
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Electronic Validation Software of 2026
Discover the top 10 best electronic validation software solutions to streamline compliance.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ValiMail
Deliverability-oriented email validation that flags risky addresses beyond format checking
Built for teams validating email lists to improve deliverability without heavy integration work.
NeverBounce
Real-time and bulk email validation with deliverable and undeliverable result states
Built for teams reducing bounce rates with automated email list validation and suppression.
Kickbox
Real-time email validation with deliverability-focused status signals
Built for teams validating email contacts and cleaning lists using an API.
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates electronic validation software for verifying email deliverability, cleaning contact data, and reducing bounce rates. It covers leading tools such as ValiMail, NeverBounce, Kickbox, Mailgun Email Validation, and Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation, alongside other options included in the shortlist.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ValiMail Validates email addresses by checking deliverability signals and performs quality checks to reduce bounces. | email validation | 8.5/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.3/10 | 8.5/10 |
| 2 | NeverBounce Validates email addresses through deliverability testing and returns verification status for lists and APIs. | email validation | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 3 | Kickbox Verifies email addresses using deliverability intelligence and provides results via dashboard and API. | email validation | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.7/10 |
| 4 | Mailgun Email Validation Validates email addresses to reduce bounces by running checks before sending through Mailgun features and APIs. | deliverability checks | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 5 | Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation Uses AWS email validation capabilities to improve deliverability and reduce bounce rates for sending workloads. | enterprise email validation | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 6 | Hallerby Email Verifier Checks email addresses for validity and deliverability characteristics for list hygiene workflows. | list hygiene | 7.3/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 7 | Spokeo Email Validator Provides email verification and list-quality tooling to support data cleaning and reduced sending failures. | data quality | 7.4/10 | 7.1/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.1/10 |
| 8 | Bouncer Verifies email addresses and returns validation outcomes for user signup and marketing list maintenance. | email validation API | 7.7/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 9 | Snov.io Email Verifier Checks emails for validity and reduces bounce risk by returning verification status for outreach workflows. | prospecting validation | 7.7/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 10 | Hunter Email Verifier Verifies email addresses with validation results to support lead generation and data cleanup. | lead gen validation | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 | 8.1/10 | 6.6/10 |
Validates email addresses by checking deliverability signals and performs quality checks to reduce bounces.
Validates email addresses through deliverability testing and returns verification status for lists and APIs.
Verifies email addresses using deliverability intelligence and provides results via dashboard and API.
Validates email addresses to reduce bounces by running checks before sending through Mailgun features and APIs.
Uses AWS email validation capabilities to improve deliverability and reduce bounce rates for sending workloads.
Checks email addresses for validity and deliverability characteristics for list hygiene workflows.
Provides email verification and list-quality tooling to support data cleaning and reduced sending failures.
Verifies email addresses and returns validation outcomes for user signup and marketing list maintenance.
Checks emails for validity and reduces bounce risk by returning verification status for outreach workflows.
Verifies email addresses with validation results to support lead generation and data cleanup.
ValiMail
email validationValidates email addresses by checking deliverability signals and performs quality checks to reduce bounces.
Deliverability-oriented email validation that flags risky addresses beyond format checking
ValiMail focuses on electronic email validation with real-time deliverability signals that go beyond basic syntax checks. It provides tools to verify lists, reduce bounce risk, and support ongoing list hygiene with automated validation flows. The product is designed for practical workflows that need actionable validation results rather than passive reporting.
Pros
- Strong deliverability-focused validation for reducing bounce and spam risk
- Automation-friendly workflow for continuous list hygiene
- Clear validation outcomes that support downstream email sending decisions
- Works well for cleansing both new uploads and recurring datasets
Cons
- Validation results can require list management to fully realize gains
- Advanced routing and governance controls are limited versus enterprise suites
Best For
Teams validating email lists to improve deliverability without heavy integration work
NeverBounce
email validationValidates email addresses through deliverability testing and returns verification status for lists and APIs.
Real-time and bulk email validation with deliverable and undeliverable result states
NeverBounce focuses on fast email deliverability checks that reduce bounces before messages are sent. The service validates email addresses using verification results such as deliverable, undeliverable, and risk states, which supports list cleanup and compliance workflows. It also includes bulk validation designed for high-volume validation runs and integrates with common CRM and marketing tools for automated pre-send checks.
Pros
- Bulk email validation that flags deliverable, undeliverable, and risky addresses
- API and integrations enable automated pre-send list verification workflows
- Clear validation statuses support downstream filtering and suppression logic
Cons
- Limited visibility into why an address is flagged beyond result categories
- Verification accuracy can vary for low-engagement or newly created addresses
- Best outcomes require maintaining clean ingestion and resend processes
Best For
Teams reducing bounce rates with automated email list validation and suppression
Kickbox
email validationVerifies email addresses using deliverability intelligence and provides results via dashboard and API.
Real-time email validation with deliverability-focused status signals
Kickbox stands out with an accuracy-first approach to validating email addresses and enriching records for marketing and operations workflows. It provides real-time email verification signals that help teams reduce bounce rates and identify invalid inboxes before sending. The service also supports domain-level checks and data quality use cases that fit database hygiene and campaign list cleanup. Validation outputs integrate into typical software stacks for automated screening of new and existing contacts.
Pros
- Fast email validation reduces invalid deliverability before campaign sends
- Enrichment and classification improve downstream segmentation and list cleanup
- API-first design supports automated verification in existing systems
Cons
- Primary focus on email verification leaves gaps for broader account validation
- Domain and inbox signals can still require human review for edge cases
- Limited visibility into why results occur compared with full diagnostic tooling
Best For
Teams validating email contacts and cleaning lists using an API
Mailgun Email Validation
deliverability checksValidates email addresses to reduce bounces by running checks before sending through Mailgun features and APIs.
Real-time email deliverability validation returned per address from the validation API
Mailgun Email Validation focuses on programmatic email address verification with bulk-friendly request patterns and a validation result for each address. It checks common deliverability signals like domain validity, mailbox acceptance checks, and syntax issues so teams can reduce bounced messages. The service fits directly into existing sending or signup workflows through API responses and machine-readable outputs. It is strongest for pre-send and pre-signup validation rather than full inbox content verification.
Pros
- API-driven validation suitable for pre-send and signup verification workflows
- Bulk validation support helps clean large contact lists quickly
- Machine-readable results make automation and routing straightforward
- Domain and mailbox deliverability checks reduce avoidable bounces
Cons
- Verification cannot guarantee future mailbox behavior or inbox delivery
- More advanced checks require careful integration and retry handling
- Separate operational logic is needed to manage validation workflows
Best For
Teams validating signups and outbound recipient lists via API automation
Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation
enterprise email validationUses AWS email validation capabilities to improve deliverability and reduce bounce rates for sending workloads.
Email validation integrated with Pinpoint to improve delivery readiness
Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation focuses on verifying email addresses for delivery readiness inside the Amazon Pinpoint ecosystem. It checks format and domain signals, supports confirmation workflows that reduce bounce risk, and integrates cleanly with Pinpoint journeys and events. It also aligns validation results with Amazon-managed sending analytics for ongoing list hygiene. The solution is best treated as an operational validation step tied to campaign sending rather than a standalone enrichment database.
Pros
- Built for Amazon Pinpoint workflows and delivery-event alignment
- Provides email verification to reduce invalid addresses before sending
- Supports list hygiene practices using verification feedback loops
Cons
- Validation value drops outside Amazon Pinpoint sending pipelines
- Less transparent for deep enrichment compared with broader validation vendors
- Operational setup requires Pinpoint-oriented IAM and configuration work
Best For
Teams using Amazon Pinpoint needing email validation before campaign sends
Hallerby Email Verifier
list hygieneChecks email addresses for validity and deliverability characteristics for list hygiene workflows.
Batch email address verification with deliverability-focused results
Hallerby Email Verifier focuses on fast electronic validation for email addresses with results suitable for list cleanup. It supports both syntax-level checks and deliverability-style validation using network and mail server signals. The tool is built to help reduce bounce risk before sending, while keeping a simple workflow for importing lists and reviewing validation outcomes.
Pros
- Clear validation outcomes that help remove risky addresses before outreach
- Batch processing supports efficient verification of large email lists
- Relatively straightforward interface for importing lists and viewing results
- Useful mix of syntax and deliverability-style checks
Cons
- Deliverability-style accuracy can drop for privacy-blocked or throttled domains
- Limited evidence of advanced segmentation and rule-based workflows
- Fewer options for deep mailbox intelligence compared with enterprise verifiers
Best For
Marketing teams cleaning lists before email campaigns
Spokeo Email Validator
data qualityProvides email verification and list-quality tooling to support data cleaning and reduced sending failures.
Deliverability-focused email validation with decision-ready status results
Spokeo Email Validator focuses on email deliverability checks rather than address-only normalization, making it distinct among contact-cleaning tools. It validates whether an email address is likely deliverable and provides status results that can support list hygiene and workflow decisions. The product fits teams that need rapid pre-send validation to reduce bounced emails and improve outreach reliability. Validation outputs are designed to be actionable for routing or cleaning records inside existing data processes.
Pros
- Delivers actionable deliverability validation results for email list hygiene
- Supports pre-send checks that reduce bounce and spam-risk emails
- Clear outcomes that help clean or block invalid contacts quickly
Cons
- Validation quality can depend on domain behavior and mailbox signals
- Limited workflow depth compared with full email verification platforms
- Fewer advanced integrations for enrichment and matching than broader suites
Best For
Teams validating email lists to cut bounces before outreach workflows
Bouncer
email validation APIVerifies email addresses and returns validation outcomes for user signup and marketing list maintenance.
Risk scoring with deliverability-focused validation outcomes for API and bulk workflows
Bouncer focuses on electronic validation with email deliverability checks, syntax parsing, and risk scoring that helps teams filter bad addresses before outreach. It supports bulk validation workflows designed for high-volume lists and emphasizes fast API-driven checks for automated pipelines. It also provides clear validation outcomes that map to operational actions like suppression or re-verification. The tool is less about inbox monitoring and more about pre-send data quality enforcement for contacts and lead databases.
Pros
- API-first email validation enables automated pre-send filtering
- Risk scoring supports suppression decisions beyond basic syntax checks
- Bulk list processing helps clean large contact datasets quickly
Cons
- Primarily targeted at email validation, not general contact verification
- Operational outcomes depend on list quality and validation cadence strategy
- Less visibility into why specific results occur for every edge case
Best For
Teams validating outbound email lists before campaigns and CRM imports
Snov.io Email Verifier
prospecting validationChecks emails for validity and reduces bounce risk by returning verification status for outreach workflows.
Bulk verification results with deliverability-oriented status labeling for email list hygiene
Snov.io Email Verifier focuses on fast electronic email validation using deliverability-oriented checks beyond simple syntax parsing. It supports bulk verification workflows and returns status results plus metadata useful for lead list hygiene. The tool also provides exporting and integrations that help teams clean contacts before outreach. It targets marketing and sales ops that need repeatable email screening at scale.
Pros
- Bulk email verification with clear deliverability status outputs for list cleaning
- Simple UI for uploading targets and exporting verified results
- Useful metadata assists deduping and suppression workflows
Cons
- Validation accuracy depends on provider reach and target domain behavior
- Less suited for interactive, per-message decisioning without batching
- Limited deep verification controls compared with specialized deliverability testing tools
Best For
Sales and marketing teams cleaning lead lists before email outreach
Hunter Email Verifier
lead gen validationVerifies email addresses with validation results to support lead generation and data cleanup.
Email Verifier with deliverability scoring for valid, invalid, and role-based addresses
Hunter Email Verifier focuses on fast, bulk email address validation using domain and recipient context. It provides risk scoring and classification for deliverability outcomes like valid, invalid, and role-based without requiring an SMTP integration. Users can manage lists, verify addresses at scale, and keep historical hygiene by rechecking as data changes. Its strength is practical email validation for outreach workflows rather than deep mailbox-level verification or full address capture.
Pros
- Bulk email verification with clear deliverability classifications
- Role-based and disposable detection helps reduce outreach waste
- Simple workflows for list uploads and repeated rechecks
- Domain-aware checks improve accuracy versus generic validators
Cons
- Does not confirm mailbox existence with full inbox-level testing
- Automation depends on plan features instead of open API limits
- Score reliability drops when inputs are outdated or malformed
- Limited verification detail for teams needing audit-grade evidence
Best For
Sales and marketing teams validating lead lists before outreach
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 technology digital media, ValiMail stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Electronic Validation Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to select electronic validation software for email address deliverability and list hygiene using tools like ValiMail, NeverBounce, and Kickbox. It also covers API-first options like Mailgun Email Validation and Bouncer, plus ecosystem-tied validation like Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation.
What Is Electronic Validation Software?
Electronic validation software verifies whether electronic contact data is usable for outreach by returning machine-readable validation outcomes. For the email-focused tools in this guide, the software checks deliverability signals beyond basic syntax and flags risky addresses to reduce bounces. Teams use it to clean inbound uploads and recurring contact datasets before sending campaigns or importing leads. Tools like NeverBounce and Mailgun Email Validation deliver per-address validation results designed for automation workflows in outbound systems.
Key Features to Look For
These capabilities determine whether validation results can be operationalized into suppression, routing, and resend decisions.
Deliverability-oriented results beyond syntax checking
ValiMail excels at flagging risky email addresses beyond format checking so teams can reduce bounce and spam risk. NeverBounce, Kickbox, and Spokeo Email Validator also emphasize deliverability-focused status outcomes such as deliverable and undeliverable.
Real-time and bulk validation workflows
NeverBounce provides both real-time and bulk email validation so lists and high-volume runs can be handled in the same operational model. Mailgun Email Validation and Snov.io Email Verifier support bulk-friendly processing with per-address status outputs for list hygiene at scale.
API-driven automation for pre-send and pre-signup enforcement
Mailgun Email Validation is designed for API-driven validation that returns machine-readable results per address for pre-send and pre-signup workflows. Bouncer and Kickbox also support API-first pipelines that enable automated pre-send filtering and continuous verification flows.
Clear validation statuses that map to suppression actions
NeverBounce returns deliverable and undeliverable states that support downstream filtering and suppression logic. Bouncer adds risk scoring that maps validation outcomes to operational actions such as suppression and re-verification.
Enrichment and classification signals for downstream segmentation
Kickbox pairs validation with enrichment and classification signals that improve downstream segmentation and list cleanup. Hunter Email Verifier adds deliverability scoring that distinguishes role-based and disposable patterns to reduce outreach waste.
Ecosystem integration for delivery-event aligned operations
Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation integrates validation steps into Amazon Pinpoint journeys and delivery readiness workflows. This is most useful when validation feedback needs to align with Amazon-managed sending analytics rather than operating as a standalone enrichment database.
How to Choose the Right Electronic Validation Software
A good fit comes from aligning validation outputs and workflow control to the sending and data lifecycle where decisions must be made.
Start with the decision point where validation will be enforced
Choose Mailgun Email Validation when validation must run as a pre-signup or pre-send gate that returns per-address results through an API. Choose ValiMail when the primary goal is list hygiene for reducing bounces with deliverability-oriented flags that support downstream send decisions without heavy routing complexity.
Match your volume and cadence to bulk support and re-verification needs
Select NeverBounce or Snov.io Email Verifier when large list uploads and repeatable batch verification are core requirements for ongoing hygiene. Choose Hunter Email Verifier or Bouncer when repeated rechecks against lead databases are needed to prevent outdated inputs from causing classification drift.
Evaluate the validation outcomes you need for your suppression logic
If suppression rules depend on explicit deliverable and undeliverable outcomes, NeverBounce is built for those result categories. If suppression rules also require risk scoring for finer decisions, Bouncer emphasizes risk scoring mapped to operational actions like suppression and re-verification.
Choose enrichment depth based on whether segmentation depends on classification
If deliverability validation must also support enrichment and classification for segmentation, Kickbox is positioned to improve downstream targeting and list cleanup. If the focus is role-based and disposable detection for reducing outreach waste, Hunter Email Verifier provides deliverability scoring with those classifications.
Confirm the workflow context and ecosystem dependencies
Choose Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation when validation is required inside Amazon Pinpoint campaign workflows and should align with journey execution and delivery-event alignment. Choose Kickbox, Mailgun Email Validation, or NeverBounce when validation must operate across multiple outbound systems rather than being tied to a single sending ecosystem.
Who Needs Electronic Validation Software?
Electronic validation software helps teams protect deliverability and data quality when outreach performance depends on contact usability.
Teams validating email lists to improve deliverability without heavy integration work
ValiMail is a strong match because it focuses on deliverability-oriented email validation that flags risky addresses beyond format checking. Hallerby Email Verifier and Spokeo Email Validator also fit marketing list hygiene needs with batch verification and decision-ready status outputs.
Teams reducing bounce rates with automated pre-send verification and suppression
NeverBounce is designed for automated pre-send list verification workflows with deliverable and undeliverable result states. Bouncer complements this with risk scoring and API-first bulk validation that maps results to suppression and re-verification actions.
Teams validating contacts using API automation inside existing systems
Kickbox is built with an API-first design that returns real-time deliverability-focused status signals and supports automated verification in existing stacks. Mailgun Email Validation is optimized for API-driven validation that fits directly into signup and outbound recipient list flows.
Teams running outreach through Amazon Pinpoint and needing validation aligned to Pinpoint journeys
Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation is the best fit because it integrates validation to improve delivery readiness inside Amazon Pinpoint workflows. For organizations outside Pinpoint, NeverBounce, Kickbox, and Mailgun Email Validation provide broader operational models rather than Pinpoint-specific setup.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several predictable pitfalls come up when teams select an email validation tool that cannot match their operational needs.
Treating validation as a one-time cleanse instead of an ongoing list hygiene process
ValiMail is built for continuous list hygiene with automated validation flows, so skipping re-validation reduces long-term bounce gains. NeverBounce, Snov.io Email Verifier, and Hunter Email Verifier are also positioned for repeated verification so contact datasets do not drift from their original classification.
Using pre-send validation outputs without wiring them into suppression and routing logic
NeverBounce returns clear deliverable and undeliverable statuses, but those outcomes only reduce bounces when they drive filtering and suppression. Bouncer adds risk scoring, so teams must connect scores and statuses to operational actions like blocking or re-verification.
Assuming email validation guarantees inbox delivery behavior
Mailgun Email Validation cannot guarantee future mailbox behavior or inbox delivery, so it should be treated as a pre-send readiness gate. Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation also improves delivery readiness inside Pinpoint workflows rather than providing audit-grade inbox confirmation outside that sending pipeline.
Over-optimizing for deep diagnostic detail when the workflow only needs deliverability readiness
Tools like Spokeo Email Validator and Hallerby Email Verifier focus on deliverability-focused decision-ready status results, which fits most pre-send hygiene workflows. Teams that need explainability beyond result categories may find limited diagnostic clarity in providers like NeverBounce and Kickbox, so decision rules should rely on outcomes that are actually returned.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features received a 0.4 weight. Ease of use received a 0.3 weight. Value received a 0.3 weight. The overall rating is a weighted average of those three inputs with overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. ValiMail separated itself from lower-ranked options by combining deliverability-oriented outcomes beyond format checking with automation-friendly continuous list hygiene workflows, which strengthened the features dimension and supported practical operational decisioning.
Frequently Asked Questions About Electronic Validation Software
Which electronic validation tools are best for reducing email bounces before sending?
NeverBounce is built for pre-send bounce reduction with deliverable, undeliverable, and risk states. Mailgun Email Validation also emphasizes per-address deliverability signals that support signup and outbound recipient validation via API responses.
How do deliverability-focused validators differ from syntax-only email checkers?
ValiMail highlights deliverability risk beyond format checks by flagging risky addresses during validation flows. Snov.io Email Verifier and Spokeo Email Validator focus on deliverability-oriented checks that return decision-ready status results rather than only syntax outcomes.
Which option fits teams that need real-time validation inside an app workflow?
Kickbox provides real-time email verification signals designed to integrate into automated screening of new and existing contacts via API. Bouncer and Hunter Email Verifier also support fast, API-driven bulk validation pipelines for operational enforcement in lead databases.
What tools support bulk list cleanup without turning validation into a manual process?
NeverBounce supports bulk validation runs for high-volume list cleanup with automated suppression decisions. Hallerby Email Verifier focuses on batch verification that keeps list cleanup workflows simple while still reducing bounce risk.
Which electronic validation software is tied to a specific sending platform workflow?
Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation fits teams using Amazon Pinpoint because validation readiness is aligned with Pinpoint journeys and campaign sending analytics. Mailgun Email Validation fits teams needing pre-send and pre-signup validation that returns machine-readable results directly to calling systems.
Which tools are best for validating email contacts that must be enriched or screened for data quality?
Kickbox is accuracy-first and supports enriching records alongside deliverability-focused validation signals. Snov.io Email Verifier returns metadata useful for lead list hygiene so the output can drive record cleanup decisions in sales and marketing operations.
How do role-based address handling and risk scoring show up in validation outputs?
Hunter Email Verifier classifies outcomes such as valid, invalid, and role-based to support outreach filtering without SMTP-level inbox monitoring. Bouncer adds risk scoring and maps validation outcomes to operational actions like suppression or re-verification.
What should teams do when validation results need to be rechecked over time?
Hunter Email Verifier supports historical hygiene by rechecking addresses as data changes. ValiMail also supports ongoing list hygiene with automated validation flows rather than passive reporting.
Which tools are suitable for reducing deliverability risk during signup and contact capture?
Mailgun Email Validation is strongest for pre-signup validation because it returns per-address validation results directly into signup workflows through API automation. Amazon Pinpoint Email Validation also supports a confirmation-style flow concept that reduces bounce risk before campaign sending inside the Pinpoint ecosystem.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.
