Key Takeaways
- Engaged employees show 23% greater profitability than non-engaged employees
- 43% of employees strongly agree that their immediate manager provides meaningful recognition
- Employee engagement is measured across 8 dimensions in the Gallup Q12 framework (enabling survey benchmarking)
- 34% of employees say they are engaged at work
- Workforce participation rate among ages 25-54 was 78.7% in 2023 (context for engagement survey populations)
- 63% of employees report burnout at work
- 39% of employees say they have quit a job for better recognition
- 50% of employees believe that engagement is managed by leadership rather than HR
- U.S. job openings rate was 3.9% in April 2024
- 37% of employees say they would be more committed if they felt their work was recognized
- 56% of employees say they do not feel their company takes action on survey feedback
- 42% of employees trust their organizations to do the right thing a majority of the time
- 71% of employees say they would work harder if they felt more appreciated
- Employee engagement is strongly correlated with customer satisfaction (r=0.6) in a meta-analysis
- Higher engagement teams have 41% lower turnover risk
Only 34% feel engaged, yet recognition drives commitment, with high engagement linked to higher profitability and lower turnover.
Related reading
Survey Findings
Survey Findings Interpretation
Global Benchmarks
Global Benchmarks Interpretation
More related reading
Workplace Wellbeing
Workplace Wellbeing Interpretation
Talent Retention
Talent Retention Interpretation
Employee Voice
Employee Voice Interpretation
More related reading
Trust And Leadership
Trust And Leadership Interpretation
Performance Impact
Performance Impact Interpretation
More related reading
Market Size
Market Size Interpretation
Industry Trends
Industry Trends Interpretation
Employee Experience
Employee Experience Interpretation
More related reading
Priority And Focus
Priority And Focus Interpretation
Retention And Turnover
Retention And Turnover Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Marcus Engström. (2026, February 13). Employee Engagement Survey Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/employee-engagement-survey-statistics
Marcus Engström. "Employee Engagement Survey Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/employee-engagement-survey-statistics.
Marcus Engström. 2026. "Employee Engagement Survey Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/employee-engagement-survey-statistics.
References
- 1gallup.com/workplace/236927/employee-engagement-rises-leadership-communications.aspx
- 2gallup.com/workplace/247391/manager-recognition-meaningful.aspx
- 3gallup.com/workplace/236927/state-global-workplace-2017.aspx
- 4bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t03.htm
- 5bls.gov/cps/cpsaat25.htm
- 6bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm
- 7bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
- 12bls.gov/news.release/jolts.htm
- 8eurofound.europa.eu/data/career-development/job-satisfaction
- 9apa.org/monitor/2023/03/burnout
- 10workhuman.com/resources/recognition-and-engagement-study/
- 11hbr.org/topic/employee-engagement
- 13tinypulse.com/blog/employee-engagement-statistics
- 14pulseway.com/blog/employee-engagement-survey-results
- 15edelman.com/trust/2024/trust-barometer
- 16zippia.com/advice/employee-recognition-statistics/
- 17psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-12012-000
- 18workforce.com/news/employee-engagement-turnover-statistics
- 19safetyculture.com/topics/employee-engagement/
- 20slideshare.net/mobile/worldatwork/recognition-and-engagement
- 21sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597815000231
- 22tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1540899
- 23grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/employee-engagement-software-market
- 24alliedmarketresearch.com/employee-engagement-survey-market-A10084
- 25mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/hr-analytics-market
- 26gartner.com/en/documents/3885317
- 27aon.com/getmedia/5b2c5f0c-7f4c-4a1a-b3a1-0a9d8cf0f9e0/Aon-2021-Global-Workforce-Study.pdf
- 28oecd.org/employment/hybrid-work.htm
- 29workplaceinsider.com/pulse-surveys-statistics/
- 30rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA/RRA1700/RRA1700.pdf
- 31who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
- 32commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/future-of-work-spring-2024-employee-study.pdf
- 33oakinnovation.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/employee-engagement-survey-results-2023.pdf
- 34officeinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/survey-transparency-trust-report.pdf
- 35inc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/recognition-timely-survey.pdf
- 36surveymonkey.com/mp/employee-feedback-engagement-progress-report.pdf







