GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Testing Software of 2026
Find the best phishing testing tools to boost security. Compare, review, and choose the right fit—start now.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Attack Simulation and Phishing Training (KnowBe4)
Automated campaign reporting with user-level remediation and training assignment
Built for organizations running continuous phishing tests and measurable security awareness remediation.
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Attack Simulation Training campaign reports that combine click rates with user reporting and training progress
Built for microsoft 365 shops needing measurable phishing testing with automated training.
Infosec IQ
Phishing campaign workflow with built-in engagement tracking and retraining follow-ups
Built for security and training teams running recurring phishing simulations and follow-up awareness.
Related reading
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Test Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Security Testing Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Campaign Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Training Software of 2026
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates phishing testing and phishing training tools, including KnowBe4 Attack Simulation and training, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Infosec IQ, PHISHTANK, GoPhish, and other platforms. Readers can scan key capabilities like attack simulation, user training workflows, reporting and analytics, and integration with email and identity environments to match the tool to their security goals.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attack Simulation and Phishing Training (KnowBe4) Delivers phishing simulations and security awareness training with reporting that tracks click rates, credential misuse, and user engagement. | enterprise training | 9.0/10 | 9.3/10 | 8.8/10 | 8.7/10 |
| 2 | Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training Runs managed phishing simulations and training directly within Microsoft 365 workflows with analytics for reported messages and user responses. | Microsoft 365 | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 3 | Infosec IQ Provides phishing simulation campaigns and automated education content with dashboards for behavioral metrics and campaign outcomes. | phishing simulations | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 4 | PHISHTANK Helps organizations validate and investigate phishing URLs by managing submissions and reviewing reputational status. | phishing URL validation | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 | 8.1/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 5 | GoPhish Runs self-hosted phishing simulation campaigns with templates, landing pages, and basic reporting on recipients and outcomes. | self-hosted framework | 7.6/10 | 7.1/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 6 | Evilginx Simulates real-world phishing and credential capture workflows by man-in-the-middle proxying of authentication sessions. | adversary simulation | 7.3/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.4/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 7 | Tines Automates security workflows that can include phishing testing steps for message generation, tracking, and response orchestration. | automation platform | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 8 | PowerDMARC Tests and monitors email authentication controls and spoofing resistance that supports safer phishing simulation planning. | email security testing | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 9 | Darktrace Detects phishing-related malicious behavior using enterprise cyber analytics and supports incident response workflows tied to email threats. | detection and response | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.1/10 | 7.3/10 |
| 10 | Vade Secure Stops phishing and impersonation attacks via AI email filtering while providing reporting that supports phishing-risk reduction testing. | anti-phishing | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.8/10 |
Delivers phishing simulations and security awareness training with reporting that tracks click rates, credential misuse, and user engagement.
Runs managed phishing simulations and training directly within Microsoft 365 workflows with analytics for reported messages and user responses.
Provides phishing simulation campaigns and automated education content with dashboards for behavioral metrics and campaign outcomes.
Helps organizations validate and investigate phishing URLs by managing submissions and reviewing reputational status.
Runs self-hosted phishing simulation campaigns with templates, landing pages, and basic reporting on recipients and outcomes.
Simulates real-world phishing and credential capture workflows by man-in-the-middle proxying of authentication sessions.
Automates security workflows that can include phishing testing steps for message generation, tracking, and response orchestration.
Tests and monitors email authentication controls and spoofing resistance that supports safer phishing simulation planning.
Detects phishing-related malicious behavior using enterprise cyber analytics and supports incident response workflows tied to email threats.
Stops phishing and impersonation attacks via AI email filtering while providing reporting that supports phishing-risk reduction testing.
Attack Simulation and Phishing Training (KnowBe4)
enterprise trainingDelivers phishing simulations and security awareness training with reporting that tracks click rates, credential misuse, and user engagement.
Automated campaign reporting with user-level remediation and training assignment
KnowBe4 stands out with broad, end-to-end phishing simulation and security awareness delivery managed through a single training ecosystem. The platform combines targeted phish testing with automated reporting, remediation workflows, and ongoing user training that follows each campaign. It supports template-driven phishing emails, landing page simulation, and credential-harvest style test flows used to measure susceptibility. Administrator dashboards consolidate metrics across departments, users, and campaigns for repeatable testing and improvement cycles.
Pros
- Comprehensive phishing simulation with email templates and campaign management
- Actionable reporting that ties user behavior to training outcomes
- Automated remediation workflows after clicks and risky actions
Cons
- Advanced logic for targeted campaigns can take training to configure
- Landing page and credential test flows add complexity to governance
- Large tenant reporting can feel dense without careful dashboard setup
Best For
Organizations running continuous phishing tests and measurable security awareness remediation
More related reading
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Microsoft 365Runs managed phishing simulations and training directly within Microsoft 365 workflows with analytics for reported messages and user responses.
Attack Simulation Training campaign reports that combine click rates with user reporting and training progress
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training stands out because phishing simulations and training live inside the Microsoft 365 security experience. The product runs recurring simulations, tracks user clicks and reporting behavior, and routes results into role-based reports for security teams. It supports policies that govern which users get which simulations and includes automated training messages that trigger after clicks. The solution is tightly connected to Microsoft 365 identities and mail flow, which simplifies targeting and measurement for Exchange Online environments.
Pros
- End-to-end phishing simulations tied to Microsoft 365 user identity and mailbox behavior
- Built-in click and report metrics with dashboards for security and training outcomes
- Automated training triggered after simulated user actions
- Centralized policy targeting across mailboxes and user groups
- Template-based simulation setup reduces time-to-first campaign
Cons
- Simulation and training configuration requires careful policy design to avoid mis-targeting
- Reporting and training workflows can feel less flexible than dedicated simulation point tools
- Advanced customization outside the standard campaign model is limited
Best For
Microsoft 365 shops needing measurable phishing testing with automated training
Infosec IQ
phishing simulationsProvides phishing simulation campaigns and automated education content with dashboards for behavioral metrics and campaign outcomes.
Phishing campaign workflow with built-in engagement tracking and retraining follow-ups
Infosec IQ stands out for combining phishing simulation with security awareness workflows in a single place for managing campaigns. Core capabilities include creating phishing templates, targeting user groups, and tracking engagement through click and report events. The tool supports iterative testing cycles so teams can run follow ups after remediation and retraining. Reporting and administrative controls focus on repeatable outcomes across departments rather than one-off assessments.
Pros
- Campaign and template management supports repeat phishing testing cycles
- Engagement tracking covers clicks and user actions for actionable reporting
- Administrative controls enable consistent targeting across departments
Cons
- Setup workflows can feel heavier than simpler phishing-only tools
- Template customization options may require more configuration effort
- Reporting depth is less flexible than platforms focused solely on analytics
Best For
Security and training teams running recurring phishing simulations and follow-up awareness
More related reading
PHISHTANK
phishing URL validationHelps organizations validate and investigate phishing URLs by managing submissions and reviewing reputational status.
Confirmed phishing URL listing with direct lookup support via the public database
PHISHTANK stands out for validating phishing reports through community submissions and a shared database of confirmed phishing URLs. The core capability centers on checking whether a specific URL is listed as phishing and on submitting URLs for verification. Operationally, it supports incident response workflows by providing a quick lookup of known bad links rather than full phishing simulation or reporting automation.
Pros
- Fast URL checks against a corpus of confirmed phishing links
- Simple submission workflow for contributing phishing indicators
- Publicly accessible phishing dataset supports quick triage and blocking decisions
Cons
- No end-to-end phishing campaign simulation or user training features
- Relies on external reports, so brand new phishing URLs may be absent
- Limited analytics for measuring click rates, reporting outcomes, and remediation
Best For
Teams needing confirmed phishing URL lookup for triage and blocking
GoPhish
self-hosted frameworkRuns self-hosted phishing simulation campaigns with templates, landing pages, and basic reporting on recipients and outcomes.
Email campaign tracking for opens and clicks per recipient
GoPhish stands out for its straightforward setup of phishing simulations that run directly against target mailboxes. It supports creating campaigns with email templates, tracking opens and clicks, and assigning recipients through import lists. It also provides basic reporting views and can integrate with external user management through CSV handling and webhook-style notifications.
Pros
- Campaign builder supports templates, send schedules, and recipient import workflows
- Landing-page and link tracking identifies opens and clicked URLs per recipient
- Simple reporting shows engagement trends across campaigns and cohorts
Cons
- Limited analysis beyond basic engagement metrics like open and click events
- Template and content customization lacks advanced targeting logic and segmentation
- Deliverability controls and safe sending features are basic compared with enterprise platforms
Best For
Teams running repeat phishing simulations with light segmentation and quick reporting
Evilginx
adversary simulationSimulates real-world phishing and credential capture workflows by man-in-the-middle proxying of authentication sessions.
Evilginx 2 reverse proxy token harvesting and session replay via authentication callbacks
Evilginx focuses on phishing simulation by acting as a reverse proxy that can capture and reuse authentication tokens during login flows. It supports man-in-the-middle style credential capture while enabling session hijacking behavior through token harvesting and replay. The tool is most effective for testing weaknesses around multi-factor authentication, session handling, and redirect or callback security in identity-provider logins.
Pros
- Reverse proxy approach enables realistic token capture and replay testing
- Supports multi-step login flows that mirror real identity provider behavior
- Session hijack style verification tests defenses beyond password entry
Cons
- Setup and correct routing require careful technical configuration
- Usability favors operators with security and web proxy expertise
- Not a complete end-to-end phishing campaign management platform
Best For
Security teams testing authentication resilience against token theft and replay
More related reading
Tines
automation platformAutomates security workflows that can include phishing testing steps for message generation, tracking, and response orchestration.
Outcome-triggered automation that runs remediation workflows after simulated email interactions
Tines stands out by combining phishing simulation with automated response workflows in the same visual automation system. It supports triggering actions off user interactions, so a failed phishing test can lead directly to targeted remediation steps. Core phishing testing capabilities include creating email-based scenarios, tracking outcomes, and orchestrating downstream tasks across tools. Built-in workflow logic reduces manual coordination between security teams and IT or training channels.
Pros
- Workflow automation links phishing outcomes to immediate remediation actions
- Visual builder supports branching logic without scripting for common scenarios
- Integrations let tests coordinate with collaboration, ticketing, and identity systems
- Outcome tracking supports iterative improvement of simulation campaigns
Cons
- Phishing-specific reporting depends on configuration and connected data sources
- Complex multi-step scenarios take time to design and validate
- Not optimized as a standalone phishing tool compared with specialist platforms
Best For
Teams automating phishing education and remediation workflows across multiple systems
PowerDMARC
email security testingTests and monitors email authentication controls and spoofing resistance that supports safer phishing simulation planning.
Phishing campaign reporting tied to DMARC and email authentication visibility
PowerDMARC distinguishes itself with deliverability-focused phishing simulations and email security automation built around DMARC policy analysis. The platform generates phishing test templates, sends controlled campaigns, and provides reporting to measure who clicks and how users respond. It also connects simulation outcomes with domain authentication signals to improve overall security posture. Teams can tune targeting and repeat testing to reduce future susceptibility to phishing.
Pros
- Phishing simulation reporting tracks click behavior and campaign outcomes
- Domain authentication context helps align tests with real deliverability risks
- Flexible templates support repeated, varied phishing scenarios
Cons
- Setup requires multiple security inputs beyond just running simulations
- Reporting depth can feel complex for small teams
- Advanced targeting and customization increase operational overhead
Best For
Security teams running DMARC-aligned phishing simulations with measurable user testing
More related reading
Darktrace
detection and responseDetects phishing-related malicious behavior using enterprise cyber analytics and supports incident response workflows tied to email threats.
Enterprise Immune System that detects anomalous user and entity behavior tied to phishing outcomes
Darktrace differentiates itself with autonomous detection using Enterprise Immune System and graph-based behavioral analytics rather than relying on static phishing signatures. It supports phishing testing by modeling real attacker patterns, then monitoring enterprise-wide responses across email, users, and endpoints. The platform can generate and prioritize alerts around suspicious social engineering activity, including anomalous login behavior and message-driven process changes.
Pros
- Behavioral graph analytics flags phishing effects across identity and endpoint activity
- Enterprise Immune System supports adaptive detection of novel social engineering patterns
- High-signal investigations correlate suspicious email-driven behavior with subsequent actions
Cons
- Phishing testing workflows depend on alert tuning and incident triage maturity
- Administrator setup for behavioral baselines can add time before stable results
- Coverage is strongest for detection response, with less emphasis on campaign simulation
Best For
Security teams validating phishing resilience through detection and response correlation
Vade Secure
anti-phishingStops phishing and impersonation attacks via AI email filtering while providing reporting that supports phishing-risk reduction testing.
Mailbox-first phishing testing tightly aligned to Vade email filtering behavior
Vade Secure focuses on phishing testing built around mailbox-first protection testing, so campaigns can target the same user workflows that trigger real-world risk. The platform emphasizes pre-delivery filtering simulation and user-level engagement reporting to validate both policy effectiveness and end-user behavior. Phishing test creation and delivery are designed to be operationally repeatable for security teams that want measurable outcomes, not just template sending. Reporting centers on click and reporting signals to support remediation and training loops.
Pros
- Mailbox-aligned phishing testing targets the same entry points users experience
- Reporting captures click and user response signals for measurable remediation
- Campaign execution supports repeatable testing cycles for ongoing controls validation
- Workflow outcomes link phishing simulation to defense effectiveness checks
Cons
- Setup complexity can increase when aligning tests with specific security controls
- Less emphasis on advanced customization compared with dedicated simulation specialists
- Reporting depth may require tuning to match detailed internal testing metrics
Best For
Security teams validating email security controls with measurable user engagement outcomes
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, Attack Simulation and Phishing Training (KnowBe4) stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Phishing Testing Software
This buyer's guide helps security and training teams choose phishing testing software using concrete capabilities found in KnowBe4, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Infosec IQ, PHISHTANK, GoPhish, Evilginx, Tines, PowerDMARC, Darktrace, and Vade Secure. It covers how simulation design, reporting depth, automation, and detection correlation change the quality of measurable outcomes. It also explains who each tool fits best and which pitfalls to avoid before deploying campaigns.
What Is Phishing Testing Software?
Phishing testing software runs controlled phishing simulations to measure who clicks, who reports, and what training or remediation happens afterward. It can also generate and validate phishing URLs or model real-world attacker behavior to support detection and response validation. Teams typically use it to reduce user susceptibility through measurable security awareness workflows, like KnowBe4 and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training. Some solutions also focus on deliverability-aligned testing and email authentication context, like PowerDMARC and Vade Secure.
Key Features to Look For
The right phishing testing tool connects simulated user actions to measurable outcomes and usable follow-up workflows.
End-to-end phishing simulation with templates and campaign management
Campaign templates and repeatable execution decide how consistently phishing tests can be run across departments and time. KnowBe4 supports template-driven phishing emails and campaign management inside a single training ecosystem, and GoPhish supports campaign creation with email templates plus send schedules and recipient import lists.
User-level click and report analytics tied to outcomes
Measuring clicks and reporting behavior at the user level enables targeted remediation instead of generic awareness messaging. KnowBe4 reports click rates, credential misuse, and engagement signals, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training combines click rates with user reporting and training progress in campaign reports.
Automated remediation and training workflows after simulation actions
Automated follow-up turns test results into behavior change without manual coordination. KnowBe4 includes automated remediation workflows after clicks and risky actions, and Tines can trigger outcome-driven remediation workflows directly from phishing test interactions.
Governed targeting and policy-driven user assignment
Controlled targeting prevents mis-targeting and improves comparability between test cycles. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training supports centralized policy targeting across mailboxes and user groups, and Infosec IQ provides administrative controls for consistent targeting across departments.
Landing page and multi-step test flows for realistic user behavior
Landing page and multi-step flows expose weaknesses that basic email-only simulations miss. KnowBe4 adds landing page simulation and credential-harvest style test flows, and Evilginx enables multi-step authentication flows that mirror identity-provider behavior using reverse proxy token capture and replay.
Security control context using deliverability signals or detection correlation
Control-aligned testing helps connect phishing resilience to how defenses actually work in production. PowerDMARC ties phishing campaign reporting to DMARC and email authentication visibility, Vade Secure aligns mailbox-first phishing testing with email filtering behavior, and Darktrace uses Enterprise Immune System and behavioral graph analytics to correlate phishing-related activity with enterprise response.
How to Choose the Right Phishing Testing Software
Pick based on which measurable outcomes must improve, then choose the tool that already models those outcomes end-to-end.
Define the measurable outcome to improve
If the goal is reducing user susceptibility through repeatable security awareness cycles with remediation assignment, KnowBe4 and Infosec IQ focus on phishing campaigns plus engagement tracking and follow-up retraining. If the goal is measurable phishing testing inside Microsoft 365 workflows with training triggered after simulated user actions, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training connects click and reporting behavior to role-based campaign reporting.
Match the simulation depth to the threats being tested
For email and landing page susceptibility testing with credential misuse-style flows, KnowBe4 supports landing page simulation and credential-harvest style test flows. For identity and session resilience testing, Evilginx performs man-in-the-middle proxying that captures and replays authentication tokens, which directly exercises defenses around multi-factor authentication and session handling.
Choose the reporting model that enables action
If security teams must see campaign results that drive immediate remediation and training, KnowBe4 provides automated campaign reporting with user-level remediation and training assignment. If teams already run broader security automation and need phishing outcomes to feed orchestration, Tines supports visual workflow automation that can branch and trigger remediation after simulated email interactions.
Align the testing scope with your email stack and identity stack
For organizations that want phishing tests tied to Exchange Online mail flow and Microsoft identities, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training supports recurring simulations using mailbox behavior and user identity for measurement. For deliverability-aligned testing that accounts for DMARC policy and email authentication risks, PowerDMARC supports templates and reporting tied to DMARC and authentication visibility.
Decide if detection validation is part of the job
If validation must include whether enterprise detection and response correlates suspicious activity with phishing outcomes, Darktrace uses Enterprise Immune System and behavioral graph analytics to generate and prioritize alerts around social engineering effects. If validation is focused on confirming or triaging known phishing URLs for blocking decisions, PHISHTANK supports confirmed phishing URL lookup and submission workflows rather than user training campaigns.
Who Needs Phishing Testing Software?
Different teams need phishing testing software for different parts of the security lifecycle, from user education to detection and incident response validation.
Organizations running continuous phishing tests with user training remediation loops
KnowBe4 fits organizations that need continuous phishing simulations plus automated campaign reporting that assigns user-level remediation and training after clicks and risky actions. Infosec IQ fits teams that run recurring phishing simulation cycles with built-in engagement tracking and retraining follow-ups across departments.
Microsoft 365 security teams that want phishing simulation and training inside Microsoft workflows
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training fits Microsoft 365 shops that need phishing simulations tied to Microsoft 365 identities and mailbox behavior. It supports policy-governed targeting and campaign reports that combine click rates with user reporting and training progress.
Security teams needing deliverability and domain authentication context for simulation planning
PowerDMARC fits teams that want phishing simulation reporting tied to DMARC and email authentication visibility so tests reflect real deliverability and spoofing resistance risks. Vade Secure fits teams that want mailbox-first phishing testing aligned to the same entry point that Vade email filtering controls protect.
Teams automating phishing response workflows across collaboration, ticketing, and identity systems
Tines fits teams that want phishing outcomes to trigger remediation actions using a visual automation builder with branching logic. It is well matched when simulation results must immediately orchestrate downstream tasks across other security and IT systems.
Security and identity teams testing token theft, session replay, and multi-step login resilience
Evilginx fits security teams that need realistic authentication testing using reverse proxy token harvesting and session replay behavior via authentication callbacks. It is designed for validating defenses around multi-factor authentication, session handling, and redirect or callback security in identity-provider logins.
Teams validating detection and response correlations tied to phishing-related behavior
Darktrace fits security teams that need detection validation by modeling attacker patterns and monitoring enterprise-wide responses across email, users, and endpoints. It uses Enterprise Immune System and graph-based behavioral analytics to correlate phishing effects with subsequent actions.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Phishing testing projects fail when the tool selection ignores how results must be acted on, how campaigns are governed, or how deep the simulation must go.
Buying a phishing-only tool without a remediation and training path
Campaigns that only track opens and clicks do not guarantee measurable improvement because they lack automated next-step actions. GoPhish provides email campaign tracking for opens and clicks per recipient, so it needs a separate process for remediation and user education, while KnowBe4 and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training include automated training triggered after simulated user actions.
Running simulations without governance for targeting
Uncontrolled targeting makes it hard to compare results across departments and can send tests to the wrong groups. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training uses policy-based targeting across mailboxes and user groups, and Infosec IQ emphasizes administrative controls for consistent targeting across departments.
Assuming email-only testing covers identity and session threats
Basic email simulations cannot validate defenses around authentication token theft and session replay. Evilginx performs reverse proxy token capture and replay during authentication flows, which is the appropriate tool class for multi-step login resilience testing.
Treating phishing URL validation as a substitute for user simulation
Confirmed URL lookup helps triage and blocking but does not produce measurable user training outcomes. PHISHTANK is built for confirmed phishing URL listing and lookup, so it should complement rather than replace campaign platforms like KnowBe4 or Vade Secure when user behavior change is the goal.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. features carries a weight of 0.4. ease of use carries a weight of 0.3. value carries a weight of 0.3. the overall score is the weighted average using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Attack Simulation and Phishing Training (KnowBe4) separated itself with automated campaign reporting that ties user behavior to training outcomes and remediation assignment, which strengthens both features and practical usability because each campaign leads to measurable next steps instead of only engagement metrics.
Frequently Asked Questions About Phishing Testing Software
What tool best supports continuous phishing testing with measurable remediation workflows?
KnowBe4 fits continuous testing because it runs end-to-end phishing simulations and ties campaign results to automated reporting, remediation workflows, and ongoing security awareness training in one ecosystem. Tines can also automate remediation after simulated interactions, but KnowBe4 centralizes user-level outcomes and training assignments for repeatable cycles.
Which phishing testing platform fits a Microsoft 365 environment with minimal identity and targeting overhead?
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training fits Microsoft 365 shops because simulations and training run inside the Microsoft 365 security experience. It connects to Microsoft 365 identities and mail flow, and it produces role-based reports that combine click rates with user reporting and training progress.
Which solution is most suitable for running follow-up simulations after users are retrained?
Infosec IQ supports iterative phishing testing cycles that follow remediation and retraining. It tracks engagement through click and report events and emphasizes follow-up campaigns instead of one-off assessments.
Which tool should be used for phishing URL triage when a confirmed list is needed?
PHISHTANK fits triage because it validates phishing reports using community submissions and a shared database of confirmed phishing URLs. It focuses on quick lookup and verification workflows rather than running full phishing simulations or automated user reporting.
Which option provides the simplest setup for mail-based phishing simulations against target mailboxes?
GoPhish fits lightweight testing because it builds email templates into campaigns that run directly against target mailboxes. It tracks opens and clicks per recipient and supports recipient segmentation through import lists and basic external user management via CSV.
What phishing testing tool targets authentication weaknesses around token theft and session replay?
Evilginx targets authentication resilience because it acts as a reverse proxy that can capture and reuse authentication tokens during login flows. Evilginx 2 supports man-in-the-middle style token harvesting and session replay via authentication callbacks, making it effective for testing multi-factor enforcement, session handling, and redirect protections.
Which platform helps automate security and IT tasks based on user interaction outcomes from phishing tests?
Tines fits outcome-triggered automation because it orchestrates downstream remediation steps directly from phishing test outcomes. It triggers actions based on user interactions, so a failed simulation can route tasks across tools without manual coordination.
Which tool is best aligned with DMARC-driven email authentication visibility for phishing simulations?
PowerDMARC fits teams that want phishing testing tied to email authentication signals because it centers on DMARC policy analysis. It generates phishing test templates, delivers controlled campaigns, and reports who clicked while linking results to domain authentication visibility for measurable improvement.
Which phishing testing approach is strongest for validating detection and response rather than just user click rates?
Darktrace fits resilience validation because it uses enterprise behavior analytics and an autonomous detection model rather than static phishing signatures. It supports phishing testing by modeling attacker patterns and correlating enterprise-wide responses across email, users, and endpoints with alert prioritization.
Which product is best for mailbox-first testing that mirrors how real email filtering behaves before delivery?
Vade Secure fits mailbox-first testing because it emphasizes pre-delivery filtering simulation aligned to Vade email protection behavior. It delivers phishing tests in a way that validates both policy effectiveness and user engagement signals, then feeds click and reporting outcomes into remediation and training loops.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.