GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Facilities Property ServicesTop 10 Best Air Duct Cleaning Reporting Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Air Duct Cleaning Reporting Software tools with ranking criteria, including Housecall Pro, ServiceTitan, and Knowify.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ServiceTitan
Editor pickConfigurable job reporting dashboards built from job tickets, line items, and captured job documentation
Built for duct cleaning operations needing unified job data, documentation, and performance reporting.
Knowify
Editor pickPhoto-driven report generation that embeds field evidence into standardized air duct documentation
Built for air duct teams needing consistent, photo-backed job reports.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates air duct cleaning reporting software across integration depth, with emphasis on API surface, automation workflows, and extensibility through configurable schemas and data models. It also compares admin and governance controls such as RBAC, provisioning options, and audit log coverage to show how each platform handles throughput and reporting consistency for contracting teams.
Housecall Pro Inspect
photo inspectionCaptures before-and-after photos and inspection data tied to appointments and converts findings into customer deliverables for air duct cleaning reports.
Branded inspection report generation from photo and checklist data captured during the visit
Housecall Pro Inspect is distinct because it ties inspection capture to technician workflows for home services, not just static reporting. It supports branded inspection reports with photos and checklists that convert inspection results into shareable documents for customers.
Core capabilities include structured fields for observations, customizable service forms, and repeatable templates for consistent duct cleaning reporting. The reporting output depends on captured job data, so report quality scales with how well technicians follow the configured inspection checklist.
- +Inspection templates support consistent duct cleaning documentation across technicians
- +Photo and checklist capture flows into customer-ready reports
- +Branded reports reduce manual formatting work for office staff
- –Air duct specific reporting is indirect through general home inspection fields
- –Advanced report logic requires careful template setup and maintenance
- –Export and customization options can feel limited for complex compliance formats
Best for: HVAC and duct teams needing branded photo-based reports from mobile inspections
More related reading
ServiceTitan
HVAC CRMManages HVAC and air duct cleaning dispatching, technician checklists, and job reporting tied to work orders and billing.
Configurable job reporting dashboards built from job tickets, line items, and captured job documentation
ServiceTitan stands out for turning service dispatch and job execution data into highly structured reporting for field businesses. It supports duct cleaning workflows through job tickets, technician scheduling, photo and document capture, and configurable templates that feed customer-facing deliverables.
Reporting can be segmented by job status, technician, location, and service outcomes, which helps track operational performance and quality. The strongest fit is duct cleaning teams that already run ServiceTitan for estimating, scheduling, and field work, then want reporting to unify metrics and compliance artifacts.
- +Job ticket data flows directly into reporting without duplicate entry
- +Configurable report views support technician, location, and status breakdowns
- +Photo and document capture strengthens duct cleaning documentation outputs
- +Work order history supports trend reporting on service outcomes
- –Report setup can feel heavy without strong admin configuration
- –Custom reporting requires process discipline across fields and forms
- –Air duct specific reporting depends on how workflows are configured
- –Role and permission management can add friction during early rollout
Duct cleaning owners and operations managers
Monthly performance and compliance reporting across multiple crews using existing job tickets and technician assignments
Consistent monthly KPIs and audit-ready job documentation across all crews.
Quality assurance managers for duct cleaning franchises
QA scorecards that standardize photo and documentation requirements per job type
Fewer documentation gaps and faster identification of recurring quality issues.
Show 2 more scenarios
Regional dispatch and scheduling leads
Reporting that ties dispatch history and technician scheduling to duct cleaning results
Better crew utilization decisions driven by actual duct cleaning outcomes.
ServiceTitan can segment reports by technician and location while reflecting job completion status and outcomes. This links how scheduling decisions map to job throughput and service quality.
Field supervisors handling customer escalations
Case reports for specific jobs that bundle job details, captured media, and final service outcomes
Quicker resolution of customer disputes with a complete evidence package.
ServiceTitan consolidates job records so supervisors can generate a single view for each duct cleaning appointment. The report can include technician, job status, and attached photos and documents gathered during the visit.
Best for: Duct cleaning operations needing unified job data, documentation, and performance reporting
Knowify
inspection reportingCreates mobile inspection workflows for technicians and produces structured customer reports from captured findings during air duct cleanings.
Photo-driven report generation that embeds field evidence into standardized air duct documentation
Knowify focuses on turning air duct cleaning job data into structured customer-facing reports with reusable templates and consistent documentation. The tool supports recurring work items, technician notes, and photo-driven evidence so each service visit results in a complete deliverable.
Reporting is designed to match field workflows through quick capture of measurements, issues, and recommendations. Export and share options help transform collected job details into a standardized report output.
- +Template-based air duct reports standardize findings across technicians
- +Photo and notes capture creates evidence-rich documentation per job
- +Reusable line items reduce repeated data entry during follow-ups
- +Exportable report output supports customer review and signoff
- –Limited reporting customization depth for highly branded documentation
- –Advanced workflow automation is weaker than dedicated operations platforms
- –Field data structure can feel rigid for unusual inspection formats
Operations managers at mid-sized air duct cleaning companies
Generating consistent customer reports for every service visit across multiple technicians
A uniform report package for audits, disputes, and repeat service scheduling with fewer manual formatting steps.
Field technicians doing duct cleaning and inspection work
Capturing measurements, findings, and photo evidence during the visit and producing the final paperwork
Faster completion of accurate deliverables immediately after the job with less back-and-forth for missing details.
Show 2 more scenarios
Customer support and account coordinators handling service follow-ups
Sending standardized reports to customers after recurring maintenance or re-cleaning appointments
More consistent customer communication across repeat visits with clearer documentation of what changed since the last service.
Knowify supports recurring work items so follow-up visits can reuse the same reporting structure. Coordinators can share the completed deliverable without re-assembling job notes.
Home service owners who need documentation for compliance and risk reduction
Documenting technician notes and evidence for situations that require explanation or escalation
Clearer written records that reduce ambiguity during customer questions and internal review.
Knowify organizes job documentation so technician notes, issues, and recommendations remain attached to the service record. Photo evidence strengthens the narrative in the final customer-facing output.
Best for: Air duct teams needing consistent, photo-backed job reports
More related reading
Jobber
SMB field serviceRuns air duct cleaning estimates, scheduling, and recurring service workflows while supporting technician checklists and job documentation for reporting.
Job-specific notes and attachments that keep reporting artifacts linked to each scheduled job
Jobber stands out with purpose-built job management for service businesses, including scheduling, client communication, and field-ready workflows. For air duct cleaning reporting, it supports branded customer estimates, invoices, and job notes tied to specific jobs. It also provides reporting views for revenue and job status, which helps track throughput and completion performance across crews.
- +Job-centric reporting ties invoices, notes, and status to each service visit
- +Scheduling and dispatch tools reduce manual coordination across repeat air duct jobs
- +Client-facing templates for estimates and invoices speed reporting package creation
- +Automated reminders improve job completion rates that feed cleaner performance reporting
- –Air-duct-specific reporting fields require customization work
- –Limited native support for attaching inspection images beyond standard job documentation
Best for: Service contractors needing job-based reporting and streamlined customer documentation
Kickserv
job managementTracks residential job details, technician tasks, and customer communications while supporting job reporting needs for air duct cleaning work.
Photo and checklist driven job reports for technician field capture
Kickserv focuses on generating polished job reports for air duct cleaning work using repeatable checklists and photo attachments. It supports customer-facing documentation workflows that help technicians capture results and move work into structured records. Reporting output is built around compliance-oriented evidence like findings, measurements, and before and after visuals.
- +Job report templates align tightly with air duct cleaning evidence needs
- +Photo-driven documentation makes before and after reporting straightforward
- +Checklists reduce missed steps during field data capture
- +Structured outputs speed handoff from technicians to office staff
- –Limited flexibility for fully custom report layouts
- –Advanced reporting views require more configuration than basic teams want
- –Workflow setup can feel heavy for single-location operations
Best for: Air duct cleaning teams standardizing photo-based job reports across crews
ZenMaid
home servicesCentralizes service delivery for home maintenance work with customizable job forms and job notes that can be used to produce air duct cleaning reports.
Job-specific report generation that combines technician notes with attached photos
ZenMaid stands out for turning air duct cleaning job details into structured inspection and customer deliverables with consistent reporting. The system supports technician intake, photo and document capture, and report generation tied to each service visit.
It also focuses on operational clarity by organizing work information per job so crews can complete the paperwork alongside the job workflow. Reporting output is designed to be reusable for recurring service types and follow-up estimates.
- +Job-based reporting keeps inspections, photos, and customer deliverables linked
- +Structured technician input reduces missing details in duct cleaning writeups
- +Report outputs are designed for repeatable service types and follow-ups
- +Photo attachment workflow supports evidence-based customer communication
- –Reporting customization is less flexible than general CRM plus document tools
- –Advanced multi-location analytics require extra setup and careful data hygiene
- –Some duct-specific fields can feel rigid for atypical inspection processes
Best for: Duct cleaning teams needing consistent photo-based job reporting and paperwork
More related reading
simPRO
operations suiteSupports technician job costing, work orders, and reporting with configurable checklists for property-service tasks like air duct cleaning.
Custom job templates with configurable fields that drive report-ready service data
simPRO stands out for end-to-end job management built for service businesses that need reporting across scheduling, work, and invoicing. It supports technician workflows, customizable job templates, and structured data capture that can power consistent air duct cleaning reports.
Reporting is tied to operational records like jobs, tickets, and service documentation rather than detached spreadsheets. The platform’s breadth can feel heavier than duct-only tools when teams want simple exportable cleaning summaries.
- +Structured job and work order records produce consistent duct cleaning reports
- +Custom fields and templates support client-specific reporting formats
- +Built-in reporting ties summaries to operational data like tickets and invoices
- +Automated workflows reduce manual status updates during service delivery
- –Air-duct reporting setup can require configuring templates and fields
- –Reporting customization can be slower for complex, one-off report layouts
- –Workflow breadth can add complexity for small duct-only operations
Best for: Service providers needing configurable reporting tied to operational job records
Housecall Pro Inspect
photo inspectionCaptures before-and-after photos and inspection data tied to appointments and converts findings into customer deliverables for air duct cleaning reports.
Branded inspection report generation from photo and checklist data captured during the visit
Housecall Pro Inspect is distinct because it ties inspection capture to technician workflows for home services, not just static reporting. It supports branded inspection reports with photos and checklists that convert inspection results into shareable documents for customers.
Core capabilities include structured fields for observations, customizable service forms, and repeatable templates for consistent duct cleaning reporting. The reporting output depends on captured job data, so report quality scales with how well technicians follow the configured inspection checklist.
- +Inspection templates support consistent duct cleaning documentation across technicians
- +Photo and checklist capture flows into customer-ready reports
- +Branded reports reduce manual formatting work for office staff
- –Air duct specific reporting is indirect through general home inspection fields
- –Advanced report logic requires careful template setup and maintenance
- –Export and customization options can feel limited for complex compliance formats
Best for: HVAC and duct teams needing branded photo-based reports from mobile inspections
More related reading
Buildots
digital reportingAutomates construction progress documentation and defect reporting workflows that can be adapted for property reporting around HVAC and air duct work.
Computer-vision progress analysis from field camera capture to produce structured reporting evidence
Buildots stands out for turning on-site capture into measurable construction deliverables using its computer-vision workflows. It supports automated progress reporting through camera-based documentation, which can translate into consistent reporting packages for trades like air duct cleaning.
Teams can generate structured outputs for tasks and evidence, then share them with stakeholders as jobs move through inspection stages. For duct work, it is most effective when the workflow can be aligned to repeatable capture points and photo-driven verification.
- +Computer-vision capture enables consistent, evidence-based reporting for field work
- +Structured progress outputs help standardize documentation across crews
- +Task evidence can be organized for stakeholder review and audit trails
- +Repeatable capture workflows reduce variation in photo documentation quality
- –Air duct cleaning reporting depends on mapping duct-specific capture points
- –Setup and workflow alignment require effort to match a reporting template
- –More advanced customization can feel constrained by its guided capture model
Best for: Air duct cleaning teams needing evidence-driven job reporting from site photos
GoCanvas
custom formsBuilds mobile forms and inspection templates that generate structured reports from technician-collected air duct cleaning measurements.
Offline-capable mobile form capture with photo attachments and automated submission
GoCanvas stands out with its mobile-first form and workflow builder for field data capture. It supports creating inspection-style reports, attaching photos, and routing completed work for review and recordkeeping.
For air duct cleaning teams, it helps standardize job checklists, document conditions, and generate consistent client-facing outputs from captured site evidence. Its reporting strength depends on how well workflows, form logic, and integrations match local duct-cleaning documentation needs.
- +Mobile forms capture job details and photos in the field
- +Workflow routing sends completed reports to the right reviewers
- +Reusable templates standardize duct cleaning checklists across crews
- +Offline capture supports work in low-connectivity job sites
- –Advanced reporting often requires building custom form logic
- –Client report formatting can feel rigid without additional design effort
- –Air-duct-specific workflows need careful configuration to stay consistent
Best for: Air duct cleaning teams standardizing field reporting with mobile workflows
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 facilities property services, Housecall Pro Inspect stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Air Duct Cleaning Reporting Software
This buyer's guide covers air duct cleaning reporting software and maps real workflow needs to specific tools including Housecall Pro, ServiceTitan, and Knowify. It also compares Jobber, Kickserv, ZenMaid, simPRO, Housecall Pro Inspect, Buildots, and GoCanvas for inspection capture, job documentation, and customer-ready deliverables.
Evaluation focuses on integration depth, the underlying data model used for reporting, automation and API surface for moving data between systems, and admin and governance controls for multi-user operations.
Air duct cleaning reporting software that turns technician capture into evidence-backed customer deliverables
Air duct cleaning reporting software captures inspection findings and photo evidence in field workflows and converts that job data into customer-ready documents, checklists, and signoff packages. It also links reporting artifacts to operational records like work orders, tickets, and invoices so teams can track throughput and job outcomes without re-keying.
Tools like ServiceTitan emphasize duct cleaning reporting built from job tickets, line items, and captured documentation, while Knowify emphasizes photo-driven evidence embedded into standardized duct reports. The typical users include duct cleaning contractors, HVAC teams running mobile inspections, and operations managers who need consistent documentation across crews.
Integration, data modeling, automation surface, and governance controls for duct report delivery
Report quality depends on whether field inputs land in a structured data model that can feed dashboards, exports, and branded customer deliverables. It also depends on whether automation can move completed inspection data through review, approval, and delivery steps without manual copy and paste.
Integration depth and admin controls matter because duct cleaning workflows often touch scheduling, billing, CRM, and compliance artifacts. ServiceTitan and simPRO keep reporting tied to operational records like tickets and invoices, while Housecall Pro Inspect and Housecall Pro focus on branded inspection output generated directly from captured photo and checklist data.
Job-ticket or appointment-linked reporting objects
ServiceTitan ties photo and document capture to job tickets and supports configurable report views by job status, technician, location, and outcomes. simPRO similarly anchors reporting to jobs, work orders, and invoices through structured templates and configurable fields.
Branded customer deliverables generated from photo and checklist capture
Housecall Pro and Housecall Pro Inspect generate branded inspection reports from photo and checklist data captured during the visit. Knowify and ZenMaid also produce structured customer reports that embed field evidence using template-driven line items and attached photos.
Configurable reporting dashboards and operational performance views
ServiceTitan builds configurable job reporting dashboards from job tickets, line items, and captured documentation so duct teams can segment reporting by operational signals. Jobber provides revenue and job-status reporting views that keep notes, invoices, and status tied to each service visit.
Workflow automation and routing for review and completion
GoCanvas routes completed reports to the right reviewers based on workflow routing tied to mobile form submission. Kickserv reduces missed steps by using checklists that structure technician field capture before handoff to office staff.
Template and schema discipline for consistent evidence fields
Housecall Pro templates and recurring service types create repeatable inspection and reporting outputs that scale with configured checklists. Knowify template-based air duct reports standardize findings across technicians and rely on reusable line items for consistent documentation.
Admin and governance controls for permissions and controlled review steps
simPRO includes role-based access that supports controlled review and approval steps tied to operational workflows. ServiceTitan notes that role and permission management can add friction during rollout, which makes early governance planning a core implementation concern.
Choose duct report software by aligning the reporting object to the operational system of record
The fastest way to get consistent air duct documentation is to pick a tool where the reporting deliverable is generated from the same structured job data used for dispatch and billing. ServiceTitan and simPRO excel when the organization already runs operations through work orders, tickets, and invoices that must feed reporting.
Then validate that technician capture supports the exact evidence needs, including photo attachments, before-and-after visuals, and checklist fields. Housecall Pro Inspect, Knowify, ZenMaid, Kickserv, and Jobber all emphasize template-driven reporting outputs grounded in technician field capture.
Map the reporting deliverable to the system record that owns job status
If job status and outcomes already live in dispatch and billing workflows, choose ServiceTitan or simPRO because reporting is built from job tickets, line items, and operational records. If the main requirement is appointment-linked capture into customer documents, Housecall Pro Inspect or GoCanvas can keep inspection data tied to appointments and routed for review.
Define the duct evidence schema before selecting templates
Pick a tool that can enforce structured observation fields and photo-backed evidence using checklists and templates, because report quality scales with technician adherence to configured inspection steps. Housecall Pro and Kickserv use inspection templates and checklists that standardize technician field capture and reduce manual formatting for office staff.
Validate how dashboarding and segmentation will work with your process
If operational reporting requires segmentation by technician, location, and job status, ServiceTitan provides configurable report views built from job data. If revenue and completion tracking tied to job notes is the priority, Jobber’s job-centric reporting keeps invoices, notes, and job status linked.
Assess automation and routing needs for approvals and handoff
Choose GoCanvas for workflow routing of completed reports to the right reviewers after mobile submission. Choose ServiceTitan or simPRO when automation must reduce manual status updates during service delivery and keep reporting artifacts aligned to operational workflow stages.
Stress-test customization for branded compliance formats
Complex branded compliance layouts require careful template setup in Housecall Pro and advanced report logic setup can be maintenance-heavy. If the team expects highly custom report layouts and slower configuration is unacceptable, Knowify and Kickserv can be constrained by limited reporting customization depth, while simPRO supports custom job templates and configurable fields that may take longer to configure.
Confirm offline capture and evidence consistency constraints
If job sites have low connectivity, GoCanvas supports offline capture with photo attachments and automated submission. For camera-driven standardization and evidence capture, Buildots uses computer-vision progress documentation and works best when HVAC and duct capture points can be mapped to repeatable verification steps.
Duct report software audiences by workflow style and evidence requirements
Different duct teams need different reporting mechanics. Some teams need branded customer documents generated directly from technician field capture, while others need reporting dashboards built from work orders and billing records.
The best fit depends on whether the reporting object should be tied to tickets and invoices or primarily to inspection deliverables with photo and checklist evidence.
HVAC and duct teams that need branded photo-based inspection reports from mobile visits
Housecall Pro and Housecall Pro Inspect generate branded inspection reports from photo and checklist data captured during the visit. Knowify and ZenMaid also embed evidence into standardized duct reports using template-based line items and attached photos.
Duct cleaning operations that must unify job data, documentation, and performance reporting
ServiceTitan builds configurable job reporting dashboards from job tickets, line items, and captured documentation and segments reporting by status, technician, location, and outcomes. simPRO anchors reporting to structured job and work order records and supports configurable fields that drive report-ready service data.
Contractors that want job-based reporting artifacts tied to estimates, invoices, and status
Jobber links job notes and attachments to each scheduled job and ties reporting artifacts to invoices and completion tracking. Kickserv standardizes photo and checklist driven job reports so office staff can receive structured outputs for handoff.
Teams standardizing evidence capture using computer-vision or repeatable photo checkpoints
Buildots supports computer-vision progress analysis from field camera capture and is strongest when duct-specific capture points can be mapped to repeatable verification steps. This audience typically needs consistent evidence organization for stakeholder review and audit trails.
Operations that rely on mobile form builders with offline capture and reviewer routing
GoCanvas supports offline-capable mobile forms with photo attachments and routing completed work to the right reviewers. This fit aligns with teams that want flexible form logic while still producing structured inspection-style reports.
Common failure modes when choosing duct cleaning report automation and reporting platforms
A frequent implementation failure is choosing a tool that can display reports but does not enforce the structured data capture used to generate those reports. When technician inputs are not standardized through templates and checklists, customer deliverables become inconsistent across crews.
Another failure mode is overestimating report customization flexibility for branded compliance layouts. Export and customization options can feel limited in Housecall Pro, while highly custom layouts can require slower configuration in simPRO and careful workflow setup in ServiceTitan.
Building duct reporting on generic inspection fields instead of duct-specific templates
Housecall Pro and Housecall Pro Inspect generate branded outputs from captured checklist data, but duct specificity is indirect when ducts are forced into general home inspection fields. Use tools like Knowify or Kickserv when the goal is standardized duct documentation with duct-oriented reporting templates and evidence capture.
Underestimating template and workflow maintenance costs
Advanced report logic in Housecall Pro can require careful template setup and ongoing maintenance as inspection checklists evolve. ServiceTitan report setup can feel heavy without strong admin configuration, so governance and configuration planning must happen before field rollout.
Expecting advanced branded customization without process discipline
Knowify can feel constrained for highly branded documentation when reporting customization depth is required. simPRO supports configurable fields and custom job templates, but complex one-off report layouts can require more time and process discipline to implement.
Ignoring evidence routing and review steps that prevent inconsistent approvals
GoCanvas can route completed reports to the right reviewers, which reduces handoff ambiguity. Without routing and review controls, photo-backed job reports can reach customers with missing observations or incomplete evidence packages.
Using photo capture workflows that cannot map to repeatable capture points
Buildots relies on computer-vision progress documentation, and duct reporting depends on aligning the capture workflow to mapped evidence checkpoints. If capture points cannot be standardized, choose template-driven capture tools like ZenMaid, Jobber, or Kickserv that reduce dependence on advanced camera capture mapping.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Housecall Pro, ServiceTitan, Knowify, and the remaining tools by scoring features, ease of use, and value based on the provided product capabilities and described strengths. The overall ranking used a weighted average where features carried the most weight at 40 percent, while ease of use and value each counted for 30 percent. This scoring reflects how often duct reporting outcomes depend on the structured reporting data model, how much admin configuration is needed to make field capture generate consistent deliverables, and how much friction shows up in real deployment behavior.
Housecall Pro stood out in this set due to branded inspection report generation from photo and checklist data captured during the visit, which lifted it through the features emphasis on evidence-based reporting output generated directly from technician workflows. That same tight coupling between capture and deliverables also supported the usability factor because teams do not need separate detached reporting steps to produce customer-ready documents.
Frequently Asked Questions About Air Duct Cleaning Reporting Software
How do Housecall Pro, Housecall Pro Inspect, and Knowify differ in what triggers report generation?
Which tool best unifies duct-cleaning reporting across scheduling, job execution, and job status metrics?
What is the key difference between template-driven reporting in ServiceTitan and data-model-driven reporting in Knowify?
How do Kickserv, ZenMaid, and GoCanvas handle photo evidence in duct-cleaning reports?
Which platform is better suited for admins who need role-based access controls and audit visibility for reporting changes?
What integration and automation patterns work best for duct-cleaning reporting workflows?
How does data migration typically impact report consistency when moving from spreadsheets into structured reporting tools?
Which tool supports offline or field conditions where connectivity affects report completion?
When should Air Duct Cleaning teams consider computer-vision or evidence automation instead of manual checklist reporting?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Facilities Property Services alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of facilities property services tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare facilities property services tools→