While intimate partner violence is often described as an epidemic, the staggering statistics reveal a devastating global pandemic, with a shocking 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men in the U.S. experiencing severe physical violence from a partner in their lifetime.
Key Takeaways
- In the United States, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men will experience severe physical violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime
- Globally, as many as 38% of all murders of women are committed by intimate partners
- In the US, 41% of women and 26% of men have experienced some form of coercive control by an intimate partner
- Among US women, 47.3% have experienced psychological aggression by intimate partner
- Black women in US experience IPV at 43.7% lifetime rate, compared to 34.4% white women
- Hispanic women in US have 36.1% lifetime physical IPV prevalence
- Among US men, bisexual men have 27.5% lifetime physical IPV
- 97% of domestic abusers control victims financially
- Male perpetrators account for 85% of reported IPV arrests in US
- IPV causes 18.2% of major injuries to adult women in US ERs
- 42% of IPV victims suffer physical injury requiring medical care
- IPV linked to 50% increased risk of stroke in women
- US shelters turn away 57% of IPV victims due to lack of space
- Only 34% of US IPV victims contact police
- Batterer intervention programs reduce recidivism by 33%
IPV is a widespread and devastating global crisis affecting millions.
Consequences and Impacts
- IPV causes 18.2% of major injuries to adult women in US ERs
- 42% of IPV victims suffer physical injury requiring medical care
- IPV linked to 50% increased risk of stroke in women
- Annual US medical costs for IPV: $5.8 billion
- 37% of IPV homicide victims are killed when attempting to leave
- IPV increases depression risk 2x in victims
- 40-45% of women with IPV history develop PTSD
- IPV during pregnancy causes 17% low birth weight risk
- Suicide attempt risk 3.5x higher in IPV victims
- 85% of IPV victims miss work (average 8 days/year)
- IPV accounts for 15% of violent crime in US
- Chronic pain reported by 80% of long-term IPV survivors
- Alcohol dependence 2-3x higher in IPV victims
- 30% of IPV victims experience homelessness
- Heart disease risk 70% higher in battered women
- 67% of IPV victims lose jobs due to absenteeism
- Children witnessing IPV 3x more behavioral problems
- IPV survivors 52% more likely to use welfare services
- Arthritis risk 60% higher in IPV victims
- 25% of suicide deaths among women linked to IPV
- Global economic cost of IPV: 1.5-2% of GDP
- US IPV causes $8.3 billion in lifetime earnings loss
- 55% of mental health service users are IPV victims
- Central nervous system disorders 1.5x in IPV survivors
- 20% of IPV victims develop fibromyalgia
- Reproductive health issues in 25% of IPV pregnancies
- 90% of shelter residents are IPV victims
- IPV linked to 28% preterm delivery risk
Consequences and Impacts Interpretation
The stark reality of intimate partner violence is that it weaves a devastating tapestry across every facet of a victim's life, from the immediate physical trauma in emergency rooms to the profound, lifelong echoes of chronic illness, economic ruin, and shattered mental health that collectively bleed into our communities and economies.
Interventions and Responses
- US shelters turn away 57% of IPV victims due to lack of space
- Only 34% of US IPV victims contact police
- Batterer intervention programs reduce recidivism by 33%
- Hotline calls to National DV Hotline: 361,760 in 2022
- Protective orders issued in 1.5 million US IPV cases annually
- Evidence-based IPV screening in healthcare increases identification by 64%
- US VAWA funding: $4.5 billion since 1994 for IPV services
- Mandatory arrest policies reduce IPV by 20-30% short-term
- Therapy for child witnesses reduces trauma symptoms by 50%
- Gun removal laws reduce IPV homicide by 10%
- IPV education in schools reduces acceptance by 40%
- Support groups improve victim safety planning 75%
- Forensic nursing exams aid conviction rates by 80%
- Risk assessment tools predict lethality 70% accurately
- Housing programs for IPV victims reduce recidency 50%
- Online safety planning apps used by 25% of tech-savvy victims
- Collaborative court programs lower re-arrests by 25%
- Economic empowerment programs cut IPV 30%
- Telehealth counseling reaches 40% more rural victims
- Bystander intervention training reduces assaults 20%
- Faith-based programs serve 15% of IPV victims
- Lethality assessments implemented in 40 US states
- Victim service referrals from police up 50% with protocols
- Animal welfare laws protect 30% more families
- International treaties like CEDAW cover IPV in 189 countries
- Mobile apps for safety planning downloaded 1M+ times
- Prosecutor-led fatality reviews prevent 15% future homicides
Interventions and Responses Interpretation
Even as we create tools that show promising precision in chipping away at the edges of intimate partner violence—from apps to assessments—the stark, systemic failures remain: we're still building a leaky boat with excellent navigation software while over half of those drowning are turned away from the dock.
Perpetrator Characteristics
- Among US men, bisexual men have 27.5% lifetime physical IPV
- 97% of domestic abusers control victims financially
- Male perpetrators account for 85% of reported IPV arrests in US
- Perpetrators with alcohol use disorder perpetrate IPV 8-13x more
- 40-60% of men who abuse partners also abuse children
- US perpetrators aged 18-34 commit 50% of IPV homicides
- 80% of IPV perpetrators have criminal history
- Male IPV perpetrators often have insecure attachment styles (60%)
- Perpetrators with depression perpetrate severe IPV 3x more
- 50% of female perpetrators were victims of child abuse
- Unemployed male perpetrators 2.5x more likely to abuse
- 70% of stalking perpetrators are intimate partners, mostly male
- Perpetrators using strangulation in IPV 10% of cases, often escalate to homicide
- 92% of IPV homicides by gun are by male partners
- Childhood trauma in perpetrators increases IPV risk 3-4x
- Male batterers exhibit jealousy in 92% of cases
- 60% of perpetrators re-abuse after separation
- Perpetrators with PTSD perpetrate IPV 2x rate
- Low-education perpetrators more likely to use severe violence (45%)
- 75% of perpetrators minimize or deny abuse
- Female perpetrators more likely psychological aggression (55%)
- Perpetrators in military 5x more likely to commit IPV
- 85% of IPV with animal abuse involves male perpetrators
- Perpetrators with substance abuse perpetrate 40-60% of cases
- Serial IPV perpetrators average 6 victims lifetime
Perpetrator Characteristics Interpretation
The stark statistics paint an undeniable and interlinked portrait of intimate partner violence as a crisis often rooted in male-perpetrated patterns of control, trauma, substance abuse, and a criminal escalation that society tragically fails to intercept.
Prevalence Rates
- In the United States, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men will experience severe physical violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime
- Globally, as many as 38% of all murders of women are committed by intimate partners
- In the US, 41% of women and 26% of men have experienced some form of coercive control by an intimate partner
- Approximately 10 million people in the US are victims of domestic violence each year
- Lifetime prevalence of physical IPV among US women is 31.1%
- In Europe, 22% of women have experienced physical and/or sexual violence from a partner
- In India, 29.3% of ever-married women aged 15-49 reported experiencing physical or sexual violence from husbands
- US men experience IPV at a rate of 29.3% lifetime prevalence for physical violence
- In Australia, 23% of women and 12% of men have experienced physical violence from a partner since age 15
- Globally, 736 million women have experienced intimate partner violence
- In the US, 48.4% of women and 48.8% of men have experienced psychological aggression by an intimate partner
- In Canada, 44% of women and 40% of men reported experiencing IPV
- In South Africa, 27.6% of women reported physical or sexual IPV in the past 12 months
- US stalking by intimate partners affects 9.2% of women and 2.5% of men lifetime
- In the UK, 1 in 5 women and 1 in 20 men have experienced partner abuse
- In Brazil, 10.6% of women experienced severe physical violence by partner annually
- Lifetime IPV prevalence for US bisexual women is 61.1%
- In Mexico, 43.9% of women aged 15+ have experienced IPV
- In the US, 35.6% of women raped by an intimate partner first time before age 18
- Globally, 30% of women aged 15+ have experienced physical/sexual IPV
- In the US, 19% of domestic violence involves a weapon
- In New Zealand, 32% of women and 20% of men report lifetime partner physical assault
- In Egypt, 31.9% of ever-married women experienced spousal violence
- US annual IPV victimization rate is 4 per 1,000 persons age 12+
- In Japan, 22.3% of women experienced partner violence
- In Russia, 40% of women suffer domestic violence
- Lifetime sexual violence by intimate partner in US women: 18.3%
- In Turkey, 38% of women experienced physical violence from husband
- In the Philippines, 25% of women aged 15-49 experienced physical violence by partner
- In the US, 81% of pregnancy-related deaths from homicide are IPV-related
Prevalence Rates Interpretation
These statistics are not a collection of distant numbers but a global epidemic hiding in plain sight, where 'home' is statistically the most dangerous place for a woman to be.
Victim Demographics
- Among US women, 47.3% have experienced psychological aggression by intimate partner
- Black women in US experience IPV at 43.7% lifetime rate, compared to 34.4% white women
- Hispanic women in US have 36.1% lifetime physical IPV prevalence
- US women aged 18-24 have highest IPV rate at 13.9 per 1,000
- Lesbian women in US report 43.8% lifetime IPV
- Globally, adolescent girls 15-19 experience 11% IPV prevalence
- In US, 1 in 6 women has experienced attempted or completed rape by intimate partner
- Indigenous women in US experience murder by intimate partner at 10x national average
- US women with disabilities experience IPV 40% more than non-disabled
- In low-income US households, IPV victimization is 2x higher
- Elderly women over 60 in US have 8.9% IPV prevalence
- Transgender women experience IPV at 44% lifetime rate
- Rural US women face 1.6x higher IPV homicide risk
- US immigrant women report IPV at 48.4% rate
- Bisexual women in US have 61.1% lifetime stalking victimization by partner
- Pregnant women in US experience IPV at 3-9% during pregnancy
- US college women experience IPV at 27% rate
- Women with children under 12 experience 1.4x more IPV
- In US military women, IPV prevalence is 28%
- Low-education US women (<HS) have 42% IPV rate
- US women in same-sex relationships report 39% IPV
- Middle-aged US women (35-49) peak IPV at 37.3%
- US Asian women underreport IPV but prevalence ~19%
- Women with PTSD history have 3x IPV risk
- US homeless women experience IPV at 63% rate
- 35% of US women first IPV before age 18
Victim Demographics Interpretation
This distressing constellation of data, where a woman's risk of intimate partner violence in America seems to intensify at nearly every intersection of identity, circumstance, and age, paints a portrait of a national epidemic that is not an anomaly but a pervasive feature of our society.
Sources & References
- Reference 1CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 2WHOwho.intVisit source
- Reference 3NCADVncadv.orgVisit source
- Reference 4DOMESTICVIOLENCERESEARCHdomesticviolenceresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 5FRAfra.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 6DHSPROGRAMdhsprogram.comVisit source
- Reference 7NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 8ABSabs.gov.auVisit source
- Reference 9UNWOMENunwomen.orgVisit source
- Reference 10JUSTICEjustice.gc.caVisit source
- Reference 11SAMRCsamrc.ac.zaVisit source
- Reference 12GOVgov.ukVisit source
- Reference 13THELANCETthelancet.comVisit source
- Reference 14ENDVAWNOWendvawnow.orgVisit source
- Reference 15TEARAteara.govt.nzVisit source
- Reference 16BJSbjs.ojp.govVisit source
- Reference 17GENDERgender.go.jpVisit source
- Reference 18UNODCunodc.orgVisit source
- Reference 19DATAdata.unwomen.orgVisit source
- Reference 20URBANurban.orgVisit source
- Reference 21NIJnij.ojp.govVisit source
- Reference 22NCEAncea.aoa.govVisit source
- Reference 23TRANSEQUALITYtransequality.orgVisit source
- Reference 24ACOGacog.orgVisit source
- Reference 25CLARKUclarku.eduVisit source
- Reference 26VAva.govVisit source
- Reference 27WILLIAMSINSTITUTEwilliamsinstitute.law.ucla.eduVisit source
- Reference 28PTSDptsd.va.govVisit source
- Reference 29VPCvpc.orgVisit source
- Reference 30EVERYTOWNRESEARCHeverytownresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 31DVSASdvsas.orgVisit source
- Reference 32NATIONALCASnationalcas.orgVisit source
- Reference 33SAMHSAsamhsa.govVisit source
- Reference 34THEHOTLINEthehotline.orgVisit source
- Reference 35USPREVENTIVESERVICESTASKFORCEuspreventiveservicestaskforce.orgVisit source
- Reference 36JUSTICEjustice.govVisit source
- Reference 37HUDhud.govVisit source
- Reference 38TECHSAFETYtechsafety.org.auVisit source
- Reference 39WORLDBANKworldbank.orgVisit source
- Reference 40GREENSDOTgreensdot.orgVisit source
- Reference 41FAMILYLIFEfamilylife.comVisit source
- Reference 42DASAFdasaf.orgVisit source
- Reference 43UNun.orgVisit source
- Reference 44ASPIREaspire.news21.comVisit source
- Reference 45NDVHndvh.orgVisit source