Racial Discrimination Statistics: Market Report & Data

Our Newsletter

The Business Week In Data

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!

Table of Contents

In this era of increased awareness about human rights and equality, it’s essential to reflect upon and understand the pervasive issue of racial discrimination. This blog post delves deep into the data perspective, examining the eye-opening racial discrimination statistics. By presenting these daunting figures and breaking them down, we aim to highlight the urgency of tackling this issue. These statistics not only illuminate the disparities faced by different races but also provide a factual groundwork for formulating effective strategies to combat racial discrimination.

The Latest Racial Discrimination Statistics Unveiled

The 2019 survey by Pew Research Center found that 58% of US adults say that race relations in the United States are “generally bad.”

In the milieu of a blog post on Racial Discrimination Statistics, the 2019 Pew Research Center finding serves as a revealing metric, conjuring a mirror held up to American society. Revealing that a staggering 58% of US adults perceive race relations to be ‘generally bad’, this statistic metaphorically magnifies the pulse of the American audience’s sentiment on racial dynamics. Offering quantifiable substance to anecdotal evidence and narratives on discrimination, this information lends credence to conversations about racial bias, showcasing the urgency to address entrenched racial disparities. This represents not just individual perspectives, but a broader socio-cultural reality that can fuel the urgency for policy changes and collective action to bridge racial gaps.

According to a 2020 report by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Black job applicants received fewer callbacks than white job applicants by 36%.

In painting a comprehensive picture of racial discrimination, the 2020 report by the National Bureau of Economic Research serves as a stark reminder of the persisting disparity in the job market. It underscores pointedly that Black job applicants are confronted with a formidable barrier even in the formative steps of job application procedures, receiving 36% fewer callbacks than their white counterparts. Such a statistic simultaneously humanizes the abstract concept of prejudice, prompting an immediate understanding of the magnitude and impact of racial bias in the job recruitment process. It effectively quantifies discrimination, providing tangible evidence of systemic inequalities black applicants continue to face, strengthening the dialogue on racial discrimination.

According to the 2020 survey by Pew Research Center, 58% of Black adults say they have been unfairly stopped by police because of their race or ethnicity.

Drowning us in the staggering reality of racial discrimination, the 2020 survey by Pew Research Center discloses formidable evidence: 58% of Black adults report experiencing unjust treatment at the hands of law enforcement due to their race or ethnicity. This hard-hitting number fuels the narrative of systemic bias, setting a sobering tone for the conversation on racial disparities. In a blog post dedicated to Racial Discrimination Statistics, this figure serves as a chilling cornerstone, capturing the blatant discrimination that’s spilling over our societal structures, not least of which is law enforcement. Such a statistic amplifies the need for dialogue, reform, and most importantly, empathy, in a society that prides itself on equality and justice for all.

As per a 2018 study by the Economic Policy Institute, the wealth gap between white families and black families in the US has more than tripled in the past 50 years.

Weaving a vivid tapestry of racial discrimination statistics, the staggering revelation unearthed by the Economic Policy Institute in 2018 is profoundly influential. It showcases the mushrooming wealth chasm between white and black families in the US, a divide that’s ballooned to over thrice its size in half a century. This alarming trend underscores the entrenched systemic disparities that continue to encode racial discrimination into fiscal realities, painting a stark picture of economic inequality that is crucial to the ongoing discourse on racial prejudices. It illuminates the prevailing economic injustices driven by race, thus stressing the urgency for equitable financial policies and anti-discrimination measures.

According to a 2020 study by the Center for Policing Equity, Black people were 3.23 times more likely than white people to be killed by police.

Unveiling the harsh disparities that exist in our society, the 2020 study by the Center for Policing Equity offers an unvarnished look into the stark reality of racial discrimination. The striking statistic that Black people are 3.23 times more likely to be killed by police than white people brings to the forefront the profound systemic imbalance within the bounds of law enforcement. This alarming multiplier, a crimson banner waved in the face of societal equality, begs for immediate attention and action, highlighting the dire need for comprehensive policing reforms in the fight against racial bias, injustice and prejudice. As such, the potency of this number is immense, underscoring with measurable certainty the uphill battle confronting us in striving for racial equity.

A 2016 study by the Yale School of Medicine found that Black children are three times less likely to receive medical attention than white children.

In the tapestry of racial discrimination statistics, the 2016 Yale School of Medicine study threads an alarming narrative, spotlighting a glaring disparity in healthcare privilege. The finding echoes the bitter reality that Black children, shockingly, have threefold lower odds of receiving medical attention compared to their white counterparts. This poignant statistic mirrors the gnarled roots of systemic racism infiltrating even the sanctity of healthcare, making it a vital talking point for us to comprehend the scale of racial inequality, recognize the imperative for change, and drive meaningful conversations about equitable healthcare access for all, regardless of race.

In 2019, a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that teachers in the US have lower expectations for their black students than for their white students.

Peeling back the layers of the sobering revelation from the 2019 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research, we get a powerful snapshot of the racial discrimination present in education. This statistic significantly underscores the need for adaptive and transformative reform in the educational sector, and makes a compelling argument in a blog post discussing racial bias statistics. It dramatically portrays how race-related bias amongst educators may fuel an achievement gap between Black and White students. This gap has far-reaching implications for the socioeconomic trajectories of Black students, making this statistic not only a stark indicator of disparities within the classroom, but also a profound testament to the pervasive ripple effects of systemic racism.

According to a 2016 study published by the American Psychological Association, Asian Americans were more likely to report indirect racial discrimination

Intertwined in the discourse of a blog post about racial discrimination statistics, the revelation from a 2016 study by the American Psychological Association exposes an undercurrent of bias experienced by Asian Americans. It illuminates that not all racial discrimination is overt; sometimes, it’s nuanced and indirect, causing an equally damaging impact. By acknowledging that Asian Americans are more likely to report such passive-aggressive experiences, we underscore the breadth and depth of racial discrimination’s impact, giving voice to the invisible struggles of a group often mistakenly seen as the “model minority”. This insight is crucial as it challenges us to consider and address the less visible forms of prejudice, expanding the conversation beyond blatant racism.

In 2020, the Anti-Defamation League reported that 61% of all extremist-related murders in the US were by white supremacists.

In a blog post about Racial Discrimination Statistics, the inclusion of the statistic that the Anti-Defamation League reported in 2020 – 61% of all extremist-related murders in the US were committed by white supremacists, offers a fierce gaze into the gruesome reality of racially-fueled extremism. It pinpoints white supremacy as a devasting contributor to racial discrimination in America, manifesting in lethal consequences. Moreover, it serves as a quantifiable testimony of the pervasiveness of racial hate crimes, prodding society to acknowledge, confront, and strive for the eradication of such deep-rooted prejudice and hatred.

A 2020 study by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development found that racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to be denied a home loan than white people.

Underscoring the pervasiveness of racial inequality, the 2020 study by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development paints a distressing picture of contemporary discrimination. It significantly highlights the hazardous barriers imposed on racial and ethnic minorities who are disproportionately burdened with loan denial, compared to their white counterparts. Amplifying our comprehension of racial disparity, this statistic illuminatively acts as a telltale indicator of systemic prejudice. Cascading far beyond mere numbers, it probes into the societal structures at play, spotlighting the urgent need to rectify and eradicate such entrenched bias, making it a potent addition to any dialogue on racial discrimination statistics.

A 2017 study conducted by the American Association of University Women found racial discrimination at work affects the wage gap, with women of color earning significantly less than their white, non-Hispanic male colleagues.

Unveiling the roots of complex societal issues demands our attention to pivotal studies, such as the one conducted by the American Association of University Women in 2017. This groundbreaking research reveals the deep-seated interconnection between racial discrimination at workplaces and the prevailing wage gap. It boldly propels the painful truth into the spotlight – women of color face a double whammy of being at the juncture of sexism and racism, earning considerably less than their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts. Within the sphere of racial discrimination statistics, this chilling reality keeps an urgent call to action alive, shining a light on the stark discrepancies born from prejudice that need addressing with informed policies, programs, and workplace reforms.

A 2019 Pew research survey found that black adults are about five times as likely as whites to say they’ve been unfairly treated by the police because of their race.

The aforementioned 2019 Pew Research survey statistic is a stark indicator of the ongoing racial disparity pervading our law enforcement systems. Providing an evidence-based numerical backing, it highlights the racial biases faced by black people in their interactions with police. This five-fold discrepancy underscores the magnitude of racial discrimination, acting as a grim testament to the fact that ethnicity often determines an individual’s treatment by the law enforcement officials. Unveiling racial bias from such an influential institution, this statistic forms a critical reference point in discussing racial discrimination statistics.

A 2020 census data analysis by the US News found that black college graduates hold lesser wealth than white dropouts.

Illuminating an alarming disparity, the 2020 census data analysis by US News paints a striking contrast between the financial experiences of black college graduates and white dropouts. Used within a blog post about Racial Discrimination Statistics, this data reinforces the systemic racial wealth divide, emphasizing that even education — often hailed as the great equalizer — fails to outrun the long shadows of bigotry and discrimination. The statistic beckons for real structural changes, serving as a stark reminder that racial discrimination penetrates every stratum of society and that our conversations about racial wealth gaps must extend beyond income to consider the complex, intergenerational implications of racial inequity.

According to the 2020 data of the USC Price Centre, Latino homeownership rate is 25% lower than whites.

Highlighting the disparity of Latino homeownership rate, which is a stark 25% lower than that of whites according to the 2020 data from the USC Price Center, paints a clear picture of the existing racial inequities in paradise real estate. This glaring discrepancy weaves itself into the narrative of systemic racial discrimination, fortifying a swift call to action. This statistic illuminates a hidden aspect of racial prejudice, unraveling how deeply entrenched racial disparities are within the framework of real estate, a cornerstone of the American Dream. Thus, for those documenting Racial Discrimination Statistics, it serves as a compelling testament of enduring socio-economic inequalities driven by race.

A 2017 research by the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that discrimination in lending could cost black borrowers about $765 more than white borrowers.

The staggering revelation by the 2017 research from the National Bureau of Economic Research paints a stark picture of the economic cost of racial discrimination. Highlighting a sizeable $765 disparity in lending costs between black and white borrowers, it puts a sobering quantifiable perspective on the financial burden borne disproportionately by black communities. Such economic prejudice speaks volumes about systemic disadvantages that perpetuate racial inequality, giving readers an unambiguous, concrete financial snapshot of the deep-seated biases in our social and economic structure. This numeric articulation in the economic landscape serves as a powerful testament to the pervasive reality of racial discrimination, underscoring the urgent need for fairness and equal opportunities.

NAACP 2020 report highlights the fact that black people in the United States are more than five times as likely to be incarcerated as white people.

The statistic underlining the NAACP 2020 report that black people in the United States are more than five times as likely to be incarcerated as white people unveils a disconcerting reality. It presents a cogent argument for deep-seated racial inequality interwoven into the justice system. This revelation, pertinent to a blog post about Racial Discrimination Statistics, provides concrete data that flags systemic racial biases. The fact underscores the necessity for urgent overhaul and reform to challenge, change, and eliminate such discriminatory practices.

As per a 2018 study in the American Journal of Health Behavior, African American smokers are 12% less likely to quit than white smokers.

Scratching beneath the surface of the racial disparities, the 2018 study of the American Journal of Health Behavior presents an understated but significant facet of racial discrimination – health inequalities between African American smokers and white smokers. This 12% lowered likelihood of African American smokers to quit, compared to their white counterparts, is more than just a number. It points toward the systematic lack of access to rehabilitation resources, proper health care, or even information and awareness as a component of an entrenched racial bias. The lower quitting rates reflect not only a public health issue, but also institutional inequality, enlightening us on the pervasive effects of racial discrimination that bleed into various aspects of life, including something as personal and critical as health.


Racial discrimination continues to persist as a serious issue around the globe, with quantifiable impacts observed in various aspects of society such as education, employment, healthcare, and criminal justice system. The statistical trends clearly indicate that racial minority groups consistently face disparities and discrimination. These findings stress the need for clear, cooperative, and continuous action towards eradicating systemic racism. It is critical for policymakers, organizations, and individuals to understand these statistics and strive to create a more equitable and inclusive society for all.


0. –

1. –

2. –

3. –

4. –

5. –

6. –

7. –

8. –

9. –

10. –

11. –

12. –


What is racial discrimination?

Racial discrimination refers to the unfair treatment of individuals and groups on the basis of their race, color, descent, ethnic origin, or national origin. It involves treating people less favorably, or proposing to do so, because of their racial or ethnic background.

What are some examples of racial discrimination?

Examples of racial discrimination could include a business refusing service because of someone's race, an employer not hiring or promoting someone based on their racial background, or a landlord rejecting potential tenants due to their ethnic origin.

How can racial discrimination be measured statistically?

Racial discrimination can be measured statistically through various methods such as surveying individuals about their experiences, analyzing outcomes in areas like employment, education, housing, and healthcare between different racial or ethnic groups, or conducting social experiments, i.e., matched-guise studies or audit studies.

What are the possible impacts of racial discrimination?

The impacts of racial discrimination can be profound and wide-ranging. It can lead to socioeconomic disparities, dilute political representation, impede equal access to education and healthcare, create psychological stress and trauma, and perpetuate social inequalities.

What measures can be taken to combat racial discrimination?

Combating racial discrimination requires comprehensive measures including enforcing anti-discrimination laws, promoting racial and ethnic diversity in all spheres of life, engaging in public education campaigns to challenge racial prejudices, and implementing affirmative actions plans as a form of redress for historical racial injustices.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents

... Before You Leave, Catch This! 🔥

Your next business insight is just a subscription away. Our newsletter The Week in Data delivers the freshest statistics and trends directly to you. Stay informed, stay ahead—subscribe now.

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!