GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Manufacturing EngineeringTop 10 Best Design Circuit Software of 2026
Top 10 design circuit software picks for drafting, PCB and circuits work, ranked by features and tradeoffs for engineers and designers.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Siemens Xpedition is the right enterprise pick for governed ECAD teams that need repeatable, manufacturing-ready outputs through complex collaborative workflows, whereas Proteus fits teams wanting integrated schematic drafting with simulation feedback before locking in PCB layout.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Siemens Xpedition
Integrated connectivity-driven constraint evaluation that keeps schematic intent synchronized during PCB rule checking.
Built for fits when teams require governed ECAD workflows with rule checks and repeatable manufacturing outputs..
OrCAD X
Editor pickNetlist-driven connectivity keeps schematic intent and PCB routing synchronized during constraint checks.
Built for fits when established ECAD processes need netlist-based constraint enforcement and predictable manufacturing outputs..
Cadence Allegro X
Editor pickConstraint management tightly integrated with verification to keep board intent consistent during revision iterations.
Built for fits when experienced teams need automated PCB rule checks across frequent hardware revisions..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Siemens Xpedition
enterpriseEnterprise PCB design software for complex electronic systems and collaborative engineering workflows.
Integrated connectivity-driven constraint evaluation that keeps schematic intent synchronized during PCB rule checking.
Siemens Xpedition connects schematic data to PCB implementation so routing, component placement, and constraints update against the same connectivity source. The workflow emphasizes rule evaluation, including design rule check and electrical rule check, which helps teams detect violations before manufacturing file generation. Manufacturing outputs cover common fabrication and assembly file sets such as Gerber, Excellon drill, ODB++ exports, and pick-and-place generation.
A tradeoff appears in adoption friction when organizations require strict configuration alignment across projects, libraries, and rule decks before engineers see consistent results. Xpedition fits situations where multiple teams revise the same design intent, including constraint management and library governance, while keeping outputs repeatable for assembly and fabrication.
- +Tight schematic-to-layout connectivity propagation for consistent rule checks
- +Rule-driven DRC and ERC workflows reduce late-stage fix cycles
- +Fabrication and assembly outputs include Gerber, Excellon, ODB++, and pick-place
- +Strong configuration support for managing shared libraries across projects
- –Needs upfront rule deck and library configuration discipline
- –Automation scripting depth can require vendor-specific workflows
- –Large-project performance depends on hardware and configuration choices
- –Cross-tool integration can add coordination overhead in mixed stacks
Mixed-signal ECAD teams
Catch electrical and layout violations early
Fewer late re-spins
PCB manufacturing engineering
Generate fabrication and assembly packages
More consistent handoffs
Show 2 more scenarios
Enterprises with shared libraries
Maintain component and footprint governance
Lower library drift
Control updates to symbols and footprints across projects to reduce part mismatches.
Concurrent hardware release teams
Coordinate multi-person revisions safely
Tighter release control
Use controlled project revisions so schematic and PCB changes remain traceable for rule evaluation and outputs.
Best for: Fits when teams require governed ECAD workflows with rule checks and repeatable manufacturing outputs.
More related reading
OrCAD X
enterpriseProfessional PCB design software covering schematic entry, layout, analysis, and documentation.
Netlist-driven connectivity keeps schematic intent and PCB routing synchronized during constraint checks.
OrCAD X centers on a schematic-to-PCB workflow where connectivity stays consistent through netlist generation, and layout feedback can map issues back to schematic intent. Design rule check and electrical rule check workflows help enforce constraint management during editing and routing. Its strength is continuity across drafting, layout, and downstream manufacturing file preparation using established ECAD output formats.
A tradeoff is that deep automation and governance usually require process discipline around constraints, library revisions, and project configuration. OrCAD X is a strong fit for regulated hardware teams that need repeatable check passes and predictable export outputs for assembly and manufacturing teams.
- +Tight schematic to PCB connectivity via netlist-driven workflow
- +Design rule check and electrical rule check support during layout
- +Manufacturing exports include Gerber and drill generation outputs
- +Cadence library and data workflows reduce handoff drift
- –Automation depth depends on setup of project constraints and configuration
- –Extensibility often relies on Cadence-centric integration paths
- –Toolchain learning curve is higher than simpler ECAD editors
- –Collaboration workflows can require careful library revision management
PCB layout engineers
Route with rule enforcement and feedback
Fewer late ECO cycles
Electronics design teams
Release manufacturable designs from ECAD
Repeatable manufacturing package
Show 1 more scenario
Hardware program managers
Control library revisions across releases
Lower integration friction
Project configuration and library management support consistent outputs across iterations.
Best for: Fits when established ECAD processes need netlist-based constraint enforcement and predictable manufacturing outputs.
Cadence Allegro X
enterpriseHigh-end PCB design software for advanced layout, constraints, analysis, and manufacturing preparation.
Constraint management tightly integrated with verification to keep board intent consistent during revision iterations.
Allegro X is built for PCB layout work where rule intent has to travel with the design, not live only as manual checks. The workflow centers on constraint management, ERC and DRC-style verification, and export of manufacturing deliverables like Gerber, drill, and pick-and-place outputs. Cadence tool integration also supports higher throughput for teams that need consistent rules across revisions and design variants.
A key tradeoff is that Allegro X typically requires disciplined setup of rule decks and constraint structures before it can pay off during fast iteration. It fits best when multiple engineers collaborate on the same layout ruleset and expect stable behavior across frequent spins.
- +Constraint-driven verification that scales to large, rule-heavy layouts
- +Repeatable manufacturing output generation for board spins
- +Net connectivity integrity maintained through schematic-to-layout flow
- +Strong workflow fit for team-based PCB revisions
- –Rule-deck setup and tuning take significant upfront time
- –Workspace and library management needs consistent team conventions
- –Learning curve increases with advanced automation and constraint usage
- –Some advanced analysis workflows depend on additional Cadence components
PCB layout engineers
Rule-driven layout with frequent spins
Fewer late-stage respins
Hardware teams
Collaborative constraint standards
Uniform DRC and ERC results
Show 2 more scenarios
Manufacturing integration leads
Deliverables packaging per board
More predictable fabrication handoffs
Generate Gerber, drill, and assembly outputs with stable configuration across revisions.
Design rule owners
Ruleset governance over projects
Controlled rule evolution
Maintain rule decks and constraint structures so verification stays aligned with board intent.
Best for: Fits when experienced teams need automated PCB rule checks across frequent hardware revisions.
Proteus
vertical specialistCircuit design and simulation software with schematic capture, microcontroller simulation, and PCB layout.
Tight schematic-to-SPICE simulation integration keeps verification in the same workflow as circuit capture.
Proteus combines schematic capture, PCB-oriented design workflows, and simulation-driven verification in one ECAD environment. It is distinct for coupling circuit drafting with simulation feedback during the design loop, which helps teams validate behavior before layout signoff.
Proteus also manages component data, symbols, and footprints so schematic-to-board referencing stays consistent. Its workflow supports netlisting for simulation and exports common manufacturing outputs used for downstream fabrication and assembly.
- +Schematic-to-simulation loop reduces time spent debugging late-stage faults.
- +Component, symbol, and footprint management helps keep schematic references consistent.
- +Netlist generation supports iterative verification without exporting to separate tools.
- +Manufacturing output generation streamlines handoff to PCB fabrication workflows.
- –Deep PCB constraint management can feel less granular than specialist ECAD tools.
- –Simulation accuracy depends heavily on model quality and parameter discipline.
- –Large multi-sheet projects need careful organization to avoid navigation overhead.
- –Automation hooks are limited compared with tools that offer scriptable design-rule pipelines.
Best for: Fits when teams want integrated schematic drafting and simulation feedback before final PCB layout.
NI Multisim
vertical specialistInteractive circuit simulation software for schematic design, analysis, and electronics education.
SPICE-driven simulation tied to schematic connectivity with interactive probes and measurements for iterative electrical validation.
NI Multisim performs schematic capture and SPICE simulation with direct electrical connectivity between the drawn circuit and the simulator setup.
The workflow emphasizes iterative probing, measurements, and stimulus configuration so functional and analog behavior can be verified before downstream PCB activities.
Connectivity export through netlists supports handoff to PCB layout stages, but full ECAD production coverage is not its primary strength.
Design rule checking and manufacturing-centric automation are comparatively limited versus dedicated PCB-centric ECAD suites.
- +Tight schematic-to-simulation loop using SPICE-driven analysis and measurement probes
- +Component and stimulus workflow that supports repeatable test scenarios
- +Netlist generation that keeps simulation connectivity aligned to the drawn design
- +Library support for common electronics building blocks and instrumentation
- –PCB design rule check depth is not as feature-complete as dedicated PCB ECAD tools
- –Manufacturing file output breadth is narrower than workflows centered on Gerber and full DFM
- –Advanced constraint management and impedance control tooling can require additional workflow steps
- –Large hierarchical designs need disciplined organization to keep simulation and probing manageable
Best for: Fits when teams need fast schematic validation and SPICE-based iteration before handing off to PCB tools.
Altium Designer
enterprisePCB design software for schematic capture, layout, routing, and manufacturing documentation.
Altium Designer’s integrated constraint management keeps PCB routing intent synchronized with schematic connectivity during edits.
Altium Designer is a full ECAD stack that ties schematic capture, PCB layout, and rule-driven checking into one working design database. It supports constraint-driven routing and iterative design rule check loops that reduce time spent hunting connectivity and fabrication issues.
The toolchain also covers manufacturing deliverable outputs like Gerber, Excellon drill, and ODB++ for downstream workflow continuity. Altium Designer is a fit for teams that need automation through scripting and tight editor integration across the schematic to layout handoff.
- +Single design database links schematic intent to PCB implementation.
- +Constraint management and design rule check workflow supports iterative quality gates.
- +Extensive manufacturing outputs include Gerber, Excellon drill, and ODB++.
- +Scripting and automation hooks support repeatable project setup.
- –Tool setup and project configuration take time for consistent team results.
- –Advanced signal and integrity workflows depend on additional configuration effort.
- –Large projects can feel heavy without disciplined library and template practices.
- –Cross-team collaboration requires careful workflow planning around revisions.
Best for: Fits when ECAD teams need tight schematic-to-PCB consistency plus automation for repeatable releases.
EasyEDA
SMBBrowser-based PCB design software with schematic capture, layout, simulation, and component ordering.
Netlist-based schematic to PCB linking keeps connectivity changes consistent during layout updates.
EasyEDA pairs fast schematic capture with board layout under one editor, which reduces handoff friction between schematic and PCB work. The tool supports an integrated library workflow for schematic symbols and PCB footprints, and it can generate manufacturing-ready exports like Gerber files and drill outputs.
Netlist-driven PCB association helps preserve connectivity from schematic to layout, which speeds design iteration. EasyEDA also offers simulation and rule-checking paths for early electrical validation before committing to manufacturing outputs.
- +Single workspace connects schematic to PCB routing and connectivity
- +Library workflow supports symbol-to-footprint consistency during edits
- +Gerber and Excellon drill exports fit common fab handoff needs
- +ERC and design rule checks catch constraint issues before export
- –Signal integrity and impedance control depth is limited versus EDA specialists
- –Advanced constraint management needs careful manual setup for complex boards
- –Automation and API extensibility are thinner than tools built for scripting
- –Multi-project governance and audit visibility are not as granular as enterprise ECAD
Best for: Fits when teams need fast schematic-to-PCB iteration with standard export outputs for manufacturing.
LTspice
vertical specialistSPICE-based analog circuit simulator for schematic entry, transient analysis, and waveform inspection.
SPICE simulation controls with built-in plotting and measurement scripting tied directly to schematic nodes.
LTspice from Analog Devices is a schematic capture and SPICE simulation workflow tool that focuses on fast SPICE analysis tightly coupled to circuit editing. The core strength is its tight loop between schematic changes, netlist generation, and SPICE simulation, which reduces the friction between design iteration and waveform review.
Component symbol and footprint handling supports practical circuit drafting and handoff prep through standard manufacturing exports. Its power analysis coverage is most consistent for designers who already think in SPICE terms and want a single workspace for modeling and measurement-style probing.
- +Tight schematic-to-netlist workflow that shortens simulation iteration cycles
- +Rich measurement and probing commands for repeatable waveform inspection
- +Large built-in component and example library for common analog topologies
- +Works well for mixed-signal experiments using SPICE-driven behavioral models
- –PCB layout capability is limited compared with full ECAD PCB design suites
- –Advanced data exchange needs extra steps for downstream fabrication workflows
- –Constraint management and rules checks are not designed to match PCB-first toolchains
- –Large designs can feel slow during schematic editing and netlisting
Best for: Fits when circuit designers need SPICE-first iteration with schematic capture and measurement-style probing.
CircuitLab
SMBWeb-based schematic editor and circuit simulator for analog and digital circuit analysis.
Integrated SPICE simulation with live instrument views tied to the schematic wiring.
CircuitLab lets designers capture schematic and place components directly onto a simulated circuit. The workflow supports SPICE simulation and shows measured signals on instruments like scopes and meters.
PCB creation is available after circuit definition, with net awareness carried from schematic into the layout stage. The tool focuses on iterative electronics design rather than full ECAD fabrication output coverage.
- +SPICE simulation and instrument readouts support rapid electronics iteration
- +Schematic-to-layout net consistency reduces manual reconnection work
- +Interactive wiring and component placement are quick for small to mid projects
- +Versioning helps track circuit changes during experimentation
- –PCB output depth is thinner than dedicated ECAD for manufacturing packages
- –Advanced constraint-driven routing and rule sets are limited versus enterprise flows
- –Signal integrity and power integrity analysis modules are not a full coverage workflow
- –Large libraries and BOM export automation can be restrictive for hardware teams
Best for: Fits when early-stage circuit validation and quick PCB drafts matter more than full manufacturing package automation.
DipTrace
SMBPCB design software for schematic capture, component management, layout, and manufacturing outputs.
Netlist-to-board rule checking keeps schematic connectivity and PCB constraints synchronized during layout iterations.
DipTrace targets schematic capture and PCB layout for engineers who want one toolchain for drafting, footprint work, and connectivity checks. DipTrace includes netlist-driven workflows that connect schematic connectivity to PCB routing and board-rule checking.
The software supports component and footprint libraries, BOM export, and manufacturing output generation for common CAM targets. DipTrace also covers electronics verification flows such as design-rule checks tied to the board build artifacts.
- +Single workflow from schematic drafting to PCB connectivity checks
- +Library-centric component and footprint management for repeat designs
- +Board-rule checks follow schematic connectivity and pin mapping
- +CAM-style output generation for typical PCB manufacturing handoffs
- –Automation and integration surface is limited compared with higher-end ECAD suites
- –Complex constraint management can feel manual on large multi-sheet schematics
- –Advanced signal integrity and simulation depth is narrower than SPICE-first environments
- –Version-controlled hardware design workflows depend on external process
Best for: Fits when small teams need consistent schematic-to-PCB drafting without heavy third-party glue.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 manufacturing engineering, Siemens Xpedition stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right design circuit software
Design circuit software covers schematic capture, connectivity syncing for PCB layout, and simulation-driven validation workflows that keep circuit intent consistent from wiring to manufacturing outputs. This guide covers Siemens Xpedition, OrCAD X, Cadence Allegro X, Proteus, NI Multisim, Altium Designer, EasyEDA, LTspice, CircuitLab, and DipTrace.
The picks emphasize integration depth across schematic, netlist, and constraint checks, plus the automation and extensibility surface teams use for repeatable design rule enforcement. The tools are grouped by how they maintain schematic-to-layout connectivity and how they handle verification loops.
Design circuit software for schematic capture, PCB connectivity, and rule-based verification
Design circuit software is used to create circuit schematics, generate netlists for connectivity-driven workflows, and run SPICE-based simulation or verification tied to the captured wiring. The software category typically coordinates schematic intent with PCB routing and rule checking so that revisions do not require manual reconnection.
Siemens Xpedition and OrCAD X illustrate the connectivity-first approach by using netlist-driven or connectivity propagation workflows to synchronize constraint checks during PCB design. Proteus highlights a different emphasis by keeping the schematic-to-SPICE simulation loop inside the same drafting workflow for earlier electrical feedback before full PCB layout.
Integration depth for schematic connectivity, rule checks, and SPICE validation
Design circuit software is judged by how reliably schematic connectivity drives downstream verification and layout behavior, not by how many tools exist in the workspace. Siemens Xpedition and OrCAD X keep routing intent aligned with schematic intent through netlist-driven workflows, which reduces manual reconnection during iteration.
Connectivity-propagated rule checking across schematic and PCB
Siemens Xpedition and OrCAD X enforce PCB constraints using schematic intent carried through connectivity and netlist workflows during rule checks, which supports consistent fixes during late edits.
Constraint management tied to verification during board revisions
Cadence Allegro X and Altium Designer combine constraint management with verification workflows so board intent stays consistent across frequent revisions.
Schematic-to-SPICE workflow for early electrical validation
Proteus and NI Multisim keep SPICE simulation feedback inside the schematic workflow, which shortens the time from wiring changes to interactive validation results.
Schematic-to-netlist iteration speed for waveform probing
LTspice and CircuitLab focus on SPICE-first iteration with measurement and instrument views tied to schematic nodes for repeatable inspection while refining circuits.
Single-workspace drafting with connectivity consistency
EasyEDA and DipTrace emphasize an integrated schematic-to-PCB workflow so connectivity changes stay consistent during layout updates without heavy third-party glue.
Manufacturing output breadth for PCB releases
Siemens Xpedition and Cadence Allegro X generate repeatable manufacturing outputs suitable for board spins, while NI Multisim and CircuitLab show narrower coverage when the workflow centers on dedicated ECAD PCB manufacturing packaging.
Choose the workflow philosophy that matches the team’s verification loop
The best fit depends on how the team prefers to catch issues, either by pushing connectivity into PCB rule checks early or by pulling electrical validation forward via SPICE while drafting. Siemens Xpedition and OrCAD X favor connectivity-driven constraint enforcement during PCB work, while Proteus and NI Multisim favor simulation feedback inside the schematic workflow.
Pick a connectivity-first ECAD control loop if rule checks dominate fixes
Select Siemens Xpedition or OrCAD X when schematic connectivity and netlists must drive constraint checks during layout, because both tools keep routing intent synchronized for consistent rule-driven edits.
Pick a SPICE-inside-capture loop if electrical feedback is the gating step
Select Proteus or NI Multisim when the schematic drafting workflow must produce simulation feedback before final PCB layout, because both tools keep the SPICE loop closely tied to captured wiring.
Choose enterprise constraint revision workflows for large, rule-heavy boards
Choose Cadence Allegro X or Siemens Xpedition when repeated board spins require constraint management that scales across large, rule-heavy layouts, because both tools center verification behavior around constraint-driven iteration.
Estimate rule-deck configuration effort against team governance discipline
Choose Altium Designer or Cadence Allegro X when the team will invest time to tune project configuration so constraint-driven quality gates stay consistent across releases.
Select a lighter integrated path when complexity stays within drafting scope
Choose EasyEDA or DipTrace when connectivity consistency matters more than deep constraint-driven routing and impedance control, because both tools support schematic-to-PCB updates in one workspace with thinner high-end integrity coverage.
Match SPICE depth and data exchange needs to downstream PCB workflows
Choose LTspice or CircuitLab when circuit designers need SPICE-first probing and measurement scripting tied to schematic nodes, while planning for extra steps when downstream fabrication workflows require deeper PCB ECAD packaging.
Teams that benefit from netlist-driven synchronization or capture-linked SPICE loops
Design circuit software fits teams that must keep electrical intent consistent from wiring to manufacturing output, because connectivity synchronization and rule checks determine how fast a board spin converges. Siemens Xpedition and OrCAD X align schematic intent with PCB routing constraint checks, which supports governed ECAD workflows.
ECAD teams running governed PCB rule checks across board revisions
Siemens Xpedition and Cadence Allegro X support constraint management that stays linked to verification and manufacturing output generation for repeatable revisions.
Circuit design teams using SPICE as the primary validation gate before PCB layout
Proteus and NI Multisim keep the schematic-to-SPICE loop tight so electrical validation happens during capture, reducing late-stage wiring and parameter debugging.
Designers focused on SPICE-first waveform probing and repeatable measurement scripts
LTspice and CircuitLab tie measurement and instrument views to schematic nodes, which supports iterative electrical refinement without waiting for full PCB routing cycles.
Smaller teams needing integrated schematic-to-board drafting without heavy configuration overhead
EasyEDA and DipTrace keep a single workspace connection between schematic changes and PCB routing checks, which supports consistent drafting even when complex constraint management becomes manual.
Common setup and workflow errors that create rework across schematic and PCB
A frequent failure mode is assuming that connectivity stays consistent without aligning rule configuration, because enterprise tools rely on constraint propagation that depends on disciplined setup. Siemens Xpedition and Cadence Allegro X both reduce late fixes only when rule decks, libraries, and workspace conventions are tuned for the team’s design style.
Treating rule-deck and library configuration as one-time setup instead of part of the iteration loop
Siemens Xpedition and Cadence Allegro X benefit from ongoing rule deck tuning and library management because consistent rule checks rely on synchronized constraint evaluation and repeatable manufacturing output generation.
Over-relying on SPICE outputs without verifying component model quality and parameter discipline
Proteus and NI Multisim keep SPICE tied to schematic wiring, so invalid or inconsistent model parameters still propagate into simulation results that can drive incorrect design decisions.
Expecting PCB integrity depth and advanced constraint-driven routing to match enterprise ECAD behavior
EasyEDA and DipTrace maintain integrated schematic-to-connector workflows, but their constraint management and signal integrity coverage are limited compared with specialist enterprise routing ecosystems.
Choosing a SPICE-first circuit tool and then forcing it into a full manufacturing packaging workflow
NI Multisim and CircuitLab provide schematic-connected simulation, but their PCB design rule check depth and manufacturing file breadth are narrower than dedicated ECAD PCB manufacturing workflows.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Siemens Xpedition, OrCAD X, Cadence Allegro X, Proteus, NI Multisim, Altium Designer, EasyEDA, LTspice, CircuitLab, and DipTrace using feature coverage for schematic connectivity synchronization, rule check and verification workflows, and SPICE-linked validation loops. Features accounted for 40% of the score, ease and setup fit accounted for 30% combined by balancing constraint configuration effort against day-to-day iteration speed, and value accounted for 30% by weighing workflow completeness for repeatable releases. Siemens Xpedition ranked highest because integrated connectivity-driven constraint evaluation kept schematic intent synchronized during PCB rule checking and because rule-driven DRC and ERC workflows reduced late-stage fix cycles during board spins.
Frequently Asked Questions About design circuit software
How does schematic-to-PCB connectivity stay synchronized in Siemens Xpedition, OrCAD X, and Allegro X?
When should a team choose Proteus over Altium Designer for circuit drafting with SPICE feedback?
Which toolchain best supports high-frequency board verification loops that rely on frequent electrical rule checking?
What tradeoff appears when using LTspice or CircuitLab instead of full ECAD stacks like Altium Designer?
Where does EasyEDA tend to fall short versus DipTrace when teams need heavier PCB rule governance?
How do manufacturing data outputs differ across OrCAD X, Altium Designer, and DipTrace?
What breaks if a team expects full PCB fabrication automation from NI Multisim or LTspice?
How do netlist-based workflows show up in DipTrace, EasyEDA, and OrCAD X during layout constraint checks?
When a design requires disciplined revisions across shared hardware libraries, which workflow fits best among Siemens Xpedition, Allegro X, and Altium Designer?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Manufacturing Engineering alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of manufacturing engineering tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare manufacturing engineering tools→