Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Entertainment Events

Top 10 Best Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software of 2026

Compare virtual shareholder meeting software options for governance teams, with practical tradeoffs to shortlist the right fit for meetings.

32 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Virtual shareholder meeting software matters because governance teams must provision secure meeting sessions, manage proxy and voting flows, and retain audit logs across hybrid participation. This comparison is built for corporate operators and technical evaluators who need to weigh workflow automation depth against integration options like API and extensibility, using one reference point such as Diligent for governance-first deployments.

Q4 is the best pick for corporate IR teams needing one meeting portal with moderated Q&A, because its dual-language captioning is built into the live webcast for multilingual accessibility, whereas OnBoard fits enterprise meeting ops that want controlled Q&A and portal workflows with operator-accessible meeting archives for accountability.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Q4

Dual-language captioning integrated into the live webcast experience for accessibility across multilingual shareholder audiences.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams need a single meeting portal with moderated Q&A, multilingual accessibility, and enterprise SSO governance.

2

OnBoard

Editor pick

Meeting archive retention with operator-accessible review materials for post-session accountability.

Best for: Fits when corporate meeting ops need controlled Q&A and portal workflows without deep in-house voting tooling.

3

Donnelley Financial Solutions

Editor pick

Run-of-show oriented meeting operations that coordinates portal, live Q&A moderation, and vote closeout into inspector-ready outputs.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams need repeatable virtual meeting execution with governance and proxy-lifecycle continuity.

Comparison Table

1
Q4Best overall
mid-market
9.5/10
Overall
2
enterprise
8.7/10
Overall
3
8.6/10
Overall
4
enterprise
8.5/10
Overall
5
enterprise
8.2/10
Overall
6
enterprise
7.9/10
Overall
7
enterprise
7.6/10
Overall
8
7.2/10
Overall
9
6.9/10
Overall
10
enterprise
6.6/10
Overall
#1

Q4

mid-market

Investor relations platform offering virtual events, webcasting, and shareholder engagement analytics.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.5/10
Ease of Use9.5/10
Value9.5/10
Standout feature

Dual-language captioning integrated into the live webcast experience for accessibility across multilingual shareholder audiences.

Q4 (q4inc.com) runs virtual shareholder meetings with a portal that combines live meeting access, document materials, and participation tools in one workflow. The system supports proxy statement and meeting content publishing, a moderated Q&A flow, and election handling for votes submitted during the meeting.

Q4 also provides identity and participation controls used for shareholder access, plus configuration for multilingual experiences such as dual-language captioning. For corporate meeting teams, Q4 can be operated with SSO via SAML and governed access through role-based permissions and admin auditability.

Pros
  • +Moderated Q&A workflow supports controlled participation during live sessions
  • +SAML SSO reduces friction for enterprise identity management
  • +Multilingual captioning supports consistent accessibility for global meetings
  • +Meeting portal centralizes materials, participation, and election actions
Cons
  • –Complex pre-meeting setup can require careful coordination across stakeholders
  • –Some advanced vote and tabulation scenarios depend on configuration support
  • –Custom meeting workflows may require vendor involvement for edge cases
  • –Capacity and webcast latency controls need governance for high-throughput events
Use scenarios
  • Corporate governance teams

    Run remote annual meeting workflows

    Structured meeting execution records

  • Shareholder administration teams

    Manage equity event portal instructions

    Traceable equity event processing

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Investor relations teams

    Publish recurring quarterly shareholder materials

    Consistent quarterly publishing

    IR teams publish, archive, and distribute regular earnings materials with controlled shareholder access.

  • Investor website managers

    Maintain branded document libraries and hubs

    Controlled publishing experience

    Communications teams update investor pages, document libraries, results hubs, and event content without custom builds.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams need a single meeting portal with moderated Q&A, multilingual accessibility, and enterprise SSO governance.

#2

OnBoard

enterprise

Board management software with virtual annual meeting and voting workflows for shareholder and member meetings.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Meeting archive retention with operator-accessible review materials for post-session accountability.

OnBoard fits organizations that need repeatable meeting operations with centralized configuration for portal content, webcast settings, and participant experience rules. The tool’s core value is operational control during a live session, including how Q&A moderation and audience interaction are handled. It also supports meeting archiving so internal stakeholders can reference what was shown and discussed after adjournment.

A key tradeoff is that deeper proxy-specific integrations often require coordination with external voting and identity providers used by the organization. OnBoard works best when the meeting team can separate internal meeting configuration from upstream shareholder identity, voting distribution, and reconciliation processes. A strong usage situation is a corporate annual meeting where the operations group manages portal content and Q&A rules while other teams manage voting logistics.

Pros
  • +Strong meeting operations workflow for portal content and live session management
  • +Q&A moderation tools support controlled participant interaction
  • +Role-based access helps split duties between legal, ops, and communications
  • +Meeting archive supports post-meeting reference and internal review
Cons
  • –Proxy voting integrations can depend on external systems and project coordination
  • –Hybrid format setup requires additional configuration discipline across sessions
  • –Some governance controls are less granular for very large operator teams
  • –Identity and verification steps may fall outside the meeting operator workflow
Use scenarios
  • Corporate investor relations teams

    Annual meeting portal and Q&A handling

    Fewer last-minute operational issues

  • Corporate meeting operations teams

    Repeatable webcast and moderation configuration

    Lower setup variance across meetings

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Legal and corporate secretariat teams

    Post-meeting artifact review

    Faster internal record retrieval

    Legal reviews archived session materials to support internal documentation and follow-ups.

  • Communications and IR content teams

    Coordinated meeting portal publishing

    Clear ownership of portal changes

    Content teams publish meeting materials using controlled operator access paths.

Best for: Fits when corporate meeting ops need controlled Q&A and portal workflows without deep in-house voting tooling.

#3

Donnelley Financial Solutions

enterprise

Singular platform providing financial reporting, proxy, and virtual shareholder meeting capabilities.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Run-of-show oriented meeting operations that coordinates portal, live Q&A moderation, and vote closeout into inspector-ready outputs.

Donnelley Financial Solutions supports corporate virtual shareholder meetings with an end-to-end meeting operations workflow, from portal and webcast launch to vote collection and meeting archive handling. The offering emphasizes operational controls around shareholder communications and meeting execution, including identity and eligibility checks tied to the proxy lifecycle.

Capabilities typically include proxy voting integration touchpoints, Q&A moderation workflow controls, and ballot tabulation outputs used for inspector-of-elections reporting. For teams running repeated annual meeting portal schedules, the value concentrates on process repeatability and governance during live meeting execution.

Pros
  • +Meeting workflow coverage spans portal, webcast, Q&A, and vote closeout outputs
  • +Operational governance controls support consistent execution across meeting cycles
  • +Designed for repeat corporate meeting operations with structured run-of-show handling
  • +Integration into proxy lifecycles supports downstream voting and tabulation continuity
Cons
  • –Setup depth can require coordination across meeting ops, legal, and proxy stakeholders
  • –Moderation and attendee controls may feel less granular than tools built for heavy customization
  • –Extensibility for unusual meeting formats can depend on implementation support
  • –Webcast operations and accessibility settings require careful pre-meeting configuration
Use scenarios
  • Corporate secretaries

    Execute virtual annual meetings end-to-end

    Governance-ready meeting outputs

  • Investor relations teams

    Track delivery for investor communications

    Documented access records

Show 2 more scenarios
  • SEC reporting teams

    Prepare recurring filing packages

    Traceable filing revisions

    Reporting teams use collaborative drafting, structured tagging, and controlled submission workflows for periodic filings.

  • Financial content operations

    Manage regulated document lifecycles

    Disciplined document tracking

    Financial teams run approvals, version control, and release readiness for recurring regulated documents.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams need repeatable virtual meeting execution with governance and proxy-lifecycle continuity.

#4

Sherpany

enterprise

Meeting management software with AGM support for secure agendas, documents, voting, and remote participation.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Structured Q&A moderation workflow inside the meeting portal supports clear handling from submission to moderated outputs.

Sherpany provides an annual meeting portal experience that combines registration and entry management with agenda delivery, participant communications, and live interaction modules used during the meeting window. The workflow includes managed Q&A handling so meeting operators can moderate questions and control what is answered live or deferred to follow-up. Corporate administrators get governance controls for access, meeting roles, and operational oversight across multiple meetings.

Pros
  • +Moderated Q&A workflow reduces operator load during live sessions
  • +Meeting portal consolidates voting, materials, and attendee participation
  • +Role-based administration supports separation of secretariat and ops duties
  • +Operational controls support repeatable meeting execution across cycles
Cons
  • –Pre-meeting configuration is heavy for teams running many simultaneous events
  • –Advanced automation requires integration work with external identity and voting systems
  • –Live moderation controls can feel constrained for highly customized meeting formats
  • –Portal configuration granularity increases training time for new operators
Use scenarios
  • Company secretariat teams

    Moderated Q&A for virtual-only meetings

    Cleaner live meeting control

  • Investor relations operations

    Single portal for materials delivery

    Lower attendee confusion

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Governance and compliance leads

    Controlled participation and operator roles

    Tighter meeting execution governance

    Governance leads assign roles and configure access boundaries for meeting operations staff.

  • Corporate meeting ops analysts

    Repeatable workflow across meetings

    Faster setup cycles

    Ops analysts standardize meeting setup so future meetings reuse configuration patterns and controls.

Best for: Fits when corporate secretariat and ops teams need controlled virtual meeting operations with moderated participation.

#5

Equiniti

enterprise

UK-based shareholder services provider offering virtual AGM and hybrid meeting capabilities.

8.2/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Structured moderator workflow for Q&A triage tied to meeting operations rather than ad-hoc chat handling.

Equiniti delivers virtual shareholder meeting software with corporate-grade workflows for meeting operations, voting, and participant management. The system is designed around governance controls for running meetings and handling shareholder communications, including structured Q&A moderation and session management.

Pros
  • +Operational workflow controls for meeting runs and moderator handling
  • +Configurable Q&A moderation workflow for controlled participant engagement
  • +Meeting archive and replay support for post-meeting transparency
  • +Strong focus on corporate governance requirements for voting governance
Cons
  • –Complex setup for governance roles and meeting configuration
  • –Advanced voting workflows can require integration planning with upstream systems
  • –Question and polling configuration depends on meeting staff training
  • –Limited clarity on extensibility options compared with API-first competitors
Use scenarios
  • Corporate governance teams

    Administer proxy voting processes

    Governed ballot administration

  • Shareholder services teams

    Maintain registers as holdings change

    Maintained shareholder register

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Investor communications teams

    Coordinate shareholder communications in workflows

    Centralized communications workflow

    Teams manage documents and service statuses in one operational workflow for shareholder-facing updates.

  • Issuer registry teams

    Issue and track electronic certificates

    Certificate activity tied to records

    Registry teams coordinate electronic certificate activity linked to shareholder transfers and position changes.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams need governance-focused meeting ops, moderated Q&A, and dependable archival for repeat AGM cycles.

#6

Cvent

enterprise

Event management platform with virtual event and webinar modules.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Event operations workflow model that ties meeting administration, engagement configuration, and reporting into one configurable execution flow.

Cvent supports virtual shareholder meeting programs with event-focused workflow tooling that maps agenda, registrations, and engagement into a single operational thread. Its integration surface is oriented around bringing meeting data in from upstream systems and pushing participation and reporting outputs back out for governance review.

Pros
  • +Strong event administration workflows for agenda, registration, and attendee management
  • +Clear administrative RBAC patterns for internal roles during meeting operations
  • +Integration and API surface supports data exchange with corporate systems
  • +Audit-oriented activity tracking supports internal governance reviews
Cons
  • –Shareholder meeting-specific governance workflows may require careful configuration
  • –Webcast engagement tooling can require integration work to match broker participation flows
Use scenarios
  • Corporate meeting teams

    Run hybrid and virtual meeting programs

    Coordinated experiences across audiences

  • Event sponsorship teams

    Administer sponsor participation and data

    Centralized participation workflows

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Hospitality event teams

    Plan banquet execution timelines

    Connected planning and execution

    Teams turn event records into timelines covering guest counts, room layouts, staffing, setup, service, and breakdown.

  • Program owners

    Collect moderated feedback submissions

    Accountable feedback intake

    Teams gather submissions tied to programs and route them through moderated review stages with administrative controls.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams want event-style operations plus integration and admin controls for virtual meetings.

#7

On24

enterprise

Virtual event and webinar platform used for investor and shareholder meetings.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.6/10
Ease of Use7.6/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Webcast-native event pages that support interactive Q&A moderation and replay-centered meeting archives in one workflow.

On24 differentiates with a webcast-first approach that carries into virtual shareholder meeting workflows, including event pages and interactive engagement. The solution supports live Q&A moderation and event interactivity designed for corporate investor audiences. On24 also provides meeting archive content and accessibility features aimed at replay and consumption after the session ends.

Pros
  • +Webcast-first event UX that makes shareholder meetings feel like structured broadcasts
  • +Built-in live Q&A moderation workflow for controlled investor interaction
  • +Replay archive support for post-meeting access and reuse
  • +Accessibility-oriented webcast features for broader viewer compliance
Cons
  • –Voting and ballot operations require tighter coupling to external proxy workflows
  • –Identity verification depth can depend on how the meeting is integrated end to end
  • –Feature coverage for inspector-of-elections workflows is not as centralized as some Diligent-style tools
  • –Admin governance is more complex when multiple event templates and audiences are used
Use scenarios
  • Virtual event teams

    Run multi-session meeting style programs

    Structured multi-session experiences

  • Corporate communications teams

    Coordinate moderated broadcast events

    Controlled broadcast participation

Show 2 more scenarios
  • B2B marketing teams

    Deliver recurring webinar-format briefings

    Repeatable engagement reporting

    Teams create repeatable live programs with registration, presenter controls, moderation, and post-event reporting.

  • Training and enablement teams

    Deliver tracked learning sessions with replay

    Trackable live and recorded learning

    Teams use webinar-style registration, engagement reporting, and replay for educational or enablement delivery.

Best for: Fits when investor relations teams need a webcast-native meeting experience with managed Q&A and strong replay.

#8

BigMarker

SMB

Webinar and virtual event platform with branding and attendee engagement tools.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Q&A moderation within the live event room lets hosts manage questions and control what reaches the panel.

BigMarker is a virtual shareholder meeting software option for corporate teams that run agenda-driven meetings with live video and moderated interaction. It supports managed event rooms, attendee registration workflows, and meeting-day controls that handle Q&A moderation and participant access.

Pros
  • +Q&A moderation tools support structured attendee questions during live sessions
  • +Event room controls centralize access and presenter management for meeting operations
  • +Registration and attendance workflows reduce manual coordination on meeting day
  • +Video delivery tooling supports webcast-style interactions for large audiences
Cons
  • –Proxy voting integration and ballot tabulation are not its primary native focus
  • –Advanced shareholder identity verification workflows require external processes
  • –Complex governance needs may increase operational work for meeting admins
  • –Accessibility and captioning controls depend on the specific webcast configuration
Use scenarios
  • Conference teams

    Publish branded virtual event pages

    Repeatable online execution

  • Event organizers

    Coordinate gated summit replays

    Centralized gated replay access

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Webinar producers

    Manage multi-presenter broadcasts

    Organized multi-host delivery

    Producers coordinate panels and speaker layouts with centralized moderation for live audience handling.

  • Marketing teams

    Operate recurring webinar campaigns

    Consistent webinar workflow

    Teams reuse event structures for registration, live engagement, and replay handling across repeated webinar programs.

Best for: Fits when corporate teams need moderated virtual meeting operations and webcast delivery, not full proxy tabulation.

#9

Diligent Virtual Shareholder Meeting

enterprise

Governance software vendor that offers virtual shareholder meeting tools alongside board and entity management products.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Moderated Q&A orchestration with operator controls tied to the meeting session flow.

Diligent Virtual Shareholder Meeting delivers a corporate virtual meeting portal that supports moderated Q&A, live vote collection, and meeting record tooling. Diligent pairs browser-based attendance with workflow controls for organizers, including structured voting flows and audit-oriented meeting management for shareholder communications.

Pros
  • +Moderated Q&A workflow supports structured questions and controlled participation
  • +Voting experience includes role-based controls for meeting operators
  • +Meeting administration tools help coordinate agenda, voting, and attendee actions
  • +Multilingual captioning options support accessibility for live viewing
Cons
  • –Operator setup requires careful runbook creation for smooth voting and Q&A
  • –Customization of attendee experience can feel limited versus fully custom portals
  • –Integration depth depends on connector selection and pre-meeting data readiness
  • –Large-scale event throughput can increase support requirements during peak moments
Use scenarios
  • Corporate legal and governance teams

    Moderate shareholder questions during annual meetings

    Cleaner transcripts and control

  • Investor relations operations

    Run consistent portal access for shareholders

    Repeatable meeting operations

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Corporate secretary teams

    Coordinate vote collection and operator roles

    More reliable voting flow

    Meeting operators guide voting steps and handle session actions for orderly tabulation.

  • Accessibility and communications teams

    Deliver captioned and accessible webcast

    Better participation accessibility

    Captioning and screen-reader friendly viewing help meet accessibility expectations for live sessions.

Best for: Fits when corporate governance teams need a controlled virtual meeting portal with moderated Q&A and managed voting workflows.

#10

Webex

enterprise

Cisco video conferencing and webinar platform for corporate meetings.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.6/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Role-based operator controls for Q&A moderation and participant management during the live webcast session.

Webex runs the live webcast and teleconferencing layer for virtual shareholder meetings, including screen-sharing, participant management, and recording for meeting archives. Its meeting controls support corporate governance workflows like Q&A moderation and structured polling during the webcast.

Pros
  • +Strong live webcast controls with Q&A moderation and operator-managed session flow
  • +Meeting recording and archives support post-meeting reference for corporate stakeholders
  • +SSO via SAML supports enterprise access governance for meeting operators and participants
  • +Stable teleconferencing feature set supports hybrid formats with consistent presenter controls
Cons
  • –Webex does not natively handle shareholder identity verification and identity-backed ballot controls
  • –Proxy distribution, ballot tabulation, and inspector-of-elections workflows require external systems
  • –Advanced meeting automation depends on admin configuration and integration rather than built-in meeting scripts
  • –Large-participant performance tuning needs careful planning for webcast latency thresholds
Use scenarios
  • IT and compliance teams

    Enforce governed meeting access

    Controlled meeting governance

  • Remote business teams

    Run recurring distributed meetings

    Easier follow-up after meetings

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Unified communications teams

    Connect room systems and dial-in

    Broader participation endpoints

    Teams integrate desktop and room experiences with dial-in and interoperability workflows for external calling.

  • Training instructors

    Deliver interactive live classes

    Interactive sessions with recordings

    Instructors run sessions with breakout rooms, whiteboarding, polling, and recordings with structured controls.

Best for: Fits when corporates need a governed webcast and operator workflow inside an existing meeting and voting stack.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 virtual shareholder meeting software, Q4 stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Q4

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software

Virtual shareholder meeting software coordinates the live meeting portal, moderated Q&A, webcast delivery, and the operational workflows that produce inspector-ready outputs for corporates. This guide covers Sherpany, Diligent, and the governance-focused workflow stack typified by Equiniti, along with Intralinks and Broadridge in the corporates tradeoff framing.

The tool set also includes meeting-ops variants that emphasize archive review and post-session accountability in OnBoard, webcast-native replay and multilingual accessibility in On24 and Q4, and event-operations configuration in Cvent. The remaining entries focus on what they do and do not natively cover around identity verification, proxy distribution, and ballot tabulation, including Webex and BigMarker.

Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software for governed portals, moderated Q&A, and proxy-adjacent workflows

Virtual shareholder meeting software runs shareholder participation workflows through a controlled meeting portal and a live webcast layer that supports moderated Q&A and post-meeting archives. Sherpany focuses on a structured Q&A moderation workflow inside the meeting portal, which routes submissions through handling rules during the live session.

Diligent similarly emphasizes governed Q&A moderation workflow design and role-based administrative controls for operational segregation across the meeting lifecycle. Across the category, the differentiator for corporates is how deeply each platform ties meeting operations to voting and proxy lifecycle requirements, since Webex and BigMarker keep identity-backed ballot controls and proxy tabulation outside their native scope.

Evaluation criteria for Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software

Virtual shareholder meeting software must run controlled meeting operations end to end, not just host a video stream, because corporates need repeatable workflows across portal, live session, and post-session outputs. The highest-impact features tie moderated participation to governance, then carry that operational trail into archives and outputs that support inspector-ready review cycles.

  • Structured Q&A moderation tied to meeting operations

    Sherpany and Diligent both emphasize governed Q&A moderation workflows with handling rules that reduce operator load during live sessions. Equiniti focuses on a structured moderator workflow for Q&A triage tied to meeting operations rather than ad-hoc chat handling.

  • Meeting portal workflow coverage with moderated participation

    Sherpany’s meeting portal consolidates voting, materials, and attendee participation while keeping Q&A routed through moderation. OnBoard pairs controlled portal operations with Q&A moderation tools designed for managed participation without deep in-house voting tooling.

  • Post-meeting accountability through meeting archive retention

    OnBoard is built around meeting archive retention with operator-accessible review materials for post-session accountability. Donnelley Financial Solutions coordinates portal, live Q&A moderation, and vote closeout into inspector-ready outputs for meeting lifecycle continuity.

  • Accessibility and identity governance in the live webcast layer

    Q4’s dual-language captioning is integrated into the live webcast experience for accessibility across multilingual shareholder audiences. Q4 also includes SAML SSO to reduce friction for enterprise identity management, while Webex provides role-based operator controls for Q&A moderation and participant management during the live webcast session.

  • Integration depth for proxy-adjacent workflows

    Sherpany and Diligent both require deliberate pre-meeting configuration when advanced identity and role mapping or automation is needed across external identity and voting systems. Webex and BigMarker keep identity verification and proxy distribution outside native scope, which shifts proxy lifecycle and ballot tabulation to external systems.

How corporates should choose a virtual shareholder meeting platform

Selection should start with workflow ownership because virtual shareholder meeting software succeeds when it matches the operating model of the corporate secretary, investor relations, and meeting ops teams. The next filter should be operational depth versus integration reliance, since tools differ in how much of the meeting lifecycle they own versus how much they delegate to upstream proxy and identity systems.

  • Pick the governance model for moderated participation

    If controlled Q&A handling rules must reduce live operator work, Sherpany and Diligent both provide moderated Q&A workflow design that routes submissions through handling rules. If the target is moderator triage workflows built for operational consistency, Equiniti’s structured moderator workflow is the closer fit.

  • Choose the archive strategy that matches inspector-ready review

    If the priority is operator-accessible review materials after the session, OnBoard’s meeting archive retention supports post-session accountability. If the priority is inspector-ready outputs across portal, webcast, Q&A, and vote closeout, Donnelley Financial Solutions coordinates run-of-show operations into inspector-ready outputs.

  • Decide how much of identity governance the platform must carry

    For enterprise SSO governance in the live meeting experience, Q4 includes SAML SSO while also integrating dual-language captioning into the live webcast experience. If identity-backed ballot controls and proxy distribution must stay inside the broader enterprise stack, Webex does not natively handle identity verification and ballot controls, so external systems must fill that gap.

  • Separate portal-native voting support from proxy coupling dependencies

    If the meeting ops team needs a portal that consolidates voting, materials, and participation, Sherpany’s meeting portal workflow is aligned to that operational bundling. If voting and ballot operations depend on tighter coupling to external proxy workflows, On24 keeps voting and ballot operations less native and pushes complexity into integration.

  • Map multi-meeting scale to setup effort and configuration discipline

    If many simultaneous events are planned, Sherpany notes pre-meeting configuration can be heavy, so setup capacity must be allocated. If meetings require hybrid format setup discipline across sessions, OnBoard calls out configuration governance as a dependency for hybrid formats.

Who should use which Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software

Corporate teams with repeatable meeting operations need platforms where moderated participation workflows and governance controls are designed for operational segregation. Organizations that run frequent AGMs or special meetings should also plan for archive retention and post-session evidence trails that reduce internal rework.

  • Corporate secretariat teams running governed virtual meeting workflows

    Diligent fits teams that require governed Q&A moderation workflows with role-based administrative controls for operational segregation across the meeting lifecycle.

  • Meeting ops teams standardizing portal and live participation under moderation

    Sherpany fits teams that need a meeting portal that consolidates voting, materials, and attendee participation while routing questions through a structured moderation workflow.

  • Ops teams that must produce post-session review materials and archive evidence

    OnBoard is a match when meeting archive retention is a primary operational requirement for operator-accessible review materials after the session.

  • Investor relations teams balancing multilingual accessibility with enterprise SSO

    Q4 is a fit when dual-language captioning needs to be integrated into the live webcast experience and SAML SSO is required for enterprise identity management.

  • Enterprises that already own identity verification and proxy lifecycle systems

    Webex fits when role-based operator controls and webcast recording are needed inside an existing meeting and voting stack while identity verification and identity-backed ballot controls stay outside native coverage.

Common pitfalls in buying Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software

Virtual shareholder meeting purchases often fail when governance workflows are assumed to be default features rather than configured operational controls tied to roles and meeting lifecycle stages. Another failure mode appears when identity verification, proxy distribution, and ballot tabulation expectations are left ambiguous before integration planning begins.

  • Assuming moderated Q&A is handled the same way as generic event chat

    Sherpany and Equiniti both emphasize structured moderation tied to meeting operations, so generic chat workflows do not replace moderated Q&A routing. Teams should confirm that the platform’s moderation workflow produces controlled outputs during the live session.

  • Ignoring pre-meeting configuration effort for multi-entity or multi-event operations

    Diligent notes meeting setup effort increases for multi-entity corporate structures, and Sherpany flags heavy pre-meeting configuration for many simultaneous events. Planning should include configuration time for identity and role mapping workflows rather than treating setup as trivial.

  • Underestimating how much proxy voting operations sit outside native scope

    Webex does not natively handle shareholder identity verification and identity-backed ballot controls, and BigMarker keeps proxy voting integration and ballot tabulation outside its primary native focus. Proxy distribution and ballot tabulation should be treated as integration-dependent workflows rather than features to expect from the meeting platform.

  • Choosing a webcast-first vendor without an inspector-ready post-session evidence plan

    On24 focuses on webcast-native event pages and replay-centered archives, but vote and ballot operations require tighter coupling to external proxy workflows. Donnelley Financial Solutions is a closer match when the evidence trail must include inspector-ready outputs covering portal, webcast, Q&A, and vote closeout.

  • Treating archive access as optional when internal accountability depends on review materials

    OnBoard’s standout capability is meeting archive retention with operator-accessible review materials, which directly supports post-session accountability. Tools without comparable archive evidence force manual reconstruction of moderation and operational steps.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated Sherpany, Diligent, and the other listed vendors using feature coverage at 40% weight, focusing on whether moderated Q&A workflows, portal participation, and post-session operational outputs are designed for corporate meeting cycles. Ease and value each contributed 30% by measuring how straightforward meeting portal operations and operator workflows are based on the documented setup effort and operational guidance described in each tool’s review card.

We weighted Sherpany’s performance by its structured Q&A moderation workflow inside the meeting portal and its meeting portal consolidation of voting, materials, and attendee participation, which aligns with governed virtual meeting operations. We used the same rubric to stress-test differences such as OnBoard’s archive retention, Q4’s dual-language captioning plus SAML SSO, and Webex’s lack of native identity verification and identity-backed ballot controls.

Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Shareholder Meeting Software

How do Sherpany and Diligent structure moderated Q&A so operator handling is auditable?
Sherpany runs Q&A inside the meeting portal with a structured submission to moderated output workflow, which keeps moderator actions tied to meeting operations. Diligent also uses governed Q&A moderation, with process logging focused on repeatable controls for corporate meeting teams.
Which platform best fits teams that need voting and proxy-lifecycle outputs tied to inspector-of-elections reporting?
Donnelley Financial Solutions is designed around end-to-end meeting operations that coordinate portal execution, vote closeout, and inspector-ready outputs. Equiniti also supports proxy voting integration and meeting archival, but Donnelley’s run-of-show execution model maps more directly to vote collection and tabulation handoffs.
What breaks if identity verification and eligibility controls are treated as an afterthought in a virtual-only meeting?
Webex can deliver a governed webcast and operator workflow for Q&A moderation, but it does not act as the full proxy and eligibility pipeline by itself. When Sherpany or Equiniti are not included to manage shareholder access rules and participation controls, the meeting stack loses continuity between access, voting eligibility, and results handling.
When does Cvent’s event-style workflow help more than a shareholder-meeting portal built around voting modules?
Cvent fits teams that standardize event operations and need configuration-heavy admin controls for approvals and engagement. For issuers that center the workflow on proxy voting and election handling, platforms like Q4 typically align better because the meeting portal bundles participation and voting tasks in one governed experience.
How do teams integrate external systems using API and workflow automation in Diligent versus Intralinks-style stacks?
Diligent emphasizes integration depth and automation options to coordinate meeting materials and participation across recurring meetings, which supports operational repeatability. The key tradeoff is that event-centric tooling like Cvent often requires more configuration mapping between upstream systems and the event execution flow than a governance-first shareholder-meeting suite.
Which tools support SSO governance via SAML and RBAC-style operator control for meeting administration?
Q4 supports SSO via SAML and governs access through role-based permissions with admin auditability. Webex also supports enterprise SSO with SAML and org-level configuration for participant access, while Sherpany focuses RBAC-style administration inside the meeting portal workflow.
How is meeting archive retention handled operationally in OnBoard compared with On24?
OnBoard centers meeting archive retention with operator-accessible review materials after the session for post-meeting accountability. On24 provides replay-focused archives tied to webcast-native event pages, so archive structure follows an investor consumption workflow rather than an operations review workflow.
What tradeoff appears when using Webex as the webcast layer inside a broader shareholder meeting stack?
Webex handles governed webcast delivery and participant management, including recording for archives, so teams can run a clean communications layer. The tradeoff is that proxy voting and ballot tabulation outputs still require a separate meeting governance and results workflow, which is where platforms like Equiniti or Donnelley focus execution.
Which approach better supports multilingual accessibility during a live webcast and meeting portal session?
Q4 integrates dual-language captioning into the live webcast experience, which addresses real-time accessibility for multilingual shareholder audiences. On24 focuses on webcast-native replay and accessibility for post-session consumption, which may not cover multilingual live captioning as tightly as Q4.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.