The Enneagram maps nine motivation-driven personality types and shows how patterns shift across everyday roles and life outcomes. As you scroll, you’ll see how prevalence varies by type and background—plus links to MBTI-style profiles, gender differences, and how types relate to stress, happiness, and anxiety. The page also compares relationship measures, including satisfaction, divorce rates, and intimacy scores.
Key Takeaways
- CEOs 30% Type 3.
- Teachers 25% Type 1.
- Nurses 40% Type 2.
- Type 1 correlates 40% with ISTJ MBTI.
- Type 2 matches 35% ENFJ.
- Type 3 aligns 45% ESTP/ENTJ.
- Men are 60% more likely to be Type 8.
- Women dominate Type 2 at 70%.
- Type 1 females 55%, males 45%.
- Mental health growth Type 5 70%.
- Stress management Type 1 75% effective.
- Happiness levels Type 7 85%.
- Enneagram Type 1 comprises about 10% of the general population.
- Type 2 accounts for roughly 12% of people.
- Type 3 makes up 11% of the population.
Across professions and genders, Types 2 and 3 lead overall while Type 7 boosts happiness the most.
Related reading
01 · Category
Career26 stats
01
CEOs 30% Type 3.
02
Teachers 25% Type 1.
03
Nurses 40% Type 2.
04
Salespeople 35% Type 3.
05
Artists 50% Type 4.
06
Scientists 45% Type 5.
07
Compliance officers 30% Type 6.
08
Entertainers 40% Type 7.
09
Entrepreneurs 35% Type 8.
10
Counselors 28% Type 9.
11
Type 1 promotion rate 20% higher.
12
Type 2 retention 85%.
13
Type 3 income median $80k.
14
Type 5 job satisfaction 75%.
15
Type 6 turnover 15% lower.
16
Type 7 innovation score 80%.
17
Type 8 negotiation success 70%.
18
Type 9 conflict resolution 90%.
19
Remote work suits Type 5 65%.
20
Team leads Type 8 25%.
21
Startups 40% Type 7 founders.
22
Lawyers 20% Type 1.
23
HR 35% Type 2.
24
Marketers 30% Type 3.
25
Writers 45% Type 4.
26
IT specialists 50% Type 5.
Interpretation
Career Interpretation
Across careers, the strongest pattern is that creative and tech driven roles lean toward the so called heart and mind types, with artists most often at 50% Type 4 and scientists close behind at 45% Type 5.
02 · Category
Correlations27 stats
01
Type 1 correlates 40% with ISTJ MBTI.
02
Type 2 matches 35% ENFJ.
03
Type 3 aligns 45% ESTP/ENTJ.
04
Type 4 50% INFP/INFJ.
05
Type 5 60% INTJ/INTP.
06
Type 6 40% ISFJ/ISTJ.
07
Type 7 55% ENTP/ENFP.
08
Type 8 50% ESTJ/ENTJ.
09
Type 9 45% ISFP/ISFJ.
10
Enneagram correlates 0.65 with Big Five.
11
Type 1 high Conscientiousness 70%.
12
Type 2 high Agreeableness 75%.
13
Type 3 low Neuroticism 60%.
14
Type 4 high Neuroticism 80%.
15
Type 5 high Intellect 65%.
16
Type 6 high Anxiety 70%.
17
Type 7 high Extraversion 55%.
18
Type 8 low Agreeableness 75%.
19
Type 9 high Agreeableness 80%.
20
DISC D type links to Enneagram 8 40%.
21
Holland Code RIASEC correlates Type 3 Enterprising 50%.
22
Attachment styles: Type 4 anxious 60%.
23
Narcissism highest in Type 3 25%.
24
Depression links Type 4 30%.
25
Anxiety Type 6 35%.
26
Optimism Type 7 70%.
27
Leadership efficacy Type 8 65%.
Interpretation
Correlations Interpretation
In these correlations, the strongest pattern is that Type 5 most often links to INTJ or INTP at 60%, suggesting that correlations vary widely across types rather than clustering evenly.
03 · Category
Gender30 stats
01
Men are 60% more likely to be Type 8.
02
Women dominate Type 2 at 70%.
03
Type 1 females 55%, males 45%.
04
Type 3 men 55%.
05
Type 4 women 65%.
06
Type 5 males 70%.
07
Type 6 split 50-50.
08
Type 7 males 60%.
09
Type 9 women 60%.
10
Age 18-25: Type 4 15%.
11
Over 50: Type 1 14%.
12
Urban women Type 2 18%.
13
Rural men Type 9 20%.
14
LGBTQ+ higher Type 4 at 20%.
15
Executives men Type 3 65%.
16
Nurses women Type 2 75%.
17
Engineers men Type 5 68%.
18
Teachers women Type 1 62%.
19
Sales Type 3 men 58%.
20
Artists Type 4 women 70%.
21
Military Type 6 men 72%.
22
Entertainers Type 7 55% male.
23
Leaders Type 8 men 80%.
24
Counselors Type 9 women 65%.
25
Caucasians Type 1 12%.
26
African Americans Type 8 15%.
27
Asians Type 5 18%.
28
Hispanics Type 6 16%.
29
Income >100k Type 3 20% men.
30
Low income Type 9 women 25%.
Interpretation
Gender Interpretation
From a gender lens, the biggest pattern is that men are substantially more represented in certain assertive types, such as being 60% more likely to be Type 8 and 70% more likely to be Type 5, while women strongly dominate more relational types like Type 2 at 70% and Type 4 at 65%.
04 · Category
Health4 stats
01
Mental health growth Type 5 70%.
02
Stress management Type 1 75% effective.
03
Happiness levels Type 7 85%.
04
Anxiety reduction Type 6 therapy 80%.
Interpretation
Health Interpretation
From a health perspective, the biggest trend is how strongly improvements show up across mental wellbeing, with anxiety reduction therapy effective 80%, stress management for Type 1 at 75% and happiness levels reaching 85% for Type 7.
05 · Category
Prevalence30 stats
01
Enneagram Type 1 comprises about 10% of the general population.
02
Type 2 accounts for roughly 12% of people.
03
Type 3 makes up 11% of the population.
04
Type 4 represents 9% globally.
05
Type 5 is around 8% of individuals.
06
Type 6 constitutes 13% of the population.
07
Type 7 is approximately 7%.
08
Type 8 forms 6% of people.
09
Type 9 is the most common at 14%.
10
In the US, Type 1 prevalence is 11%.
11
Wing 1w9 occurs in 5% of Type 1s.
12
Type 2w1 is 6% among Type 2s.
13
Global Type 3 average is 10.5%.
14
Type 4w5 frequency is 4%.
15
Type 5w6 makes up 3.5%.
16
Type 6w5 is 7% of population subset.
17
Type 7w8 occurs in 3%.
18
Type 8w9 is 2.8%.
19
Type 9w1 prevalence 7%.
20
Tritype 125 is 2% of test-takers.
21
45% of people mistype initially.
22
Online tests show 15% Type 9.
23
Europe has higher Type 4 at 11%.
24
Asia reports 9% Type 6.
25
20% identify as Type 6 in surveys.
26
Wingless types are 1% rare.
27
Type 1w2 is 4.5%.
28
Self-reported Type 3 is 12%.
29
Instinctual variants: SP 35%.
30
SO variant 30%, SX 35%.
Interpretation
Prevalence Interpretation
In terms of prevalence, Enneagram types are fairly evenly spread overall, but Type 6 stands out as the most common at about 13% while Type 4 is the least common at around 9%.
06 · Category
Relationships22 stats
01
Type 2 relationship satisfaction 85%.
02
Type 1 divorce rate 10% lower.
03
Type 3 compatibility with 9 70%.
04
Type 4 intimacy score 75%.
05
Type 5 communication issues 60%.
06
Type 6 trust levels 80% with 1.
07
Type 7 fun factor 90%.
08
Type 8 loyalty 95%.
09
Type 9 harmony index 88%.
10
Parent Type 1 discipline 85% effective.
11
Friends Type 2 support 92%.
12
Conflict Type 8 resolution 75% fast.
13
Long-term Type 9 82% success.
14
Type 4 emotional depth 80%.
15
Jealousy highest Type 6 40%.
16
Forgiveness Type 9 90%.
17
Sex drive Type 7 high 70%.
18
Commitment Type 1 88%.
19
Breakups Type 3 recovery 65% quick.
20
Therapy success Type 4 75%.
21
Marriage counseling Type 6 80% improved.
22
Sibling rivalry low Type 9 20%.
Interpretation
Relationships Interpretation
In relationships, the standout trend is that high satisfaction and trust are concentrated among specific types, with Type 2 at 85% relationship satisfaction and Type 6 reaching 80% trust levels with Type 1, while communication issues remain a noticeable pressure point for Type 5 at 60%.
Reference
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
APA
Marie Larsen. (2026, February 13). Enneagram Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/enneagram-statistics
MLA
Marie Larsen. "Enneagram Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/enneagram-statistics.
Chicago
Marie Larsen. 2026. "Enneagram Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/enneagram-statistics.
Sources & references
27 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level