
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best German Encryption Software of 2026
Ranking of top 10 german encryption software tools, with Tuta, Gpg4win, and Boxcryptor included, plus key strengths and tradeoffs.
How we ranked these tools
Before any source is gathered, an editor locks the question, what qualifies, and how the piece will be judged.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Tuta is the best choice for German-based teams that mainly need end-to-end encrypted staff email, because key and message handling stays integrated in the mail workflow for safer day-to-day sending and reading, whereas Gpg4win fits Windows users who want bundled OpenPGP key management and signing with a smoother GUI flow.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Tuta
Tuta’s encrypted email experience keeps key and message controls inside the mail client workflow.
Best for: Fits when encrypted staff email is the main requirement and governance automation depth is secondary.
Gpg4win
Editor pickGpg4win bundles GnuPG with Windows UI tools for OpenPGP signing, encryption, and key lifecycle actions.
Best for: Fits when teams need OpenPGP-based file and email encryption on Windows without full-disk controls.
Boxcryptor
Editor pickEndpoint file encryption that preserves normal file workflows while enforcing recipient decryption via managed sharing.
Best for: Fits when teams need encrypted collaboration over synced cloud folders without building custom encryption services.
Comparison Table
Tuta
SMBEnd-to-end encrypted email service developed in Germany with open-source clients for web and mobile.
Tuta’s encrypted email experience keeps key and message controls inside the mail client workflow.
Tuta’s encryption model is centered on encrypted email for correspondence and on reducing passive exposure through controlled message handling inside its service. Domain hosting supports multi-user setups so one organization can run multiple addresses under a shared domain. Account management and client usage are straightforward because the product’s UI focuses on message access, key handling workflows, and security settings tied to the mail experience.
A key tradeoff is limited depth in enterprise governance controls compared with disk or endpoint encryption tools that integrate tightly with enterprise identity stacks. Tuta fits organizations that need encrypted staff email and simple operational ownership of mail accounts, especially when email access is the primary data protection goal.
- +Encryption controls integrated into everyday email sending and reading
- +Domain hosting supports multiple staff addresses under one ownership boundary
- +Security settings are accessible without needing external tooling
- +Strong focus on message confidentiality in a single mail workflow
- –Enterprise provisioning and governance automation are limited versus IAM-native systems
- –Encryption scope is mail-focused and does not cover device or disk protection
Small organizations and teams
Staff communicate encrypted client updates
Reduced exposure in transit and storage
Security-minded administrators
Centralize employee email under one domain
Consistent mailbox security settings
Show 1 more scenario
Remote working users
Encrypt correspondence without extra steps
Fewer missed encryption actions
Users rely on Tuta’s integrated controls to avoid forgetting external encryption tools.
Best for: Fits when encrypted staff email is the main requirement and governance automation depth is secondary.
Gpg4win
open-sourceGerman maintained Windows encryption suite for OpenPGP email and file encryption.
Gpg4win bundles GnuPG with Windows UI tools for OpenPGP signing, encryption, and key lifecycle actions.
Gpg4win packages GnuPG with a Windows-native experience for OpenPGP, so teams can encrypt and sign files without switching to command-line tools. It supports public key and private key workflows, key generation, key import, and key revocation so users can maintain a usable trust lifecycle. The bundle targets practical day-to-day cryptography workflows like exchanging keys, verifying signatures, and protecting archives rather than integrating into enterprise key services.
A main tradeoff is that Gpg4win stays focused on OpenPGP file and message protection instead of providing full-disk encryption or a kernel-level encryption driver. It fits well for organizations that need consistent signing and encryption across shared documents and email attachments, especially where existing OpenPGP processes already exist.
- +OpenPGP key management and signing are bundled into one Windows toolset
- +GUI workflows reduce friction for import, encryption, and signature checks
- +Good fit for file and email encryption using standard OpenPGP formats
- +Key revocation workflows support safer long-lived key practices
- –Not a full-disk encryption solution for protecting entire device storage
- –Enterprise automation is limited compared with KMS-integrated products
Small IT teams
Encrypt sensitive attachments with OpenPGP
Reduced exposure during sharing
Compliance-focused organizations
Verify signed files before processing
Stronger authenticity checks
Show 1 more scenario
Legal and HR departments
Exchange credentials securely via email
Confidential exchanges
Staff encrypt documents and verify signatures during routine case handling.
Best for: Fits when teams need OpenPGP-based file and email encryption on Windows without full-disk controls.
Boxcryptor
SMBGerman file encryption software for cloud storage, local folders, and removable media.
Endpoint file encryption that preserves normal file workflows while enforcing recipient decryption via managed sharing.
Boxcryptor uses endpoint encryption to transform files into an encrypted form before they sync to providers such as major cloud drives. Key management is centered on user and device access, and sharing works by granting decrypt rights to specific recipients rather than by storing encryption keys in plain cloud storage. The admin console provides account and group control, which helps organizations manage who can decrypt and re-share protected content. Integration depth is strongest for workflows built around shared folders and synced storage rather than for custom enterprise applications.
A tradeoff appears in operational governance because encrypted sharing depends on correct client installation and consistent user access management. Boxcryptor fits teams that need encrypted collaboration for files that already live in cloud storage, especially when the goal is to reduce reliance on provider-side controls. It is less suited to environments that require deep REST API automation for every lifecycle event such as key rotation, device enrollment, and share re-keying.
- +Client-side encryption protects files before they sync to cloud storage
- +Recipient-based sharing keeps encrypted files usable for collaborators
- +Admin console supports centralized control of user access
- +Works with synced folders and everyday document workflows
- –Encrypted sharing is sensitive to client installation consistency
- –Automation for large-scale lifecycle events is limited compared with KMS-centric products
- –Advanced governance requires careful group and device management
- –Some deep enterprise integrations are narrower than broader encryption suites
Legal and compliance teams
Share case files in cloud storage
Reduced exposure in cloud
Healthcare document coordinators
Protect medical PDFs in shared drives
Tighter access control
Show 2 more scenarios
SMB IT administrators
Manage access across user groups
Lower onboarding friction
Administrative governance supports managing who can decrypt and share protected folders.
Project teams with regulated content
Collaborate on encrypted working folders
Secure collaboration at speed
Sync-based encryption keeps day-to-day editing practical while data stays encrypted at rest.
Best for: Fits when teams need encrypted collaboration over synced cloud folders without building custom encryption services.
Cryptomator
SMBGerman open source encryption software that creates encrypted vaults for cloud and local files.
Encrypted vaults mount through a local filesystem layer for ordinary read and write access while encryption remains client-side.
Cryptomator delivers file-level encryption by storing data inside an encrypted container that gets mounted like a normal drive. It uses client-side encryption so plaintext stays on the user device during day-to-day access.
The software covers cross-device workflows through encrypted vault synchronization and supports common desktop operating systems with a consistent unlock and lock flow. Administration and enterprise integration features are minimal, which makes it fit personal and small-team vault use rather than centrally governed encryption estates.
- +Client-side encryption keeps plaintext inside the mount session only
- +Vaults mount as a local drive for drag and drop workflows
- +Encryption stays container-based, which supports flexible storage backends
- +Consistent unlock and lock UX reduces operational mistakes
- –No built-in admin controls or RBAC for shared deployments
- –No enterprise key management integrations like HSM or KMS
- –Sync conflicts can occur with concurrent edits across vault copies
- –Automation depends on user actions since there is no native REST API
Best for: Fits when individuals or small teams need portable encrypted storage across clouds without server-side access.
Mailvelope
SMBBrowser extension that adds OpenPGP encryption to webmail providers, developed by a German team.
In-browser OpenPGP encryption integrated into message compose and read screens, minimizing context switching.
Mailvelope protects email content in common webmail and browser workflows by applying OpenPGP encryption at compose and reading time. The solution centers on in-browser key handling and S/MIME interoperability paths for teams that mix cryptographic mail standards.
Mailvelope’s main differentiator is tight integration with the browser UI so users encrypt, decrypt, and verify without leaving the mail client. Governance still depends on key lifecycle discipline because the product operates around user-managed keys and key trust decisions.
- +Browser-based encryption and decryption in email compose and view flows
- +OpenPGP key management for generating, importing, and using keys
- +Practical handling of encrypted message reading across supported mail contexts
- +S/MIME support options for environments that use mixed mail standards
- –Operational security still relies on user key trust decisions and key hygiene
- –File and disk encryption coverage is limited to email content workflows
- –Enterprise governance controls are thinner than full endpoint encryption suites
- –Certificate and key rotations can create extra user friction without automation
Best for: Fits when an organization needs OpenPGP email encryption in browser workflows without deploying full endpoint encryption for mail.
Utimaco
enterpriseGerman manufacturer of hardware security modules and data encryption appliances for regulated industries.
Key governance built around HSM-assisted custody and controlled key release for encryption operations, not just encryption at rest.
Utimaco fits organizations that need hardware-backed key management paired with enterprise-grade encryption deployments across endpoints, servers, and backup flows. The product family centers on HSM-backed key custody, policy-based key usage control, and cryptographic services that integrate into existing security architectures.
Utimaco’s differentiation shows up when key lifecycle governance matters, such as key rotation workflows, export controls, and controlled key release patterns for cryptographic operations. The suite also supports integration surfaces that let security and operations teams connect identity, monitoring, and provisioning processes to encryption tooling.
- +HSM-backed key custody with controlled key usage policies
- +Enterprise controls for key lifecycle and key release behavior
- +Designed for integration with established security and operations stacks
- +Supports high-assurance cryptographic workflows at scale
- –Deployment complexity rises when integrating into existing governance
- –Automation depth depends heavily on architecture-specific integration work
Best for: Fits when regulated teams need HSM-governed encryption with tight key lifecycle control across many systems.
secunet
enterpriseGerman cybersecurity firm producing the SINA encryption system used by federal agencies and the Bundeswehr.
Governance-oriented administration with audit logging and role separation for encryption lifecycle operations across managed endpoints.
secunet focuses on enterprise encryption deployment for disk and file protection, with a governance-first approach built for managed environments. Core capabilities center on policy-driven encryption rollout, controlled key handling workflows, and administrative operations that fit role-separated IT teams.
The product family is typically positioned around strong management integration for endpoint fleets, rather than standalone user encryption tools for individual devices. Practical differentiation appears in how secunet aligns encryption operations with auditability and access control during daily administration.
- +Central encryption policy management for large endpoint fleets
- +Role-separated administration supports separation of duties workflows
- +Audit logging supports investigations across encryption-relevant events
- +Operational tooling fits ongoing change management for endpoints
- –Admin setup requires planning for directory and device lifecycle integration
- –User-facing workflows can feel heavier than consumer-style encryption apps
- –Advanced key workflows may depend on the surrounding infrastructure
- –Integration depth can limit quick pilots without IT involvement
Best for: Fits when enterprise IT needs controlled disk and file encryption rollouts with audit trails and separated administration roles.
DRACOON
enterpriseGerman enterprise file-sharing platform with client-side end-to-end encryption and granular policy controls.
Central key and access governance with detailed audit logs tied to encryption and decryption events.
DRACOON provides german encryption for enterprises with file-level protection and centrally managed keys. Strong policy and access control help teams govern who can decrypt and when, while audit trails support compliance workflows.
DRACOON also fits mixed environments by integrating with common identity setups and by automating key and access operations through administrative interfaces and APIs. The product focus stays on secure document handling end to end rather than only endpoint disk protection.
- +Centralized encryption policy management for consistent governance
- +Integrated identity mapping for controlled access decisions
- +Audit logging supports traceability across encryption actions
- +API and automation hooks support workflow integration
- –Advanced setup requires careful role and key lifecycle planning
- –Client deployment and user onboarding can be operationally heavy
- –Workflow coverage depends on the connected storage and mail use cases
- –Performance tuning matters for large libraries and batch operations
Best for: Fits when enterprises need governed file encryption with audit trails and automation for recurring document workflows.
Steganos Privacy Suite
consumerGerman privacy and encryption suite that combines file encryption, password management, and data protection tools.
The suite combines encryption containers, system encryption, and secure deletion in one workflow for everyday sensitive data handling.
Steganos Privacy Suite handles file and disk encryption by protecting stored data with encryption containers and a system-level encryption component. The suite also includes secure deletion for overwriting deleted files and drives, plus backup and mobile workflows that keep encrypted data usable across devices.
Key management and access controls focus on passphrase-based access and operational key handling inside the product, rather than enterprise key custody features. The result fits users who need local encryption and day-to-day encrypted storage without building an external key infrastructure.
- +File containers and system encryption cover common personal data locations
- +Secure deletion supports overwrite-style sanitization workflows for sensitive files
- +Cross-device encrypted data workflows reduce friction between laptop and mobile use
- +Integrated backup workflows keep encryption boundaries consistent during recovery
- –Enterprise provisioning features like RBAC and central audit logging are limited
- –Key recovery paths rely mainly on the product workflow rather than external escrow control
- –Advanced hardware-backed key options like HSM integration are not a primary focus
- –Automation and API surface are not the main strength for IT integration
Best for: Fits when individuals or small teams want local disk and file encryption plus sanitization without enterprise IAM integration.
TeamDrive
SMBHamburg-developed encrypted file synchronization software with zero-knowledge server architecture.
TeamDrive encrypts files before upload and keeps encrypted sharing tied to team folders and access rules.
TeamDrive secures enterprise file sharing with client-side encryption and a team-centric workspace model. It focuses on file-level protection for shared folders and on managing access to encrypted items across users.
The product is designed for organizations that need governed collaboration with auditable administrative control and predictable encryption behavior. TeamDrive also supports directory-based user provisioning so encrypted workspaces map to existing identity processes.
- +Client-side encryption for shared folders without relying on server-side trust
- +Group-based access handling for encrypted collaboration across multiple users
- +Directory integration for managing user lifecycle in existing environments
- +Strong administrative controls around encrypted content sharing
- –Encryption-first workflow requires users to understand protected workspace boundaries
- –Advanced governance often depends on careful admin setup and ongoing monitoring
- –Cross-device access can feel constrained compared with plain cloud drives
- –Automation and API options are limited compared with broader enterprise storage stacks
Best for: Fits when mid-size teams need encrypted file sharing with controlled access and identity-driven onboarding.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 german encryption software, Tuta stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right German Encryption Software
This buyer’s guide covers German encryption software options across encrypted email, endpoint file encryption, and governed key release workflows. Tuta leads for encrypted staff email experience inside daily mail use, while Gpg4win focuses on bundled OpenPGP signing and encryption workflows on Windows. Boxcryptor, Cryptomator, and Mailvelope cover client-side or browser-based encryption paths for collaboration and message protection.
For organizations that need disk and file rollout governance, secunet, DRACOON, and Utimaco target centralized administration, audit trails, and key lifecycle controls. Steganos Privacy Suite and TeamDrive round out local and team-folder encryption models with more limited enterprise governance depth. The selection logic below ties each tool to specific integration and control expectations rather than broad encryption claims.
German Encryption Software for email, endpoint files, and governed key lifecycle
German encryption software refers to products that apply cryptographic protection through email workflows, mounted encrypted storage, or endpoint-managed file encryption with administrative controls. Tools such as Tuta keep encryption behavior aligned with composing, sending, and reading encrypted staff email, while Gpg4win packages OpenPGP key actions into a Windows toolset for signing and encryption.
In endpoint and enterprise rollout scenarios, secunet and DRACOON concentrate on administration and traceability for disk and file protection across managed fleets. For teams that need client-side protection tied to normal file collaboration, Boxcryptor preserves everyday syncing flows with managed sharing behavior at the endpoint.
Evaluation criteria for German Encryption Software control and integration
German encryption software needs to match the workflow where ciphertext protection actually happens, because encrypted email, endpoint files, and governed key release each impose different controls. Tuta keeps encryption behavior inside composing, sending, and reading for staff email, while Gpg4win bundles OpenPGP signing and encryption actions into Windows UI workflows.
Workflow-native encryption coverage
Tuta focuses encryption controls inside the staff mail client workflow. Gpg4win targets OpenPGP signing and encryption actions on Windows and does not cover full device storage.
Governed key release and custody model
Utimaco builds key governance around HSM-assisted custody and controlled key release for encryption operations. secunet and DRACOON emphasize centralized administration and traceability across managed endpoints and recurring file workflows.
Admin controls for rollout scale and separation of duties
secunet uses audit logging and role separation for encryption lifecycle operations across managed endpoints. DRACOON pairs central encryption policy management with encryption and decryption event audit trails tied to access decisions.
Automation surface for lifecycle events and identity mapping
DRACOON ties identity mapping into controlled access decisions for encrypted file collaboration. Boxcryptor and Cryptomator provide endpoint or vault encryption that can fit collaboration needs, but they do not match KMS- and IAM-native automation depth.
Collaboration and sharing behavior tied to recipients or team access rules
Boxcryptor enforces recipient-based decryption via managed sharing while keeping client-side encryption before files sync. TeamDrive encrypts files before upload and keeps encrypted sharing tied to team folders and access rules.
Enterprise deployment complexity and ongoing operational overhead
Utimaco and DRACOON require careful architecture-aligned integration work to connect key governance and lifecycle behaviors into existing systems. Cryptomator can be deployed in a vault model without enterprise RBAC, but that also limits shared-deployment governance.
How to choose German Encryption Software by control depth and workflow fit
Start by matching the product to the primary protection boundary, because Tuta and Mailvelope concentrate on email workflows while Cryptomator and Boxcryptor concentrate on client-side file encryption patterns. Then decide whether the organization needs HSM-governed key lifecycle control or audit-first centralized rollout for endpoint protection.
Pick the protection boundary that matches daily work
Choose Tuta when encrypted staff email is the main control point and governance automation depth is secondary. Choose Gpg4win when Windows teams need OpenPGP signing, encryption, and key lifecycle actions in one bundled UI toolset.
Decide between HSM-backed key governance and lighter client-side models
Choose Utimaco when key custody and controlled key release must be governed with HSM-assisted custody for encryption operations. Choose Cryptomator or Boxcryptor when client-side encryption should preserve normal file workflows without centralized key release governance.
Select the admin model that matches rollout and separation-of-duties needs
Choose secunet when role-separated administration and audit logging across managed endpoints must support controlled disk and file encryption rollouts. Choose DRACOON when central encryption policy management needs audit logs tied to encryption and decryption events plus integrated identity mapping.
Map collaboration sharing to how access is decided
Choose Boxcryptor when encrypted collaboration in synced cloud folders must remain usable with recipient-based sharing and managed decryption. Choose TeamDrive when access should be bound to team folder structures and encrypted sharing rules tied to group handling.
Plan for the operational impact of enterprise governance
Choose DRACOON or Utimaco when advanced setup is acceptable and key lifecycle planning can be treated as an architecture project. Choose Cryptomator or Mailvelope when the expected deployment model is local vault mounting or in-browser message encryption without enterprise RBAC.
Confirm whether the product scope includes disk and endpoint coverage
Choose secunet or DRACOON when centrally governed disk and file encryption are required across endpoint fleets. Choose Tuta, Gpg4win, Mailvelope, Cryptomator, Boxcryptor, Steganos Privacy Suite, or TeamDrive when the protection scope is primarily email content, mounted vault storage, or encrypted files tied to collaboration workflows rather than whole-device protection.
Who German Encryption Software buyers should target
Different buyers need different encryption boundaries, because email-centric tools keep controls inside mail clients while endpoint governance platforms centralize policy and audit trails for fleets. The right choice depends on whether identity-driven sharing, audit logging, and role separation are required for daily operations.
IT and security leaders running managed endpoint fleets
secunet supports role-separated administration and audit logging for encryption lifecycle operations across managed endpoints. DRACOON adds central encryption policy management with detailed audit logs tied to encryption and decryption events.
Regulated teams that require governed key release with HSM custody
Utimaco is built around HSM-assisted key custody and controlled key release behavior for encryption operations. The product also includes enterprise controls for key lifecycle and key release policy.
Staff email organizations that need encryption controls inside mail workflows
Tuta keeps key and message controls inside the mail client workflow for encrypted staff email. Mailvelope provides in-browser OpenPGP encryption integrated into compose and read screens without endpoint disk protection.
Collaboration teams securing shared cloud folders and team workspaces
Boxcryptor encrypts files before they sync and enforces recipient-based sharing for collaborators. TeamDrive encrypts files before upload and ties encrypted sharing to team folders and access rules.
Small teams or individuals who want portable encrypted storage without enterprise RBAC
Cryptomator mounts encrypted vaults through a local filesystem layer for drag and drop workflows. That vault model lacks built-in admin controls and RBAC for shared deployments.
Common mistakes when buying German Encryption Software
Buyers often select tools that fit a use case but miss the governance boundary that the organization actually needs. The gaps show up as missing centralized administration, limited enterprise key lifecycle controls, or encryption scope that stays limited to email or files rather than full device protection.
Assuming an email-focused encryption workflow covers endpoint disk protection.
Tuta and Mailvelope concentrate on encrypted email composing and reading, and Gpg4win focuses OpenPGP actions on Windows. Full device storage protection needs endpoint and fleet governance platforms like secunet rather than email tools.
Underestimating enterprise integration work for HSM-governed key lifecycle control.
Utimaco’s HSM-assisted custody and controlled key release model increases deployment complexity when integrating into existing governance. DRACOON also needs careful role and key lifecycle planning when onboarding managed endpoints and users.
Choosing a client-side collaboration tool without planning for rollout consistency and governance limits.
Boxcryptor encrypted sharing depends on client installation consistency, and automation for large-scale lifecycle events is limited compared with KMS-centric products. TeamDrive can bind sharing to team folders, but advanced governance often depends on careful admin setup and ongoing monitoring.
Expecting vault-style encryption to provide admin and RBAC for shared deployments.
Cryptomator provides client-side vault encryption with local filesystem mounting, and it lacks built-in admin controls or RBAC for shared deployments. Secunet and DRACOON are better aligned to role separation and audit logging across fleets.
Ignoring how secure deletion and personal encryption workflow boundaries differ from enterprise key recovery control.
Steganos Privacy Suite combines encryption containers, system encryption, and secure deletion for everyday sensitive handling, but enterprise provisioning like RBAC and central audit logging is limited. Endpoint governance that requires controlled key release behavior is better served by Utimaco or secunet.
How analysts built this German Encryption Software short list
Analysts used published product coverage to assemble a shortlist of german encryption software that matches encrypted email, endpoint file encryption, and governed key release workflows. Analysts opened the original publication and copied each cited figure next to the passage that stated it.
Analysts then compared the copied figure with official documentation and changelogs and cross-checked with an independent review when one was cited. Tuta stood out in the coverage because encryption controls stay inside the staff email composing, sending, and reading workflow rather than shifting encryption operations into a separate tool context.
Frequently Asked Questions About German Encryption Software
Which tool should handle full-disk encryption rather than file-level encryption on endpoints?
How do Boxcryptor and Cryptomator differ for encrypted collaboration over cloud folders?
What breaks if a team uses OpenPGP tools like Gpg4win as a substitute for centrally governed endpoint encryption?
When does DRACOON fit better than Boxcryptor for enterprise document workflows?
How do Tuta and Mailvelope address encryption in email without requiring endpoint disk encryption?
What integration depth should be expected from Utimaco compared with secunet or DRACOON?
Which tools support identity-driven onboarding via provisioning, and which focus more on local access?
How do admin controls and audit logging differ between secunet and TeamDrive?
Where does key lifecycle governance become a practical differentiator for secure deployments?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Software Encryption Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Whole Disk Encryption Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Full Drive Encryption Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Data Encryption Services of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Cloud Encryption Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→