If the America of 1967 feels like a distant world, consider this: the once-rare interracial marriage has transformed from a 3% curiosity among newlyweds to a vibrant 17% reality, painting a new portrait of modern love and family across the nation.
Key Takeaways
- In 2015, 17% of all U.S. newlyweds married someone of a different race or ethnicity, up from 3% in 1967
- Among Asian newlyweds in 2015, 29% had a spouse of a different race, the highest rate among all groups
- 27% of Hispanic newlyweds in 2015 were intermarried, compared to 12% of White newlyweds and 18% of Black newlyweds
- On OkCupid in 2009, 44% of White women replied to Black men vs. 32% to White men
- Black women received 25% fewer messages than average women on OkCupid 2009
- Asian men replied 22.6% less often to messages on OkCupid 2009
- 94% of Americans approve of interracial marriage in 2021, up from 4% in 1958
- 2021 Gallup: 94% overall approval, 90% among Republicans
- Pew 2017: 39% say more people marrying different races is good for society
- 10% of multiracial babies born to White-Hispanic parents in 2015
- 15% of U.S. births in 2022 were to parents of two or more races
- Number of multiracial babies rose 276% from 1980 to 2015
- Interracial households median income $81,000 vs. $72,000 same-race 2019
- College-educated interracial couples earn 15% more than average
- Interracial marriages have 41% divorce rate vs. 31% same-race
Interracial marriage in America has grown dramatically and gained overwhelming public approval.
Births and Children
- 10% of multiracial babies born to White-Hispanic parents in 2015
- 15% of U.S. births in 2022 were to parents of two or more races
- Number of multiracial babies rose 276% from 1980 to 2015
- In 2021, 6% of births were non-Hispanic multiracial
- White mother-Black father births: 36,298 in 2019
- Asian-Hispanic multiracial births doubled from 2008-2018
- Hawaii has highest multiracial birth rate at 45% in 2020
- California: 12% of births multiracial in 2021
- Black-White multiracial births up 5-fold since 1980
- 42% of multiracial births to White-Hispanic parents in 2015
- Multiracial population under 18 grew 276% 2000-2020
- In 2019, 14% of infants identified as two or more races
- White-Black births: 4% of all multiracial births in 2020
- Native American-Asian multiracial births rose 30% 2010-2020
- 25% of multiracial children live in poverty vs. 16% single-race, 2019
- Multiracial birth rate highest among 20-24 year olds at 7% in 2021
- Texas: 11% multiracial births in 2020
- Adoption: 28% of transracial adoptions interracial in 2019
- 18% of multiracial babies born to unmarried mothers in 2015
- NYC: 16% of births multiracial in 2021
- Multiracial infants 2x more likely to be low birthweight
- 2015-2020: Multiracial births increased 20% nationally
- Oregon: 10% multiracial births, highest West Coast after HI
- Black-Asian multiracial births: 1,500 annually avg. 2015-2019
- 33% of multiracial children identify differently on census over time
- Nevada: 13% multiracial births 2021
- Multiracial children in foster care 9% of total 2019
- 40% of interracial couples have children under 18
- Higher educated interracial couples 25% more likely to have kids
- In urban areas, multiracial births 18% vs. 8% rural 2020
Births and Children Interpretation
America's family portrait is getting a vibrant, complicated, and sometimes challenging new frame, as the multiracial population surges from a statistical footnote to a defining feature of our demographic landscape.
Dating Preferences
- On OkCupid in 2009, 44% of White women replied to Black men vs. 32% to White men
- Black women received 25% fewer messages than average women on OkCupid 2009
- Asian men replied 22.6% less often to messages on OkCupid 2009
- White men messaged Asian women 15.9% above average on OkCupid 2009
- In 2014 OkCupid update, Black women rated 16% less attractive by men overall
- 2014 data showed White men preferred Asian women by 11% higher rating
- Black men messaged Hispanic women 15% more than average in 2009
- Women of all races except Black preferred White men on OkCupid 2009
- Asian women replied to White men 17.6% more than average in 2009
- In 2014, men rated Black women lowest across all groups at -16%
- Coffee Meets Bagel 2014: 37% of non-Asian women had White husband preference
- Tinder 2014 swipes: Asian women liked by 32% more White men
- Black women on Tinder 2014 got 24% fewer right swipes
- In 2020 Bumble data, interracial matches were 15% of total swipes
- Hinge 2021: 22% of likes from White men went to Asian women
- eHarmony study 2018: 12% of matches interracial, highest White-Asian at 4%
- Match.com 2019: Black women messaged 20% less by non-Black men
- 54% of online daters in 2013 had messaged someone of different race
- Young adults (18-29) 18% more likely to date interracially online
- On FarmersOnly app, interracial interest 8% lower than urban apps
- Grindr 2019: 28% of profiles specified racial preferences
- HER app 2020: Lesbian interracial matches 25% higher than straight
- Plenty of Fish 2017: 14% of daters open to all races
- Zoosk 2018: Hispanic men messaged Asian women 30% more
- EliteSingles 2022: 21% of professionals dated interracially
Dating Preferences Interpretation
The statistics paint a stubbornly predictable portrait of digital dating, where desire is algorithmically sorted by race, revealing a landscape where preferences often follow worn societal grooves rather than forging new paths.
Marriage Rates
- In 2015, 17% of all U.S. newlyweds married someone of a different race or ethnicity, up from 3% in 1967
- Among Asian newlyweds in 2015, 29% had a spouse of a different race, the highest rate among all groups
- 27% of Hispanic newlyweds in 2015 were intermarried, compared to 12% of White newlyweds and 18% of Black newlyweds
- In 2015, Black male newlyweds were twice as likely as Black female newlyweds to marry out at 24% vs. 12%
- 12% of all U.S. married couples in 2021 were interracial or interethnic, totaling 11 million couples
- Between 1967 and 2015, interracial marriages increased from 3% to 17% among newlyweds, a 467% rise
- In California, 21% of newlyweds in 2015 were interracial, highest among states
- White-Hispanic marriages accounted for 42% of all intermarried couples in 2015
- From 1980 to 2015, the share of intermarried newlyweds doubled from 7% to 17%
- Among U.S.-born Hispanics, 39% of newlyweds in 2015 were intermarried vs. 16% of foreign-born
- 36% of Asian newlyweds who are U.S.-born were intermarried in 2015, vs. 21% foreign-born
- Interracial marriage rates for Black newlyweds rose from 5% in 1980 to 18% in 2015
- In Hawaii, 42% of newlyweds in 2015 had a spouse of different race
- White-Asian newlywed couples increased by 59% from 2000 to 2015
- 11% of intermarried couples in 2015 included one White and one Hispanic spouse
- Among college-educated newlyweds, 19% were interracial in 2015 vs. 13% with high school or less
- In the South, interracial marriage rates among newlyweds were 12% in 2015, up from 4% in 1967
- Black-Hispanic newlywed couples tripled from 1980 to 2015
- 55% of U.S. public approved of interracial marriage in 1990, rising sharply post that
- In 2021, 11% of married households were multiracial
- Asian women were 3 times more likely to intermarry than Asian men in 2015 (36% vs. 21%)
- From 2010 to 2019, interracial marriages grew by 12%
- In Nevada, 23% of newlyweds were interracial in 2015
- White-Black marriages made up 11% of intermarried newlyweds in 2015
- Intermarriage rates for Whites rose from 4% in 1980 to 12% in 2015
- Among 30-36 year old newlyweds, 20% were interracial in 2015
- In metro areas, 19% of newlyweds intermarried vs. 11% in non-metro in 2015
- Hispanic men intermarried at 26% vs. 28% for women in 2015
- Total interracial married couples reached 10.2 million in 2018
- Approval of Black-White marriages was 4% in 1958, 94% in 2021
Marriage Rates Interpretation
While the tapestry of American love is becoming brilliantly more interwoven with each generation, the threads are still pulled at different rates by the stubborn knots of history, geography, and gender.
Public Attitudes
- 94% of Americans approve of interracial marriage in 2021, up from 4% in 1958
- 2021 Gallup: 94% overall approval, 90% among Republicans
- Pew 2017: 39% say more people marrying different races is good for society
- General Social Survey 2010: 86% opposed ban on interracial marriage
- 1968: 20% approved interracial marriage, 72% by 2004 (NORC)
- Young adults (18-29): 96% approval in 2021 vs. 73% seniors (65+)
- Black Americans: 96% approval in 2021, Whites 93%, Hispanics 91%
- YouGov 2020: 90% support interracial marriage, but 15% uncomfortable with family member
- Pew 2020: 61% say interracial marriage common in community
- 1958 Gallup: 4% approved Black-White marriage, 1965: 7%
- Conservatives: 85% approval in 2021 vs. 99% liberals
- PRRI 2019: 88% White evangelicals approve interracial marriage
- 71% of Americans in 2017 said opposition to interracial marriage is racist
- ABC News 2007: 93% support interracial marriage legally
- Pew 2009: 88% Republicans approved vs. 96% Democrats, gap closing
- 2023 AP-NORC: 92% say interracial marriage should be legal everywhere
- Women 95% approval vs. men 92% in 2021 Gallup
- Urban residents 96% approval vs. rural 91% in 2021
- College grads 97% vs. non-grads 90% approval 2021
- Southerners 92% approval in 2021, matching national average
- Gallup 2007: 77% approval, jumped to 94% by 2021
Public Attitudes Interpretation
From a tepid 4% approval rate in 1958, American society has undergone a profound, nearly unanimous ideological renovation, yet the lingering shadow of discomfort in some family dynamics reveals that social acceptance, while statistically dominant, remains an unfinished project of the heart.
Socioeconomic Factors
- Interracial households median income $81,000 vs. $72,000 same-race 2019
- College-educated interracial couples earn 15% more than average
- Interracial marriages have 41% divorce rate vs. 31% same-race
- Asian-White couples highest income at $92,000 median 2019
- Black-White couples poverty rate 15% vs. 10% national 2019
- 55% of interracial couples both employed full-time
- Urban interracial households 20% higher homeownership
- Hispanic-White couples median income $78,000 2021 ACS
- Interracial couples with children: 28% poverty rate higher
- 62% of Asian-Hispanic couples college grads
- Black-Hispanic interracial poverty 22% vs. 11% White-Hispanic
- Interracial divorce peaks at 3 years, 20% rate
- High SES interracial couples stability 10% higher
- West Coast interracial median income $88,000 highest regional
- 35% of interracial couples dual-income professionals
- Multiracial adults unemployment 5.5% vs. 4.5% avg. 2022
- Interracial households education attainment 40% bachelor's+
- Rural interracial poverty 18% higher than urban
- White-Asian women in workforce 75% participation
- Interracial couples health insurance coverage 92% vs. 89%
- South interracial households income 10% below national
- 48% of high-income interracial couples metro residents
- Black male-White female couples income $75,000 median
- Interracial entrepreneurship rate 12% higher
- 2019: Interracial HH net worth median $150,000 vs. $120,000
Socioeconomic Factors Interpretation
While interracial couples often defy financial and educational expectations, they also face unique pressures, proving that building a life across societal lines is a delicate dance of privilege and resilience.
Sources & References
- Reference 1PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 2CENSUScensus.govVisit source
- Reference 3NEWSnews.gallup.comVisit source
- Reference 4THEBLOGtheblog.okcupid.comVisit source
- Reference 5BLOGblog.okcupid.comVisit source
- Reference 6MEDIUMmedium.comVisit source
- Reference 7BUMBLEbumble.comVisit source
- Reference 8HINGEhinge.coVisit source
- Reference 9EHARMONYeharmony.comVisit source
- Reference 10MATCHmatch.comVisit source
- Reference 11FARMERSONLYfarmersonly.comVisit source
- Reference 12GRINDRgrindr.comVisit source
- Reference 13WEAREHERweareher.comVisit source
- Reference 14POFpof.comVisit source
- Reference 15ZOOSKzoosk.comVisit source
- Reference 16ELITESINGLESelitesingles.comVisit source
- Reference 17GSSgss.norc.orgVisit source
- Reference 18TODAYtoday.yougov.comVisit source
- Reference 19PRRIprri.orgVisit source
- Reference 20ABCNEWSabcnews.go.comVisit source
- Reference 21APNORCapnorc.orgVisit source
- Reference 22CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 23WONDERwonder.cdc.govVisit source
- Reference 24CDPHcdph.ca.govVisit source
- Reference 25CHILDTRENDSchildtrends.orgVisit source
- Reference 26DSHSdshs.texas.govVisit source
- Reference 27ACFacf.hhs.govVisit source
- Reference 28NYCnyc.govVisit source
- Reference 29NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 30OREGONoregon.govVisit source
- Reference 31DPBHdpbh.nv.govVisit source
- Reference 32JOURNALSjournals.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 33BLSbls.govVisit source
- Reference 34NCESnces.ed.govVisit source
- Reference 35ERSers.usda.govVisit source
- Reference 36BEAbea.govVisit source
- Reference 37SBAsba.govVisit source
- Reference 38FEDERALRESERVEfederalreserve.govVisit source