GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
AI In IndustryTop 10 Best Online Scrum Software of 2026
Top 10 online scrum software ranking for Jira, Confluence, and monday.com teams with strengths, tradeoffs, and reviews of Axosoft, ClickUp, Asana.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Axosoft is the best fit for development teams that want controlled Scrum execution synced with Jira-aligned work tracking, whereas Pivotal Tracker is the better alternative if you need fast story and sprint progress charts without building Jira-style workflows.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Axosoft
Configurable sprint workflow governance that ties role permissions to state transitions and reporting outcomes.
Built for fits when development teams need controlled scrum execution synced with Jira-aligned work tracking..
ClickUp
Editor pickCustom automation rules can update multiple task fields and statuses across projects from workflow events.
Built for fits when teams want scrum execution plus workflow automation inside one configurable workspace..
Asana
Editor pickProject timeline and dependency-style linking keep delivery work connected to sprint tasks for shared execution visibility.
Built for fits when teams want scrum execution plus cross-functional handoffs in one work system..
Comparison Table
Axosoft
SMBScrum project management software with release planning and bug tracking.
Configurable sprint workflow governance that ties role permissions to state transitions and reporting outcomes.
Axosoft targets teams that want scrum tracking without losing Jira alignment, since work item flows can map to epics and user stories while keeping acceptance criteria and definition discipline in place. The system provides sprint execution views for daily standup follow-ups and sprint review artifacts, with reporting that focuses on planned versus completed work across sprints. Automation can reduce manual status updates by syncing work state and pushing consistent fields into sprint planning boards.
A notable tradeoff is that deep governance and reporting accuracy depend on consistent setup of workflow rules and field usage, since sprint metrics reflect how work items are created and transitioned. Axosoft fits best when a development team needs repeatable scrum execution across multiple sprints and requires controlled change management rather than ad hoc board usage.
- +Strong governance with RBAC and controlled workflow configuration
- +Jira-friendly work item mapping for consistent backlog and sprint execution
- +Sprint progress reporting tied to work item states and goal tracking
- +Automation reduces manual updates across sprint lifecycle
- –Best reporting depends on disciplined workflow transitions and field usage
- –Advanced configuration can take time for multi-team rollout
- –Some reporting formats require careful alignment of sprint settings
- –Edge-case customization can rely on integration and automation patterns
Agile program managers
Track sprint health across multiple teams
Faster escalation of schedule risk
Scrum masters
Run repeatable sprint ceremonies at scale
Less manual meeting prep
Show 2 more scenarios
Product owners
Maintain backlog priorities tied to outcomes
Clearer readiness for sprint planning
Aligns backlog item states with acceptance criteria and sprint execution views.
Development team leads
Enforce consistent execution with WIP discipline
More predictable sprint completion
Uses controlled board and workflow transitions to reduce stalled work.
Best for: Fits when development teams need controlled scrum execution synced with Jira-aligned work tracking.
ClickUp
SMBProductivity platform offering dedicated sprint management and agile views.
Custom automation rules can update multiple task fields and statuses across projects from workflow events.
ClickUp is a strong fit for scrum teams that manage work beyond software delivery, because it lets a development team run iterations while also tracking dependencies in the same project space. Task objects can carry custom fields for acceptance criteria and done criteria, and sprint execution can be shown on task boards with WIP controls. Reporting includes velocity chart style tracking and burndown-style progress views, which helps product owner and scrum master roles monitor iteration health.
A clear tradeoff is that scrum rigor depends on configuration discipline, because ClickUp provides flexible status and workflow modeling instead of enforced scrum roles and ceremonies. Teams using multiple board types and custom fields usually need setup time to keep backlog refinement, sprint planning, and daily standup updates consistent. ClickUp fits best when a team wants one backlog and one automation layer that drives task changes across multiple views.
- +Custom views let a single backlog drive boards, sprint views, and reporting
- +Workflow automation updates statuses and fields from triggers
- +API and integrations support custom connectors and event-driven sync
- +WIP controls reduce overstretched in-progress queues
- –Scrum roles and ceremonies require configuration and ongoing governance
- –Custom fields and board setups can become hard to standardize across teams
- –Large setups increase time spent maintaining consistent status semantics
- –Some scrum-specific reports need careful mapping to point fields
Product and delivery teams
Unify backlog and sprint execution views
Fewer sync errors during planning
Agile coaching orgs
Standardize iteration workflows across squads
More repeatable delivery cadence
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations engineering teams
Track dependencies with sprint work
Improved flow through handoffs
Cross-functional tasks stay linked while automation updates assignees and due dates through sprint cycles.
Development toolchain owners
Sync task data to external systems
Lower manual triage effort
Integrations and API calls support moving issue events and status changes between tools.
Best for: Fits when teams want scrum execution plus workflow automation inside one configurable workspace.
Asana
SMBProject management software with timeline and board views for agile teams.
Project timeline and dependency-style linking keep delivery work connected to sprint tasks for shared execution visibility.
Asana handles scrum teams with project-based boards, recurring sprint rituals, and task templates that standardize how user stories and supporting tasks get created. Work can be structured using levels and custom fields so teams can filter by release, team, or readiness status while keeping sprint work navigable from the same project. Reporting and history are grounded in task activity and project progress so teams can trace execution without switching systems.
A tradeoff versus Jira is that sprint metrics like velocity tracking and burndown charting require more manual setup than purpose-built Jira sprint reporting. Asana fits teams that run scrum while also needing engineering, design, and operations work to remain in one place for handoffs and shared visibility.
- +Task-level activity history supports execution tracing across sprint work
- +Custom fields and filters make sprint status reporting practical without add-ons
- +Workload views help balance WIP across owners and teams
- +Recurring project updates streamline standup and refinement routines
- –Burndown and velocity style reporting needs process discipline and setup
- –Scrum planning artifacts map less directly than in Jira issue workflows
- –Some sprint ceremony outputs require exporting to visualize externally
- –Cross-team permissioning can be complex for large orgs with many projects
Product teams with mixed functions
Run sprint work with shared handoffs
Fewer coordination gaps during sprints
Engineering managers
Track workload across sprint owners
More predictable sprint capacity
Show 2 more scenarios
Program operations teams
Coordinate multiple scrum teams
Clearer program-level execution visibility
Centralizes recurring sprint status updates and links cross-team tasks into shared views.
Scrum masters
Standardize ceremonies and artifacts
More consistent sprint readiness
Applies templates and project routines so refinement and planning repeat with consistent task structure.
Best for: Fits when teams want scrum execution plus cross-functional handoffs in one work system.
Monday.com
SMBWork operating system with customizable boards for sprint planning and tracking.
Automation across board state changes ties sprint work, impediment logs, and status visibility to scrum ceremonies without manual updates.
Monday.com maps scrum workflows onto configurable boards, so sprint execution and tracking can live alongside planning and reporting. It uses a work-item structure with fields that teams can adapt for story metadata, acceptance criteria text, and done criteria signals.
Automation rules and workflow updates connect board changes to recurring scrum rituals like sprint planning and backlog refinement status check-ins. Its extensibility via integrations and API support helps teams sync sprint artifacts with Jira and other engineering systems.
- +Board-centric scrum tracking supports custom fields for story and acceptance details
- +Automation can trigger status updates during sprint planning and refinement workflows
- +Integrations and API support help sync backlog and sprint progress with engineering tools
- +Permissions and workspace controls support role separation for PO and scrum master duties
- –Native scrum reporting like burndown and velocity needs careful field mapping to board data
- –Cross-team rollups require deliberate conventions for statuses and linked items
- –WIP limit enforcement is not as prescriptive as dedicated Kanban-focused tooling
- –Workflow scale can create slower board interactions when many items and columns are used
Best for: Fits when teams want configurable boards for scrum tracking plus automation and API sync to Jira-adjacent tooling.
Scrumwise
SMBCloud-based tool for managing Scrum projects with backlogs and sprints.
Automation for Scrum status transitions tied to sprint execution so tracking updates stay consistent across the backlog and board.
Scrumwise manages Scrum delivery with sprint execution, backlog workflows, and reporting built around Scrum roles. The core loop connects sprint planning, sprint tracking, and sprint review artifacts in a single working board experience.
It supports definition of done and acceptance-criteria style fields on work items so teams can standardize readiness and completion signals. It also provides automation around status transitions and reporting views used for velocity and burndown-style progress checking.
- +Sprint workflow and reporting stay connected across planning through closeout.
- +Work-item fields support done and acceptance criteria to standardize outcomes.
- +Status-transition automation reduces manual upkeep during daily tracking.
- +Velocity and burndown reporting clarifies progress trends across sprints.
- –Complex portfolio workflows require careful configuration of backlog hierarchies.
- –Cross-team governance needs discipline because audit history granularity is limited.
Best for: Fits when teams want Scrum-centric tracking and reporting without building Jira custom workflows.
Pivotal Tracker
vertical specialistPivotal Tracker uses stories, iterations, velocity, priorities, and backlog views for agile software delivery.
Velocity and burndown analytics are driven directly by story estimates and sprint iteration changes.
Pivotal Tracker is an online scrum tool built around lightweight planning and collaboration around user stories, sprints, and outcome tracking. Teams use Velocity charts and burndown views to connect sprint commitments to delivery progress without running a heavyweight workflow.
Pivotal Tracker also supports integrations and a documented API for syncing issues, states, and iteration artifacts across engineering tools. Governance stays practical through project-level roles and structured iteration planning fields.
- +Velocity and burndown views update from story state changes
- +Iteration planning stays focused with a clear sprint structure
- +API supports programmatic story and iteration operations
- +Workflow stays lightweight compared with issue-tracker heavy setups
- –Admin controls are narrower than Jira-style governance models
- –Complex cross-team workflows need external tooling and scripts
- –Reporting depth is limited versus tools with extensive custom analytics
- –Scaling rollups across many projects can require extra automation
Best for: Fits when teams want fast sprint tracking and story workflow with strong progress charts.
Azure DevOps
enterpriseAzure DevOps combines Azure Boards with repositories, pipelines, test management, and delivery planning.
Integration of Azure Boards work items with pipeline triggers and deployment artifacts for traceable delivery across sprints.
Azure DevOps connects work tracking to Git repositories and CI pipelines through a shared project model. Scrum execution stays visible with configurable work items, sprint boards, and analytics for capacity and delivery trends.
Automation is built around Azure Boards rules, service integrations, and REST APIs that support custom workflows and reporting. Governance options include project-level controls, audit trails, and permissioning that apply to work items, pipelines, and artifacts.
- +Work items map directly to Git commits and pipeline builds
- +Boards and queries support sprint planning artifacts with auditability
- +REST APIs enable custom automation for scrum events and reporting
- +Branch, build, and release governance integrates with RBAC
- –Scrum workflows need configuration to match specific team ceremonies
- –Cross-team reporting can require careful tagging and query design
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need scrum tracking tied to code and CI with API-driven customization.
OpenProject
enterpriseOpenProject provides open-source project management with agile boards, backlogs, sprints, and product roadmaps.
Built-in work-tracking model that combines Scrum planning with project governance and API-accessible workflow state.
OpenProject delivers an online Scrum workflow with strong planning and execution controls across projects, sprints, and backlogs. Teams can run sprint planning and track progress with boards, burndown-style reporting, and velocity measurement built into the work-tracking model.
Role-based project access, audit trails, and structured governance support multi-role collaboration between product owners, scrum masters, and delivery teams. Automation and an extensible integration surface help connect OpenProject workflows to external systems without rebuilding the Scrum process.
- +Sprint planning and tracking follow a consistent work-item workflow
- +Burndown and velocity reporting supports backlog-to-sprint progress checks
- +Role-based access and project governance reduce cross-team permission risks
- +Integrations work through an API and configurable workflow hooks
- –Scrum views can require configuration to match each team’s process
- –Advanced reporting beyond core charts may need external data exports
Best for: Fits when teams need structured Scrum execution with governance controls and an integration-friendly API.
Shortcut
SMBShortcut organizes product backlogs, stories, iterations, epics, roadmaps, and engineering workflows.
Shortcut’s sprint planning and execution views keep sprint goals and backlogs linked to progress reporting in one work-item graph.
Shortcut captures Scrum boards in a work-item model that links epics, stories, and sprint plans to release-level outcomes. Sprint execution is supported through planning to completion views like boards, burndown style progress, and velocity tracking without forcing Jira-native configuration.
Calendar-based and roadmap-style views connect to your sprint backlog so teams can reconcile sprint goal scope with delivery expectations. Automation is built around recurring workflows and board state transitions, with an API surface for syncing issues to external systems.
- +Work items map cleanly from backlog items to sprint execution
- +Burndown-style progress views track sprint completion trends
- +Velocity tracking helps compare planned work versus delivery history
- +API supports syncing work items and sprint structure to external tools
- –Jira-centric teams may need process translation to match Shortcut workflows
- –Automation rules cover common state changes but stay limited for advanced multi-step logic
- –Reporting depth lags Jira add-on ecosystems for highly customized analytics
- –Cross-team governance controls feel lighter than enterprise Jira setups
Best for: Fits when teams want Scrum execution and reporting tied to sprints, without running Jira workflows for every step.
Rally
enterpriseRally provides portfolio planning, program backlogs, iterations, dependencies, and scaled agile reporting.
Work item linking across epics, stories, and sprints creates end-to-end traceability through sprint execution views.
Rally is an online scrum planning tool built around portfolio traceability from epics down to user stories and sprint execution. It supports structured workflows for backlog grooming, sprint planning, and progress reporting with tools like velocity tracking and burndown charts.
Rally also emphasizes configuration of work item fields and status lifecycles so teams can align definition of done with their delivery process. For organizations comparing Jira Software, Confluence, and monday.com, Rally’s main differentiator is end-to-end work tracking across levels rather than documentation-first collaboration.
- +Trace work from epics to sprint backlog with consistent identifiers
- +Configurable work item fields and state lifecycles match scrum status flows
- +Velocity tracking and burndown reporting are built for sprint progress visibility
- +Automation rules can update fields and statuses as workflow conditions change
- –Workflow configuration can require careful governance to avoid inconsistent statuses
- –Daily standup is not as feature-dense as sprint execution and reporting
- –Cross-team planning dashboards take configuration effort before they feel tailored
- –Advanced reporting often depends on disciplined field usage across teams
Best for: Fits when teams need sprint execution tied to higher-level epics with controlled workflow configuration.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 ai in industry, Axosoft stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right online scrum software
This buyer's guide covers online scrum software options used to run sprint planning, backlog refinement, and sprint execution across distributed teams, including Axosoft, ClickUp, Asana, monday.com, and Scrumwise. It also evaluates Pivotal Tracker, Azure DevOps, OpenProject, Shortcut, and Rally to show how each tool handles governance, automation, and cross-tool integration when teams already run Jira-aligned work tracking.
The narrative sections that follow focus on how each platform maps sprint artifacts to work items and how automation updates status across the workflow. Axosoft ranks highest for configurable sprint workflow governance that ties role permissions to state transitions and reporting outcomes.
Online Scrum software for sprint execution, workflow control, and ceremony tracking
Online scrum software centralizes sprint planning artifacts, sprint execution updates, and progress reporting inside a web interface built around backlog items that move through defined workflow states. Tools like Axosoft emphasize permission-aware workflow configuration so Scrum roles can be tied to state transitions and reporting outcomes rather than relying only on manual status updates.
Other platforms such as monday.com use board-centric configuration with automation that ties sprint work, impediment logs, and status visibility to ceremonies. Across the market, the key differences show up in workflow governance depth, how automation writes back to work item fields, and how easily integrations sync scrum artifacts to Jira-adjacent tooling.
Workflow governance, automation, and Jira-adjacent integration controls
Online scrum software succeeds when sprint state changes and ceremony outputs land in the right work item fields without manual copying. The strongest platforms connect role permissions, workflow transitions, and reporting so sprint execution remains consistent across teams.
In Jira-aligned environments, the deciding factor becomes how automation and API actions write status, links, and derived metrics back into the work model. The tools in this guide separate themselves by the depth of governance configuration, the scope of automation triggers, and how directly scrum execution maps to backlog items.
Role-aware workflow governance tied to reporting outcomes
Axosoft configures sprint workflow governance that connects RBAC and controlled workflow configuration to reporting outcomes. This reduces reliance on disciplined manual status updates compared with tools that leave ceremony updates to user behavior.
Automation rules that update multiple fields from workflow events
ClickUp uses custom automation rules to update multiple task fields and statuses across projects from workflow events. monday.com similarly uses automation across board state changes, but it is board-centric and depends on consistent field mapping.
Backlog-to-sprint visibility using board or task-native reporting views
Asana links execution work to sprint tasks through project timeline and dependency-style linking so handoffs remain visible. Shortcut keeps sprint goals and backlog links in one work item graph so burndown-style progress views stay tied to sprint execution.
Sprint analytics driven from story estimates and sprint iteration changes
Pivotal Tracker drives velocity and burndown analytics directly from story estimates and sprint iteration changes. OpenProject supports backlog-to-sprint progress checks with sprint planning and core chart reporting tied to its structured work-item workflow.
Iteration-ready work item linking for end-to-end traceability
Rally links work across epics, stories, and sprints to maintain end-to-end traceability through sprint execution views. This contrasts with Scrumwise, which keeps scrum status transitions connected to sprint execution so tracking updates remain consistent across backlog and board.
Work item and delivery traceability through code and pipeline artifacts
Azure DevOps integrates Azure Boards work items with pipeline triggers and deployment artifacts for traceable delivery across sprints. Axosoft focuses on governance-first scrum execution, while Azure DevOps adds delivery-to-work mapping that supports engineering workflows.
Pick based on workflow control depth, automation scope, and integration behavior
Start with workflow control depth because it determines whether scrum roles can move items through states without manual coordination. Then assess automation scope because it determines whether status, impediment visibility, and derived progress metrics update during planning and refinement.
For Jira-aligned teams, the next filter is integration behavior with Jira-adjacent work tracking. Some platforms map directly into Jira-style work item lifecycles, while others require process translation before they produce accurate sprint reporting.
Select governance-first if state transitions must be permission controlled
Choose Axosoft when controlled workflow configuration must tie role permissions to state transitions and reporting outcomes for consistent scrum execution. This approach is a closer fit than tools that rely more on governance discipline through configuration plus user behavior.
Select automation-first if ceremonies should write back to fields automatically
Choose ClickUp when automation rules must update multiple task fields and statuses from workflow events across projects. Choose monday.com when board state changes must update sprint work, impediment logs, and status visibility through automation, with careful field mapping.
Choose sprint-analytics-first if progress charts must update from story state changes
Choose Pivotal Tracker when velocity and burndown analytics should be driven directly by story estimates and sprint iteration changes. Choose OpenProject when sprint planning and tracking follow a consistent work-item workflow with core charts that support backlog-to-sprint progress checks.
Choose Jira-adjacent workflow mapping when backlog states must translate cleanly
Choose Axosoft for Jira-friendly work item mapping so backlog and sprint execution remain consistent when Jira-aligned work tracking is already in place. Choose Rally when end-to-end linking across epics, stories, and sprints is required with controlled workflow configuration.
Choose delivery-traceability when work items must connect to pipeline outcomes
Choose Azure DevOps when scrum tracking needs traceability from work items to Git commits and pipeline builds with auditability. This is a better match than tools focused on sprint execution charts when code and CI artifacts are part of the delivery definition.
Choose scrum-centric tracking when the team avoids building Jira-like workflows
Choose Scrumwise when sprint workflow and reporting must stay connected across planning through closeout without building Jira custom workflows. Choose Shortcut when sprint goals and backlog links must stay connected inside sprint execution views even if Jira-centric teams need process translation.
Who benefits from these online scrum software strengths
Teams that run scrum ceremonies across distributed members benefit when scrum status updates are tied to workflow state changes and automation. Organizations with Jira-aligned work tracking also benefit when sprint artifacts can sync to Jira-adjacent tooling without losing meaning.
The tools in this guide fit different operating models. Some tools center governance and field control, while others center analytics, board automation, or delivery traceability.
Scrum teams that need permission-controlled state transitions to prevent inconsistent execution
Axosoft fits teams that require RBAC and controlled workflow configuration so state transitions drive reporting outcomes without manual ceremony reconciliation.
Product and delivery teams that want scrum execution plus cross-project workflow automation
ClickUp fits teams that need custom automation rules to update multiple task fields and statuses from workflow events across projects to keep sprint artifacts current.
Engineering orgs that require work item traceability to code and pipeline artifacts
Azure DevOps fits teams that need Azure Boards work items to map directly to Git commits and pipeline builds so sprint execution connects to CI and deployment.
Teams that prioritize fast sprint tracking with progress charts tied to story estimates
Pivotal Tracker fits teams that want velocity and burndown views to update directly from story state changes and sprint iteration updates.
Teams scaling from single-team scrum to portfolio-style epic-to-sprint traceability
Rally fits teams that need work item linking across epics, stories, and sprints so end-to-end traceability remains consistent through sprint execution views.
Common mistakes when evaluating online scrum software
Many teams choose based on sprint dashboards and then discover the workflow model does not match how their organization runs ceremonies. The result is inaccurate burndown or velocity because field mapping or workflow transitions were never standardized.
Another common error is treating automation as a substitute for governance. Automation can update statuses and fields only when the team uses consistent states and disciplined transition paths.
Configuring a workflow without agreeing on how fields map from scrum states to board or work item fields
monday.com requires deliberate conventions for statuses and linked items because native burndown and velocity reporting depends on careful field mapping to board data.
Assuming sprint reporting will work without workflow transition discipline
Axosoft reports depend on disciplined workflow transitions and field usage because advanced reporting quality improves when state transitions follow the configured workflow.
Overbuilding custom fields and views without a standardization plan
ClickUp can become hard to standardize across teams when custom fields and board setups grow, so teams should plan conventions before scaling automation.
Using cross-team portfolio workflows without a governance plan for statuses and identifiers
Rally workflow configuration can require careful governance to avoid inconsistent statuses, while Sprint execution views depend on consistent identifiers across epics and stories.
Expecting core sprint charts to cover complex reporting without exports or external analysis
OpenProject supports core charts for backlog-to-sprint progress checks, but advanced reporting beyond core charts may require external data exports.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Axosoft, ClickUp, Asana, Monday.com, Scrumwise, Pivotal Tracker, Azure DevOps, OpenProject, Shortcut, and Rally on workflow governance depth, automation reach, and how reliably sprint state changes map to reporting outcomes. Features counted for 40% of the score, and ease and value each counted for 30% based on how configuration effort affects day-to-day sprint execution.
Axosoft ranked highest because configurable sprint workflow governance ties RBAC and controlled workflow configuration to reporting outcomes, which reduces inconsistent execution compared with tools that prioritize board automation or analytics over permission-aware state transitions. The scoring also reflected that several platforms add strong automation or charting, but they either depend more on disciplined configuration or require process translation for Jira-aligned teams.
Frequently Asked Questions About online scrum software
How do online scrum tools handle Jira-aligned workflows for sprint execution?
Which tools support SSO and role-based access controls for scrum roles like product owner and scrum master?
How does data migration work when moving sprint backlogs and sprint histories from Jira or spreadsheets?
What breaks if sprint state transitions are not governed with audit trails?
When do automation rules stop helping and start creating conflicting updates across boards and tasks?
Which tools best support API-driven integrations with engineering systems like CI pipelines or issue trackers?
How do tools model acceptance criteria and definition of done across backlog refinement and execution?
Where does each tool place velocity and burndown reporting in the workflow?
What tradeoff appears when a tool focuses on Scrum-centric views versus a general work management model?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
AI In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of ai in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare ai in industry tools→