Key Takeaways
- 1.41% of all U.S. disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were attributable to alcohol use disorders in 2019
- In 2019, 4,455 people died in crashes involving a driver who had tested positive for alcohol
- In a systematic review, ignition interlock reduced DUI recidivism with an average effect size corresponding to about 40%
- Interlock programs reduced the likelihood of a subsequent DUI by 6.5 percentage points compared with controls in a large evaluation (Minnesota)
- 0.08 g/dL was the BAC threshold for per se alcohol-impaired driving in many U.S. states (0.08 BAC per se laws)
- 26% of people in the U.S. (age 16+) reported driving after drinking alcohol at least once in the past year (2018 survey)
- 35.6% of high school students reported that they had ridden at least once with a driver who had been drinking alcohol
- The Global Ignition Interlock Systems market was valued at $1.6 billion in 2023 (industry market research)
- The Global Alcohol Breathalyzer market was valued at $2.8 billion in 2023 (industry market research)
- In 2022, the breath alcohol testing devices and services market in North America accounted for 38% of global share (industry market research)
- NHTSA’s Alcohol Countermeasures Program is a discretionary grant program that supports states with funding amounts up to $10 million per year (program info)
- In a 2020 meta-analysis, randomized and quasi-experimental ignition interlock studies showed reduced recidivism versus controls
- In a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis, ignition interlocks were cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds in multiple settings (peer-reviewed)
- 11.5% of people age 18+ in the U.S. reported driving after drinking in the past year in 2021
- 2.2% of students in grades 9–12 reported riding with a driver who had been drinking alcohol at least once in the past 30 days (2019 YRBS)
In 2022, 1.1 million DUI arrests show the stakes, while ignition interlocks and laws reduce recidivism and fatalities.
Related reading
01 · Category
Burden And Mortality1 stats
Burden And Mortality Interpretation
02 · Category
Trends In Detection6 stats
Trends In Detection Interpretation
03 · Category
Legal And Enforcement7 stats
Legal And Enforcement Interpretation
04 · Category
Market Size3 stats
Market Size Interpretation
05 · Category
Industry Technology2 stats
Industry Technology Interpretation
More related reading
06 · Category
Cost Analysis1 stats
Cost Analysis Interpretation
07 · Category
Behavior And Prevalence3 stats
Behavior And Prevalence Interpretation
08 · Category
Market Dynamics2 stats
Market Dynamics Interpretation
09 · Category
Program Effectiveness2 stats
Program Effectiveness Interpretation
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Marcus Afolabi. (2026, February 13). Driving Under The Influence Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/driving-under-the-influence-statistics
Marcus Afolabi. "Driving Under The Influence Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/driving-under-the-influence-statistics.
Marcus Afolabi. 2026. "Driving Under The Influence Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/driving-under-the-influence-statistics.
Sources & references
27 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level
+9 additional datasets cited (not shown individually)

