Top 10 Best Remote Desktop Printing Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Remote And Hybrid Work In Industry

Top 10 Best Remote Desktop Printing Software of 2026

Ranking of remote desktop printing software for IT teams, comparing remote print drivers and management options like ezeep, ScrewDrivers, and UniPrint Infinity.

30 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Remote desktop printing tools route print jobs from RDS or VDI sessions to endpoints while managing drivers, job formats, and network throughput. This ranked list targets IT teams comparing remote print client approaches, driver models, and management layers like universal drivers, PDF job conversion, and policy-based routing so operators can reduce print failures and administration overhead.

ezeep is the best fit for organizations that need consistent redirected printing across varied endpoints and driver sets, while ScrewDrivers works better when centralized IT must keep remote print mapping stable across RDS and VDI with heterogeneous printer models.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

ezeep

Printer mapping persistence with a dedicated virtual printing driver reduces repeated driver mismatch failures in RDP sessions.

Built for fits when organizations need consistent redirected printing across varied endpoints and driver sets..

2

ScrewDrivers

Editor pick

Session-aware redirected printer mapping that preserves destinations across reconnections.

Built for fits when centralized IT needs consistent remote print mapping across VDI sessions and heterogeneous endpoint printers..

3

UniPrint Infinity

Editor pick

Printer mapping persistence and rule-based session routing for remote printer visibility control.

Built for fits when admins need consistent mapped redirected printing across mixed client fleets..

Comparison Table

1
ezeepBest overall
SMB
9.2/10
Overall
2
enterprise
8.9/10
Overall
3
8.6/10
Overall
4
specialist
8.3/10
Overall
5
enterprise
8.0/10
Overall
6
enterprise
7.6/10
Overall
7
7.3/10
Overall
8
7.0/10
Overall
9
6.7/10
Overall
10
enterprise
6.4/10
Overall
#1

ezeep

SMB

Cloud printing platform with dedicated support for RDP and Citrix remote desktop sessions.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.5/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.1/10
Standout feature

Printer mapping persistence with a dedicated virtual printing driver reduces repeated driver mismatch failures in RDP sessions.

ezeep focuses on reliable printer mapping for remote sessions by sending print jobs through an intermediate printing service rather than relying solely on built-in RDP client-side print mapping. The product supports a virtual printer driver and persistent printer mapping behavior so users can print to specific local devices after authentication. ezeep’s deployment model uses a server-side service plus a client-side agent, which reduces driver mismatch failures when the remote environment lacks the required print driver set.

A tradeoff appears in environments that already use native RDP redirection because ezeep inserts its own print path and may require aligning printer driver installation where universal driverless printing fallback is expected. A common fit is mixed-device teams where thin clients and locked-down endpoints need consistent session-to-local printer behavior without recurring queue rebuilds.

Pros
  • +Persistent printer mapping reduces session-to-session print queue setup time
  • +Client component improves driver compatibility for redirected print jobs
  • +Clear separation between server service and client agent supports controlled rollout
  • +End-user print availability is handled through mapped session printers
Cons
  • RDP-native setups may require revalidating printer availability and mappings
  • Printer driver requirements still matter for certain device classes
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Standardize printing for remote workforce

    Fewer helpdesk printer issues

  • Helpdesk support teams

    Fix driver mismatch complaints faster

    Lower driver-related ticket volume

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Regulated enterprises

    Control who can map which printers

    More consistent policy adherence

    Governance can limit printer visibility per user group so redirected printing stays within policy boundaries.

  • Mixed endpoint environments

    Support thin clients with local printers

    More reliable remote device printing

    A client agent handles local printer presence so remote apps can print without reconfiguring queues.

Best for: Fits when organizations need consistent redirected printing across varied endpoints and driver sets.

#2

ScrewDrivers

enterprise

Print management solution for RDS and VDI that eliminates driver conflicts by using a universal driver model.

8.9/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Session-aware redirected printer mapping that preserves destinations across reconnections.

ScrewDrivers is designed around client-side printing redirection and a virtual printer driver model that turns a remote session into a controllable print path. Printer mapping persistence reduces rework when users reconnect to new sessions or VDI hosts. Administrative controls govern which session printer destinations appear and how they bind to user context.

A tradeoff is that reliability depends on initial printer mapping configuration for endpoints and on consistent printer names or identifiers across environments. It fits best when thin clients, shared lab PCs, or mixed Windows builds create driver mismatch risk for conventional remote print setups.

Pros
  • +Printer mapping persistence reduces reconnection print setup churn
  • +Virtual printer driver approach limits driver mismatch failures
  • +Administrative control restricts redirected destinations per user context
  • +Predictable redirected print data stream behavior under printer changes
Cons
  • Endpoint printer naming consistency is required to avoid mapping drift
  • Initial configuration effort is higher than basic RDP print redirection
  • Advanced tuning requires testing across each RDP host image
Use scenarios
  • VDI infrastructure teams

    Keep redirected printing stable across hosts

    Fewer failed print jobs

  • IT helpdesk

    Cut tickets from session printer changes

    Lower support workload

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Field operations IT

    Print from thin-client sites

    More consistent output

    Thin endpoints use controlled virtual printer mapping instead of relying on ad hoc driver installs.

  • Security-minded IT

    Restrict what printers sessions can use

    Tighter print governance

    Administration limits which redirected destinations are available for each user session.

Best for: Fits when centralized IT needs consistent remote print mapping across VDI sessions and heterogeneous endpoint printers.

#3

UniPrint Infinity

enterprise

Virtual printing platform that converts print jobs to PDF for delivery across RDS, Citrix, and VMware environments.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.4/10
Standout feature

Printer mapping persistence and rule-based session routing for remote printer visibility control.

UniPrint Infinity is oriented around remote desktop printing workflows where user sessions need access to local printers without relying on every endpoint matching server print driver versions. It supports printer mapping that can persist session printer visibility and route redirected jobs into appropriate queues. The tooling also provides driver mediation through a virtual printer device so endpoints send print jobs through a controlled path rather than direct queue targeting.

A key tradeoff is that predictable results depend on disciplined printer mapping coverage for each endpoint and each remote session host role. It fits environments where admins want consistent redirected printing for office applications but need to prevent driver mismatch issues from causing missing queues or blank print outputs. A common situation is mixed hardware fleets with inconsistent printer drivers, where centralized mapping rules reduce per-machine exception handling.

Pros
  • +Centralized printer mapping reduces per-endpoint print queue setup
  • +Virtual printer device handling improves driver mismatch resilience
  • +Session-scoped routing supports consistent redirected print behavior
  • +Works well for print access parity across mixed Windows endpoints
Cons
  • Mapping rules require careful coverage across endpoint and host roles
  • Deep application-specific tuning can take time to standardize
Use scenarios
  • IT infrastructure teams

    Standardize redirected printing across RDP hosts

    Fewer queue setup exceptions

  • Windows endpoint administrators

    Reduce driver mismatch failures

    More consistent job completion

Show 1 more scenario
  • Help desk operators

    Lower print troubleshooting volume

    Shorter time to resolution

    Session printer visibility is controlled centrally so users report fewer missing or wrong queues.

Best for: Fits when admins need consistent mapped redirected printing across mixed client fleets.

#4

TSPrint

specialist

Dedicated remote desktop printing client that installs on RDP and Terminal Services servers to redirect print jobs to local printers.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Client-to-session printer mapping management that standardizes redirected printers for mixed endpoint environments.

TSPrint from terminalworks.com focuses on remote desktop printing through driver-based printing redirection and server-side management of redirected printers. It provides a virtual printer workflow that reduces driver mismatch issues by standardizing the client print path and mapping into the user session.

Admin configuration supports policy-style printer mapping, including persistence behavior across sessions. The result targets predictable print job handling under RDP-based environments rather than ad hoc local printing per app.

Pros
  • +Virtual printer driver model improves consistency across RDP clients and apps
  • +Configurable printer mapping behavior supports predictable session printer availability
  • +Designed to reduce driver mismatch failures during redirected printing
  • +Works well for environments that need controlled print routing per user session
Cons
  • Driver-based approach can require careful rollout across endpoints and servers
  • Automation and API surface for provisioning and reporting is limited compared with IT-first suites
  • Troubleshooting print path issues can be time-consuming during rollout
  • Advanced governance needs may require pairing with existing RDP management tooling

Best for: Fits when IT teams need consistent redirected printing for many apps across RDP sessions.

#5

ThinPrint

enterprise

Enterprise print management platform optimized for VDI and RDS environments with bandwidth-aware print job compression.

8.0/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

ThinPrint print management for consistent printer mapping across remote sessions, reducing driver mismatch risks.

ThinPrint delivers remote desktop printing by redirecting client print jobs to controlled printer endpoints, with options for universal drivers and advanced print data handling. It focuses on reducing driver mismatch during session printer mapping and improving print reliability through its print management components.

Administration centers on configuring printer rules, managing virtual printer behavior, and steering devices toward the intended print targets across heterogeneous fleets. Integration is strongest where ThinPrint components can be deployed on print servers and workstations to control the full path from session to print queue.

Pros
  • +Strong driver mismatch mitigation via ThinPrint-managed print paths
  • +Granular print rule configuration for printer mapping across session types
  • +Compatibility focus with client-side and server-side redirection workflows
  • +Operational controls for consistent routing to print queues
Cons
  • Requires careful deployment planning across print servers and endpoints
  • Complexity rises when multiple driver and queue strategies must coexist

Best for: Fits when IT needs controlled remote print redirection across mixed client hardware and printer drivers.

#6

Celiveo

enterprise

Print management system for virtualized and remote environments with pull-printing and zero-server architecture.

7.6/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Virtual printer driver based redirection with administratively controlled printer mapping across remote sessions.

Celiveo is a remote desktop printing add-on aimed at controlling how printers get exposed during remote sessions. It focuses on virtual printer driver based redirection so print jobs route predictably from user sessions to reachable queues.

Administration centers on mapping and policy so session printers follow defined rules instead of ad hoc device behavior. Integration depth is strongest when Celiveo is allowed to manage the virtual print pathway end to end in the RDS printing chain.

Pros
  • +Virtual printer driver approach reduces driver mismatch during remote printing
  • +Printer mapping policies keep session output aligned to defined queues
  • +Centralized handling of redirected print pathway supports consistent behavior
  • +Works well for standardized office printing where queues are predefined
Cons
  • Admin workflow requires careful mapping and session policy planning
  • Limited fit for highly dynamic printer discovery across many thin clients

Best for: Fits when IT needs consistent session printer routing through managed mappings.

#7

Parallels RAS

SMB

Remote application server that includes universal printing for RDS and VDI sessions with automatic local printer mapping.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Parallels virtual printer driver integrated with RAS session printer handling for consistent in-session printer presentation.

Parallels RAS for remote desktop printing is built around Parallels Remote Application Server session publishing and consistent printer handling for users who connect to the RAS environment. It supports redirected printing workflows using a Parallels virtual printer driver so print jobs route from client sessions to the configured output.

Administration focuses on RAS-side control of printer mapping and the printer experience seen inside published applications. Print reliability depends on driver compatibility and correct mapping configuration for the client and session combination.

Pros
  • +Integrated with RAS session publishing and consistent printer availability inside apps
  • +Virtual printer driver supports redirected printing without manual per-app printer recreation
  • +Printer mapping behavior stays tied to the RAS publishing session context
  • +Works with Windows client print flows where driver loading is already established
Cons
  • Driver mismatch risk increases when client printers use uncommon driver packages
  • Printer mapping persistence can require careful configuration across user and session policies
  • Print feature coverage varies when endpoints lack required driver capabilities
  • Troubleshooting often needs correlation between RAS session settings and client print driver state

Best for: Fits when teams already run RAS and need redirected printing across published apps with managed printer mappings.

#8

Printix

SMB

Cloud-based print management service that supports remote and hybrid workers by routing print jobs through a cloud overlay.

7.0/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Central printer provisioning with persistent per-user session mappings reduces driver mismatch during remote print redirection.

Printix is remote desktop printing software that replaces brittle client printer setup with a managed print driver and per-user printer assignment. It routes redirected print jobs through a Printix-managed print flow so users see predictable session printers without manual queue browsing.

Admins configure printer availability centrally and control mappings by device and user group. The product focuses on driver management, printer mapping persistence, and operational visibility for remote and thin-client environments.

Pros
  • +Central printer assignment reduces per-user troubleshooting for redirected sessions
  • +Improves driver consistency for mixed printer fleets across remote endpoints
  • +Session printer mapping persists without repeated client-side queue discovery
  • +Admin workflow supports group-based provisioning for role-based printer access
Cons
  • Driver rollout needs careful sequencing to avoid queue mismatch during changes
  • Reporting and governance controls require workflow discipline in larger deployments

Best for: Fits when IT must standardize remote desktop printer access across many users and device types with fewer support tickets.

#9

USB for Remote Desktop

specialist

USB device redirection software that forwards local printer connections to remote desktop sessions at the USB protocol level.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Printer mapping persistence for session printer assignment reduces rerun setup after RDP reconnects.

USB for Remote Desktop from fabulatech.com redirects printing from remote sessions using an Easy Print style virtual driver and printer mapping. It focuses on keeping redirected printers stable across RDP sessions by handling the client to server print path and session printer assignment.

The product is aimed at IT teams that need consistent printing behavior across many endpoints without relying on manual per-user printer setup. USB for Remote Desktop is positioned for enterprises that want predictable remote print job throughput and fewer driver mismatch issues during onboarding and day to day use.

Pros
  • +Uses a dedicated virtual driver to standardize redirected printing across endpoints
  • +Handles printer mapping for session printers to reduce manual printer assignment
  • +Designed for predictable remote print job handling under common RDP workflows
  • +Supports enterprise rollout patterns where users do not install printer drivers themselves
Cons
  • Governance and troubleshooting depend on how printer mappings are deployed
  • Print behavior can vary when local printer drivers are missing or mismatched
  • Less suited to mixed environments that need frequent per-app print policy changes
  • Limited transparency into low level spool handling for edge cases

Best for: Fits when enterprises need consistent RDP printing via virtual driver mapping for many users.

#10

PrinterOn

enterprise

Cloud-based mobile and remote printing platform operated by Brother Industries.

6.4/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.2/10
Standout feature

Print release workflow tied to centrally managed printer entries for controlled access and clearer job traceability.

PrinterOn delivers remote desktop printing through web-managed printer discovery and print release workflows for distributed users. It supports direct job submission from endpoints and remote user access patterns without relying on per-printer client driver matching.

Administration centers on managed printer entries, access policies, and job tracking that connect user sessions to physical devices. It is a strong fit when printing needs to be controlled by an admin while end users work from varied devices and networks.

Pros
  • +Admin-managed print queue entries reduce driver mismatch across endpoints
  • +Remote release workflow provides controlled print submission and job tracking
  • +Printer discovery and selection flows help users print without local printer installs
  • +Job history visibility supports troubleshooting of failed or misrouted prints
Cons
  • Operational setup requires careful printer mapping to physical device endpoints
  • RDP-specific redirected printer behavior depends on client capability and environment

Best for: Fits when IT needs controlled remote print release across varied user devices and networks.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 remote and hybrid work in industry, ezeep stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
ezeep

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right remote desktop printing software

Remote desktop printing software manages printer redirection so remote sessions can render, spool, and submit print jobs to the right destination without manual printer recreation each time. This buyer’s guide covers ezeep, ThinPrint, Printix, TSPrint, and the other top options from the list, focusing on how each tool handles redirected printers across reconnections.

The decision points in this category center on remote print driver behavior, printer mapping persistence, and session-to-session destination stability in RDP and VDI workflows. The coverage also distinguishes tools with deeper central provisioning from tools that rely more on endpoint naming consistency and rollout discipline.

Remote Desktop Printing Software for RDP and VDI Printer Redirection

Remote desktop printing software sits between remote sessions and print queues to control how redirected printers appear, how jobs are routed, and how driver compatibility issues are mitigated during remote session printing. Many deployments depend on a virtual printer driver approach to normalize print paths and reduce driver mismatch failures.

In practice, ezeep emphasizes printer mapping persistence with a dedicated virtual printing driver to keep redirected destinations stable across RDP sessions. ThinPrint focuses on controlled remote print redirection with granular print rule configuration that maps printers across session types while managing the print path for consistent results.

Remote printer mapping stability, driver handling, and automation controls

Remote desktop printing software succeeds when redirected printers stay consistent across reconnections and session types without manual recreation of queues. In this category, stability depends on how each product persists mappings and how it routes print jobs through a virtual printer driver model.

  • Printer mapping persistence for reconnections

    ezeep, ScrewDrivers, and UniPrint Infinity focus on persistent redirected printer mapping so users keep the same session destinations after disconnects and reconnects. TSPrint and USB for Remote Desktop also target mapping persistence for session printer assignment, but TSPrint emphasizes client-to-session mapping management across apps.

  • Virtual printer driver behavior to reduce driver mismatch failures

    ezeep and ScrewDrivers use a virtual printer driver approach to limit driver mismatch failures that occur when remote endpoints use different driver packages. ThinPrint and Celiveo also center on virtual printer driver based redirection, while Parallels RAS integrates its virtual printer driver with RAS session printer handling.

  • Central provisioning and provisioning workflow control

    Printix provides central printer provisioning with persistent per-user session mappings to reduce redirected print support tickets. PrinterOn takes a workflow approach with centrally managed printer entries tied to a remote print release process for clearer job traceability.

  • Rule configuration granularity for session types and roles

    ThinPrint delivers granular print rule configuration for printer mapping across session types to keep mappings correct under mixed driver and queue strategies. UniPrint Infinity adds rule-based session routing for remote printer visibility control, while TSPrint focuses on configurable mapping behavior to support predictable session printer availability.

  • Admin governance depth and automation surface

    ezeep combines persistent mapping with a client component that improves driver compatibility for redirected print jobs. TSPrint is called out for limited automation and API surface for provisioning and reporting compared with IT-first suites, and Printix reporting and governance controls require workflow discipline in larger deployments.

Choose by mapping persistence model, driver strategy, and provisioning workflow

The primary fork is whether redirected printer stability comes from persistent mapping managed by the product or from endpoint naming consistency and rollout discipline. ezeep and ScrewDrivers emphasize persistence that survives reconnections, while endpoint naming consistency becomes a key dependency for ScrewDrivers and can also matter for other mapping rule designs.

  • Validate reconnection stability with the product’s mapping persistence design

    If session printer assignments must remain stable after reconnects, start with ezeep or ScrewDrivers because both explicitly focus on printer mapping persistence to reduce reconnection churn. If the environment needs visibility control with routing rules, UniPrint Infinity adds rule-based session routing to keep mapped redirected printing consistent across mixed client fleets.

  • Select the driver mismatch strategy based on your endpoint driver heterogeneity

    Choose ezeep, ScrewDrivers, or ThinPrint when endpoint and server driver mismatch is a recurring failure mode because their virtual printer driver handling targets driver mismatch mitigation. Choose Parallels RAS only when the deployment already runs RAS session publishing, because its printer presentation is integrated with RAS session printer handling.

  • Decide whether centralized provisioning or session routing rules will carry the admin load

    Choose Printix when centralized printer assignment reduces per-user troubleshooting and when per-user mappings must remain consistent across remote endpoints. Choose UniPrint Infinity or ThinPrint when rule-based session mapping and mapping across session roles requires careful coverage and tuning to match endpoint and host roles.

  • Assess governance requirements for operational reporting and automation

    If automated provisioning and reporting integration are necessary, prioritize ezeep because it includes a client component to improve driver compatibility for redirected print jobs. If the rollout plan depends on human-driven configuration and reporting review, TSPrint is flagged for limited automation and API surface for provisioning and reporting.

  • Pick the workflow model that matches your print release and traceability needs

    Choose PrinterOn when controlled print release workflow tied to centrally managed printer entries must provide clearer job traceability. Choose the other tools when the priority is printer mapping persistence and in-session destination control without adding a centralized release gate.

Teams that need consistent redirected printing across RDP and VDI sessions

IT teams and admins need remote desktop printing software when reconnections, mixed endpoint printer fleets, and driver mismatch failures create repeated help-desk incidents. The best fit depends on whether the environment can standardize printer naming or needs product-enforced persistence and driver normalization.

  • Enterprises standardizing redirected printing across heterogeneous endpoints

    ezeep and ThinPrint address driver mismatch risk through virtual printer driver behavior and mapping strategies that keep remote destinations consistent across mixed client hardware.

  • VDI and RDP deployments that see frequent reconnect churn

    ScrewDrivers and USB for Remote Desktop target session printer assignment persistence so reconnections do not force repeated mapping work.

  • Organizations running RAS published apps and needing in-app printer consistency

    Parallels RAS is aligned with RAS session publishing because its virtual printer driver is integrated with RAS session printer handling for consistent in-session printer availability.

  • Admins focused on centralized onboarding and fewer per-user tickets

    Printix provides central printer provisioning with persistent per-user session mappings to reduce per-user troubleshooting when redirected printing fails.

  • IT teams that require controlled remote print release and job tracking

    PrinterOn ties centrally managed printer entries to a remote release workflow so print submission is controlled and traceable across varied user devices and networks.

Common deployment mistakes with remote redirected printers and virtual drivers

Missteps usually come from assuming redirected printing works without aligning mappings, driver expectations, and governance workflows. Another failure pattern is treating printer mapping as a one-time setup even though reconnections, role changes, and driver rollouts can break assumptions.

  • Assuming reconnections will keep the same printer destinations without validating persistence behavior

    Run reconnection tests with ezeep and ScrewDrivers to confirm persistent printer mapping behaves as expected after sessions drop and reattach. Validate that mapping drift does not occur when endpoint printer naming differs from what the mapping expects.

  • Overlooking driver requirements for certain device classes when relying on a virtual printer driver model

    Treat ezeep’s dedicated virtual printing driver as a reducer of mismatch failures, not a guarantee for every device class. ThinPrint and Celiveo also require careful deployment planning when multiple driver and queue strategies must coexist.

  • Underestimating configuration complexity when using rule-based session routing or deep application-specific tuning

    UniPrint Infinity needs careful coverage for mapping rules across endpoint and host roles, and deep application-specific tuning can take time to standardize. ThinPrint also increases complexity when multiple driver and queue strategies must coexist.

  • Choosing a tool with limited automation or reporting integration and then scaling provisioning with manual steps

    TSPrint is flagged for limited automation and API surface for provisioning and reporting, which increases operational overhead in environments needing heavy automation. Printix reporting and governance controls require workflow discipline in larger deployments.

  • Mapping printers without aligning the release workflow to centralized printer entries

    PrinterOn requires careful printer mapping to physical device endpoints, because controlled release depends on that mapping being correct. If the mapping is incomplete, redirected printer behavior can vary based on client capability and environment.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated how each tool maintains redirected printer destinations across reconnections, with ezeep standing out for printer mapping persistence backed by a dedicated virtual printing driver and a client component that improves driver compatibility. We weighted feature coverage at 40% and prioritized capabilities like mapping persistence, virtual printer driver behavior, and granular session mapping control from tools such as ThinPrint and UniPrint Infinity.

We weighted ease and value at 30% each by focusing on the stated admin workload, configuration effort, and operational friction called out for each product. We also ranked based on whether provisioning, reporting, and automation surface matched the category’s needs, with TSPrint scoring lower on automation and API surface and Printix requiring governance workflow discipline in larger deployments.

Frequently Asked Questions About remote desktop printing software

How do ezeep and TSPrint differ in how redirected printers appear inside an RDP session?
ezeep installs a client component so sessions can show session printers without manual queue reinstall steps. TSPrint standardizes the client-to-session printer mapping behavior so redirected printers follow centrally managed policies across RDP apps.
Which tools in this list prioritize printer mapping persistence across reconnections?
ezeep and ScrewDrivers both target printer mapping persistence so reconnections keep stable redirected destinations. UniPrint Infinity also emphasizes printer mapping persistence with rule-based session routing so printer visibility stays consistent when sessions change.
How does ThinPrint handle driver mismatch risk compared with Celiveo?
ThinPrint focuses on print management that configures virtual printer behavior end to end so redirected printing follows a controlled path and reduces driver mismatch failures. Celiveo narrows scope to virtual printer driver based redirection with administratively controlled printer mapping, so it is more dependent on the configured virtual print pathway.
When a print spooler crash happens on a print server, which option is most likely to preserve redirected printing state?
USB for Remote Desktop targets stable redirected printers across RDP sessions by handling session printer assignment in a way that reduces rerun setup after reconnects. TSPrint and ThinPrint both reduce mapping churn through standardized virtual printer workflows, but they rely on the configured mapping persistence and print management components to recover gracefully.
What breaks if driver-based redirection is not standardized across endpoints for ScrewDrivers and Parallels RAS?
ScrewDrivers expects consistent virtual printer behavior so printer routing survives driver mismatches and frequent printer changes. Parallels RAS depends on the Parallels virtual printer driver compatibility, so incorrect client-session driver combinations can lead to missing or misrouted session printer devices inside published applications.
Which tools offer administration patterns that map printers by user group and session policy?
Printix uses centrally configured printer availability and per-user printer assignment so session printers follow group-based mappings. UniPrint Infinity and TSPrint both use policy-style printer mapping rules so redirected printer visibility is controlled without manual per-endpoint queue installs.
How do Printix and PrinterOn differ in the workflow used to control who can print to which physical device?
Printix provisions printers and assigns them to users so print jobs route through a Printix-managed flow tied to session mappings. PrinterOn uses a web-managed print discovery and print release workflow where job release is controlled by centrally managed printer entries and access policies.
What integration and API options exist for automating printer provisioning in Printix versus ezeep?
Printix supports admin-side automation around centrally managed printer provisioning and per-user mapping so IT can assign printers without endpoint-driven queue browsing. ezeep centers on configuration controls for printer availability and consistent redirection behavior across user groups, with integration workflows typically oriented around its client and mapping configuration rather than web-driven release flows.
Where does session printer mapping typically fail due to mismatched configuration in UniPrint Infinity and Celiveo?
UniPrint Infinity can fail to show expected redirected devices when rule-based session routing does not match the user and client mapping inputs used for printer visibility. Celiveo can fail when the virtual printer driver pathway is not allowed to manage the full RDS printing chain, because session printers follow the defined mapping rules rather than ad hoc client device behavior.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.