Top 10 Best Remote Printing Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Telecommunications

Top 10 Best Remote Printing Software of 2026

Top 10 remote printing software for IT teams, ranking Pharos, Celiveo, ThinPrint and VoIP API tools with feature tradeoffs and comparisons.

32 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Remote printing software matters because it controls how documents move from endpoints to printers using job redirection, authentication, and audit logging. This ranked list targets IT teams evaluating throughput, RBAC, and integration options, including API and automation paths, to balance security with manageable administration across distributed sites.

Pharos is the safest pick when IT needs centrally governed remote printing with controlled release and consistent queue behavior, whereas ezeep fits if you want low-touch endpoint setup with a centralized remote print queue for SaaS and managed service delivery.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Pharos

Policy-controlled secure release combined with centralized queue management for multi-site access control.

Built for fits when IT needs centrally governed remote printing with controlled release and consistent queue behavior..

2

Celiveo

Editor pick

Queue-based secure release integrated into the managed print gateway workflow.

Built for fits when IT teams need centrally managed remote queues with secure release for many printers..

3

ThinPrint

Editor pick

ThinPrint print workflow controls combine controlled routing with secure release behavior for centralized queues.

Built for fits when IT needs centralized printer routing with consistent formatting across VDI and mixed endpoints..

Comparison Table

1
PharosBest overall
enterprise
9.1/10
Overall
2
enterprise
8.8/10
Overall
3
enterprise
8.5/10
Overall
4
API-first
8.2/10
Overall
5
enterprise
7.9/10
Overall
6
enterprise
7.6/10
Overall
7
7.3/10
Overall
8
enterprise
7.0/10
Overall
9
enterprise
6.7/10
Overall
10
6.4/10
Overall
#1

Pharos

enterprise

Print management software with secure release and roaming print.

9.1/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use9.3/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Policy-controlled secure release combined with centralized queue management for multi-site access control.

Pharos acts as a print broker that centralizes queue configuration and keeps print handling in a controlled service rather than on each client device. Secure release support pairs with page accounting and operational reporting so administrators can reconcile usage without relying on printer-side counters alone. Driverless printing support reduces per-printer driver injection, which helps when endpoint images must stay consistent across sites. The automation surface supports provisioning workflows so new printers and policies can be rolled out without reconfiguring every workstation.

A key tradeoff is that Pharos is strongest when printers and policies are managed centrally, which adds up-front integration work for teams that only need a one-off remote printer connection. A common usage situation is a multi-site IT team replacing ad hoc print redirection with consistent queue behavior and controlled release across office, lab, and VDI endpoints.

Pros
  • +Central queue governance reduces client-side print reconfiguration
  • +Secure release workflows fit shared printer environments
  • +Print accounting data supports operational chargeback processes
  • +Automation supports repeatable printer and policy provisioning
Cons
  • Initial rollout requires careful mapping of printers to managed queues
  • Endpoint behavior depends on correct integration with the client print flow
  • Advanced routing policies can increase admin operational overhead
  • Some legacy printer behaviors may still require printer-side tuning
Use scenarios
  • IT infrastructure teams

    Centralize remote printing across sites

    Reduced per-device printing changes

  • VDI operations teams

    Keep print behavior consistent for VDI

    Fewer endpoint-specific failures

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Facilities and security teams

    Control shared printer access

    Lower risk from unattended prints

    Secure release enforces that users retrieve jobs only after authentication within the managed workflow.

  • Finance and service management

    Track page usage for accounting

    More consistent usage attribution

    Page accounting data supports reconciliation for internal reporting and chargeback workflows.

Best for: Fits when IT needs centrally governed remote printing with controlled release and consistent queue behavior.

#2

Celiveo

enterprise

Print management and security platform with pull-printing and remote print job routing for large enterprises.

8.8/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Queue-based secure release integrated into the managed print gateway workflow.

Celiveo is designed for organizations that want centralized control over remote print queues rather than ad hoc tunneling. Print handling is oriented around a managed gateway that receives jobs, applies configured routing rules, and forwards to printers. Admin control focuses on mapping users or groups to queues and enforcing job handling rules for consistent output across sites.

A key tradeoff is that Celiveo workflow configuration adds upfront integration work when printer environments differ across buildings or sites. The setup is most efficient when printer sets, naming, and access patterns are standardized enough for queue mapping to stay stable. It fits best for VDI and thin-client environments where predictable print redirection and queue selection matter more than end-user driver choices.

Pros
  • +Central gateway routes jobs with consistent queue mapping
  • +Group-to-queue configuration supports controlled access to printers
  • +Automation hooks help scale deployments across user populations
  • +Secure release integration supports follow-me print workflows
Cons
  • Initial printer and queue mapping effort is non-trivial
  • Printer environment variance can force additional configuration rules
  • Advanced troubleshooting depends on understanding gateway job flow
  • Some edge cases require manual alignment of destination printers
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Remote offices need consistent printer access

    Consistent outputs across sites

  • VDI platform teams

    Thin clients need predictable print redirection

    Fewer driver-related failures

Show 1 more scenario
  • Workplace support teams

    Departments use shared print devices

    Lower risk from unattended prints

    Secure release gates job printing and reduces unauthorized access to output.

Best for: Fits when IT teams need centrally managed remote queues with secure release for many printers.

#3

ThinPrint

enterprise

Enterprise print management for virtual desktops and branch offices.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

ThinPrint print workflow controls combine controlled routing with secure release behavior for centralized queues.

ThinPrint is used to centralize printing for distributed workforces by managing how client apps submit jobs and how those jobs are delivered to print servers and printers. The solution supports printer mapping and print workflow controls that help avoid repeated driver installation on endpoints. It is commonly paired with existing print servers to keep IP printer reachability and queue management on the network side.

A key tradeoff is that rollout needs careful printer mapping configuration across sites and user groups to match device capabilities and destination rules. It fits best when organizations already run centralized print queues and need consistent output across VDI sessions, remote desktops, and BYOD-adjacent device mixes.

Pros
  • +Centralized printer mapping reduces endpoint driver management overhead
  • +Controlled release workflows support secure pull printing patterns
  • +Job handling consistency improves duplex and page setup predictability
  • +Works with existing print server queues for gradual migration
Cons
  • Printer mapping configuration requires disciplined rollout planning
  • Complex environments may need multiple components and admin roles
  • Troubleshooting can span client routing and server delivery layers
  • Some legacy printer behaviors may still require driver alignment
Use scenarios
  • VDI and EUC teams

    Redirect print jobs from virtual desktops

    Fewer driver issues and rerouted jobs

  • IT print operations

    Standardize printer access across sites

    Lower support tickets for printing

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Security and compliance leads

    Implement secure release for printouts

    Reduced exposure of sensitive documents

    Use release workflows to prevent unattended pages and improve print auditing.

  • Workspace IT teams

    Support thin clients and remote offices

    Reliable printing from unmanaged locations

    Provide consistent print routing for remote users with centralized server-side delivery.

Best for: Fits when IT needs centralized printer routing with consistent formatting across VDI and mixed endpoints.

#4

ezeep

API-first

Cloud-based printing platform offering a printing API and remote print management for SaaS applications and managed service providers.

8.2/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Centralized remote print queue mapping with secure release workflows for controlled job pickup.

Ezeep delivers remote printing by routing print jobs from users to printers through a managed cloud print gateway. It focuses on printer discovery, remote print queue handling, and driverless or minimal-driver workflows that reduce per-device print setup.

Admin controls center on queue configuration and user access patterns that fit typical IT support and BYOD or VDI scenarios. The platform also supports release-oriented printing workflows that align with secure release needs for office and branch deployments.

Pros
  • +Queue-based remote printing reduces endpoint driver installation work
  • +Secure release style workflows fit shared-device printing needs
  • +Printer discovery and remote queue mapping lower onboarding time
  • +Central admin configuration supports consistent print behavior
Cons
  • Some environments need careful gateway placement for latency control
  • Advanced printer feature parity can depend on model-specific support

Best for: Fits when IT teams need centralized remote print queue control with low-touch endpoint setup.

#5

UniPrint

enterprise

Universal printing platform for virtualized environments including Citrix, VMware, and Microsoft RDS with remote print redirection.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Queue mapping on the UniPrint print gateway to centralize routing and reduce endpoint-specific printer configuration.

UniPrint delivers remote printing by brokering print jobs from user devices to network printers through a managed print gateway. It supports driverless and web-based job submission paths to reduce per-endpoint print driver work.

Admin controls focus on queue mapping and print permissions, with auditing-style visibility into job activity rather than ad hoc local installs. The overall fit is strongest for IT teams that need consistent print routing across many endpoints without relying on end-user configuration.

Pros
  • +Central queue mapping reduces endpoint-specific printer setup
  • +Driverless workflow options cut driver deployment complexity
  • +Web-submission path limits client-side print configuration needs
  • +Job activity visibility supports operational troubleshooting
Cons
  • Limited support for highly custom printer logic across mixed fleets
  • Administration requires consistent gateway configuration to avoid misroutes

Best for: Fits when IT needs consistent remote print routing across many endpoints without deep client driver management.

#6

Cortado

enterprise

Enterprise mobility platform providing secure mobile and remote printing alongside MDM and file management capabilities.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Policy-driven print release paired with centrally managed queue mapping for predictable printer selection.

Cortado is a remote printing software for organizations that need controlled printing from managed endpoints to on-prem printers. It provides a cloud-to-client print gateway model that maps remote print queues to local printing paths without requiring every user to install and manage printer drivers manually.

Cortado focuses on queue routing, print job delivery, and policy-driven access for released printing workflows. Admin configuration centers on deploying the gateway components and controlling which printers and users can send jobs to which queues.

Pros
  • +Queue-based routing supports consistent printer delivery across changing user devices
  • +Central admin configuration reduces per-user printer setup in managed environments
  • +Supports controlled release workflows for shared printers and BYOD-like access models
  • +Handles common print delivery paths needed for VDI print redirection scenarios
Cons
  • Driver and printer mapping behavior can require careful initial configuration for edge printers
  • Advanced reporting and audit depth depends on the deployment and log retention settings

Best for: Fits when IT needs consistent remote print queue routing with controlled access for mixed endpoints.

#7

PrintHand

SMB

Mobile printing app supporting remote and cloud printing.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Secure release plus centrally managed queue rules to control who prints which documents across distributed endpoints.

PrintHand targets remote printing workflows by routing print jobs from managed endpoints to a cloud print gateway style service. It focuses on printer mapping, job release options, and administration for multi-site deployments where end users should not install printer drivers.

The product supports automation through configuration-driven queue behavior and exposes integration paths for IT-managed client printing. Its main differentiator is the operational emphasis on managing print routing rules and release behavior centrally rather than relying on per-user setup.

Pros
  • +Central control of remote print routing rules for mixed printer models
  • +Driverless style client experience reduces endpoint driver management
  • +Secure release workflow fits user-specific print pickup processes
  • +Admin configuration supports recurring queues without manual rework
Cons
  • Complexity increases when many printers require distinct mapping rules
  • Troubleshooting depends on log access and queue state visibility
  • Some printer behaviors require careful testing across OS versions
  • Advanced deployment patterns need tighter governance discipline

Best for: Fits when IT needs centrally governed remote print queues across offices while minimizing client driver installs.

#8

Vasion Print

enterprise

Cloud print management software for centralized printer deployment, remote printing, and print queue administration.

7.0/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Secure release style job control tied to the print gateway reduces endpoint exposure for unattended users.

Vasion Print is remote printing software aimed at managed IT environments that need predictable queue handling across distributed sites. It centers on print gateway behavior that accepts jobs from endpoint apps and forwards them to printers with consistent mapping and release control.

The product focuses on operational fit for VoIP-adjacent and general enterprise workflows where print job auditing and centralized administration matter. Vasion Print also supports automation-oriented configuration for repeatable rollout across many printers and user groups.

Pros
  • +Centralized print gateway routing keeps remote queue behavior consistent
  • +Automation-friendly configuration supports repeatable rollout across printer fleets
  • +Print auditing and page accounting support operational reporting and troubleshooting
  • +Works well for secure release style workflows where users release jobs at the device
Cons
  • Job mapping logic requires deliberate configuration for mixed printer models
  • Advanced rollout automation depends on IT admin process rather than self-service

Best for: Fits when IT teams need managed remote print routing, auditing, and controlled release across many sites.

#9

MyQ X

enterprise

Print management software with secure release, remote administration, mobile printing, and print accounting.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.6/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Secure release with centrally managed queue access reduces unauthorized printing on shared or roaming endpoints.

MyQ X provides remote printing by routing print jobs to centralized print queues and release workflows for distributed endpoints. The product supports both driver-based and driverless delivery so print jobs can target printers with less manual client configuration.

MyQ X also includes administrative control for queue organization and job governance so IT teams can manage who can print and how jobs are handled. Integration options revolve around HTTP-based service endpoints and configuration that supports automated queue provisioning.

Pros
  • +Centralized print queue routing supports remote endpoints without per-site queue sprawl
  • +Driverless printing reduces client driver maintenance for mixed printer estates
  • +Secure release workflow fits shared devices and follow-me printing patterns
  • +HTTP-based API surface supports queue and configuration automation
Cons
  • Initial queue mapping requires careful printer naming and job routing design
  • Advanced governance workflows depend on consistent user-to-queue entitlement setup

Best for: Fits when distributed IT needs centralized remote print queues with controlled release and reduced client driver overhead.

#10

Xerox Workplace Cloud

enterprise

Cloud print management with secure release, mobile printing, printer monitoring, and user authentication.

6.4/10
Overall
Features6.1/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Remote queue access tied to tenant onboarding and identity flows for managed release behavior across sites.

Xerox Workplace Cloud targets IT teams that need managed remote printing for mixed fleets of Xerox and non-Xerox printers without requiring staff to handle print driver setup. The service focuses on browser and mobile print experiences, remote queue access, and identity-based access paths that can support BYOD print workflows.

Administration centers on tenant configuration, user onboarding, and document-to-printer routing so print jobs land in the intended remote queue. In practice, it works best when the deployment expects consistent printer reachability and policy-driven release behavior rather than fully driverless end-to-end printing for every device type.

Pros
  • +Identity-oriented remote queue access supports BYOD and mobile print use cases
  • +Tenant administration ties onboarding and routing to a managed workflow
  • +Works well for browser-style submission models that avoid local print steps
  • +Designed around Xerox fleet management patterns and printer reachability
Cons
  • Driverless coverage is limited for edge printers that rely on specific drivers
  • Remote printer reachability and firewall rules require careful governance discipline
  • Integration depth with non-Xerox MFP ecosystems can lag dedicated print gateways
  • Advanced job controls depend on how the tenant routes documents and releases jobs

Best for: Fits when organizations want managed remote print queues with mobile and browser-style submission for a Xerox-heavy fleet.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 telecommunications, Pharos stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Pharos

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right remote printing software

Remote printing software centralizes print routing so users submit jobs remotely while IT controls which managed printers those jobs can reach. This guide covers Pharos, Celiveo, ThinPrint, ezeep, UniPrint, Cortado, PrintHand, Vasion Print, MyQ X, and Xerox Workplace Cloud.

Across these tools, the deciding factors are how centrally governed queue mapping enforces consistent printer selection and how secure release workflows determine when a job becomes printable. The evaluation also tracks how much endpoint behavior depends on correct client integration and how much admin effort is required to map printers to queues.

Remote printing software for centrally governed print queues and secure release workflows

Remote printing software routes print jobs from distributed endpoints to centralized remote print queues and then applies controlled release so only entitled users can print. Tools such as Pharos focus on policy-controlled secure release paired with centralized queue management for multi-site access control.

Other platforms like Celiveo emphasize queue-based secure release integrated into a managed print gateway workflow so IT can route jobs with consistent queue mapping and group-to-queue configuration. Across the list, secure release and queue mapping reduce endpoint printer reconfiguration and driver overhead, but initial rollout hinges on disciplined printer-to-queue mapping and gateway placement decisions.

Centrally governed queue mapping and secure release controls for remote print jobs

Remote printing software succeeds when queue mapping rules reliably translate remote client submissions into the exact managed printers the IT team intends to use. That mapping reduces endpoint printer reconfiguration work and prevents misroutes when devices roam between offices.

Secure release then gates job eligibility so the print workflow exposes only approved printers and approved users at the moment a job becomes printable. Tools in this list implement secure release using different control points, and those differences change rollout effort and troubleshooting behavior.

  • Policy-controlled secure release tied to queue behavior

    Pharos combines policy-controlled secure release with centralized queue management for multi-site access control. Celiveo pairs queue-based secure release with its managed print gateway workflow so group-to-queue configuration can control who reaches which printers.

  • Centralized remote print queue mapping for consistent printer selection

    ThinPrint emphasizes centralized printer mapping to keep routing consistent across VDI and mixed endpoints. ezeep and UniPrint both centralize remote queue mapping on the gateway so endpoints need less printer-specific setup.

  • Secure release workflows designed for shared and roaming endpoints

    ezeep focuses on centralized remote queue mapping with secure release workflows that fit shared-device printing. MyQ X uses secure release with centrally managed queue access to reduce unauthorized printing on shared or roaming endpoints.

  • Managed print gateway routing and repeatable fleet configuration

    Vasion Print ties secure release style job control to its print gateway so remote queue behavior stays consistent across sites. Cortado pairs policy-driven print release with centrally managed queue mapping for predictable printer selection across changing user devices.

  • Administration and governance depth for multi-site rollouts

    Pharos reduces client-side print reconfiguration by centralizing queue governance, which matters when multiple offices share printer pools. PrintHand strengthens centrally governed remote print queues across offices, but troubleshooting depends on log access and queue state visibility.

  • Driverless workflow coverage for mixed printer estates

    UniPrint highlights driverless workflow options to reduce driver deployment complexity across many endpoints. MyQ X also points to driverless printing to cut client driver maintenance for mixed printer estates.

Choose based on where control is enforced and how queue mapping is provisioned

The first fork is the control plane location. Pharos centralizes policy-controlled secure release and queue governance in a way that reduces per-endpoint reconfiguration, while tools like Celiveo and Cortado push routing and entitlements through a managed print gateway workflow.

The second fork is how queue mapping and endpoint integration are handled. ThinPrint and ezeep focus on centralized mapping and consistent workflows that can work well in VDI and low-touch endpoint scenarios, while UniPrint and PrintHand emphasize gateway-driven mapping with less endpoint driver work, which shifts the burden to correct gateway configuration.

  • Map the control point: secure release policy in the gateway vs in the central queue governance layer

    Select Pharos when centrally governed secure release and multi-site queue governance must work together with controlled release workflows. Select Celiveo when secure release must be integrated into the managed print gateway so group-to-queue configuration can enforce access consistently.

  • Pick a queue mapping strategy that matches the endpoint mix

    Choose ThinPrint when centralized printer mapping must stay consistent across VDI and mixed endpoints with controlled formatting behavior. Choose ezeep when low-touch endpoint setup is required and queue-based remote printing should reduce endpoint driver installation work.

  • Decide whether gateway configuration discipline is acceptable for edge printers

    Choose Cortado when centrally managed queue routing is needed and careful initial configuration for edge printers fits the admin process. Choose UniPrint when reducing endpoint-specific printer configuration is the priority and the environment does not require deeply custom printer logic for every model.

  • Align rollout troubleshooting with log and queue state visibility requirements

    Choose PrintHand when centrally governed queue rules should minimize client driver installs, and when troubleshooting can be supported with access to log access and queue state visibility. Choose Vasion Print when repeatable rollout across printer fleets depends on automation-friendly gateway configuration and deliberate mapping for mixed printer models.

  • Use driverless coverage only where the fleet supports it

    Select UniPrint when driverless workflow options reduce driver deployment complexity across a broad mixed fleet. Avoid assuming full driverless coverage in edge-heavy environments and validate that MyQ X and UniPrint driverless-style workflows cover the actual printer models in use.

  • If identity-driven onboarding is required, evaluate tenant-based queue access workflows

    Choose Xerox Workplace Cloud when remote queue access must tie into tenant onboarding and identity flows for controlled release across a Xerox-heavy fleet. Choose Pharos instead when the rollout requirement is centrally governed policy-controlled secure release with consistent queue behavior across multiple sites.

Who remote printing software should fit best in IT operations

IT teams running distributed offices benefit when remote printing routes jobs into managed remote print queues and uses secure release to prevent unauthorized printing. The tools in this list target different operational constraints like gateway configuration discipline, endpoint integration dependencies, and the amount of driver management that must be handled per printer model. Organizations with shared devices and roaming users also benefit from centralized queue access plus secure release so print eligibility stays tied to entitlements and workflow state rather than local client configuration.

  • Multi-site IT teams standardizing printer pools across offices

    Pharos is a strong fit when centrally governed secure release and centralized queue management must enforce multi-site access control with consistent queue behavior. Cortado also fits when centrally managed queue routing must stay predictable as user devices change across locations.

  • VDI environments that need consistent printer routing and formatting behavior

    ThinPrint fits VDI-focused needs because centralized printer mapping reduces endpoint driver management overhead and supports consistent secure release behavior. PrintHand can fit mixed endpoints when driverless-style client experience reduces client driver installs.

  • IT teams prioritizing managed gateway workflows with group-based queue entitlements

    Celiveo fits teams that want group-to-queue configuration in the managed print gateway workflow and need secure release integrated into that workflow. Vasion Print fits teams that want automation-friendly configuration for gateway-driven routing and auditing.

  • Organizations with shared-device fleets and roaming endpoints

    MyQ X fits when centrally managed queue access and secure release style job control reduce unauthorized printing on roaming and shared endpoints. ezeep fits when secure release workflows support shared-device printing with low-touch endpoint setup.

  • Enterprises planning an identity-first onboarding model for remote queue access

    Xerox Workplace Cloud fits when remote queue access must connect to tenant onboarding and identity flows for controlled release across sites. Pharos fits when identity is a layer on top of centralized queue governance that must reduce endpoint reconfiguration.

Common rollout pitfalls in remote printing software deployments

Most remote printing failures trace back to queue mapping and release gating that do not reflect the real printer naming and client workflow behavior. Several tools in this list warn that correct mapping and gateway placement or configuration discipline is necessary for predictable routing.

Another frequent issue is treating driverless coverage as universal. Driverless-style workflows can reduce endpoint work, but mixed printer estates with edge models can still require careful model-specific validation and mapping design.

  • Treating printer-to-queue mapping as a one-time import instead of an ongoing governance task

    Pharos requires careful mapping of printers to managed queues during rollout, and misalignment can change endpoint behavior. Celiveo also requires non-trivial initial printer and queue mapping effort to prevent inconsistent queue routing.

  • Placing too much trust in gateway reachability and firewall configuration without governance review

    Xerox Workplace Cloud ties remote printer reachability and firewall rules to tenant administration workflow behavior. Vasion Print also depends on deliberate configuration for mixed printer models, and incorrect mapping logic can break expected job control.

  • Assuming secure release will work correctly when endpoint integration is inconsistent

    Pharos notes that endpoint behavior depends on correct integration with the client print flow. ThinPrint highlights that printer mapping configuration requires disciplined rollout planning in complex environments.

  • Choosing centralized queue mapping but skipping a plan for edge printers and feature parity

    ezeep warns that advanced printer feature parity can depend on model-specific support, which can surface during mapping validation. UniPrint cautions that limited support for highly custom printer logic across mixed fleets can cause misroutes for specialized requirements.

  • Overusing distinct mapping rules without budgeted admin effort for troubleshooting visibility

    PrintHand states that complexity increases when many printers require distinct mapping rules. It also notes that troubleshooting depends on log access and queue state visibility, so missing operational visibility can extend incident resolution time.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated Pharos, Celiveo, ThinPrint, ezeep, UniPrint, Cortado, PrintHand, Vasion Print, MyQ X, and Xerox Workplace Cloud using feature coverage weight at 40% and then scored ease of administration and overall value at 30% each. The scoring emphasizes how centralized queue mapping and secure release workflows reduce endpoint reconfiguration work while keeping remote print queues predictable across distributed offices.

Pharos separated itself by combining policy-controlled secure release with centralized queue governance for multi-site access control while also reducing client-side print reconfiguration through centralized queue management. The ranking also reflected how each tool’s standout secure release approach interacts with queue mapping effort and endpoint integration dependencies during rollout.

Frequently Asked Questions About remote printing software

How do Pharos and ThinPrint route print jobs from endpoints to on-prem printers without client driver sprawl?
Pharos routes jobs through managed print queues and delivers to on-prem printers with centralized printer mapping and policy controls. ThinPrint routes jobs from endpoints to central print servers and applies printer mapping plus workflow controls so formatting and release behavior remain consistent across VDI and mixed endpoints.
What integration and API options should IT teams expect when automating provisioning for remote print queues?
Pharos is designed around an API-driven workflow with connector-style deployment patterns for enterprise environments. PrintHand exposes integration paths for IT-managed client printing and supports configuration-driven queue behavior, while MyQ X provisions queues using configuration that supports automated queue provisioning via service endpoints.
Which tools provide secure release workflows tied to centralized queue access rather than endpoint settings?
Pharos combines policy-controlled secure release with centralized queue management for multi-site access control. Vasion Print focuses on secure release style job control at the print gateway, and MyQ X ties secure release with centrally managed queue access to reduce unauthorized printing on shared or roaming endpoints.
When is driverless or minimal-driver printing viable, and where does it fall short?
ezeep is built for driverless or minimal-driver workflows through a managed cloud print gateway and queue-based handling. Xerox Workplace Cloud supports browser and mobile submission with identity-based routing, but it can rely on consistent printer reachability and policy-driven release rather than fully driverless end-to-end printing for every device type.
What happens to print throughput and job consistency when the print gateway performs formatting or conversion before forwarding?
ThinPrint handles job formatting and predictable page setup before transmission to centralized targets, which keeps page layout stable across mixed OS environments. UniPrint centralizes routing with queue mapping and can reduce endpoint-specific printer configuration, but it still depends on the gateway path to deliver consistently formatted jobs to the intended network printers.
How do Celiveo and Cortado differ in admin controls for mapping remote queues to destinations and access rules?
Celiveo emphasizes workflow configuration inside a managed print gateway that accepts jobs from managed clients and routes them to destination printers with queue mapping and secure release integration. Cortado uses centrally deployed gateway components where admins control which printers and users can send jobs to which queues, then maps remote print queues to local printing paths.
Which product is better suited for multi-site BYOD or VDI patterns that require centralized release and low-touch endpoint setup?
ezeep fits office and branch deployments that need centralized remote print queue control with low-touch endpoint setup and release-oriented workflows for BYOD or VDI scenarios. PrintHand targets centrally governed remote print queues across offices while minimizing client driver installs through secure release plus centrally managed queue rules.
What breaks if the remote print queue routing rules are misconfigured for location-aware delivery?
Pharos includes location-aware routing and centralized queue management, so incorrect mapping rules can cause jobs to land on the wrong on-prem printer despite secure release controls. Cortado maps remote print queues to local printing paths based on gateway configuration, so wrong printer-to-queue mappings can route jobs to unintended destinations even when user access policies are correct.
Where does troubleshooting become harder when clients depend on browser-based or cloud gateway submission instead of direct driver printing?
Xerox Workplace Cloud ties remote queue access to tenant onboarding and identity flows for managed release behavior, so failures in reachability or identity configuration can stop job delivery earlier in the workflow. UniPrint reduces endpoint printer work via driverless and web-based submission paths, but debugging queue mapping and print permissions still requires validating gateway configuration for the endpoint-to-queue path.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.