While often cast in shadow, the quiet hum of nuclear reactors worldwide provides nearly 10% of our global electricity, powering nations from France, where it supplies 70% of the power, to the UAE with its new Barakah plant, all while operating as one of the safest, most reliable, and lowest-carbon energy sources we have.
Key Takeaways
- In 2023, global nuclear electricity generation reached 2,653 TWh, accounting for 9.2% of total world electricity production
- Worldwide, 413 operable civil nuclear power reactors are in operation as of mid-2024, with a total net installed capacity of 386.3 GWe
- The United States has 93 operable nuclear reactors with a net capacity of 95,452 MWe as of 2024
- There were 61 nuclear power reactors under construction worldwide as of July 2024, mostly in Asia
- The global average capacity factor for nuclear power plants was 82.3% in 2023, compared to 56% for renewables overall
- Lifetime deaths per TWh: nuclear 0.03 (including Chernobyl/Fukushima), vs coal 24.6, oil 18.4, gas 2.8, hydro 1.3
- From 1969-2023, nuclear energy avoided over 72 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions globally
- Nuclear power avoided 64 Gt CO2-eq emissions from 1971-2018, equivalent to 2x annual global emissions
- Nuclear lifecycle emissions: 12 gCO2/kWh vs wind 11, solar 48, gas 490, coal 820
- Levelized cost of nuclear: $77/MWh (2023), vs coal $88, gas $59-170, unsubsidized solar $59, wind $40 but intermittent
- U.S. nuclear construction cost: Vogtle AP1000 Units 3-4 at $15.5B/GW, overruns due to first-of-kind
- Overnight capital cost for new nuclear: $6,695/kW (Gen III+), vs coal $3,794, gas $1,092
- Waste volume: 250 tonnes heavy metal/year per GW vs coal ash 300,000 tonnes/GW
- Spent fuel: after 10 years cooling, 95% is recyclable uranium/plutonium
- High-level waste (HLW): 3 cubic meters per GW-year, vitrified for disposal
Global nuclear power provides reliable low-carbon electricity for many nations worldwide.
Economic Aspects
- Levelized cost of nuclear: $77/MWh (2023), vs coal $88, gas $59-170, unsubsidized solar $59, wind $40 but intermittent
- U.S. nuclear construction cost: Vogtle AP1000 Units 3-4 at $15.5B/GW, overruns due to first-of-kind
- Overnight capital cost for new nuclear: $6,695/kW (Gen III+), vs coal $3,794, gas $1,092
- French EPR Flamanville 3: €12.7B for 1.65 GW (€7,700/kW), delays from 2007-2024
- Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) nuclear: $36-90/MWh in Korea (stable supply chain)
- U.S. operating nuclear fleet: $29/MWh fuel + O&M, capacity factor 92%
- Decommissioning costs: U.S. average $500M per reactor, funded by 0.1-0.2 c/kWh fee
- Financing: nuclear projects require 60-70% debt at 4-6% interest, sensitive to rates
- SMR economics: NuScale VOYGR 77 MW module $5,114/kW capital, LCOE $89/MWh at scale
- Lifetime nuclear plant cost: $0.03-0.05/kWh, competitive with renewables + storage ($0.05-0.10)
- Subsidies: U.S. nuclear PTC $15/MWh (2022 IRA), offsets production tax credit for fossils
- Job creation: 1 nuclear GW supports 800 permanent jobs, 3,000 construction, vs wind 300 perm
- Fuel cost stability: uranium $50-90/lb U3O8, 0.5-1% of electricity cost, vs gas volatility
- Extension costs: U.S. license renewal $200-500M/reactor, adds 20 years value $10B+
- China Hualong One: $2,800/kW construction cost, 5-year build, LCOE $50/MWh
- UAE Barakah: $20B for 5.6 GW ($3,570/kW), on-time/budget, O&M $10/MWh
- UK Hinkley Point C EPR: £25-26B for 3.2 GW (£7,800/kW), CfD strike price £92.50/MWh (2013 prices)
- Savings from nuclear: U.S. avoided $2.5T fuel costs 1973-2022 due to efficiency
- Return on investment: Diablo Canyon extension NPV $13B+ at 5% discount
- Global nuclear investment: $50B/year needed to triple capacity by 2050 per IEA
Economic Aspects Interpretation
Nuclear power appears to be a financial paradox: while its often eye-watering upfront costs and construction dramas could star in a fiscal horror story, its proven ability to provide immense quantities of stable, clean power at a competitive lifetime price—and even save trillions—suggests the real horror would be trying to replace it.
Environmental Impact
- From 1969-2023, nuclear energy avoided over 72 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions globally
- Nuclear power avoided 64 Gt CO2-eq emissions from 1971-2018, equivalent to 2x annual global emissions
- Nuclear lifecycle emissions: 12 gCO2/kWh vs wind 11, solar 48, gas 490, coal 820
- Land use per TWh/year: nuclear 0.3 km² vs coal 0.96, wind 70-426, solar 3.8-103
- Nuclear fuel mining impact: 0.001-0.002% of Earth's land disrupted vs coal's 0.1-0.5%
- Uranium ore grade average 0.1-0.2% U, tailings managed with 95% water recycling
- Fast reactors can reduce nuclear waste radiotoxicity by 99% and use depleted uranium
- Nuclear provides stable baseload, reducing fossil fuel backup needs and grid emissions by 20-30%
- Water usage: nuclear 2.3 L/kWh cooling vs coal 2.1, gas 1.0, wind/solar 0 but intermittency requires reservoirs
- Thermal pollution from nuclear cooling: <1°C rise, regulated, similar to fossil plants
- Biodiversity: nuclear sites often become reserves post-decommissioning, hosting rare species
- Air pollution deaths avoided by nuclear: 1.8 million per year globally vs coal/gas
- Closed fuel cycle recycles 96% of spent fuel, reducing waste volume by 90%
- Nuclear displaces coal: each GW nuclear avoids 7 Mt CO2/year and 10,000 tons SO2/NOx
- Seawater desalination: nuclear powers 10% of world's capacity, reducing fossil water use
- Material footprint: nuclear 58 kg/GWh vs solar PV 175, wind 335, gas 0.5 but methane leaks
- Mining waste: nuclear 110 m³/TWh vs coal 36,000 m³/TWh
- French nuclear: 70% low-carbon electricity, CO2 intensity 6 g/kWh vs EU average 240 g/kWh
- Ontario CANDUs: lifecycle emissions 10 gCO2/kWh, lowest among all sources studied
- Nuclear avoids ocean acidification from CO2, preserving marine life better than fossils
Environmental Impact Interpretation
For all the flack it gets, the quiet, land-efficient workhorse of nuclear power has been our most potent, if controversial, chess piece against climate catastrophe, proving that saving the planet requires more than just good intentions—it demands dense, relentless, and scalable energy.
Production and Capacity
- In 2023, global nuclear electricity generation reached 2,653 TWh, accounting for 9.2% of total world electricity production
- Worldwide, 413 operable civil nuclear power reactors are in operation as of mid-2024, with a total net installed capacity of 386.3 GWe
- The United States has 93 operable nuclear reactors with a net capacity of 95,452 MWe as of 2024
- France generated 379.5 TWh from nuclear power in 2022, representing 69.5% of its total electricity production
- China's nuclear capacity reached 57.2 GWe at end-2023 with 55 reactors operating and 23 under construction
- In 2022, nuclear power provided 18.2% of electricity in the European Union (EU27), totaling 645 TWh
- South Korea's 24 operable reactors had a net capacity of 23,773 MWe in 2023, generating 134.7 TWh (26.7% of total electricity)
- Ukraine's 15 reactors at four plants produced 16.1 TWh in 2022 despite conflict, with total capacity 13,800 MWe
- India's 23 operable reactors had 7,480 MWe capacity in 2023, generating 47.3 TWh (3.1% of electricity)
- Russia operated 36 reactors with 28,351 MWe net capacity in 2023, producing 208.1 TWh (18.4% of electricity)
- Canada's 19 CANDU reactors had 13,552 MWe capacity, generating 92.2 TWh (14.9% of electricity) in 2022
- United Arab Emirates' Barakah plant has 4 reactors totaling 5,600 MWe, all operational by 2024
- Pakistan's six reactors total 3,262 MWe, generating 15.3 TWh (8.5% of electricity) in 2022
- Sweden's 6 reactors produced 67.5 TWh (40% of electricity) with 7,009 MWe capacity in 2022
- Switzerland's 4 reactors generated 28.4 TWh (37% of electricity) with 3,010 MWe in 2022
- Spain's 7 reactors produced 54.6 TWh (20.1% of electricity) with 7,117 MWe capacity in 2022
- Belgium's 7 reactors generated 47.5 TWh (50.3% of electricity) with 5,912 MWe in 2022 before phase-out plans
- Global nuclear capacity factor averaged 81.6% in 2022, higher than coal (46.5%) and gas (55.3%)
- The top 10 nuclear countries produced 86% of global nuclear electricity in 2022
- Japan's 33 reactors had 31,348 MWe capacity but only 12 operating post-Fukushima, generating 69.4 TWh (7.1%) in 2022
- United Kingdom's 9 reactors produced 70.4 TWh (15.5% of electricity) with 5,894 MWe in 2022
- Czech Republic's 6 reactors generated 29.1 TWh (35.6%) with 3,928 MWe in 2022
- Slovakia's 4 reactors produced 15.3 TWh (53.5%) with 2,032 MWe in 2022
- Hungary's 4 reactors (Paks) generated 15.2 TWh (48.7%) with 1,959 MWe in 2022
- Bulgaria's 2 reactors produced 15.3 TWh (35.2%) with 2,000 MWe in 2022
- Romania's 2 reactors generated 13.8 TWh (19.8%) with 1,300 MWe in 2022
- Argentina's 3 reactors produced 7.9 TWh (7.3%) with 1,763 MWe in 2022
- Mexico's Laguna Verde 2 reactors generated 10.5 TWh (4.5%) with 1,461 MWe in 2022
- Armenia's Metsamor 1 reactor produced 2.3 TWh (25.3%) with 376 MWe in 2022
- Brazil's Angra 2 reactor generated 14.5 TWh (2.9%) with 1,350 MWe in 2022
Production and Capacity Interpretation
While 413 nuclear reactors quietly provide nearly one-tenth of the world's electricity with stubborn reliability, they also reveal a stark geopolitical tapestry where France runs on atoms, Ukraine's plants defiantly hum amid conflict, and China is building the future one reactor at a time.
Safety Records
- There were 61 nuclear power reactors under construction worldwide as of July 2024, mostly in Asia
- The global average capacity factor for nuclear power plants was 82.3% in 2023, compared to 56% for renewables overall
- Lifetime deaths per TWh: nuclear 0.03 (including Chernobyl/Fukushima), vs coal 24.6, oil 18.4, gas 2.8, hydro 1.3
- Chernobyl accident (1986) caused 31 direct deaths and ~4,000-9,000 projected long-term cancer deaths (UNSCEAR)
- Fukushima Daiichi (2011) resulted in 0 direct radiation deaths and ~2,200 indirect deaths from evacuation stress
- Three Mile Island (1979) partial meltdown caused no deaths or injuries from radiation
- IAEA reports 0 fatal accidents at nuclear power plants from 2000-2023 in OECD countries
- Nuclear plants have a safety record of 1 incident per 3.6 million reactor-years (1960-2022)
- Radiation exposure from living near a nuclear plant: 0.01 mSv/year vs natural background 2.4 mSv/year
- French nuclear fleet (56 reactors) had zero core damage incidents in 50+ years of operation
- U.S. nuclear plants operate at 92.7% capacity factor with stringent NRC oversight, zero accidents since 1979
- Gen III+ reactors like AP1000 have passive safety systems reducing core melt risk to 1 in 10 million reactor-years
- Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) designed with meltdown probability <1E-7 per reactor-year
- Post-Fukushima, all new reactors incorporate filtered containment venting and hardened structures
- Occupational deaths per TWh: nuclear 0.04 vs coal 32.7 (including mining)
- Wind turbines cause 0.04 deaths/TWh, solar rooftop 0.44, nuclear lowest at 0.03 including accidents
- IAEA's International Reporting System logs ~3,000 minor events annually, none severe since 2011
- U.S. nuclear incident rate: 0.68 events per 7,000 reactor-years (1970-2022), mostly non-radiological
- EPR reactor at Flamanville designed for severe accident mitigation with 4 redundant safety trains
- CANDU reactors have positive void coefficient but inherent safety via heavy water moderation, zero accidents in 400 reactor-years
- Russia's VVER-1200 has core catcher and melt trap, tested for Fukushima+ scenarios
- Global nuclear safety improvements post-Chernobyl: core damage frequency reduced by factor of 10
- No Level 5+ INES incidents since Fukushima (Level 7), 13 years radiation-free operations
Safety Records Interpretation
Nuclear power, despite its cinematic disasters, is statistically less deadly than your daily commute and more reliable than your favorite weather forecast, all while Asia builds the next chapter.
Waste Management
- Waste volume: 250 tonnes heavy metal/year per GW vs coal ash 300,000 tonnes/GW
- Spent fuel: after 10 years cooling, 95% is recyclable uranium/plutonium
- High-level waste (HLW): 3 cubic meters per GW-year, vitrified for disposal
- U.S. spent fuel inventory: 88,000 tonnes as of 2023, dry cask storage 99% safe
- Finland's Onkalo: first deep geologic repository operational 2025 for 6,500 tonnes
- France La Hague reprocesses 1,100 tonnes/year, recycling 96%, reducing waste by 5x
- Yucca Mountain (canceled): designed for 70,000 tonnes, cost $96B over 100 years
- Intermediate-level waste (ILW): cement-encased, 20,000 m³/year global, shallow disposal
- LLW volume: 90% of total waste by volume but 0.1% radioactivity, incinerated/compacted
- Radiotoxicity: spent fuel drops to uranium ore levels in 9,000 years with reprocessing
- Dry cask storage: failure rate 1E-12 per package-year, hurricane/earthquake tested
- Sweden's final repository: copper canisters for 6 kg spent fuel each, 500m depth
- Cost of waste management: 5% of nuclear electricity cost, $0.001-0.002/kWh
- Transmutation: MYRRHA accelerator reduces actinides by 100x in fast spectrum
- Global spent fuel: 400,000 tonnes accumulated, 10,000 tonnes/year new
- Vitrification: HLW melted into glass logs, leach rate <1 g/m²/year for 10,000 years
- Partitioning & Transmutation (P&T): reduces long-lived waste half-life from 300,000 to 300 years
- U.S. NWPA fund: $45B collected for disposal, invested at 3-5% return
- Canada NWMO: deep geologic repository for 4.8M used fuel bundles (~300,000 tonnes)
- Volume reduction: compaction + incineration reduces LLW by 90%
Waste Management Interpretation
While nuclear waste sounds intimidating, the real story is that it's a hyper-concentrated problem we've largely solved technically, with one reactor-year's high-level waste fitting in a bathtub versus a coal plant's annual ash in a small skyscraper, yet our political will to dispose of it remains oddly diluted.
Sources & References
- Reference 1WORLD-NUCLEARworld-nuclear.orgVisit source
- Reference 2PRISpris.iaea.orgVisit source
- Reference 3EIAeia.govVisit source
- Reference 4IEAiea.orgVisit source
- Reference 5ENERGYenergy.ec.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 6CNSC-CCSNcnsc-ccsn.gc.caVisit source
- Reference 7STATISTAstatista.comVisit source
- Reference 8NEInei.orgVisit source
- Reference 9OURWORLDINDATAourworldindata.orgVisit source
- Reference 10UNSCEARunscear.orgVisit source
- Reference 11NRCnrc.govVisit source
- Reference 12WWW-PUBwww-pub.iaea.orgVisit source
- Reference 13WESTINGHOUSENUCLEARwestinghousenuclear.comVisit source
- Reference 14IAEAiaea.orgVisit source
- Reference 15FRAMATOMEframatome.comVisit source
- Reference 16ROSATOMrosatom.ruVisit source
- Reference 17OECD-NEAoecd-nea.orgVisit source
- Reference 18NATUREnature.comVisit source
- Reference 19WNA-ONLINEwna-online.orgVisit source
- Reference 20NRELnrel.govVisit source
- Reference 21EPAepa.govVisit source
- Reference 22KHAZZOOMkhazzoom.engr.ucdavis.eduVisit source
- Reference 23UNECEunece.orgVisit source
- Reference 24RTE-FRANCErte-france.comVisit source
- Reference 25CNAcna.caVisit source
- Reference 26IPCCipcc.chVisit source
- Reference 27LAZARDlazard.comVisit source
- Reference 28LBNLlbnl.govVisit source
- Reference 29NUSCALEPOWERnuscalepower.comVisit source
- Reference 30MCKINSEYmckinsey.comVisit source
- Reference 31ENERGYenergy.govVisit source
- Reference 32ENECenec.gov.aeVisit source
- Reference 33GOVgov.ukVisit source
- Reference 34ENERGYenergy.ca.govVisit source
- Reference 35POSIVAposiva.fiVisit source
- Reference 36ORANOorano.groupVisit source
- Reference 37SKBskb.comVisit source
- Reference 38MYRRHAmyrrha.sckcen.beVisit source
- Reference 39CORDIScordis.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 40NWMOnwmo.caVisit source