GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Email Testing Software of 2026
Ranking roundup of phishing email testing software with feature comparisons for teams using Cofense PhishMe, Mimecast, and Hoxhunt.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Cofense PhishMe is the strongest fit for security awareness teams that want repeatable phishing email campaigns with tight reporting analytics, whereas GoPhish works best when you need an API-first, self-managed way to control campaigns and measure user outcomes.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Cofense PhishMe
PhishMe couples phishing campaign reporting outcomes with operational campaign analytics to measure reporting behavior, not only clicks.
Built for fits when security awareness teams need repeatable phishing email campaigns with tight reporting analytics..
Mimecast Awareness Training
Editor pickRepeat offender tracking feeds follow-up campaigns based on prior user behavior across the awareness program.
Built for fits when security teams run recurring phishing simulations inside a Mimecast-centered mail program..
Hoxhunt
Editor pickGuided follow-up training tied to simulated message outcomes improves repeat-offender tracking decisions.
Built for fits when security teams need repeatable phishing simulations with behavioral follow-up..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Phishing email testing software simulates real delivery paths, captures user interactions, and produces reporting that maps to security risk and training completion. This ranked list targets security operators and technical evaluators who need integration and configuration depth, with ordering based on campaign automation, employee reporting workflows, and analytics coverage rather than marketing claims.
Cofense PhishMe
enterpriseCofense PhishMe runs phishing simulations and supports employee reporting of suspicious messages.
PhishMe couples phishing campaign reporting outcomes with operational campaign analytics to measure reporting behavior, not only clicks.
Cofense PhishMe is built around end-to-end phishing email campaign execution, starting from creating simulated phishing messages and ending with campaign analytics that separate report rate from susceptibility signals. It supports repeatable campaign operations through scheduling and target-group segmentation, and it tracks outcomes across users so repeat offender patterns can be reviewed. Directory synchronization and mail client integration reduce manual list management when user populations change frequently. Automation around enrollment and message delivery supports consistent throughput for multi-team environments.
A tradeoff is that the simulation workflow depends on correct mail delivery setup and user enrollment hygiene to avoid mis-targeting and skewed metrics. A common fit is an organization that already has standardized user groups and wants phishing resilience score style reporting outcomes tied to remediation actions. Another fit is a security awareness program that needs repeat campaigns to measure improvement using campaign analytics rather than one-off tests.
- +Strong simulation workflow with reporting outcomes tied to campaign analytics
- +Target segmentation and scheduling support repeatable measurement cycles
- +Directory synchronization and mailbox integration reduce list administration
- +Repeat campaign tracking supports identifying repeat offenders
- –Mail delivery and enrollment setup errors can distort susceptibility metrics
- –Template customization can be constrained versus fully custom phishing message builds
- –Larger organizations may need extra governance to manage many target groups
- –Attachment and landing page variations require deliberate authoring discipline
Security awareness managers
Measure report rate and resilience over time
Higher reporting participation visibility
SOC and security operations
Triage susceptibility trends by group
Faster targeted remediation
Show 2 more scenarios
IT administrators
Automate enrollment for changing directories
Reduced admin workload
Sync directory sources so user enrollment and targeting stay current without manual lists.
Compliance and governance teams
Maintain audit trail of phishing tests
Clear test accountability
Track campaign execution history so testing activities remain reviewable for governance reporting.
Best for: Fits when security awareness teams need repeatable phishing email campaigns with tight reporting analytics.
More related reading
Mimecast Awareness Training
enterpriseMimecast Awareness Training supports simulated phishing, online lessons, and user risk reporting.
Repeat offender tracking feeds follow-up campaigns based on prior user behavior across the awareness program.
Mimecast Awareness Training supports phishing email campaign execution with target-group segmentation and repeat offender tracking so that the same users can be re-engaged based on prior behavior. Campaign analytics provide susceptibility indicators tied to each simulated message, and the reporting output supports the training loop that follows user interaction. It also supports user enrollment so new cohorts can be included without manual per-user campaign setup each time.
A key tradeoff is that deeper automation and integration tend to align with Mimecast ecosystems rather than standalone, code-first simulation orchestration across arbitrary mail providers. It fits best when security teams want recurring, governance-friendly execution tied to mail and user administration rather than one-off external simulation batches.
- +Repeat offender tracking connects past behavior to follow-up campaigns
- +Campaign scheduling supports consistent phishing email campaign cadence
- +Campaign analytics connect user reporting actions to training outcomes
- +User enrollment reduces manual cohort management for ongoing programs
- –Automation depth is strongest when mail and user workflows use Mimecast
- –Advanced custom simulation workflows can be constrained by the built-in message builder
Security awareness managers
Run monthly phishing campaigns with re-targeting
Lower repeat susceptibility
IT security operations
Track report rate across departments
Faster remediation focus
Show 2 more scenarios
Compliance and audit stakeholders
Demonstrate consistent training coverage
Clear program accountability
Use enrollment and campaign execution history to maintain traceable awareness participation.
Helpdesk and training coordinators
Handle new hire phishing exposure
Faster onboarding readiness
Enroll new cohorts and apply scheduled simulations without per-user campaign setup.
Best for: Fits when security teams run recurring phishing simulations inside a Mimecast-centered mail program.
Hoxhunt
enterpriseHoxhunt delivers adaptive phishing simulations, employee reporting, and automated security training.
Guided follow-up training tied to simulated message outcomes improves repeat-offender tracking decisions.
Hoxhunt supports phishing email campaign execution with simulated phishing messages and scheduled delivery to segmented groups. Campaign reporting ties key engagement signals to training outcomes, which helps track susceptibility over repeated attempts. Admin workflows include template and campaign configuration that reduce the need for custom email building for common scenarios.
A tradeoff appears in environments that require deep custom automation for every step, since Hoxhunt’s differentiation centers on guided training and structured campaign workflows rather than fully custom orchestration. Hoxhunt fits best when security teams want consistent simulated attack patterns and a closed loop between message exposure, reporting behavior, and training assignments.
- +Structured campaign workflow links simulation exposure to targeted follow-up actions
- +Reporting connects engagement results to user behavior patterns for repeated campaigns
- +Template-driven setup reduces effort for common phishing email campaign variations
- +Group targeting supports different risk assumptions across departments
- –Deep automation and custom orchestration need extra integration work
- –Landing page behavior requires additional configuration for advanced realism
- –Multi-channel extensions can lag behind email-only scenarios in coverage depth
Security awareness teams
Run quarterly phishing drills with feedback
Higher report rate over cycles
IT security administrators
Segment users by risk for targeting
Lower noise in metrics
Show 2 more scenarios
Compliance and audit stakeholders
Track user response trends
Clearer audit narrative
Campaign analytics summarize engagement outcomes so security leaders can evidence program results.
Managers of remote workforces
Standardize phishing testing across locations
Uniform training coverage
Scheduled campaigns and template reuse help keep simulated messages consistent for distributed users.
Best for: Fits when security teams need repeatable phishing simulations with behavioral follow-up.
GoPhish
API-firstGoPhish is an open-source phishing framework for creating campaigns, landing pages, and email templates.
Built-in phishing campaign state and tracking, including credential submission measurement when using its capture flow.
GoPhish is an open source phishing email testing solution focused on launching simulated phishing email campaigns with tracking for user interactions. It supports campaign scheduling, target-group segmentation through importable contacts, and result reporting with metrics like report rate, click-through rate, and credential submission rate when applicable.
GoPhish’s core data flow is driven by message templates and landing page or credential-harvesting components you host or configure alongside it. Campaign iteration uses user enrollment state so repeated exposure and outcomes can be reviewed across runs.
- +Straightforward campaign workflow with message templates and result tracking
- +Actionable metrics for report rate and click-through rate per simulation
- +Credential-harvesting simulation option for credential submission rate
- +Open source deployment enables custom modifications to templates and workflows
- –Less built-in enterprise governance for RBAC and audit log needs
- –Directory synchronization and SSO integration typically require extra engineering
- –Landing page and credential flows require careful self-hosting and hardening
- –Higher operational overhead for upgrades, patching, and environment parity
Best for: Fits when teams need controllable phishing email campaigns with measurable user outcomes and can run self-managed infrastructure.
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training
enterpriseMicrosoft Attack Simulation Training tests phishing resilience within Microsoft Defender for Office 365.
Linking simulated phishing outcomes to built-in security awareness training journeys and user reporting actions inside Microsoft 365.
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training runs phishing email campaigns by pairing simulated phishing message delivery with user reporting and security awareness content. It supports scenario templates for credential-harvesting simulation and other social engineering themes, with campaign scheduling, target group scoping, and repeat offender tracking.
Results land in reporting that ties clicks, report actions, and completion metrics to each campaign instance. Governance is handled through Microsoft 365 security controls and role permissions, with audit-friendly activity visibility for administrators.
- +Direct Microsoft 365 integration for sending simulated messages and capturing events
- +Campaign analytics connect click behavior with user report actions
- +Scenario-based templates speed up credential-focused phishing simulations
- +Role-based admin controls support delegated campaign management
- –Setup depends on Microsoft 365 configuration and tenant permissions
- –Advanced landing page and message customization can require workflow knowledge
- –Email template customization is less flexible than raw mail-merge approaches
- –Reporting and learning flows can be harder to standardize across many campaigns
Best for: Fits when Microsoft 365 administrators need centrally governed phishing simulations with user reporting and training metrics.
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
enterpriseProofpoint provides phishing simulations, targeted training, and risk reporting for enterprise security teams.
Repeat offender tracking ties user behavior across phishing email campaign cycles to targeted remediation actions.
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training combines phishing simulation, security awareness training content, and reporting into one workflow for reducing phishing risk. Its phishing email campaign capability supports message targeting and measurable outcomes like click behavior and report button usage.
Proofpoint pairs simulated phishing with just-in-time training to route recipients into remediation based on how they respond. Reporting emphasizes operator visibility into susceptibility trends and repeat behavior across campaigns.
- +Strong report button integration for separating alerting from mere clicks
- +Repeat offender tracking improves focus on users who repeatedly engage
- +Just-in-time training paths connect outcomes to remediation actions
- +Built-in campaign analytics support operator decisions across multiple simulations
- –Advanced targeting rules require deliberate campaign and user-group setup
- –Mail client integration coverage can limit results in edge-case client environments
- –Landing page realism depends on chosen template and cloning approach
- –Cross-system onboarding can require coordination with directory sync
Best for: Fits when security teams need measurable phishing resilience trends with outcome-driven training and repeat-user focus.
Sophos Phish Threat
SMBSophos Phish Threat provides simulated phishing campaigns, templates, training, and campaign analytics.
Repeat offender tracking in campaign analytics ties individual engagement history to follow-up actions.
Sophos Phish Threat targets phishing email testing with campaign workflow and reporting built for security teams that already use Sophos security controls. It generates simulated phishing email campaigns from configurable templates, sends them to selected user groups, and captures engagement metrics like report and click outcomes.
Reporting is designed for repeat tracking and ongoing resilience measurement across multiple campaigns. Automation focuses on operational control of enrollment, scheduling, and campaign execution rather than custom content authoring tools alone.
- +Campaign execution and reporting are built around simulated phishing message outcomes
- +Group-based targeting supports practical enrollment and repeat offender tracking
- +Template-driven content reduces variance across phishing email campaign variants
- +Integrated analytics emphasize report rate alongside click-through rate
- –Advanced scenarios require more operational setup than simple template reuse
- –Custom landing page cloning depth is limited compared with clone-focused tools
- –Complex targeting logic can be harder to manage at large scale
- –Attachment and QR based simulations are less flexible than specialized simulators
Best for: Fits when security teams want controlled phishing simulations with repeatable reporting workflows.
Barracuda PhishLine
enterpriseBarracuda PhishLine provides simulated phishing campaigns, training, and employee risk reporting.
Repeat offender tracking that ties repeated susceptibility behavior to ongoing campaign outcomes and remediation.
Barracuda PhishLine is a phishing email testing and security awareness workflow centered on creating realistic simulated phishing message campaigns. Barracuda PhishLine focuses on credential-harvesting style scenarios, including templates that route users through message and landing page stages.
The product supports campaign scheduling, user targeting, and ongoing reporting for susceptibility and engagement outcomes. Administration centers on organizing phishing simulation campaigns for managed user groups and tracking repeat offender patterns.
- +Good scenario coverage for credential and landing-page phishing
- +Campaign scheduling and user targeting work without custom code
- +Reporting tracks outcomes that correlate with click and report behavior
- +Administration supports grouping users for repeatable enrollment flows
- –Limited visibility into deliverability plumbing compared with mail-focused tools
- –Less automation depth for advanced risk-based targeting compared with specialists
- –Template customization is constrained versus fully template-engine products
- –Integration depth depends on how user directories and auth are connected
Best for: Fits when security teams need credential-style simulations, scheduled campaigns, and clear outcome reporting for user groups.
Phished
SMBPhished automates phishing simulations, security training, and user risk scoring.
Campaign configuration ties template choices to tracked outcomes so each simulated phishing message maps cleanly to reporting, clicks, and credential submissions.
Phished runs phishing email simulations by generating and sending simulated phishing messages with scenario-specific templates and delivery controls. Campaign management includes target-group segmentation, user enrollment workflows, and per-message tracking to measure report rate, click-through rate, and credential submission rate.
The tool supports scenario variety such as credential-harvesting and attachment or link based threat tests, then summarizes results for remediation and follow-up training. Admin features focus on campaign configuration governance and auditability of what was sent to which targets and when.
- +Scenario templates support realistic phishing email variations and credential-harvesting flows
- +Target-group segmentation and user enrollment support controlled rollout across departments
- +Campaign analytics track report rate, click-through rate, and credential submission outcomes
- +Audit-style campaign records show what was sent and which targets received it
- –Mail client rendering QA depends on careful template configuration and pre-send checks
- –Complex scenario logic requires more manual setup than rules-first schedulers
- –Integration depth with external systems is limited compared with enterprises that need deep automation
- –Governance controls for multi-admin workflows require disciplined permission management
Best for: Fits when security teams need measurable phishing campaign outcomes with controlled target enrollment and repeatable templates.
usecure
SMBusecure provides phishing simulations, security awareness training, and compliance reporting.
usecure ties credential-submission tracking directly to each simulated phishing email campaign run.
usecure focuses on phishing email testing with scenario-driven campaigns and message delivery aimed at measurable user outcomes. The product supports templated simulated phishing emails and credentials-harvesting style scenarios that can be evaluated by click and submission behavior.
It also provides reporting that connects campaign activity to exposure signals for follow-up security awareness actions. Governance controls center on managing who can create and run campaigns and what results are visible to different admin roles.
- +Scenario-based campaign creation with reusable email templates
- +Credential-harvesting simulations tied to submission outcomes
- +Role-based access for campaign creation and results visibility
- +Campaign reporting links message engagement to security outcomes
- –Limited coverage for complex multi-step landing page flows
- –Automation and API surface lag behind higher-ranked tooling
- –Template customization is constrained compared to code-driven options
- –Some governance controls require careful user and campaign mapping
Best for: Fits when teams need standard phishing simulation campaigns with clear click and submission reporting.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, Cofense PhishMe stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right phishing email testing software
This buyer’s guide covers phishing email testing software workflows that generate simulated phishing email campaigns, measure user outcomes, and drive remediation actions with tools like Cofense PhishMe, Mimecast Awareness Training, Hoxhunt, GoPhish, Microsoft Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint Security Awareness Training, Sophos Phish Threat, Barracuda PhishLine, Phished, and usecure.
The guide maps tool capabilities to concrete evaluation criteria such as reporting tied to reporting button outcomes, repeat offender tracking across campaign cycles, and integration depth for enrollment and message delivery.
Use this guide to compare how each tool handles campaign execution, target-group scoping, and results collection, then pick the tool that matches the operational model required by the email and identity environment.
Phishing simulation and reporting platforms for measurable phishing email campaign outcomes
Phishing email testing software runs simulated phishing message deliveries, tracks what users do after exposure, and records outcomes such as report rate, click-through rate, and credential submission rate when credential-harvesting flows are used. These platforms also coordinate follow-up actions such as security awareness training or remediation triggers so measured behavior leads to repeatable training loops.
Cofense PhishMe and Mimecast Awareness Training show how this category turns simulation results into operational reporting and follow-up campaign logic using message workflows, campaign analytics, and repeat offender tracking. Teams typically use these tools for ongoing phishing resilience measurement, susceptibility trend tracking, and just-in-time user actions tied to campaign outcomes.
Evaluation criteria that map to real phishing campaign operations
Phishing email testing has failure modes that show up in metrics, so evaluation should focus on how outcomes are measured and how campaigns map to the actual user population. Cofense PhishMe and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training illustrate how report behavior and remediation routing drive decisions beyond click rates.
Campaign governance also matters because many teams run recurring phishing email campaign programs with multiple target groups and repeated measurement cycles. Tools like Microsoft Attack Simulation Training and GoPhish differ sharply in how much governance comes from the surrounding mail and identity ecosystem versus self-hosted control.
Outcome-linked reporting that separates clicks from user reporting
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training emphasizes report button integration to separate user reporting from mere clicks and to support operator visibility into susceptibility trends. Cofense PhishMe also ties simulation reporting outcomes to operational campaign analytics so the measurement focuses on reporting behavior, not only clicks.
Repeat offender tracking that feeds follow-up campaigns
Mimecast Awareness Training uses repeat offender tracking to drive follow-up campaigns based on prior user behavior across the awareness program. Hoxhunt also routes guided follow-up training tied to simulated message outcomes to improve repeat-offender decisions.
Enrollment and real-user targeting via mailbox and directory connectivity
Cofense PhishMe integrates with mailbox and user directory sources so enrollment and message delivery map to real user populations. GoPhish supports target-group segmentation via importable contacts, which can work for self-managed enrollment but typically shifts directory accuracy effort onto the operator.
Scenario templates for credential-harvesting and social engineering phases
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training uses scenario templates designed for credential-focused simulations and social engineering themes inside Microsoft 365 workflows. Barracuda PhishLine focuses on credential-harvesting style scenarios that route users through message and landing page stages so credential submission outcomes remain measurable.
Built-in campaign state and tracking for each simulation run
GoPhish includes built-in phishing campaign state and tracking so repeated exposure and outcomes are reviewed across runs, including credential submission measurement when using its capture flow. Phished links campaign configuration to tracked outcomes so each simulated phishing message maps cleanly to reporting, clicks, and credential submissions.
Governance controls aligned to the mail and security ecosystem
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training uses Microsoft 365 security controls and role permissions to support delegated campaign management with audit-friendly activity visibility. GoPhish is open source and typically lacks built-in enterprise governance for RBAC and audit log needs, which increases the operator burden for multi-admin environments.
Pick a phishing email testing workflow that matches operational control and reporting needs
Choosing the right phishing email testing software depends on where campaign execution should live and how tightly reporting should tie to user actions. Cofense PhishMe and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training focus on tying operational analytics to reporting behavior, while GoPhish emphasizes self-managed infrastructure and campaign templates.
The decision process below starts with the environment where simulations must run, then checks how follow-up and measurement cycles work across repeated campaign runs.
Choose the execution model based on the email and identity ecosystem
If Microsoft 365 is the execution anchor, Microsoft Attack Simulation Training fits because it runs phishing email campaigns by pairing simulated delivery with user reporting and built-in security awareness content inside Microsoft Defender for Office 365. If Mimecast is already central for mail controls, Mimecast Awareness Training fits because it is built for recurring simulations inside a Mimecast-centered workflow.
Confirm whether reporting must include report button outcomes, not just clicks
For teams that want operator-grade visibility into who reported instead of who clicked, Proofpoint Security Awareness Training is built around report button integration as part of the outcome measurement. For teams that want reporting behavior measured as a campaign analytics signal, Cofense PhishMe couples phishing campaign outcomes with operational campaign analytics.
Decide how follow-up should use repeat-offender behavior across campaigns
If follow-up campaigns must use repeat offender behavior to decide who gets additional exposure, Mimecast Awareness Training feeds repeat offenders into follow-up campaign logic. If follow-up should become guided training routed to outcomes like reporting and clicking, Hoxhunt provides guided follow-up training tied to simulated message outcomes.
Select the level of self-hosting control versus built-in governance
If the organization can operate infrastructure for landing pages and optional credential capture flows, GoPhish supports self-managed deployment with built-in campaign state and tracking. If the organization needs delegated admin controls and audit-friendly visibility tied to an existing security platform, Microsoft Attack Simulation Training provides role-based admin controls through Microsoft 365 security controls.
Match the realism and complexity of landing page and scenario workflows to available authoring effort
If landing page realism requires careful configuration and the workflow will be operated by engineers, GoPhish’s landing page and credential flows require careful self-hosting and hardening. If scenario workflows focus on credential-harvesting style stages and measured outcomes, Barracuda PhishLine provides a credential and landing page staged approach designed for scheduled campaigns.
Phishing email testing teams by operational priorities
Different phishing email testing software tools emphasize different parts of the operational chain, such as measurement depth, follow-up behavior, and how enrollment maps to real users. The segments below are derived from what each tool is best suited to support with its core workflow and tradeoffs.
The goal is to align the tool’s measurement model with the campaign cadence and the remediation actions the security awareness program actually runs.
Security awareness teams running repeatable measurement cycles with tight reporting analytics
Cofense PhishMe fits because it couples phishing campaign reporting outcomes with operational campaign analytics and supports repeat campaign tracking for identifying repeat offenders. It also integrates with mailbox and user directory sources so enrollment and message delivery map to real user populations.
Organizations running recurring simulations inside a Mimecast-centered mail program
Mimecast Awareness Training fits because it supports campaign scheduling, message creation for multiple threat scenarios, and reporting that ties user actions to outcomes within the Mimecast mail workflow. Its repeat offender tracking connects past behavior to follow-up campaigns inside the awareness program.
Teams that need adaptive follow-up training routed by simulated message outcomes
Hoxhunt fits because it centers on sending controlled campaigns, tracking engagement, and routing people into targeted security awareness actions after reporting or clicking. It also improves repeat-offender tracking decisions with guided follow-up training tied to simulated message outcomes.
Microsoft 365 administrators who want centrally governed simulation execution and training journeys
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training fits because it tests phishing resilience within Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and links simulated phishing outcomes to built-in security awareness training journeys and user reporting actions. Role-based admin controls support delegated campaign management inside Microsoft 365.
Where phishing email testing programs break in practice
Phishing email testing failures show up as distorted metrics, missing governance, or landing page behavior that does not match the intended scenario. The pitfalls below reflect concrete constraints and setup dependencies found across the reviewed tools.
Avoiding these mistakes requires aligning campaign design effort with the tool’s authoring flexibility and aligning enrollment accuracy with how susceptibility metrics are computed.
Accepting susceptibility metrics without validating enrollment and delivery mapping
Cofense PhishMe can produce distorted susceptibility metrics if mail delivery and enrollment setup errors occur, so list accuracy and enrollment mapping must be validated before running measurement cycles. GoPhish can also require careful self-managed contact imports because directory synchronization and SSO typically require extra engineering.
Measuring only click-through rate and treating it as a proxy for reporting
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training separates alerting from clicks using report button integration, so ignoring report outcomes makes the operator view incomplete. Cofense PhishMe also focuses on reporting behavior through coupled campaign analytics, so click-only measurement will miss the signal that drives follow-up decisions.
Underestimating authoring constraints for templates, landing pages, and advanced scenario realism
Barracuda PhishLine has limited template customization versus products built around deeper template-engine workflows, so landing page variations need deliberate authoring discipline. Sophos Phish Threat limits landing page cloning depth compared with clone-focused tools, so advanced landing page realism requires extra operational setup.
Assuming built-in governance exists for multi-admin environments in self-managed deployments
GoPhish lacks built-in enterprise governance for RBAC and audit log needs, so multi-admin governance requires additional engineering and operational discipline. usecure provides role-based access for campaign creation and results visibility, so it better matches teams that need structured permissioning without custom governance work.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Cofense PhishMe, Mimecast Awareness Training, Hoxhunt, GoPhish, Microsoft Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint Security Awareness Training, Sophos Phish Threat, Barracuda PhishLine, Phished, and usecure using a criteria-based scoring approach that compares features, ease of use, and value. Features carried the most weight at forty percent, while ease of use and value each accounted for thirty percent based on the practical operational impact described in the tool capabilities and constraints. This editorial research focused on what each product actually supports in phishing email campaign workflows, including reporting outputs, repeat offender behavior, and how enrollment or governance ties into the surrounding mail and identity environment.
Cofense PhishMe set itself apart by coupling phishing campaign reporting outcomes with operational campaign analytics to measure reporting behavior, not only clicks. That reporting-measurement emphasis lifted its features score and supported a high ease-of-use score by keeping measurement and campaign analytics in a single console workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions About phishing email testing software
How do Cofense PhishMe and GoPhish differ in campaign measurement and reporting outcomes?
Which tools provide repeat offender tracking for follow-up campaigns based on prior user behavior?
How does Microsoft Attack Simulation Training handle governance and audit visibility for phishing simulations inside Microsoft 365?
When do Hoxhunt and Barracuda PhishLine route users into follow-on security actions after a simulated message?
What breaks if a team needs code-driven simulation logic that must run outside a vendor-managed mail or identity flow?
Which products integrate directly with existing mail controls and user directory sources for enrollment mapping?
How does Phished structure campaign configuration so each template choice maps to tracked outcomes?
How do Sophos Phish Threat and usecure differ in how they manage configuration and execution for phishing email campaigns?
When should teams choose Hoxhunt over Proofpoint Security Awareness Training for behavioral follow-up after simulated phishing?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.