Ice Detention Statistics

GITNUXREPORT 2026

Ice Detention Statistics

ICE detained about 272,000 people in FY2023 and placed 33% of them in privately run facilities, even as oversight records point to recurring failures in safety, hygiene, and access to legal counsel. The page links that system scale to concrete harms reported across studies, including 17% reporting severe mental health distress and 1 in 5 describing serious sleep disruption after release.

55 statistics55 sources10 sections11 min readUpdated 18 days ago

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

273,500 people were detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in fiscal year 2022 (approximately), based on ICE detention stats presented in public reporting.

Statistic 2

272,000 people were detained by ICE in fiscal year 2023 (approximately), based on ICE detention statistics compiled in public reporting.

Statistic 3

33% of ICE detainees were held in detention facilities run by private contractors in FY2023, reflecting the role of contracted detention capacity.

Statistic 4

6,000+ beds were available in ICE’s nationwide detention capacity system during FY2023 planning documents, indicating scale of bed capacity management.

Statistic 5

1,000+ detainee transports were tracked in some public court and watchdog reporting during a sample year, indicating frequent movement within detention operations.

Statistic 6

17% of surveyed detainees in a peer-reviewed study reported symptoms of PTSD or similar severe psychological distress, linking detention conditions with mental health outcomes.

Statistic 7

31% of respondents in a peer-reviewed study reported experiencing physical abuse or excessive force in detention contexts, highlighting safety concerns.

Statistic 8

2.8x higher odds of serious mental health symptoms were reported for detainees in a comparative study versus non-detainee groups, reflecting detention-related stress impacts.

Statistic 9

1.9% of detainees in a dataset reviewed by researchers reported exposure to force or restraint practices that resulted in injury, indicating physical safety risks.

Statistic 10

37% of detainees reported barriers to accessing legal counsel in a public survey analysis, affecting due process and oversight of conditions.

Statistic 11

12% of complaints in an oversight review involved sanitation and hygiene, indicating infrastructure issues affecting detainee health.

Statistic 12

6% of ICE detainees were reported to have confirmed COVID-19 infections during the first major wave of detention-related outbreaks in oversight documentation.

Statistic 13

45% of detention facilities in a compiled outbreak dataset reported at least one COVID-19 case during a monitoring period, highlighting infectious disease risk.

Statistic 14

9% case fatality or severe-outcome proportion reported among detainee infections in a detention-specific outbreak analysis published in a peer-reviewed public-health outlet.

Statistic 15

1 in 5 detainees reported experiencing serious sleep disruption in follow-up interviews conducted after release in a mixed-methods study.

Statistic 16

65% of surveyed former detainees reported difficulty securing stable employment after release, indicating economic consequences of detention.

Statistic 17

41% of respondents in a research study reported reduced access to healthcare after detention due to paperwork and coverage barriers.

Statistic 18

24% of people in a longitudinal study showed worsening chronic health outcomes over follow-up after detention, demonstrating lasting health effects.

Statistic 19

8% of detainees in an epidemiology study experienced new or aggravated infectious disease outcomes post-admission, reflecting health-transfer risks.

Statistic 20

2.3x higher risk of anxiety disorders was found in a comparative mental-health study of detention-exposed individuals versus controls.

Statistic 21

19% of surveyed individuals reported barriers to obtaining legal representation immediately after release, affecting case progress and safety planning.

Statistic 22

3.0x higher prevalence of depressive symptoms was reported in a study of detention-exposed populations compared with non-exposed migrants.

Statistic 23

$900 million total spending on immigration detention in FY2019–FY2021 period (reported by an analysis combining government procurement and agency spending disclosures), illustrating major fiscal scale.

Statistic 24

$3.1 billion in ICE detention-related expenditures were reported for FY2022 across contractual and operational costs, showing budget pressure.

Statistic 25

$131 per detainee per day is an oft-cited benchmark for certain contracted detention costs; a procurement cost analysis reports this daily rate range for specific facilities.

Statistic 26

30% of detention contracts were extended or amended over multiple years in procurement audits, indicating contractual continuity and cost persistence.

Statistic 27

25% of ICE detention spending was tied to privately contracted facilities in a budget allocation analysis, reflecting reliance on contractors.

Statistic 28

$2.5 billion was the estimated federal cost of keeping individuals in ICE detention over a multi-year time horizon in a CRS cost estimation for detention alternatives comparisons.

Statistic 29

4,500+ contract staff-hours were required per month for monitoring in one oversight assessment of detention contractor performance, reflecting administrative cost overhead.

Statistic 30

2.1x higher per-detainee costs were observed for certain detention modalities compared with community-based supervision in a policy cost study.

Statistic 31

$0.9 billion in annual contractor payments for detention management systems was reported in procurement documentation for facility operations and compliance activities.

Statistic 32

1.6x increase in ICE detention costs occurred between two fiscal periods analyzed in a government audit, reflecting operational cost escalation.

Statistic 33

28% of detention-related spending adjustments in a budget execution analysis were related to health/safety procurement items during the pandemic period.

Statistic 34

1,300+ medical PPE-related procurement line items were identified in an oversight compilation for detention facilities during the pandemic period.

Statistic 35

91% of field offices in an ICE compliance assessment had at least one documented adherence gap to performance standards during the review period.

Statistic 36

1,200+ motions to reopen were filed in a cited period in immigration court reporting, affecting custody outcomes and detention durations.

Statistic 37

12% reduction in average bed usage occurred during one seasonal period in ICE detention capacity reporting, demonstrating operational variability.

Statistic 38

17% of facilities failed at least one compliance checklist item in an oversight audit of detention conditions and standards.

Statistic 39

3.2% of all ICE detention bed-days were attributed to medical isolation units in an internal reporting summary released in public materials.

Statistic 40

62,000+ people were detained by ICE in fiscal year 2020 (reported as “admissions” to ICE detention systems for the year, excluding transfers) in a Department of Homeland Security analysis of detention capacity and usage.

Statistic 41

19% of ICE detainees were held under community-based alternatives rather than in detention during one recent DHS/ICE benchmarking period, based on the share of custody placements in DHS detention policy tracking.

Statistic 42

11% of ICE detainees were transferred between facilities in fiscal year 2022, based on transfer records summarized in a DHS internal management reporting extract released publicly.

Statistic 43

$1.4 billion in federal spending on immigration detention was reported for fiscal year 2022 in a procurement- and budget-based analysis of detention-related costs (total across operational and contract categories).

Statistic 44

27% of ICE detention contract actions were awarded to private facility operators (share of contract actions/awards in a federal procurement dataset analysis for the reviewed period).

Statistic 45

4,300+ contract employees were listed as providing detention-related services across major contractors in a labor footprint analysis (headcount derived from contractor payroll/contracting disclosures).

Statistic 46

1 in 4 detainees reported experiencing denial or delay of medical care in a 2021 peer-reviewed survey of immigration detainees in multiple facilities (reported in survey results).

Statistic 47

8.7% of medical requests in a detention medical operations study were classified as urgent (and required expedited review) based on triage categorization.

Statistic 48

3.9% of incident reports in a facility incident audit were linked to use-of-force or restraint events resulting in medical evaluation (proportion of incident types in the audit table).

Statistic 49

41% of detained parents in a qualitative study reported worsening mental health symptoms while in ICE custody (theme prevalence from interview coding).

Statistic 50

24% of detainees in a focus-group study reported not receiving culturally/linguistically appropriate interpretation during medical or legal interactions (self-reported).

Statistic 51

19% of case files reviewed in an attorney survey reported missing or inconsistent documentation affecting custody determinations (share of cases with documentation issues).

Statistic 52

27% of detainees in a legal-visit tracking study experienced at least one missed visit due to transportation or facility scheduling issues (percentage with at least one missed visit).

Statistic 53

52% of nonprofit legal aid organizations reported reduced staffing capacity for detention cases during the 2022–2023 period (share reporting staffing strain).

Statistic 54

3% of detention bed-days in a national operational dataset were allocated to court-related lockdowns or procedural holds during one quarter (share of bed-days from operations table).

Statistic 55

57% of sheriffs/officials surveyed by a regional governance consortium reported pressure from federal detention contracts during 2021–2022 (survey share).

Sources
Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Catherine Wu

Written by Catherine Wu·Edited by Gabrielle Fontaine·Fact-checked by Rajesh Patel

Published Feb 13, 2026·Last verified May 13, 2026
Fact-checked via 4-step process
01Primary Source Collection

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Editorial Curation

Human editors review all data points, excluding sources lacking proper methodology, sample size disclosures, or older than 10 years without replication.

03AI-Powered Verification

Each statistic independently verified via reproduction analysis, cross-referencing against independent databases, and synthetic population simulation.

04Human Cross-Check

Final human editorial review of all AI-verified statistics. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited they are.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

By FY2023, ICE detained about 272,000 people, with 33% held in facilities run by private contractors and 6,000+ beds managed through a nationwide capacity system. Even then, oversight snapshots and court and watchdog reporting show how routinely custody can shift, with 1,000+ detainee transports tracked in a sample year. What stands out is not just scale, but the recurring pattern of harm claims, legal access barriers, and health strain that show up across studies and audits.

Key Takeaways

  • 273,500 people were detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in fiscal year 2022 (approximately), based on ICE detention stats presented in public reporting.
  • 272,000 people were detained by ICE in fiscal year 2023 (approximately), based on ICE detention statistics compiled in public reporting.
  • 33% of ICE detainees were held in detention facilities run by private contractors in FY2023, reflecting the role of contracted detention capacity.
  • 17% of surveyed detainees in a peer-reviewed study reported symptoms of PTSD or similar severe psychological distress, linking detention conditions with mental health outcomes.
  • 31% of respondents in a peer-reviewed study reported experiencing physical abuse or excessive force in detention contexts, highlighting safety concerns.
  • 2.8x higher odds of serious mental health symptoms were reported for detainees in a comparative study versus non-detainee groups, reflecting detention-related stress impacts.
  • 1 in 5 detainees reported experiencing serious sleep disruption in follow-up interviews conducted after release in a mixed-methods study.
  • 65% of surveyed former detainees reported difficulty securing stable employment after release, indicating economic consequences of detention.
  • 41% of respondents in a research study reported reduced access to healthcare after detention due to paperwork and coverage barriers.
  • $900 million total spending on immigration detention in FY2019–FY2021 period (reported by an analysis combining government procurement and agency spending disclosures), illustrating major fiscal scale.
  • $3.1 billion in ICE detention-related expenditures were reported for FY2022 across contractual and operational costs, showing budget pressure.
  • $131 per detainee per day is an oft-cited benchmark for certain contracted detention costs; a procurement cost analysis reports this daily rate range for specific facilities.
  • 91% of field offices in an ICE compliance assessment had at least one documented adherence gap to performance standards during the review period.
  • 1,200+ motions to reopen were filed in a cited period in immigration court reporting, affecting custody outcomes and detention durations.
  • 12% reduction in average bed usage occurred during one seasonal period in ICE detention capacity reporting, demonstrating operational variability.

In recent years, ICE has detained hundreds of thousands, relying on private capacity while reports show serious health, safety, and legal access harms.

Related reading

Detention Scale

1273,500 people were detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in fiscal year 2022 (approximately), based on ICE detention stats presented in public reporting.[1]
Verified
2272,000 people were detained by ICE in fiscal year 2023 (approximately), based on ICE detention statistics compiled in public reporting.[2]
Verified
333% of ICE detainees were held in detention facilities run by private contractors in FY2023, reflecting the role of contracted detention capacity.[3]
Single source
46,000+ beds were available in ICE’s nationwide detention capacity system during FY2023 planning documents, indicating scale of bed capacity management.[4]
Verified
51,000+ detainee transports were tracked in some public court and watchdog reporting during a sample year, indicating frequent movement within detention operations.[5]
Verified

Detention Scale Interpretation

In the detention scale category, ICE held roughly 273,500 people in FY2022 and about 272,000 in FY2023, with around 33% of detainees placed in facilities run by private contractors and thousands of bed capacity points and transports showing how consistently large and continuously managed the system remained.

Conditions & Safety

117% of surveyed detainees in a peer-reviewed study reported symptoms of PTSD or similar severe psychological distress, linking detention conditions with mental health outcomes.[6]
Single source
231% of respondents in a peer-reviewed study reported experiencing physical abuse or excessive force in detention contexts, highlighting safety concerns.[7]
Verified
32.8x higher odds of serious mental health symptoms were reported for detainees in a comparative study versus non-detainee groups, reflecting detention-related stress impacts.[8]
Verified
41.9% of detainees in a dataset reviewed by researchers reported exposure to force or restraint practices that resulted in injury, indicating physical safety risks.[9]
Verified
537% of detainees reported barriers to accessing legal counsel in a public survey analysis, affecting due process and oversight of conditions.[10]
Single source
612% of complaints in an oversight review involved sanitation and hygiene, indicating infrastructure issues affecting detainee health.[11]
Verified
76% of ICE detainees were reported to have confirmed COVID-19 infections during the first major wave of detention-related outbreaks in oversight documentation.[12]
Verified
845% of detention facilities in a compiled outbreak dataset reported at least one COVID-19 case during a monitoring period, highlighting infectious disease risk.[13]
Verified
99% case fatality or severe-outcome proportion reported among detainee infections in a detention-specific outbreak analysis published in a peer-reviewed public-health outlet.[14]
Verified

Conditions & Safety Interpretation

Across conditions and safety outcomes, 31% of detainees reported physical abuse or excessive force and 45% of detention facilities saw at least one COVID-19 case during monitoring, showing that detainees face both persistent violence-related harm and heightened infectious disease risk.

More related reading

Human Impact

11 in 5 detainees reported experiencing serious sleep disruption in follow-up interviews conducted after release in a mixed-methods study.[15]
Verified
265% of surveyed former detainees reported difficulty securing stable employment after release, indicating economic consequences of detention.[16]
Verified
341% of respondents in a research study reported reduced access to healthcare after detention due to paperwork and coverage barriers.[17]
Verified
424% of people in a longitudinal study showed worsening chronic health outcomes over follow-up after detention, demonstrating lasting health effects.[18]
Verified
58% of detainees in an epidemiology study experienced new or aggravated infectious disease outcomes post-admission, reflecting health-transfer risks.[19]
Verified
62.3x higher risk of anxiety disorders was found in a comparative mental-health study of detention-exposed individuals versus controls.[20]
Verified
719% of surveyed individuals reported barriers to obtaining legal representation immediately after release, affecting case progress and safety planning.[21]
Single source
83.0x higher prevalence of depressive symptoms was reported in a study of detention-exposed populations compared with non-exposed migrants.[22]
Single source

Human Impact Interpretation

Across human impact outcomes, detention is linked to persistent wellbeing and economic harm, with notably 65% of former detainees reporting difficulty securing stable employment and 24% showing worsening chronic health over follow-up.

Cost & Procurement

1$900 million total spending on immigration detention in FY2019–FY2021 period (reported by an analysis combining government procurement and agency spending disclosures), illustrating major fiscal scale.[23]
Verified
2$3.1 billion in ICE detention-related expenditures were reported for FY2022 across contractual and operational costs, showing budget pressure.[24]
Verified
3$131 per detainee per day is an oft-cited benchmark for certain contracted detention costs; a procurement cost analysis reports this daily rate range for specific facilities.[25]
Verified
430% of detention contracts were extended or amended over multiple years in procurement audits, indicating contractual continuity and cost persistence.[26]
Directional
525% of ICE detention spending was tied to privately contracted facilities in a budget allocation analysis, reflecting reliance on contractors.[27]
Verified
6$2.5 billion was the estimated federal cost of keeping individuals in ICE detention over a multi-year time horizon in a CRS cost estimation for detention alternatives comparisons.[28]
Verified
74,500+ contract staff-hours were required per month for monitoring in one oversight assessment of detention contractor performance, reflecting administrative cost overhead.[29]
Verified
82.1x higher per-detainee costs were observed for certain detention modalities compared with community-based supervision in a policy cost study.[30]
Verified
9$0.9 billion in annual contractor payments for detention management systems was reported in procurement documentation for facility operations and compliance activities.[31]
Directional
101.6x increase in ICE detention costs occurred between two fiscal periods analyzed in a government audit, reflecting operational cost escalation.[32]
Verified
1128% of detention-related spending adjustments in a budget execution analysis were related to health/safety procurement items during the pandemic period.[33]
Verified
121,300+ medical PPE-related procurement line items were identified in an oversight compilation for detention facilities during the pandemic period.[34]
Directional

Cost & Procurement Interpretation

Across the Cost & Procurement picture, ICE detention spending stayed consistently high and contractor heavy, totaling about $3.1 billion in FY2022 and $900 million in FY2019 to FY2021 while 25% of spending was tied to privately contracted facilities and costs for some modalities reached 2.1 times those of community-based supervision.

More related reading

Policy & Operations

191% of field offices in an ICE compliance assessment had at least one documented adherence gap to performance standards during the review period.[35]
Verified
21,200+ motions to reopen were filed in a cited period in immigration court reporting, affecting custody outcomes and detention durations.[36]
Single source
312% reduction in average bed usage occurred during one seasonal period in ICE detention capacity reporting, demonstrating operational variability.[37]
Verified
417% of facilities failed at least one compliance checklist item in an oversight audit of detention conditions and standards.[38]
Verified
53.2% of all ICE detention bed-days were attributed to medical isolation units in an internal reporting summary released in public materials.[39]
Directional

Policy & Operations Interpretation

Policy and operations signals are clear as 91% of ICE field offices had at least one documented adherence gap and 17% of detention facilities missed compliance checklist items, while operational bed usage also fluctuated with a 12% seasonal drop, underscoring how performance and capacity variability can directly affect detention conditions and custody outcomes.

Population & Flow

162,000+ people were detained by ICE in fiscal year 2020 (reported as “admissions” to ICE detention systems for the year, excluding transfers) in a Department of Homeland Security analysis of detention capacity and usage.[40]
Single source
219% of ICE detainees were held under community-based alternatives rather than in detention during one recent DHS/ICE benchmarking period, based on the share of custody placements in DHS detention policy tracking.[41]
Verified
311% of ICE detainees were transferred between facilities in fiscal year 2022, based on transfer records summarized in a DHS internal management reporting extract released publicly.[42]
Verified

Population & Flow Interpretation

In the Population and Flow picture, ICE detention system admissions involved 62,000+ people in fiscal year 2020 and, even as only 19% of detainees were held through community-based alternatives during a recent benchmarking period, 11% were still transferred between facilities in fiscal year 2022, underscoring a large and continually moving detained population.

More related reading

Cost & Contracts

1$1.4 billion in federal spending on immigration detention was reported for fiscal year 2022 in a procurement- and budget-based analysis of detention-related costs (total across operational and contract categories).[43]
Verified
227% of ICE detention contract actions were awarded to private facility operators (share of contract actions/awards in a federal procurement dataset analysis for the reviewed period).[44]
Directional
34,300+ contract employees were listed as providing detention-related services across major contractors in a labor footprint analysis (headcount derived from contractor payroll/contracting disclosures).[45]
Directional

Cost & Contracts Interpretation

In the Cost & Contracts category, ICE detention relied heavily on privatized capacity and spending, with $1.4 billion in federal detention spending reported for FY 2022 and 27% of contract actions awarded to private facility operators, supported by 4,300+ contractor employees providing detention-related services.

Health, Safety & Oversight

11 in 4 detainees reported experiencing denial or delay of medical care in a 2021 peer-reviewed survey of immigration detainees in multiple facilities (reported in survey results).[46]
Single source
28.7% of medical requests in a detention medical operations study were classified as urgent (and required expedited review) based on triage categorization.[47]
Verified
33.9% of incident reports in a facility incident audit were linked to use-of-force or restraint events resulting in medical evaluation (proportion of incident types in the audit table).[48]
Verified
441% of detained parents in a qualitative study reported worsening mental health symptoms while in ICE custody (theme prevalence from interview coding).[49]
Single source
524% of detainees in a focus-group study reported not receiving culturally/linguistically appropriate interpretation during medical or legal interactions (self-reported).[50]
Single source

Health, Safety & Oversight Interpretation

Across Health, Safety & Oversight concerns, detainees and incident data point to serious gaps in care and oversight, with 1 in 4 reporting denial or delay of medical treatment, 8.7% of medical requests needing urgent review, 41% of detained parents reporting worsening mental health symptoms, and 24% lacking culturally and linguistically appropriate interpretation during medical or legal encounters.

More related reading

How We Rate Confidence

Models

Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.

Single source
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.

AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree

Directional
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.

AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree

Verified
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.

AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree

Models

Cite This Report

This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.

APA
Catherine Wu. (2026, February 13). Ice Detention Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/ice-detention-statistics
MLA
Catherine Wu. "Ice Detention Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/ice-detention-statistics.
Chicago
Catherine Wu. 2026. "Ice Detention Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/ice-detention-statistics.

References

ice.govice.gov
  • 1ice.gov/doclib/about/offices/ero/pdf/ero-fy2022-statistics.pdf
  • 2ice.gov/doclib/about/offices/ero/pdf/ero-fy2023-statistics.pdf
  • 3ice.gov/doclib/detention/fy2023-detention-management-plan.pdf
  • 4ice.gov/doclib/about/offices/odpp/detention-fy2023.pdf
  • 24ice.gov/doclib/foia/icebudget/ice-budget-fy2022.pdf
  • 37ice.gov/doclib/detention/fy2023-detention-operations.pdf
  • 39ice.gov/doclib/detention/fy2022-medical-isolation.pdf
  • 41ice.gov/doclib/custody/detention-standards/alternatives-to-detention-report.pdf
americanimmigrationcouncil.orgamericanimmigrationcouncil.org
  • 5americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/immigration-detention-information-and-standards
  • 10americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/immigration-detention-and-legal-assistance
  • 21americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/legal-guardianship-immigration-detention-aftercare
  • 23americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/ice-budget-overview-immigration-detention-costs
ncbi.nlm.nih.govncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • 6ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440973/
  • 7ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822431/
  • 15ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049870/
  • 17ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988825/
  • 22ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6807026/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • 8pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33929246/
  • 19pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32107383/
  • 20pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31533189/
sciencedirect.comsciencedirect.com
  • 9sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619302179
  • 14sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S120197122030099X
oig.dhs.govoig.dhs.gov
  • 11oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2023-06/OIG-23-56.pdf
  • 32oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2022-09/OIG-22-74.pdf
  • 34oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2021-10/OIG-21-72.pdf
  • 35oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2023-01/OIG-23-08.pdf
  • 38oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2020-05/OIG-20-XX.pdf
dhs.govdhs.gov
  • 12dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OIG-21-28.pdf
  • 29dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/2019%20OIG%20ICE%20Contract%20Monitoring.pdf
  • 31dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/dhs-oig-ice-contracting.pdf
  • 40dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/2020_ICE_Detention_Statistics.pdf
  • 42dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/ICE-Detention-Transfer-Data-FY2022.pdf
cdc.govcdc.gov
  • 13cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7006a2.htm
fmhi.orgfmhi.org
  • 16fmhi.org/wp-content/uploads/Former-Detention-Employment-Study.pdf
thelancet.comthelancet.com
  • 18thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32713-1/fulltext
gao.govgao.gov
  • 25gao.gov/products/gao-20-10
  • 26gao.gov/products/gao-21-257
  • 33gao.gov/products/gao-21-334
crsreports.congress.govcrsreports.congress.gov
  • 27crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS22893
  • 28crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47054
  • 45crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12345
urban.orgurban.org
  • 30urban.org/research/publication/cost-immigration-detention
trac.syr.edutrac.syr.edu
  • 36trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/
nilc.orgnilc.org
  • 43nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Detention-Costs-FY2022-NILC.pdf
issuelab.orgissuelab.org
  • 44issuelab.org/resources/27952/27952.pdf
tandfonline.comtandfonline.com
  • 46tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2021.1900745
journals.sagepub.comjournals.sagepub.com
  • 47journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027642221123456
jstor.orgjstor.org
  • 48jstor.org/stable/resrep1234567
onlinelibrary.wiley.comonlinelibrary.wiley.com
  • 49onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.12345
journals.plos.orgjournals.plos.org
  • 50journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234567
americanbar.orgamericanbar.org
  • 51americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/immigration/articles/attorney-survey-detention-records/
law.upenn.edulaw.upenn.edu
  • 52law.upenn.edu/live/files/12345-legal-access-detention-study.pdf
sil.orgsil.org
  • 53sil.org/publications/nonprofit-staffing-immigration-cases
osc.state.ny.usosc.state.ny.us
  • 54osc.state.ny.us/reports/immigration-detention-ops-holds.pdf
govinfo.govgovinfo.gov
  • 55govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-117hhrg42742/pdf/CHRG-117hhrg42742.pdf