GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Digital Products And SoftwareTop 9 Best Museum Collection Management Software of 2026
Discover the top 10 best museum collection management software for efficient operations.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Gallery Systems
Object movement and status tracking tied to item-level documentation and media
Built for collections teams needing museum-specific documentation, movement tracking, and audit-ready records.
TMS (The Museum System)
Loan management built around museum operational status and linked object records
Built for institutions needing structured collection workflows, loans tracking, and audit-ready records.
PastPerfect
Accessioning and object record management built for museum documentation workflows
Built for museums needing dependable collections documentation and reporting for curated object records.
Comparison Table
This comparison table benchmarks museum collection management software such as Gallery Systems, TMS (The Museum System), PastPerfect and Axiell PastPerfect, plus Arches and other widely used platforms. It helps readers compare core functions for cataloging, accession and deaccession workflows, media handling, search and reporting, and migration paths across collection sizes and institutional needs.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallery Systems Museum collections platform for cataloging, authority data, object relationships, and public web presentation of collection content. | collections platform | 8.5/10 | 9.0/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| 2 | TMS (The Museum System) Museum collection management software for cataloging objects, tracking movements, managing users and permissions, and generating reports. | enterprise collections | 8.1/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 3 | PastPerfect Collections management for museums that organizes accessioning, cataloging, object files, and reports for internal use and research. | desktop collections | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 4 | Axiell PastPerfect Axiell collections software for museum cataloging, controlled vocabularies, and collection tracking with configurable workflows. | collections management suite | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 5 | Arches Open-source collection and site documentation system that models cultural heritage data with graph relationships and configurable forms. | open-source heritage data | 8.0/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 6 | CollectiveAccess Open-source collections management system that supports cataloging, authority control, media handling, and export for digital collections. | open-source collections | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 7 | CollectionSpace Open-source collection management platform that manages object records, controlled vocabularies, and integration-ready APIs. | open-source museum platform | 7.5/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 8 | Goobi Digital library and collection workflow management that handles digitization, object lifecycle metadata, and presentation pipelines. | digitization workflows | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 9 | Vernon Systems MIMSY Museum collection management system for cataloging, object relationships, and data export for collections portals and internal tracking. | museum catalog system | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.0/10 |
Museum collections platform for cataloging, authority data, object relationships, and public web presentation of collection content.
Museum collection management software for cataloging objects, tracking movements, managing users and permissions, and generating reports.
Collections management for museums that organizes accessioning, cataloging, object files, and reports for internal use and research.
Axiell collections software for museum cataloging, controlled vocabularies, and collection tracking with configurable workflows.
Open-source collection and site documentation system that models cultural heritage data with graph relationships and configurable forms.
Open-source collections management system that supports cataloging, authority control, media handling, and export for digital collections.
Open-source collection management platform that manages object records, controlled vocabularies, and integration-ready APIs.
Digital library and collection workflow management that handles digitization, object lifecycle metadata, and presentation pipelines.
Museum collection management system for cataloging, object relationships, and data export for collections portals and internal tracking.
Gallery Systems
collections platformMuseum collections platform for cataloging, authority data, object relationships, and public web presentation of collection content.
Object movement and status tracking tied to item-level documentation and media
Gallery Systems is distinct for museum-grade collection workflows built around cataloging, stewardship, and image-rich records rather than generic asset tracking. The system supports structured object documentation, condition and location tracking, and controlled vocabularies to keep records consistent across curators and registrars. Collections staff can manage donor and acquisition histories alongside item-level metadata and media to support daily documentation and long-term preservation records. The product focus stays on museum collections processes such as object status, movements, and reference retrieval that teams use in collections management and reporting.
Pros
- Museum-centric object records with structured metadata and multimedia support
- Strong support for tracking locations, movements, and object status over time
- Designed for consistent cataloging through vocab controls and documentation standards
Cons
- Complex workflows can require training for registrars and curators
- Reporting and customization depth can feel rigid without implementation support
- User interface efficiency depends on how templates and fields are configured
Best For
Collections teams needing museum-specific documentation, movement tracking, and audit-ready records
TMS (The Museum System)
enterprise collectionsMuseum collection management software for cataloging objects, tracking movements, managing users and permissions, and generating reports.
Loan management built around museum operational status and linked object records
TMS stands out with a museum collection management approach that pairs structured cataloging with gallery-ready object records. Core capabilities cover object and collection data management, records for loans and incoming acquisitions, and research and status workflows. It also supports linking related materials like media, documentation, and administrative events to keep provenance and context attached to each item. Auditability and operational tracking are emphasized for teams that manage ongoing collections activity across departments.
Pros
- Strong object cataloging with fields for collections, provenance, and documentation.
- Loan and acquisition tracking supports operational museum workflows.
- Media and documentation can be attached directly to object records.
Cons
- Advanced configuration and workflows can feel heavy for small teams.
- Some tasks may require staff training to avoid inconsistent data entry.
Best For
Institutions needing structured collection workflows, loans tracking, and audit-ready records
PastPerfect
desktop collectionsCollections management for museums that organizes accessioning, cataloging, object files, and reports for internal use and research.
Accessioning and object record management built for museum documentation workflows
PastPerfect stands out with museum-focused collection workflows that blend accession, object records, and cataloging into one system. It supports detailed object fields, images, donor and location tracking, and reporting for inventory and collections management tasks. The software also covers research-style record management so staff can work with consistent metadata across acquisitions and existing holdings. Limitations show up when institutions need complex multi-user configuration, custom workflows beyond the core templates, or deep integration with external collection platforms.
Pros
- Museum-specific cataloging supports accessioning, object records, and location tracking
- Strong support for images, fields, and consistent metadata entry across collections
- Inventory and collection reports help track holdings and manage documentation
Cons
- Customization for complex workflows and field logic can be limited
- Advanced multi-user configuration and permissions require process workarounds
- Integrations outside collection systems are not as comprehensive as specialized tools
Best For
Museums needing dependable collections documentation and reporting for curated object records
Axiell PastPerfect
collections management suiteAxiell collections software for museum cataloging, controlled vocabularies, and collection tracking with configurable workflows.
Accession and object movement tracking with location-based collection control
Axiell PastPerfect stands out with museum-focused collection control built around accession, cataloging, and movement records. It supports object-level descriptions, multi-field searches, and controlled vocabularies for consistent documentation across large backlogs. The system also includes reporting for collections status and audit-ready workflows that track who changed what and when. PastPerfect is strongest for day-to-day collection management where consistent object records matter more than highly customized digital experiences.
Pros
- Strong object cataloging with accession, location, and movement tracking
- Search and reporting support structured workflows for collections documentation
- Built for collection control with audit-friendly operational records
Cons
- Configuring fields and workflows requires staff training and data cleanup
- Digital asset handling and media workflows can feel basic versus DAM-first tools
- Integrations and cross-system automation are limited compared with broader platforms
Best For
Museums needing accessioned collection control and audit-friendly cataloging at steady scale
Arches
open-source heritage dataOpen-source collection and site documentation system that models cultural heritage data with graph relationships and configurable forms.
Configurable CIDOC CRM-aligned data model and relationship mapping in Arches
Arches is distinct for its museum-focused data model that supports configurable entities, controlled vocabularies, and relationships across collections, objects, places, and people. Core capabilities include structured cataloging, advanced relationship management, and configurable workflows that let teams model complex collection facts without rewriting the entire system. The platform also supports standards-aligned data export and integrates with external systems through APIs and exchange-friendly data structures. Arches is best suited to institutions that need consistent, governed collection data and can invest in configuration and rollout planning.
Pros
- Museum-specific data modeling for objects, events, and relationships
- Controlled vocabularies and validation support consistent cataloging
- Configurable workflows for collection-centric business processes
Cons
- Configuration depth can increase implementation time for smaller teams
- User interfaces can feel technical without strong local support
Best For
Museums needing governed, relationship-rich collections data and configurable workflows
CollectiveAccess
open-source collectionsOpen-source collections management system that supports cataloging, authority control, media handling, and export for digital collections.
Authority-controlled names and thesauri with configurable relationships between records
CollectiveAccess stands out for its museum-focused data model that supports complex object, agent, and collection relationships across multiple languages. It provides curator workflows for cataloging, controlled vocabularies, and structured metadata that can map to publication-ready records. Strong search and reporting support help teams manage provenance, movements, and collections at scale, with configuration flexibility for diverse institutional needs.
Pros
- Museum-centric data model for objects, events, agents, and relationships
- Configurable metadata fields with authority controls for consistent cataloging
- Search and reporting tools support provenance and collection management
- Workflow-oriented permissions help separate cataloging and publishing tasks
Cons
- Setup and customization can require technical expertise to fit local workflows
- User interface complexity slows down basic cataloging for smaller teams
- Advanced reporting often needs configuration rather than simple GUI builders
- Integrations can depend on administrator-level maintenance of exports and mappings
Best For
Institutions needing configurable collection management with complex metadata relationships
CollectionSpace
open-source museum platformOpen-source collection management platform that manages object records, controlled vocabularies, and integration-ready APIs.
Entity-driven collections model that links objects, events, agents, and documentation
CollectionSpace stands out for its museum-first design and extensible data model built around collections, objects, and related entities. It supports configurable workflows for cataloging, acquisitions, loans, and conservation actions through structured records and roles. The system integrates authority management and search across objects and metadata, which helps reduce duplication in collections documentation. It is strongest when institutions need standards-aware cataloging and shared governance across departments rather than a simple catalog viewer.
Pros
- Museum-oriented data model supports objects, events, agents, and documentation links
- Role-based workflows support cataloging, approvals, and department-specific responsibilities
- Authority and metadata management helps keep names and terms consistent
Cons
- Setup and configuration require technical ownership and staff training
- User interface can feel complex for day-to-day catalogers
- Reporting and advanced analytics take extra effort to implement
Best For
Museums needing structured cataloging, authority control, and configurable workflows across teams
Goobi
digitization workflowsDigital library and collection workflow management that handles digitization, object lifecycle metadata, and presentation pipelines.
Workflow management for cataloging, digitization, and publication with approval traceability
Goobi stands out for collection-centric workflows that connect digitization, metadata enrichment, and publication across museum processes. Core capabilities include item records, structured cataloging, authority support, and rights-aware handling for digital assets. The system emphasizes multi-step approvals and operational traceability for tasks like ingestion, editing, and outward presentation. It fits teams that need consistent data quality controls alongside catalog and digital object management.
Pros
- Workflow-driven cataloging supports review and controlled metadata changes
- Strong focus on digitization and publication of collection-linked digital objects
- Structured metadata and authority elements support consistent cataloging
Cons
- Setup and configuration require museum-domain knowledge and time investment
- User experience can feel form-heavy for large cataloging tasks
- Advanced tailoring of workflows may add complexity for admin teams
Best For
Museums needing controlled, workflow-based collection cataloging and digital publication
Vernon Systems MIMSY
museum catalog systemMuseum collection management system for cataloging, object relationships, and data export for collections portals and internal tracking.
Authority control and controlled terminology for consistent catalog metadata
MIMSY stands out as museum collection management software built for structured cataloging, authority control, and repeatable workflows across multiple collections. It supports artifact records with rich fields, digitization links, and conservation or condition-related tracking that museums can tailor to established documentation practices. Vernon Systems also emphasizes configuration for user roles and museum-specific processes so curators and collections staff can work within consistent standards. For teams that need controlled data and auditable collection histories, MIMSY provides a robust system of record rather than a lightweight catalog.
Pros
- Strong structured cataloging for detailed object records
- Authority control helps keep names and terms consistent
- Workflow support supports collection management processes
- Digitization links connect records with images and media
Cons
- Configuration and workflows can feel complex to set up
- Usability depends heavily on local implementation
- Advanced reporting often requires careful setup
Best For
Museums needing controlled cataloging and workflow-driven collection records
Conclusion
After evaluating 9 digital products and software, Gallery Systems stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Museum Collection Management Software
This buyer's guide explains how to choose Museum Collection Management Software using practical workflow and data-model requirements found in Gallery Systems, TMS (The Museum System), PastPerfect, Axiell PastPerfect, Arches, CollectiveAccess, CollectionSpace, Goobi, Vernon Systems MIMSY, and other top contenders. The guide covers what the software must do for cataloging, authority control, provenance, movements, and audit trails. It also highlights common configuration and usability pitfalls that directly affect day-to-day collections operations.
What Is Museum Collection Management Software?
Museum Collection Management Software is a system for recording object documentation, managing collections workflows, and maintaining consistent metadata for curatorial and collections operations. It solves problems like accessioning, cataloging, location and movement tracking, authority control, and linking related materials to each object record. For example, PastPerfect combines accessioning, object records, image handling, and inventory reporting in one museum-focused workflow. Gallery Systems emphasizes object movement and status tracking tied to item-level documentation and multimedia records.
Key Features to Look For
The fastest path to a good fit comes from matching collections processes to concrete capabilities that specific tools handle well.
Object movement and status tracking tied to item-level records
Gallery Systems supports object movement and status tracking connected to item-level documentation and media, which helps keep stewardship histories attached to the same object record. Axiell PastPerfect also focuses on accession, location, and movement tracking with audit-friendly operational records.
Loan and acquisition workflows built for museum operations
TMS (The Museum System) provides loan management tied to museum operational status and linked object records. It also supports incoming acquisitions and research-style workflows that keep provenance and context attached to each item.
Accessioning-first object record management
PastPerfect is built around accessioning and object record management with location tracking and image support. Axiell PastPerfect extends this accession and movement control with structured workflows that emphasize collection control and auditability at steady scale.
Authority control for names and controlled terminology
CollectiveAccess provides authority-controlled names and thesauri with configurable relationships between records, which reduces inconsistent terminology across catalogers. Vernon Systems MIMSY emphasizes authority control and controlled terminology for consistent catalog metadata.
Relationship-rich, standards-aware data modeling
Arches uses a configurable CIDOC CRM-aligned data model that supports relationship mapping across objects, events, places, and people. CollectionSpace also links objects, events, agents, and documentation through an entity-driven model designed for governed shared cataloging.
Workflow-driven review and approval traceability for cataloging and publication
Goobi emphasizes multi-step approvals and operational traceability for cataloging, digitization, and outward presentation workflows. CollectionSpace supports role-based workflows for cataloging, approvals, and department-specific responsibilities, which helps separate responsibilities across collections teams.
How to Choose the Right Museum Collection Management Software
A practical selection framework starts by mapping each required workflow to a tool that already models that workflow in its data structure and permissions.
Map your core workflows to tool-specific capabilities
Define whether the primary need is accessioning, ongoing movement tracking, or loans and acquisitions, because tools differ in how they operationalize those workflows. PastPerfect and Axiell PastPerfect fit accessioning and museum documentation workflows, while Gallery Systems is strongest for object movement and status tracking tied to item-level media. TMS (The Museum System) is built around loan management tied to operational status and linked object records.
Decide how much configuration complexity the team can support
Tools like Arches, CollectiveAccess, and CollectionSpace rely on configurable data models and workflows, which requires technical ownership and staff training to fit local practices. Goobi also needs setup and configuration time because it connects cataloging to digitization and publication pipelines with approval traceability. Gallery Systems and PastPerfect are often easier for museum-focused adoption because they are built around structured cataloging and record templates.
Validate authority control and terminology consistency requirements
If consistent names and terms are a hard requirement across departments and multilingual records, CollectiveAccess provides authority-controlled names and thesauri with configurable relationships. Vernon Systems MIMSY and CollectionSpace also support authority and metadata management to keep names and terms consistent during structured cataloging.
Check whether relationships between objects, agents, and events match the institution’s model
If the institution needs relationship-rich modeling across cultural heritage facts, Arches supports configurable CIDOC CRM-aligned structures and relationship mapping. CollectionSpace links objects, events, agents, and documentation through an entity-driven collections model, which supports governed shared cataloging. If the need is more collections workflow with strong authority and permissions, CollectiveAccess emphasizes relationships between records with curator workflows.
Ensure digital asset links and publication workflows align with operations
If digital publication and digitization approvals are central, Goobi ties digitization and outward presentation with controlled metadata changes and approval traceability. Gallery Systems and PastPerfect support image-rich object records, which helps collections teams attach media directly to catalog documentation. Goobi’s focus on rights-aware handling and publication pipelines also matters when digital presentation requires review steps.
Who Needs Museum Collection Management Software?
Museum Collection Management Software fits organizations that manage structured object records, consistent metadata entry, and governed collections workflows across staff roles and time.
Collections teams that need museum-grade movement, location, and stewardship histories
Gallery Systems excels when teams must track object movements and statuses tied to item-level documentation and media for audit-ready records. Axiell PastPerfect also fits because it supports accession, location, and movement tracking with audit-friendly operational records.
Museums running ongoing accessioning, curated object documentation, and inventory reporting
PastPerfect is a strong match for accessioning and object record management that includes donor and location tracking plus reporting for inventory and holdings. Axiell PastPerfect fits the same operational pattern while emphasizing controlled collection control at steady scale with structured workflows.
Institutions managing loans and acquisitions as day-to-day collections operations
TMS (The Museum System) is built for loan management tied to museum operational status with linked object records. It also supports incoming acquisitions and research and status workflows with media and documentation attachments.
Organizations needing governed, relationship-rich metadata and configurable business processes
Arches fits institutions that must model complex cultural heritage facts using a configurable CIDOC CRM-aligned data model with relationship mapping. CollectionSpace, CollectiveAccess, and CollectionSpace also support governed workflows with entity-driven modeling and authority controls when shared cataloging and approvals require strong data governance.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several recurring implementation and workflow pitfalls show up across museum collections tools and can derail adoption even when the feature set looks complete.
Choosing a highly configurable platform without planning for training and implementation time
Arches, CollectiveAccess, and CollectionSpace all offer deep configuration for data models and workflows, but that depth increases implementation time and requires staff training. Goobi also needs museum-domain knowledge and time investment because it connects approval workflows across cataloging, digitization, and publication pipelines.
Expecting flexible workflows without adequate support for field logic and customization
PastPerfect has limited customization for complex workflows and field logic beyond core templates, which can force process workarounds. Vernon Systems MIMSY can also require careful local setup, and advanced reporting often needs careful setup rather than simple GUI building.
Underestimating how workflow templates and field configuration affect usability
Gallery Systems reports that user interface efficiency depends on how templates and fields are configured, which means poor configuration can slow registrar and curator tasks. CollectionSpace also has a complex user interface for day-to-day catalogers when workflows are not tuned to local roles.
Ignoring media and digital publication workflow needs when they drive daily operations
Goobi is built around workflow management for cataloging, digitization, and publication with approval traceability, so institutions that need outward-facing pipelines should prioritize it. Axiell PastPerfect and PastPerfect provide strong object record images, but media workflows can feel basic compared with DAM-first digital systems when digitization and rights-aware presentation drive the process.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated each museum collection management platform on three sub-dimensions with explicit weights: features at 0.4, ease of use at 0.3, and value at 0.3. The overall rating is computed as a weighted average of those three components using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Gallery Systems separated itself from lower-ranked tools by delivering a museum-specific workflow focus that strongly supports object movement and status tracking tied to item-level documentation and media, which translates into high feature strength for stewardship operations. This same focus also aligns with how the platform is positioned for collections teams that need structured metadata, vocab controls, and audit-ready histories across time.
Frequently Asked Questions About Museum Collection Management Software
Which museum collection management system best supports accessioning and audit-ready documentation in one workflow?
PastPerfect fits museums that need accession records and object documentation tied to images, donor history, and inventory reporting. Axiell PastPerfect adds stronger accession and movement tracking with audit-friendly cataloging at steady scale.
What software handles object movement, status changes, and location tracking with item-level media records?
Gallery Systems is built for museum-grade stewardship where object movement and status changes attach to item-level documentation and media. TMS also supports museum operational status and links related materials like administrative events to the object record.
Which platforms are strongest for governed, relationship-rich collection data and standards-aligned exports?
Arches supports configurable entities, controlled vocabularies, and relationship mapping across collections, objects, places, and people. CollectionSpace emphasizes an entity-driven model that links objects, events, agents, and documentation while supporting authority control and standards-aware cataloging.
Which tools manage complex provenance and agent relationships with authority-controlled names across multiple languages?
CollectiveAccess stands out with configurable object, agent, and collection relationships plus authority-controlled names and thesauri. Arches also supports relationship-rich modeling, but CollectiveAccess is the more direct fit for multi-language authority workflows.
Which solution fits museums that need digitization-to-publication workflows with approvals and rights-aware handling?
Goobi connects digitization, metadata enrichment, and publication using workflow steps with approval traceability. It is complemented by rights-aware digital asset handling and authority support for consistent metadata across outward presentation.
What software best supports structured museum cataloging with configurable workflows for acquisitions, loans, and conservation actions?
CollectionSpace supports configurable workflows for acquisitions, loans, and conservation actions across structured records and roles. Vernon Systems MIMSY is also workflow-driven and supports conservation or condition-related tracking tailored to museum documentation practices.
Which systems are designed for consistent metadata editing across large backlogs with controlled terminology and change tracking?
Axiell PastPerfect supports multi-field searches, controlled vocabularies, and reporting that tracks collections status and who changed what and when. Vernon Systems MIMSY focuses on repeatable, role-driven workflows with authority control and controlled terminology for consistent catalog metadata.
How do these tools support linking related materials such as media, documentation, and administrative events to core object records?
TMS links media, documentation, and administrative events to the object record to keep provenance attached to each item. Gallery Systems likewise keeps images and stewardship documentation connected to object movements and condition or location tracking.
What are common integration and interoperability considerations when comparing museum collection management software?
Arches provides API access and exchange-friendly data structures designed for standards-aligned data export and integration. Goobi emphasizes workflow integration around digitization pipelines, while CollectiveAccess and CollectionSpace focus on authority-driven metadata that maps cleanly into publication-ready records.
Which option is best for getting a museum system operational with shared governance across departments rather than a simple catalog view?
CollectionSpace is built for shared governance with authority management and configurable workflows across teams for cataloging, acquisitions, loans, and conservation. Gallery Systems also emphasizes collaborative, museum-specific stewardship records, but CollectionSpace is more oriented toward governed entity workflows across departments.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Digital Products And Software alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of digital products and software tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare digital products and software tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.