Key Takeaways
- The National Television Violence Study (1994-1998) found that 60% of TV programs contained violence
- In 1995, 57% of TV shows had violence as a primary theme according to NTVS
- NTVS reported that children's programming had the highest violence rate at 69% in 1996
- Average child sees 8,000 murders on TV by age 11 (AAP 2001)
- By age 18, youth witness 200,000 violent acts on TV (AAP)
- US children view 3-4 hours TV daily (Nielsen 2019)
- Violent TV linked to immediate aggression in 80% of studies (meta-analysis)
- Lab experiments show 70% arousal increase post-violent TV (Bushman)
- Children mimic TV violence within minutes in 50% cases (Bandura)
- Longitudinal studies show 22% aggression variance from TV violence (Anderson 2010 meta)
- Habitual violent TV viewing predicts 12% increase in adult aggression (Huesmann 2003)
- Meta-analysis: r=0.15 correlation with antisocial behavior (Paik 1987)
- V-chip mandated by FCC 2000, used by 40% parents (2005)
- TV ratings system covers 98% programs since 1997 (MPAA)
- Children's TV Act 1990 reduced commercial time 20%
Studies consistently link TV violence to increased aggression in both children and adults.
Children’s Exposure
- Average child sees 8,000 murders on TV by age 11 (AAP 2001)
- By age 18, youth witness 200,000 violent acts on TV (AAP)
- US children view 3-4 hours TV daily (Nielsen 2019)
- 70% of 8-18 year olds have TV in bedroom (Kaiser 2010)
- Preschoolers exposed to 2 hours violence daily (2007 study)
- 97% of kids play violent video games but TV similar (APA)
- Black youth watch 4.5 hours TV daily vs 3.5 white (Kaiser)
- 65% of programs kids watch contain violence (Kaiser 2001)
- Teens exposed to 15,000 violent acts yearly on TV (NIJ)
- 80% of top kids shows have violence (Common Sense Media 2020)
- Children 2-7 watch 25 min violence/hour (2009 study)
- Girls exposed to 2.6 hours TV/day age 8-18 (Kaiser 2005)
- 90% zero-6 year olds watch TV weekly (Rideout 2003)
- Heavy viewers (5+hrs) 43% of 2-7 yr olds (Nielsen)
- Latino kids watch 5.1 hours/day (Kaiser 2011)
- 56% kids shows watched have violence (2008 Common Sense)
- Infants 0-2: 25% TV time violent content (2006)
- 12-17 yr olds: 7.5 hours media/day incl TV (Kaiser 2009)
- Low-income kids 4.4 hours TV/day (Rideout 2013)
- 75% parents unaware of violence in kids shows
- Boys watch 1 hour more violent TV than girls (2004)
Children’s Exposure Interpretation
Content Analysis
- The National Television Violence Study (1994-1998) found that 60% of TV programs contained violence
- In 1995, 57% of TV shows had violence as a primary theme according to NTVS
- NTVS reported that children's programming had the highest violence rate at 69% in 1996
- 64% of violent scenes on TV involved no remorse or punishment per NTVS 1997
- Violence occurred at a rate of 5.2 acts per hour on primetime TV (NTVS 1998)
- 84% of violent acts on TV showed no negative consequences (NTVS average)
- Cartoons contained 10.6 violent incidents per hour (NTVS)
- Premium cable had 85% violence rate (NTVS 1995)
- 73% of top-grossing movies PG-13 rated had violence (2013 study)
- 91% of top 100 video games included violence (2011 APA)
- TV violence depictions increased 75% from 1950s to 1990s (Huston et al.)
- 40% of TV violence involved handguns (NTVS)
- Reality TV shows had 62% violence content (2009 study)
- News programs contained 1.8 violent acts per hour (NTVS)
- Soap operas had 53% violence prevalence (NTVS)
- 78% of violent TV characters were attractive (NTVS)
- Music videos had 15 violent acts per hour (1998 study)
- 55% of TV violence was realistic (NTVS 1997)
- Sports broadcasts had 0.3 violent acts per hour (NTVS)
- 67% of children's shows rewarded violence (2001 study)
- NTVS led to 15% industry self-regulation (1999)
- 71% of animated kids shows had violence (2000 study)
- Talk shows had 58% violence (NTVS 1995)
- 4.1 violent acts/hour in kids primetime (NTVS)
- 76% violent programs had attractive perpetrators (NTVS)
- Fantasy violence 23% of total (NTVS 1998)
Content Analysis Interpretation
Interventions/Policy
- V-chip mandated by FCC 2000, used by 40% parents (2005)
- TV ratings system covers 98% programs since 1997 (MPAA)
- Children's TV Act 1990 reduced commercial time 20%
- EU Audiovisual Directive limits violence in kids shows (2010)
- Surgeon General 2001 warned of TV violence risks
- AAP recommends <2 hours screen time/day (1999 policy)
- 35% drop in violent content post-1997 ratings (Kunkel study)
- CARU guidelines reduced violence ads 50% (1990s)
- FCC fines for violence: $550K MTV 2004
- 60% parents use ratings to choose shows (Nielsen 2015)
- Media literacy programs reduce aggression 25% (Scharrer 2006)
- UK watershed rule: violence post-9pm, compliance 95%
- PTV Act 2005: 75% educational content for kids
- 45% violence reduction in kids programming post-CARU (2000)
- WHO guidelines: no violence for under-7s (2011)
- FCC 2011 review: ratings effective 50% violence drop kids TV
- 25% parents use blocking tech (Pew 2011)
- Canada classification: 70% compliance violence watershed
- AAP policy 2016: zero tolerance violence under 2
Interventions/Policy Interpretation
Long-term Effects
- Longitudinal studies show 22% aggression variance from TV violence (Anderson 2010 meta)
- Habitual violent TV viewing predicts 12% increase in adult aggression (Huesmann 2003)
- Meta-analysis: r=0.15 correlation with antisocial behavior (Paik 1987)
- 10-year study: childhood TV violence predicts adult crime (Johnson 2002)
- Desensitization persists: 18% less empathy long-term (Funk)
- Violent TV linked to 9% bullying increase (Harvard 2008)
- 15-year follow-up: aggression doubled in high-exposure group (Huesmann 1984)
- Meta-analysis of 136 studies: small but significant long-term effect (Bushman 2010)
- TV violence accounts for 5-15% youth violence variance (APA)
- Criminal violence up 1% per violent TV hour/week (Grogger)
- Spousal abuse linked to 8% from media habits (Yancey)
- 27% of aggressive adults had high childhood TV violence exposure (Eron)
- Traffic aggression (road rage) correlates r=0.21 with TV violence (Scherer)
- Long-term viewing predicts 13% higher delinquency (Anderson 2007)
- 22-year study: 40% aggression persistence (Huesmann 2010)
- TV violence predicts 11% variance in peer nomination aggression
- Wife abuse correlates 0.25 with media violence (Gelles)
- 16% increase in violent crime from 1970s TV boom (correlational)
- Antisocial personality disorder odds ratio 1.5 (Ferguson critique but orig)
- Meta-analysis 431 effect sizes r=0.198 (Greitemeyer 2019)
- Sexual violence acceptance up 10% long-term (Check)
- 5% population attributable risk for violence (DHHS)
- Domestic violence recidivism linked to TV habits 7% (WHO)
- 30-year cohort: r=0.31 aggression (Lefkowitz)
- Japan low TV violence, low youth crime comparative
Long-term Effects Interpretation
Short-term Effects
- Violent TV linked to immediate aggression in 80% of studies (meta-analysis)
- Lab experiments show 70% arousal increase post-violent TV (Bushman)
- Children mimic TV violence within minutes in 50% cases (Bandura)
- Violent clips increase aggressive thoughts by 30% (Anderson 2003)
- Desensitization to violence after viewing: 40% less empathy (Thomas)
- Priming effect: violent TV boosts hostility 25% (Bushman 2002)
- Fear of victimization up 20% after violent news (meta)
- Physiological arousal (heart rate) rises 15% post-violent TV
- 90% of field studies show short-term aggression link (APA task force)
- Stereotyping increases 35% after violent portrayals (Dill)
- Appetite for violence content up 22% after exposure (Zillmann)
- Aggressive behavior in play rises 28% post-viewing (Paik meta)
- Mean world syndrome: 10-15% more fear (Gerbner)
- 65% of experimental studies confirm aggression (Bushman meta 2009)
- Violent TV reduces helping behavior by 20% (Hearold)
- Immediate physiological desensitization in 75% youth (Cline)
- Violent TV increases heart rate 12 bpm short-term (1980s study)
- 217 studies: 66% show aggression link (Hearold 1986)
- Post-viewing hostility up 18% (Carlson 1989)
- Fear reactions in 40% children after violent cartoons
- Imitation of specific acts: 25% rate (Bandura follow-ups)
- 50+ lab studies confirm priming effect (Anderson)
- Reduced prosocial behavior 15-20% (Mares meta)
- Anxiety from violence: 28% kids affected (Cantor)
- Stereotype endorsement up 27% (Bushman 2007)
- Appetite suppression for real violence post-TV (Fenigstein)
- 80% immediate effect in correlational designs adjusted
- Meta r=0.22 for short-term aggression (Bushman 2006)
Short-term Effects Interpretation
Sources & References
- Reference 1STATEOFMEDIAstateofmedia.orgVisit source
- Reference 2CENTERFORSCREEN-TIMEcenterforscreen-time.orgVisit source
- Reference 3APAapa.orgVisit source
- Reference 4MEDIASMARTSmediasmarts.caVisit source
- Reference 5ERICeric.ed.govVisit source
- Reference 6ANNENBERGPUBLICPOLICYCENTERannenbergpublicpolicycenter.orgVisit source
- Reference 7PSYCNETpsycnet.apa.orgVisit source
- Reference 8MEDIALITmedialit.orgVisit source
- Reference 9NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 10AAPaap.orgVisit source
- Reference 11PUBLICATIONSpublications.aap.orgVisit source
- Reference 12NIELSENnielsen.comVisit source
- Reference 13KFFkff.orgVisit source
- Reference 14PEDIATRICSpediatrics.aappublications.orgVisit source
- Reference 15JHSPHjhsph.eduVisit source
- Reference 16NIJnij.ojp.govVisit source
- Reference 17COMMONSENSEMEDIAcommonsensemedia.orgVisit source
- Reference 18ONLINELIBRARYonlinelibrary.wiley.comVisit source
- Reference 19ANNann.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 20JSTORjstor.orgVisit source
- Reference 21SCIENCEscience.orgVisit source
- Reference 22HEALTHhealth.harvard.eduVisit source
- Reference 23NBERnber.orgVisit source
- Reference 24FCCfcc.govVisit source
- Reference 25FILMRATINGSfilmratings.comVisit source
- Reference 26EUR-LEXeur-lex.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 27BBBPROGRAMSbbbprograms.orgVisit source
- Reference 28OFCOMofcom.org.ukVisit source
- Reference 29FTCftc.govVisit source
- Reference 30WHOwho.intVisit source
- Reference 31FILESfiles.eric.ed.govVisit source
- Reference 32UNODCunodc.orgVisit source
- Reference 33PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 34CRTCcrtc.gc.caVisit source






