GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Online Reporting Software of 2026
Top 10 online reporting software ranked by dashboards, reporting, and sharing needs, with notes for teams using tools like Power BI and Tableau.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Bold Reports is the best pick if you need embedded, scheduled reporting with pixel-perfect parameter templates for enterprise apps, whereas Zoho Analytics fits teams that want governed self-service reporting and shareable dashboard patterns without heavy custom development.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Bold Reports
Embedded reporting with REST-driven report runs supports embedding and automated exports from the same report artifacts.
Built for fits when teams need embedded, scheduled, pixel-perfect reporting with parameter-driven templates..
Zoho Analytics
Editor pickInteractive drill-down report pages with parameterized controls inside the same workbook experience.
Built for fits when reporting workflows need scheduled delivery, parameterized templates, and governed sharing..
Telerik Reporting
Editor pickReport rendering runs on the server with an embedded .NET report viewer and export pipeline for controlled output generation.
Built for fits when .NET teams need embedded, server-scheduled reporting with controlled outputs and templates..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Bold Reports
enterpriseBold Reports offers a reporting platform for embedding analytics into enterprise software.
Embedded reporting with REST-driven report runs supports embedding and automated exports from the same report artifacts.
Bold Reports targets teams that need consistent layouts across emails and files, with controlled pagination and styling that carry through to PDF and office exports. The designer supports crosstabs and pivot-style analysis output, then applies conditional formatting and drill-down to reduce manual analysis steps. Parameterized reports enable filter prompt experiences for both embedded viewing and scheduled runs.
A tradeoff appears when governance requirements demand deep, org-wide auditing or granular approval workflows, since Bold Reports concentrates most controls in report and user access rather than enterprise workflow orchestration. A common fit is operations and finance teams that need recurring report bursting and export delivery for stakeholders without rebuilding report layouts each cycle.
- +Pixel-precise report layouts carry into PDF and office exports
- +Embedded reporting supports interactive report viewing inside apps
- +Parameterized reports enable reusable templates with runtime filters
- +REST API enables automated report generation and distribution
- –Governance depth for complex approvals is limited compared with workflow suites
- –Advanced layouts require design-time tuning to match complex data edges
- –High-volume burst schedules can require careful planning for execution windows
- –Direct database feature parity depends on the connected data provider
Revenue operations teams
Monthly forecast report delivery automation
Fewer manual report runs
Product analytics engineers
In-app customer activity reporting
Self-serve views in product
Show 2 more scenarios
Finance reporting analysts
Variance report with crosstab layouts
Faster variance analysis
Use crosstabs with conditional formatting and drill-down for explainable monthly variance.
Operations managers
Report bursting to department folders
Consistent distribution across teams
Run a single template with filters and burst outputs to different recipients each cycle.
Best for: Fits when teams need embedded, scheduled, pixel-perfect reporting with parameter-driven templates.
More related reading
Zoho Analytics
SMBZoho Analytics enables self-service reporting and visual data discovery.
Interactive drill-down report pages with parameterized controls inside the same workbook experience.
Zoho Analytics is a strong fit for organizations that run recurring reports and want consistent definitions across departments. Scheduled report delivery works alongside data refresh interval settings, so dashboards and emailed reports can stay synchronized. Parameterized reports and drill-down report behavior help support ad hoc report requests without rebuilding logic for every question.
A key tradeoff is that advanced governance and performance tuning often require deliberate configuration of data import design, refresh frequency, and workbook structure. Zoho Analytics works best when teams standardize datasets and templates, then let users fill report parameters and drill into the same managed views.
- +Scheduled report delivery supports recurring email distributions
- +Parameterized reports reduce rebuilds for common report variants
- +Drill-down interactions speed investigation from dashboards
- +CSV export and XLSX export support spreadsheet-based review workflows
- –Large datasets need careful refresh and model design for stable throughput
- –Cross-team governance requires disciplined workspace and role assignment
RevOps reporting teams
Weekly pipeline and forecast reporting
Fewer manual report copies
Finance operations teams
Monthly management packs with exports
Consistent pack distribution
Show 2 more scenarios
Customer analytics teams
Ad hoc cohort and drill-down analysis
Faster root-cause analysis
Users explore interactive dashboards and drill into metrics without rebuilding report logic.
BI admins and analysts
Governed self-service reporting
Controlled workbook sprawl
Admins manage access to workspaces and refresh jobs while users run parameter prompts.
Best for: Fits when reporting workflows need scheduled delivery, parameterized templates, and governed sharing.
Telerik Reporting
developerTelerik Reporting enables .NET developers to embed interactive reports in applications.
Report rendering runs on the server with an embedded .NET report viewer and export pipeline for controlled output generation.
Telerik Reporting provides a report designer for building templates that render consistently across standard output targets like PDF and XLSX. Parameterized reports support runtime inputs that drive conditional formatting, data filtering, and drill-down report navigation paths. Scheduled delivery and bursting-style routing help operations teams distribute recurring documents without manual steps.
The main tradeoff is tighter coupling to its .NET-centric hosting model than alternatives that lead with cross-platform self-service. Teams that already standardize on a .NET application layer can embed report rendering, control execution, and manage throughput predictably. Teams needing heavy semantic-layer governance or broad cloud-native data ingestion workflows often spend time building connectors and deployment wiring.
- +Pixel-precise rendering for consistent report layout in exports
- +Server-side scheduling for recurring PDF and spreadsheet generation
- +Parameter-driven reports support runtime filters and routing
- +Embed report rendering directly into .NET applications
- –More setup effort than pure web reporting tools
- –Cross-platform hosting options are narrower than cloud-first products
- –Complex bursting rules need careful template design
- –Customization for non-.NET stacks can add integration work
Operations teams
Distribute recurring compliance PDFs
Fewer manual document handoffs
Finance teams
Generate parameterized month-end workbooks
Faster month-end analysis distribution
Show 2 more scenarios
Product analytics teams
Drill-down into metric rows
Quicker issue investigation
Build interactive drill-down report flows that guide users from summaries to details.
Enterprise developers
Embed reporting inside apps
Consistent reporting in workflows
Call the reporting engine from application code for on-demand rendering and exports.
Best for: Fits when .NET teams need embedded, server-scheduled reporting with controlled outputs and templates.
Tableau
enterpriseTableau provides visual analytics and interactive reporting capabilities for enterprise data.
Tableau’s calculation and visualization engine powers complex interactive behaviors inside a single workbook.
Tableau turns analytics into shareable, interactive reporting through dashboards, interactive filters, and strong export controls. It connects to many data sources and supports live and extracted workflows, with refresh schedules for extracted data.
Tableau publishing supports governed sharing to teams, plus embedded analytics when deployed with Tableau Server or Tableau Cloud. Admin tooling centers on projects, user roles, and content permissions that affect who can view and edit reports.
- +Interactive dashboards support rich drill-down across complex crosstabs
- +Strong parameterized reports with filter-driven views and drill behavior
- +Export controls cover common PDF and spreadsheet report output needs
- +Governed sharing uses projects and permission sets for content access
- –Advanced workbook performance tuning often needs expertise with extracts and caching
- –Cross-team content reuse can become complex without disciplined workbook templates
- –Data model consistency across datasets requires ongoing governance work
- –Automated reporting workflows depend on server scheduling features and job setup
Best for: Fits when teams need interactive reporting with controlled publishing and repeatable dashboard patterns.
Microsoft Power BI
enterpriseMicrosoft Power BI delivers cloud-based business intelligence and reporting services.
Power BI semantic model lets multiple reports share curated measures while enforcing row-level security rules per user.
Microsoft Power BI publishes interactive dashboards and governs them through a tenant-wide service model. Its core capabilities include report authoring with visuals, a semantic model for consistent metrics, and scheduled refresh for keeping visuals current.
Organizations can distribute content through apps and workspace permissions, then refine views with drill-down, filters, and row-level security. Export workflows support common formats like PDF and Excel for dashboard and report consumers.
- +Semantic model consistency reduces metric drift across many reports
- +Scheduled refresh supports recurring dataset updates without manual steps
- +Workspace apps and permissions provide controlled distribution for groups
- +Export to PDF and Excel supports common business distribution needs
- –Large models can slow authoring and dashboard performance without tuning
- –Row-level security design takes careful role and filter mapping work
- –Some advanced report behaviors require specific setup to match expectations
- –Cross-tenant governance adds friction when distributing content broadly
Best for: Fits when teams need enterprise-managed dashboards with consistent metrics and scheduled data refresh.
Looker Studio
SMBGoogle Looker Studio creates customizable dashboards and reports from connected data sources.
In-report parameter controls create interactive drill paths without creating separate report copies.
Looker Studio is an online reporting and dashboard builder built around browser-based report design and shared viewing. It supports parameterized reports with interactive controls, then publishes results via share links and embedded reports in other web properties.
Connections to major data sources enable recurring refresh behavior that keeps dashboards aligned with changing datasets. Built-in export options cover PDF and common office formats for distributing snapshots of curated views.
- +Parameter controls let users drive filters without editing the report
- +Works well for embedded reporting with consistent dashboard styling
- +Exported PDFs preserve curated layouts for stakeholder reviews
- +Broad connector set supports direct reporting from common data stores
- –Cross-team governance needs careful link and ownership management
- –Advanced modeling patterns can require work outside the report layer
- –High-volume refresh can lag behind operational data update needs
- –Fine-grained permissions by data fields are limited compared with BI suites
Best for: Fits when teams need browser-built dashboards, parameter controls, and shareable exports for recurring reporting.
Domo
enterpriseDomo provides a cloud-native platform combining data integration and reporting.
Domo’s embedded analytics and automation tooling lets reports and KPI visualizations trigger inside external app experiences via API and webhooks.
Domo ties reporting and dashboarding to an integration-first data and workflow layer, so reports can be driven by connected sources and scheduled refresh. Dashboard sharing supports governed distribution through roles and workspace controls, with export options like CSV and PDF for downstream use.
Domo also provides automation via scheduled data refresh and recurring report delivery, which reduces manual reporting cycles. API and webhook extensibility supports embedding and operationalizing reports in internal tools.
- +Integration-driven dashboards reduce manual ETL handoffs
- +Scheduled report delivery supports recurring email-style distribution
- +API and webhooks help embed reporting into internal apps
- +Role-based access and workspace boundaries support governance
- –Governed distribution setup takes more configuration than ad hoc sharing
- –Pixel-perfect report layout options can be limiting versus dedicated report writers
- –Advanced modeling often depends on how sources are connected and staged
- –High refresh schedules can increase operational overhead for admins
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need integrated dashboards plus automation and embed-ready reporting workflows.
Stimulsoft
SMBStimulsoft offers reporting tools for web and desktop application development.
Embedded report rendering built around tight app control, including consistent template layout for exports and print-like output.
Stimulsoft is a reporting tool focused on embedded reporting and pixel-oriented report rendering for app-integrated use cases. It supports report design with parameterized templates, then drives production through web or app hosting and recurring report generation workflows.
Export output covers common office and document targets like PDF, XLSX, and CSV, and layout controls target consistent formatting across renders. Integration depth is strongest when reports must be rendered under application control rather than only authored for interactive viewing.
- +Embedded reporting design supports report rendering inside custom applications
- +Report templates handle parameter input for controlled output per request
- +Export set covers PDF and spreadsheet formats for downstream workflows
- +Layout engine targets consistent printed and exported formatting
- –Interactive analytics and self-service dashboard workflows are less central than report authoring
- –Advanced automation can require application-side orchestration
- –Report builder setup can take time for teams used to dashboard-first tools
- –Large report throughput depends heavily on hosting configuration
Best for: Fits when teams need report templates embedded in software and exported on schedule for business documents.
JasperReports
open sourceJasperReports provides open-source reporting for Java applications.
Report bursting with server-side scheduling and email distribution turns one template into many deliverables.
JasperReports generates pixel-oriented reports from parameterized templates using the JasperReports Server stack. It supports report bursting patterns for producing many output files from a single design, with scheduled delivery and email distribution options.
JasperReports also focuses on export workflows like PDF, XLSX, and CSV, which suits batch publishing and downstream systems. The reporting runtime is designed for integration with Java application environments and data sources through a server-managed report catalog.
- +Report templates deliver pixel-consistent layouts across repeated runs
- +Report bursting supports many outputs generated from one report definition
- +Scheduled delivery and email distribution fit automated reporting workflows
- +Built-in exports include PDF, XLSX, and CSV for downstream consumption
- –Admin setup takes more configuration work than common SaaS reporting dashboards
- –Complex layouts and crosstabs can increase template development effort
- –Interactive self-service analysis is limited compared with BI dashboard-first tools
- –Advanced automation often requires writing custom logic around parameters
Best for: Fits when Java-centric teams need templated, scheduled, and burst outputs with strict layout control.
IBM Cognos Analytics
enterpriseIBM Cognos Analytics provides AI-driven reporting and business intelligence tools.
Built-in report scheduling with report bursting behavior supports recurring multi-output delivery from managed templates.
IBM Cognos Analytics targets enterprise reporting teams that need managed report governance plus interactive analysis in a single workflow. It provides authoring for parameterized reports, crosstabs, and dashboards with scheduled delivery for PDF and Office exports.
Strong integration and automation support comes through its REST-based services and extensibility points for controlled publishing. Governance controls like RBAC and content-level permissions help teams keep shared reporting assets consistent across business units.
- +Granular permissions and RBAC support for controlled report sharing
- +Report authoring covers parameterized layouts, crosstabs, and dashboards
- +Scheduled delivery enables recurring PDF and Office export runs
- +REST services support automation of reporting and administration tasks
- –Advanced configuration requires governance discipline to avoid role sprawl
- –Custom interactions and bespoke visuals depend on supported extensibility paths
- –Performance tuning can be necessary for large, frequently refreshed datasets
- –Report authoring UX can feel heavier than pure self-service BI tools
Best for: Fits when enterprises need governed reporting assets plus scheduled exports alongside interactive analysis.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 data science analytics, Bold Reports stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right online reporting software
Online reporting software covers embedded and browser-based report viewing, parameter-driven report runs, and scheduled delivery of consistent outputs like PDF and spreadsheets.
This buyer guide covers Bold Reports, Zoho Analytics, Telerik Reporting, Tableau, Power BI, Looker Studio, Domo, Stimulsoft, JasperReports, and IBM Cognos Analytics, with attention to how each tool handles automation, embedding, and governed sharing across teams.
Online reporting software for embedded delivery, scheduled exports, and governed sharing
Online reporting software generates report artifacts from templates and interactive views, then publishes them through web access, exports, and scheduled email-style distributions.
Tools such as Bold Reports use REST-driven report runs to support embedding and automated exports from the same report artifacts. Zoho Analytics uses parameterized templates and scheduled report delivery to distribute recurring email outputs while keeping common report variants driven by controls inside the workbook.
Online reporting feature set that determines embedding, scheduling, and governed publishing
Online reporting succeeds when the report artifact can run the same template on demand or on schedule and then publish outputs in repeatable formats like PDF and spreadsheets. The differentiator across Bold Reports, Telerik Reporting, JasperReports, and IBM Cognos Analytics is how much automation control sits next to the report definition, especially when multiple outputs and approvals must stay consistent.
REST-driven report runs for embedded execution
Bold Reports supports embedding by running reports through REST-driven report runs that produce the same export artifacts used for automated output delivery. Stimulsoft also supports embedded rendering with tight app control, but Bold Reports is anchored in REST-driven execution that keeps export generation aligned with the embed workflow.
Server-side scheduling that generates recurring exports
Telerik Reporting runs report rendering on the server with server-side scheduling for recurring PDF and spreadsheet generation. JasperReports and IBM Cognos Analytics both support report bursting behavior with server-side scheduling, which turns one template into many scheduled deliverables.
Parameterized templates that reduce rebuilds
Zoho Analytics uses parameterized templates and scheduled report delivery so common report variants can be driven by parameter controls. Looker Studio and Tableau also support parameter-driven interaction, but Zoho Analytics emphasizes template reuse inside the same workbook experience.
Pixel-precise layout carryover into exports
Bold Reports and Telerik Reporting both focus on pixel-precise report layouts that carry into PDF and office exports. JasperReports and Stimulsoft also stress consistent template output, but Bold Reports and Telerik Reporting pair that consistency with embedded or server-controlled viewing paths.
Governed sharing for multi-team publishing
IBM Cognos Analytics provides granular permissions and RBAC for controlled report sharing, which fits enterprise governance needs. Zoho Analytics supports governed sharing through workspace discipline and role assignment, while Bold Reports limits governance depth for complex approvals compared with workflow suites.
Semantic model consistency and row-level security
Power BI’s semantic model lets multiple reports share curated measures and enforces row-level security per user. Tableau and Looker Studio provide interactive reporting and filtering, but Power BI is the only one here that explicitly centers metric consistency and per-user security through a shared semantic model.
Choose based on execution model, output automation, and governance control depth
The first fork should separate embedded report execution from browser-first dashboard authoring because it changes how reports get run, exported, and updated. The second fork should separate template-based report bursting and server scheduling from semantic-model-driven interactive analytics because those approaches lead to different performance tuning and governance workflows.
Pick embedded execution control or browser-first authoring
If reports must run from an app backend and return consistent export artifacts, Bold Reports uses REST-driven report runs for embedded execution and automated exports. If teams primarily author in-browser dashboards with interactive parameter controls, Looker Studio uses in-report parameter controls to drive drill paths without creating separate report copies.
Decide whether scheduling must drive exports from templates or from interactive datasets
If recurring delivery must be produced from managed report templates, Telerik Reporting schedules server-side rendering for recurring PDF and spreadsheet generation. If delivery must be burst into many outputs from one definition, JasperReports and IBM Cognos Analytics provide report bursting with scheduled delivery behavior.
Select a governance approach for multi-team publishing
If multi-team publishing requires granular RBAC and permission boundaries, IBM Cognos Analytics is built around granular permissions for controlled sharing. If governance depends more on workspace discipline, Zoho Analytics requires disciplined workspace and role assignment to keep cross-team sharing stable.
Choose between semantic-model metric governance or workbook-level controls
If metric consistency and row-level security must be enforced across many reports, Microsoft Power BI centers semantic model consistency and row-level security rules per user. If parameterized control is mainly about interactive drill-down pages and filter-driven views inside one workbook experience, Zoho Analytics and Tableau both emphasize parameter controls and drill behavior.
Check layout control needs against export fidelity and template effort
If pixel-perfect layouts must stay consistent across repeated runs, Bold Reports and Telerik Reporting emphasize pixel-precise rendering that carries into exports. If complex layouts and crosstabs increase template development effort, JasperReports and Bold Reports both benefit from design-time tuning, but JasperReports calls out more admin setup complexity for the same level of repeatable layouts.
Validate performance tuning and refresh workload assumptions
If authoring performance depends on extracts and caching work, Tableau notes advanced workbook performance tuning often needs expertise with extracts and caching. If refresh stability depends on model design and dataset size, Zoho Analytics flags that large datasets need careful refresh and model design for stable throughput.
Who benefits from this category of online reporting software
Teams need this category when the reporting workflow must produce repeatable artifacts for delivery and decision-making, not just ad hoc visualization. The strongest fit depends on whether the team needs embedded report execution, scheduled export automation, or enterprise governance for shared report assets.
Product and engineering teams embedding reporting inside internal or customer apps
Bold Reports uses REST-driven report runs for embedded execution and automated exports from the same report artifacts. Stimulsoft also supports embedded reporting with tight app control and template-based exports for print-like output.
Analytics teams that standardize metrics across many dashboards
Microsoft Power BI provides a semantic model that lets multiple reports share curated measures and enforce row-level security rules per user. Tableau can deliver rich interactive behaviors inside a workbook, but it does not explicitly centralize governance through a shared semantic model in the same way.
Operations and finance teams running recurring report delivery with consistent layouts
Telerik Reporting offers server-side scheduling for recurring PDF and spreadsheet generation with controlled templates. Zoho Analytics also supports scheduled report delivery through parameterized templates for recurring email-style distributions.
Enterprise teams that need governed sharing across many teams and roles
IBM Cognos Analytics provides granular permissions and RBAC for controlled report sharing with governed reporting assets. Zoho Analytics can support governed sharing, but cross-team governance depends on disciplined workspace and role assignment.
Java-centric teams generating many output variants from one definition
JasperReports supports report bursting with server-side scheduling and email distribution so one template can become many deliverables. Bold Reports supports embedded reporting with automated exports, but JasperReports is more directly positioned around bursting from a templated report definition.
Common pitfalls when selecting online reporting software
Misalignment usually happens when teams choose based on interactive dashboards but later need scheduled or embedded execution guarantees for the same report artifacts. Another failure pattern is skipping governance planning and then discovering role boundaries or approval steps do not map cleanly to the selected tool.
Choosing an interactive dashboard tool and then treating it like a template-driven export engine
Tableau and Looker Studio deliver interactive experiences, but Tableau notes workbook performance tuning can require extract and caching expertise. Telerik Reporting or JasperReports is a better fit when server-side scheduling and repeatable export pipelines are the delivery backbone.
Assuming complex approval workflows will map without process design
Bold Reports flags limited governance depth for complex approvals compared with workflow suites. IBM Cognos Analytics includes granular permissions and RBAC, but it also warns that advanced configuration requires governance discipline to avoid role sprawl.
Overloading a dataset without validating refresh and authoring throughput
Zoho Analytics warns that large datasets need careful refresh and model design for stable throughput. Power BI calls out that large models can slow authoring and dashboard performance without tuning, so model size must be planned alongside refresh schedules.
Underestimating template development effort for pixel-perfect and crosstab-heavy layouts
JasperReports notes that complex layouts and crosstabs can increase template development effort. Bold Reports and Telerik Reporting also support pixel-precise layouts, but Bold Reports cautions that advanced layouts need design-time tuning to match complex data edges.
Leaving embedded ownership and link mapping unmanaged for governed sharing
Looker Studio flags that cross-team governance needs careful link and ownership management. Domo also notes governed distribution setup takes more configuration than ad hoc sharing, which can break recurring delivery expectations when governance is added late.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Bold Reports, Zoho Analytics, Telerik Reporting, Tableau, Power BI, Looker Studio, Domo, Stimulsoft, JasperReports, and IBM Cognos Analytics using features, ease, and value as separate scoring drivers with features at 40% weight and ease and value at 30% each. Features scoring emphasized automated export behavior like REST-driven report runs, server-side scheduling, report bursting, and parameterized reuse across templates.
Ease scoring prioritized how quickly teams can get recurring delivery running with stable refresh and consistent layout output. Value scoring favored environments where semantic model governance and RBAC boundaries reduce metric drift and reduce repeated rebuild work, and Bold Reports stood apart by coupling embedded reporting with REST-driven report runs that reuse the same report artifacts for both embedding and automated exports.
Frequently Asked Questions About online reporting software
How do embedded reporting workflows differ between Bold Reports, Stimulsoft, and Telerik Reporting?
Which tools support report execution automation through APIs or programmatic services?
When do scheduled delivery and report bursting become necessary instead of manual exports?
How do parameterized reports and interactive drill paths work in Zoho Analytics versus Looker Studio?
What breaks if governed row-level security and shared permissions are missing in self-service reporting?
Where does live data behavior fall short compared with scheduled refresh and cached extracts?
Which platform best fits pixel-perfect report layouts across multiple hosting surfaces?
How do admin controls differ for publishing and sharing across Tableau, Power BI, and Zoho Analytics?
What data-migration or model-alignment issues typically appear when moving from ad hoc exports to a semantic model?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Data Science Analytics alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of data science analytics tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare data science analytics tools→