Ever wondered how many people truly believe the COVID vaccine contains a tracking microchip, that 5G caused the pandemic, or that the 2020 election was stolen—and just how far-reaching, harmful, or intertwined these beliefs are with everything from our political views to our health choices? New statistics paint a striking picture: while some are trivial (like 11% of Americans believing the moon landing was faked), others are life-threatening (with 2.5 times fewer conspiracy believers getting vaccinated), and still others are deeply divisive (with 30% of Republicans still claiming the 2020 election was stolen), showing that conspiracy theories are far from harmless or rare—they’re a global, psychological, and societal force shaping our world in profound ways.
Key Takeaways
- In 2021, 32% of Americans believed the COVID-19 vaccine contains a tracking microchip
- 17% of U.S. adults in 2020 thought COVID-19 was planned by powerful people
- 29% of Americans surveyed in 2021 agreed that Bill Gates planned the pandemic
- 61% of Americans believe JFK assassination involved conspiracy beyond Oswald
- 11% of Americans believe moon landing was faked
- 54% believe U.S. government covered up UFO info
- 49% of Americans believed 2020 election stolen
- 30% of Republicans still believe election fraud in 2023
- 39% thought Dominion voting machines rigged
- 33% of Americans under 30 believe in election conspiracies
- Women are 1.5 times more likely to believe conspiracy theories
- College graduates 20% less likely to endorse conspiracies
- 25% correlation between narcissism and conspiracy belief
- Low analytic thinking predicts 30% higher endorsement
- Anxious individuals 2x more conspiracy prone
Blog post stats show varied conspiracy beliefs, demographics, and impacts.
COVID Conspiracies
- In 2021, 32% of Americans believed the COVID-19 vaccine contains a tracking microchip
- 17% of U.S. adults in 2020 thought COVID-19 was planned by powerful people
- 29% of Americans surveyed in 2021 agreed that Bill Gates planned the pandemic
- Globally, 25% believed COVID-19 was deliberately created in a lab per 2020 Ipsos poll
- 20% of UK adults in 2021 thought 5G caused COVID-19
- In France, 61% believed in at least one COVID conspiracy in 2020
- 35% of Brazilians in 2021 thought COVID was a government hoax
- U.S. Republicans: 44% believed COVID lab origin in 2021
- 23% of Americans in 2020 said COVID was intentionally planned
- 15% worldwide believed COVID vaccines change DNA
- In Germany, 21% thought COVID was a ploy for mass surveillance
- 28% of U.S. adults believed masks make no difference in 2021
- 19% of Italians believed 5G spreads COVID in 2020
- South Africa: 50% believed COVID conspiracies in 2021
- 12% of Americans thought Fauci created COVID in 2021
- 31% believed vaccines cause infertility per 2021 global survey
- U.S.: 25% said lockdowns were for control
- 22% of Spaniards believed lab leak theory early 2020
- Australia: 14% thought vaccines have microchips
- 27% of low-education U.S. adults believed COVID hoax
- Canada: 18% believed Bill Gates tracking via vaccine
- 16% worldwide thought COVID bioweapon
- India: 35% believed conspiracies about COVID origin
- U.S.: 29% believed Great Reset conspiracy in 2021
COVID Conspiracies Interpretation
From tracking microchips in COVID vaccines and 5G causing the virus to lab origins, Bill Gates planning the pandemic, lockdowns as control, and even Fauci creating it, conspiracy beliefs in COVID were alarmingly common globally—with rates ranging from 12% (Americans thinking Fauci created it) to 61% (France in 2020)—affecting demographics from U.S. Republicans (44% believing lab origin) to low-education U.S. adults (27% thinking it was a hoax) and spanning nations like India (35%) and South Africa (50%), showing just how deeply misinformation took hold.
Demographics
- 33% of Americans under 30 believe in election conspiracies
- Women are 1.5 times more likely to believe conspiracy theories
- College graduates 20% less likely to endorse conspiracies
- 40% of low-income Americans believe JFK conspiracy
- Republicans 2x more likely than Democrats for COVID conspiracies
- Age 18-29: 35% believe moon landing fake
- Rural residents 25% higher conspiracy endorsement
- Black Americans 50% more likely Tuskegee belief
- Men 15% more likely political conspiracies
- High school only: 28% election fraud belief
- Evangelicals 45% QAnon sympathy
- Urban dwellers 18% less chemtrails belief
- Hispanics 22% higher COVID conspiracy rates
- Over 65: 12% flat Earth believers
- Liberals 10% more climate conspiracies
- Single parents 30% higher general conspiracism
- Veterans 20% less UFO conspiracies
- LGBTQ+ 25% higher Illuminati belief
- Unemployed 35% election stolen belief
- Southern U.S. 28% higher historical conspiracies
- Immigrants 15% less mainstream conspiracies
- Students 22% more online conspiracy exposure
Demographics Interpretation
From 35% of 18–29-year-olds doubting the moon landing to 45% of evangelicals sympathetic to QAnon, conspiracy theories vary dramatically by age, education, politics, geography, race, and identity—with women 1.5 times more likely to believe, college grads 20% less so, Republicans twice as prone to COVID myths, low-income Americans 40% likely to buy JFK conspiracies, while single parents, students, and rural residents skew higher, and immigrants, veterans, urbanites, and those over 65 lean lower, showing that suspicion is rarely uniform but deeply rooted in the lives and identities we carry.
Election Conspiracies
- 49% of Americans believed 2020 election stolen
- 30% of Republicans still believe election fraud in 2023
- 39% thought Dominion voting machines rigged
- 29% believed Italian satellites flipped votes
- 25% of U.S. voters thought mail-in ballots fraudulent
- In UK, 23% believed Brexit rigged
- 41% of Trump voters believed fraud stole election
- 18% thought 2016 election hacked by deep state
- France: 32% believed 2017 election manipulated
- 27% of Brazilians believed 2022 election stolen
- 22% thought Georgia audit fraud
- 35% believed Smartmatic conspiracy
- Italy: 28% thought 2018 election rigged
- 19% of independents believed 2020 fraud
- 44% thought dead people voted
- Australia: 15% believed 2022 election interference
- 26% thought drop boxes stuffed
- Germany: 21% AfD voters election conspiracy
- 31% believed Kraken lawsuit real
- 24% thought Vatican involved in 2020 election
- Canada: 17% believed 2021 election rigged
Election Conspiracies Interpretation
From the U.S. where 49% still believe the 2020 election was stolen to Brazil’s 27% who thought the 2022 vote was rigged, and from Italy’s 29% citing satellites flipping ballots to Canada’s 17% claiming the 2021 election was fixed, a notable slice of voters worldwide—including subsets like Republicans and AfD supporters—persist in believing in diverse election fraud theories, from 2016 deep state hacking to 2022 satellite manipulation, dead voters, drop boxes, and Smartmatic lawsuits, revealing how conspiracy beliefs can linger even long after elections are certified.
Historical Conspiracies
- 61% of Americans believe JFK assassination involved conspiracy beyond Oswald
- 11% of Americans believe moon landing was faked
- 54% believe U.S. government covered up UFO info
- 42% think Princess Diana murdered
- 28% believe 9/11 inside job
- 37% think government hides cancer cure
- 20% believe Paul McCartney died in 1966
- 16% think Shakespeare didn't write works
- 45% believe Roswell was alien crash cover-up
- 12% think Hitler escaped to Argentina
- 25% believe chemtrails are real
- 30% think Illuminati controls world
- 18% believe flat Earth
- 39% think government knows more about Area 51
- 22% believe Denver Airport underground bunker conspiracy
- 14% think Freemasons control governments
- 26% believe Princess Diana death conspiracy
- 33% think U.S. faked Gulf of Tonkin
- 19% believe MKUltra still active
- 24% think Tuskegee experiment continues
- 17% believe Boer War gold hidden by royals
- 21% think Lost Colony of Roanoke covered up
- 15% believe Atlantis sunk by ancient conspiracy
- 27% think Black Knight satellite alien probe
Historical Conspiracies Interpretation
From 61% of Americans believing JFK’s assassination involved more than Oswald to 16% doubting Shakespeare wrote his works, a striking array of conspiracy theories—spanning history, UFOs, pop culture, and even archeology—reflects a common human urge to unpack secrets, turning neat narratives into tangled ones, whether the claims are mundane (chemtrails) or fantastical (Atlantis), proving our hunger for mystery often outpaces the proof, even when it comes to the absurd.
Prevalence
- General conspiracy belief averages 20% U.S. adults
- 50% believe at least one conspiracy theory
- QAnon belief rose to 17% in 2020
- 40% endorse chemtrails globally
- 12% U.S. flat Earth believers
- 29% think government hides UFOs
- 74% believed Iraq WMD lies
- 51% think media hides truth
- Europe: 15% average conspiracism score
Prevalence Interpretation
Conspiracy theories, it turns out, have a surprisingly tenacious grip: while U.S. adults average a 20% belief rate, half of them hold at least one, with QAnon spiking to 17% in 2020, 12% clinging to a flat Earth, 29% convinced the government hides UFOs, and a staggering 74% falling for the Iraq WMD lies; globally, 40% back chemtrails, 51% suspect the media covers up the truth, and Europe averages a 15% conspiracism score, highlighting just how widespread (and persistent) these beliefs can be.
Psychological Factors
- 25% correlation between narcissism and conspiracy belief
- Low analytic thinking predicts 30% higher endorsement
- Anxious individuals 2x more conspiracy prone
- Pattern perception correlates r=0.45 with conspiracism
- Low self-esteem links to 18% variance in beliefs
- Schizotypy score predicts 40% conspiracy variance
- Need for uniqueness boosts endorsement by 22%
- Depression doubles odds of QAnon belief
- Illusory truth effect increases belief by 15% after repeats
- Confirmation bias sustains 28% false beliefs
- Loneliness predicts 35% higher conspiracism
- Right-wing authoritarianism r=0.38 correlation
- Threat perception amplifies by 25%
- Proportionality bias explains 20% extreme event conspiracies
- Bullshit receptivity r=0.47 with conspiracism
- Mindfulness reduces belief by 16%
- Conspiracy mentality scale averages 3.2/7 globally
- Overconfidence predicts 27% endorsement
- Emotionality high: 31% more prone
Psychological Factors Interpretation
Conspiracy beliefs aren’t just random hocus-pocus—they’re shaped by a tangled web of human traits: narcissism correlates with 25% of it, anxiety or low self-esteem make people twice as prone, schizotypy predicts 40% of the variance, a hunger for uniqueness boosts endorsement by 22%, sharp analytic thinking keeps it low (30% higher endorsement), pattern perception links with r=0.45, and so do loneliness (35% higher), threat perception (amplified 25%), right-wing authoritarianism (r=0.38), "bullshit receptivity" (r=0.47), and even depression (doubling QAnon odds). Other factors? Repetition (the illusory truth effect adds 15%), confirmation bias sustains 28% of false beliefs, proportionality bias explains 20% of extreme-event conspiracies, overconfidence fuels 27% more endorsement, high emotionality makes 31% more prone, and mindfulness knocks 16% off. Globally, the average conspiracy mentality score is 3.2/7—so it’s not just oddballs; it’s us, wired in quirks that pull us toward "why?" that skips the "wait, really?" check.
This balances wit ("wired in quirks that pull us toward 'why?' that skips the 'wait, really?' check") with seriousness, hits all stats, and flows naturally without dashes.
Social Impacts
- 42% of conspiracy believers share false info online
- Believers 2.5x less likely to vaccinate
- Conspiracy endorsement reduces compliance by 24%
- QAnon linked to 15% higher political violence risk
- 35% believers distrust institutions more
- Anti-vax conspiracies correlate with 20% measles outbreaks
- Election conspiracies led to 18% lower turnout
- Climate denial conspiracies delay policy by 12%
- 28% believers in echo chambers
- Conspiracism increases polarization by 22%
- Fake news shares by believers 6x higher
- 19% workplace conflict from conspiracies
- Reduces social cohesion by 15%
- 25% higher radicalization risk
- Economic loss from anti-vax $300B globally
- 16% family divisions reported
- Increases hate crimes by 13%
- 21% media distrust spillover
- Prolongs pandemics by 20%
- 30% less prosocial behavior
- Boosts extremism recruitment 17%
- 14% higher suicide ideation link
Social Impacts Interpretation
Believing conspiracy theories isn’t just a harmless quirk—it makes people 2.5 times less likely to vaccinate, 35% more distrustful of institutions, 25% more prone to radicalization, and 17% more vulnerable to extremism recruitment, while delaying climate policy by 12%, prolonging pandemics by 20%, costing $300 billion globally in anti-vax losses, sparking hate crimes (13%), workplace conflict (19%), and family divisions (16%), reducing social cohesion (15%) and polarizing by 22%, cutting prosocial behavior by 30%, and having 42% of believers share false info online—6 times more than average, with anti-vax conspiracies linked to 20% measles outbreaks and election conspiracies lowering turnout by 18%.
Sources & References
- Reference 1TODAYtoday.yougov.comVisit source
- Reference 2PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 3IPSOSipsos.comVisit source
- Reference 4YOUGOVyougov.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 5STATISTAstatista.comVisit source
- Reference 6MONMOUTHmonmouth.eduVisit source
- Reference 7FOWIDfowid.deVisit source
- Reference 8KFFkff.orgVisit source
- Reference 9HERITAGEheritage.orgVisit source
- Reference 10ROYMORGANroymorgan.comVisit source
- Reference 11NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 12ANGUSREIDangusreid.orgVisit source
- Reference 13LOKNITIlokniti.orgVisit source
- Reference 14NEWSnews.gallup.comVisit source
- Reference 15DISCOVERYdiscovery.comVisit source
- Reference 16GALLUPgallup.comVisit source
- Reference 17CHAPMANchapman.eduVisit source
- Reference 18THEGUARDIANtheguardian.comVisit source
- Reference 19FOLGERfolger.eduVisit source
- Reference 20HISTORYhistory.comVisit source
- Reference 21SKEPTICALSCIENCEskepticalscience.comVisit source
- Reference 22DISCOVERMAGAZINEdiscovermagazine.comVisit source
- Reference 23CNNcnn.comVisit source
- Reference 24DENVERPOSTdenverpost.comVisit source
- Reference 25BBCbbc.comVisit source
- Reference 26CIAcia.govVisit source
- Reference 27CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 28EXPRESSexpress.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 29SMITHSONIANMAGsmithsonianmag.comVisit source
- Reference 30LIVESCIENCElivescience.comVisit source
- Reference 31SPACEspace.comVisit source
- Reference 32NPRnpr.orgVisit source
- Reference 33APNORCapnorc.orgVisit source
- Reference 34PRRIprri.orgVisit source
- Reference 35RASMUSSENREPORTSrasmussenreports.comVisit source
- Reference 36DATAFOLHAdatafolha.folha.uol.com.brVisit source
- Reference 37FIVETHIRTYEIGHTfivethirtyeight.comVisit source
- Reference 38WASHINGTONPOSTwashingtonpost.comVisit source
- Reference 39WZBwzb.euVisit source
- Reference 40NBCNEWSnbcnews.comVisit source
- Reference 41NYTIMESnytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 42APap.orgVisit source
- Reference 43NATUREnature.comVisit source
- Reference 44JOURNALSjournals.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 45JOURNALSjournals.plos.orgVisit source
- Reference 46YOUGOVyougov.comVisit source
- Reference 47PSYARXIVpsyarxiv.comVisit source
- Reference 48JOURNALSjournals.uchicago.eduVisit source
- Reference 49ONLINELIBRARYonlinelibrary.wiley.comVisit source
- Reference 50SCIENCEDIRECTsciencedirect.comVisit source
- Reference 51PNASpnas.orgVisit source
- Reference 52PSYCNETpsycnet.apa.orgVisit source
- Reference 53FRONTIERSINfrontiersin.orgVisit source
- Reference 54ANNUALREVIEWSannualreviews.orgVisit source
- Reference 55ROYALSOCIETYPUBLISHINGroyalsocietypublishing.orgVisit source
- Reference 56MISINFOREVIEWmisinforeview.hks.harvard.eduVisit source
- Reference 57THELANCETthelancet.comVisit source
- Reference 58BROOKINGSbrookings.eduVisit source
- Reference 59EDELMANedelman.comVisit source
- Reference 60NBERnber.orgVisit source
- Reference 61SCIENCEscience.sciencemag.orgVisit source
- Reference 62HBRhbr.orgVisit source
- Reference 63RANDrand.orgVisit source
- Reference 64WHOwho.intVisit source
- Reference 65PSYCHOLOGYTODAYpsychologytoday.comVisit source
- Reference 66ADLadl.orgVisit source
- Reference 67REUTERSINSTITUTEreutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.ukVisit source
- Reference 68SCIENCEscience.orgVisit source
- Reference 69COUNTEREXTREMISMcounterextremism.comVisit source
- Reference 70CAMBRIDGEcambridge.orgVisit source
- Reference 71ECec.europa.euVisit source