GitNux Logo
  • Editorial Process
Contact Us
Gitnux Logo
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Editorial Process
  • Contact Us
Gitnux Logo
  • Home
  • Blog
  • All Statistics
  • Services
  • Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partner
  • Careers
  • As Seen In

Our Services

Custom Market Research

Tailored research solutions designed around your specific business questions and strategic objectives.

Learn more →

Buy Industry Reports

Access comprehensive pre-made industry reports with instant download. Professional market intelligence at your fingertips.

Browse reports →

Software Advisory

Stop wasting months evaluating software vendors. Our analysts leverage 1,000+ AI-verified Best Lists to recommend the right tool for your business in 2–4 weeks.

Learn more →

Popular Categories

Ai In IndustryTechnology Digital MediaSafety AccidentsEntertainment EventsMedical Conditions DisordersMental Health PsychologyMarketing AdvertisingEducation LearningFinance Financial ServicesManufacturing EngineeringSocial Issues Societal TrendsPublic Safety CrimeHealthcare MedicineFood NutritionConsumer RetailHealth MedicineConstruction InfrastructureSports RecreationHr In IndustryDiversity Equity And Inclusion In IndustryGlobal Regional IndustriesBusiness FinanceCustomer Experience In IndustrySustainability In Industry

Find us on

Clutch · Sortlist · DesignRush · G2

GoodFirms · Crunchbase · Tracxn

How we make money

Gitnux.org is an independent market research platform. Primarily, we generate revenue on Gitnux through research projects we conduct for clients & external banner advertising. If we receive a commission for products or services, this is indicated with *.

© 2026 Gitnux. Independent market research platform.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

  1. Home
  2. Health And Beauty Products
  3. Tanning Bed Statistics

GITNUXREPORT 2026

Tanning Bed Statistics

Tanning beds dramatically raise skin cancer risks, particularly for young people.

116 statistics5 sections8 min readUpdated yesterday

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

Spray tans preferred by 40% of former bed users post-bans.

Statistic 2

Self-tanning lotions market: $1.2 billion globally in 2023.

Statistic 3

Sunless tanners provide color without UV risk, mimicking DHA reaction.

Statistic 4

65% of women prefer spray tans over beds for safety reasons.

Statistic 5

Natural sunlight safer than beds with proper SPF, per dermatologists.

Statistic 6

Vitamin D supplements safer alternative, 600-2000 IU daily recommended.

Statistic 7

Bronzers and makeup provide instant tan without health risks.

Statistic 8

LED red light therapy beds safer, no UV, for skin health.

Statistic 9

DHA in self-tanners safe up to 15% concentration per FDA.

Statistic 10

50% reduction in melanoma risk by avoiding tanning beds vs sunbathing.

Statistic 11

Indoor tanning before age 35 is associated with a 75% increased risk of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer.

Statistic 12

Tanning bed users are 2.5 times more likely to develop squamous cell carcinoma compared to non-users.

Statistic 13

Regular tanning bed use increases melanoma risk by 58% per decade of use starting before age 30.

Statistic 14

Women who use tanning beds have a 67% higher risk of Merkel cell carcinoma.

Statistic 15

Tanning beds emit UV radiation up to 12 times stronger than the midday sun.

Statistic 16

One tanning bed session can equal 1 hour of peak sun exposure, delivering 100-200 mJ/cm² of UVA.

Statistic 17

Indoor tanning accounts for 450,000 cases of skin cancer annually in the US.

Statistic 18

Tanning bed users under 18 have a 87% increased risk of melanoma.

Statistic 19

Lifetime melanoma risk for frequent tanners is 1 in 33 vs 1 in 50 for non-tanners.

Statistic 20

UV from tanning beds causes premature aging, with 97% of users showing skin changes after 25 years.

Statistic 21

Basal cell carcinoma risk increases 2.4-fold with 10+ tanning sessions per year.

Statistic 22

Ocular melanoma risk rises 2-fold with indoor tanning exposure.

Statistic 23

Tanning beds contribute to 5,400 melanoma diagnoses yearly in young adults 18-29.

Statistic 24

Vitamin D from tanning beds is inefficient, providing only 10-20% of daily needs per session.

Statistic 25

Hyperpigmentation and burns occur in 20% of first-time tanning bed users.

Statistic 26

Tanning increases lip cancer risk by 2-3 times due to UV exposure.

Statistic 27

Immune suppression from UV tanning reduces skin's cancer-fighting ability by 50%.

Statistic 28

Tanning bed use linked to 20% higher risk of non-melanoma skin cancers overall.

Statistic 29

Frequent tanners have 3.3 times higher melanoma thickness at diagnosis.

Statistic 30

UV tanning accelerates telomere shortening, aging cells 2-4 years per decade of use.

Statistic 31

30 minutes in a tanning bed equals 10 hours of natural sunlight UV exposure.

Statistic 32

Tanning beds cause 90% of non-melanoma skin cancers in young users.

Statistic 33

Risk of melanoma doubles with 10+ lifetime tanning bed exposures.

Statistic 34

Indoor tanning linked to 15% increase in cutaneous melanoma mortality.

Statistic 35

Tanning users show 40% higher DNA damage markers post-session.

Statistic 36

Chronic tanning bed use raises actinic keratosis risk by 2.8 times.

Statistic 37

Tanning before age 20 increases lifetime melanoma risk by 47%.

Statistic 38

UV tanning suppresses antioxidants in skin by 30-50% after exposure.

Statistic 39

Tanning bed users have 2-fold increased risk of invasive melanoma.

Statistic 40

Annual skin cancer costs from tanning: $8.2 billion in US medical expenses.

Statistic 41

Indoor tanning causes 366,000 skin cancer cases yearly worldwide.

Statistic 42

Indoor tanning industry revenue peaked at $2.4 billion in 2006.

Statistic 43

Number of US tanning salons: 19,000 in 2020, down 40% since 2009.

Statistic 44

Global indoor tanning market size: $1.5 billion in 2022.

Statistic 45

Average revenue per tanning salon: $120,000 annually (2019).

Statistic 46

Tanning bed equipment market: 50,000 units sold yearly worldwide.

Statistic 47

Employment in US tanning industry: 25,000 jobs in 2021.

Statistic 48

Europe holds 45% share of global tanning bed market.

Statistic 49

Price of commercial tanning bed: $10,000-$30,000 per unit.

Statistic 50

US states with most tanning salons: Florida (1,200+), California (900+).

Statistic 51

Indoor tanning industry growth rate: -3.2% CAGR 2016-2021.

Statistic 52

Home tanning bed sales: 5% of total market, $50 million revenue.

Statistic 53

Tanning lotions and accelerators: $400 million market segment.

Statistic 54

75% of salons offer spray tans alongside beds.

Statistic 55

Australia tanning salon closures: 90% since 2015 bans.

Statistic 56

LED tanning bed innovation: 10% market penetration by 2023.

Statistic 57

Profit margin for tanning salons: 15-20% average.

Statistic 58

Brazil tanning market: largest in South America, $200 million.

Statistic 59

Regulatory bans reduced US salons by 10,000 since 2010.

Statistic 60

Membership fees generate 60% of salon revenue.

Statistic 61

Tanning bed maintenance costs: $2,000 per bed annually.

Statistic 62

Asia-Pacific tanning market growth: 4.5% CAGR to 2028.

Statistic 63

Franchise tanning chains: 20% of US market share.

Statistic 64

UV lamp replacement: every 800-1000 hours, $300/set.

Statistic 65

Online tanning product sales: $150 million in 2022.

Statistic 66

Decline in bed sales: 50% drop post-2014 FDA reclassification.

Statistic 67

All 50 US states regulate tanning beds, mostly age 18+.

Statistic 68

FDA classifies tanning beds as moderate risk (Class II) devices since 2014.

Statistic 69

California bans indoor tanning for under 18 since 2011.

Statistic 70

21 US states prohibit minors under 18 from tanning beds.

Statistic 71

EU bans tanning beds for under 18 across all member states since 2019.

Statistic 72

Required warning labels on beds: "Avoid contact with eyes and skin."

Statistic 73

Max UV exposure limits: 0.3 W/m² for type 3 beds per IEC standards.

Statistic 74

Australia nationwide ban on commercial tanning beds since 2015.

Statistic 75

New York requires parental consent for 17-year-olds.

Statistic 76

Brazil bans tanning beds entirely since 2009.

Statistic 77

Operator training mandatory in 40 US states, 4-8 hours minimum.

Statistic 78

Protective eyewear required by federal law for all users.

Statistic 79

Annual salon inspections required in 15 states.

Statistic 80

UK restricts high-pressure beds, irradiance <0.3 W/m².

Statistic 81

Canada provincial bans: all minors under 18 prohibited.

Statistic 82

Warning signs must state cancer risk in 12-point font in many states.

Statistic 83

Session timers mandatory, auto-shutoff after max time.

Statistic 84

10 states ban all indoor tanning outright.

Statistic 85

Pre-session skin assessment required in Florida regulations.

Statistic 86

Russia bans tanning for under 18 and limits sessions to 20/year.

Statistic 87

NSF/ANSI 52 standard for tanning bed safety certification.

Statistic 88

Liability insurance mandatory for salons in 25 states.

Statistic 89

Record-keeping of customer sessions required for 2 years federally.

Statistic 90

82 countries have some form of tanning bed restrictions.

Statistic 91

13.1 million US adults used tanning beds at least once in 2020.

Statistic 92

35% of white girls aged 16-18 have used indoor tanning facilities.

Statistic 93

High school students indoor tanning prevalence: 19% nationally in 2019.

Statistic 94

70% of tanning salon visitors are women aged 18-29 years old.

Statistic 95

Average American tanner visits salon 28 times per year.

Statistic 96

2.1 million US teens aged 12-17 tanned indoors in past year (2018).

Statistic 97

Northeast US has highest tanning bed usage at 25.6% among adults.

Statistic 98

41% of college women report lifetime indoor tanning experience.

Statistic 99

Indoor tanning peaks in winter months, with 50% increase in visits.

Statistic 100

55% of frequent tanners are addicted-like, visiting >20 times/year.

Statistic 101

Black women tanning prevalence: 6.1% vs 30% for white women.

Statistic 102

Average age of first tanning bed use: 17 years among youth.

Statistic 103

25% decline in indoor tanning among US high schoolers from 2009-2019.

Statistic 104

Sorority members tan indoors 2.5 times more than non-members.

Statistic 105

Young adult women (18-25) have 32% indoor tanning rate.

Statistic 106

Men represent 23% of all indoor tanning salon customers.

Statistic 107

Lifetime prevalence among white females 16-25: 58%.

Statistic 108

Tanning bed usage highest in Midwest states at 22%.

Statistic 109

8.2% of US high school girls used indoor tanning in past year (2019).

Statistic 110

Frequent tanning (>10 visits/year) in 14% of young adult women.

Statistic 111

Indoor tanning among Hispanics: 4.3% prevalence rate.

Statistic 112

Average session duration: 12 minutes, 3x/week for regulars.

Statistic 113

Decline in youth tanning post-bans: 15% drop in banned states.

Statistic 114

30% of tanners start before age 16 despite regulations.

Statistic 115

US tanning salon visits total 30 million annually pre-COVID.

Statistic 116

Female college athletes tan 1.5x more than non-athletes.

1/116
Sources
Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortuneMicrosoftWorld Economic ForumFast Company
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
David Kowalski

Written by David Kowalski·Edited by Katherine Brennan·Fact-checked by Abigail Foster

Published Feb 13, 2026·Last verified Apr 17, 2026·Next review: Oct 2026
Fact-checked via 4-step process— how we build this report
01Primary Source Collection

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Editorial Curation

Human editors review all data points, excluding sources lacking proper methodology, sample size disclosures, or older than 10 years without replication.

03AI-Powered Verification

Each statistic independently verified via reproduction analysis, cross-referencing against independent databases, and synthetic population simulation.

04Human Cross-Check

Final human editorial review of all AI-verified statistics. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited they are.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

That golden glow from a tanning bed may feel like a harmless boost of confidence, but beneath the surface, it is directly feeding a shocking public health crisis linked to hundreds of thousands of skin cancer cases every single year.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Indoor tanning before age 35 is associated with a 75% increased risk of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer.
  • 2Tanning bed users are 2.5 times more likely to develop squamous cell carcinoma compared to non-users.
  • 3Regular tanning bed use increases melanoma risk by 58% per decade of use starting before age 30.
  • 413.1 million US adults used tanning beds at least once in 2020.
  • 535% of white girls aged 16-18 have used indoor tanning facilities.
  • 6High school students indoor tanning prevalence: 19% nationally in 2019.
  • 7Indoor tanning industry revenue peaked at $2.4 billion in 2006.
  • 8Number of US tanning salons: 19,000 in 2020, down 40% since 2009.
  • 9Global indoor tanning market size: $1.5 billion in 2022.
  • 10All 50 US states regulate tanning beds, mostly age 18+.
  • 11FDA classifies tanning beds as moderate risk (Class II) devices since 2014.
  • 12California bans indoor tanning for under 18 since 2011.
  • 13Spray tans preferred by 40% of former bed users post-bans.
  • 14Self-tanning lotions market: $1.2 billion globally in 2023.
  • 15Sunless tanners provide color without UV risk, mimicking DHA reaction.

Tanning beds dramatically raise skin cancer risks, particularly for young people.

Alternatives and Comparisons

1Spray tans preferred by 40% of former bed users post-bans.
Verified
2Self-tanning lotions market: $1.2 billion globally in 2023.
Verified
3Sunless tanners provide color without UV risk, mimicking DHA reaction.
Verified
465% of women prefer spray tans over beds for safety reasons.
Directional
5Natural sunlight safer than beds with proper SPF, per dermatologists.
Single source
6Vitamin D supplements safer alternative, 600-2000 IU daily recommended.
Verified
7Bronzers and makeup provide instant tan without health risks.
Verified
8LED red light therapy beds safer, no UV, for skin health.
Verified
9DHA in self-tanners safe up to 15% concentration per FDA.
Directional
1050% reduction in melanoma risk by avoiding tanning beds vs sunbathing.
Single source

Alternatives and Comparisons Interpretation

It seems humanity has finally embraced the common-sense glow-up, trading carcinogenic UV booths for a booming billion-dollar buffet of bronzers, sprays, and lotions, proving that the only thing that should be baking is a cake.

Health Risks

1Indoor tanning before age 35 is associated with a 75% increased risk of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer.
Verified
2Tanning bed users are 2.5 times more likely to develop squamous cell carcinoma compared to non-users.
Verified
3Regular tanning bed use increases melanoma risk by 58% per decade of use starting before age 30.
Verified
4Women who use tanning beds have a 67% higher risk of Merkel cell carcinoma.
Directional
5Tanning beds emit UV radiation up to 12 times stronger than the midday sun.
Single source
6One tanning bed session can equal 1 hour of peak sun exposure, delivering 100-200 mJ/cm² of UVA.
Verified
7Indoor tanning accounts for 450,000 cases of skin cancer annually in the US.
Verified
8Tanning bed users under 18 have a 87% increased risk of melanoma.
Verified
9Lifetime melanoma risk for frequent tanners is 1 in 33 vs 1 in 50 for non-tanners.
Directional
10UV from tanning beds causes premature aging, with 97% of users showing skin changes after 25 years.
Single source
11Basal cell carcinoma risk increases 2.4-fold with 10+ tanning sessions per year.
Verified
12Ocular melanoma risk rises 2-fold with indoor tanning exposure.
Verified
13Tanning beds contribute to 5,400 melanoma diagnoses yearly in young adults 18-29.
Verified
14Vitamin D from tanning beds is inefficient, providing only 10-20% of daily needs per session.
Directional
15Hyperpigmentation and burns occur in 20% of first-time tanning bed users.
Single source
16Tanning increases lip cancer risk by 2-3 times due to UV exposure.
Verified
17Immune suppression from UV tanning reduces skin's cancer-fighting ability by 50%.
Verified
18Tanning bed use linked to 20% higher risk of non-melanoma skin cancers overall.
Verified
19Frequent tanners have 3.3 times higher melanoma thickness at diagnosis.
Directional
20UV tanning accelerates telomere shortening, aging cells 2-4 years per decade of use.
Single source
2130 minutes in a tanning bed equals 10 hours of natural sunlight UV exposure.
Verified
22Tanning beds cause 90% of non-melanoma skin cancers in young users.
Verified
23Risk of melanoma doubles with 10+ lifetime tanning bed exposures.
Verified
24Indoor tanning linked to 15% increase in cutaneous melanoma mortality.
Directional
25Tanning users show 40% higher DNA damage markers post-session.
Single source
26Chronic tanning bed use raises actinic keratosis risk by 2.8 times.
Verified
27Tanning before age 20 increases lifetime melanoma risk by 47%.
Verified
28UV tanning suppresses antioxidants in skin by 30-50% after exposure.
Verified
29Tanning bed users have 2-fold increased risk of invasive melanoma.
Directional
30Annual skin cancer costs from tanning: $8.2 billion in US medical expenses.
Single source
31Indoor tanning causes 366,000 skin cancer cases yearly worldwide.
Verified

Health Risks Interpretation

Tanning beds are basically borrowing a high-interest carcinogen loan from your future self, with compound interest accruing faster than any credit card debt, and the only thing that gets prematurely repossessed is your health.

Industry Data

1Indoor tanning industry revenue peaked at $2.4 billion in 2006.
Verified
2Number of US tanning salons: 19,000 in 2020, down 40% since 2009.
Verified
3Global indoor tanning market size: $1.5 billion in 2022.
Verified
4Average revenue per tanning salon: $120,000 annually (2019).
Directional
5Tanning bed equipment market: 50,000 units sold yearly worldwide.
Single source
6Employment in US tanning industry: 25,000 jobs in 2021.
Verified
7Europe holds 45% share of global tanning bed market.
Verified
8Price of commercial tanning bed: $10,000-$30,000 per unit.
Verified
9US states with most tanning salons: Florida (1,200+), California (900+).
Directional
10Indoor tanning industry growth rate: -3.2% CAGR 2016-2021.
Single source
11Home tanning bed sales: 5% of total market, $50 million revenue.
Verified
12Tanning lotions and accelerators: $400 million market segment.
Verified
1375% of salons offer spray tans alongside beds.
Verified
14Australia tanning salon closures: 90% since 2015 bans.
Directional
15LED tanning bed innovation: 10% market penetration by 2023.
Single source
16Profit margin for tanning salons: 15-20% average.
Verified
17Brazil tanning market: largest in South America, $200 million.
Verified
18Regulatory bans reduced US salons by 10,000 since 2010.
Verified
19Membership fees generate 60% of salon revenue.
Directional
20Tanning bed maintenance costs: $2,000 per bed annually.
Single source
21Asia-Pacific tanning market growth: 4.5% CAGR to 2028.
Verified
22Franchise tanning chains: 20% of US market share.
Verified
23UV lamp replacement: every 800-1000 hours, $300/set.
Verified
24Online tanning product sales: $150 million in 2022.
Directional
25Decline in bed sales: 50% drop post-2014 FDA reclassification.
Single source

Industry Data Interpretation

Even as the glow of its revenue fades, the indoor tanning industry clings to a bronze-dollar reality, where relentless regulations and shifting beauty standards have scorched its once-booming landscape into a smaller, more defensive market, now heavily reliant on loyal members and spray-on alternatives.

Safety Regulations

1All 50 US states regulate tanning beds, mostly age 18+.
Verified
2FDA classifies tanning beds as moderate risk (Class II) devices since 2014.
Verified
3California bans indoor tanning for under 18 since 2011.
Verified
421 US states prohibit minors under 18 from tanning beds.
Directional
5EU bans tanning beds for under 18 across all member states since 2019.
Single source
6Required warning labels on beds: "Avoid contact with eyes and skin."
Verified
7Max UV exposure limits: 0.3 W/m² for type 3 beds per IEC standards.
Verified
8Australia nationwide ban on commercial tanning beds since 2015.
Verified
9New York requires parental consent for 17-year-olds.
Directional
10Brazil bans tanning beds entirely since 2009.
Single source
11Operator training mandatory in 40 US states, 4-8 hours minimum.
Verified
12Protective eyewear required by federal law for all users.
Verified
13Annual salon inspections required in 15 states.
Verified
14UK restricts high-pressure beds, irradiance <0.3 W/m².
Directional
15Canada provincial bans: all minors under 18 prohibited.
Single source
16Warning signs must state cancer risk in 12-point font in many states.
Verified
17Session timers mandatory, auto-shutoff after max time.
Verified
1810 states ban all indoor tanning outright.
Verified
19Pre-session skin assessment required in Florida regulations.
Directional
20Russia bans tanning for under 18 and limits sessions to 20/year.
Single source
21NSF/ANSI 52 standard for tanning bed safety certification.
Verified
22Liability insurance mandatory for salons in 25 states.
Verified
23Record-keeping of customer sessions required for 2 years federally.
Verified
2482 countries have some form of tanning bed restrictions.
Directional

Safety Regulations Interpretation

Despite this vast global patchwork of restrictions and stern warnings about cancer risk, it seems humanity’s primary defense against turning into a leather handbag is a pair of cheap, government-mandated goggles.

Usage Statistics

113.1 million US adults used tanning beds at least once in 2020.
Verified
235% of white girls aged 16-18 have used indoor tanning facilities.
Verified
3High school students indoor tanning prevalence: 19% nationally in 2019.
Verified
470% of tanning salon visitors are women aged 18-29 years old.
Directional
5Average American tanner visits salon 28 times per year.
Single source
62.1 million US teens aged 12-17 tanned indoors in past year (2018).
Verified
7Northeast US has highest tanning bed usage at 25.6% among adults.
Verified
841% of college women report lifetime indoor tanning experience.
Verified
9Indoor tanning peaks in winter months, with 50% increase in visits.
Directional
1055% of frequent tanners are addicted-like, visiting >20 times/year.
Single source
11Black women tanning prevalence: 6.1% vs 30% for white women.
Verified
12Average age of first tanning bed use: 17 years among youth.
Verified
1325% decline in indoor tanning among US high schoolers from 2009-2019.
Verified
14Sorority members tan indoors 2.5 times more than non-members.
Directional
15Young adult women (18-25) have 32% indoor tanning rate.
Single source
16Men represent 23% of all indoor tanning salon customers.
Verified
17Lifetime prevalence among white females 16-25: 58%.
Verified
18Tanning bed usage highest in Midwest states at 22%.
Verified
198.2% of US high school girls used indoor tanning in past year (2019).
Directional
20Frequent tanning (>10 visits/year) in 14% of young adult women.
Single source
21Indoor tanning among Hispanics: 4.3% prevalence rate.
Verified
22Average session duration: 12 minutes, 3x/week for regulars.
Verified
23Decline in youth tanning post-bans: 15% drop in banned states.
Verified
2430% of tanners start before age 16 despite regulations.
Directional
25US tanning salon visits total 30 million annually pre-COVID.
Single source
26Female college athletes tan 1.5x more than non-athletes.
Verified

Usage Statistics Interpretation

Behind the glowing veneer of America's tanning bed obsession lies a starkly illuminated portrait of a dangerously persistent youth-centric beauty standard, disproportionately targeting young white women with addictive regularity despite a declining overall trend.

Sources & References

  • SKINCANCER logo
    Reference 1
    SKINCANCER
    skincancer.org
    Visit source
  • PUBMED logo
    Reference 2
    PUBMED
    pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Visit source
  • AAD logo
    Reference 3
    AAD
    aad.org
    Visit source
  • FDA logo
    Reference 4
    FDA
    fda.gov
    Visit source
  • CDC logo
    Reference 5
    CDC
    cdc.gov
    Visit source
  • SKINCANCERFOUNDATION logo
    Reference 6
    SKINCANCERFOUNDATION
    skincancerfoundation.org
    Visit source
  • NCBI logo
    Reference 7
    NCBI
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Visit source
  • WHO logo
    Reference 8
    WHO
    who.int
    Visit source
  • IBISWORLD logo
    Reference 9
    IBISWORLD
    ibisworld.com
    Visit source
  • STATISTA logo
    Reference 10
    STATISTA
    statista.com
    Visit source
  • GRANDVIEWRESEARCH logo
    Reference 11
    GRANDVIEWRESEARCH
    grandviewresearch.com
    Visit source
  • MARKETSANDMARKETS logo
    Reference 12
    MARKETSANDMARKETS
    marketsandmarkets.com
    Visit source
  • BLS logo
    Reference 13
    BLS
    bls.gov
    Visit source
  • FORTUNEBUSINESSINSIGHTS logo
    Reference 14
    FORTUNEBUSINESSINSIGHTS
    fortunebusinessinsights.com
    Visit source
  • TANNINGBEDBOOTH logo
    Reference 15
    TANNINGBEDBOOTH
    tanningbedbooth.com
    Visit source
  • ALLIEDMARKETRESEARCH logo
    Reference 16
    ALLIEDMARKETRESEARCH
    alliedmarketresearch.com
    Visit source
  • HEALTH logo
    Reference 17
    HEALTH
    health.gov.au
    Visit source
  • TANNINGBUSINESS logo
    Reference 18
    TANNINGBUSINESS
    tanningbusiness.com
    Visit source
  • EUROMONITOR logo
    Reference 19
    EUROMONITOR
    euromonitor.com
    Visit source
  • FRANCHISEDIRECT logo
    Reference 20
    FRANCHISEDIRECT
    franchisedirect.com
    Visit source
  • SUNSPABROKERS logo
    Reference 21
    SUNSPABROKERS
    sunspabrokers.com
    Visit source
  • RESEARCHANDMARKETS logo
    Reference 22
    RESEARCHANDMARKETS
    researchandmarkets.com
    Visit source
  • FRANCHISETIMES logo
    Reference 23
    FRANCHISETIMES
    franchisetimes.com
    Visit source
  • ERGOLINE logo
    Reference 24
    ERGOLINE
    ergoline.com
    Visit source
  • NCSL logo
    Reference 25
    NCSL
    ncsl.org
    Visit source
  • FEDERALREGISTER logo
    Reference 26
    FEDERALREGISTER
    federalregister.gov
    Visit source
  • LEGINFO logo
    Reference 27
    LEGINFO
    leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
    Visit source
  • EC logo
    Reference 28
    EC
    ec.europa.eu
    Visit source
  • ACCESSDATA logo
    Reference 29
    ACCESSDATA
    accessdata.fda.gov
    Visit source
  • HEALTH logo
    Reference 30
    HEALTH
    health.nsw.gov.au
    Visit source
  • HEALTH logo
    Reference 31
    HEALTH
    health.ny.gov
    Visit source
  • ANVISA logo
    Reference 32
    ANVISA
    anvisa.gov.br
    Visit source
  • LEGISLATION logo
    Reference 33
    LEGISLATION
    legislation.gov.uk
    Visit source
  • CANADA logo
    Reference 34
    CANADA
    canada.ca
    Visit source
  • LEG logo
    Reference 35
    LEG
    leg.state.fl.us
    Visit source
  • NSF logo
    Reference 36
    NSF
    nsf.org
    Visit source
  • INSUREON logo
    Reference 37
    INSUREON
    insureon.com
    Visit source
  • IARC logo
    Reference 38
    IARC
    iarc.who.int
    Visit source

Logos provided by Logo.dev

On this page

  1. 01Key Takeaways
  2. 02Alternatives and Comparisons
  3. 03Health Risks
  4. 04Industry Data
  5. 05Safety Regulations
  6. 06Usage Statistics
David Kowalski

David Kowalski

Author

Katherine Brennan
Editor
Abigail Foster
Fact Checker

Our Commitment to Accuracy

  • Rigorous fact-checking process
  • Data from reputable sources
  • Regular updates to ensure relevance
Learn more

Explore More In This Category

  • Beauty Statistics
  • Aesthetic Device Industry Statistics
  • Glp-1 Beauty Industry Statistics
  • Scent Industry Statistics
  • South Korea Plastic Surgery Statistics
  • Professional Salon Industry Statistics