Key Takeaways
- In 2024, the National Conference of State Legislatures identifies Electoral College allocation methods and state rules (including Maine and Nebraska)
- As of 2024, a number of states have enacted laws to require electors to vote for the candidate their state chooses (a requirement structure that has been analyzed by CRS)
- The Electoral Count Act was codified at 3 U.S.C. §§ 5–18 and 3 U.S.C. §§ 19–24 prior to repeal and replacement by the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022
- In modern elections since 2000, the number of faithless electors has typically been fewer than 10 per cycle (National Archives FAQ: “faithless electors” are rare)
- In the 1876 election, 185 electoral votes were required to win (a majority of 369 electoral votes cast)
- Maine allocates 1 electoral vote per congressional district (with remaining electors allocated statewide)
- In the 2016 election, Donald Trump won the presidency despite losing the national popular vote by 2.1 percentage points
- The Electoral College has been criticized because election outcomes can diverge from the national popular vote; this divergence has occurred in 5 of the last 6 presidential elections (2000, 2004, 2008, 2016, 2020) as summarized by The Washington Post’s analysis
- Since 1900, the Electoral College has awarded the presidency to the candidate with fewer popular votes in 5 elections (documented in historical analyses)
- Cook Political Report’s Partisan Lean rankings quantify state competitiveness; their reported states per cycle include 7 battleground states rated toss-up/leans (as of a given election cycle)
- 538 is the total number of Electoral College votes available to cast in a presidential election
- 2 states—Maine and Nebraska—use congressional-district allocation for a portion of their Electoral College votes
- The Electoral College uses 48 state-based winner-take-all systems plus 2 district-based systems to translate state popular votes into electoral votes
Electoral College outcomes often diverge from the popular vote, with state rules and electors shaped by recent reforms.
Related reading
01 · Category
Legal & Policy8 stats
Legal & Policy Interpretation
02 · Category
Historical Margins2 stats
Historical Margins Interpretation
03 · Category
Allocation Rules1 stats
Allocation Rules Interpretation
More related reading
04 · Category
Vote Outcomes1 stats
Vote Outcomes Interpretation
05 · Category
Debate & Criticism3 stats
Debate & Criticism Interpretation
06 · Category
Institutional Rules14 stats
Institutional Rules Interpretation
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Alexander Schmidt. (2026, February 13). Electoral College Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/electoral-college-statistics
Alexander Schmidt. "Electoral College Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/electoral-college-statistics.
Alexander Schmidt. 2026. "Electoral College Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/electoral-college-statistics.
Sources & references
29 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level
+17 additional datasets cited (not shown individually)
