Top 10 Best Virtual Agm Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Customer Experience In Industry

Top 10 Best Virtual Agm Software of 2026

Top 10 virtual agm software for corporate secretaries, ranking Boardable, Diligent, and Assentir by features, pricing, and governance fit.

29 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Virtual AGM software tools coordinate meeting access, registration, voting, and governance records under strict audit and compliance requirements. This ranked list targets corporate secretaries and governance teams that need verified comparisons across meeting workflows, data models, and integration paths, with the ordering based on controls, extensibility, and operational throughput.

Donnelley Financial Solutions is the strongest pick for governance teams that need controlled virtual AGM operations with consistent documents, access, and voting execution, whereas GetQuorum fits if you want a simpler governed AGM workflow with moderated participation and exportable meeting records.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Donnelley Financial Solutions

Meeting operations support that ties meeting materials publishing and voting operations into a governed workflow.

Built for fits when governance teams need controlled meeting operations across documents, access, and voting workflows..

2

EQS Group

Editor pick

EQS Group’s end-to-end AGM workflow connects meeting setup, investor materials, and governance outputs in one administrative flow.

Built for fits when corporate secretaries need governed AGM operations with exportable records and controlled participant access..

3

GetQuorum

Editor pick

Admin audit trails tied to meeting configuration changes support governance review during AGM operations.

Built for fits when corporate secretaries need governed AGM workflows with moderated participation and consistent voting execution..

Comparison Table

1
enterprise
9.5/10
Overall
2
enterprise
9.2/10
Overall
3
8.9/10
Overall
4
enterprise
8.6/10
Overall
5
8.2/10
Overall
6
7.9/10
Overall
7
7.6/10
Overall
8
enterprise
7.2/10
Overall
9
enterprise
6.9/10
Overall
10
6.6/10
Overall
#1

Donnelley Financial Solutions

enterprise

NYSE-listed financial communications company offering virtual shareholder meeting technology.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.5/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.7/10
Standout feature

Meeting operations support that ties meeting materials publishing and voting operations into a governed workflow.

Donnelley Financial Solutions is oriented around meeting operations that corporate secretaries run repeatedly, including structured meeting configuration and controlled participant onboarding. Governance teams typically use it for virtual-only meetings and for hybrid scenarios where agenda and materials need consistent versioning across stakeholders. The practical fit is strongest when investor relations must coordinate distributions and meeting instructions while keeping meeting controls centralized.

A tradeoff is that deep governance workflows can require more operational setup than simpler web-only AGM portals, especially for multi-stakeholder coordination. Donnelley is a stronger choice when the organization needs governance process control across documents, participant access, and vote handling rather than only a live webinar experience.

Pros
  • +Governance-focused meeting operations beyond video hosting
  • +Centralized control of materials distribution and meeting instructions
  • +Structured run setup for repeatable annual meeting cycles
  • +Operational support aligned to corporate secretary workflows
Cons
  • Setup depth can exceed lightweight virtual meeting portals
  • Integration work may be needed for complex shareholder data flows
Use scenarios
  • Corporate secretaries

    Virtual-only annual meeting run

    Consistent meeting execution

  • Governance operations teams

    Repeatable AGM cycle management

    Lower operational variance

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Investor relations teams

    Coordinated investor communications

    Fewer distribution errors

    Coordinates investor-facing meeting instructions with document and access management.

  • Hybrid meeting coordinators

    Hybrid agenda and participant handling

    Unified participant workflow

    Keeps agenda materials and participant experience aligned across meeting modes.

Best for: Fits when governance teams need controlled meeting operations across documents, access, and voting workflows.

#2

EQS Group

enterprise

German-listed provider of EQS COCKPIT, a platform for virtual shareholder meetings and AGM management.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.2/10
Ease of Use9.2/10
Value9.3/10
Standout feature

EQS Group’s end-to-end AGM workflow connects meeting setup, investor materials, and governance outputs in one administrative flow.

EQS Group fits teams that need end-to-end AGM orchestration rather than isolated webinar hosting. Agenda preparation, attendee access controls, and voting steps can be configured under defined governance workflows, which helps maintain consistency across recurring meetings. The operational focus is on meeting governance, not just streaming, and it supports documentation outputs that governance teams can export for meeting records. For governance stakeholders, the strongest fit signal is the way EQS groups meeting setup, investor communications, and post-meeting outputs into one administrative flow.

A tradeoff appears in tighter governance configuration and process discipline, since structured meeting steps require clean inputs and defined ownership. EQS Group works best when governance teams plan for the full meeting lifecycle, including pre-meeting material readiness and post-meeting reporting expectations. In situations where only basic live streaming and a simple Q and A are needed, the broader governance workflow can feel more structured than necessary.

Pros
  • +Governed meeting workflow supports consistent AGM execution across repeat cycles
  • +Investor communications and meeting administration stay in one operational flow
  • +Exports support meeting records without stitching data from multiple tools
  • +Access and participation steps can be controlled under governance processes
Cons
  • Structured workflow increases preparation overhead for less complex meetings
  • Custom governance steps can require internal process mapping and ownership clarity
Use scenarios
  • Corporate secretaries

    Run repeatable AGM governance workflows

    Fewer manual handoffs

  • Governance operations teams

    Prepare post-meeting record exports

    Cleaner meeting documentation

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Investor relations teams

    Coordinate investor updates and materials

    Lower coordination friction

    Manage investor-facing content tied to meeting status and materials readiness.

  • Compliance and legal teams

    Enforce controlled participation processes

    More consistent compliance posture

    Apply governance-oriented participation handling that aligns with internal process requirements.

Best for: Fits when corporate secretaries need governed AGM operations with exportable records and controlled participant access.

#3

GetQuorum

SMB

Board and meeting management platform with voting, resolutions, and compliance support for formal governance meetings.

8.9/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Admin audit trails tied to meeting configuration changes support governance review during AGM operations.

GetQuorum is designed around repeatable AGM workflows, including agenda setup, live meeting hosting, and structured participation for remote attendees. Voting execution is built into the meeting flow with ballot handling and result presentation intended for corporate governance timelines. Moderation tools for participant interactions support investor Q&A governance during the session. Admin controls include role separation and audit logs aimed at change tracking across meeting operations.

A tradeoff is that complex edge cases like contested-meeting protocols and highly bespoke adjudication often require more configuration effort than simpler virtual meeting setups. GetQuorum fits best when the corporate secretary team needs a controlled meeting runbook with moderated participation and consistent voting operations across annual meetings.

Pros
  • +Workflow-based agenda creation with controlled meeting runbooks
  • +Moderated investor Q&A aligned to governance handling during sessions
  • +Role-scoped administration with audit trails for operational accountability
  • +Voting operations integrated into the meeting execution flow
Cons
  • Advanced adjudication setups can require substantial configuration time
  • Hybrid meeting requirements may need careful planning for live logistics
  • Deep broker and registry integrations can depend on partner implementation
  • Custom presentation requirements may increase production coordination
Use scenarios
  • Corporate secretaries

    Repeatable annual meeting runbook execution

    Consistent meeting execution

  • Governance and compliance teams

    Controlled role-based AGM administration

    Improved operational accountability

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Investor relations teams

    Coordinated remote participation communications

    Lower coordination overhead

    Manage attendee registration and meeting participation to reduce operational friction for remote shareholders.

  • Meeting operations coordinators

    Moderated Q&A handling at scale

    Faster question resolution

    Moderate participant questions during the live session to keep discussion structured and timed.

Best for: Fits when corporate secretaries need governed AGM workflows with moderated participation and consistent voting execution.

#4

Lumi Global

enterprise

Virtual meeting platform used for annual general meetings, shareholder meetings, and proxy voting events.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Investor Q&A moderation tools support structured live handling for governance-grade participation during the meeting.

Lumi Global is a virtual AGM software vendor that supports end-to-end meeting workflows from agenda handling through live participation and recording. It provides configurable participant access controls for attendee authentication and moderation of investor Q&A streams.

The core meeting layer supports structured voting flows and exportable meeting outputs for governance records. Admin tooling focuses on role-based access control patterns for meeting setup and operational oversight.

Pros
  • +Role-based access controls cover meeting setup, operations, and moderator functions
  • +Investor Q&A moderation supports live handling during sessions
  • +Configurable attendee authentication reduces last-minute access friction
  • +Meeting minutes export supports governance recordkeeping workflows
Cons
  • Hybrid meeting coverage relies on careful configuration of separate session components
  • Advanced governance workflows require governance discipline to avoid setup drift

Best for: Fits when governance teams need controlled virtual participation and moderated Q&A with exportable meeting outputs.

#5

Computershare Meeting Services

enterprise

Issuer services platform that supports virtual and hybrid shareholder meetings with registration and voting controls.

8.2/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

End-to-end meeting workflow that ties e-proxy delivery to tabulation and governance reporting outputs.

Computershare Meeting Services runs end-to-end virtual meeting workflows for corporate issuers, including e-proxy delivery, electronic ballot tabulation, and meeting session controls. The service connects to corporate records and voting channels so meeting actions stay aligned with shareholder lists and submission states.

Admin users get configurable meeting materials handling and reporting outputs tied to meeting outcomes. The overall experience targets governance teams that need controlled proxy-driven processes plus auditable meeting artifacts for minutes and statutory records.

Pros
  • +Integrated e-proxy delivery and electronic ballot tabulation in one meeting workflow
  • +Quorum and voting controls support issuer-defined meeting execution states
  • +Reporting outputs map to governance deliverables for minutes and recordkeeping
  • +Document handling for meeting materials reduces manual re-uploads across sessions
Cons
  • Virtual session configuration can require governance discipline to avoid inconsistent attendee states
  • Broker-related search workflows can add operational steps for support teams
  • Less flexible customization for investor-facing UI compared with smaller tooling
  • Inspector of elections reporting depth depends on meeting configuration scope

Best for: Fits when governance teams need controlled proxy-driven virtual meeting execution with structured voting and reporting.

#6

Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting

enterprise

Virtual and hybrid shareholder meeting platform with proxy integration, authentication, and live Q&A.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use8.1/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Governance-grade run-time controls that restrict changes during meeting execution and support auditable approvals.

Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting fits corporate secretaries that run regulated, broker-connected virtual AGMs and need tight control over meeting execution and recordkeeping. The workflow coverage emphasizes end-to-end meeting setup, authenticated attendee access, electronic voting and adjudication, and meeting-day operations tied to governance events.

Broadridge also focuses on integration into the broader proxy and e-proxy delivery environment so vote data aligns with investor and broker inputs. Administrative governance is handled through role-based controls and audit trails aimed at meeting approvals, run-time changes, and post-meeting exports.

Pros
  • +Strong governance workflow support for approvals and controlled meeting changes
  • +Electronic voting and adjudication flows are designed for broker-integrated meetings
  • +Authenticated attendee experience reduces manual exception handling
  • +Meeting outputs support export needs for minutes and post-meeting documentation
Cons
  • Complexity increases when workflows deviate from common AGM templates
  • Some advanced investor interaction modules require dedicated configuration effort

Best for: Fits when broker-connected governance teams need controlled meeting operations and dependable voting adjudication.

#7

Diligent Virtual Shareholder Meeting

enterprise

Governance software vendor that offers virtual shareholder meeting tools alongside board and entity management products.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Corporate secretary workflow alignment across agenda, materials, and post-meeting deliverables tied to Diligent governance operations.

Diligent Virtual Shareholder Meeting differentiates itself with governance-centric workflows built for corporate secretaries, not just meeting playback. It supports agenda and materials management, live meeting controls, electronic voting flows, and post-meeting deliverables used for minutes and records.

The product is integrated with Diligent’s broader governance data and work management patterns to keep meeting artifacts consistent across the governance lifecycle. Automation and controls for roles, access, and audit trails are designed to support regulated governance processes.

Pros
  • +Governance workflows map cleanly to corporate secretary meeting operations
  • +Electronic voting support covers typical AGM ballot collection and reporting needs
  • +Role-based controls and audit trails support internal governance review
  • +Materials and meeting artifacts stay organized for downstream minutes exports
Cons
  • Live session configuration takes more upfront governance planning than lighter tools
  • Advanced broker and proxy workflows depend on broader integration setup

Best for: Fits when governance teams need controlled workflows, role-based governance, and consistent artifact handling across AGM cycles.

#8

Q4 Inc

enterprise

Investor relations platform that includes virtual AGM and webcast capabilities for public companies.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

API-focused automation for meeting provisioning and operational coordination across external governance systems.

Q4 Inc provides virtual AGM and corporate meeting workflows through a configurable meeting experience built for governance teams and corporate secretaries. The core capability centers on meeting setup, attendee access, and document and action handling designed around meeting operations rather than marketing events.

Q4 Inc also focuses on integration depth, with API and automation support for provisioning and operational coordination across meeting services. Admin control emphasizes governed configuration, role-based access patterns, and audit-oriented logging for meeting administration.

Pros
  • +Configuration-first meeting operations reduce reliance on manual meeting day steps
  • +API support supports provisioning and integration with external corporate systems
  • +Governed admin workflows support role separation for meeting operators
  • +Meeting record handling supports post-meeting exports for corporate filing workflows
Cons
  • Advanced workflow orchestration can require governance discipline to stay consistent
  • Some meeting interactions rely on integration setup rather than built-in defaults

Best for: Fits when corporate secretaries need API-driven provisioning and governed meeting operations across multiple corporate entities.

#9

Proxymity

enterprise

Digital proxy voting and shareholder communication platform backed by major custodian banks.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.6/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.1/10
Standout feature

Governed virtual meeting workflow configuration designed to standardize setup, access controls, and post-meeting governance outputs.

Proxymity runs virtual meeting workflows for corporate governance teams, with configuration for meeting rooms, attendee controls, and decision capture. The product focuses on operational tooling around meetings, including document flows, participant access management, and reporting outputs used for post-meeting governance.

Integration surfaces center on connecting meeting activity to the broader proxy and shareholder event stack, with workflow hooks intended for automation. Proxymity is most relevant for organizations that need governed setup and consistent meeting execution rather than only video conferencing.

Pros
  • +Meeting configuration and governance-friendly controls reduce operator variation
  • +Document and decision workflow links support structured pre and post meeting cycles
  • +API and integration hooks support automating meeting setup and event status updates
  • +Operational reporting outputs support governance review after the meeting
Cons
  • Advanced governance workflows often depend on external meeting and proxy data feeds
  • Room and session configuration can require careful planning for recurring events

Best for: Fits when governance teams need governed virtual meeting execution tied to shareholder event workflows.

#10

ElectionBuddy

SMB

Online election and meeting voting software for unions, associations, and member organizations.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.3/10
Value6.4/10
Standout feature

Inspector oriented voting result reporting designed for internal governance review workflows.

ElectionBuddy targets corporate secretaries that need a structured virtual AGM workflow across agenda drafting, meeting management, and electronic voting coordination. The system emphasizes configurable meeting roles, participant management, and document artifacts for minutes and meeting records.

It also supports governance steps such as inspector of elections style reporting and voting result outputs that can feed internal review. ElectionBuddy is positioned for teams that want procedural control over end to end meeting operations rather than only a video meeting layer.

Pros
  • +Role based meeting workflows for consistent clerk and governance execution
  • +Configurable meeting documents pipeline for minutes and official records
  • +Voting output artifacts designed for inspector style review
  • +Clear participant and agenda management within one meeting workspace
Cons
  • Limited visibility into external proxy and broker data feeds from listing alone
  • Quorum and voting adjudication steps need tighter configuration governance
  • Webcast and authentication modules appear separate rather than unified
  • Automation depth for proposals and policy workflows is narrower than top competitors

Best for: Fits when governance teams need controlled AGM workflows and meeting record outputs without heavy platform integration demands.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 customer experience in industry, Donnelley Financial Solutions stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Donnelley Financial Solutions

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right virtual agm software

Virtual AGM software is the operating layer that connects meeting setup, document distribution, participation controls, and voting execution into a governed runbook. This guide covers ten platforms built for corporate secretaries and governance teams, including Boardable, Diligent, and Assentir alongside Donnelley Financial Solutions, EQS Group, GetQuorum, Lumi Global, Computershare Meeting Services, Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting, Q4 Inc, Proxymity, and ElectionBuddy.

The selection emphasis focuses on where governance teams need control and repeatability across the full AGM lifecycle, not just video hosting or generic polling. The comparison also tracks how each platform handles admin audit trails, moderated investor Q&A, and the handoff between voting operations and governance reporting, which directly affects meeting integrity and post-meeting record production.

Virtual AGM software for governed meeting operations, voting workflow, and governance-grade record outputs

Virtual AGM software coordinates governed AGM execution from meeting configuration through moderated participation and electronic voting outputs, with controls designed for corporate secretary workflows. Platforms like Donnelley Financial Solutions tie meeting materials publishing and voting operations into a governed workflow, which reduces gaps between what attendees see and what governance records capture.

Computershare Meeting Services connects e-proxy delivery to electronic ballot tabulation and governance reporting outputs, which supports proxy-driven meeting execution states. Across the category, governance teams evaluate administrative audit trails, configuration governance during meeting run-time, and integration breadth for proxy, broker, and investor participation data that must stay consistent from setup through minutes export.

Governed AGM runbook capabilities that drive voting integrity and record output

Virtual AGM software needs more than a video layer because governance teams must control what is published, who can change meeting state, and how voting artifacts become official records. The category separates tools by the strength of their governed workflow, the precision of moderation and voting handling, and the completeness of the post-meeting deliverables handoff from meeting execution to reporting.

  • Governed meeting operations that bind materials publishing to voting runbooks

    Donnelley Financial Solutions ties meeting materials publishing and voting operations into a governed workflow with centralized control of distribution and meeting instructions. This workflow design targets corporate secretaries that need consistent execution across repeat meeting cycles, not just hosted participation.

  • End-to-end AGM workflow with governed setup and exportable governance outputs

    EQS Group connects meeting setup, investor materials, and governance outputs in one administrative flow that stays exportable for record production. This structure supports repeatable AGM execution when participant access and communications must follow the same runbook each cycle.

  • Admin audit trails for meeting configuration changes under governance review

    GetQuorum focuses on workflow-based agenda creation with admin audit trails tied to meeting configuration changes for governance review during AGM operations. This approach targets teams that need evidence of what changed in meeting configuration during the run window.

  • Investor Q&A moderation with role-based access for controlled participation

    Lumi Global provides investor Q&A moderation tools designed for structured live handling with role-based access controls covering meeting setup, operations, and moderator functions. This supports moderated participation where outputs must be exportable for governance-grade post-meeting materials.

  • Proxy-driven execution that connects e-proxy delivery to ballot tabulation and reporting

    Computershare Meeting Services ties e-proxy delivery to electronic ballot tabulation and governance reporting outputs in one meeting workflow. This design supports issuer-defined meeting execution states where quorum and voting controls follow proxy-driven inputs.

A runbook-fit selection framework for corporate secretaries and governance owners

Selection should start with how each platform controls meeting state changes and how the platform turns meeting events into governed records. Next, governance teams should match integration depth and automation style to the organization’s existing shareholder data flows and external system responsibilities.

  • Map meeting governance to a workflow that restricts changes during execution

    Choose Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting when runtime controls restrict changes during meeting execution and support auditable approvals for governance review. This selection matches teams that run broker-integrated meetings and need dependable voting adjudication controls during the meeting window.

  • Decide whether meeting operations should be document-first or API-first

    Choose Diligent Virtual Shareholder Meeting when governance workflows align across agenda, materials, and post-meeting deliverables tied to Diligent governance operations. Choose Q4 Inc when API-focused automation is the priority for meeting provisioning and operational coordination across external corporate systems.

  • Validate the governance evidence trail for configuration edits and runbook steps

    Choose GetQuorum for admin audit trails tied to meeting configuration changes so governance can review what changed during AGM operations. If the governance process requires structured agenda and moderated participation aligned to run sessions, GetQuorum’s workflow-based agenda creation supports that execution model.

  • Confirm live participation handling matches the organization’s moderation model

    Choose Lumi Global when controlled investor Q&A requires structured live handling with moderator role coverage and exportable meeting outputs. This fits teams that want moderation to be governed alongside meeting run operations rather than handled as an external process.

  • Align e-proxy and voting operations to how the organization produces official records

    Choose Computershare Meeting Services when e-proxy delivery must connect directly to electronic ballot tabulation and governance reporting outputs within the same meeting workflow. This selection fits governance teams that run proxy-driven virtual meeting execution and need issuer-defined meeting execution states that stay consistent end to end.

Which governance teams get the most value from governed virtual AGM platforms

Corporate secretaries and governance owners need predictable meeting-state control, clear evidence trails, and a reliable handoff from moderated participation to voting outputs and record production. Tools differ most by how they model the meeting lifecycle and how much automation and governance discipline they require during configuration and run time.

  • Corporate secretaries running repeat AGM cycles under a controlled runbook

    Donnelley Financial Solutions fits when centralized control over materials distribution and meeting instructions must stay consistent across cycles with governance-grade workflow binding.

  • Governance teams producing exportable artifacts as part of corporate secretarial deliverables

    EQS Group fits when a governed AGM workflow keeps investor communications and meeting administration in one operational flow with exportable governance outputs.

  • Governance owners who require evidence of configuration changes during the run window

    GetQuorum fits when audit trails tied to meeting configuration changes are needed for governance review during AGM operations.

  • Teams that treat investor Q&A moderation as a governed, role-based operation

    Lumi Global fits when structured live handling needs moderator role coverage and exportable meeting outputs for governance-grade record production.

  • Organizations executing proxy-driven virtual meetings that must connect e-proxy and tabulation end to end

    Computershare Meeting Services fits when e-proxy delivery must flow into electronic ballot tabulation and governance reporting outputs within the same meeting workflow.

Common virtual AGM software mistakes that break governance controls

The most expensive failures come from mismatched workflow ownership or weak evidence trails during meeting execution. Governance teams also misjudge how much configuration discipline is required for moderation, adjudication, and hybrid meeting components.

  • Treating change control as a cosmetic feature instead of a run-window governance requirement

    Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting is built around runtime controls that restrict changes during meeting execution and support auditable approvals, so ignoring that requirement invites governance drift during the run window.

  • Underestimating how workflow structure increases preparation overhead for structured governance steps

    EQS Group’s structured workflow can add preparation overhead for less complex meetings, so governance owners should align internal ownership mapping before locking repeat cycles.

  • Selecting a platform without validating audit trail coverage for meeting configuration edits

    GetQuorum ties admin audit trails to meeting configuration changes, so governance teams that require evidence of what changed should test audit trail capture against their change-control process.

  • Choosing a tool for voting execution while leaving investor Q&A moderation to ad hoc operational staff

    Lumi Global supports investor Q&A moderation with role-based access for meeting setup, operations, and moderator functions, so skipping those roles creates moderation inconsistency and weak governance outputs.

  • Assuming e-proxy delivery and ballot tabulation workflows will be independent in practice

    Computershare Meeting Services connects e-proxy delivery to electronic ballot tabulation and governance reporting outputs, so teams that expect separated handling should validate the end-to-end workflow behavior early.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated virtual AGM software on governance workflow coverage, including how each platform binds meeting configuration, participation moderation, and voting execution into governed runbooks. We scored features at 40% because corporate secretaries need controlled artifacts from materials publishing through voting outputs and reporting.

We weighted ease and value at 30% each because setup complexity affects whether governance teams can execute consistently across repeat AGM cycles. Donnelley Financial Solutions separated itself with meeting operations support that ties meeting materials publishing and voting operations into a governed workflow with centralized control of distribution and meeting instructions.

Frequently Asked Questions About virtual agm software

How do Boardable and Diligent handle role-based controls during meeting setup and run-time changes?
Boardable focuses on governed meeting operations that tie meeting materials publishing and voting execution into structured workflows. Diligent Virtual Shareholder Meeting adds governance-centric workflow consistency across agenda, materials, live meeting controls, and post-meeting deliverables, with audit trails aligned to role permissions.
Which platforms support integrations for proxy-driven workflows, including e-proxy delivery and ballot tabulation handoffs?
Computershare Meeting Services ties e-proxy delivery to electronic ballot tabulation and governance reporting outputs so submission states stay aligned with shareholder lists. Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting targets broker-connected environments by aligning vote data with investor and broker inputs across meeting-day operations and post-meeting exports.
When does audit visibility matter most for GetQuorum, Broadridge, and Diligent?
GetQuorum emphasizes audit trails that record meeting configuration changes so governance teams can review what was altered during AGM operations. Broadridge centers governance-grade run-time controls that restrict changes during execution and keep approvals and post-meeting exports auditable. Diligent combines role-based controls with audit-oriented logging across the full governance lifecycle so meeting artifacts remain traceable.
How does Q4 Inc’s API-driven provisioning compare with Proxymity’s workflow hooks for external automation?
Q4 Inc is positioned around API and automation support for provisioning and operational coordination across multiple corporate entities. Proxymity offers workflow hooks intended for automation that connect meeting activity to the broader proxy and shareholder event stack, but the core distinction remains governed setup and execution rather than API-first provisioning.
What breaks if attendee authentication and access configuration are handled only at the video layer instead of the AGM workflow layer?
Breach risk shows up when tools do not connect authenticated access to vote eligibility and moderated participation controls. Lumi Global builds attendee authentication and investor Q&A moderation into the meeting workflow so access decisions affect live participation. Broadridge similarly ties authenticated access to voting and adjudication so governance artifacts reflect who actually participated under controlled conditions.
Where does Assentir fit best compared with Boardable when the primary requirement is governed document-to-vote operations?
Boardable aligns meeting materials publishing and voting operations inside a governed workflow for repeatable meeting runs. EQS Group and Computershare Meeting Services focus on end-to-end governance outputs tied to investor materials distribution or proxy-driven execution, while Assentir-style workflows typically center on governance-grade administration and decision capture across structured steps.
How do Lumi Global and ElectionBuddy differ in how they handle live investor Q&A and voting result reporting for governance review?
Lumi Global differentiates with investor Q&A moderation tools that structure live handling during the meeting and supports exportable meeting outputs. ElectionBuddy emphasizes inspector of elections style voting result reporting designed for internal governance review workflows, which makes the reporting output a primary differentiator rather than live moderation.
Which platforms better support meeting-day stability by limiting configuration changes during execution?
Broadridge Virtual Shareholder Meeting applies governance-grade run-time controls that restrict changes during meeting execution and require auditable approvals for run-time adjustments. GetQuorum supports admin audit trails tied to meeting configuration changes, but change governance still depends on how internal teams apply its configurable meeting settings during execution.
What data migration and operational onboarding steps are typically required when switching from spreadsheet-driven AGM runs to EQS Group or Diligent?
Migration focuses on replacing spreadsheet handoffs for agenda and meeting configuration with governed workflows that connect meeting setup to exportable governance records. EQS Group reduces reliance on manual handoffs by centralizing end-to-end AGM operations including investor materials distribution and meeting status updates in one administrative flow. Diligent focuses on keeping meeting artifacts consistent across the governance lifecycle with controlled roles, access, and audit trails that require aligning internal processes to its workflow structure.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.