pros
- Phishing simulations tied directly to security awareness training outcomes
- Targeted campaigns using user and group segmentation improves relevance
- Detailed metrics track clicks, reports, and training completion trends
- Template-driven message creation speeds up repeated testing cycles
Cons
- Setup and customization require more administrator effort than lighter tools
- Report-driven workflows can feel complex for organizations with many groups
- Advanced scenarios depend on configuration across multiple training objects
Best For
Mid-market to enterprise teams standardizing phishing testing and training measurement
Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations
security automationAbnormal Security supports phishing simulations and breach-readiness workflows that evaluate user response to suspicious emails.
Phishing simulation tracking that reports clicks and credential submissions with cohort breakdowns
Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations stands out by tying phishing campaign simulation workflows to broader security visibility and reporting. It supports automated phishing outreach using templates, tracking for clicks and credential submission, and reporting by cohort and individual outcomes. The platform also emphasizes high-fidelity, permissioned execution with email-safe controls like domains, sending profiles, and message tracking. Simulation results feed security operations with context on which users fail which controls.
Pros
- Simulation analytics show click and submit outcomes by user and group
- Template-driven campaigns reduce setup time for repeated testing
- Works with security programs for coordinated reporting and remediation
Cons
- Campaign configuration can be complex for teams without security operations support
- Higher-fidelity testing depends on proper email and domain preparation
Best For
Security teams running recurring phishing tests with strong reporting and governance
Vade for Teams
email security + testsVade for Teams combines email protection with phishing testing capabilities to assess user exposure and resilience.
Vade phishing simulation campaigns that reuse detection-aligned templates and scoring signals
Vade for Teams emphasizes phishing simulation with real attacker-style delivery, using Vade’s anti-phishing engine to evaluate likely click and report behavior. Core capabilities include sending controlled phishing test emails, tracking outcomes per user, and guiding users toward safer reporting and handling. The workflow is built around measurable metrics that show which templates succeed and where awareness gaps remain. Admin views support iterative retesting across campaigns to reduce repeat failure patterns.
Pros
- Uses realistic phishing simulation aligned to the same detection logic used for protection
- Campaign reporting shows which users and templates drive clicks and approvals
- Repeat testing supports iterative improvement of email security training programs
- Built-in guidance reinforces safer user reporting behaviors after test exposure
Cons
- Simulation setup can feel constrained versus tools offering deeper custom template tooling
- Reporting focuses on outcomes more than granular behavioral breakdown across message components
- Less flexible campaign targeting compared with platforms offering advanced conditional logic
Best For
Security teams running iterative phishing simulations with measurable click and report outcomes
Mimecast Security Awareness Training
enterprise phishing simsMimecast security awareness training runs phishing simulations and tracks reporting behavior to drive targeted training.
Security awareness learning journeys that automatically route users after phishing test outcomes
Mimecast Security Awareness Training ties simulated phishing campaigns to learning journeys, reporting, and ongoing remediation workflows. It supports phishing email tests with templates, message customization, and scheduled waves to measure engagement and user click behavior. Administrators get dashboard reporting on who clicked, who completed training, and how results shift over repeated campaigns. It integrates with Mimecast’s broader email security and governance features to connect training outcomes with email risk management.
Pros
- Built around repeatable phishing simulations tied to training assignments and remediation
- Detailed reporting shows click behavior and training completion outcomes by user
- Integration with Mimecast email security strengthens closed-loop visibility
Cons
- Campaign setup can feel complex when tailoring content and schedules
- Training effectiveness analytics are stronger for phishing than for broader security topics
- Admin workflows rely on consistent user enrollment and assignment hygiene
Best For
Organizations standardizing phishing testing and remediation inside a Mimecast-focused stack
Cofense (Phishing Testing and Awareness)
phishing readinessCofense supports phishing simulation and awareness programs linked to inbox protection and human-in-the-loop reporting.
Cofense Reporter integration for tracking and responding to employee phishing reports
Cofense stands out with phishing simulation that tightly links email delivery, user reporting, and targeted remediation through Cofense Reporter and related workflows. The platform supports creating and launching phishing tests, tracking execution results, and measuring click, report, and engagement behavior over time. It also emphasizes employee reporting using integrated hooks in mail clients, which helps teams test both awareness and reporting processes rather than clicks alone.
Pros
- Integrates phishing simulation with user reporting to measure report rates, not only clicks
- Tracks campaign outcomes across recipients with repeatable testing cycles
- Provides structured guidance to improve reporting behavior after simulations
- Supports workflow-driven remediation through reporting and follow-up visibility
Cons
- Setup and ongoing campaign management can feel complex for small teams
- Advanced configuration requires careful planning to avoid inconsistent testing results
- Reporting and analysis depend on mailbox and agent integration coverage
- Less focused on lightweight, one-off testing needs compared with simpler simulators
Best For
Organizations that want measurable reporting behavior and structured follow-up workflows
IronScales
breach readinessIronScales performs phishing simulations and measures user reporting and remediation outcomes through its security awareness workflow.
Threat-aware phishing simulation tied to defense workflows and user remediation routing
IronScales stands out for pairing phishing simulations with defense workflows that can route incidents to individual users and teams. The platform focuses on testing and improving user response, with features such as threat-aware simulation and structured reporting for remediation. It also supports continuous phishing defense by tracking repeated engagement patterns and campaign outcomes across senders and templates.
Pros
- Blends phishing simulations with user response workflows for measurable improvement
- Campaign reporting ties testing outcomes to remediation actions
- Supports recurring defense programs that target repeatable risk patterns
- Offers flexible control over simulation targeting and messaging
Cons
- Setup complexity increases when coordinating training with incident response
- Reporting depth can feel heavy for teams wanting quick dashboards only
- Less direct fit for highly custom testing programs outside the provided workflow
Best For
Security teams running ongoing phishing defense and response training programs
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, Egress Phishing stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Phishing Email Testing Software
This buyer’s guide covers phishing email testing software built for measuring click risk, user reporting behavior, and training or remediation outcomes. It explains how Egress Phishing, KnowBe4, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations, and Cofense help teams run realistic test campaigns and act on results. The guide also compares how Sophos Phish Threat, Proofpoint Security Awareness Training, Vade for Teams, Mimecast Security Awareness Training, and IronScales structure reporting and follow-through workflows.
What Is Phishing Email Testing Software?
Phishing email testing software sends controlled phishing simulation messages to measure whether users click links, submit credentials, or use in-client reporting workflows. It solves the gap between security protection metrics and human behavior by tracking click and report rates and linking them to training or remediation. Typical users include security operations teams and security awareness program owners who need repeatable campaigns, dashboards, and follow-up actions. Tools like Egress Phishing and Cofense demonstrate this category by combining simulation delivery with measurable user reporting behavior and structured response paths.
Key Features to Look For
These features determine whether a phishing program produces actionable measurement and repeatable improvement instead of one-off tests.
Click and report rate analytics tied to user outcomes
Look for dashboards that track who clicked and who reported during campaigns. Egress Phishing pairs click and user report phishing capture in reporting workflows, and Cofense connects reporting and response through Cofense Reporter to measure report rates beyond clicks.
Integrated remediation and security awareness training workflows
Choose tools that automatically connect test outcomes to training completion so fixes happen after failures. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training drives click-based training and automated remediation paths inside Microsoft security workflows, and KnowBe4 triggers built-in remediation paths that route risky outcomes into training.
Report phishing workflow support that measures reporting behavior
The best phishing testing programs validate both whether users fall for simulations and whether they report them correctly. Egress Phishing includes reporting routes to operationalize report phishing behavior during simulations, and KnowBe4’s Phish Alert Button integration measures user reporting behavior during simulations.
Cohort and recipient-level breakdowns including credential submission
Advanced programs need visibility into which cohorts fail specific templates and which failures involve credential submission. Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations reports clicks and credential submissions by user and group with cohort breakdowns, and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training provides detailed metrics that connect simulated click and report behavior to training outcomes.
Template-driven campaign creation with repeatable testing cycles
Repeat testing succeeds when campaign setup is consistent across waves and templates. KnowBe4’s configurable phishing email templates and automated sending schedules support continuous drills, and Sophos Phish Threat uses template-driven simulation with defined send conditions for common phishing patterns.
Detection-aligned simulation logic tied to protection controls
For organizations that want high-fidelity testing, simulations that reuse protection logic create more believable outcomes. Vade for Teams emphasizes phishing simulation aligned to Vade’s anti-phishing engine scoring signals, and IronScales focuses on threat-aware simulation tied to defense workflows and user remediation routing.
How to Choose the Right Phishing Email Testing Software
Selecting the right tool depends on which behavior must be measured and how quickly outcomes must trigger training or operational remediation.
Define the behaviors that must be measured
If success means proving users report suspicious messages, prioritize tools with explicit reporting behavior capture. Egress Phishing tracks user report phishing capture alongside click analytics, and KnowBe4 uses Phish Alert Button integration to measure reporting during simulations. If credential theft behavior matters, Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations includes credential submission tracking with cohort-level reporting.
Match simulation and reporting to the email and security stack
Teams using Microsoft 365 should consider Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training because attack simulation is embedded into Microsoft security workflows and results align with Defender reporting and protection. Organizations focused on Mimecast governance and email security should evaluate Mimecast Security Awareness Training because it connects simulated phishing outcomes to learning journeys and remediation routing inside the Mimecast-focused workflow. For Sophos-heavy environments, Sophos Phish Threat integrates outcomes into broader Sophos security controls for an end-to-end awareness and response loop.
Select automation depth based on operational maturity
Organizations with mature security awareness operations can handle configuration that supports iterative testing and automated remediation. Egress Phishing can require deeper admin configuration for advanced targeting and automation workflows, and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training requires more administrator effort across multiple training objects for advanced scenarios. Security operations teams that want governance and permissioned execution can look at Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations even when campaign configuration takes more effort.
Evaluate template flexibility versus controlled realism
Tools vary in how constrained templates feel when programs need highly customized phishing content. Egress Phishing simulation content customization can feel constrained versus full template email toolsets, and Vade for Teams may feel constrained compared with platforms offering deeper custom template tooling. If the main need is repeated realism tied to detection logic, Vade for Teams and IronScales prioritize threat-aware workflows over free-form template freedom.
Confirm reporting actionability for repeat campaigns
The program must produce dashboards that stay consistently useful across waves instead of becoming a one-time report. KnowBe4’s reporting dashboards require setup discipline to remain consistently actionable, while Mimecast Security Awareness Training relies on consistent user enrollment and assignment hygiene for accurate learning journey routing. For teams that want rapid operational follow-through, Egress Phishing provides actionable dashboards and reporting routes, and Cofense Reporter supports structured guidance to improve reporting behavior after simulations.
Who Needs Phishing Email Testing Software?
Phishing email testing software fits teams that need measurable human outcomes like clicks and reports and want to drive training or remediation based on those outcomes.
Organizations that need managed simulations with explicit report phishing measurement
Egress Phishing is built around phishing simulation reporting plus user report phishing capture in analytics dashboards, making it a strong fit when reporting behavior matters as much as click behavior. Cofense also fits organizations that want measurable reporting behavior because Cofense Reporter supports employee phishing reporting tracking and structured follow-up workflows.
Microsoft 365 teams that need attack simulation and remediation embedded in Defender workflows
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training delivers phishing simulations inside the Microsoft 365 security stack and tracks click and training completion at user level. This design suits teams that want automated enforcement paths with repeating training and escalating remediation based on click outcomes.
Security awareness programs running continuous drills with structured remediation paths
KnowBe4 is tailored for continuous phishing drills through configurable phishing email templates, automated sending schedules, and remediation paths tied to risky outcomes. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training also supports scheduled phishing campaigns and connects click and report behavior directly to training completion trends.
Security operations teams that require cohort governance, credential submission visibility, and permissioned execution
Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations provides high-fidelity tracking that includes clicks and credential submissions with cohort breakdowns and security-ready controls like domains and sending profiles. IronScales fits teams that want threat-aware simulation tied to defense workflows and remediation routing for recurring defense programs.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The most frequent failures come from choosing tools that measure the wrong behaviors or from setting up campaigns in ways that make reporting unusable across time.
Measuring clicks only and ignoring user reporting behavior
Click-only measurement misses whether users do the correct next action after receiving a suspicious message. Egress Phishing and KnowBe4 explicitly measure user “report phishing” behavior through reporting routes and the Phish Alert Button integration, while Cofense Reporter focuses on employee phishing reporting tracking.
Choosing a tool without a direct training or remediation loop
Simulations that stop at a dashboard fail to drive consistent improvement when remediation is manual. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training and KnowBe4 both support automated follow-up actions that route risky outcomes into training, and Mimecast Security Awareness Training routes users through learning journeys after phishing test outcomes.
Running highly customized scenarios on a platform that feels constrained
Programs that require complex messaging variations can end up spending excessive time wrestling with template limitations. Egress Phishing may feel constrained for simulation content customization, and Vade for Teams can feel constrained compared with tools offering deeper custom template tooling, so template flexibility should be validated early.
Setting up segmentation and reporting in a way that breaks repeatability
Campaign targeting that is hard to configure or reporting that depends on clean enrollment can produce inconsistent metrics over time. Sophos Phish Threat and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training can require careful tuning of conditions and workflow setup, while Mimecast Security Awareness Training depends on consistent user enrollment and assignment hygiene.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every phishing email testing tool on three sub-dimensions. Features carry a weight of 0.4, ease of use carries a weight of 0.3, and value carries a weight of 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average of those three sub-dimensions using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Egress Phishing separated itself with features that combine phishing simulation reporting and user report phishing capture into actionable dashboards, which scored strongly on features and supported repeat testing workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About Phishing Email Testing Software
Which phishing email testing tool best fits organizations that run simulations inside Microsoft 365 and use Microsoft security reporting?
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training integrates phishing simulations into the Microsoft 365 security stack and aligns results with Defender for Office 365 reporting and protection workflows. Egress Phishing also targets Microsoft 365 with administrator dashboards and user-level reporting, but Defender for Office 365 is purpose-built for that Defender-centric environment.
What solution most directly measures both click behavior and the user action of reporting simulated phishing?
Egress Phishing captures click and report behavior in reporting workflows, so administrators can measure user exposure and reporting compliance from the same campaign. KnowBe4 pairs phishing simulations with ongoing security awareness and includes reporting behavior measurement through its Phish Alert Button workflow.
Which platform is best for teams that need iterative retesting with template performance scoring and repeat failure reduction?
Vade for Teams emphasizes repeated phishing simulations with measurable outcomes that highlight which templates drive likely click and report behavior. Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations also supports recurring tests, but it emphasizes governance and permissioned execution with cohort and individual outcome tracking.
Which phishing testing tool works well for organizations already standardizing around Sophos security controls?
Sophos Phish Threat focuses on hands-on phishing simulation and post-click protection, with campaign templates, send conditions, and reporting trends managed from Sophos administration centers. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training also supports scheduled phishing campaigns and measured training outcomes, but Sophos Phish Threat is the tighter fit when the wider stack is already Sophos.
Which option is strongest when security teams need simulation results that feed security operations with credential submission context?
Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations tracks clicks and credential submissions and reports by cohort and individual outcomes with permissioned execution controls. Cofense (Phishing Testing and Awareness) similarly links email delivery, employee reporting, and targeted remediation, but Abnormal is specifically designed to expose control failures tied to credential submission paths.
Which tool is best for standardizing a click-and-report training loop tied to required education completion?
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training connects simulated click and report behavior to required training completion and shows effectiveness over time through reporting tied to training outcomes. Mimecast Security Awareness Training also routes users after phishing test outcomes and tracks who clicked and who completed training, but Proofpoint centers the click-and-report analytics into the training requirement workflow.
What phishing simulation solution is designed for organizations that want reporting through mail-client or employee reporting hooks, not only clicks?
Cofense (Phishing Testing and Awareness) emphasizes employee reporting using integrated hooks in mail clients, which makes reporting behavior measurable alongside click and engagement signals. Egress Phishing also captures user “report phishing” actions during simulations, but Cofense is built around mail-client reporting integration through its reporter workflows.
Which tool supports message testing that fits real email delivery realities while connecting results to education?
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training includes message testing capabilities tied to organizational email delivery realities and then links simulated engagement to training outcomes. Mimecast Security Awareness Training integrates phishing testing with learning journeys and reporting dashboards, but Proofpoint explicitly focuses on message testing as part of the simulation-to-education measurement loop.
How do phishing testing tools handle governance and safe execution controls to reduce simulation risk?
Abnormal Security Phishing Simulations uses permissioned execution and email-safe controls such as domains, sending profiles, and message tracking to govern how simulations run. Egress Phishing and Mimecast Security Awareness Training also provide administrator dashboards and controlled workflows, but Abnormal is the most explicit about email-safe execution controls.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.