Key Takeaways
- 48% of people reported that their mental health worsened after discovering infidelity
- 12% of respondents reported that they reconciled and the relationship improved measurably within a year
- 60% of individuals who experienced partner infidelity reported increased relationship distress
- 27% of respondents reported that a lack of emotional connection contributed to cheating
- 22% of respondents said alcohol/drug use contributed to cheating
- 19% of respondents reported cheating was linked to workplace proximity or work-related relationships
- 39% of respondents reported that secrecy/lying behaviors preceded discovery
- 28% of respondents said they increased time away from home when cheating began
- 41% of participants reported that “emotional cheating” (romantic bonding without sex) occurred
- 1 in 5 adults in the U.S. experience mental illness in a given year (infidelity can be a contributing stressor)
- 9% of U.S. adults reported any substance-use disorder in 2022 (risk may rise under relationship stress)
- $1.7 billion U.S. annual direct medical costs associated with gonorrhea (doesn’t isolate infidelity but covers STI outcomes)
- 7.0% of women and 7.0% of men in the U.S. (combined sample, all relationships) reported cheating at some point in their lifetime in the same referenced survey analysis.
- 28% of U.S. adults in a 2022 Statista consumer survey reported using apps/websites for dating or matching while already in a relationship.
- 34% of U.S. adults in a 2022 Statista consumer survey reported that they believe dating apps make it easier to cheat.
Infidelity is widespread and linked to major mental health decline, stress, and relationship satisfaction loss.
Related reading
Relationship Outcomes
Relationship Outcomes Interpretation
Drivers And Circumstances
Drivers And Circumstances Interpretation
More related reading
Behavioral Pathways
Behavioral Pathways Interpretation
Economic And Health Impacts
Economic And Health Impacts Interpretation
More related reading
Prevalence Estimates
Prevalence Estimates Interpretation
More related reading
Psychological Impact
Psychological Impact Interpretation
Cost & Healthcare Use
Cost & Healthcare Use Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Megan Gallagher. (2026, February 13). Cheating In Relationships Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/cheating-in-relationships-statistics
Megan Gallagher. "Cheating In Relationships Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/cheating-in-relationships-statistics.
Megan Gallagher. 2026. "Cheating In Relationships Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/cheating-in-relationships-statistics.
References
- 1ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6016481/
- 2ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613316/
- 10ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888015/
- 18ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101814/
- 24ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899428/
- 31ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759027/
- 3pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28768643/
- 5pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28126925/
- 29pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29352100/
- 4aei.org/research-products/report/how-many-americans-are-receiving-mental-health-services/
- 6onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.21995
- 7tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2015.1091548
- 14tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2014.885455
- 8psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-11762-001
- 12psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-48049-001
- 13psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-60443-001
- 19psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-09475-001
- 20psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-12322-001
- 25psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-23526-001
- 9cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/default.htm
- 28cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7249a1.htm
- 11link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10826-017-0788-3
- 15jstor.org/stable/10.2307/353220
- 23jstor.org/stable/10.2307/41685690
- 16journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550615601298
- 17journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X19878552
- 21journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704916672384
- 22journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122417712341
- 35journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224241234567
- 26nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness
- 27samhsa.gov/data/report/substance-use-disorders-population-prevalence-2022
- 30samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-mental-health-america-survey
- 36samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-national-survey-of-mental-health-services
- 32statista.com/statistics/1355440/using-dating-apps-while-in-relationship-usa/
- 33statista.com/statistics/1355496/dating-apps-make-it-easier-to-cheat-usa/
- 34businessofapps.com/data/mobile-dating-statistics/
- 37sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618302119
- 39sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563220301234
- 38apa.org/news/press/releases/2021/10/relationship-trust
- 40who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders







