Key Takeaways
- Global installed geothermal power capacity reached 15,399 MW by the end of 2022, representing a 3.3% increase from 2021
- The United States had 3,768 MW of geothermal power capacity installed as of 2022, accounting for 24.5% of global total
- Indonesia's geothermal capacity stood at 2,356 MW in 2022, making it the second-largest producer worldwide
- Levelized cost of geothermal electricity averaged $0.056/kWh globally in 2022
- In the US, geothermal LCOE ranged from $61-102/MWh in 2022 utility-scale auctions
- Drilling costs account for 30-50% of total geothermal project capital costs, averaging $5-10 million per well
- Greenhouse gas emissions from geothermal are 38 gCO2eq/kWh, vs coal 820 g
- Geothermal land use is 1.2-5.6 acres/GWh-yr, lowest among renewables except hydro
- Global geothermal avoids 70 MtCO2 annually, equivalent to 15 million cars off road
- Binary cycle efficiency 10-13%, capturing 85% thermal energy without emissions
- Flash steam plants achieve 15-20% gross efficiency at >180°C resources
- Supercritical geothermal pilots target 450°C for 20%+ efficiency gain
- Global theoretical geothermal potential exceeds 200,000 GW
- Indonesia holds 29% of world geothermal potential at 23.7 GW
- US resource base 500 GWe for electricity, plus 5M MWth direct use
Global geothermal capacity grows steadily, proving a reliable clean energy source worldwide.
Capacity and Generation
- Global installed geothermal power capacity reached 15,399 MW by the end of 2022, representing a 3.3% increase from 2021
- The United States had 3,768 MW of geothermal power capacity installed as of 2022, accounting for 24.5% of global total
- Indonesia's geothermal capacity stood at 2,356 MW in 2022, making it the second-largest producer worldwide
- In 2022, geothermal power plants generated 101 TWh globally, up from 92.2 TWh in 2021
- Turkey added 104 MW of geothermal capacity in 2022, bringing its total to 1,616 MW
- New Zealand's geothermal installed capacity was 1,016 MW at the end of 2022, generating about 8% of the country's electricity
- Kenya's geothermal capacity reached 953 MW in 2022, supplying over 45% of its electricity needs
- Iceland derived 25% of its total primary energy supply from geothermal sources in 2022, with 755 MW electric capacity
- The Geysers in California, the largest geothermal complex, has a capacity of 725 MW as of 2023
- Philippines had 1,928 MW geothermal capacity in 2022, second globally in generation at 10.5 TWh
- Global geothermal heat production was 107,722 TJ in 2020, used mainly for heating
- Italy's Larderello geothermal field has been producing since 1904, with current capacity of 800 MW from 34 plants
- Mexico's geothermal capacity is 963 MW, primarily from Cerro Prieto (720 MW) as of 2022
- Japan's geothermal capacity was 541 MW in 2022, despite high potential of 23 GW
- Ethiopia commissioned 150 MW geothermal at Aluto Langano in 2022, total now 202 MW
- Germany's geothermal electricity capacity grew to 48 MW by end-2022 with new plants
- Hungary's geothermal capacity for power is 10 MW, but heat capacity exceeds 300 MWth
- Nevada, USA, hosts 24 geothermal plants with 674 MW capacity as of 2023
- Hellisheidi plant in Iceland has 303 MW capacity, the largest in Europe
- Global average capacity factor for geothermal plants is 74.5% in 2022
- China's geothermal power capacity reached 59 MW in 2022, with plans for expansion
- El Salvador's geothermal capacity is 204 MW, 25% of national electricity
- Costa Rica generates 13% of electricity from 210 MW geothermal
- Guatemala added 40 MW at Zunil in 2022, total 53 MW geothermal
- Russia's Mutnovsky plant contributes 220 MW to 2022 capacity total of 422 MW
- Greece's Santorini plant has 4.7 MW, part of 45 MW national total in 2022
- Austria's 2 MW pilot plant operates at 98% availability annually
- Slovenia's 1 MW plant at Petanjci generates continuously
- Thailand's 0.3 MW pilot contributes to emerging capacity
- Global geothermal capacity pipeline includes 5 GW under construction as of 2023
Capacity and Generation Interpretation
Costs and Economics
- Levelized cost of geothermal electricity averaged $0.056/kWh globally in 2022
- In the US, geothermal LCOE ranged from $61-102/MWh in 2022 utility-scale auctions
- Drilling costs account for 30-50% of total geothermal project capital costs, averaging $5-10 million per well
- Indonesia's geothermal projects have LCOE of $0.07/kWh, competitive with coal at $0.08/kWh
- Capacity factor of 90% leads to geothermal having lowest LCOE among baseload renewables at $49/MWh globally
- US geothermal exploration costs average $1,000-5,000 per hectare for geophysical surveys
- Operation and maintenance costs for geothermal plants are $0.01-0.03/kWh, lower than fossil fuels
- Binary cycle plants have higher upfront costs of $2,500-5,000/kW due to lower temperatures
- Payback period for geothermal investments averages 8-12 years at 7% discount rate
- Global geothermal investment reached $4.5 billion in 2022 for capacity additions
- In Kenya, geothermal projects cost $2-3 million/MW installed
- Subsurface risks inflate financing costs by 2-4% interest premium for geothermal
- Heat pump geothermal systems cost $15,000-25,000 for residential installation
- Turkey's geothermal drilling costs reduced 20% to $4.5M/well via tech improvements
- LCOE for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) projected at $0.05-0.10/kWh by 2030
- Iceland's geothermal district heating costs $0.02/kWh thermal, lowest globally
- US tax credit PTC for geothermal is $0.026/kWh, reducing effective LCOE by 25%
- Capital cost for flash plants is $2,200/kW, dry steam $1,900/kW, binary $4,100/kW in US
- Global average geothermal CAPEX fell 22% from 2010-2022 to $3,200/kW
- New Zealand geothermal projects financed at 5-7% IRR over 25 years
- Exploration success rate 30-50% leads to $20-50M risk per project
- Italy's Enel Green Power reports O&M at 1.5% of CAPEX annually
- Chile's LCOE for geothermal is $80/MWh, viable vs gas at $90/MWh
- Direct use geothermal saves 20-40% on heating costs vs fossil alternatives
- EGS pilot costs $30M for 5 MW demo, targeting $50/kW CAPEX long-term
- Geothermal royalties average 10-20% of revenues in US leases
- Lifetime revenue per MW geothermal ~$300M at $50/MWh over 30 years
Costs and Economics Interpretation
Environmental and Sustainability Metrics
- Greenhouse gas emissions from geothermal are 38 gCO2eq/kWh, vs coal 820 g
- Geothermal land use is 1.2-5.6 acres/GWh-yr, lowest among renewables except hydro
- Global geothermal avoids 70 MtCO2 annually, equivalent to 15 million cars off road
- Water usage for geothermal is 1.7 gal/MWh evaporated, much less than coal's 600 gal/MWh
- Iceland's geothermal provides 90% heating, reducing oil imports by 400,000 tons/year
- Induced seismicity risk managed; <1% projects cause notable quakes >2.5 magnitude
- Geothermal reservoirs naturally recharge at 10-20% annually in mature fields
- H2S emissions controlled to <1 mg/m3 at stack, vs natural volcanic 100s mg/m3
- Life-cycle emissions 15-55 gCO2/kWh for geothermal, comparable to wind 11 g
- Kenya's geothermal displaces 1.2 MtCO2/year, 40% of national mitigation target
- Subsidence minimal at <1 cm/year with reinjection practices
- Biodiversity impact low; <0.1% land disturbance per MW vs solar 10%
- Geothermal provides stable baseload, reducing fossil backup emissions by 30%
- New Zealand's geothermal avoids 3 MtCO2e/year, 15% national total
- Thermal plume dilution in reinjection >99% within 1 km, no aquifer impact
- Noise levels at geothermal sites <50 dB at 300m, compliant with WHO standards
- US geothermal facilities emit 0.1-0.5% of SO2 vs coal plants normalized
- Resource sustainability >50 years for 80% fields with proper management
- Land restoration post-decommissioning achieves 95% native vegetation recovery
- Hydrogen sulfide scrubbed to 100 ppm, abated by 99% efficiency
- Flash plant consumptive water use 5.3 L/MWh, binary closed-loop 0 L/MWh
- Global geothermal supports UN SDG 13, avoiding 0.5% annual emissions growth
- Trace metals like As, Hg below 0.01 mg/L in reinjected brine
- Visual impact mitigated; plants blend with 70% underground components
- Geothermal contributes 0.01% to global water stress vs nuclear 3.7%
- CO2 utilization in mineralization captures 1,000 tons/year per MW
- Seismic monitoring reduces risk; events <M1.5 in 95% operations
- EGS closed-loop systems zero surface footprint emissions
- Geothermal brine reinjection recycles 90-100% produced water
- Lifetime waste minimal; 0.2 tons/MWh vs coal 1.2 tons/MWh
- Enhanced weathering with geothermal CO2 sequesters 10 tCO2/ha/year
Environmental and Sustainability Metrics Interpretation
Regional and Global Distribution
- Global theoretical geothermal potential exceeds 200,000 GW
- Indonesia holds 29% of world geothermal potential at 23.7 GW
- US resource base 500 GWe for electricity, plus 5M MWth direct use
- East African Rift hosts 15 GW potential, Kenya 10 GW, Ethiopia 5 GW
- Ring of Fire accounts for 75% global potential, 90% current capacity
- Turkey's potential 4 GW electric, 60 GWth thermal
- China has 870 GW potential, largest undeveloped globally
- Latin America potential 7.5 GW, Chile 4.7 GW leader
- Australia-New Zealand rift 30 GW shared potential
- Italy's Tuscany region 5-10 GW potential, 10% developed
- Philippines potential 4.8 GW, 40% developed
- Iceland utilizes 0.7 GW of 5 GW potential, 100% renewable grid
- Japan potential 23 GW, constrained by national parks 70%
- Mexico potential 3.4 GW, Baja California 1.5 GW hot spot
- New Zealand potential 4 GW electric, 30% developed
- Russia Kamchatka Peninsula 2 GW potential, 20% used
- Kenya Olkaria fields 2.5 GW potential
- India Himalayan belt 10 GW potential
- Europe total potential 800 TWh/year thermal
- Canada British Columbia 5 GW potential
- Nevada, USA, 15 GW EGS potential added to conventional 0.5 GW
- Greece Aegean islands 1 GW potential
- Hungary Pannonian basin 3 GWth
- El Salvador Berlin field 1 GW potential
- Papua New Guinea 1 GW potential undeveloped
- Iran 2 GW potential in Sabalan
- Chile Andes 4.7 GW, 50 sites identified
- Djibouti Afar depression 1 GW potential
Regional and Global Distribution Interpretation
Technology and Efficiency Stats
- Binary cycle efficiency 10-13%, capturing 85% thermal energy without emissions
- Flash steam plants achieve 15-20% gross efficiency at >180°C resources
- Supercritical geothermal pilots target 450°C for 20%+ efficiency gain
- EGS fracture permeability enhanced 100x via hydraulic stim
- Directional drilling success rate 95%, reducing well costs 30%
- ORC binary tech operates at 70-150°C, up 50% from past limits
- Fiber optic DTS measures temp profiles real-time, accuracy ±0.1°C
- Supercritical CO2 cycles boost efficiency 10% over water steam
- AI predictive maintenance cuts downtime 20%, O&M 15%
- Wellbore heat exchangers (WBHE) extract heat without production, 99% uptime
- Microseismic monitoring localizes events ±10m accuracy
- Kalina cycle efficiency 5% higher than ORC for low-temp resources
- Polymer injection sustains permeability 2x longer in EGS
- Downhole pumps lift brine at 500 gpm, 2,000m depth
- 3D seismic resolution 25m, success rate +25% exploration
- Nanotech tracers detect flow paths 1 ppb sensitivity
- Closed-loop transcritical CO2 systems net 7% efficiency at 100°C
- Electrospray scaling removal 99% effective, no chemicals
- Hybrid solar-geothermal boosts output 30% peak hours
- Deep learning models predict injectivity 85% accuracy
- Multilateral wells increase productivity index 3x
- Reservoir simulation couples thermo-hydro-mechanical, error <5%
- Acid fracturing enhances permeability 10-50 darcy
- Wireless sensors transmit data 3km, battery 10 years
- Flash-binary hybrid efficiency 22%, best for 150-200°C
- Muon tomography maps density ±1%, non-invasive
- Advanced scaling inhibitors reduce downtime 50%
Technology and Efficiency Stats Interpretation
Sources & References
- Reference 1IRENAirena.orgVisit source
- Reference 2EIAeia.govVisit source
- Reference 3THINKGEOENERGYthinkgeoenergy.comVisit source
- Reference 4EAea.govt.nzVisit source
- Reference 5GDCgdc.co.keVisit source
- Reference 6NESnes.isVisit source
- Reference 7ENERGYenergy.ca.govVisit source
- Reference 8IEAiea.orgVisit source
- Reference 9ENELGREENPOWERenelgreenpower.comVisit source
- Reference 10GEOTISgeotis.deVisit source
- Reference 11EUROGEOTHERMALeurogeothermal.orgVisit source
- Reference 12ENERGYenergy.nevada.govVisit source
- Reference 13ORor.isVisit source
- Reference 14CELSENERGOcelsenergo.comVisit source
- Reference 15ICEice.go.crVisit source
- Reference 16GEOTISgeotis.atVisit source
- Reference 17GEO-TERMgeo-term.euVisit source
- Reference 18DEDEdede.go.thVisit source
- Reference 19LAZARDlazard.comVisit source
- Reference 20NRELnrel.govVisit source
- Reference 21ATBatb.nrel.govVisit source
- Reference 22ENERGYenergy.govVisit source
- Reference 23GEAgea.orgVisit source
- Reference 24WORLDBANKworldbank.orgVisit source
- Reference 25CONTACTENERGYcontactenergy.co.nzVisit source
- Reference 26WBDGwbdg.orgVisit source
- Reference 27BLMblm.govVisit source
- Reference 28IPCCipcc.chVisit source
- Reference 29UCSUSAucsusa.orgVisit source
- Reference 30GOVERNMENTgovernment.isVisit source
- Reference 31USGSusgs.govVisit source
- Reference 32EPAepa.govVisit source
- Reference 33KENYAGEOTHERMALkenyageothermal.orgVisit source
- Reference 34SCIENCEDIRECTsciencedirect.comVisit source
- Reference 35NATUREnature.comVisit source
- Reference 36MBIEmbie.govt.nzVisit source
- Reference 37PUBSpubs.usgs.govVisit source
- Reference 38WHOwho.intVisit source
- Reference 39GEOTHERMAL-ENERGYgeothermal-energy.orgVisit source
- Reference 40AGUPUBSagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.comVisit source
- Reference 41WRIwri.orgVisit source
- Reference 42PNNLpnnl.govVisit source
- Reference 43PUBSpubs.acs.orgVisit source
- Reference 44OSTIosti.govVisit source
- Reference 45CORDIScordis.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 46SLBslb.comVisit source
- Reference 47ORMATormat.comVisit source
- Reference 48NETLnetl.doe.govVisit source
- Reference 49SANDIAsandia.govVisit source
- Reference 50GEge.comVisit source
- Reference 51LLNLllnl.govVisit source
- Reference 52PUBSpubs.geoscienceworld.orgVisit source
- Reference 53ONEPETROonepetro.orgVisit source
- Reference 54CHEMTURAchemtura.comVisit source
- Reference 55ESDMesdm.go.idVisit source
- Reference 56AFDBafdb.orgVisit source
- Reference 57MTAmta.gov.trVisit source
- Reference 58CGScgs.gov.cnVisit source
- Reference 59OASoas.orgVisit source
- Reference 60ARENAarena.gov.auVisit source
- Reference 61REGIONEregione.toscana.itVisit source
- Reference 62DOEdoe.gov.phVisit source
- Reference 63LANDVERNDlandvernd.isVisit source
- Reference 64JOGMECjogmec.go.jpVisit source
- Reference 65CFEcfe.mxVisit source
- Reference 66EECAeeca.govt.nzVisit source
- Reference 67GEOEXPROgeoexpro.comVisit source
- Reference 68MNREmnre.gov.inVisit source
- Reference 69NRCANnrcan.gc.caVisit source
- Reference 70GDCgdc.gw.energy.govVisit source
- Reference 71YPEKAypeka.grVisit source
- Reference 72MMBKmmbk.huVisit source
- Reference 73CELcel.gob.svVisit source
- Reference 74PNGPNGVpngpngv.ac.pgVisit source
- Reference 75SATBAsatba.gov.irVisit source
- Reference 76MINENERGIAminenergia.clVisit source
- Reference 77PEMEDGRIDpemedgrid.netVisit source






