GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Education LearningTop 10 Best Asu Student Software of 2026
Top 10 Asu Student Software rankings for ASU students, comparing Canvas, Google Classroom, Khan Academy, plus key features and tradeoffs.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Canvas
Gradebook rubrics with assignment linkage for consistent feedback across submissions
Built for aSU courses needing modular LMS delivery with robust grading and assessment.
Google Classroom
Editor pickAssignment grading with rubrics and returning feedback tied to student submissions
Built for schools standardizing on Google tools for assignment distribution and grading.
Khan Academy
Editor pickMastery system that recommends next exercises based on performance history
Built for aSU student practice for skills with mastery tracking and instant feedback.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates Asu student software tools by integration depth, including SIS and LMS connections, data model and schema behavior, and the API and automation surface for provisioning and course operations. It also contrasts admin and governance controls such as RBAC, audit log coverage, configuration options, and extensibility for data sync and third-party deployments. Readers can use these dimensions to map tradeoffs for throughput, sandboxing, and how each platform fits common campus workflows.
Canvas
LMSCanvas LMS delivers course pages, assignments, grading workflows, quizzes, and learning analytics for schools and instructors.
Gradebook rubrics with assignment linkage for consistent feedback across submissions
Canvas stands out for its clean course UI and deep Instructure ecosystem integration. It supports assignment workflows, gradebook grading, discussions, and messaging tied to course sections.
Faculty can publish modules, use rubrics, and deliver content with quizzes and media-friendly tools. Accessibility tools and analytics help instructors monitor engagement and keep instructional delivery consistent across courses.
- +Strong course modules with clear sequencing and item-level controls
- +Gradebook supports rubrics, categories, and calculated totals for consistent grading
- +Discussions, announcements, and messaging keep student communication organized
- +Quizzes and assignments integrate smoothly with submissions and feedback
- –Admin and course setup complexity rises with large programs and many sections
- –Some workflows feel slower when managing large numbers of students
- –Customization can require more training than instructors expect
- –Reporting views can be limiting without additional configuration
Program directors and faculty coordinating multi-instructor courses
Managing shared course structures with consistent grading, modules, and communication across multiple sections
Programs maintain grading consistency and reduce course-to-course variation across staff.
Instructors teaching standards-based or rubric-driven assessment
Grading assignments with rubric criteria and tracking student performance in the gradebook
Students receive criterion-based feedback and instructors produce comparable grades across sections.
Show 2 more scenarios
Academic support staff and accessibility-focused instructors
Improving accessibility of course materials and supporting students with accommodation needs
Courses provide more consistent accessible experiences that reduce barriers during instruction and assessment.
Canvas includes built-in accessibility tools and supports accessible content authoring workflows. It also helps instructors maintain consistent delivery of quizzes, media, and learning materials within course modules.
Course coordinators monitoring student engagement
Using analytics to identify students who need intervention and to monitor participation trends
Intervention efforts become more timely by focusing on students showing low participation or activity.
Canvas provides analytics that help instructors and coordinators track engagement patterns. Faculty can use these signals to adjust course delivery and target support for students within a course term.
Best for: ASU courses needing modular LMS delivery with robust grading and assessment
More related reading
Google Classroom
assignment managementGoogle Classroom organizes classes, distributes assignments, collects submissions, and integrates grading with Google tools.
Assignment grading with rubrics and returning feedback tied to student submissions
Google Classroom is a teacher-facing hub that connects assignments, grading, and class messaging to Google Drive and Google Docs. Teachers can create assignments that include files or link to Drive folders, then students submit work inside the same Classroom flow. Rubric grading supports criteria-based scoring and can stream feedback back into the gradebook, which keeps communication tied to specific submissions.
Top enrichment fields depend on the review structure, so this tool maps to a classroom workflow where assessment feedback and returned drafts stay linked to the original Drive items. Version history in Drive helps students see changes after feedback is returned, which is useful for iterative writing and revision cycles. A notable tradeoff is that deeper customization of workflows and grading logic is limited compared with dedicated assessment platforms, which can require workarounds for complex grading rules.
Google Classroom fits best when teachers already standardize on Google Docs and Drive for instruction, submission, and recordkeeping. It also fits classes that need consistent communication, because announcements and class comments remain connected to the course space. When schools require offline assignment authoring or advanced analytics across multiple systems, Classroom may fall short and other tools may be needed.
- +Native assignment creation with Drive-backed submission folders
- +Rubrics and reusable feedback speed up consistent grading
- +Easy student access via class code and managed roster uploads
- –Limited built-in analytics for deep academic performance insights
- –Grade export and advanced workflows require outside integrations
- –Stream and comment history can become hard to search at scale
Secondary school teachers grading writing and revision cycles
Assign draft 1, return feedback as rubric comments, then collect draft 2 with Drive version history
Students receive structured rubric feedback while drafts stay auditable across revision rounds.
Elementary school teachers managing paper-to-digital workflow during class rotations
Collect multimodal submissions by file upload and organize them in Drive per student
Submitted work is centralized in Drive and grading records are kept in Classroom in one sequence.
Show 2 more scenarios
School administrators and department teams standardizing class communication routines
Use announcements and class topics to coordinate recurring tasks like weekly homework and reminders
Students receive consistent, referenceable instructions with fewer mismatches between messages and assignments.
Teachers post announcements in the class stream and link assignments stored in Drive so students and guardians can see the same task references. Graded items remain tied to the assignment thread, which reduces confusion about which work matches which grade.
Virtual learning coordinators coordinating asynchronous submissions for multiple classes
Run batch assignment distribution and grading across several courses using consistent Drive structures
Across multiple courses, assignment flow remains consistent and submission records stay linked to stored work.
Teachers can create assignments per class, reuse Drive links and folders, and grade with rubrics while keeping feedback attached to the submission. Students submit through Classroom interfaces that connect back to Drive items for later review.
Best for: Schools standardizing on Google tools for assignment distribution and grading
Khan Academy
learning contentKhan Academy provides practice exercises, instructional videos, and progress tracking for academic skill building.
Mastery system that recommends next exercises based on performance history
Khan Academy stands out with its large library of skill lessons, practice exercises, and videos organized around mastery goals. Students get instant feedback through interactive exercises and progress dashboards that track mastery by topic.
Educators and families can assign practice for specific standards-aligned skills and monitor completion and accuracy. The platform works well as a structured supplement for individual learners who need targeted practice.
- +Interactive practice provides immediate feedback on math, science, and more
- +Mastery learning dashboards show topic-level progress and likely next steps
- +Teacher assignments support targeted practice aligned to specific skills
- –Content depth varies by subject and sometimes repeats at similar difficulty
- –Progress dashboards focus on completion and accuracy, not rich competency evidence
- –Advanced classroom workflows and assessments need more external tooling
Middle school students who need targeted practice for math grade-level skills
Completing skill lessons and practice exercises mapped to mastery goals after classroom instruction
Fewer missed concepts during assessments because practice is focused on the skills still not mastered.
High school students preparing for standardized testing
Using practice sets and topic-based recommendations to review weak areas in reading or math
Improved performance on test sections by concentrating study time on the lowest-mastery topics.
Show 2 more scenarios
K-12 teachers assigning differentiated skills across a class
Assigning standards-aligned practice for specific learning goals and reviewing completion and accuracy
More consistent remediation across students because assignments can target the exact skills causing gaps.
Educators can distribute targeted exercises and use dashboards to see which skills students have completed and how accurately they perform.
Families supporting learning at home for multiple children
Coordinating independent practice on devices while monitoring progress for each child
Reduced time spent guessing what to practice because progress tracking identifies the next skills to work on.
Families can review dashboards that show mastery progress by topic and encourage follow-through on assigned practice.
Best for: ASU student practice for skills with mastery tracking and instant feedback
More related reading
Coursera
MOOCCoursera delivers instructor-led courses with assessments and certificates, with guided learning paths and peer forums.
Guided project and capstone assignments inside structured specializations
Coursera stands out with course delivery that combines video instruction, structured weekly assignments, and peer- and instructor-graded assessments across many academic and industry topics. The platform supports self-paced learning and cohort-style learning tied to specific course calendars, which helps students plan milestones. Guided capstone projects and specialization paths enable deeper skill progression inside domains like data science, business, and computer science.
- +Large catalog with consistent assignment and grading patterns
- +Specializations and guided paths support multi-course skill building
- +Mobile apps make video learning and quiz practice accessible
- +Peer grading and rubrics help scale feedback for assignments
- –Hands-on depth varies significantly across individual courses
- –Grading timelines can feel slow for time-sensitive coursework
- –Course navigation and syllabus details can be inconsistent
- –Not designed for complex team collaboration or project management
Best for: ASU students building job-ready skills with structured, instructor-led learning paths
edX
MOOCedX offers university and industry courses with graded assignments, verified credentials, and cohort or self-paced options.
Courseware analytics for learner progress tied to video, quizzes, and assignment completion
edX stands out for its large catalog of structured courses delivered through a MOOC-style learning experience. Learners get video lectures, quizzes, and guided assignments tied to course pages that track progress.
Many courses also offer graded work and certificates, with professional programs available through specific partner offerings. Discussion forums and peer interaction are present but vary by course rather than being consistent platformwide.
- +Large catalog with many disciplines and course formats
- +Quizzes, timed assessments, and assignment workflows inside courses
- +Progress tracking and completion cues help learners stay on track
- –Course experience varies significantly by instructor and partner
- –Limited built-in learning analytics for institutions beyond course reporting
- –Discussion quality and activity depend heavily on each course
Best for: ASU students supplementing coursework with reputable, structured online learning
Quizlet
flashcardsQuizlet creates study sets, drills with flashcards and practice modes, and supports shared classroom learning content.
Study modes with adaptive review in Learn mode
Quizlet stands out for turning course content into reusable study sets, with instant activities driven by flashcards. It supports multiple study modes like Learn and game-style practice, plus quizzes that help reinforce recall.
Students can import and share sets, use images in card decks, and collaborate through class tools designed for coursework. The platform also offers analytics that track performance over time for users and classes.
- +Flashcard-first workflow with fast creation and editing for coursework review
- +Multiple study modes like Learn and practice games for repeated retrieval
- +Import tools and image support for building richer study sets quickly
- +Sharing and class features help students align on common decks
- –Learning outcomes depend on user-quality decks and consistent updates
- –Shared content quality varies across public sets and duplicates are common
- –Deeper assessments require extra setup beyond basic quiz practice
- –Reliance on card granularity can oversimplify complex concepts
Best for: ASU students building reusable flashcard study decks for exam prep
More related reading
Notion
productivityNotion supports course notes, databases, calendars, and task workflows using pages and customizable templates.
Relational databases with linked records and multiple custom views
Notion stands out for turning notes, documents, databases, and dashboards into one interconnected workspace. It supports relational database views for assignments, research trackers, and class dashboards, plus templates for repeatable workflows. Asu student needs are served by flexible sharing, permission control per workspace or page, and fast capture via pages, links, and embedded content.
- +Relational databases help track courses, tasks, and research without separate tools
- +Templates and reusable page blocks speed up recurring study and planning workflows
- +Fast page linking creates a navigable knowledge base for notes and resources
- +Shared pages and permission controls support group projects and peer study
- –Database setup and view configuration can feel complex for simple note-taking
- –Offline access and mobile editing can lag behind desktop experience
Best for: Students building custom study dashboards and searchable knowledge bases
Microsoft Teams
collaborationMicrosoft Teams enables class communication with chat, meetings, file sharing, and assignment distribution via integrations.
Meeting recordings with searchable transcript transcripts inside Teams
Microsoft Teams stands out for unifying chat, meetings, and file collaboration inside one workspace with tight Microsoft 365 integration. It supports scheduled meetings, live captions, meeting recordings, and structured calls for recurring class and group discussions.
Teams also provides channels for topic-based conversations, assignment-ready file sharing, and governance controls through admin and compliance features. For ASU student workflows, it works well as the default hub for course communication, document review, and lightweight coordination across student groups.
- +Channels organize course topics with clear conversation threading
- +Live meetings include captions and recording for repeat learning access
- +Microsoft 365 file coauthoring reduces version conflicts during group work
- +Integrates with Identity and permissions for controlled access to resources
- –Notification volume can overwhelm users during active course weeks
- –Channel sprawl makes it harder to find decisions across long semesters
- –Basic tasks like approvals and workflows need add-ons beyond native features
Best for: Course teams needing centralized chat, meetings, and coauthored files
More related reading
Zoom
video conferencingZoom provides live virtual classes and meetings with screen sharing, recordings, and classroom-friendly collaboration features.
Breakout Rooms with host controls for assigning and managing group discussions
Zoom stands out with highly configurable meeting experiences and extensive admin controls for large institutions. Core capabilities include HD video and audio, screen sharing, recording, breakout rooms, and interactive polling. The platform also supports integrations for calendar scheduling and third-party webinar workflows while scaling from small classes to large lectures.
- +Reliable HD video with stable audio across variable bandwidth
- +Breakout rooms support structured group work for classes and trainings
- +Local and cloud recording options with searchable meeting playback
- +Polling and reactions enable fast check-ins during live sessions
- –Admin setup can be complex for schools with strict policies
- –Large webinar workflows require careful practice and configuration
- –Recording and transcript outcomes depend on audio quality consistency
- –Resource use can spike on older devices during screen sharing
Best for: ASU classes and student teams needing dependable, interactive video instruction
Google Meet
video conferencingGoogle Meet runs real-time video sessions for online classes with live captions and calendar-based scheduling.
Live captions during meetings for accessibility and easier note-taking
Google Meet stands out for browser-first video meetings that integrate tightly with Google Workspace apps. It supports real-time captions, screen sharing, recording through Workspace controls, and meeting chat for coordination.
Administrators can manage access using Google identity, including domain-based controls for recurring sessions. The experience scales from ad-hoc calls to structured meetings without installing dedicated desktop tools.
- +Quick join via browser with consistent controls across devices
- +Live captions and multilingual transcripts support accessibility needs
- +Screen sharing and chat support practical classroom collaboration
- +Strong Google identity and Workspace integration for scheduled meetings
- –Advanced meeting management depends on Google Workspace admin settings
- –Large meetings can feel limited for heavy moderation workflows
- –Recording and retention capabilities vary by Workspace configuration
Best for: ASU classes and student groups needing reliable video meetings with Google accounts
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 education learning, Canvas stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Asu Student Software
This buyer’s guide covers Canvas, Google Classroom, Khan Academy, Coursera, edX, Quizlet, Notion, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet for ASU student-facing learning and class workflows. It focuses on integration depth, data model fit, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls.
The guide helps map each tool’s actual course, submission, practice, or communication workflows to an ASU environment that needs dependable provisioning, access control, and audit-friendly operations.
ASU student software that ties learning delivery, submissions, practice, and communication into one workflow
ASU student software is the set of platforms that deliver course content, collect and grade work, support practice, and coordinate communication across classes. Canvas and Google Classroom represent the two most direct “instruction plus submission plus grading” paths, with Canvas emphasizing gradebook rubrics and Google Classroom tying rubric grading and feedback to Drive-backed student submissions.
Tools like Khan Academy and Quizlet focus on practice loops with progress tracking, while Microsoft Teams and Zoom shift the center of gravity to class communication, meetings, and collaboration. In practice, the day-to-day problem solved is keeping student work, feedback, and participation connected to the right course objects and identities.
Evaluation criteria that map tool behavior to integration, automation, and governance needs
Integration depth matters because ASU workflows span learning objects, identities, documents, and meetings. Canvas fits tightly with the Instructure ecosystem and uses LTI to work with third-party learning tools, while Google Classroom connects assignments to Google Drive and Docs submissions.
A tool’s data model and automation surface determine how reliably it can represent courses, assignments, rubrics, sessions, and statuses across systems. Admin and governance controls determine whether access can be limited by identity and whether activity can be managed across large programs.
Assignment-to-submission data linkage
Canvas links quizzes and assignments to submissions and supports gradebook rubrics with assignment linkage for consistent feedback. Google Classroom returns rubric-based feedback tied to specific student submissions stored in Drive folders.
Rubric-grade workflows for consistent assessment
Canvas supports gradebook rubrics with calculated totals and grade categories for predictable grading workflows at course scale. Google Classroom rubric grading streams feedback back through the Classroom flow so feedback remains connected to the original submission.
Practice and mastery tracking with actionable next steps
Khan Academy uses a mastery system that recommends next exercises based on performance history, which supports targeted skill building. Quizlet adds adaptive review in Learn mode and highlights weak terms through performance tracking over time.
Course communication with searchable meeting context
Microsoft Teams provides meeting recordings with searchable transcripts so participation and decisions remain accessible after live sessions. Zoom supports breakout rooms with host controls to assign and manage group discussions during live instruction.
Identity-driven access and admin governance controls
Microsoft Teams integrates with Microsoft 365 identity and permissions for controlled access to resources inside channels. Google Meet supports domain-based controls for recurring sessions and administrative settings that govern recording and retention behavior.
Automation and extensibility surface via integrations and workspaces
Canvas uses LTI to connect with common third-party learning tools, which provides an integration path for external content and tooling. Notion supports relational databases with linked records and multiple custom views, which supports configuration-heavy workflows like course dashboards and research trackers without forcing a rigid LMS schema.
Decision framework for picking the right ASU student software tool by workflow fit
The starting point is mapping ASU-required workflows to the tool’s object model. If course outcomes and grading must connect to student submissions, Canvas and Google Classroom are the most direct fits because both attach rubric feedback to specific student work.
Next, evaluate whether the tool supports the automation and governance patterns needed for ASU operations. Admin controls and integration depth should be validated against identity, document, meeting, and reporting needs rather than against UI preferences.
Match the core workflow to an LMS object model
Choose Canvas when course sequencing uses modules plus gradebook rubrics and calculated totals tied to assignment workflows. Choose Google Classroom when standardized instruction relies on Google Docs and Drive-backed submission folders with rubric grading and returned feedback tied to those submissions.
Confirm data linkage for assessment and feedback
Use Canvas when consistent rubric-based feedback must stay connected across multiple submissions through gradebook linkage. Use Google Classroom when the feedback loop must return into the same Classroom flow and remain traceable to the Drive item version history.
Plan for practice loops that feed mastery evidence
Pick Khan Academy when mastery recommendations based on performance history must drive what students do next. Pick Quizlet when rapid flashcard-based retrieval practice needs adaptive review in Learn mode with performance tracking that surfaces weak terms.
Select communication tools based on governance and meeting artifacts
Pick Microsoft Teams when channels must organize course topic conversations and meeting recordings must have searchable transcripts. Pick Zoom when host-controlled breakout rooms are required for structured group discussion during live sessions.
Validate identity and admin control expectations
Choose Microsoft Teams when access is managed through Microsoft 365 identity and permissions for resources inside channels. Choose Google Meet when recurring sessions need domain-based identity controls and meeting recording and retention must be governed through Google Workspace admin settings.
Assess extensibility for ASU-specific workflows and data structures
Use Canvas when third-party learning tools must integrate through LTI to keep external content connected to course delivery. Use Notion when custom dashboards and relational task or research tracking need linked records and multiple views that can be configured around ASU program practices.
Who benefits most from each ASU student software tool
Different ASU student workflows map to different tool types, ranging from modular LMS delivery to practice-first mastery systems and communication hubs. Best-fit selection depends on whether the primary job is grading, skill practice, or class coordination.
The audience segments below map directly to each tool’s best-for fit so tool selection can focus on workflow outcomes rather than generic categories.
ASU course teams needing modular LMS delivery plus consistent grading
Canvas fits this segment because modules enable clear sequencing and the gradebook supports rubrics with assignment linkage and calculated totals for consistent feedback across submissions.
ASU instructors standardized on Google Docs and Drive for assignment submission
Google Classroom fits this segment because teachers create assignments that route student files into Drive-backed folders and rubric grading returns feedback tied to the submission flow.
ASU learners who need skill practice with mastery-based next steps
Khan Academy fits this segment because its mastery system recommends the next exercises based on performance history and provides topic-level progress dashboards.
ASU students building reusable exam-prep study decks and recall practice
Quizlet fits this segment because its Learn mode provides adaptive review and performance tracking that highlights weak terms across study sessions.
ASU course groups that need centralized collaboration with meetings and searchable artifacts
Microsoft Teams fits because meeting recordings include searchable transcripts and channels thread course topic conversations, while Zoom fits when breakout room host controls drive structured group work.
Common failure modes when implementing student software across ASU courses
Common failures come from mismatching tool data models to course workflows or underestimating admin setup and governance friction. These issues show up repeatedly across the reviewed tools and affect throughput when student volume grows.
Avoiding them requires checking rubric linkage, analytics expectations, meeting artifact access, and workflow complexity before committing to rollout.
Choosing a tool for general communication and then expecting it to replace grading workflows
Microsoft Teams organizes channels and coauthored files well, but approvals and workflows need add-ons beyond native features. If rubric-based grading must tie feedback to submissions, Canvas or Google Classroom provides the needed gradebook or rubric-return flow.
Overbuilding course delivery in tools that limit deep workflow customization
Google Classroom supports rubric grading tied to submissions but limits deeper customization of grading logic for complex rules. Canvas can handle more grading structure through grade categories and calculated totals, but admin and course setup complexity rises with large programs.
Expecting mastery or learning evidence from progress dashboards without the right assessment depth
Khan Academy progress dashboards emphasize completion and accuracy rather than rich competency evidence, and advanced assessment workflows require external tooling. Quizlet performance tracking supports recall practice, but deeper assessments require extra setup beyond basic quiz practice.
Ignoring analytics and reporting needs until after rollout at course scale
Canvas reporting views can be limiting without additional configuration when programs span many sections, and large-student workflows can feel slower during mass management. Google Classroom also limits built-in analytics for deep academic performance insights and relies on outside integrations for advanced workflows.
Underestimating admin policy work for large institution meeting access and recording
Zoom admin setup can become complex when strict policies and large webinar workflows are required. Google Meet meeting recording and retention capabilities vary with Google Workspace configuration, so governance settings must be aligned before recurring sessions.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Canvas, Google Classroom, Khan Academy, Coursera, edX, Quizlet, Notion, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet using editorial criteria that match real ASU student workflows. Each tool received a score driven by feature fit, ease of use for the intended operators, and value for the capabilities delivered, and features carried the largest weight with throughput and workflow behavior in mind. The overall rating is a weighted average where features counts for forty percent while ease of use and value each count for thirty percent.
Canvas earned the strongest lift for ASU-grade delivery needs because its gradebook supports rubrics with assignment linkage and calculated totals, which ties assessment artifacts to submissions in a way that reduces grading inconsistency. That capability aligns directly with the features weight, and it also supported Canvas’s position on ease of course structuring through module sequencing and item-level controls.
Frequently Asked Questions About Asu Student Software
How do Canvas and Google Classroom differ for assignment submission, grade linking, and feedback workflows?
Which tool supports skills practice with mastery tracking better, Khan Academy or Quizlet?
When should ASU students use Notion instead of a dedicated LMS tool like Canvas?
What integration and automation capabilities matter most for Teams versus Zoom in class coordination?
How do Google Meet and Zoom handle accessibility and meeting artifacts for review after class?
For structured online learning paths, how do Coursera and edX compare in assessment and progress tracking?
Which platform best supports rubric-based grading with criteria-level feedback, Canvas or Google Classroom?
How do transcript artifacts and meeting navigation differ between Teams and Google Meet?
What common problem happens when students mix tools, and how do Canvas and Notion reduce it?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Education Learning alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of education learning tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare education learning tools→