Related reading
Financial Losses
Financial Losses Interpretation
More related reading
Global Prevalence
Global Prevalence Interpretation
More related reading
Phishing Techniques
Phishing Techniques Interpretation
More related reading
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Testing Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Campaign Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Training Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Phishing Test Software of 2026
Trends and Evolution
Trends and Evolution Interpretation
More related reading
Victim Profiles
Victim Profiles Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Christopher Morgan. (2026, February 13). Phishing Scams Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/phishing-scams-statistics
Christopher Morgan. "Phishing Scams Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/phishing-scams-statistics.
Christopher Morgan. 2026. "Phishing Scams Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/phishing-scams-statistics.
Sources & References
- Reference 1IC3ic3.gov
ic3.gov
- Reference 2DOCSdocs.apwg.org
docs.apwg.org
- Reference 3VERIZONverizon.com
verizon.com
- Reference 4PROOFPOINTproofpoint.com
proofpoint.com
- Reference 5IBMibm.com
ibm.com
- Reference 6APWGapwg.org
apwg.org
- Reference 7MICROSOFTmicrosoft.com
microsoft.com
- Reference 8BLOGblog.google
blog.google
- Reference 9KNOWBE4knowbe4.com
knowbe4.com
- Reference 10ENISAenisa.europa.eu
enisa.europa.eu
- Reference 11STATISTAstatista.com
statista.com
- Reference 12ACTIONFRAUDactionfraud.police.uk
actionfraud.police.uk
- Reference 13CYBERcyber.gov.au
cyber.gov.au
- Reference 14CHAINALYSISchainalysis.com
chainalysis.com
- Reference 15AARPaarp.org
aarp.org
- Reference 16FTCftc.gov
ftc.gov
- Reference 17EPSILONepsilon.com
epsilon.com
- Reference 18BARRACUDAbarracuda.com
barracuda.com
- Reference 19CISCOcisco.com
cisco.com
- Reference 20KEEPERSECURITYkeepersecurity
keepersecurity
- Reference 21CYBERSECURITYVENTUREScybersecurityventures.com
cybersecurityventures.com
- Reference 22PONEMONponemon.org
ponemon.org
- Reference 23EUROPOLeuropol.europa.eu
europol.europa.eu
- Reference 24CERT-INcert-in.org.in
cert-in.org.in
- Reference 25RECORDEDFUTURErecordedfuture.com
recordedfuture.com
- Reference 26SBAsba.gov
sba.gov
- Reference 27EGRESSegress.com
egress.com
- Reference 28PTSECURITYptsecurity.com
ptsecurity.com
- Reference 29ICANNicann.org
icann.org
- Reference 30SLASHNEXTslashnext.com
slashnext.com
- Reference 31MANDIANTmandiant.com
mandiant.com







