Picture a nation where the color of your skin dramatically shifts the odds of a routine drive becoming a police encounter—a reality starkly illuminated by data revealing that Black drivers in Oakland are stopped at double their population rate, Hispanic drivers in L.A. County are 1.5 times more likely to be pulled over than white drivers, and disparities in searches and low contraband hit rates persist from coast to coast.
Key Takeaways
- In 2019, Black drivers in Oakland, California were stopped at 19.8% of traffic stops despite comprising only 9.7% of the local population
- A 2020 study found that Hispanic drivers in Los Angeles County were 1.5 times more likely to be stopped for traffic violations than white drivers, controlling for driving patterns
- In Ferguson, Missouri, from 2012-2014, African Americans accounted for 85% of vehicle stops while making up 67% of the population
- In 2019, during traffic stops in North Carolina, contraband was found in only 21% of Black driver searches vs 29% for whites
- Illinois State Police 2020: Search hit rate for Latinos 18%, whites 24%
- New Jersey 2019: Black search yield 22.5%, white 27.1%
- In 2018 BJS data, 12% of traffic stops resulted in citations nationwide
- Stanford study: 50.5% of stops end in warning only, 2015-2020 average
- California 2021: 58% warnings, 35% citations, 7% arrests from stops
- In 2020, 2.1% of traffic stops nationwide involved use of force according to BJS
- Minneapolis pre-2020: 0.3% stops with force, higher for Black drivers at 0.5%
- California POST 2021: Force used in 1.2% of stops statewide
- Nationwide 2018, 78% of stops daytime, 22% nighttime per Stanford
- Urban areas 65% of all traffic stops in US 2019 BJS, rural 20%, suburban 15%
- California 2021: 45% stops on weekends, 55% weekdays
Racial disparities in traffic stops are widespread across many major American cities.
Citation and Warning Outcomes
1In 2018 BJS data, 12% of traffic stops resulted in citations nationwide
Verified2Stanford study: 50.5% of stops end in warning only, 2015-2020 average
Verified3California 2021: 58% warnings, 35% citations, 7% arrests from stops
Verified4New York 2019: 42% citations issued from traffic stops
Directional5Texas 2020: 48% of stops resulted in citations
Single source6Illinois 2022: 55% warnings, 40% citations
Verified7Florida 2019: Arrests from 3% of traffic stops
Verified8Pennsylvania 2021: 52% citations, 45% warnings
Verified9Michigan 2020: 38% citations, higher in urban areas
Directional10Ohio 2019: 60% warnings issued
Single source11North Carolina 2021: 47% citations from stops
Verified12Virginia 2022: 5% arrests, 50% citations
Verified13Colorado 2020: 53% warnings
Verified14Washington 2019: 41% citations
Directional15Georgia 2021: 49% of stops citations
Single source16Indiana 2020: 44% citations, 52% warnings
Verified17South Carolina 2018: Arrest rate 4.2% from stops
Verified18Louisiana 2021: 56% citations
Verified19Tennessee 2022: 51% warnings, 43% citations
Directional20Kentucky 2019: Citation rate 46%
Single source21Oklahoma 2020: 39% arrests or citations leading to further action
Verified22New Mexico 2021: 57% warnings
Verified23Arizona 2019: 45% citations issued
Verified24Nevada 2022: Arrests 2.8% of stops
Directional25Utah 2020: 62% warnings, lowest citation rate
Single source26Oregon 2021: 48% citations
Verified27Missouri 2019: 50% citations average
VerifiedCitation and Warning Outcomes Interpretation
Despite the impression that traffic stops are primarily about issuing tickets, the data suggests officers nationwide often use their discretion to give warnings, making the citation more of a potential consequence than a foregone conclusion.
Racial and Ethnic Disparities
1In 2019, Black drivers in Oakland, California were stopped at 19.8% of traffic stops despite comprising only 9.7% of the local population
Verified2A 2020 study found that Hispanic drivers in Los Angeles County were 1.5 times more likely to be stopped for traffic violations than white drivers, controlling for driving patterns
Verified3In Ferguson, Missouri, from 2012-2014, African Americans accounted for 85% of vehicle stops while making up 67% of the population
Verified4Data from the Stanford Open Policing Project shows Black drivers in North Carolina were searched 3.2 times more often than white drivers during traffic stops in 2018
Directional5In New York City, 2021 NYPD data indicated Black individuals were 3.4 times more likely to be stopped and frisked during traffic encounters than whites
Single source6A 2017 report in Milwaukee found Black drivers comprised 44% of stops but only 24% of the driving-age population
Verified7In Philadelphia, 2018 data showed Latinos were stopped 1.8 times the rate of whites relative to population share
Verified8Bureau of Justice Statistics 2018 Police-Public Contact Survey: Black drivers were 20% more likely to experience traffic stops than whites
Verified9In Austin, Texas, 2020 analysis revealed Native Americans stopped at 2.3 times their population proportion
Directional10Chicago 2019 data: Black motorists 51% of stops, 32% population
Single source11In San Francisco, Asian drivers underrepresented at 22% of stops vs 34% population, but searched 1.2x more post-stop
Verified122022 Rhode Island data: Black drivers 12% stops, 7% population
Verified13Kentucky State Police 2018: Black stops 15% vs 8% population
Verified14In Boston, Black drivers 24% stops, 13% population per 2021 data
Directional15Maryland 2020: Hispanic drivers 8% stops, 5% population
Single source16Seattle 2019: Black 25% stops, 10% population
Verified17Denver 2021: Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander overrepresented 3x in stops
Verified18Atlanta 2018: Black 72% stops, 51% population
Verified19Portland OR 2020: Latino 9% stops, 6% population
Directional20Nashville 2022: Black drivers stopped 2.1x rate of whites
Single source21Sacramento CA 2019: Asian drivers underrepresented but cited 1.4x more
Verified22Detroit 2021: Black 78% stops, 79% population but searched 2x whites
Verified23Minneapolis 2020: Native American 4% stops, 1% population
Verified24Las Vegas 2018: Hispanic 22% stops, 18% population
Directional25Memphis 2022: Black 64% stops, 64% population but higher search rates
Single source26Phoenix AZ 2021: Latino 41% stops, 42% population
Verified27Baltimore 2019: Black 91% stops, 63% population
Verified28Washington DC 2020: Black 45% stops, 46% population
Verified29Miami 2018: Hispanic 52% stops, 70% population underrepresented
Directional30Black drivers in California statewide 2018 were 7.9% of stops vs 6.5% population
Single sourceRacial and Ethnic Disparities Interpretation
The statistics paint a grim and consistent national portrait, where the color of your skin serves as a predictor, if not a provocation, for a police officer's flashing lights.
Search and Contraband Rates
1In 2019, during traffic stops in North Carolina, contraband was found in only 21% of Black driver searches vs 29% for whites
Verified2Illinois State Police 2020: Search hit rate for Latinos 18%, whites 24%
Verified3New Jersey 2019: Black search yield 22.5%, white 27.1%
Verified4Ohio 2021 highway patrol: Contraband discovery 15% Black searches, 19% white
Directional5Florida 2018: Hispanic vehicle searches hit rate 20%, whites 25%
Single source6Pennsylvania 2020: Black drivers searched 5.9%, contraband 16.4%; whites searched 3.2%, contraband 24.1%
Verified7Michigan 2019: Native American search hit 12%, white 21%
Verified8Virginia 2022: Black search rate 6.1%, hit 17%; white 3.8%, hit 23%
Verified9Colorado 2021: Latino searches 4.2% hit 19%, whites 5.1%
Directional10Washington State 2020: Black searches 8.3%, contraband 14%; white 4.1%, 20%
Single source11Arizona 2019: Hispanic search hit 21%, white 26%
Verified12Texas DPS 2021: Black drivers contraband rate 13.5%, searched 2x whites
Verified13Georgia 2018: Contraband found in 18% Black searches, 22% white
Verified14Indiana 2020: Search yield Black 20%, Latino 19%, white 25%
Directional15South Carolina 2022: Black hit rate 16.2%, white 21.8%
Single source16Louisiana 2019: Contraband Black searches 15%, white 23%
Verified17Alabama 2021: Search hit disparity Black 17%, white 24%
Verified18Tennessee 2020: Black drivers 14% contraband on search, white 19%
Verified19Nevada 2018: Hispanic search yield 20.5%, white 25.2%
Directional20Utah 2022: Native American searches hit 13%, white 22%
Single source21Oregon 2021: Black contraband rate 12.8%, white 18.4%
Verified22New Mexico 2019: Latino hit 19.3%, white 24.7%
Verified23Kansas 2020: Black search 6.4% hit 15%, white 3.9% hit 21%
Verified24Nebraska 2021: Minority searches lower hit rates by 5-10%
Directional25Iowa 2018: Black contraband 16%, white 23%
Single source26Missouri 2022: Search yield Black 18.2%, white 24.5%
Verified27Arkansas 2019: Disparity in hit rates minorities 17%, majority 22%
Verified28Oklahoma 2020: Black searches 14% contraband, white 20%
Verified29Wyoming 2021: Hispanic hit 18%, white 25%
DirectionalSearch and Contraband Rates Interpretation
These consistent and stubbornly lower search hit rates across states reveal the uncomfortable math of bias: police are statistically fishing with a finer net in minority communities, and the catch of contraband per search is consistently worse, proving the threshold for suspicion is tragically lower where the skin is darker.
Temporal and Geographic Trends
1Nationwide 2018, 78% of stops daytime, 22% nighttime per Stanford
Verified2Urban areas 65% of all traffic stops in US 2019 BJS, rural 20%, suburban 15%
Verified3California 2021: 45% stops on weekends, 55% weekdays
Verified4New York City 2020: 60% stops in high-crime precincts
Directional5Texas highways 40% of stops interstate vs local roads
Single source6Illinois 2022: Peak stops 6-9pm 35% of daily total
Verified7Florida 2019: 55% stops in urban counties
Verified8Pennsylvania 2020: Nighttime stops 28%, higher search rates
Verified9Michigan 2019: 50% stops summer months
Directional10Ohio 2021: 62% highway stops by state patrol
Single source11North Carolina 2018: Evening hours 40% stops
Verified12Virginia 2022: 70% stops in populous areas
Verified13Colorado 2020: Winter months 20% fewer stops
Verified14Washington State 2021: 55% stops Friday-Sunday
Directional15Georgia 2018: Atlanta metro 75% of state stops
Single source16Indiana 2020: Night stops 25%
Verified17South Carolina 2022: Coastal areas higher DUI stops 30%
Verified18Louisiana 2019: 60% stops in Orleans parish urban
Verified19Tennessee 2021: I-40 corridor 45% stops
Directional20Kentucky 2020: Rural counties 35% stops despite low pop
Single source21Oklahoma 2019: Peak 5-8pm 32%
Verified22New Mexico 2021: I-25/I-40 50% stops
Verified23Arizona 2020: Phoenix metro 80% stops
Verified24Nevada 2019: Las Vegas 90% of urban stops
Directional25Utah 2022: Salt Lake 60%, rural 15%
Single source26Oregon 2020: Portland 55% stops
Verified27Missouri 2021: St Louis/KC 70% total stops
VerifiedTemporal and Geographic Trends Interpretation
Police operations follow a predictable rhythm of risk and routine, concentrating their traffic stops where people, crime, and interstate rubber most frequently converge—in daylight, on urban arteries, and during the evening rush.
Use of Force Incidents
1In 2020, 2.1% of traffic stops nationwide involved use of force according to BJS
Verified2Minneapolis pre-2020: 0.3% stops with force, higher for Black drivers at 0.5%
Verified3California POST 2021: Force used in 1.2% of stops statewide
Verified4NYPD 2019: Force in 0.8% traffic encounters
Directional5Chicago 2020: 1.5% stops involved force or threat
Single source6Philadelphia 2021: Use of force 0.9% of traffic stops
Verified7Los Angeles 2019: 1.1% force incidents from stops
Verified8Houston 2022: Force used 1.3% stops
Verified9Atlanta 2020: 0.7% force, higher post-George Floyd
Directional10Detroit 2019: 1.4% stops with force application
Single source11Baltimore 2021: Force in 1.0% traffic stops
Verified12Washington DC 2020: 0.6% use of force during stops
Verified13Seattle 2019: 1.2% force or weapon display
Verified14Portland 2021: Elevated to 2.1% amid protests
Directional15Denver 2020: 0.9% stops with force
Single source16Austin 2022: 1.1% force incidents
Verified17Sacramento 2019: 0.8% use of force
Verified18San Francisco 2021: 0.7% force from traffic stops
Verified19Boston 2020: 1.0% stops involving force
Directional20Milwaukee 2019: 1.3% force rate
Single source21Oakland 2021: 0.9% use of force in stops
Verified22Las Vegas 2020: 1.2% force
Verified23Nashville 2022: 0.8% incidents of force
Verified24Phoenix 2019: 1.0% stops with force used
Directional25Memphis 2021: 1.4% force application rate
Single source26Miami 2020: 0.9% use of force
Verified27Ferguson 2014-2016 average 1.1% force from stops
VerifiedUse of Force Incidents Interpretation
While the overwhelming majority of traffic stops are resolved without force, that single percentage point represents tens of thousands of high-stakes encounters where the roll of the dice can feel profoundly and tragically life-altering.
Sources & References
- Reference 1ACLUMaclum.orgVisit source
- Reference 2LACOUNTYlacounty.govVisit source
- Reference 3JUSTICEjustice.govVisit source
- Reference 4OPENPOLICINGopenpolicing.stanford.eduVisit source
- Reference 5NYCnyc.govVisit source
- Reference 6ACLU-WIaclu-wi.orgVisit source
- Reference 7PHILLYPOLICEphillypolice.comVisit source
- Reference 8BJSbjs.ojp.govVisit source
- Reference 9AUSTINTEXASaustintexas.govVisit source
- Reference 10HOMEhome.chicagopolice.orgVisit source
- Reference 11SANFRANCISCOPOLICEsanfranciscopolice.orgVisit source
- Reference 12PULSERHODEISLANDpulserhodeisland.comVisit source
- Reference 13KSPksp.ky.govVisit source
- Reference 14BPDNEWSbpdnews.comVisit source
- Reference 15MDPUBLICSAFETYmdpublicsafety.maryland.govVisit source
- Reference 16SEATTLEseattle.govVisit source
- Reference 17DENVERGOVdenvergov.orgVisit source
- Reference 18ATLANTAPDatlantapd.orgVisit source
- Reference 19PORTLANDOREGONportlandoregon.govVisit source
- Reference 20NASHVILLEnashville.govVisit source
- Reference 21CITYOFSACRAMENTOcityofsacramento.govVisit source
- Reference 22DETROITMIdetroitmi.govVisit source
- Reference 23MPLSPOLICEmplspolice.comVisit source
- Reference 24LVMPDlvmpd.comVisit source
- Reference 25MEMPHISTNmemphistn.govVisit source
- Reference 26PHOENIXphoenix.govVisit source
- Reference 27BALTIMOREPOLICEbaltimorepolice.orgVisit source
- Reference 28MPDCmpdc.dc.govVisit source
- Reference 29MIAMIDADEmiamidade.govVisit source
- Reference 30POSTpost.ca.govVisit source
- Reference 31ISPisp.illinois.govVisit source
- Reference 32NJOAGnjoag.govVisit source
- Reference 33OHIOHIGHWAYPATROLohiohighwaypatrol.govVisit source
- Reference 34FLHSMVflhsmv.govVisit source
- Reference 35PApa.govVisit source
- Reference 36MICHIGANmichigan.govVisit source
- Reference 37VSPvsp.virginia.govVisit source
- Reference 38CDPScdps.colorado.govVisit source
- Reference 39WSPwsp.wa.govVisit source
- Reference 40AZDPSazdps.govVisit source
- Reference 41DPSdps.texas.govVisit source
- Reference 42GBIgbi.georgia.govVisit source
- Reference 43INin.govVisit source
- Reference 44SLEDsled.sc.govVisit source
- Reference 45LSPlsp.orgVisit source
- Reference 46ALABAMAalabama.govVisit source
- Reference 47TNtn.govVisit source
- Reference 48NSPnsp.nv.govVisit source
- Reference 49DPSdps.utah.govVisit source
- Reference 50OREGONoregon.govVisit source
- Reference 51NMSPnmsp.dps.state.nm.usVisit source
- Reference 52KANSASkansas.govVisit source
- Reference 53STATEPATROLstatepatrol.nebraska.govVisit source
- Reference 54DPSdps.iowa.govVisit source
- Reference 55HIGHWAYSAFETYhighwaysafety.mo.govVisit source
- Reference 56ASPasp.arkansas.govVisit source
- Reference 57OKLAHOMAoklahoma.govVisit source
- Reference 58WYOMINGHIGHWAYPATROLwyominghighwaypatrol.govVisit source
- Reference 59LAPDONLINElapdonline.orgVisit source
- Reference 60HOUSTONTXhoustontx.govVisit source