Key Takeaways
- U.S. homeschoolers’ main access to curricula sources in 2021 included online programs and digital content (NSF survey)
- U.S. federal Department of Education reported that educational services and materials qualify for a range of tax-advantaged spending options (policy summary, 2023)
- 31 states required homeschool registration, documentation, or notice to local education authorities in 2024 (state policy analysis)
- 1.8 million children were homeschooled in the U.S. in 2007 (about 2.5% of K-12 enrollment)
- 11.1% of households with school-age children reported homeschooling during the 2019-20 school year (U.S.)
- 54% of homeschool parents in the U.S. reported being motivated by 'concerns about learning or instruction quality' (U.S. survey)
- Teachers in public schools had 30 hours per week less access to instructional content during COVID-19 closures compared with homeschoolers (comparative analysis, 2020)
- 22% of homeschool parents reported using video instruction as a primary resource (U.S. survey, 2020)
- 18% of homeschool parents reported using online tutoring services (U.S. survey)
- 29% of homeschool parents reported using online assessments (U.S. survey, 2021)
- Homeschooled students in the U.S. scored at or above national norms on achievement tests in multiple studies; average standardized mean around the 'average-to-above-average' range (meta-analysis)
- A 2012 meta-analysis found homeschooled students performed above average compared with traditional school peers on standardized tests (meta-analysis)
- In a large-scale study, homeschooled students had higher math and reading test performance than public-school counterparts after controlling for demographics (study)
In the US, homeschoolers increasingly rely on digital curricula and often match or exceed outcomes on standardized tests.
Related reading
Cost & Access
Cost & Access Interpretation
More related reading
Population Estimates
Population Estimates Interpretation
More related reading
Reasons & Demographics
Reasons & Demographics Interpretation
More related reading
Instruction & Curriculum
Instruction & Curriculum Interpretation
More related reading
Outcomes & Achievement
Outcomes & Achievement Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
David Kowalski. (2026, February 13). Home Schooling Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/home-schooling-statistics
David Kowalski. "Home Schooling Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/home-schooling-statistics.
David Kowalski. 2026. "Home Schooling Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/home-schooling-statistics.
References
- 1nsf.gov/statistics/2023/nsf23307/report/sections/k-12-student-enrollment/home-schooling/
- 2irs.gov/taxtopics/tc101
- 3hslda.org/laws
- 4ncsl.org/education/homeschooling-and-activities
- 5urban.org/research/publication/covid-19-remote-learning-barriers-and-implications
- 6nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=66
- 10nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2016023
- 23nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/
- 24nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/
- 7fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/k-12-digital-learning-market-103003
- 8files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503671.pdf
- 9jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784537
- 11eric.ed.gov/?id=ED609094
- 12eric.ed.gov/?id=ED612865
- 14eric.ed.gov/?id=ED616877
- 21eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133072
- 27eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557352
- 13pcmag.com/reviews/online-tutoring
- 15journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013164420939879
- 16journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543074002274
- 19journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2156759X14557974
- 25journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654316643619
- 17sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088303551930041X
- 18jstor.org/stable/10.2307/41201055
- 20psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-42765-001
- 26psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-63984-001
- 22rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1234.html







