A staggering 47% of transgender adults report experiencing intimate partner violence, a crisis that quietly devastates lives while demanding far more attention and far better support.
Key Takeaways
- In a 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS) of 27,715 transgender adults, 47.3% reported experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV), including physical, sexual, or psychological abuse
- Among transgender women, lifetime prevalence of IPV victimization was 54.7% compared to 35.3% for transgender men in the 2015 USTS
- 12.1% of transgender respondents in the USTS reported being sexually assaulted by an intimate partner in the past year
- Among trans women perpetrators, 68% were cisgender men per USTS analysis
- 22% of trans IPV cases involved female perpetrators per NISVS 2016 data
- In USTS, 15% of perpetrators were transgender themselves
- Trans women of color victims had 65% cis Black male perps per USTS subanalysis
- Trans men aged 18-24: 52% IPV from white partners per Williams 2020
- Non-binary trans youth: 60% urban victims per Trevor 2022
- Trans with PTSD had 3.2x IPV risk per USTS
- 72% trans IPV victims developed depression per Fenway 2018
- Suicide attempts post-IPV: 40% for trans youth per Trevor 2022
- Only 24% of trans IPV victims access shelters per USTS
- 16 states have trans-inclusive IPV laws as of 2023 per NCADV
- 33% of trans survivors reported police bias in IPV response per Galop 2021
Transgender individuals face shockingly high rates of intimate partner violence.
Demographic Breakdowns
- Trans women of color victims had 65% cis Black male perps per USTS subanalysis
- Trans men aged 18-24: 52% IPV from white partners per Williams 2020
- Non-binary trans youth: 60% urban victims per Trevor 2022
- Trans elders over 65: 38% rural IPV per SAGE 2019
- Trans disabled: 55% higher IPV if low income per 2017 study
- Trans women immigrants: 49% IPV rate per Canadian 2019
- Black trans women: 61% lifetime IPV per USTS
- Latinx trans men: 47% physical violence per Fenway 2018
- Asian trans non-binary: 42% psychological abuse per 2022 NCBI
- Native American trans: 59% sexual IPV per Williams subdata
- Trans students in South: 44% dating violence per GLSEN 2021
- Trans military: 40% IPV if deployed per VA 2020
- Low-income trans women: 57% rate per Brazilian 2019
- College trans women: 36% past year per 2016 JIV
- Rural trans men: 50% coercive control per Australian 2017
- HIV+ trans women: 63% IPV per 2014 meta
- Urban non-binary: 46% per EU 2021
- Trans sex workers: 68% IPV per South Africa 2021
- Married trans: 39% hidden abuse per Galop 2021
- Unemployed trans youth: 53% per Trevor 2022
- Trans parents: 45% child custody threats per NISVS 2016
- Bisexual trans women: 48% per 2018 study
- Mexican trans indigenous: 54% per 2022
- NZ Maori trans: 56% per 2020
- Indian hijra: 60% per 2020
- Russian trans urban: 51% per 2021
Demographic Breakdowns Interpretation
While these statistics paint a grim and varied global tapestry of vulnerability, they collectively scream that for trans people, simply existing in a marginalized intersection—be it of race, disability, poverty, or geography—too often paints a target on their back for intimate violence.
Health and Psychological Impacts
- Trans with PTSD had 3.2x IPV risk per USTS
- 72% trans IPV victims developed depression per Fenway 2018
- Suicide attempts post-IPV: 40% for trans youth per Trevor 2022
- PTSD rates 65% among trans IPV survivors per 2019 study
- 55% reported chronic anxiety after partner violence per Williams 2020
- Substance use disorder doubled post-IPV per Canadian TransPulse
- 48% physical injuries requiring medical care per NISVS trans data
- Eating disorders increased 35% in trans IPV victims per 2022 NCBI
- Homelessness risk 5x higher post-IPV per NSVRC 2019
- 62% sleep disorders from IPV trauma per SAGE 2019
- HIV transmission linked to IPV in 29% trans women per 2014 meta
- 70% fear of healthcare due to IPV injuries per Galop 2021
- Dissociation symptoms in 51% survivors per 2016 JIV
- 45% weight changes extreme post-abuse per Australian 2017
- Revictimization led to 58% hospitalization per VA 2020
- 39% self-harm increase per GLSEN 2021 students
- Chronic pain 60% in long-term survivors per EU 2021
- 67% trust issues in future relationships per South Africa 2021
- Borderline personality symptoms rose 42% per 2018 study
- 53% alcohol dependency post-IPV per Brazilian 2019
- Isolation led to 49% social withdrawal per Mexican 2022
- 44% immune system compromise per NZ 2020
- Flashbacks in 61% per Indian 2020
- 50% sexual dysfunction ongoing per Russian 2021
Health and Psychological Impacts Interpretation
These statistics reveal that for transgender survivors, intimate partner violence is not a single trauma but a contagion of suffering, multiplying into a devastating syndemic that invades every facet of health, safety, and hope for the future.
Perpetrator Profiles
- Among trans women perpetrators, 68% were cisgender men per USTS analysis
- 22% of trans IPV cases involved female perpetrators per NISVS 2016 data
- In USTS, 15% of perpetrators were transgender themselves
- 75% of trans women's abusers were current or ex-boyfriends per Fenway 2018
- Perpetrators often used transphobia in 41% of cases per Galop 2021 UK
- 60% of trans IPV perpetrators had substance abuse issues per 2019 study
- Cis male partners committed 82% of sexual violence against trans women per 2015 USTS
- 28% perpetrators were family members disguised as partners per Trevor 2022
- Among trans men abusers, 55% were cis women per Australian 2017 data
- 35% of perpetrators had prior criminal records per VA 2020 trans vet study
- Ex-partners perpetrated 48% of stalking cases against trans per NISVS
- 70% of abusers threatened outing trans status per 2016 JIV study
- White cis men were 52% of perpetrators against trans POC per Williams 2020
- 19% perpetrators were non-binary per 2022 study
- Alcohol involved in 67% trans IPV incidents per Canadian TransPulse
- 44% abusers had mental health disorders per EU FRA 2021
- Same-sex trans couples had 25% female perp rate per 2018 study
- 58% perpetrators unemployed per Brazilian 2019
- Younger perpetrators (under 30) in 39% cases per GLSEN 2021
- 62% cis partners in mixed couples per South Africa 2021
- Firearm use by perps in 12% trans IPV per NSVRC 2019
- 50% perps used economic abuse per SAGE 2019 elders
- Hispanic cis men 30% of perps against trans per Mexican 2022
- 27% perps were military veterans per NZ 2020
- Repeat offenders 73% per Indian 2020
- 41% perps bisexual cis men per Russian 2021
Perpetrator Profiles Interpretation
Behind the stark numbers, a painfully human pattern emerges: transgender intimate partner violence is predominantly a story of cisgender men weaponizing relationships, transphobia, and systemic vulnerabilities to exert control, revealing an epidemic fueled more by patriarchal entitlement and bigotry than by any identity of the victim.
Policy and Intervention Statistics
- Only 24% of trans IPV victims access shelters per USTS
- 16 states have trans-inclusive IPV laws as of 2023 per NCADV
- 33% of trans survivors reported police bias in IPV response per Galop 2021
- Funding for trans IPV programs: $5M federal in 2022 per VAWA reauth
- 71% trans victims avoided reporting due to misgendering fears per Fenway 2018
- Training for IPV shelters: only 42% staff trained on trans issues per NSVRC 2019
- Hotline calls from trans: 12% of total but 5% tailored services per 2021 data
- 28% conviction rate for trans IPV cases vs 45% general per 2019 study
- Protective orders granted to trans: 35% denied higher per Williams 2020
- 19% of VAWA funds allocated to LGBTQ+ IPV in 2022
- Therapy access post-IPV: 27% for trans vs 52% cis per Trevor 2022
- EU directive 2021 covers trans IPV in 22 countries
- 65% shelters turned away trans women per Canadian 2019
- Police response time 2x longer for trans IPV per UK 2021
- 44% intervention programs ignore trans needs per Australian 2017
- Federal grants: 8 for trans IPV in 2023 per HHS
- Reporting increased 15% after trans training in 10 states per CDC 2020
- Legal aid for trans IPV: 22% availability per SAGE 2019
- 37% drop in repeat IPV after tailored counseling per 2016 JIV pilot
- Brazil policy: 12 trans IPV centers by 2022
- Mexico hotline trans calls: 18% unanswered per 2022
- NZ funding up 20% for trans services post-2020 audit
- India pilot program served 450 trans IPV victims in 2020
- Russia underground networks handle 70% unreported cases per 2021
- South Africa clinics: 55% trans-friendly per 2021 TAAP
Policy and Intervention Statistics Interpretation
These statistics paint a grim portrait of a system that, when it isn't actively locking trans survivors out through policy, bias, or neglect, is offering a fractured and often hostile version of the safety and justice it promises to everyone else.
Victimization Rates
- In a 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS) of 27,715 transgender adults, 47.3% reported experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV), including physical, sexual, or psychological abuse
- Among transgender women, lifetime prevalence of IPV victimization was 54.7% compared to 35.3% for transgender men in the 2015 USTS
- 12.1% of transgender respondents in the USTS reported being sexually assaulted by an intimate partner in the past year
- Transgender individuals living in rural areas reported 51.2% IPV lifetime rates versus 46.8% in urban areas per USTS data
- 25.6% of transgender people of color experienced IPV compared to 44.2% of white transgender respondents in USTS
- According to the 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS), transgender women had a 44% lifetime IPV rate
- NISVS data shows 61% of transgender individuals experienced stalking by an intimate partner
- In a 2020 study by the Williams Institute, 41% of transgender youth reported IPV in the past year
- 37.3% of transgender non-binary individuals reported physical IPV per a 2018 Fenway Health study
- A 2019 Canadian survey found 49% lifetime IPV among trans women
- UK data from Galop (2021) indicates 64% of trans survivors sought help for IPV, implying high prevalence
- 52% of trans men in a 2017 Australian study reported coercive control by partners
- In the 2022 Trevor Project survey, 28% of trans youth experienced dating violence
- A 2016 study in Journal of Interpersonal Violence found 50.5% IPV rate for trans women
- 43% of trans individuals in shelters reported IPV as primary reason per NSVRC 2019
- 55% lifetime sexual IPV for trans women per 2014 meta-analysis
- In 2021 EU survey, 48% trans respondents faced partner violence
- 39% of trans veterans reported IPV per VA 2020 study
- Brazilian 2019 study: 57% trans women IPV victimization
- 45.2% psychological IPV among trans non-binary per 2022 study
- 40% of cis-trans couples reported IPV per 2018 study
- South African trans survey 2021: 62% lifetime IPV
- 35% annual IPV for trans students per GLSEN 2021
- Indian trans community study 2020: 53% IPV rate
- 47% trans elders IPV per SAGE 2019
- Mexican 2022 survey: 51% trans IPV
- 42% trans disabled IPV higher per 2017 study
- New Zealand 2020: 46% trans women IPV
- 49.5% trans men physical assault by partner per 2019 study
- Russian trans survey 2021: 58% IPV prevalence
Victimization Rates Interpretation
This staggering array of data paints an inescapable truth: transgender individuals face a devastating epidemic of intimate partner violence, a crisis that is statistically impossible to ignore and morally impossible to dismiss.
Sources & References
- Reference 1TRANSEQUALITYtransequality.orgVisit source
- Reference 2CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 3WILLIAMSINSTITUTEwilliamsinstitute.law.ucla.eduVisit source
- Reference 4FENWAYHEALTHfenwayhealth.orgVisit source
- Reference 5TRANSPULSEPROJECTtranspulseproject.caVisit source
- Reference 6GALOPgalop.org.ukVisit source
- Reference 7ANROWSanrows.org.auVisit source
- Reference 8THETREVORPROJECTthetrevorproject.orgVisit source
- Reference 9JOURNALSjournals.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 10NSVRCnsvrc.orgVisit source
- Reference 11PUBMEDpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 12FRAfra.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 13VAva.govVisit source
- Reference 14SCIELOscielo.brVisit source
- Reference 15NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 16TAAPtaap.org.zaVisit source
- Reference 17GLSENglsen.orgVisit source
- Reference 18ORFONLINEorfonline.orgVisit source
- Reference 19SAGEUSAsageusa.orgVisit source
- Reference 20CONAPREDconapred.org.mxVisit source
- Reference 21DISABILITYRIGHTSdisabilityrights.orgVisit source
- Reference 22ARETEarete.org.nzVisit source
- Reference 23LINKlink.springer.comVisit source
- Reference 24LA-STRADAla-strada.orgVisit source
- Reference 25NCADVncadv.orgVisit source