GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Digital Products And SoftwareTop 10 Best Document Making Software of 2026
Compare document making software options like Quip, Apache OpenOffice, and Templafy, with tradeoffs for teams choosing document tools.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Quip is the best pick for cross-functional teams making living business documents because section-linked chat keeps review context anchored right where changes happen, while Apache OpenOffice fits when you want offline, file-based document authoring with reliable mail merge from templates.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Quip
Section-linked chat threads let collaborators review and resolve inline without leaving the document.
Best for: Fits when cross-functional teams need section-anchored collaboration for living business documents.
Apache OpenOffice
Editor pickWriter’s mail merge uses template fields plus data sources to produce large batches of documents reliably offline.
Best for: Fits when organizations need local document authoring with controlled templates and batch generation.
Templafy
Editor pickClause library plus conditional blocks generate compliant variants from a single governed template.
Best for: Fits when mid-size to enterprise teams need governed document assembly with variable content.
Comparison Table
Quip
enterpriseSalesforce-owned collaborative document and spreadsheet platform combining chat threads with document creation.
Section-linked chat threads let collaborators review and resolve inline without leaving the document.
Quip’s primary strength is section-level collaboration where discussions, mentions, and decisions stay near the text that triggered them. Version history and document-level changes make it easier to trace edits across a shared workflow than with tools that only provide file-level history. Document templates help teams standardize proposals, meeting notes, and project writeups without building a custom form system.
A key tradeoff is format and automation depth. Quip is less suited for heavy clause-library assembly, conditional content blocks, or strict DOCX round-tripping compared with document assembly tools that specialize in those outputs. Quip fits best when a cross-functional team must co-author the narrative and action items while keeping feedback anchored to the exact section.
- +Inline chat tied to page sections keeps review context from drifting
- +Real-time co-authoring reduces handoff delays across writers and reviewers
- +Version history makes it easier to audit changes during ongoing drafts
- +Templates support consistent formatting for recurring team documents
- –Export and DOCX fidelity can be weaker than Word-first workflows
- –Advanced document assembly and clause libraries require external tooling
- –Deep governance controls are lighter than enterprise document platforms
- –Automation relies more on integrations than native workflow engines
Product and engineering teams
Draft specs with inline decisions
Faster spec iterations
Sales operations teams
Maintain proposal and playbook pages
More consistent proposals
Show 2 more scenarios
Project managers
Run weekly status updates collaboratively
Clearer progress reporting
Commented sections and version history simplify tracking what changed week to week.
Operations and compliance teams
Coordinate policy drafts with reviewers
Shorter review cycles
Inline feedback keeps redlines and rationale close to the policy text.
Best for: Fits when cross-functional teams need section-anchored collaboration for living business documents.
Apache OpenOffice
SMBFree open-source office suite providing the Writer word processor for desktop document creation.
Writer’s mail merge uses template fields plus data sources to produce large batches of documents reliably offline.
Apache OpenOffice Writer delivers WYSIWYG editing with styles, headings, and table-based layout tools that support consistent document formatting across long documents. Mail merge workflows use template fields and data sources to generate batch documents, and Writer’s track changes and comments support review cycles in file-based environments.
A key tradeoff is weaker DOCX fidelity for complex templates that rely on advanced features, which can lead to layout drift after round-tripping. OpenOffice fits teams that need on-premises document authoring without relying on cloud co-authoring, especially when document exchange is mostly stable and templates are controlled.
- +Offline document editing with predictable file-based workflow
- +Writer supports styles and reusable formatting for long documents
- +Mail merge generates batch documents from external data sources
- +Track changes and comments support review cycles on local files
- –Complex DOCX templates can lose formatting fidelity on round-trip
- –Collaboration and conflict resolution depend on external processes
- –Automation surface is limited compared with API-first document tools
- –Accessibility tooling is basic for advanced semantic tagging workflows
Publishing operations teams
Generate newsletters from controlled templates
Fewer manual edits per issue
Compliance documentation teams
Maintain versioned policy documents
Clear review history
Show 2 more scenarios
Education departments
Create worksheets with printable exports
Repeatable class materials
Writer and Impress exports support offline preparation of document packs for distribution.
SMBs with on-prem needs
Standardize documents without cloud co-authoring
Consistent desktop publishing
A local suite reduces dependency on browser-based editing and supports internal file workflows.
Best for: Fits when organizations need local document authoring with controlled templates and batch generation.
Templafy
enterpriseEnterprise document creation platform enforcing brand compliance, template management, and content governance across Microsoft Office and Google Workspace.
Clause library plus conditional blocks generate compliant variants from a single governed template.
Templafy’s core workflow centers on template-driven authoring, where users start from a governed document structure and then fill fields that map to mail merge variables. A clause library and content reuse reduce copy-paste drift across proposals, contracts, and internal forms. Conditional content blocks help assemble different sections based on chosen inputs, which cuts down on manual editing for variant documents.
The main tradeoff is that advanced governance requires disciplined onboarding of templates, categories, and permissions before teams can move quickly. Templafy fits when document volume is high and multiple roles need structured variability, such as sales proposals with client-specific terms and procurement-ready language.
- +Field-driven document authoring reduces formatting drift across templates
- +Clause library supports controlled reuse of frequently used contract language
- +Conditional content blocks assemble variant documents from the same template
- +Governance controls tie template access to roles and review workflows
- –Template and permission setup requires governance discipline before rollout
- –Conditional logic can be harder to maintain for highly complex clause trees
- –Deep configuration is less transparent than simple template libraries
- –Advanced automation depends on correct field mapping and data inputs
Sales ops teams
Proposal documents with per-account terms
Faster, consistent proposal generation
Legal operations
Standard clauses across contract variants
Lower clause deviation rates
Show 2 more scenarios
Procurement teams
Request and statement documents
Less manual document rework
Users generate structured documents from controlled templates with variable fields and governance.
Enterprise document admins
Role-based template governance
Audit-ready document governance
Administrators control who can apply which templates and manage change traceability.
Best for: Fits when mid-size to enterprise teams need governed document assembly with variable content.
Zoho Writer
SMBOnline word processor with collaboration, document automation, and e-signature integration within the Zoho suite.
Zoho Writer mail merge using template fields to mass-produce consistent documents from structured data sources.
Zoho Writer provides a browser-based WYSIWYG editor with document templates and collaborative editing for teams working on business documents.
- +Mail merge fields with template-driven document generation
- +Template library with reusable layouts for recurring business docs
- +Trackable co-authoring edits and comment-style review flow
- +Zoho identity and storage integration for consistent access control
- –Advanced publishing controls are weaker than dedicated document assembly tools
- –Conditional content blocks and complex rule-based clauses are limited
Sales ops teams
Generate standardized customer letters
Fewer manual letter edits
Customer support teams
Collaboratively draft policy notices
Faster internal approvals
Show 2 more scenarios
Business admins
Maintain DOCX-based document drafts
Consistent DOCX revisions
Import and edit DOCX files to keep formatting intact while producing updated internal documents.
Operations teams
Standardize repetitive recurring documents
More consistent paperwork
Use document templates to produce repeatable outputs like forms and notices at scale.
Best for: Fits when teams need template-driven documents with Zoho governance and collaboration for ongoing business workflows.
OnlyOffice
enterpriseSelf-hostable or cloud office suite with a document editor offering high Microsoft Office format fidelity.
Mail merge built for DOCX templates with reusable placeholders for consistent letter and report production.
OnlyOffice creates and edits DOCX-based documents with a desktop-like WYSIWYG editor plus co-authoring for shared work. It supports comment and track-changes workflows, along with document templates and mail-merge fields for repeatable paperwork.
- +DOCX-oriented editing keeps formatting closer to Microsoft Office documents
- +Track changes and comments support review cycles in shared documents
- +Template and mail-merge tools reduce manual rework for recurring letters
- +On-premises deployment option supports internal document hosting policies
- –Conditional document behavior is limited compared with dedicated document-automation tools
- –API surface requires more systems integration work than spreadsheet-first editors
- –Complex layouts can shift slightly on import from heavily styled DOCX files
- –Granular field-level permissions for merged outputs are not a first-class workflow
Documentation teams
Edit content then export to PDF
Portable published documents
Editorial managers
Run comment and tracked-change reviews
Traceable revision workflows
Show 2 more scenarios
Records operations teams
Index scanned documents for search
Searchable digital records
Capture paper inputs, apply OCR and indexing workflows, and manage searchable document collections.
IT-managed enterprises
Self-host shared document editing
Controlled collaborative workspaces
Deploy document collaboration services for internal hosting with organization-controlled access.
Best for: Fits when teams need DOCX-first co-authoring and review workflows with internal hosting requirements.
Microsoft Word
enterpriseIndustry-standard word processor for creating, editing, and formatting documents across desktop, web, and mobile platforms.
Track Changes with review views that align tightly with Word’s native DOCX rendering and revision data.
Microsoft Word is a document authoring tool centered on DOCX editing and long-established office compatibility. It delivers WYSIWYG layout with advanced formatting controls, tracked changes, and mail merge fields for producing document sets.
- +DOCX round-tripping keeps complex formatting stable across Microsoft environments
- +Track changes and comments support structured review and revision audits
- +Mail merge fields handle variable data printing from connected data sources
- +Office add-ins and Microsoft Graph enable automation around Word content
- –Add-ins and templates often drive workflow standardization more than core controls
- –Some advanced layout behaviors depend on Word’s rendering engine
- –Granular permissions for sections are limited compared with stronger document assembly systems
- –Automated document generation can require add-ins or Microsoft 365 integration
Corporate communications
Produce mail-merged document sets
Personalized outputs at scale
Legal teams
Manage tracked changes and comments
Clear revision trails
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations analysts
Co-author drafts in Microsoft 365
Less version confusion
Use cloud co-authoring to update shared DOCX documents while retaining change history.
Office automation teams
Integrate documents with Office add-ins
Reduced manual formatting
Apply automation through Office add-ins and export to PDF for downstream distribution.
Best for: Fits when teams need high-fidelity DOCX editing with review workflows and mail merge from Microsoft 365.
WPS Office
SMBCross-platform office suite with a word processor offering a Microsoft Office-like interface and tabbed document editing.
Template library plus Office-style editing tools for rapid creation of standard business documents from existing layouts.
WPS Office focuses on document authoring for organizations that need Microsoft Office compatible editing with low-friction file interchange. It includes a WYSIWYG word processor, spreadsheet and presentation tools, and a document template library for common formats.
- +Strong DOCX round-tripping for typical formatting, styles, and tables
- +Track changes and comments support standard review workflows
- +Template library accelerates memo and report layout creation
- +PDF export output options fit routine publishing pipelines
- –Fewer enterprise-grade document lifecycle controls than higher-ranked suites
- –Co-authoring conflict resolution details are less transparent than competitors
- –Limited depth for structured content reuse beyond basic styles
- –Advanced accessibility and redaction workflows require extra attention
Freelancers and office staff
Draft formatted business letters
Polished documents for sharing
Client-service groups
Exchange drafts using comments and changes
Approved draft versions
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations and bureaus
Standardize recurring office reports
Streamlined recurring production
Combine templates, styles, and repeatable layouts to reduce variation in monthly documents.
Administrative teams
Create batches of letters and labels
Faster bulk communications
Use mail merge with spreadsheet data to generate personalized letters and labels efficiently.
Best for: Fits when teams prioritize Office-file compatibility and fast template-based drafting in mixed document environments.
Coda
SMBDocuments that function as lightweight applications with embedded tables, buttons, and integrations.
Doc blocks that compute from linked tables to drive conditional content inside the same document.
Coda turns structured documents into interactive apps by combining text, tables, and custom formulas. It supports document templates and repeatable sections so teams can reuse clause-like content across many outputs.
- +Interactive documents with formulas that compute, format, and drive workflows
- +API and automations connect document content to external systems
- +Reusable templates and repeatable sections reduce manual formatting work
- +Workspace controls include RBAC, SSO, and audit logging
- –DOCX round-tripping is limited compared with word processors for complex layouts
- –Deep automation requires formula and automation design discipline
Process owners
Document workflows with actionable records
Reference plus execution support
Freelancers and individuals
Organize notes and project trackers
One place for planning
Show 2 more scenarios
Marketing and editorial teams
Run living briefs with review status
Writing with built-in tracking
Draft living briefs while tracking ownership, feedback state, and linked records beside the text.
Project operations teams
Track portfolio status in linked tables
Shared status source
Use linked tables and views to manage dependencies, workstreams, and cross-project status.
Best for: Fits when teams need document assembly plus data-driven logic for repeatable deliverables.
Craft
SMBBlock-based document editor with nested pages, styling, and offline sync across Apple platforms.
Craft templates and page linking work together so related documents stay consistent as content changes.
Craft turns document creation into a block-and-page builder where content becomes a navigable workspace, not just a text file. It supports wiki-like linking between pages, reusable templates, and variable insertion so document sets can stay consistent.
- +Block-based editor with page nesting for multi-document writing workflows
- +Reusable templates keep repeated sections consistent across document sets
- +Built-in page linking supports traceable references across long documents
- +Revision history records changes at the page level during collaboration
- –DOCX round-tripping is not a priority, so formatting fidelity can drop
- –Advanced review workflows like granular track changes and redaction need external steps
- –Structured clause libraries and mail merge fields are not document-centric primitives
- –Large document performance can degrade when many linked pages render together
Small collaborative teams
Collect feedback on shared structured pages
Faster review and alignment
Freelancers and small teams
Produce recurring specification documents
More consistent deliverables
Show 2 more scenarios
Writers and consultants
Draft polished reports from scratch
Presentation-ready drafts
Turn rough notes into formatted, shareable documents without moving immediately to a separate word processor.
Project leads
Convert meeting notes into decision records
Readable decision history
Link decision context into polished documents so reviews attach feedback to the relevant content.
Best for: Fits when teams need fast page-based document assembly with templates and linked references for internal deliverables.
LibreOffice
SMBOpen-source desktop office suite with the Writer word processor supporting ODF and Microsoft file formats.
Macro-driven document automation using the built-in UNO scripting framework across Writer, Calc, and Impress.
LibreOffice fits teams that need an offline-capable document editor with strong format compatibility and no reliance on a browser. Writer, Calc, Impress, and Draw cover core authoring, spreadsheets, slides, and vector diagrams under one installation.
- +Writer style system improves consistent typography across large document sets
- +Strong DOCX and PPTX import-export support for mixed Office environments
- +Document production automation via built-in macro framework
- +Offline-first deployment suits locked-down desktops and air-gapped networks
- –DOCX round-tripping can still alter complex layouts with fields and objects
- –Advanced collaboration workflows are limited compared with cloud-native editors
- –Mail merge automation depends heavily on template and field hygiene
- –Extensibility via add-ons needs careful version and platform matching
Small teams and individuals
Author contracts offline on desktops
No connectivity required
Administrative and legal reviewers
Review drafts with tracked changes
Structured revision handling
Show 2 more scenarios
Teams exchanging external files
Edit office files and export to PDF
Routine cross-suite handoffs
Round-trip common office formats and export documents to PDF for cross-suite sharing.
Operations and power users
Automate recurring document steps with macros
Less manual repetition
Use macros to automate repeated calculations and document production steps.
Best for: Fits when organizations need offline document authoring and dependable Office-format exchange without cloud collaboration.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 document making software, Quip stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Document Making Software
Document making software is used to author, assemble, and standardize professional documents using templates, reusable content blocks, and review workflows that keep formatting and intent consistent. This guide covers Templafy, Quip, Apache OpenOffice, Zoho Writer, OnlyOffice, WPS Office, Craft, Microsoft Word, Coda, and LibreOffice.
The comparison focus emphasizes how each tool handles template governance, collaboration context, and automation through built-in features or an external API and integration surface. Templafy leads with clause library control and conditional blocks, while Quip centers section-anchored discussion tied to the document itself.
Document Making Software for governed templates, collaboration workflows, and repeatable assembly
Document making software combines a writing editor with structured reuse mechanisms like template libraries, mail merge fields, and reusable clauses to generate repeatable documents from controlled inputs. Tools in this category also differ in how they support collaboration, including track changes, inline comments, section-linked discussions, and co-authoring conflict handling.
Templafy is built for governed document assembly using a clause library and conditional blocks that generate compliant variants from a single controlled template. Quip emphasizes section-linked chat threads so collaborators resolve items in context without leaving the document structure.
Key evaluation points for Document Making Software in regulated drafting
Governed template reuse prevents formatting drift and clause inconsistency when many writers assemble similar documents. Tools differ sharply in how they structure controlled variation and how they keep collaboration context aligned to the right sections.
This section compares four capability areas across the reviewed products so buyers can map document assembly needs to concrete editor and automation behavior, not generic “template support.”
Clause reuse and conditional variation inside one governed template
Templafy uses a clause library plus conditional blocks to generate compliant variants from one controlled template. Craft focuses on templates and page linking so related documents stay consistent as content changes.
Section-anchored collaboration that resolves discussion in context
Quip ties section-linked chat threads to the document so collaborators review and resolve items without losing placement context. Templafy emphasizes governed authoring that can reduce drift across templates rather than discussion anchored to page sections.
DOCX-first fidelity for round-tripping and standard review workflows
WPS Office provides strong DOCX round-tripping for typical formatting, styles, and tables while supporting track changes and comments. Microsoft Word aligns tightly with DOCX rendering and revision data so track changes and comments behave like native Word workflows.
Mail merge generation from template fields and structured data
Apache OpenOffice runs mail merge with template fields plus data sources to produce large batches offline. Zoho Writer also uses mail merge fields to mass-produce consistent documents from structured data sources.
Automation integration surface for data-driven document logic
Coda combines doc blocks that compute from linked tables with an API and automations so document content can drive external workflows. Quip provides strong inline collaboration but relies on external tooling for advanced document assembly and clause libraries.
Decision framework for choosing Document Making Software by workflow control
Document making software choices hinge on how much control must be enforced during authoring, and where collaboration and automation run. Buyers should compare governance depth and collaboration anchoring, then select an authoring base that matches the required exchange format.
The steps below split decisions by product philosophy. The path differs between governed clause-driven assembly and section-anchored collaboration, and it also changes when offline batch generation or DOCX-native review fidelity is the priority.
Choose governed assembly or collaboration-anchored editing
If the priority is governed document assembly with controlled clause variation, evaluate Templafy because it pairs a clause library with conditional blocks. If the priority is resolving review items in the right place inside the document structure, evaluate Quip because it anchors chat threads to sections.
Match the document exchange format to the editor base
If DOCX round-tripping and native-style review behavior matter, compare WPS Office and Microsoft Word since both emphasize track changes and comment workflows aligned to DOCX rendering. If local offline authoring and Office-format exchange without cloud collaboration are primary, compare Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice.
Plan for merge-driven batch creation from structured data
If the workflow is large batch generation offline with predictable template fields, evaluate Apache OpenOffice because its mail merge is built for reliable offline batches. If the workflow is template-driven business document production inside a broader Zoho collaboration environment, evaluate Zoho Writer because it uses template-field mail merge and a template library.
Decide how conditional content and clause complexity will be maintained
If conditional content and complex clause trees need to be governed centrally, prefer Templafy because conditional logic is designed around controlled template variation. If conditional behavior is less complex and linked consistency across pages is the goal, prefer Craft because it keeps related documents consistent through page linking and templates.
Confirm whether advanced automation requires external integration work
If automation depends on computed document logic and external systems, compare Coda because it pairs doc blocks with an API and automations. If automation requirements are primarily review and document editing rather than computed logic, compare products that focus on DOCX-oriented editing such as OnlyOffice and WPS Office.
Who benefits from these Document Making Software capabilities
Different teams prioritize different control points during authoring, review, and generation. The tool choice changes based on governance requirements, collaboration model, and whether output must remain stable through DOCX exchange.
The segments below align common procurement scenarios to concrete behaviors in the reviewed tools.
Mid-size to enterprise document teams that standardize contract and policy wording
Templafy fits because its clause library plus conditional blocks generate compliant variants from a single governed template with field-driven authoring.
Cross-functional teams managing living business documents with frequent inline review
Quip fits because section-linked chat threads keep review context attached to the document structure during real-time co-authoring.
Organizations that need offline batch generation from template fields and data sources
Apache OpenOffice fits because Writer mail merge with data sources supports reliable offline document editing and batch creation.
Teams that must preserve complex formatting across Office environments and review cycles
Microsoft Word and WPS Office fit when DOCX round-tripping and track changes behavior need to align closely with Word-style revision data and rendering.
Teams that want document content to compute from data and trigger automated workflows
Coda fits because its doc blocks compute from linked tables and its API and automations connect document content to external systems.
Common pitfalls when buying Document Making Software
A common failure mode is treating template support as a substitute for governance. Another failure mode is choosing a collaboration model that does not match how reviewers locate and resolve changes.
The pitfalls below map to concrete gaps observed across the reviewed tools.
Choosing a template tool without planning for clause variation governance
Templafy can reduce drift through field-driven authoring and conditional blocks, but template and permission setup requires governance discipline before rollout.
Assuming DOCX fidelity will hold for complex round-trips without validation
Craft deprioritizes DOCX round-tripping, so formatting fidelity can drop for workflows that depend on heavy DOCX object layouts. Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice can still alter complex layouts with fields and objects during DOCX round-tripping.
Overestimating in-editor collaboration for advanced document assembly
Quip provides section-anchored chat and real-time co-authoring, but export and DOCX fidelity can be weaker than Word-first workflows. Quip also requires external tooling for advanced document assembly and clause libraries.
Selecting a suite for mail merge while ignoring conditional clause needs
Zoho Writer can mass-produce consistent documents with template fields, but conditional content blocks and complex rule-based clauses are limited. Templafy better fits when complex clause trees must be maintained as governed conditional variants.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated document making software on feature coverage first at 40% weight, focusing on governed template reuse, mail merge generation, and collaborative review mechanics. Ease of use and value each received 30% weight based on how directly writers and reviewers can operate templates, comments, and track changes in everyday workflows. Templafy ranked highest because it combines a clause library with conditional blocks that generate compliant variants from a single governed template, and it pairs that control with field-driven authoring that reduces formatting drift across templates.
Frequently Asked Questions About Document Making Software
How do Templafy, OnlyOffice, and Microsoft Word automate consistent clause and field content?
Which tool handles section-linked collaboration with inline resolution: Quip or Microsoft Word?
When document changes must be traceable, how do audit trails differ across Templafy and Coda?
What integration and API options are available for data-driven document assembly in Coda versus Templafy?
How do teams migrate existing DOCX or template libraries into OnlyOffice and WPS Office?
Which tool supports SSO and RBAC administration more directly for document workspaces: Coda or Templafy?
What breaks if documents require offline-first batch generation: Apache OpenOffice versus Quip?
How do admin controls differ for internal hosting and permission enforcement in OnlyOffice versus LibreOffice?
When a workflow needs computed conditional content inside a single document, where does Coda fall short compared to Templafy?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Digital Products And SoftwareTop 10 Best Document Building Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Software Making Software of 2026
- Digital Products And SoftwareTop 10 Best Survey Making Software of 2026
- Digital Products And SoftwareTop 10 Best Document Language Translation Software of 2026
- Customer Experience In IndustryTop 10 Best Quotation Making Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Digital Products And Software alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of digital products and software tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare digital products and software tools→