Commissioned Research
Top 11 Best Event Accounting Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Finance Financial Services

Top 11 Best Event Accounting Software of 2026

Compare event accounting software options for event finance teams, with tradeoffs and fit notes for planning, invoices, and reporting workflows.

19 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Event accounting software connects client billing, deposits, and payment flows to accounting records so finance teams can reconcile faster and track event profitability in a consistent data model. This comparison helps operators weigh tradeoffs between event-centric ERPs with built-in financial workflows and general cloud accounting platforms that rely on integrations and configuration for the event ledger layer.

EventPro is the best choice for event finance teams that need event-level allocation and approvals tied to month-end reconciliation because its invoice coding and posting rules keep a clear event audit trail, while Planning Pod fits smaller teams that want event settlement outputs for vendor and transaction coding without building custom logic.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

EventPro

Event-specific invoice coding and allocation rules that post to the general ledger with an event audit trail.

Best for: Fits when event finance teams need event-level allocation, approvals, and reconciliation built into month-end close.

2

Caterease

Editor pick

Event-coded approval workflows that keep invoice and expense transactions consistent through closeout.

Best for: Fits when event finance teams need event-coded approvals and closeout workflows without building custom accounting logic.

3

Total Party Planner

Editor pick

Purchase order matching workflow ties approvals to invoice coding for event-specific actuals and closeout summaries.

Best for: Fits when event teams need consistent purchase-to-invoice coding and event closeout reporting.

Comparison Table

1
EventProBest overall
vertical specialist
9.0/10
Overall
2
vertical specialist
8.9/10
Overall
3
vertical specialist
8.6/10
Overall
4
8.4/10
Overall
5
vertical specialist
8.1/10
Overall
6
7.8/10
Overall
7
vertical specialist
7.5/10
Overall
8
enterprise
7.1/10
Overall
9
6.9/10
Overall
10
SMB
6.5/10
Overall
11
6.0/10
Overall
#1

EventPro

vertical specialist

Event management software with invoicing, payments, budgeting, and accounting integrations.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Event-specific invoice coding and allocation rules that post to the general ledger with an event audit trail.

EventPro is an event-focused accounting system that connects event budgets, vendor spend, and revenue workflows to period close activities. The tool is built around event-level financial tracking, including invoice coding and expense allocation by event and cost center.

EventPro also supports reconciliation workflows for payment receipts and settlement statements so ledgers can reflect what actually cleared. Governance features center on approvals, audit trails, and role-based controls to keep event changes traceable through event closeout.

Pros
  • +Event-level chart of accounts mappings for consistent ledger posting
  • +Workflow approvals help control invoice coding changes by event
  • +Audit trail records who changed event financial records and when
  • +Reconciliation workflows align receipts and settlement statements to books
Cons
  • –Limited multi-entity intercompany accounting depth for complex groups
  • –Few automation hooks for PO matching beyond standard workflows
  • –Advanced reporting requires more setup than basic event summaries
  • –Integrations depend on supported connectors and defined data mappings
Use scenarios
  • Event finance managers

    Track vendor invoices by event and cost center

    Faster, cleaner event close

  • Revenue operations teams

    Reconcile receipts to settlement statements

    Reduced reconciliation write-offs

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Project accountants

    Maintain audit trails for event changes

    Improved governance and compliance

    Use approvals and role-based controls to keep event adjustments traceable through closeout.

  • Event operations leadership

    Monitor budgets against actual spend

    Earlier variance detection

    Connect event budgets to vendor spending workflows to surface variances during month-end close.

Best for: Fits when event finance teams need event-level allocation, approvals, and reconciliation built into month-end close.

#2

Caterease

vertical specialist

Catering and event management software with billing, deposits, and accounting integration.

8.9/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Event-coded approval workflows that keep invoice and expense transactions consistent through closeout.

Caterease supports event teams with accounting workflows that map expenses and invoices to specific events and reporting periods. The system organizes event closeout activities around allocations, coding fields, and reconciled payment records.

It also supports automation through configurable intake steps for vendor invoices and expense entries tied to event identifiers. Administration features focus on controlling who can create, edit, and approve transactions that roll into event-level financial reporting.

Pros
  • +Event-specific coding for expenses and vendor invoices
  • +Configurable intake steps reduce rework across accounts payable
  • +Approvals and audit trail support controlled event closeout
  • +Reconciled transaction history improves settlement statement preparation
Cons
  • –Multi-event consolidation needs disciplined event identifiers
  • –Some reporting views lag behind custom event accounting requirements
  • –Automation coverage depends on how intake forms are configured
  • –Integration depth varies by source system for reconciliation inputs
Use scenarios
  • Event finance managers

    Close event books by allocation rules

    Faster, audit-ready event closes

  • Accounts payable teams

    Route vendor invoices into event codes

    Reduced misposting and rework

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Event operations controllers

    Track expenses tied to specific events

    Cleaner event cost visibility

    Captures expense entries with event-level identifiers and supports approvals feeding reporting rollups.

  • Controller and compliance leads

    Control approvals and editing permissions

    Stronger controls on transactions

    Restricts who can create, edit, and approve transactions before they reach financial reporting.

Best for: Fits when event finance teams need event-coded approvals and closeout workflows without building custom accounting logic.

#3

Total Party Planner

vertical specialist

Catering management software covering proposals, contracts, invoices, and event profitability.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Purchase order matching workflow ties approvals to invoice coding for event-specific actuals and closeout summaries.

Total Party Planner centers on event-level financial control, with the ability to map vendors and documents to event budgets and specific accounting codes. It supports purchase order matching to invoices and assigns expense items to event allocations so reporting by event stays consistent during the month. Event closeout reporting helps summarize what was accrued or paid and packages results for internal review.

A key tradeoff is that Total Party Planner is strongest for event bookkeeping workflows rather than broad general ledger automation, so integrations to a full enterprise ledger may require process coordination. It fits well when a marketing or operations team runs a steady cadence of events and needs repeatable purchase-to-invoice handling without building custom accounting logic.

Pros
  • +Event-scoped budget tracking keeps expenses and commitments aligned
  • +Purchase order matching reduces coding drift between approvals and invoices
  • +Closeout reporting summarizes event financial outcomes in one place
  • +Reusable event setup supports consistent bookkeeping across a program
Cons
  • –Not designed for deep general ledger automation beyond event workflows
  • –Integration depth depends on accounting system connectivity and mapping
  • –Multi-entity governance requires careful ownership of events and codes
  • –Advanced accrual modeling may require manual review steps
Use scenarios
  • Event finance teams

    Code vendor invoices to event budgets

    Cleaner event actuals

  • Operations leads

    Reconcile spend during event closeout

    Faster event closeout

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Accounting managers

    Standardize purchase approvals to invoicing

    Fewer coding discrepancies

    Purchase order matching reduces exceptions between procurement commitments and vendor invoices.

  • Multi-event programs

    Consolidate results across events

    Unified financial visibility

    Multi-event reporting rolls event financials into consolidated program views for review.

Best for: Fits when event teams need consistent purchase-to-invoice coding and event closeout reporting.

#4

Planning Pod

SMB

Event business software with budgeting, invoicing, payments, and client management.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.4/10
Value8.4/10
Standout feature

Event settlement statement outputs that align vendor and transaction coding to event closeout reporting.

Planning Pod captures event financials from budgets through posting and closeout. Expense allocation by event is supported with structured categories, vendor coding, and event-level reporting outputs for finance teams.

Pros
  • +Event-level expense allocation keeps spend traceable to specific events
  • +Budget to actuals reporting supports month-end closeout workflows
  • +Vendor invoice coding reduces manual rework during reconciliation
  • +Settlement statement style outputs fit organizer finance handoffs
Cons
  • –Multi-event consolidation requires disciplined chart mapping across events
  • –Accounts payable integration coverage depends on supported invoice inputs
  • –Automation is limited without deeper API-driven workflow control
  • –Deferred revenue behavior needs careful policy configuration

Best for: Fits when event finance teams need event-by-event actuals and accrual tracking with clear vendor coding.

#5

Tripleseat

vertical specialist

Event sales and management software with contracts, payments, and financial integrations.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Event-centered billing with proposal-to-invoice traceability for deposits, adjustments, and final balances.

Tripleseat manages events by coordinating venue workflows, proposals, and invoicing from lead to payment. It also supports accounting handoff workflows by linking event charges, deposits, and settlements to financial records used by back-office teams.

Pros
  • +Event billing workflows map directly to event timelines and statuses
  • +Clear deposit and balance tracking reduces payment context gaps
  • +Configurable templates support consistent proposal-to-invoice outputs
  • +Audit-friendly histories for event quotes, invoices, and payments
Cons
  • –General ledger mapping depends on external accounting setup
  • –Multi-entity consolidation requires additional finance-side processes
  • –Expense allocation granularity can lag behind true cost-center accounting
  • –Automation depth is limited for vendor invoice coding workflows

Best for: Fits when event-driven revenue needs tight billing control and finance needs dependable transaction context.

#6

QuickBooks Online

SMB

Cloud accounting software for income, expenses, invoices, payments, and reporting.

7.8/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Automated recurring transactions and bank feed reconciliation reduce repetitive deposit and payment posting work across events.

QuickBooks Online fits event finance teams that need general-ledger accounting plus day-to-day invoicing and bill coding in one workflow. It supports accrual-basis reporting, automatic bank feeds reconciliation, and recurring transactions that reduce manual effort during event cycles.

Pros
  • +Accrual-basis and cash-basis reporting support covers event actuals and accruals
  • +Bank feed reconciliation reduces time spent matching bank transactions
  • +API and app integrations move invoices, bills, and payments into the ledger
  • +Recurring transactions speed repeated deposits, fees, and monthly allocations
Cons
  • –Event-closeout needs disciplined journal entry and dimension mapping
  • –Ticket revenue recognition workflows require external processes or add-ons
  • –Multi-event consolidation is limited without careful parent-child account structure
  • –Some event-specific controls need add-on configuration and governance oversight

Best for: Fits when event teams need GL reporting with bank feed automation and integration-based workflows.

#7

Event Temple

vertical specialist

Sales and catering software with proposals, contracts, invoices, and payment processing.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.5/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Approval-driven budget to actual workflow that ties spend decisions to event closeout status updates.

Event Temple is geared toward event operations teams that need consistent event actuals and closeout outputs without building custom spreadsheets for each program. Budget tracking and approval flows provide a structured path from planned spend to posted costs. Vendor invoice coding and expense allocations are designed to keep line items traceable to the event ledger views used at closeout.

Pros
  • +Event-linked budget to actual workflow reduces closeout rework
  • +Invoice coding keeps vendor line items traceable to event ledger views
  • +Expense allocation rules support consistent multi-event reporting
  • +Automation reduces manual reconciliation between operations and finance
Cons
  • –Requires upfront mapping of chart and dimensions to event fields
  • –Advanced reconciliation needs disciplined data quality from upstream systems
  • –Cross-system audit trails may require additional export or reporting steps
  • –Bulk portfolio operations can feel slower with heavily customized workflows
Use scenarios
  • Event finance managers

    Standardize invoice coding per event

    Faster event closeout

  • Event operations teams

    Control spend through approvals

    Less variance surprises

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Accounting analysts

    Reconcile settlements to events

    Cleaner reconciliation packets

    Compares settlement inputs to event-level revenue outputs for portfolio reporting consistency.

  • Multi-event program leaders

    Allocate costs across events

    More accurate event actuals

    Uses repeatable allocation logic to split shared costs and maintain event-level actuals.

Best for: Fits when event teams need budget-to-closeout control with repeatable invoice coding and allocations.

#8

Sage Intacct

enterprise

Cloud financial management software with multi-entity accounting, billing, and reporting.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

Transaction posting automation that routes AP and AR activity into event-specific accounting structures consistently.

Event finance teams use Sage Intacct to code vendor invoices, allocate expenses by event, and maintain consistent postings into the general ledger. Its automation supports approval and posting flows that reduce manual rekeying when events create frequent deposits, retainers, and milestone charges. It is a strong fit when event closeout depends on repeatable workflows across venues, programs, and calendar periods.

Pros
  • +Configurable posting rules keep event coding consistent across transactions
  • +API supports data movement between event systems and the financial ledger
  • +Automation reduces manual steps during AP to GL posting cycles
  • +Multi-entity reporting supports consolidation workflows for event portfolios
Cons
  • –Event chart and dimension mapping require upfront governance
  • –Complex event structures can increase admin overhead for maintenance
Use scenarios
  • Finance operations teams

    AP coding by event and cost

    Faster event close and fewer corrections

  • Revenue accounting teams

    Accrual tracking for ticket and sponsorship

    More consistent revenue reporting

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Shared services accounting teams

    Multi-event consolidation and reporting

    Unified event financial views

    Standardized chart configuration supports event portfolio reporting across multiple legal entities.

  • Systems integration teams

    API sync between ticketing and ledger

    Reduced rekeying and improved traceability

    The API enables controlled data exchange that supports reconciliation and audit trail alignment.

Best for: Fits when event finance needs GL-grade controls with automated AP and AR workflows across multiple events.

#9

Perfect Venue

SMB

Venue management software with event bookings, proposals, invoices, and payment tracking.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Purchase order matching that links vendor invoices back to event-coded commitments before closeout reporting.

Perfect Venue targets event operators that need accounting outputs tied to event budgets, vendors, and cashflow events. It supports purchase order style spend tracking and vendor invoice coding so costs land against the right event and ledger mapping.

Pros
  • +Event-level spend coding ties vendor costs to the right event context
  • +Purchase order matching reduces invoice and budget mismatches
  • +Event closeout reporting supports operational finance handoff
  • +Role-based controls limit who can post and adjust financial records
Cons
  • –Limited visibility into cross-event consolidation workflows for large portfolios
  • –Automation and API surface are thin for integration-heavy accounting stacks
  • –Accrual and deferred revenue workflows are not as granular as some competitors
  • –Reporting exports depend on manual mapping for complex chart structures

Best for: Fits when event operators need controlled PO-to-invoice workflows and event-level actuals reporting without heavy engineering.

#10

Xero

SMB

Cloud accounting software with invoicing, bank reconciliation, expenses, and reporting.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Double-entry journal control with bank feed matching and audit history supports event closeout workflows.

Xero differentiates event accounting by connecting a multi-entity general ledger to bank feeds, invoice workflows, and journal posting through a consistent accounting core. Event teams can code vendor bills, allocate expenses, and reconcile payments while keeping a single set of books with audit-ready change history.

Pros
  • +Bank feed rules reduce reconciliation effort across event payment flows
  • +Journal entries can be structured for event period closeout and accrual timing
  • +Extensive app ecosystem for invoice capture and event-related integrations
  • +Strong audit trail on changes to invoices, bills, and journals
Cons
  • –Native event budgeting and actuals views are limited compared with event-first tools
  • –Event chart of accounts and cost center structures require deliberate setup
  • –Accrual workflows depend heavily on configured processes and add-on support
  • –Multi-event consolidation often needs external reporting or app-based automation

Best for: Fits when event finance teams need GL-grade reporting with bank reconciliation and integrations across invoices and bills.

#11

Zoho Books

SMB

Online accounting software with invoicing, expenses, project tracking, and payment collection.

6.0/10
Overall
Features6.0/10
Ease of Use6.0/10
Value6.0/10
Standout feature

Project-based expense allocation maps event costs into the general ledger without manual reclass at month-end.

Zoho Books is event accounting software that ties invoices, bills, and bank activity to a shared general ledger with multi-entity support. It covers core event finance workflows like vendor invoice coding, expense allocation to projects or cost centers, and reconciliation of transactions into accounts payable and accounts receivable.

Pros
  • +Fast invoice and bill workflows with document templates for event teams
  • +Supports organization-wide accounting structure across multiple companies
  • +Recurring transactions reduce manual re-entry for regular event vendors
  • +Bank reconciliation pulls activity into consistent ledger postings
Cons
  • –Event-specific closeout tasks need external process design and templates
  • –Sponsorship and ticket revenue recognition workflows are not built for event schedules
  • –Purchase order matching and settlement statement workflows are limited
  • –Reporting is strong for general ledger, but event-by-event rollups need setup

Best for: Fits when event teams need reliable invoicing, bills, and reconciled ledger postings.

Conclusion

After evaluating 11 event accounting software, EventPro stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
EventPro

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Event Accounting Software

How do event accounting tools map source transactions to an event chart of accounts without reclass at month-end?
EventPro and Planning Pod use event-level expense allocation rules that persist through period close, so vendor invoice coding carries into event actuals and accrual outputs. QuickBooks Online and Xero rely on the chart of accounts plus dimensions like class and location style tracking, so teams must set consistent mapping before reports by event stay stable.
Which platform handles purchase order matching to invoices most directly for event closeout workflows?
Perfect Venue and Total Party Planner link purchase order style commitments to vendor invoices with event-coded spend context before closeout reporting. Sage Intacct can do invoice and approval automation that supports PO-to-actual discipline, but teams still need upfront dimension and mapping configuration to keep event reporting coherent.
When do event teams typically enter accruals and deferred revenue, and how do tools support the timing?
Planning Pod and Event Temple align deposits and settlement statement-style reconciliation to closeout steps so accrual-basis and event actuals views reflect the same cutover. QuickBooks Online and Zoho Books support accrual-basis reporting, but the accrual timing depends on when bills, invoices, and journal entries get posted into the general ledger.
How do integrations work for syncing registration revenue, payments, and settlement activity into the accounting ledger?
QuickBooks Online and Xero use bank feeds plus app ecosystems to sync payments and reconcile deposits into the accounting core. Sage Intacct and EventPro focus more on AP and AR workflows, so teams typically sync customer and payment activity into accounts receivable integration and then map it into event-level reporting through coding rules.
What API coverage and automation pathways exist for event accounting administration and throughput?
QuickBooks Online exposes an API surface that supports syncing customers, payments, bills, and journal entries into the general ledger. Xero and Sage Intacct also provide API-based integrations, but automation throughput depends on how event teams batch transaction creation and apply mapping rules consistently across events.
How do tools handle SSO, RBAC, and audit trail expectations for event finance and approvals?
EventPro and Caterease emphasize role-based controls and audit visibility for changes that roll into event-level reporting. Xero and Sage Intacct support administrative security patterns like RBAC and audit history, but event closeout governance still depends on how organizations structure roles around event close workflows.
What data migration steps are usually required when switching from spreadsheets or a legacy ledger into event-coded accounting?
Event Temple and Total Party Planner typically require a migration that converts existing event identifiers into fields used for allocations, invoice coding, and closeout reporting. QuickBooks Online and Xero migrations often focus on bringing in the chart of accounts plus historical bank rules and dimensions, which then must be revalidated against event reporting outputs.
How does schema or configuration setup affect event reporting when the organization runs multi-event consolidation?
Sage Intacct and EventPro depend on how dimension mapping routes transactions into event-level structures used in reporting, so configuration choices directly shape multi-event consolidation. QuickBooks Online and Xero support multi-entity general ledger patterns, but consistent event filters and dimension naming are required so consolidated reporting does not mix event contexts.
Where does event-close automation fall short, and what breaks if event coding is inconsistent before approvals?
Event Temple can produce repeatable budget-to-closeout outputs, but inconsistent mapping of chart of accounts and event dimensions into Event Temple fields can cause exports that require manual cleanup. EventPro and Event Temple similarly break down when invoice coding and expense allocations do not use the same event identifiers during approvals, because closeout views reflect the coded ledger state rather than the intended event structure.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Event Accounting Software

Event accounting software differs most in how each tool keeps event-by-event money accurate after changes. Prioritize integration breadth and API automation surface, plus how cleanly it supports accrual reporting and multi-event close.

Event-to-ledger mapping

Why it matters

Event-to-ledger mapping determines whether entries stay traceable when you review results per event and when totals roll up. If mapping is weak, you end up guessing which event drove a ledger line.

How to check

In a demo, ask to import or enter a few sample transactions tagged to different events, then open the resulting ledger view. Export a report that shows each event’s lines and confirm they reconcile to the ledger totals shown.

Accrual and cash reporting views

Why it matters

Accrual and cash reporting views matter because event finance often closes with outstanding items while leadership wants current cash. If both views aren’t consistent, you can’t compare budgets, forecasts, and close outcomes.

How to check

Run the same sample data through both views during the demo. Compare invoice timing or revenue recognition behavior between views and check whether the system shows clear differences, not conflicting numbers.

API and automation for finance data

Why it matters

API and automation for finance data reduce manual re-keying when events and costs change late. Strong automation also makes it easier to standardize data models across teams.

How to check

Ask for an example API endpoint or automation workflow that creates or updates event finance records. Try a small configuration: change an event attribute and confirm what updates automatically versus what requires manual edits.

Close controls with audit log

Why it matters

Close controls with audit log protect the story behind adjustments, especially when staff revise transactions before the final pack. Without it, you can’t defend what changed or when.

How to check

In the demo, simulate making an adjustment after a draft close, then open the audit log for that event. Ask who can lock, whether approvals are tracked, and whether reversals keep the history intact.

Multi-event reporting rollups

Why it matters

Multi-event reporting rollups help you produce portfolio views without breaking traceability back to each event. If rollups are only cosmetic, totals won’t match event-level detail.

How to check

Generate a rollup across multiple events and then drill back from a category total to the underlying event lines. Confirm the rollup respects filters like date range, event owner, or status.

Red flags

  • Event-to-ledger numbers don’t drill down to specific event entries
  • Accrual and cash views disagree without a clear explanation
  • Close changes lack an audit log or locking behavior

Fit by situation

  • If you need finance numbers to stay traceable per event and tie out to the ledger, prioritize Event-to-ledger mapping.
  • If your team closes with outstanding items and also reports cash activity, prioritize Accrual and cash reporting views.
  • If you manage many events and frequently update them late, prioritize Close controls with audit log.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.