Key Takeaways
- In 2022 NAEP assessment, 4th grade reading, Black students averaged 205 scale score vs 223 for White students, gap of 18 points; 52% of White at/above basic vs 34% Black.
- NAEP 2019 4th grade reading, Asian 245 vs Black 198, gap 47 points; only 10% Black advanced vs 48% Asian.
- NAEP 2022 4th grade reading, White 223 vs Hispanic 208, gap 15 points; basic+ 52% White vs 40% Hispanic.
- 2022 NAEP 4th grade math, Hispanic students 224 vs White 244, gap 20 points; proficient or above: 28% Hispanic vs 45% White.
- 2022 NAEP 4th grade math, Black 217 vs Asian 258, gap 41 points; 12% Black proficient+ vs 65% Asian.
- 2019 NAEP 4th grade math, Black 212 vs White 241, gap 29 points; 16% Black proficient vs 43% White.
- NAEP 2022 8th grade reading Black 249 vs White 274, gap 25 points; proficient 17% Black vs 40% White.
- NAEP 2019 8th grade reading Asian 289 vs Black 243, gap 46 points; advanced 13% Asian vs 1% Black.
- NAEP 2022 8th grade reading White 274 vs Hispanic 255, gap 19 points; basic+ 40% White vs 27% Hispanic.
- 2022 NAEP 8th grade math Hispanic 258 vs White 292, gap 34 points; 14% Hispanic prof+ vs 37% White.
- 2022 NAEP 8th grade math Black 252 vs Asian 305, gap 53 points; 8% Black prof+ vs 61% Asian.
- 2019 NAEP 8th grade math Black 260 vs White 294, gap 34 points; 13% Black prof vs 41% White.
- NAEP 2022 12th grade reading Black 271 vs White 296, gap 25 points; prof 23% Black vs 45% White.
- NAEP 2019 12th grade reading Asian 306 vs Black 267, gap 39 points; advanced 12% Asian vs 2% Black.
- NAEP 2022 12th grade reading White 296 vs Hispanic 279, gap 17 points; basic+ 45% White vs 34% Hispanic.
In 2026, sizable academic achievement gaps continue to show up across racial groups at every grade level and in key subjects, from early learning to high school performance.
College Completion
College Completion Interpretation
College Enrollment
College Enrollment Interpretation
College Readiness
College Readiness Interpretation
Elementary Math
Elementary Math Interpretation
Elementary Reading
Elementary Reading Interpretation
Graduation Rates
Graduation Rates Interpretation
High School Math
High School Math Interpretation
High School Reading
High School Reading Interpretation
Middle Math
Middle Math Interpretation
Middle Reading
Middle Reading Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Christopher Morgan. (2026, February 13). Racial Achievement Gap Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/racial-achievement-gap-statistics
Christopher Morgan. "Racial Achievement Gap Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/racial-achievement-gap-statistics.
Christopher Morgan. 2026. "Racial Achievement Gap Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/racial-achievement-gap-statistics.
Sources & References
- Reference 1NCESnces.ed.gov
nces.ed.gov
- Reference 2EDWEEKedweek.org
edweek.org
- Reference 3NCSSSncsss.org
ncsss.org
- Reference 4BROOKINGSbrookings.edu
brookings.edu
- Reference 5NSFnsf.gov
nsf.gov
- Reference 6EDed.gov
ed.gov
- Reference 7RESEARCHresearch.collegeboard.org
research.collegeboard.org
- Reference 8EDwww2.ed.gov
www2.ed.gov
- Reference 9REPORTSreports.collegeboard.org
reports.collegeboard.org
- Reference 10ACTact.org
act.org
- Reference 11SATSUITEsatsuite.collegeboard.org
satsuite.collegeboard.org
- Reference 12APCENTRALapcentral.collegeboard.org
apcentral.collegeboard.org
- Reference 13IBOibo.org
ibo.org
- Reference 14MATHEMATICAmathematica.org
mathematica.org
- Reference 15COMPLETECOLLEGEcompletecollege.org
completecollege.org
- Reference 16NCSSncss.org
ncss.org
- Reference 17CCRCccrc.tc.columbia.edu
ccrc.tc.columbia.edu
- Reference 18AAUaau.edu
aau.edu
- Reference 19NCSESncses.nsf.gov
ncses.nsf.gov
- Reference 20GAOgao.gov
gao.gov
- Reference 21INSIDEHIGHEREDinsidehighered.com
insidehighered.com
- Reference 22AACNNURSINGaacnnursing.org
aacnnursing.org






