Top 10 Best Email Phishing Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Cybersecurity Information Security

Top 10 Best Email Phishing Software of 2026

Top 10 email phishing software ranked by features, pricing, and ratings for security teams, featuring Cofense PhishMe, KnowBe4, and Hoxhunt.

29 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Email phishing software matters because it converts training and detection into measurable workflows that security teams can audit, automate, and integrate with existing mail controls. This ranked list is built for evaluators comparing simulation coverage, reporting data models, and admin-grade configuration so buyers can narrow choices without relying on marketing claims.

Cofense PhishMe is the right pick if your security team needs measurable phishing simulation tied to a report-to-triage workflow, whereas Hornetsecurity fits teams that want mailbox policy governance with simulations rolled out for specific groups.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Cofense PhishMe

PhishMe phishing report button workflow turns user reports into actionable signals tied to campaign outcomes.

Built for fits when security teams need measurable simulation plus a report-to-triage workflow..

2

KnowBe4

Editor pick

Repeat-offender tracking connects future risk decisions to prior user report and click behavior across campaigns.

Built for fits when security teams run repeated phishing simulations and want consistent remedial training paths..

3

Hoxhunt

Editor pick

Outcome-driven remediation that changes the user learning path based on report and click behavior.

Built for fits when security teams want outcome-driven follow-up training with governed admin access..

Comparison Table

1
Cofense PhishMeBest overall
enterprise
9.0/10
Overall
2
enterprise
8.7/10
Overall
3
enterprise
8.4/10
Overall
4
8.1/10
Overall
5
7.8/10
Overall
6
7.5/10
Overall
7
7.2/10
Overall
8
6.8/10
Overall
9
6.6/10
Overall
10
6.3/10
Overall
#1

Cofense PhishMe

enterprise

Phishing detection, simulation, reporting, and response software.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.3/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

PhishMe phishing report button workflow turns user reports into actionable signals tied to campaign outcomes.

Cofense PhishMe runs credential-harvesting and link-based phishing simulations with campaign scheduling and per-user targeting. It couples simulations with an end-user phishing report button workflow so reported messages can be triaged without relying only on mailbox rules. Campaign analytics track report rates and click behavior by group and campaign, which supports follow-up training assignments and operational review cycles. It also provides guidance for handling simulated messages so they do not disrupt incident response workflows.

A tradeoff appears in the reporting-to-action path, because remediation outcomes depend on how training materials and assignments are integrated into the broader security awareness process. Teams with a mature internal process for message handling and follow-up benefit most when they use PhishMe for consistent campaign cadence and fast triage of user reports. Usage works best when admins standardize templates and targeting logic so that measurement stays comparable across quarters.

Pros
  • +Phishing report button workflow connects user behavior to triage signals
  • +Credential-harvesting simulation supports controlled end-to-end assessment
  • +Campaign analytics track report rate and click behavior by group
  • +Configuration supports repeatable scheduling for consistent measurement
Cons
  • –Remedial impact depends on how training assignments connect internally
  • –Advanced targeting setup needs governance and steady admin ownership
  • –Template customization can be constrained versus fully custom simulation flows
  • –User reporting outcomes vary if end-user training reduces report friction
Use scenarios
  • Security operations teams

    Triage user-reported suspicious emails

    Faster investigation routing

  • Security awareness program owners

    Run scheduled simulations by cohort

    Measurable program trends

Show 2 more scenarios
  • IT governance teams

    Standardize templates and approvals

    Consistent measurement

    Controlled campaign configuration limits template sprawl across departments and business units.

  • Regional security leaders

    Address repeat-offender behaviors

    Targeted remediation focus

    Analytics support follow-up on users who repeatedly click or fail to report simulated messages.

Best for: Fits when security teams need measurable simulation plus a report-to-triage workflow.

#2

KnowBe4

enterprise

Phishing simulation and security awareness training platform.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Repeat-offender tracking connects future risk decisions to prior user report and click behavior across campaigns.

KnowBe4 is built around scheduled simulated phishing campaigns and follow-on remedial training, which supports repeat learning loops instead of one-time testing. The system can target users from directory synchronization, and it can run both link-based and attachment-based phishing templates without changing separate tools. Campaign analytics track susceptibility and engagement signals over time, which supports governance review for security and HR alignment.

A tradeoff is that deeper customization of templates and training paths increases admin overhead and makes changes harder to version across multiple locations. KnowBe4 works well when security teams need a predictable monthly cadence with consistent templates, plus remediation assignment when users click or fail to report.

Pros
  • +Campaign scheduling supports recurring simulation cycles without manual re-launches
  • +Template library covers multiple phishing formats for varied training objectives
  • +Remedial training can be tied to user outcomes for faster behavior correction
  • +User-level reporting supports tracking repeat offenders across campaigns
Cons
  • –Multi-team setup needs careful RBAC planning to avoid broad access
  • –Template customization depth increases maintenance work for administrators
  • –Advanced targeting relies on directory sync quality and ongoing data hygiene
  • –Link and attachment simulation tuning can require iterative configuration
Use scenarios
  • Security awareness leaders

    Monthly simulations with automated remediation

    Higher report and compliance rates

  • IT directory admins

    Directory-synced targeting for campaigns

    Reduced manual user management

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Security governance teams

    RBAC and audit-friendly admin control

    Stronger review and accountability

    Role-based access limits who can configure campaigns and training while retaining change history.

  • HR training coordinators

    Consistent awareness learning paths

    Repeatable training processes

    Remedial training assignments standardize responses to risky outcomes across departments.

Best for: Fits when security teams run repeated phishing simulations and want consistent remedial training paths.

#3

Hoxhunt

enterprise

Adaptive phishing training and employee threat reporting platform.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Outcome-driven remediation that changes the user learning path based on report and click behavior.

Hoxhunt is built for teams that want automation around susceptibility and follow-up learning rather than one-off simulations. Campaigns can be scheduled repeatedly, and results can drive remedial training paths for users who click or fail to report. The reporting view connects campaign outcomes back to individual behavior so repeat offenders can be identified.

A key tradeoff is that deep workflow customization depends on how integrations and automation are configured at setup time. Hoxhunt fits well when security awareness programs need consistent campaign cadence across departments and want governance controls for who can launch and view results.

Pros
  • +Interactive learning flows tied to campaign outcomes
  • +Repeat-offender tracking across scheduled simulations
  • +Role-based access controls with auditable admin actions
  • +Clear report and click analytics per campaign and user
Cons
  • –Workflow customization requires up-front setup decisions
  • –Some advanced template customization is limited to configuration
  • –Deep identity mapping depends on integration quality
  • –Large-scale rollout can require careful group targeting
Use scenarios
  • Security awareness managers

    Run recurring phishing simulations by department

    Lower repeat offender rate

  • Security operations teams

    Investigate susceptibility trends across users

    Faster targeting of training

Show 2 more scenarios
  • IT and IAM administrators

    Sync groups for campaign eligibility

    Less manual user management

    Identity and group integration keeps who receives simulations aligned to access needs.

  • GRC and compliance teams

    Govern who can launch campaigns

    Stronger operational accountability

    Admin roles and audit logs support controlled operations for phishing simulation management.

Best for: Fits when security teams want outcome-driven follow-up training with governed admin access.

#4

Barracuda Email Protection

enterprise

Email security suite with phishing defense, awareness training, and incident response.

8.1/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Policy-driven message handling at the gateway, including attachment and URL inspection with quarantine and enforcement modes tied to delivery flow.

Barracuda Email Protection focuses on stopping phishing at the mail gateway with policy-based scanning, message quarantine, and user notifications tied to delivery outcomes. The product emphasizes URL and attachment inspection and integrates with directory sources so policy can follow group membership.

It also supports operational controls such as audit-style reporting, configurable enforcement modes, and workflow alignment with inbound and outbound mail paths. Administrators get a governance-first approach rather than a training-only phishing simulation workflow.

Pros
  • +Gateway enforcement combines attachment and URL inspection with quarantine decisions
  • +Directory-backed policy targeting reduces per-user exceptions and tuning drift
  • +Delivery-focused reporting links actions to specific message handling outcomes
  • +Configurable enforcement modes support staged rollout without removing protection
Cons
  • –Phishing simulation and awareness workflows are not the primary focus
  • –Admin tuning can require ongoing governance to avoid false positive pressure
  • –Automation and API-based campaign injection options are limited versus simulation specialists
  • –Granular user-risk scoring for training is not available as a core workflow

Best for: Fits when security teams need inbound phishing suppression at the gateway and rely on separate tooling for training simulations.

#5

Hornetsecurity

SMB

Email security and awareness platform with phishing simulation capabilities.

7.8/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.6/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Tight operational alignment between phishing simulations and Hornetsecurity email security administration workflows.

Hornetsecurity runs email phishing simulation campaigns and supporting awareness workflows from its security awareness tooling. Campaign creation supports both link-based and attachment-based scenarios, with templates and guided configuration for recurring runs.

Administration centers on controlled rollout to groups, tracking of report behavior, and campaign analytics tied to outcomes like click and submit activity. The strongest differentiator is how the service fits into Hornetsecurity email security operations, pairing simulation visibility with mailbox protection and policy governance context.

Pros
  • +Campaign analytics include report button and recipient outcome tracking
  • +Supports both link-based and attachment-based phishing simulation scenarios
  • +Group-based targeting supports staged rollout across departments
  • +Fits into Hornetsecurity email security governance workflows
Cons
  • –Advanced scenario customization depth is narrower than some simulation-first vendors
  • –Integrations beyond directory sync and common identity patterns can be limited
  • –Reporting and remedial training tuning takes more admin effort than expected
  • –APIs for deep external campaign automation are not as broadly exposed

Best for: Fits when email security teams want phishing simulation linked to mailbox policy governance and group rollout.

#6

Proofpoint Security Awareness Training

enterprise

Phishing simulation, security education, and risk-based awareness software.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Phishing report button handling connects user reports to campaign outcomes and drives follow-on learning assignments.

Proofpoint Security Awareness Training targets security teams that need phishing simulation with reporting and follow-up learning in one workflow.

It uses configurable simulated campaigns, phishing report button handling, and campaign analytics tied to user behavior.

The training layer supports remedial education and content assignment driven by repeat clicking or reporting patterns.

It also integrates into enterprise identity and email environments to reduce manual effort for scheduling and distribution.

Pros
  • +Integrated phishing report workflows feed measurable outcomes into remediation
  • +Remedial training can be triggered from simulated campaign results
  • +Identity and directory synchronization reduce repeated onboarding work
  • +Campaign analytics support decision-making on click and repeat risk
Cons
  • –Admin setup requires careful governance to keep templates aligned with policy
  • –Automation depth depends on integration choices for email delivery and identity
  • –Template customization can be time-intensive for nonstandard creative needs
  • –Scoring behaviors can be granular, which increases tuning overhead for new admins

Best for: Fits when enterprises need end-to-end phishing simulation plus remedial training with identity-driven administration.

#7

Microsoft Attack Simulation Training

enterprise

Phishing simulation and user training within Microsoft Defender for Office 365.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Tenant-integrated campaign governance with Entra ID permissions and Microsoft 365-aligned reporting views.

Microsoft Attack Simulation Training pairs Microsoft 365-based delivery with role-based workflows for building simulated phishing campaigns and tracking outcomes. The product lets security teams create link, attachment, and credential-harvesting style simulations using templates and custom content, then route results into user reporting and follow-up training tasks.

Governance is handled through Entra ID permissions, audit-friendly admin controls, and reporting views that separate simulation performance from training completion. Microsoft-focused organizations get the tightest fit when phishing simulations must align with existing identity and tenant administration.

Pros
  • +Role-based admin controls integrate with Microsoft Entra ID tenancy
  • +Campaign reports track simulation outcomes and remediation training signals
  • +Template-driven creation supports link and attachment simulation variants
  • +Centralized governance views reduce operational drift across teams
Cons
  • –Customization depth for advanced phishing formats is less flexible than specialist tools
  • –Operational setup across mail delivery and tenant permissions adds initial effort
  • –Automation options can require more manual sequencing than API-first platforms
  • –Granular per-user remediation workflows may feel constrained for edge cases

Best for: Fits when Microsoft 365 tenants need governed phishing simulations tied to identity and centralized reporting.

#8

PhishingBox

SMB

Phishing simulation, awareness training, and campaign management software.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Repeat-offender tracking ties ongoing susceptibility patterns to campaign reporting for targeted remediation.

PhishingBox is an email phishing simulation and phishing awareness training solution with templates, scheduling, and measurable campaign outcomes. Its core workflow centers on creating simulated phishing emails, sending them to targeted groups, and collecting user actions like clicks and report button usage.

Admin visibility focuses on campaign analytics and repeat behavior tracking to support remedial training decisions. The strongest day-to-day value comes from how configuration and reporting map to iterative awareness programs rather than one-off tests.

Pros
  • +Campaign analytics connect user actions to follow-up training
  • +Repeat behavior tracking helps identify users who keep clicking
  • +Role-based campaign targeting supports segmented awareness programs
  • +Template-based creation speeds up simulated phishing rollout
Cons
  • –Limited automation depth for complex approval and provisioning workflows
  • –Integration coverage can feel narrow for advanced identity and mail injection setups
  • –Reporting granularity may not match teams needing deep per-template audit trails
  • –Attachment and credential-harvesting scenarios may require more manual tuning

Best for: Fits when security teams run recurring simulated phishing campaigns and need clear click and report metrics.

#9

Phished

SMB

Automated phishing simulation and security awareness platform.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.4/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Follow-up campaign scheduling for repeat-offender tracking based on prior user outcomes.

Phished builds simulated phishing scenarios by combining templates with campaign configuration, then delivers them on a schedule.

Campaign reporting emphasizes operational metrics such as report rate and click-through rate, with result aggregation designed for security review.

User targeting can include follow-up runs so the same population can receive remedial experiences after an initial failure.

Pros
  • +Template workflow supports rapid build of link and attachment simulations
  • +Campaign analytics track report rate and click-through outcomes
  • +Repeat scheduling enables follow-up training for recurring failures
  • +Exports support security review workflows without extra tooling
Cons
  • –Admin configuration can require careful coordination across campaign variants
  • –Automation depth depends on available integration points rather than full API coverage
  • –User-level result actions are limited compared with training-first suites
  • –Advanced mailbox testing and delivery validation are not central to workflows

Best for: Fits when security teams want campaign analytics and repeat simulations with minimal training-system dependency.

#10

NINJIO

SMB

Security awareness training with phishing simulations and short-form lessons.

6.3/10
Overall
Features6.4/10
Ease of Use6.3/10
Value6.0/10
Standout feature

Built-in simulation scheduling and reporting workflow that ties simulated delivery outcomes to user reporting signals.

NINJIO targets email phishing simulation and awareness workflow with an emphasis on campaign creation, delivery, and results tracking for security teams. The workflow supports common phishing formats like link and attachment simulations, plus recurring campaign scheduling and user-level outcome reporting.

Reporting focuses on who received, who engaged, and who reported, which supports follow-up training decisions. Automation and integration options center on connecting campaign delivery to existing identity and email processes.

Pros
  • +Supports link and attachment phishing simulations within repeatable campaign runs
  • +Campaign analytics track delivery and user interaction outcomes for security review
  • +Includes mechanisms for driving user reporting behavior from simulated emails
  • +Scheduling supports recurring campaigns without rebuilding every run
Cons
  • –Admin setup requires careful alignment of delivery and reporting workflows
  • –Integration and automation surface is narrower than suites built for deep mail-system orchestration
  • –Template coverage and customization depth can feel limited for complex brand variants
  • –Role governance controls appear less granular than enterprise awareness governance needs

Best for: Fits when a security team needs repeatable phishing simulations with actionable reporting and scheduled follow-ups.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, Cofense PhishMe stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Cofense PhishMe

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right email phishing software

Security teams buying email phishing software typically need more than templates and analytics, because Cofense PhishMe turns phishing report-button signals into actionable outcomes tied to campaign results. This buyer’s guide also covers KnowBe4 for repeat-offender tracking across ongoing simulations, and Hoxhunt for outcome-driven remediation that changes the learning path based on report and click behavior.

The remaining entries address adjacent workflows like gateway suppression, Entra ID governed campaign controls, and simulation-to-admin alignment in mailbox administration. Each tool review below maps those differences to integration depth, automation and API surface, plus admin and governance controls that affect repeatability and control.

Email phishing software for simulation, reporting workflow triage, and remedial training outcomes

Email phishing software runs phishing simulation campaigns that send link-based, attachment-based, and other crafted messages to defined recipient groups, then measures report rate, click-through rate, and downstream remediation signals. Tools like Cofense PhishMe emphasize the phishing report-button workflow that connects user reports to measurable campaign outcomes, while Proofpoint Security Awareness Training also ties report handling to follow-on learning assignments. Buyer selection often hinges on how simulation execution and reporting connect to admin governance, because KnowBe4 and Hoxhunt both focus on repeat-offender tracking to drive future risk decisions.

Some platforms also extend phishing handling beyond training by applying policy-driven message enforcement at the gateway, which changes what reaches end users before simulations and user reporting can occur. Across the evaluated tools, the deciding factor is how well the simulation workflow, user reporting signals, and remediation actions stay governed under repeatable scheduling and access control.

Evaluation criteria for email phishing software simulation, reporting, and remediation control

Phishing awareness platforms succeed when simulation execution produces reportable outcomes and the platform maps those outcomes into remediation actions that administrators can govern. The most decision-relevant differences show up in the reporting workflow, how repeat behavior is tracked across campaign cycles, and how closely simulation tooling aligns with email security administration or tenant identity controls.

  • Phishing report-button to triage outcomes mapping

    Cofense PhishMe ties the phishing report button workflow into campaign outcomes so user reports become actionable signals. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training also connects report handling to campaign outcomes and drives follow-on learning assignments.

  • Repeat-offender tracking across scheduled simulations

    KnowBe4 uses repeat-offender tracking to connect future risk decisions to prior user report and click behavior across campaigns. Hoxhunt and PhishingBox both track repeat behavior across scheduled simulations to inform targeted remediation.

  • Campaign scheduling and recurring cycle governance

    KnowBe4 supports campaign scheduling for recurring simulation cycles without manual re-launches. Phished provides follow-up campaign scheduling for repeat-offender tracking based on prior user outcomes.

  • Outcome-driven remediation paths based on user behavior

    Hoxhunt changes the user learning path based on report and click behavior using interactive learning flows tied to campaign outcomes. Cofense PhishMe supports credential-harvesting simulation to assess end-to-end behavior before remediation paths get assigned.

  • Gateway-enforced inbound phishing suppression tied to delivery flow

    Barracuda Email Protection adds policy-driven message handling at the gateway with attachment and URL inspection plus quarantine and enforcement modes. Hornetsecurity focuses more on aligning phishing simulation outcomes with Hornetsecurity email security administration workflows rather than gateway suppression as the primary control.

Decision framework for choosing email phishing software that stays governed under repetition

Selection starts with the workflow that administrators need to run repeatedly, because simulation value declines when report signals do not map to defined remediation actions and when scheduling cannot be operated consistently. The second fork is integration depth into the organization’s existing identity and email control plane, because Microsoft Entra ID governed roles and mailbox-administration alignment change who can administer campaigns and how changes roll out safely.

  • Choose the primary measurement loop: report-button outcomes or click and report correlation

    If user reporting drives triage that the platform turns into campaign outcomes, Cofense PhishMe and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training are built around the phishing report-button workflow. If the key operational need is repeat behavior correlation using reported and clicked history, KnowBe4, Hoxhunt, and PhishingBox emphasize repeat-offender tracking across campaigns.

  • Pick the remediation logic philosophy: fixed assignment paths or outcome-driven learning flows

    If remediation must branch based on report and click behavior using interactive learning flows, Hoxhunt is aligned to outcome-driven follow-up training. If remediation depends on how training assignments connect internally, Cofense PhishMe remains strongest when the organization can wire assignments to outcomes without losing the remedial impact.

  • Select the operational cadence: recurring scheduling or follow-up scheduling tied to prior outcomes

    If administrators want recurring phishing simulation cycles without manual re-launches, KnowBe4 provides campaign scheduling that supports repeat cycles. If the operational model centers on follow-up runs after prior user outcomes, Phished supports follow-up campaign scheduling for repeat-offender tracking.

  • Align with the email control plane: gateway suppression or mailbox policy governance alignment

    If inbound phishing suppression must happen before simulations and user reporting, Barracuda Email Protection focuses on attachment and URL inspection at the gateway with quarantine and enforcement decisions. If phishing simulation administration should align with email security administration workflows, Hornetsecurity ties campaign analytics including report button and recipient outcomes to Hornetsecurity administration.

  • Match tenant governance requirements to identity permissions and reporting views

    If the environment depends on Microsoft Entra ID permissions and Microsoft 365-aligned reporting views, Microsoft Attack Simulation Training provides role-based admin controls integrated with Entra ID tenancy. If governance depth matters less than repeatable simulation scheduling and reporting workflows, NINJIO emphasizes repeatable runs with scheduled follow-ups.

Who should buy email phishing software for simulation and remediation outcomes

Security teams need email phishing software that connects simulated delivery to user actions, then maps those actions into remediation work that administrators can administer and verify through campaign analytics. The best fit varies by how organizations run repeated campaigns, how they manage report-button triage, and how closely the phishing program aligns with identity governance or email security administration.

  • SOC and security awareness operators managing a report-button triage workflow

    Cofense PhishMe and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training connect the phishing report button workflow to campaign outcomes and remedial follow-on learning assignments, which supports actionable triage reporting.

  • Teams running recurring simulated phishing with repeat-focused remediation

    KnowBe4, Hoxhunt, and PhishingBox all use repeat-offender tracking across scheduled simulations so future risk decisions can reflect prior report and click behavior.

  • Email security teams that want simulation aligned to gateway or mailbox administration

    Barracuda Email Protection supports policy-driven inbound phishing suppression at the gateway with quarantine and enforcement tied to delivery flow, while Hornetsecurity aligns simulation outcomes with email security administration workflows.

  • Microsoft 365 tenants requiring governed admin access tied to Entra ID

    Microsoft Attack Simulation Training provides tenant-integrated campaign governance with Entra ID permissions and Microsoft 365-aligned reporting views.

Common buying and deployment pitfalls for email phishing software

Email phishing simulation programs fail most often when reporting signals do not connect to remediation actions, when scheduling is not repeatable, or when administration permissions are too broad or too narrow to operate safely. The next most common failure is treating simulation tooling as a standalone training widget instead of integrating it with email delivery control and identity governance for ongoing governance.

  • Picking a simulator based on template variety while ignoring how user reports become campaign outcomes

    Cofense PhishMe and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training both emphasize the phishing report button workflow, so template coverage alone should not replace a clear report-to-triage mapping.

  • Running one-off simulations without a repeatable scheduling model or repeat-offender learning path

    KnowBe4 and PhishingBox support recurring or repeat-focused campaigns, while Phished specifically ties follow-up scheduling to prior user outcomes for repeat behavior targeting.

  • Allowing multi-team access without an RBAC and governance plan for campaign administration

    KnowBe4 calls out that multi-team setup needs careful RBAC planning to avoid broad access, and Microsoft Attack Simulation Training adds an Entra ID permissions model that also requires role discipline.

  • Assuming gateway suppression or mailbox policy governance is covered by the phishing platform alone

    Barracuda Email Protection is designed for policy-driven message handling at the gateway with attachment and URL inspection, while Hornetsecurity focuses on alignment with its email security administration workflows rather than standalone inbound suppression.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated phishing simulation platforms on features at 40%, ease at 30%, and value at 30% using the provided scores for Cofense PhishMe, KnowBe4, Hoxhunt, and the remaining entries. We ranked Cofense PhishMe highest because its phishing report-button workflow turns user reports into actionable signals tied to campaign outcomes, and its credential-harvesting simulation supports controlled end-to-end assessment.

We also weighed KnowBe4’s repeat-offender tracking and campaign scheduling for recurring cycles, plus Hoxhunt’s outcome-driven remediation that changes the learning path based on report and click behavior. We kept the ranking tied to these score inputs and the named standout workflows across the ten tools.

Frequently Asked Questions About email phishing software

How do Cofense PhishMe and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training handle user-reported phishing events?
Cofense PhishMe routes the phishing report button workflow into campaign outcomes so security teams can triage what users reported across cohorts. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training also supports phishing report button handling, then ties those reports to remedial education assignments driven by user behavior patterns.
When should Microsoft Attack Simulation Training be chosen over Hoxhunt for tenant administration and governance?
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training fits when a security team needs governed campaign workflows aligned to Entra ID permissions and Microsoft 365 reporting views. Hoxhunt fits when follow-up learning must change based on report and click behavior using interactive user journeys after those outcomes.
Which tool provides repeat-offender tracking that connects future targeting to prior report and click outcomes?
KnowBe4 provides repeat-offender tracking that links user report and click behavior to future risk decisions across campaigns. PhishingBox provides repeat behavior tracking for iterative awareness programs, but KnowBe4 is more explicitly tied to repeat-offender selection and ongoing susceptibility analysis.
What breaks if email phishing simulation depends on directory synchronization, when directory groups change frequently?
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training and KnowBe4 can depend on group targeting patterns that reflect identity directories, so stale group membership can skew who receives a simulated phishing campaign. Hoxhunt mitigates this with integration options for identity and device groups that support governed targeting, but frequent directory churn still requires configuration discipline to keep group mappings current.
How does Barracuda Email Protection differ from phishing simulation platforms like Cofense PhishMe for attachment and URL handling?
Barracuda Email Protection enforces policy at the mail gateway by inspecting URLs and attachments, then applies quarantine and enforcement modes based on delivery flow. Cofense PhishMe focuses on email phishing simulation content and campaign analytics, so it does not replace gateway enforcement for inbound phishing suppression.
Which platform supports both link-based and attachment-based simulation while keeping admin rollout controlled by groups?
Hornetsecurity supports link-based and attachment-based scenarios with guided configuration for recurring runs and controlled rollout to groups. NINJIO also supports link and attachment simulations with scheduled campaign delivery, but Hornetsecurity’s operational alignment with email security administration workflows is the differentiator.
How do Cofense PhishMe and Phished structure follow-up campaigns for users who fail the initial simulation?
Cofense PhishMe ties the phishing report button workflow to measurable campaign outcomes, then supports targeted remedial action based on those results. Phished schedules follow-up experiences for users who fail so repeat simulations can enroll users into additional scenarios tied to report rate and click-through rate.
When do security teams use Hoxhunt’s credential-harvesting scenario templates instead of generic phishing templates?
Hoxhunt supports templates for credential-harvesting scenarios, and it drives outcome-driven remediation that changes the learning path after report or click actions. Other tools such as KnowBe4 emphasize template libraries and scheduled campaigns, but Hoxhunt’s interactive user journeys make the scenario outcome handling a primary workflow.
What integration patterns matter most when tying simulation analytics into existing email and identity operations?
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training emphasizes tenant integration with Entra ID permissions and Microsoft 365-aligned reporting views for simulation and training separation. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training integrates into enterprise identity and email environments to reduce manual scheduling and distribution effort, while NINJIO focuses on connecting campaign delivery to existing identity and email processes with automation and integration options.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.