Related reading
Diversity Initiatives
Diversity Initiatives Interpretation
Graduate Enrollment
Graduate Enrollment Interpretation
Leadership Positions
Leadership Positions Interpretation
Retention Rates
Retention Rates Interpretation
More related reading
Undergraduate Degrees
Undergraduate Degrees Interpretation
Undergraduate Enrollment
Undergraduate Enrollment Interpretation
Workforce Representation
Workforce Representation Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
David Kowalski. (2026, February 13). Minorities In Stem Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/minorities-in-stem-statistics
David Kowalski. "Minorities In Stem Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/minorities-in-stem-statistics.
David Kowalski. 2026. "Minorities In Stem Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/minorities-in-stem-statistics.
Sources & References
- Reference 1NCESnces.ed.gov
nces.ed.gov
- Reference 2NCSESncses.nsf.gov
ncses.nsf.gov
- Reference 3INSIDEHIGHEREDinsidehighered.com
insidehighered.com
- Reference 4AIPaip.org
aip.org
- Reference 5CRAcra.org
cra.org
- Reference 6AAASaaas.org
aaas.org
- Reference 7NSFnsf.gov
nsf.gov
- Reference 8BLSbls.gov
bls.gov
- Reference 9CENSUScensus.gov
census.gov
- Reference 10PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.org
pewresearch.org
- Reference 11NIHnih.gov
nih.gov
- Reference 12GMSPgmsp.org
gmsp.org
- Reference 13SACNASsacnas.org
sacnas.org
- Reference 14DIVERSITYdiversity.nih.gov
diversity.nih.gov
- Reference 15CODEcode.org
code.org
- Reference 16MEYERHOFFmeyerhoff.umd.edu
meyerhoff.umd.edu
- Reference 17BUILDYOURFUTUREbuildyourfuture.withgoogle.com
buildyourfuture.withgoogle.com
- Reference 18NOBELPRIZEnobelprize.org
nobelprize.org
- Reference 19BIOSPACEbiospace.com
biospace.com
- Reference 20ASCEasce.org
asce.org
- Reference 21USPTOuspto.gov
uspto.gov
- Reference 22MACFOUNDmacfound.org
macfound.org
- Reference 23SPGLOBALspglobal.com
spglobal.com
- Reference 24WHITEHOUSEwhitehouse.gov
whitehouse.gov

