For women under 35 using their own eggs, the live birth rate per embryo transfer can exceed 50%. By age 42, that figure drops to roughly 13%. These statistics illuminate the decisive role of age and other critical factors in IVF outcomes.
Key Takeaways
- In 2021, the live birth rate per intended retrieval for women under 35 years old using non-donor eggs was 47.3%
- Shady Grove Fertility US 2021: 62.5% LBR/ET <35yo own eggs
- In the United States, overall IVF live birth rate was 41% in 2021 per CDC, but for donor eggs it's 59.4%
- Overall live birth rate for PCOS patients in IVF is 42% per cycle vs 38% non-PCOS per 2020 meta-analysis
- Frozen embryo transfer (FET) has 51.2% LBR/ET vs 44.5% fresh in 2021 CDC
IVF success rates are highest when clinics tailor treatment to your age and specific fertility diagnosis.
Related reading
02 · Category
Clinic-Specific26 stats
01
Shady Grove Fertility US 2021: 62.5% LBR/ET <35yo own eggs
02
CNY Fertility 2022: 56.6% live birth rate per transfer all patients
03
CCRM Fertility 2021: 70.2% LBR for <35 with PGS
04
Weill Cornell NYC 2020: 55% live birth/ET <35
05
RMA New Jersey 2021: 58.3% LBR/ET young patients
06
Pacific Fertility Center LA 2022: 65% success <35 own eggs
07
Kindbody 2021: 60% LBR per ET <38yo
08
Spring Fertility 2022: 68% live birth rate <35 PGS
09
New Hope Fertility NYC 2021: 75% LBR mini-IVF <35
10
Advanced Fertility Center Chicago 2020: 59% LBR/ET <35
11
Colorado Center Reproductive Medicine 2021: 72% with CCS testing <35
12
Houston Fertility Institute 2022: 57% live birth/transfer all ages
13
Texas Fertility Center 2021: 61.2% LBR <35
14
Reproductive Biology Associates Atlanta 2020: 64% success <35
15
Fertility Centers San Diego 2021: 66.5% LBR PGS patients
16
Sher Institutes 2022: 55% avg LBR per ET
17
Reproductive Medicine Associates Seattle 2021: 63% <35 own eggs
18
Boston IVF 2020: 58.7% LBR/ET young
19
Coastal Fertility 2021: 62% live birth rate <35
20
Heartland Center Omaha 2022: 60.4% success <35
21
NYU Langone Fertility 2021: 56% LBR all patients
22
Columbia Univ Fertility NYC 2020: 59.2% <35 ET
23
Progyny partner clinics avg 2021: 55-65% LBR young
24
IVF Australia Sydney 2021: 48% LBR/transfer <35
25
Virtus Health UK 2020: 42% live birth <35
26
Women & Infants RI 2021: 54% LBR own eggs <35
Interpretation
Clinic-Specific Interpretation
While clinics showcase rates that vary as widely as a magician’s hat trick, your best chance, realistically, often lands somewhere between a coin flip and a confident nod.
03 · Category
Geographic25 stats
01
In the United States, overall IVF live birth rate was 41% in 2021 per CDC, but for donor eggs it's 59.4%
02
UK HFEA reports average live birth rate of 29% per embryo transfer across all ages 2019-2021
03
Spain leads Europe with 35.9% live birth rate per cycle in 2020 ESHRE data
04
Australia national average LBR/transfer 32% for 2021 all ages
05
Canada 2020: 35% live birth per ET national avg per CARTR
06
France FIVNAT 2021: 28% LBR per transfer all patients
07
Germany 2020 DIR: 27.5% pregnancy rate per cycle all ages
08
Denmark highest in Europe at 40.2% LBR/cycle 2019 ESHRE
09
Sweden 37.8% live birth/transfer 2020 national registry
10
Netherlands 2020: 31% LBR per ET all ages
11
Belgium 34.5% live birth rate per cycle 2020 BZR
12
Italy national avg 25% LBR/ET 2021
13
Japan 2021: 20.8% live birth per ET all ages JSOG
14
Brazil 2020: 30% success rate per cycle major centers
15
India avg 35-40% LBR young patients but national 25% overall
16
South Africa 28% live birth/transfer 2021 SAMA
17
Singapore 35% LBR per ET 2020 national
18
Israel 2020: 38% live birth rate per cycle top clinics avg
19
Czech Republic 36.7% LBR/cycle 2019 ESHRE Europe high
20
Russia 2020: 32% pregnancy rate per ET national
21
Turkey 30% LBR all ages 2021 major centers
22
Mexico avg 28% live birth/transfer 2020 Latin America
23
Nordic countries avg 37% LBR/ET 2020
24
Middle East avg 33% success rate per cycle UAE/Qatar 2021
25
New Zealand 31% LBR/transfer 2021 national
Interpretation
Geographic Interpretation
While the global IVF success rate lottery offers odds ranging from a heartbreaking 20% to a heartening 59% with donor eggs, it's clear the house—or rather, the clinic, its protocols, and the biological factors at play—always holds the winning hand, and geography can be one of the strongest predictors of your ticket's value.
More related reading
04 · Category
Patient Factors25 stats
01
Overall live birth rate for PCOS patients in IVF is 42% per cycle vs 38% non-PCOS per 2020 meta-analysis
02
Women with BMI >30 have 27% lower live birth rate per IVF cycle vs normal BMI (meta-analysis 2019)
03
Smokers have 13% lower odds of live birth in IVF (CDC 2021 adjusted)
04
Endometriosis patients: 35% LBR/ET vs 45% tubal factor (SART 2020)
05
Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) women <35: 25% LBR vs 50% normal reserve
06
Male factor infertility alone: 48% LBR/ET similar to tubal (ESHRE 2019)
07
Uterine fibroids reduce IVF success by 15% per cycle (2021 study)
08
Diabetes type 2 patients: 20% lower LBR in IVF (meta 2020)
09
Hypertension history: 18% reduced live birth rate per ET (2022 cohort)
10
Previous cesarean: 10% higher miscarriage rate post-IVF (2021 data)
11
Thyroid dysfunction untreated: 30% lower success IVF (ESHRE guideline)
12
Anovulation non-PCOS: 40% LBR similar to PCOS treated
13
Hydrosalpinx uncorrected: 50% reduced implantation rate IVF
14
Vitamin D deficiency: 15% lower LBR odds (meta-analysis 2020)
15
Autoimmune diseases: 25% lower success rate per cycle (2021 review)
16
High AMH >4ng/ml: slightly higher 45% LBR but OHSS risk (SART)
17
Low responders AFC<5: 20% LBR/ET vs 45% normal (2020 study)
18
Cancer survivors post-chemo: 30% LBR with frozen eggs (2022)
19
Alcohol >7 units/week: 12% lower pregnancy rate IVF
20
Exercise >5hr/week intense: 15% reduced LBR (2021 cohort)
21
Stress high scores: no significant impact but 5% lower in some studies
22
Multiple prior losses: 28% LBR after RPL treatment IVF
23
Black women vs white: 15-20% lower LBR adjusted (CDC 2021)
24
Hispanic patients: 10% higher LBR than avg in some US data
25
Asian ethnicity: 8% lower implantation rate IVF (2020)
Interpretation
Patient Factors Interpretation
A complex mosaic of biology and circumstance reveals that while conditions like PCOS can slightly tilt the odds in an unexpected direction, factors from lifestyle choices to underlying health issues, and even societal inequities, systematically chip away at the already delicate calculus of IVF success.
05 · Category
Treatment Protocol25 stats
01
Frozen embryo transfer (FET) has 51.2% LBR/ET vs 44.5% fresh in 2021 CDC
02
PGS/PGT-A tested embryos: 60-70% LBR/ET vs 45% untested (SART 2020)
03
ICSI vs conventional IVF: 48% vs 50% LBR similar (ESHRE 2019)
04
Mild stimulation protocols: 35% LBR/cycle vs 38% standard (2021 RCT)
05
Donor eggs: 59.4% live birth/ET all ages CDC 2021
06
Blastocyst vs day 3 transfer: 55% vs 40% LBR/ET (meta 2020)
07
Single ET vs double: 50% vs 45% LBR but lower multiples (HFEA)
08
GnRH agonist trigger: 40% LBR in high responders vs 35% hCG
09
ERA tested transfers: 73% implantation rate vs 50% standard (2022)
10
Duostim protocol: 45% cumulative LBR two cycles/month (2021)
11
Natural cycle IVF: 15-20% LBR per cycle young women (2020 review)
12
Mini-IVF low dose: 42% LBR similar cost-effective (clinic data)
13
Segmental biopsy PGT: 65% ongoing pregnancy/ET (2021)
14
Vitrification vs slow freeze: 55% vs 25% survival FET (ESHRE)
15
Time-lapse imaging: 5-10% higher LBR embryos selected (meta 2020)
16
AH artificial hatching: 48% LBR thick zona vs 52% no (RCT 2019)
17
Growth hormone adjunct: 28% LBR poor responders vs 18% (meta)
18
DHEA supplementation: 23% higher LBR diminished reserve (2021)
19
CoQ10 antioxidant: 15% improved LBR >35yo (RCT 2020)
20
Low progesterone FET: 30% miscarriage increase (2022 study)
21
IMSI selection sperm: 52% LBR severe male factor vs 45%
22
PICSI hyaluronan sperm: 48% vs 42% LBR male infertility
23
EmbryoGlue medium: 55% implantation vs 48% standard (meta)
24
Depot GnRH antagonist: 42% LBR vs 38% daily (2021)
25
Mild OHSS protocol: 40% LBR safe high responders
Interpretation
Treatment Protocol Interpretation
While the quest for a baby can feel like a dizzying statistical maze, the data quietly advises that success often lies not in one magical trick, but in the careful, personalized assembly of many small, evidence-backed advantages—from a frozen embryo to a precisely timed transfer—each one stacking the odds ever so slightly in your favor.
Reference
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
APA
Kevin O'Brien. (2026, February 13). Ivf Success Rates Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/ivf-success-rates-statistics
MLA
Kevin O'Brien. "Ivf Success Rates Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/ivf-success-rates-statistics.
Chicago
Kevin O'Brien. 2026. "Ivf Success Rates Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/ivf-success-rates-statistics.
Sources & references
52 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level