GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Scientific Graphing Software of 2026
Top 10 scientific graphing software ranking for scientists and engineers, comparing Mathematica, Veusz, MATLAB and Python tools with tradeoffs and charts.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Mathematica is the best choice if your research team needs reproducible, formula-linked figures from one programmable notebook workflow, whereas Veusz is a strong budget-friendly entry when labs want script-driven, publication-ready 2D/3D graphs from recurring analysis runs.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Mathematica
Notebook evaluation drives plots directly from symbolic definitions, so updates propagate across styling, annotations, and derived computations.
Built for fits when research teams need reproducible, formula-linked figures from one programmable notebook workflow..
Veusz
Editor pickA document-based figure definition model paired with scripting and command-line batch plotting for consistent multi-figure regeneration.
Built for fits when labs need reproducible, script-driven paper figures from recurring analysis runs..
MATLAB
Editor pickGraphics handles and templates allow scripted, programmatic control of figure composition beyond interactive tweaking.
Built for fits when research groups need reproducible scripted figures with tight coupling to numerical computation..
Comparison Table
Mathematica
scientific computingComputational software platform with advanced symbolic computation, visualization, and scientific plotting.
Notebook evaluation drives plots directly from symbolic definitions, so updates propagate across styling, annotations, and derived computations.
Mathematica’s notebook environment ties plot generation to a programmable evaluation model, so figures update when definitions change. Plot output can be exported through multiple vector and document formats, and labels can be rendered with high-fidelity typesetting for mathematical notation. Batch plotting is feasible through scripted generation of parameter sweeps that produce multi-panel figures from a single set of plotting functions.
A key tradeoff is that deep graph customization sometimes requires strong knowledge of Mathematica’s expression language and plotting options. Mathematica fits when complex, reproducible figure pipelines must stay consistent across datasets, and when symbolic-to-numeric transformations are part of the analysis.
- +Symbolic-to-numeric plotting keeps formulas and figures synchronized
- +Vector exports preserve typography and layout control
- +Batch plotting can generate multi-panel outputs from parameter sweeps
- +Programmable styling enables repeatable figure templates
- –Advanced customization can require steep option and expression-language learning
- –GUI-first charting workflows feel heavier than in native plotting tools
- –Large notebook-driven figure pipelines can become slow without planning
- –Interfacing external plotting stacks often needs extra glue code
Computational physics teams
Update theory curves from symbolic fits
Faster iteration on results
Materials science researchers
Generate multi-panel analysis from sweeps
Consistent figure sets
Show 2 more scenarios
Engineering researchers
Produce annotated 3D surface figures
Clearer design insights
Render parameterized surfaces with controlled camera, lighting, and overlay annotations for reports.
Bioinformatics analysts
Plot derived metrics with exact notation
Less manual figure editing
Use the same definitions for computed metrics and LaTeX-quality math labels in scientific figures.
Best for: Fits when research teams need reproducible, formula-linked figures from one programmable notebook workflow.
Veusz
open-source desktop softwareOpen-source scientific plotting software for producing publication-ready 2D and 3D figures.
A document-based figure definition model paired with scripting and command-line batch plotting for consistent multi-figure regeneration.
Veusz is designed around a document-style workflow where plot definitions and styling live in a project file, which supports reproducible figure regeneration for experiments and reports. Its scripting and command-line plotting modes enable batch plotting, including generation of many figures from parameter sweeps. The editor covers common 2D scientific plotting needs such as error bars, nonlinear fitting, and data interpolation, which reduces the need to round-trip through general-purpose plotting stacks.
A key tradeoff is that Veusz targets scientific figure rendering more than general data engineering or model training, so upstream data preparation still needs separate tooling. Veusz fits best when figure output must stay consistent across repeated analyses, such as a lab pipeline that regenerates the same multi-panel figure set after rerunning statistics.
- +Project files capture figure structure for repeatable regeneration
- +Scripting enables batch plotting across parameter sweeps
- +Vector export supports journal workflows and diagram reuse
- +Fitting workflows reduce manual data wrangling before plots
- –Data preparation and orchestration require external tooling
- –Deep customization can require learning the document and scripting model
- –Large interactive datasets can feel slower than code-first plotting stacks
- –Automating complex conditional layouts takes more scripting work
Lab scientists
Regenerate figures after rerunning experiments
Fewer manual reformatting errors
Research engineers
Automate plotting from pipelines
Repeatable figure production
Show 1 more scenario
Data analysts in academia
Run fits and visualize residuals
Clearer model interpretation
Apply fitting and plot results in one workflow to keep assumptions aligned with figures.
Best for: Fits when labs need reproducible, script-driven paper figures from recurring analysis runs.
MATLAB
scientific computingNumerical computing platform with extensive plotting and scientific visualization capabilities.
Graphics handles and templates allow scripted, programmatic control of figure composition beyond interactive tweaking.
MATLAB’s plotting stack is driven by an object-based graphics system where figures, axes, and visual elements can be created and updated programmatically. Batch plotting works cleanly because figure generation can be embedded in scripts that loop over datasets, parameters, or experiment runs. Reproducibility is aided by keeping data transforms and the figure creation steps together in the same codebase.
A key tradeoff is that MATLAB-centric workflows can increase friction when team pipelines standardize on Python-only tooling. One common fit is exploratory analysis in MATLAB followed by scripted regeneration of multi-panel figures for repeated report runs.
- +Object-based figure control supports fine-grained styling and layout
- +Scripted figure generation enables repeatable batch outputs
- +High fidelity 3D surface and contour rendering for technical data
- +Consistent workflow linking computation to plotted results
- –Python-only teams may face integration overhead for MATLAB-centric plotting
- –Custom figure templating can require graphics-object knowledge
- –Large automation pipelines can grow complex around figure state
- –Some publication formats depend on conversion steps outside MATLAB
Academic lab analysts
Regenerate multi-panel figures per parameter sweep
Repeatable report-ready visuals
Engineering data teams
Model fitting with plots for diagnostics
Faster validation cycles
Show 1 more scenario
Publication-focused researchers
Export vector figures for manuscripts
Crisp print-quality graphics
Generate figures in MATLAB and export clean vector artwork for journal layouts.
Best for: Fits when research groups need reproducible scripted figures with tight coupling to numerical computation.
GraphPad Prism
vertical specialistBiostatistics and scientific graphing software focused on analysis workflows common in life sciences.
Nonlinear fitting results link directly into the same project workflow for plotting fitted curves and confidence intervals.
GraphPad Prism is a scientific graphing and curve-fitting tool built around the repeatable workflow of importing data into a study-centric analysis layout. It handles nonlinear fitting, regression curves, and publication-grade figure export with strong support for error bars, confidence intervals, and multi-panel layouts.
The software’s emphasis on guided analyses reduces the amount of custom scripting needed for common biostatistics and experimental plots. Prism’s automation is mainly centered on repeatable templates and batch figure generation rather than general-purpose programming.
- +Curve fitting workflow is tightly integrated with plotting and figure layout
- +Publication-oriented exports include vector formats and consistent typography
- +Statistical plot types and annotations are available without scripting
- +Multi-panel figure assembly maintains alignment and shared axes options
- –Scripting and API surface are limited compared with code-first toolchains
- –Advanced plot automation for large studies can require manual template management
- –Data transformation steps are less flexible than full programming environments
- –Reproducibility across heterogeneous pipelines depends on consistent Prism project files
Best for: Fits when lab teams need consistent nonlinear fitting and publication figures with minimal scripting overhead.
Igor Pro
scientific computingTechnical computing software that combines scientific graphing, analysis, and programmable workflows.
Wave-based programming with tightly coupled graph updates and analysis functions for reproducible, scripted workflows.
Igor Pro turns raw experimental data into publication-ready 2D plots through an integrated graphing and analysis workflow. The software mixes interactive figure building with a programmable environment for nonlinear fitting, curve fitting, peak analysis, and batch plotting.
Igor Pro also supports scripted reproducibility via procedures, wave-based data handling, and automated multi-panel figure generation. Export tools include raster and vector figure outputs for inclusion in scientific documents.
- +Wave-based processing keeps plotting, analysis, and transformations in one workflow
- +Powerful nonlinear fitting and least-squares routines handle many experimental models
- +Batch plotting supports multi-panel figure generation for repeated measurements
- +Vector export targets journal-ready figures with consistent typography
- –Scripting depth adds learning overhead versus code-light plotting tools
- –Some interoperability needs extra export or add-on steps for downstream pipelines
- –Large projects can become slow when many graphs and waves update frequently
- –Cross-language automation is weaker than MATLAB workflows based on external scripting
Best for: Fits when lab groups need interactive graphing plus automated fitting and batch figure creation in one environment.
LabPlot
open-source desktop softwareOpen-source data visualization and analysis application for scientific plotting and fitting.
A spreadsheet-oriented data and calculation workflow that ties transformations, fits, and plots to a single project workspace.
LabPlot targets scientific plotting workflows that need interactive 2D plotting with a workbook-style organization of data sets, plots, and layouts. It supports a charting pipeline centered on measured data with error bars and computed series, plus regression and curve-fitting tools for analysis and visualization in one workspace.
Figure output covers common scientific publishing formats through vector export and multi-panel figure assembly. Compared with MATLAB and many Python plotting stacks, LabPlot emphasizes a GUI-driven workflow with scriptable automation hooks for repeatable figure generation.
- +Workbook-like project structure keeps datasets, fits, and layouts linked
- +Vector export outputs high-quality figures suitable for publication workflows
- +Built-in regression and nonlinear fitting reduce the need for external tooling
- +Batch plotting works for repeated datasets with consistent plot styling
- –Advanced automation depends more on scripting than on built-in orchestration
- –Some specialized analysis workflows require manual data preparation steps
- –3D surface rendering coverage is narrower than MATLAB-style visualization suites
- –Large projects can become sluggish when many plots and multi-panel layouts are open
Best for: Fits when lab teams need repeatable GUI-driven figure generation with fitting and publication-grade export.
SciDAVis
open-source desktop softwareData analysis and visualization application for scientific plotting and curve fitting.
Built-in peak analysis and curve fitting tools operate directly on plotted data within the project workspace.
SciDAVis targets desktop scientific plotting with a workflow centered on interactive 2D graph creation and measurement-aware annotations. It includes curve fitting and peak analysis tooling in the same interface used for plotting and figure layout, which reduces handoff friction versus general plotting libraries.
Export is built around publication formats such as SVG, PDF, and EPS, with attention to typography via LaTeX label rendering. Data import and transformation happen inside the project graph environment so plots can be regenerated from updated datasets without rewriting plot scripts.
- +Tight coupling of curve fitting and peak analysis with plot editing
- +Figure export supports SVG, PDF, and EPS for publication workflows
- +LaTeX label rendering keeps math styling consistent across figures
- +Batch plotting can regenerate many figures from imported datasets
- –Scripting and automation are limited compared with notebook-based Python workflows
- –Large multi-panel layouts become cumbersome without careful template discipline
Best for: Fits when lab teams need interactive 2D figures, fitting, and publication exports without Python scripting.
Maple
scientific computingMathematical computing software with technical visualization and plotting for scientific workflows.
Worksheet-driven plotting that stays synchronized with Maple’s symbolic expressions during parameterized updates.
Maple is a scientific graphing environment tied to a symbolic math engine and worksheet workflow. Its plotting stack integrates 2D and 3D visualization with programmable manipulation of expressions, parameters, and figure layout.
Built-in export supports publication formats and vector outputs for figures that need to travel into reports and slide decks. Maple also supports scripting through its Maple language so graph generation can be made reproducible across batches and parameter sweeps.
- +Tight link between symbolic expressions and plotted curves for consistent transformations
- +Figure scripting makes batch plotting with shared styles practical
- +Vector export paths support diagram-grade outputs for diagrams and labels
- +Works well for parameterized plots that update from algebraic definitions
- –Nontrivial Maple-language learning curve for fully automated plotting
- –Some advanced layout workflows take manual tuning compared with GUI-first tools
- –Large multi-panel figures can become slow when recomputing symbolic expressions
- –Interfacing with external data pipelines requires extra glue code
Best for: Fits when reproducible math-to-figure workflows need symbolic control, scripted batch plotting, and publication-ready exports.
Plotly Chart Studio
web visualization platformWeb-based charting environment for creating interactive scientific and analytical graphs.
Plotly figure JSON as the shared contract between browser edits and programmatic figure generation.
Plotly Chart Studio provides a browser-based editor for Plotly figures so teams can adjust traces, layout, and annotations without rewriting plotting code for every iteration.
Exports focus on publication-grade assets such as SVG and PDF, which helps when figures must be embedded into document toolchains.
The product centers on the Plotly figure specification, so interactive changes remain compatible with Plotly libraries that generate the same figure JSON from code.
- +Browser editor works directly on Plotly figure structure for quick iteration
- +Exports include vector formats like SVG and PDF for figure-quality workflows
- +Figure JSON supports round-tripping between interactive edits and code generation
- +Sharing controls support private figures for team review cycles
- –Advanced statistical workflows require external scripting beyond point-and-click editing
- –Reproducibility depends on maintaining the figure spec and generation code
- –Large batch figure creation is less direct than code-first plotting pipelines
- –Collaboration controls do not replace a full lab governance model
Best for: Fits when teams need interactive figure editing plus vector exports without abandoning Plotly-based code workflows.
JMP
enterpriseStatistical discovery software with interactive graphing for scientific data analysis.
Fitted-model terms stay bound to the visualization, so plot and diagnostics update together during exploration.
JMP serves scientists and engineers who need interactive visual analysis plus statistical modeling in one workspace. Graphing in JMP is tightly coupled to fitting and diagnostics, so plot updates reflect model changes without rebuilding scripts.
It supports publication-oriented exports like PDF, EPS, and SVG output, plus multi-panel layouts for figure assembly. Scripting through JMP add-ins and platform-integrated automation supports reproducible workflows that combine modeling steps with figure generation.
- +Model-linked graphs update directly from fitted terms and diagnostics
- +Multi-panel figure assembly reduces manual rework across plots
- +Export pipeline covers vector outputs like EPS and SVG
- +Add-in scripting supports automation of analysis and figure steps
- –Programmable figure generation depends on JMP scripting conventions
- –Large batch plotting can feel slower than code-first Python workflows
- –Advanced custom rendering can require scripting rather than UI configuration
- –Collaboration controls for shared projects rely more on JMP deployment setup
Best for: Fits when teams need interactive statistics plus export-ready figures with low script overhead.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 data science analytics, Mathematica stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right scientific graphing software
Scientific graphing software covers workflows that turn measured data and fitted models into publishable 2D and 3D figures with controlled typography and repeatable regeneration. This guide compares Mathematica, MATLAB, and code-first alternatives like Plotly Chart Studio, along with lab-oriented figure tools such as GraphPad Prism, Igor Pro, and JMP.
It also includes document- and workbook-style figure systems like Veusz and LabPlot, plus peak-and-fit-centric workspaces like SciDAVis and worksheet-driven symbolic plotting in Maple. The comparison focuses on how each tool links computations to figure definitions, how much automation and scripting control exists, and how well export pipelines serve publication needs.
Scientific graphing software for reproducible 2D and 3D figures tied to analysis workflows
Scientific graphing software creates figures from datasets, transformations, and fitted models while preserving relationships between the underlying computations and the final layout. This is done through symbolic-to-plot linking in Mathematica notebooks and through scripted, object-based figure composition in MATLAB figure generation.
Many tools also support publication-oriented exports that keep styling consistent across multi-panel figures, and they vary sharply in how much automation and API surface exists for batch plotting. GraphPad Prism concentrates nonlinear fitting outputs inside the project workflow for consistent plotting and confidence intervals, while Veusz uses a document-based figure definition model plus scripting and command-line batch plotting for repeated regeneration.
Key capabilities that determine reproducible scientific figure pipelines
Scientific graphing software succeeds when figure definitions stay linked to the computations that generate them, so style edits and derived results remain consistent across regenerations. Mathematica connects plots directly to symbolic definitions in its notebook workflow, so updates propagate across styling, annotations, and derived computations.
The next tier is automation depth, where software must support scripted composition or repeatable regeneration beyond interactive tweaking. MATLAB and Veusz focus on programmable figure generation and batch plotting, while GraphPad Prism and SciDAVis concentrate automation inside a project workspace for publication-oriented figure workflows.
Computation-to-figure linking that keeps edits synchronized
Mathematica propagates changes from symbolic definitions through plotting, annotations, and derived computations in the same notebook workflow. JMP binds fitted-model terms to diagnostics and graphs so plots update together as fitted terms change.
Programmable figure composition with repeatable batch generation
MATLAB uses graphics handles and templates to generate figures programmatically with scripted figure generation for repeatable batch outputs. Veusz pairs a document-based figure definition model with scripting and command-line batch plotting for consistent multi-figure regeneration.
Workflow-native nonlinear fitting tied to what gets plotted
GraphPad Prism integrates nonlinear fitting results into the same project workflow so fitted curves and confidence intervals plot without breaking the workflow context. Igor Pro couples wave-based processing with analysis functions so plotting, transformations, and fitting can remain in one scripted environment.
Document and workbook structures for regenerating paper figures
Veusz stores figure structure in project files so recurring analysis runs recreate the same multi-figure layout. LabPlot uses a workbook-like project workspace that keeps datasets, fits, and layouts linked so GUI-driven figure generation stays reproducible.
Publication-grade vector export that matches typical figure typography needs
Mathematica provides vector exports that preserve typography and layout control for publication-ready figures. SciDAVis exports figures as SVG, PDF, and EPS as part of its figure export workflow tied to curve fitting and peak analysis.
How to choose scientific graphing software by automation depth and workflow coupling
Start by identifying where figure truth should live in the workflow. If the source of truth is symbolic and computation-linked, Mathematica and Maple keep plots synchronized with symbolic expressions during parameterized updates.
Choose the figure definition ownership model
If figure structure must update from symbolic definitions, Mathematica and Maple keep plotted curves synchronized with their symbolic expressions. If figure structure must live in a document or workbook for team reuse, Veusz and LabPlot store figure composition in project artifacts that support repeatable regeneration.
Match automation to how work actually gets executed
If the team runs scripted batch figure generation, MATLAB and Veusz provide figure generation via scripts and command-line batch plotting. If figure generation is driven by interactive fits inside a controlled project file, GraphPad Prism and SciDAVis keep nonlinear fitting and figure editing tightly coupled in the workspace.
Decide how fitting should plug into the plotting lifecycle
If nonlinear fitting outputs must immediately produce fitted curves and confidence intervals inside one workflow, GraphPad Prism keeps the curve fitting workflow integrated with plotting and figure layout. If fitting needs to stay in a wave-based analysis environment, Igor Pro keeps wave-based processing and analysis functions coupled to graph updates.
Set expectations for integration with code-first pipelines
If Python-first reproducibility and integration matter, Mathematica, MATLAB, and JMP can add integration overhead when teams standardize on Python-only toolchains. If a shared JSON figure spec can become the integration contract, Plotly Chart Studio uses Plotly figure JSON as the shared contract between browser edits and programmatic generation.
Plan for template and layout governance as figure counts grow
If multi-panel layouts must scale through templating and object control, MATLAB uses object-based figure control and templates for scripted figure composition. If multi-panel figure assembly must reduce manual rework, JMP includes multi-panel figure assembly that updates directly from fitted terms and diagnostics.
Who benefits from each scientific graphing software workflow
Scientific graphing software pays off when figure regeneration must stay consistent with analysis updates. Teams with strong computation-linked workflows tend to prefer Mathematica notebooks and MATLAB figure generation pipelines, while labs focused on consistent nonlinear fits often prefer GraphPad Prism project workflows.
Research teams using symbolic workflows as the computational source of truth
Mathematica and Maple keep symbolic definitions synchronized with plotted curves so parameterized updates stay consistent across figures. This reduces divergence between derivations and figure appearance when annotations and derived computations evolve.
Labs that run recurring analysis batches and need deterministic multi-figure regeneration
Veusz supports scripting plus command-line batch plotting with project files that capture figure structure for repeatable regeneration. MATLAB offers scripted figure generation via graphics-object control and templates for repeatable batch outputs.
Teams that treat nonlinear fitting and publication plotting as one continuous workflow
GraphPad Prism links nonlinear fitting outputs to plotted fitted curves and confidence intervals inside the same project workflow. SciDAVis links curve fitting and peak analysis directly to plotted data within its project workspace.
Experimental groups that process signals or wave data and want fitting tied to graph updates
Igor Pro keeps wave-based processing and graph updates in one environment so analysis transformations stay coupled to plotting. This matches workflows where transformations and fitting are iterative and visually verified during exploration.
Statistics-focused teams that want fitted-model diagnostics to drive what plots
JMP binds model-linked graphs to fitted terms and diagnostics so plot updates follow fitted-model changes without separate scripting steps. This supports interactive statistics exploration with export-ready multi-panel assembly.
Common pitfalls when adopting scientific graphing software for publication pipelines
Many adoption failures come from choosing a workflow that cannot regenerate figures deterministically. Another common failure is underestimating how much automation depth is needed for large parameter sweeps or multi-panel figure sets.
Assuming document-based figure definition files eliminate the need for external data preparation
Veusz and LabPlot can keep figure structure reproducible, but both still require external tooling or manual preparation for more complex data orchestration and specialized analysis inputs. Teams should budget time for data staging when the project file is not the full data pipeline.
Overestimating how far point-and-click editing supports reproducibility for advanced statistical workflows
Plotly Chart Studio relies on maintaining the figure spec and generation code for reproducibility, and advanced statistical workflows require external scripting beyond browser edits. Teams that need repeatable statistical automation typically require stronger code-first workflows around the figure generation step.
Treating GUI-first plotting as equivalent to scalable batch plotting
SciDAVis can become cumbersome for large multi-panel layouts without careful template discipline, even though it keeps peak analysis and curve fitting tightly coupled to plot editing. MATLAB and Veusz reduce this friction by centering scripted figure generation and document-captured figure structure.
Picking a fitting-centric tool but then expecting extensive automation through an exposed API
GraphPad Prism keeps nonlinear fitting workflows integrated with plotting, but its scripting and API surface are limited compared with code-first toolchains. Teams with large study automation needs often require either code-based generation layers or a tool with deeper scripting depth.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Mathematica, MATLAB, and the other listed scientific graphing tools on features, ease, and value using the supplied overall, features, ease, and value scores. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking weight, ease accounted for 30%, and value accounted for 30%.
Mathematica ranked first because its symbolic-to-numeric plotting drives plots directly from symbolic definitions in a notebook workflow, which keeps formulas and figures synchronized for reproducible regeneration. Mathematica also scored highly for vector export typography and layout control, which supports multi-panel publication output.
Frequently Asked Questions About scientific graphing software
How do Mathematica and MATLAB keep plots synchronized with the underlying math or computation?
When do Veusz and SciDAVis work better than MATLAB-style interactive figure tweaking?
Which tool is most suitable for study-centric nonlinear fitting with confidence intervals in the same workflow?
What breaks when exporting publication graphics from Plotly Chart Studio versus MATLAB or Mathematica?
How do Igor Pro and LabPlot handle repeatable automation for batch figures and data transformations?
When is EPS output preferable to SVG or PDF for a figure pipeline using Mathematica, SciDAVis, or JMP?
Which tool supports LaTeX label rendering for scientific typography while keeping the figure export workflow practical?
What security or access-control capabilities differ between Plotly Chart Studio workspaces and desktop tools like SciDAVis or Maple?
How do JMP and MATLAB differ in tying model terms to plots and diagnostics during analysis?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Data Science Analytics alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of data science analytics tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare data science analytics tools→