GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Manufacturing EngineeringTop 8 Best Glass Fabrication Software of 2026
Discover top glass fabrication software tools to streamline workflow.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
AutoCAD
DWG file ecosystem with reusable blocks, layers, and annotation tools for detailed shop drawings
Built for glazing teams needing precise CAD documentation and DWG-based shop drawing workflows.
Revit
Curtain wall and glazing system families with parameter-driven component schedules
Built for teams standardizing glazing BIM and producing coordinated drawings and component schedules.
Siemens NX
NX Parametric Modeling with associativity for geometry reuse across fabrication drawings and NC-ready processes
Built for engineering-led glass fabrication teams needing CAD-to-CAM continuity.
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates glass fabrication software used to design, model, and produce building elements with workflows spanning from CAD detailing to structural coordination. Tools such as AutoCAD, Revit, Siemens NX, CATIA, and Tekla Structures are compared by core capabilities so readers can map each platform to specific glass fabrication tasks and integration needs.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AutoCAD Computer-aided design software used to generate glass cutting layouts, elevations, and fabrication drawings with DWG-based workflows. | CAD drafting | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 2 | Revit BIM authoring software used to model curtain wall and glazing systems and extract fabrication-ready geometry for glass elements. | BIM glazing | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 3 | Siemens NX Advanced CAD/CAM software used to generate precise glass part geometry and downstream toolpaths for production planning. | engineering suite | 8.1/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 4 | CATIA Complex system modeling software used to design assemblies and generate detailed manufacturing documentation for glazing products. | enterprise CAD | 7.9/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 5 | Tekla Structures Structural BIM modeling used to coordinate glass and façade components with reinforcement and connection detailing workflows. | BIM coordination | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.1/10 | 7.3/10 |
| 6 | SketchUp 3D modeling software used to visualize glazing concepts and export models for design-to-fabrication handoffs. | 3D modeling | 7.6/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 7 | Rhino NURBS modeling used to create complex curved glass geometries and generate fabrication-friendly surfaces. | freeform CAD | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 8 | Fusion 360 Integrated CAD and CAM used to model glass-related components and generate manufacturing documentation from parametric designs. | CAD/CAM | 7.9/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 |
Computer-aided design software used to generate glass cutting layouts, elevations, and fabrication drawings with DWG-based workflows.
BIM authoring software used to model curtain wall and glazing systems and extract fabrication-ready geometry for glass elements.
Advanced CAD/CAM software used to generate precise glass part geometry and downstream toolpaths for production planning.
Complex system modeling software used to design assemblies and generate detailed manufacturing documentation for glazing products.
Structural BIM modeling used to coordinate glass and façade components with reinforcement and connection detailing workflows.
3D modeling software used to visualize glazing concepts and export models for design-to-fabrication handoffs.
NURBS modeling used to create complex curved glass geometries and generate fabrication-friendly surfaces.
Integrated CAD and CAM used to model glass-related components and generate manufacturing documentation from parametric designs.
AutoCAD
CAD draftingComputer-aided design software used to generate glass cutting layouts, elevations, and fabrication drawings with DWG-based workflows.
DWG file ecosystem with reusable blocks, layers, and annotation tools for detailed shop drawings
AutoCAD stands out for turning glass-fabrication drawings into production-ready 2D documentation with tight control over geometry and layers. It supports DWG-based workflows that integrate with CAD standards for cut lists, elevations, and installation drawings. For glazing-specific tasks, it excels when teams already model glass assemblies in CAD and manage annotations, blocks, and drawing templates consistently. Its core strength is precise drafting and reuse of existing CAD data rather than turnkey glazing configuration.
Pros
- DWG-native precision for accurate shop drawings and dimensioned details
- Blocks and templates speed repeatable framing and glazing drawing sets
- Strong layer management supports consistent fabrication and annotation standards
Cons
- Lacks glazing-specific automation for IGU, hardware, and schedules out of the box
- Setup of templates, blocks, and standards takes ongoing CAD governance
- Spreadsheet-like logic for lists and BOMs needs manual or external processes
Best For
Glazing teams needing precise CAD documentation and DWG-based shop drawing workflows
Revit
BIM glazingBIM authoring software used to model curtain wall and glazing systems and extract fabrication-ready geometry for glass elements.
Curtain wall and glazing system families with parameter-driven component schedules
Revit stands out for turning glass and glazing detailing into a model-driven workflow using BIM families and parameters. Core capabilities include creating custom mullions, panels, and curtain wall systems, then deriving coordinated elevations, schedules, and fabrication-ready views from the same model. The software also supports clash detection with other disciplines and enforces drawing consistency through model-linked sheets.
Pros
- BIM parameters drive schedules for glazing components
- Family-based mullion and panel modeling supports custom glass systems
- Model-coordinated drawings reduce rework from mismatched documentation
- Clash detection supports coordinated facade planning across disciplines
Cons
- Fabrication-specific nesting and cut optimization requires add-ons
- Model setup and family authoring take significant training
- Scheduling can become slow with highly detailed curtain systems
- Estimating glazing fabrication labor and sequencing needs external logic
Best For
Teams standardizing glazing BIM and producing coordinated drawings and component schedules
Siemens NX
engineering suiteAdvanced CAD/CAM software used to generate precise glass part geometry and downstream toolpaths for production planning.
NX Parametric Modeling with associativity for geometry reuse across fabrication drawings and NC-ready processes
Siemens NX stands out for glass fabrication work that also needs deep CAD and manufacturing engineering in one environment. NX supports detailed surface modeling, parametric design, and associative drawings that carry geometry into downstream toolpaths and production documentation. Manufacturing workflows in NX can connect design intent to CNC-ready outputs through CAM capabilities and process-aware modeling. The result fits glass plants that require precise geometry control, integrated engineering changes, and verification-ready documentation rather than standalone shop-floor planning.
Pros
- Associative parametric modeling keeps glass layouts consistent across revisions
- High-fidelity surface and solid geometry supports complex glass profiles and cutouts
- Tight CAD to CAM connectivity supports geometry-driven manufacturing outputs
- Robust drawings and documentation reduce rework from mismatched specs
- Engineering-grade verification workflows support accuracy for fabrication tolerances
Cons
- Complex feature set creates a steep learning curve for layout-focused teams
- Shop-floor glass nesting and planning are less purpose-built than dedicated tools
- Setup and template creation take time for repeatable product families
- Automation benefits require disciplined data and workflow standardization
Best For
Engineering-led glass fabrication teams needing CAD-to-CAM continuity
CATIA
enterprise CADComplex system modeling software used to design assemblies and generate detailed manufacturing documentation for glazing products.
Parametric surface modeling with robust change propagation across glazing assemblies
CATIA stands out with deep parametric CAD foundations and strong downstream manufacturing support for complex glass and glazing geometry. It offers model-based workflows for defining shapes, surfaces, and fabrication-relevant data used across design-to-fabrication processes. The system integrates well with engineering-centric environments that already rely on structured data and rigorous change management. For glass fabrication, the practical value depends on how well local processes and shop-floor outputs map onto CATIA’s broader CAD/CAM capabilities.
Pros
- Parametric modeling supports consistent updates across complex glass assemblies.
- Strong surface and geometry tooling helps model glazing profiles and curvatures.
- Manufacturing data workflows fit engineering-led fabrication planning.
Cons
- Glass-specific automation is limited compared with specialist glazing software.
- Advanced workflows require significant training and process standardization.
- Shop-floor outputs can demand additional mapping from CAD to fabrication formats.
Best For
Engineering-led glazing teams needing parametric control for complex glass designs
Tekla Structures
BIM coordinationStructural BIM modeling used to coordinate glass and façade components with reinforcement and connection detailing workflows.
Parametric component modeling with fabrication-oriented part data and automated drawings
Tekla Structures stands out for its BIM-first modeling workflow that can drive detailed fabrication geometry with strong drawing and data output. It supports parametric, component-based modeling and can manage complex structural assemblies, which maps well to glass units that must follow exact shapes and constraints. The software also supports clash and coordination workflows through model sharing and provides fabrication-ready outputs such as drawings and part data. For glass fabrication, the strongest fit comes when the workflow is centered on BIM data and engineering-controlled geometry rather than standalone shop-floor design tools.
Pros
- Parametric modeling supports exact glass geometry and repeatable detailing
- BIM-driven drawings and part data reduce manual takeoff and rework
- Strong coordination workflows help manage interfaces with frames and anchors
- Extensible component modeling supports custom glass and framing logic
Cons
- Glass-specific workflows require modeling discipline and configuration
- Learning curve is steep for managers focused on shop layout only
- Standalone glass fabrication adjustments can feel heavy versus dedicated tools
- Model setup and detail control can slow early design iterations
Best For
Engineering-led glass fabrication teams using BIM to generate detailed shop outputs
SketchUp
3D modeling3D modeling software used to visualize glazing concepts and export models for design-to-fabrication handoffs.
Push-pull solid modeling with 3D sectioning for rapid glazing design workflows
SketchUp stands out for fast conceptual modeling using a push-pull workflow and a massive library of prebuilt components. For glass fabrication, it supports importing CAD models, laying out glazing systems, and producing scaled 3D presentations for review and estimating. It also enables drawing set creation with dimensioning and sections, supported by plugins and scripting for automation where needed. The process still relies heavily on user discipline for fabrication-ready outputs like cut lists and tolerances.
Pros
- Push-pull modeling accelerates early glazing layout and concept iterations
- Strong 3D visualization supports customer approvals and on-site coordination
- DWG and DXF import workflows help reuse existing CAD glazing geometry
- Dimensions, sections, and view exports support practical drafting deliverables
Cons
- Cut list and fabrication tolerances require add-ons or custom scripting
- Material takeoffs need careful setup since glass properties are not inherent
- Large assemblies can slow down when scenes include many components
- Modeling rules vary by team, increasing risk of inconsistent outputs
Best For
Glass contractors needing fast 3D glazing layouts and presentation drawings
Rhino
freeform CADNURBS modeling used to create complex curved glass geometries and generate fabrication-friendly surfaces.
Grasshopper parametric modeling for generating fabrication-ready geometry from design inputs
Rhino distinguishes itself with Rhino 3D modeling workflows that let fabricators generate and edit complex glass geometries directly in a NURBS-based environment. Core capabilities include solid and surface modeling, parameterized definitions via Grasshopper, and CAD exchange through common import and export formats used in fabrication planning. It supports downstream detailing through drawing layouts, dimensioning, and annotation tools that fit shop documentation needs. Rhino also acts as a customization hub through scripting and plugin-based extensions for glass-specific automation.
Pros
- NURBS modeling handles complex curves and custom glass shapes reliably
- Grasshopper enables automated, parameter-driven cutting and layout logic
- Drawing layouts support detailed shop documentation with dimensions and annotations
- Extensive plugin ecosystem supports automation for fabrication workflows
Cons
- Native tools do not provide full end-to-end glass estimating and dispatch out of the box
- Modeling requires CAD skill to produce clean fabrication-ready outputs
- Interoperability depends on correct setup of layers, tolerances, and export settings
Best For
Teams needing advanced geometry modeling and automation without rigid presets
Fusion 360
CAD/CAMIntegrated CAD and CAM used to model glass-related components and generate manufacturing documentation from parametric designs.
Parametric timeline and constraints for automatically updating glazing layouts and shop drawings
Fusion 360 stands out for combining parametric CAD modeling with CAM, simulation, and assembly workflows in one design environment. It supports sketch-based geometry and robust solid modeling suitable for glass panel, frame, and mullion detailing that can be updated across revisions. Drawings, nesting-oriented manufacturing exports, and toolpath generation help connect design intent to fabrication steps. The broader Autodesk ecosystem also enables collaboration and data management through connected projects and file-sharing options.
Pros
- Parametric modeling supports glass and frame revisions without rebuilding drawings
- Integrated CAM toolpaths for edge processing and related fabrication steps
- Assemblies and drawings keep mullions, spacings, and dimensions consistent
- Cloud collaboration supports version control and shared project review
- Simulation tools help catch design and motion issues before manufacturing
Cons
- Glass-specific fabrication workflows require setup of custom processes
- CAM output can demand careful configuration for realistic shop routing
- Steep learning curve for users focused only on glazing layout
- Large assemblies can slow down during constraint-heavy edits
Best For
Glazing fabrication teams needing parametric CAD with integrated CAM and drawings
Conclusion
After evaluating 8 manufacturing engineering, AutoCAD stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Glass Fabrication Software
This buyer’s guide helps teams pick glass fabrication software by mapping workflow needs to tools like AutoCAD, Revit, Siemens NX, CATIA, Tekla Structures, SketchUp, Rhino, and Fusion 360. It also covers geometry-first options like Rhino and NX for complex curves and CAD-to-CAM continuity. The guide explains which capabilities matter most for shop-ready drawings, geometry change management, and fabrication-aligned outputs.
What Is Glass Fabrication Software?
Glass fabrication software supports design-to-fabrication workflows for glass panels, mullions, curtain wall components, and glazing assemblies. It solves problems like keeping geometry consistent across revisions, producing fabrication-ready 2D documentation, and coordinating component data between design and manufacturing. Tools like AutoCAD focus on DWG-based shop drawings with reusable blocks and layer standards. Tools like Revit focus on BIM families and parameters for curtain wall and glazing schedules that stay linked to model geometry.
Key Features to Look For
The right feature set prevents rework by keeping geometry, documentation, and fabrication outputs aligned from model through shop drawings.
DWG-based shop drawing control with reusable blocks, layers, and templates
AutoCAD excels at producing detailed fabrication drawings using a DWG-native workflow with strong layer management for consistent annotation. Blocks and templates in AutoCAD speed repeatable framing and glazing drawing sets, which reduces manual redrawing.
Parameter-driven glazing and curtain wall schedules from a model
Revit provides curtain wall and glazing system families where BIM parameters drive component schedules. This reduces mismatches between model geometry and schedule outputs because schedules update from the same underlying families.
CAD-to-CAM continuity with associative parametric modeling
Siemens NX supports parametric design that remains associative and carries geometry into associative drawings and downstream manufacturing documentation. This CAD-to-CAM connectivity supports geometry-driven manufacturing outputs suited to engineering-led glass fabrication teams.
Advanced NURBS and curve handling for complex glass surfaces
Rhino’s NURBS modeling supports complex curved glass geometries with reliable surface and solid edits. Rhino’s approach reduces fragile geometry workflows for custom shapes when the shop needs fabrication-friendly surfaces rather than rigid glazing presets.
BIM-first coordination and fabrication-oriented part data output
Tekla Structures supports parametric component modeling that helps maintain exact glass geometry and constraint-driven detailing. BIM-driven drawings and part data reduce manual takeoff and rework when glass units must match frames, anchors, and interfaces.
Parametric timeline and constraints for automatically updating drawings
Fusion 360 uses a parametric timeline and constraints so glazing layouts and shop drawings update with design changes. This reduces rebuild effort because drawings and assemblies stay consistent with mullions, spacings, and dimensions.
How to Choose the Right Glass Fabrication Software
Selection should start with the required output format and change-management style, then match those needs to the specific strengths of each tool.
Start with the shop output requirement
If production depends on DWG shop drawings, AutoCAD fits best because it is DWG-native and built for dimensioned details with layer-driven standards. If schedules and elevations must come from a model-driven system, Revit fits best because curtain wall and glazing families drive parameter-based component schedules.
Choose geometry authority based on your glass complexity
If the geometry includes complex curves and custom glass shapes, Rhino provides NURBS modeling plus Grasshopper automation to generate fabrication-ready geometry from design inputs. If the work is engineering-led with deep geometry control and tolerance-aware manufacturing documentation, Siemens NX supports high-fidelity parametric modeling with CAD-to-CAM continuity.
Match change management to how revisions flow through the business
For revision workflows where drawings must update from design intent, Fusion 360’s parametric timeline and constraints help keep glazing layouts and shop drawings consistent. For revision workflows centered on BIM families and parameters, Revit’s model-linked sheets and schedule generation support coordinated changes across disciplines.
Plan for the right modeling workflow discipline
CAD governance matters with AutoCAD because reusable blocks, templates, and annotation standards require ongoing process control to stay consistent. BIM and family setup matters with Revit and Tekla Structures because custom mullion, panel, and component logic must be modeled correctly to produce reliable schedules and part data.
Validate manufacturing alignment before standardizing production
Run a test workflow end to end from geometry to documentation in Siemens NX when manufacturing needs geometry-driven outputs and NC-ready processes. Validate documentation mapping in CATIA and CAD-to-shop formats in Rhino, since advanced workflows often require additional mapping from CAD outputs to fabrication formats.
Who Needs Glass Fabrication Software?
Different glass fabrication environments need different software strengths based on whether the job centers on shop drawing precision, BIM coordination, curve-driven geometry, or CAD-to-CAM manufacturing continuity.
Glazing teams that require DWG-based shop drawings and precise 2D documentation
AutoCAD is the best match for teams that generate glass cutting layouts, elevations, and fabrication drawings using DWG-based workflows. AutoCAD’s blocks, templates, and layer management support consistent shop documentation when teams maintain CAD standards.
Teams standardizing curtain wall and glazing BIM with parameter-driven schedules
Revit fits teams that need model-driven curtain wall and glazing systems where BIM families generate coordinated elevations and component schedules. The same model can reduce rework caused by mismatched documentation between design and fabrication.
Engineering-led glass fabrication teams needing CAD-to-CAM continuity and verification-ready documentation
Siemens NX is built for CAD-to-CAM workflows where associative parametric modeling carries geometry into downstream manufacturing documentation. NX also supports engineering-grade verification workflows for accuracy at fabrication tolerances.
Glass contractors needing fast 3D layouts and presentation drawings for approvals and coordination
SketchUp supports rapid concept and layout modeling using push-pull workflows with 3D visualization for customer approvals and on-site coordination. SketchUp also offers dimensioned sections and view exports for practical drafting deliverables.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The most costly pitfalls come from picking a tool that is strong in one area while leaving core fabrication needs to manual work.
Treating general CAD as a drop-in replacement for glazing-specific workflows
AutoCAD and Rhino can produce shop-ready documentation, but they do not provide full end-to-end glass estimating and dispatch out of the box. Siemens NX reduces CAD-to-manufacturing mismatches by staying in an integrated CAD-to-CAM environment, while Rhino often needs careful setup of layers, tolerances, and export settings to produce consistent fabrication-ready outputs.
Underinvesting in BIM family and modeling standards
Revit and Tekla Structures require disciplined family and component modeling so parameter-driven schedules and part data stay reliable. Without standardization, setup time for families and component logic can slow early iterations and create inconsistent outputs.
Expecting turnkey nesting and cut optimization without an add-on workflow
Revit requires add-ons for fabrication-specific nesting and cut optimization, so teams should plan the optimization process separately if production depends on cut planning. Fusion 360 provides CAM toolpaths, but realistic shop routing still demands careful configuration for the desired edge processing and toolpath behavior.
Choosing a tool that is strong in geometry but weak in fabrication outputs
Rhino offers NURBS modeling and Grasshopper parametric automation, but native tools do not provide full end-to-end glass estimating and dispatch out of the box. SketchUp speeds layouts and visualization, but cut lists and fabrication tolerances still require add-ons or custom scripting to reach fabrication-ready completeness.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features carry a weight of 0.4, ease of use carries a weight of 0.3, and value carries a weight of 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. AutoCAD separated itself with strong features for DWG-native shop drawing control through reusable blocks, templates, and layer management, which directly improves production documentation quality and reduces manual rework for teams that standardize CAD drafting.
Frequently Asked Questions About Glass Fabrication Software
Which software best converts glazing designs into production-ready drawings with controlled geometry?
AutoCAD fits teams that need tight control over geometry, layers, and DWG-based shop documentation. It supports reusable blocks and consistent drawing templates for cut lists, elevations, and installation drawings.
What tool is most effective for model-driven glazing detailing and coordinated schedules?
Revit supports a model-first BIM workflow where curtain wall and glazing elements become parameter-driven component schedules. Model-linked sheets keep elevations and drawings coordinated with the same underlying glazing families.
Which option connects detailed CAD geometry to CNC-ready CAM outputs for glass fabrication?
Siemens NX supports CAD-to-CAM continuity by carrying associative geometry into manufacturing workflows. Its parametric modeling and process-aware capabilities help generate verification-ready documentation that aligns with downstream toolpaths.
When should engineering teams choose CATIA over lighter CAD tools for complex glass shapes?
CATIA suits glazing teams that require robust parametric surface modeling and strong change propagation across assemblies. It becomes more valuable when fabrication outputs map cleanly to CATIA’s structured design-to-manufacturing data flow.
Which software is strongest for fabrication-ready part data generated from BIM component models?
Tekla Structures is a BIM-first choice that generates detailed fabrication geometry with component-based modeling. It can produce drawings and part data while supporting coordination workflows through model sharing.
What software works best for fast 3D glazing layouts and client-ready presentations?
SketchUp accelerates early-stage glazing layout work using push-pull solid modeling and large component libraries. It also supports importing CAD models and producing scaled 3D presentations and section views for review.
Which tool is ideal for NURBS-based freeform geometry and parametric automation of glass surfaces?
Rhino supports direct editing of complex glass geometries in a NURBS environment. Grasshopper adds parameterization so fabrication planning can generate and update geometry from design inputs.
How does Fusion 360 support revision-driven updates across glazing design, drawings, and manufacturing steps?
Fusion 360 uses a parametric timeline so panel, frame, and mullion detailing can update across revisions. It also ties design to drawings and manufacturing exports by generating drawings and toolpaths from the same model.
What common workflow issue causes downstream cut list or shop drawing mismatches across tools, and how do these platforms help?
Mismatches often occur when geometry changes are not tied to a shared model or controlled drawing logic. Revit and Tekla Structures reduce this risk through model-driven schedules and part data, while AutoCAD improves consistency through DWG layer discipline and reusable blocks.
Which software combination fits teams that need both glazing-specific detailing and deeper engineering or manufacturing verification?
Siemens NX pairs detailed parametric modeling with CAM and associative drawings for manufacturing verification. CATIA offers stronger parametric change management for complex assemblies, while Rhino and Fusion 360 can speed up geometry iteration when automation and updates are required.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Manufacturing Engineering alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of manufacturing engineering tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare manufacturing engineering tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.