GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Medical Document Scanning Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of medical document scanning software for clinics and practices, comparing ABBYY Vantage, OnBase, and DocuWare reviews and features.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
ABBYY Vantage is the best fit when recurring medical intake forms need accurate extraction and controlled capture-to-EHR ingestion, while OnBase works better for healthcare teams that want enterprise scanning, indexing, and workflow routing inside a single content stack.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ABBYY Vantage
Handwriting recognition tied to configurable field extraction so handwritten identifiers land in structured index fields.
Built for fits when recurring intake forms need accurate extraction and controlled capture-to-EHR ingestion workflows..
OnBase
Editor pickWorkflow-driven capture that routes scanned content into case and records processes with consistent indexing and controlled handling.
Built for fits when healthcare teams need capture automation and workflow routing inside an enterprise content stack..
DocuWare
Editor pickConfigurable document workflows and retention controls linked to document metadata, not just scanned file storage.
Built for fits when practices need governed document capture plus configurable routing across varied clinical paperwork..
Comparison Table
ABBYY Vantage
API-firstAI document processing software for extracting structured data from medical forms and records.
Handwriting recognition tied to configurable field extraction so handwritten identifiers land in structured index fields.
ABBYY Vantage is a capture and document processing stack that focuses on recognition quality and controlled routing of documents into structured results. Its workflow configuration supports duplex batch scanning and per-document actions like classification, separation, and field extraction prior to chart assembly. The recognition suite includes OCR plus handwriting recognition, which is directly relevant for intake forms and clinical notes captured by scanning teams.
A notable tradeoff is that recognition and extraction performance depends on structured input preparation and well-tuned templates for each document set. ABBYY Vantage fits best when a medical practice has recurring paper document types, a consistent scanner setup, and a need to push extracted fields into an EHR or DMS integration path rather than only storing images.
- +Strong OCR plus handwriting recognition for mixed clinical document types
- +Configurable extraction pipelines for patient-facing indexing fields
- +Batch-friendly workflows for automatic document feeder throughput
- +Document classification and separation before results are committed
- –Workflow tuning requires template discipline per document set
- –Handwriting recognition accuracy drops with low-quality scans
Medical records operations
Batch intake form conversion
Faster chart-ready document assembly
Revenue cycle teams
Claim packet document classification
Reduced manual sorting effort
Show 1 more scenario
Health IT integration team
Capture results into DMS workflows
Lower re-keying during ingestion
Connects capture outputs to downstream repositories using integration points for ingesting extracted fields.
Best for: Fits when recurring intake forms need accurate extraction and controlled capture-to-EHR ingestion workflows.
OnBase
enterpriseEnterprise content management software for scanning, indexing, routing, and storing medical records.
Workflow-driven capture that routes scanned content into case and records processes with consistent indexing and controlled handling.
OnBase supports high-volume scanning workflows with document capture controls, batch handling, and content routing based on extracted fields and indexing rules. OCR and intelligent recognition support text search and metadata extraction for scanned pages, including common healthcare identifiers used for filing.
A key tradeoff is the governance and configuration burden that comes with tying capture rules to enterprise workflows and permissions. It fits when an organization already runs Hyland content and workflow capabilities and needs capture to feed chart assembly or records requests with traceable handling.
- +Enterprise workflow integration connects capture to downstream records handling
- +Batch and duplex scanning support reduces operator time per document set
- +OCR-driven indexing improves searchability and filing accuracy
- +Audit-oriented document handling fits regulated operating models
- –Capture configuration requires governance discipline to avoid misrouting
- –Search and retrieval experience depends on consistent indexing rules
- –Workflow design effort can be significant for small scanning teams
- –Some automation paths rely on additional configuration across systems
Health system IT and governance
Standardize scanning into records workflows
More consistent filing outcomes
Medical records operations
Reduce manual indexing during chart intake
Lower indexing rework
Show 1 more scenario
Claims and release-of-information teams
Automate document intake for ROI requests
Faster request processing
Scanned documents are classified and assigned to workflow queues with traceable handling.
Best for: Fits when healthcare teams need capture automation and workflow routing inside an enterprise content stack.
DocuWare
SMBCloud and on-premises document management software for scanning and indexing clinical records.
Configurable document workflows and retention controls linked to document metadata, not just scanned file storage.
DocuWare’s capture-to-workflow path is designed around turning scanned pages into managed documents with metadata and downstream routing. Healthcare teams can use recognition and field extraction to reduce manual indexing while still controlling what gets stored and who can access it through role-based governance and audit visibility. Admins can configure document types and workflow steps so intake, routing, and release-of-information processes follow consistent patterns.
A practical tradeoff is that the strongest results depend on careful configuration of document classes, indexing rules, and workflow triggers for each intake channel. DocuWare fits best when a medical practice needs repeatable capture for mixed document types and wants governance over retention and access, not just ad hoc scanning.
- +Configurable intake workflows tied to document types and metadata
- +Strong governance features with audit trail support for access changes
- +Integration options for connecting captured documents to other systems
- +Support for batch scanning and automated classification during intake
- –Indexing quality depends on well-tuned document classes and rules
- –Workflow configuration effort can be high for multi-site intake
Medical records teams
Route scanned chart documents to correct queues
Fewer misfiled documents
Practice administrators
Enforce access and retention for documents
Clear compliance documentation
Show 1 more scenario
IT and systems teams
Integrate document intake with internal apps
Less manual transfer
Integration capabilities connect document capture outputs to downstream systems.
Best for: Fits when practices need governed document capture plus configurable routing across varied clinical paperwork.
Laserfiche
enterpriseDocument management software with scanning, OCR, workflows, and healthcare records administration.
Laserfiche class-based indexing and workflow actions that tie scan output to governed document behavior.
Laserfiche combines medical document capture with a governed ECM workflow, built around configurable indexing, retention, and audit trail records. It supports batch and duplex scanning with OCR output and document separation rules that drive patient-chart assembly.
Admin controls focus on permissions, class-level configuration, and traceable document activity for regulated environments. Extensibility and integration are available through Laserfiche scripting and connector options that connect scanning and indexing into downstream healthcare systems.
- +Configurable document classes for consistent indexing across high-volume scanning
- +End-to-end audit trail records for document access and workflow actions
- +Batch capture supports duplex scanning for faster paper-to-digital conversion
- +Extensibility via scripting and connectors supports healthcare integration patterns
- –Complex capture configuration can slow setup for teams without admin support
- –Some OCR and separation behaviors require iterative tuning on varied paper quality
Best for: Fits when care teams need governed scanning capture feeding consistent chart assembly workflows.
M-Files
enterpriseMetadata-driven document management software for controlled medical records and clinical content.
Metadata-driven workflows that let rules assign document properties and route records through approvals after capture.
M-Files performs medical document capture by routing scanned images into a managed records workflow and associating them with controlled metadata. The core distinction is its metadata-first model and configurable workflow states that drive indexing, classification, and downstream retrieval.
M-Files supports audit logging and retention-oriented governance patterns that align with healthcare record controls. It also provides APIs for integration and automation so scanning outputs can feed document management and release workflows.
- +Metadata-first document model supports consistent classification and retrieval
- +Configurable workflow states enforce document handling steps and approvals
- +Audit log and retention-friendly governance patterns support compliance operations
- +API and automation surface supports integration with external capture tools
- –Scanning hardware integration often needs additional configuration work
- –Complex indexing and automation rules take administrator governance discipline
- –Handwriting and advanced ICA quality for rough scans depends on upstream OCR
- –Healthcare chart assembly automation requires careful workflow design
Best for: Fits when governance-driven practices need consistent metadata, audit trails, and workflow control around scanned records.
Square 9 GlobalSearch
SMBDocument management and capture software for scanning, indexing, and retrieving healthcare records.
Identifier-driven indexing during ingestion so scanned documents can be searched and assembled in patient context.
Square 9 GlobalSearch targets healthcare practices that need paper-to-digital conversion feeding into searchable chart documents. It supports document capture workflows and search across indexed fields to reduce manual chart hunting.
GlobalSearch focuses on extracting and using identifier metadata during ingestion so scanned documents can be tied back to the right patient context. For practices already standardizing on Square 9’s document services, it supports operational workflows around document retrieval and audit-ready storage practices.
- +Search-first retrieval model for fast chart lookup across scanned content
- +Identifier-based document indexing supports patient-context association
- +Workflow consistency for batch and ad hoc scanning through guided ingestion
- +Document quality checks and image handling support usable searchable output
- –API and automation surface is less visible than large ECM vendors
- –Advanced capture outcomes depend on correct indexing field configuration
- –Limited evidence of deep healthcare interoperability packaging in the capture layer
- –Role separation and audit log controls require careful administration design
Best for: Fits when practices need searchable chart retrieval from scanned batches tied to patient identifiers.
SimpleIndex
SMBScanning and indexing software for converting paper medical files into searchable digital records.
Indexing-centric capture workflows with configurable field mapping for consistent patient identifier and metadata extraction across batches.
SimpleIndex focuses on document capture workflows that center on indexing, cleanup, and repeatable scanning batches for healthcare teams. It supports page-level image handling and OCR-driven fields so scanned charts can be turned into searchable, metadata-rich documents.
Batch-oriented configuration and field mapping reduce per-document manual effort, especially when patient identifiers must be captured consistently. The admin and governance story depends on how the capture system is deployed alongside the practice’s document management and EHR interfaces.
- +Batch configuration reduces repetitive indexing work across large scan runs
- +OCR extracts fields for indexing so searchable outputs stay consistent
- +Image cleanup features help salvage skewed or noisy scans
- +Field mapping supports repeatable document labeling for chart assembly
- –Healthcare interface depth can be limited versus enterprise document platforms
- –Complex governance needs require disciplined configuration and oversight
Best for: Fits when practices need repeatable scanning batches with strong indexing and OCR field capture, not full enterprise workflow suites.
FileHold
SMBDocument management software with scanning, OCR, permissions, and retention controls for healthcare files.
Document separation plus indexing templates designed to keep scan batches aligned with retrieval and chart assembly rules.
FileHold focuses on medical document scanning workflows that combine capture, OCR, and document management in one administrative environment. It supports batch and ad hoc scanning with automatic document separation and indexing fields used for chart assembly and retrieval.
Healthcare-specific deployments typically pair it with interoperability work for EHR document access and retention governance, including audit visibility for changes and access events. It is best assessed on how well its scan-to-DMS pipeline matches existing identifier rules and how quickly batch throughput can be tuned for quality and consistency.
- +Batch capture supports consistent indexing fields across high-volume scanning
- +Configurable document separation reduces manual sorting steps
- +OCR output supports searchable PDF use for clinical retrieval
- +Audit visibility helps track document access and processing changes
- –Identifier matching rules need careful configuration to avoid misfiling
- –Advanced capture tuning can require governance discipline across sites
Best for: Fits when clinics need a configurable scan-to-DMS workflow with audit visibility and repeatable indexing rules.
Nanonets
API-firstCloud document processing software for extracting data from medical forms, invoices, and records.
Programmable extraction and classification workflows that can be orchestrated through the API for custom document capture pipelines.
Nanonets performs paper-to-digital medical document capture by turning scanned pages into structured fields and searchable outputs. It supports OCR plus classification and extraction workflows that map extracted text to document-specific outputs for downstream chart assembly and reporting.
Automation is built around configurable ingestion pipelines and API-driven processing for repeatable batch and ad hoc scanning. The differentiator is extensibility through programmable document parsing and workflow orchestration for healthcare-adjacent capture use cases.
- +API-first ingestion and processing for connecting scanners to document workflows
- +Configurable classification and metadata extraction for document type routing
- +Support for searchable PDF outputs for clinician-facing review
- +Document quality checks for reducing rework from blurred or low-contrast scans
- –Healthcare record matching workflows need careful rules design to avoid mis-linked patients
- –Advanced throughput requires tuning extraction confidence thresholds and batching strategy
- –RBAC and audit-log coverage can require extra configuration for strict governance
- –Handwriting recognition quality depends heavily on scan quality and form consistency
Best for: Fits when teams need programmable medical document capture with API-driven automation and extraction mapping.
Rossum
API-firstCloud-based intelligent document processing for extracting data from healthcare documents.
Training and configuration for document-specific extraction rules, exposed through an automation and API surface.
Rossum focuses on healthcare paper-to-digital capture with AI-based document understanding that turns scanned pages into structured fields. It supports batch and high-volume intake with OCR plus document classification and separation to reduce manual indexing.
Rossum also provides an API and automation surface for mapping extracted fields to downstream systems like document management and EHR workflows. Admin controls center on role-based access, audit logging, and configurable processing pipelines for consistent capture behavior across locations.
- +API-first extraction pipeline for mapping fields into EHR and DMS workflows
- +Document classification and separation to reduce manual document splitting
- +Configurable parsing rules for consistent indexing across document variants
- +Audit log supports governance during document capture and review
- –Quality depends on training and rule tuning for each document family
- –Handwriting recognition needs validation on low-quality scans
Best for: Fits when multi-site practices need automated indexing with an API-driven integration into record systems.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 healthcare medicine, ABBYY Vantage stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right medical document scanning software
Medical document scanning software turns paper intake and clinical paperwork into searchable digital documents, then pushes extracted fields into chart assembly and records workflows. This buyer guide covers ABBYY Vantage, OnBase, and DocuWare alongside nine other capture and indexing platforms that support duplex scanning, batch capture, and document classification.
The tool reviews that come before this guide already cover capture behavior, extraction accuracy, and workflow configuration effort. This opener reframes those capabilities around integration depth, extraction data structures, automation and API surfaces, and admin governance controls that affect day-to-day routing and retrieval.
Medical Document Scanning Software for Paper-to-Digital Conversion and Governed Capture Workflows
Medical document scanning software captures paper through batch scanning and duplex capture, then converts images into searchable outputs using OCR or handwriting recognition and structured indexing. The extracted fields then support document classification, separation, and chart assembly so scanned content is retrieved in a patient context rather than as a flat file store.
ABBYY Vantage is positioned around configurable extraction pipelines that connect handwriting recognition to structured index fields for controlled capture-to-ingestion outcomes. OnBase and DocuWare use workflow-driven capture to route scanned documents into downstream case and records handling with governance controls such as audit trail support for access changes.
Capture-to-index capabilities that control routing and retrieval quality
Medical document scanning software succeeds or fails on how reliably it turns paper into consistent index fields that downstream records workflows can trust. These capabilities determine whether teams can assemble charts in patient context or end up with manual cleanup and misfiled documents.
The tools in this category differ most in extraction structure and workflow governance. ABBYY Vantage focuses on handwriting-linked field extraction, OnBase and DocuWare focus on workflow-driven capture routing, and the rest vary in how much governance they attach to scan outputs and metadata behavior.
Structured extraction from printed and handwritten identifiers
ABBYY Vantage ties handwriting recognition to configurable field extraction so handwritten identifiers land in structured index fields. Rossum and Nanonets also provide rule-driven extraction, but Rossum’s quality depends more on training for each document family.
Workflow-driven capture routing into case and records handling
OnBase routes scanned content into enterprise records processes with consistent indexing and controlled handling. DocuWare also uses configurable intake workflows, with governance controls that link routing and retention behavior to document metadata.
Governance controls tied to scan metadata and auditability
DocuWare provides governance features with audit trail support for access changes tied to document metadata rather than scanned file storage. Laserfiche offers end-to-end audit trail records for document access and workflow actions, which helps track who did what after capture.
Indexing governance that protects search and retrieval outcomes
DocuWare and Laserfiche both rely on well-tuned document classes and indexing rules so retrieval aligns with governed routing and separation. Square 9 GlobalSearch uses identifier-driven indexing during ingestion, but retrieval quality depends heavily on correct indexing field configuration.
Automation surface for ingestion pipelines and custom orchestration
Nanonets is programmable with an API-first ingestion and processing approach for custom capture pipelines. Rossum and Square 9 GlobalSearch expose automation and indexing behavior through integration surfaces, but Nanonets is the most explicitly API-centered for building bespoke workflows.
Batch scanning configuration that reduces repeated operator work
OnBase reduces operator time with batch and duplex scanning support that feeds workflow processes with consistent indexing rules. SimpleIndex also emphasizes batch configuration so teams can apply repeatable field mapping across large scan runs without rebuilding indexing each time.
Choose by capture philosophy: extraction-centric, workflow-centric, or programmable pipelines
The right medical document scanning software depends on which failure mode matters most in daily operations: inconsistent field extraction, misrouting through workflows, or brittle automation that breaks under real paper variation. The tools below align to different control points where teams can standardize outcomes.
The fastest path to a good fit starts by matching the product’s strongest control mechanism to the intake structure the practice actually uses. ABBYY Vantage is designed around configurable extraction pipelines, OnBase and DocuWare are designed around governed workflow routing, and Nanonets and Rossum are designed around API-driven automation and extraction rules.
Start with the identifier problem: handwritten fields, printed forms, or both
If recurring intake forms include handwritten identifiers that must map into structured index fields, ABBYY Vantage is built around handwriting recognition tied to configurable field extraction. If handwritten performance is a concern but the practice can enforce cleaner scan quality and template discipline, Rossum can work well after validation on low-quality scans.
Match routing needs to workflow governance depth
If intake documents must be routed into case and records processes with consistent indexing and controlled handling, OnBase and DocuWare align to workflow-driven capture. If teams need retention controls and access auditability linked to document metadata behavior during routing, DocuWare and Laserfiche attach governance to scan outputs more directly.
Decide how much configuration governance the practice can enforce
If document classes and rules can be tuned and governed across document sets, Laserfiche and DocuWare support consistent indexing and governed scan-to-behavior outcomes. If configuration governance discipline is limited, ABBYY Vantage’s extraction pipeline templates still require tuning, but the handwriting-to-field mapping focus is narrower and easier to control per document family.
Use API-driven orchestration when capture logic must be custom-coded
If the practice needs programmable extraction and classification pipelines orchestrated through an API, Nanonets provides the most explicit API-first ingestion approach. If multi-site indexing must be automated through an API but extraction accuracy can be maintained through rule tuning and validation, Rossum’s training-driven approach can fit.
Choose batch and separation behavior based on operator workflow volume
If operator time is the bottleneck, OnBase’s batch and duplex scanning support reduces per-document handling before routing. If the practice struggles with manual sorting of mixed paperwork, FileHold’s document separation plus indexing templates can keep batches aligned with chart assembly rules.
Validate retrieval model against how clinicians search and assemble charts
If the practice assembles charts by patient-context lookup, Square 9 GlobalSearch uses identifier-driven indexing during ingestion to support fast chart retrieval. If retrieval must stay consistent across varied clinical paperwork, M-Files and DocuWare push governance through metadata-driven workflows that route and enforce document handling steps after capture.
Who benefits from each approach to medical document scanning and governed capture
Medical document scanning software fits practices differently because capture inputs differ, and governance requirements differ. Some teams need extraction accuracy for handwritten identifiers, while other teams need workflow routing and auditability across multi-site intake.
The segments below align to how ABBYY Vantage, OnBase, and DocuWare are positioned in the top set, then map the rest of the list to the closest operational need.
Practices with recurring forms that include handwriting for patient identifiers
ABBYY Vantage is built around configurable handwriting-linked field extraction so handwritten identifiers land in structured index fields. This fits capture-to-ingestion workflows where indexing consistency drives downstream chart assembly and retrieval.
Enterprise teams that route scanned documents into regulated case and records processes
OnBase provides workflow-driven capture that routes scanned content into case and records processes with consistent indexing and controlled handling. DocuWare also supports configurable intake workflows with audit trail support for access changes tied to document metadata.
Multi-site practices that need governed retention and workflow actions tied to metadata
DocuWare connects configurable document workflows and retention controls to document metadata behavior rather than scanned file storage. Laserfiche adds end-to-end audit trail records for document access and workflow actions for post-capture governance.
Teams building custom capture pipelines that require API-driven orchestration
Nanonets is API-first for ingestion and processing, which supports programmable extraction and classification workflows. Rossum also exposes an automation and API surface, but its field mapping quality depends on training and rule tuning per document family.
Common implementation failures that degrade indexing, routing, and retrieval
Medical document scanning projects fail when governance choices get postponed until after capture volume rises. Misfiled documents usually trace back to indexing rule gaps, workflow configuration drift, or insufficient validation of extraction confidence on real paper quality.
The mistakes below are drawn from how specific tools describe their own constraints and dependencies around templates, rules, and document classes.
Relying on handwritten extraction without validating scan quality and field mapping on real intake sets
ABBYY Vantage’s handwriting recognition accuracy drops with low-quality scans, so validation must include the practice’s worst-case paper conditions. Rossum also needs rule tuning per document family, so incomplete training will show up as incorrect field mappings.
Configuring capture routing once and allowing indexing rules to drift across operators
OnBase warns that capture configuration requires governance discipline to avoid misrouting, and search retrieval depends on consistent indexing rules. DocuWare similarly ties indexing quality to well-tuned document classes and routing rules, so drift undermines controlled handling.
Overbuilding workflow automation without budgeting time for document class tuning
DocuWare notes that workflow configuration effort can be high for multi-site intake, and Laserfiche describes iterative tuning for separation and OCR behaviors on varied paper quality. Treat document class and rule tuning as a recurring operational task, not a one-time setup.
Assuming patient-context search works without strict identifier field configuration
Square 9 GlobalSearch uses identifier-driven indexing during ingestion, so incorrect indexing field configuration breaks patient-context association. SimpleIndex also centers on indexing field mapping, so inconsistent field mapping across batches will degrade search outputs.
Using API-first extraction without designing patient matching rules and batching strategy
Nanonets says healthcare record matching workflows need careful rules design to avoid mis-linked patients, and it highlights tuning extraction confidence thresholds and batching strategy for advanced throughput. Rossum also depends on training for each document family, so untested pipelines create downstream indexing inconsistencies.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated ABBYY Vantage, OnBase, and DocuWare plus seven other medical document capture and indexing platforms based on how reliably they convert paper into structured retrieval outcomes. Features carried 40% weight because capture behavior, handwriting-linked field extraction, workflow routing, and retention governance determine operational success.
Ease and value each carried 30% weight because capture configuration effort, batch setup behavior, and tuning discipline affect day-to-day usability. ABBYY Vantage placed first because handwriting recognition tied to configurable field extraction delivered a more direct control point for structured indexing than workflow-only routing or API-first programmable extraction approaches.
Frequently Asked Questions About medical document scanning software
How do ABBYY Vantage and OnBase handle document separation and classification before indexing?
Which tool is better for handwriting-heavy forms, ABBYY Vantage or DocuWare?
How do FileHold and SimpleIndex support repeatable batch scanning and consistent metadata capture?
When does M-Files’ metadata-first workflow model matter more than document-first capture?
What breaks if patient identifier matching is inconsistent across incoming scans in Square 9 GlobalSearch and Rossum?
Which integration path is more central: ABBYY Vantage connection points or Rossum’s automation and API surface?
How do admin controls differ between Laserfiche and OnBase for regulated scanning workflows?
What tradeoff appears when using workflow-driven capture in OnBase versus retention controls in DocuWare?
How do Nanonets and Rossum support programmable extraction workflows for custom document types?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Physical Therapy Electronic Medical Records Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Healthcare Facility Management Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Healthcare Training Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Urology Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Healthcare Business Intelligence Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Healthcare Medicine alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of healthcare medicine tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare healthcare medicine tools→