GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Marketing Mapping Software of 2026
Top 10 marketing mapping software ranked by features and use cases for planning, including Creately, FigJam, and FlowMapp.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
MindManager is the best fit if your marketing team wants diagram-first planning with linked dependencies and field-based work tracking, whereas Creately suits teams that need template-driven mapping collaboration fast without engineering workflow structure.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
MindManager
Custom attribute fields on map nodes let planning diagrams carry execution-ready task data.
Built for fits when marketing teams need diagram-first planning with linked dependencies and field-based work tracking..
Creately
Editor pickReusable shape libraries and template canvases keep swimlane marketing maps consistent across projects.
Built for fits when marketing teams need fast, template-driven mapping collaboration without heavy workflow engineering..
UXPressia
Editor pickPublish journey maps as review-ready pages with consistent navigation across audiences and stages.
Built for fits when marketing teams need repeatable journey maps with shareable publish outputs..
Comparison Table
MindManager
enterpriseMindManager combines mind maps, process diagrams, timelines, and planning boards for marketing work.
Custom attribute fields on map nodes let planning diagrams carry execution-ready task data.
MindManager is strongest when marketing planning needs a single diagram as the source of truth for ideas, work items, and dependencies. Node-level metadata like custom attributes helps represent campaign sections and deliverables, while hyperlinking supports navigation across briefs, specs, and reference materials. Relationship links between nodes support traceability across touchpoints and workstreams, and map layouts help teams compare scenarios by duplicating maps and adjusting branches.
A key tradeoff is that MindManager collaboration and governance features are not as centralized as dedicated marketing workflow suites, so larger organizations often need external conventions for change control. A common usage situation is a channel planning cycle where a team maps campaign steps into a hierarchical plan, assigns owners in node fields, and exports a shareable diagram for stakeholder review.
- +Node-level custom fields support campaign deliverables and ownership tracking
- +Links between nodes create practical dependency paths across workstreams
- +Map layouts support scenario comparison via branch restructuring
- +Exports to common formats support stakeholder sharing without extra tooling
- –Advanced governance controls are limited compared with dedicated marketing ops systems
- –Large diagram performance depends heavily on map size and link density
- –Cross-system workflow automation requires extra setup and external integrations
- –Realtime multi-editor workflows are less central than diagram authoring
Campaign managers
Campaign dependency mapping in one diagram
Fewer missed dependencies
Marketing operations teams
UTM governance and labeling plan
Consistent tagging
Show 2 more scenarios
Creative leads
Channel content-to-stage planning
Cleaner creative handoffs
Organize content batches under stages and link to specs for clear handoffs.
Product marketers
Audience segmentation work breakdown
Tighter segment execution
Represent segments as branches and attach positioning and asset requirements per segment.
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need diagram-first planning with linked dependencies and field-based work tracking.
Creately
SMBCreately combines diagramming, visual workspaces, templates, and data-linked marketing maps.
Reusable shape libraries and template canvases keep swimlane marketing maps consistent across projects.
Creately fits teams that need visual campaign mapping with consistent structure, because canvases support reusable shapes, layers, and connector styles that keep maps readable. Template-driven planning reduces the time spent restyling swimlane workflows when teams compare scenarios across channels. Real collaboration workflows include element-level commenting and multi-user editing on the same canvas.
A common tradeoff is that fine-grained version control and governance controls are not the primary strength compared with diagram tools focused on enterprise auditability. Creately is best used for planning artifacts and working sessions where teams iterate quickly on mapping structure, then publish static exports for wider stakeholders.
- +Swimlane diagram layouts make stage and ownership mapping straightforward
- +Template library speeds up funnel and journey worksheet setup
- +Element-level commenting keeps feedback tied to specific map parts
- +Diagram export supports quick sharing in non-diagram tools
- –Advanced RBAC and audit log depth lag tools built for regulated governance
- –Automation for marketing workflows is limited to mapping-level interactions
Growth marketing teams
Campaign dependency mapping by stage
Fewer missed handoffs
Customer success operations
Lifecycle stage mapping for onboarding
Clear stage ownership
Show 1 more scenario
Agency account teams
Scenario comparison for channel mix
Faster client alignment
Agencies duplicate template canvases to compare omnichannel channel paths for the same objective.
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need fast, template-driven mapping collaboration without heavy workflow engineering.
UXPressia
vertical specialistPlatform for creating customer journey maps and marketing impact chains.
Publish journey maps as review-ready pages with consistent navigation across audiences and stages.
UXPressia is built around journey-map authoring with structured elements such as stages, touchpoints, and audience viewpoints, which makes diagrams easier to standardize across teams. Teams can create reusable templates and collaborate on journey drafts, then publish maps for review workflows outside the diagram editor. Exports and sharing options cover common stakeholder needs like slide-ready visuals and shareable views, which reduces rework when maps move from workshops into planning decks.
A practical tradeoff is that automation and API-driven governance are not the core differentiator versus diagram-first tools, so advanced journey orchestration still requires external workflow systems. UXPressia works well for mid-cycle planning where teams need consistent journey structure and repeated scenario edits before sending outputs to marketing ops and channel owners.
- +Journey-map structure supports consistent staging and touchpoint organization
- +Publishable journey pages reduce handoff friction from workshop to review
- +Template-driven authoring speeds up repeated mapping across teams
- +Collaboration tools support iterative feedback on journey drafts
- –API and automation surface is limited compared with workflow-centric mapping tools
- –Dependency on external systems increases effort for event-to-journey linkage
- –Highly customized diagram logic often needs manual layout work
- –Governance features are not granular enough for enterprise automation patterns
Marketing strategy teams
Plan lifecycle stages and touchpoints
Faster alignment on journey priorities
Channel marketing teams
Coordinate channel-specific campaign touchpoints
Clear accountability for channel execution
Show 2 more scenarios
Marketing operations teams
Standardize journey templates for reuse
Lower rework across planning cycles
Apply templates to keep funnel and journey diagrams consistent across quarters.
Customer experience teams
Compare customer journeys by scenario
More confident journey iteration
Create parallel journey drafts for scenario reviews before committing to changes.
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need repeatable journey maps with shareable publish outputs.
Miro
SMBMiro provides collaborative canvases for marketing maps, customer journeys, funnels, and campaign planning.
Board-to-external-workflow extensibility via Miro APIs and webhooks for syncing mapping context with external systems.
Miro delivers marketing mapping workspaces built for visual planning, with diagramming, structured templates, and real-time collaboration. Marketing teams can maintain journey maps and campaign plans using sticky notes, swimlanes, frames, and linkable pages that support cross-channel traceability.
The automation surface includes board-level integrations, webhook-friendly data flows for connected apps, and configurable permissions through workspace roles and team controls. Governance stays practical for distributed planning because templates, folders, and access controls help standardize how mapping artifacts are created and shared.
- +Frames and swimlanes support structured journey and campaign layouts
- +Template library speeds up consistent mapping formats across teams
- +Fine-grained sharing controls work for multi-team planning boards
- +Integrations and API enable connected workflows and external data sync
- –Large boards can slow navigation when many objects are added
- –Data lineage for marketing metrics depends on external systems rather than native fields
- –Advanced automation often requires setup in connected apps
- –Versioning is limited compared with document-centric workflow tools
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need cross-channel mapping and collaboration in a single workspace with integrations.
Mural
enterpriseMural offers collaborative canvases and templates for journey maps, personas, and marketing workshops.
Mural’s live collaborative whiteboarding model keeps swimlane-style marketing maps editable during stakeholder review sessions.
Mural turns marketing mapping work into shared visual boards for journey and planning sessions. It provides swimlane-style diagrams, templates for common marketing map formats, and a structured way to capture decisions and supporting notes next to each artifact.
Real-time collaboration supports workshops where multiple stakeholders edit the same canvas during mapping and review cycles. Mural also connects mapping outputs to broader workflows through integrations and an extensibility surface that fits organizations already using other marketing and analytics tools.
- +Real-time collaboration on the same marketing map reduces workshop handoffs
- +Template library covers journey and campaign mapping patterns for faster drafting
- +Commenting and structured notes keep decisions tied to diagram elements
- +Integration options support moving map artifacts into existing marketing workflows
- –Permissioning and governance require careful board hygiene for large teams
- –Advanced automation needs external workflow tools rather than built-in engines
- –Export formats can limit fidelity for highly customized diagram layouts
- –Large canvases can feel slower when many collaborators edit simultaneously
Best for: Fits when cross-functional teams run frequent planning workshops and need shared journey mapping with collaboration controls.
Funnelytics
marketing specialistFunnelytics maps marketing funnels and connects campaign steps to conversion data.
Dependency-aware funnel and touchpoint mapping that keeps campaign steps linked for planning reviews.
Funnelytics is a marketing mapping tool aimed at teams that need campaign-level planning with measurable journey steps. It focuses on structuring funnels and touchpoints into a visual map that can be used for review cycles and dependency checks.
The software supports workflow-style collaboration around mapping decisions and can connect map elements to execution-ready identifiers like channel and campaign fields. For governance, it emphasizes configuration discipline so mappings stay consistent across sessions and stakeholders.
- +Campaign mapping stays tied to funnel steps for planning-to-execution clarity
- +Collaboration workflows reduce rework during journey map review cycles
- +Configurable identifiers keep channel and campaign fields consistent across maps
- +Dependency checking supports clearer handoffs between stages and assets
- –Complex cross-channel layouts require careful configuration to stay readable
- –API and automation surface appears limited versus mapping tools built for integrations
- –Bulk refactors across many maps can be slow during frequent campaign changes
- –Governance relies on user discipline more than enforced RBAC controls
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need campaign dependency mapping with reviewable funnel and touchpoint diagrams.
FlowMapp
marketing specialistFlowMapp maps website structures, user flows, customer journeys, and content planning activities.
Scenario comparison via map duplication for rapid what-if journey planning across channels and stages.
FlowMapp pairs visual journey mapping with a workflow-oriented editor for planning channel, campaign, and stage dependencies. It supports scenario comparisons by duplicating and editing whole maps, which helps teams test alternate paths without rebuilding diagrams.
Diagram elements link to structured nodes so teams can keep touchpoint decisions consistent across versions. Collaboration features focus on shared canvases and review-friendly map outputs.
- +Scenario comparison works by duplicating and editing entire maps.
- +Structured node linking keeps touchpoints and stages consistent across the diagram.
- +Swimlane-style layouts make responsibility and channel ownership easier to scan.
- +Map exports support stakeholder review with clear visual hierarchy.
- –Granular automation requires more manual planning than event-driven orchestration.
- –Large diagrams can become harder to navigate without rigorous layout discipline.
- –Cross-system data governance like UTM rules is not a native control plane.
- –API and automation hooks feel limited compared with tools focused on integrations.
Best for: Fits when teams need scenario-based journey planning with clear swimlane layouts and repeatable map versions.
TheyDo
enterpriseTheyDo organizes customer journeys, opportunities, and product discovery work in a shared workspace.
TheyDo’s dependency-aware mapping workflow links planning objects to launch states for controlled handoffs across teams.
TheyDo is a marketing mapping tool built for planning and operationalizing channel and campaign dependencies in shared workspaces. Core capabilities include visual map editing with reusable components, workflow-style states for launch planning, and export-ready artifacts for teams that need consistent views.
Automation and integration support focus on connecting mapping objects to external execution systems, including web and tracking inputs used to keep maps aligned with what runs. Governance is handled through workspace controls and change visibility so stakeholders can review what moved and why.
- +Visual dependency mapping ties launch steps to owning teams and deadlines
- +Reusable elements reduce rework across campaign and channel maps
- +Integration options connect mapping plans to tracking inputs and execution systems
- +Shared workspace workflows support review cycles without losing map context
- –Advanced configuration of mapping workflows can slow initial setup
- –Complex maps can become hard to navigate without strict naming discipline
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need campaign dependency mapping and review workflows that stay consistent across many owners.
Microsoft Visio
enterpriseDiagramming application for building marketing journey maps, process flows, and channel dependency diagrams.
Master shapes with layers let teams enforce reusable journey map styling across campaigns in Visio files.
Microsoft Visio creates and edits diagrams for marketing mapping work like journey map swimlane layouts and funnel flowcharts. It supports shape libraries, layers, and master shapes for consistent touchpoint, channel, and stage visual standards across a campaign or program.
Visio also exports diagrams to common formats and can be automated through VBA and other Microsoft automation surfaces for repeatable diagram generation. Collaboration and governance depend on the organization’s Microsoft 365 and file storage setup, since Visio diagrams are managed as Office files rather than as a diagram-native database.
- +Master shapes and layers keep multi-page marketing maps visually consistent
- +Swimlane-style flowcharting supports structured journey sequencing and roles
- +VBA automation can generate diagram elements from repeatable inputs
- +Diagram export formats support sharing with stakeholders outside Microsoft tools
- –No native marketing mapping data model for stages, channels, or touchpoints
- –Automation and templating require technical effort to maintain across teams
- –Real-time journey edits are limited by file-based collaboration patterns
- –Dependency on Microsoft 365 storage and permissions increases governance overhead
Best for: Fits when teams need standardized marketing diagrams and template-driven diagram automation inside Microsoft ecosystems.
FigJam
SMBOnline whiteboard for collaborative journey mapping and campaign brainstorming sessions.
Figma file embedding inside FigJam lets teams align campaign journey visuals with live design work.
FigJam is built for visual marketing mapping where workshops and diagramming happen in the same canvas. It supports swimlane-style planning with templates, freehand and shape tools, and real-time collaboration for building customer journey maps, channel maps, and influence maps.
The workspace also connects with Figma assets, so campaign stakeholders can reference designs and component work without rebuilding artifacts. FigJam’s sharing model centers on links and embedded items, which helps teams keep mapping assets discoverable during planning sessions.
- +Real-time collaboration keeps marketing mapping sessions aligned
- +Swimlane layouts and templates accelerate journey and channel diagrams
- +Tight Figma asset referencing reduces redraw work for campaign planning
- +Link-based sharing supports fast stakeholder review cycles
- –Marketing mapping artifacts lack structured fields for stages and metrics
- –Automations depend on manual updates instead of workflow-level governance
- –Dependency mapping across multiple diagrams needs careful manual linking
- –Advanced reporting and filtering for large map libraries is limited
Best for: Fits when cross-functional marketing teams need collaborative workshop mapping without a strict data schema.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 marketing advertising, MindManager stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right marketing mapping software
Marketing mapping software supports customer journey mapping, touchpoint mapping, and campaign dependency planning by turning diagrams into shareable artifacts for cross-team review. This guide covers MindManager, Creately, UXPressia, Miro, Mural, Funnelytics, FlowMapp, TheyDo, Microsoft Visio, and FigJam based on how each tool handles collaboration structure, link-based planning, and publication or integration paths.
The strongest differences show up in how teams store planning details on the map itself and how they carry those details into handoffs. MindManager emphasizes node-level custom fields for execution-ready task data, while UXPressia focuses on publishable journey map pages for repeatable review outputs.
Marketing mapping software for building journey and campaign plans with linked diagrams
Marketing mapping software creates journey maps, funnel and touchpoint diagrams, and channel or campaign dependency views that teams can update during planning workshops and reviews. MindManager uses custom node fields and link relationships to keep deliverables, ownership, and dependency paths attached to the diagram.
Some tools prioritize fast template-driven diagramming and consistent swimlane layouts, like Creately and Miro, while others emphasize how mapping output moves into stakeholder review and reuse. UXPressia centers on publishable journey pages with consistent navigation, while FlowMapp supports scenario comparison by duplicating and editing entire maps to run what-if planning across channels and stages.
Marketing mapping features that determine handoff quality and planning control
Marketing mapping tools can store plan details directly on nodes, on swimlanes, or inside publishable pages, and those storage choices decide how durable the handoff becomes. Teams also need reliable link behavior so dependencies, touchpoints, and stages stay connected when maps move from workshop to execution.
Execution-ready attributes on diagram nodes
MindManager adds custom attribute fields on map nodes so planning diagrams carry execution-ready task data, ownership, and deliverables without switching systems. This approach supports linked dependency paths across workstreams using the same map objects.
Template-driven swimlanes for consistent campaign structure
Creately and Miro both use swimlane layouts plus reusable templates so stage and ownership mapping stays consistent across projects and teams. Creately emphasizes reusable shape libraries for worksheet speed, while Miro relies on board templates to standardize mapping formats at scale.
Publishable journey outputs for review cycles
UXPressia focuses on publishable journey maps that produce review-ready pages with consistent navigation across audiences and stages. This turns workshop diagrams into shareable outputs without requiring every stakeholder to interpret raw boards.
Integration hooks for syncing mapping context with external systems
Miro provides board-to-external-workflow extensibility using Miro APIs and webhooks so external systems can sync mapping context during planning. This differentiates it from tools that keep mapping metrics and lineage dependent on outside processes.
Scenario comparison through full-map duplication
FlowMapp enables what-if planning by duplicating and editing entire maps for scenario comparison. Structured node linking helps keep touchpoints and stages aligned across versions.
Dependency-aware mapping workflows for controlled handoffs
Funnelytics and TheyDo both maintain dependency-aware relationships so campaign steps remain linked for planning-to-execution clarity. Funnelytics ties campaign mapping to funnel steps, while TheyDo links planning objects to launch states to standardize review workflows across many owners.
Choose marketing mapping software by map-structure ownership and workflow carryover
The key decision is where the mapping software keeps planning truth, either on diagram objects as fields and links or in separate publishable outputs and external systems. The second decision is how the tool handles repeatability, because templates and map duplication patterns determine whether teams can reuse work without rework.
Pick diagram objects that carry execution data
If the planning artifact must include execution-ready fields attached to tasks, select MindManager because node-level custom fields and link relationships keep deliverables, ownership, and dependencies inside the same diagram. If the planning artifact is mainly for collaboration markup, select FigJam because it supports workshop mapping inside a Figma-linked workflow without structured fields for stages and metrics.
Decide whether repeatability comes from templates or from versioned scenarios
If teams need consistent swimlane layouts across many campaigns, select Creately or Miro because swimlane templates speed setup and reduce format drift during planning. If teams need rapid what-if comparisons, select FlowMapp because scenario comparison is implemented through duplicating and editing entire maps.
Choose how outputs move into review and stakeholder circulation
If stakeholders need publish-ready journey pages with consistent navigation, select UXPressia because publish outputs reduce handoff friction from workshops to review. If the process is repeated live during workshops, select Mural because real-time collaboration keeps swimlane-style maps editable during stakeholder review sessions.
Match your dependency workflow to the tool’s link model
If dependencies must remain tied to funnel steps for planning clarity, select Funnelytics because campaign steps stay connected to funnel and touchpoint diagrams. If launch control and ownership-driven handoffs are the primary workflow, select TheyDo because dependency-aware mapping links planning objects to launch states and owning teams.
Validate performance and navigation constraints for map scale
If projects will grow into large maps with many objects, test Miro board navigation because large boards can slow navigation when many objects are added. If projects demand heavy governance and diagram performance at scale, note MindManager link density can affect large-diagram performance even though node-level fields keep work data attached.
Who should buy marketing mapping software based on planning style
Marketing teams differ in whether they treat the map as a lightweight workshop artifact or as a planning system that must carry ownership and execution context. The best fit depends on collaboration cadence, dependency complexity, and how much the organization expects to reuse mapping patterns across campaigns.
Marketing ops teams managing ownership and deliverables inside the plan artifact
MindManager supports node-level custom fields on diagram elements so campaign deliverables and ownership tracking stay attached to the plan with links that express dependency paths.
Cross-functional teams running frequent journey mapping workshops
Mural supports live collaborative whiteboarding so swimlane-style maps remain editable during stakeholder review sessions without converting work into separate artifacts.
Digital marketing teams that need publishable journey documentation for stakeholders
UXPressia produces publishable journey map pages with consistent navigation so stakeholders can review staged touchpoint content without interpreting raw workshop boards.
Growth and lifecycle teams that iterate quickly on funnel and touchpoint plans
FlowMapp supports scenario comparison by duplicating and editing entire maps so teams can run what-if journey planning across channels and stages with repeatable map versions.
Teams coordinating campaign dependency workflows and funnel-linked touchpoints
Funnelytics and TheyDo both implement dependency-aware mapping, with Funnelytics keeping campaign steps tied to funnel stages and TheyDo linking planning objects to launch states for controlled handoffs.
Common marketing mapping software mistakes that break planning handoffs
Mistakes usually happen when teams assume diagram collaboration automatically replaces workflow governance, or when the mapping artifact cannot carry structured planning details through review. Failures also occur when scenario growth and board scale are not tested before stakeholders rely on the maps for decisions.
Using a diagram-only mapping tool when the team needs structured fields for stages, metrics, and ownership
FigJam is optimized for workshop alignment and does not provide structured fields for stages and metrics, so ownership and measurement details tend to become manual annotations instead of trackable plan data.
Assuming automation or external syncing will be native for funnel-to-metrics lineage
Miro supports board-to-external-workflow syncing via APIs and webhooks, but marketing metrics lineage depends on external systems because data lineage is not native to marketing mapping fields in the board.
Skipping dependency mapping depth and later trying to reconstruct dependencies in spreadsheets
Funnelytics ties campaign mapping to funnel steps and touchpoints, while TheyDo ties planning objects to launch states, so selecting a tool without dependency-aware planning increases rework during review cycles.
Scaling up map complexity without checking navigation and readability limits
Miro boards can slow navigation as object counts increase, and FlowMapp duplicated scenarios can become harder to navigate without rigorous layout discipline.
Treating template-driven diagrams as a complete replacement for governance controls
Creately and Miro provide template libraries for consistent swimlanes, but advanced RBAC and audit log depth lag behind mapping tools built for regulated governance, which can block reviews in compliance-heavy environments.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each marketing mapping software on how it carries planning details from diagram objects into review artifacts and downstream workflow handoffs. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking weight because MindManager’s node-level custom fields and dependency links let teams attach execution-ready data directly to the map, while UXPressia’s publishable journey pages shift value into review outputs.
Ease and value each accounted for 30% because tools like Creately and Miro accelerate repeatable swimlane mapping with template libraries, while FlowMapp’s scenario comparison reduces rework by duplicating and editing full map versions. MindManager earned the highest overall placement because its link-based planning combined with field-based work tracking keeps deliverables, ownership, and dependency paths inside the same diagram structure.
Frequently Asked Questions About marketing mapping software
How should teams choose between FlowMapp and Creately for scenario-based planning?
Which tool is better for publishing review-ready customer journey pages, not just editing diagrams?
When mapping campaign dependencies, what breaks if the diagram lacks dependency linking?
How do MindManager and Visio differ when the workflow needs structured fields on diagram elements?
How should integration needs drive the choice between Miro and FigJam?
Which mapping workflow supports controlled handoffs across teams by tracking launch states?
What security and access controls should be expected in Miro compared with file-based Visio sharing?
When migrating existing journey maps into a new workspace, where does data model friction usually appear?
How should admin controls and audit visibility be handled in Mural compared with workshop-first tools?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Sales Mapping Software of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Content Mapping Software of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Account Mapping Software of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best CRM Mapping Software of 2026
- Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Relationship Mapping Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Marketing Advertising alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of marketing advertising tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare marketing advertising tools→