Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Control Printing Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Manufacturing Engineering

Top 10 Best Control Printing Software of 2026

Compare control printing software options for managing print jobs and devices, including Microsoft Universal Print and PrinterOn, with tradeoffs for teams.

21 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Control printing software governs print submission and release through centralized configuration, RBAC policies, and audit-log trails that reduce misprints and unmanaged device access. This comparison helps technical evaluators weigh driverless workflows, integration and API extensibility, and cost allocation options when selecting platforms such as ezeep for enterprise print control.

PrinterOn is the best overall for print teams that need cloud driven job intake and controlled pull release across locations because its cloud-to-queue authentication and availability workflow cuts down on misprints, while Microsoft Universal Print is the better pick if you want Entra ID governed printer provisioning without legacy print server upkeep.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

PrinterOn

Authentication backed job availability for pull style secure release, coordinated between cloud job intake and paired device queues.

Best for: Fits when a print team needs cloud driven job intake, controlled release, and API automation across locations.

2

Microsoft Universal Print

Editor pick

Cloud-first printer provisioning tied to Entra identity and managed access policies inside the Universal Print tenant.

Best for: Fits when print teams want Entra-driven printer governance without maintaining legacy print servers.

3

Pharos

Editor pick

Policy-driven secure release that coordinates authentication with queue permissions at job release time.

Best for: Fits when enterprise print governance needs secure release and allocation-aware accounting across sites.

Comparison Table

1
PrinterOnBest overall
enterprise
9.0/10
Overall
2
8.7/10
Overall
3
enterprise
8.6/10
Overall
4
8.3/10
Overall
5
8.2/10
Overall
6
7.7/10
Overall
7
7.4/10
Overall
8
7.2/10
Overall
9
6.8/10
Overall
10
6.7/10
Overall
#1

PrinterOn

enterprise

Cloud-based mobile and remote printing platform that controls print submission and release across locations.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Authentication backed job availability for pull style secure release, coordinated between cloud job intake and paired device queues.

PrinterOn focuses on cloud print access for distributed organizations, using a web and API driven job flow that routes print requests to managed devices. It supports pull style release through user authentication and secure job availability windows, which reduces accidental prints in shared venues.

Admin capabilities center on queue configuration, device pairing, and job tracking, with automation options through API endpoints for onboarding and job status. For print teams, the practical distinction is how PrinterOn combines cloud gateway ingestion with device side release controls rather than acting as a local print server replacement.

Pros
  • +API-first job submission and status checks fit automated print routing
  • +Secure pull release reduces misprints in shared printer environments
  • +Device provisioning supports pairing printers to managed endpoints
  • +Job tracking supports audit friendly operational visibility
Cons
  • –Release control depends on correct queue and authentication configuration
  • –Advanced accounting and cost allocation typically require integration work
Use scenarios
  • Libraries and public-service teams

    Mobile and visitor printing with governed release

    Governed printing for public users

  • IT for mobile workforce

    Remote BYOD printing to approved printers

    Less dependency on local drivers

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Campus IT and education teams

    Shared printer workflows for students

    Controlled access for campus users

    Students and visitors submit jobs remotely and release them using authentication-based controls at walk-up printers.

  • Enterprise multi-site print admins

    Consistent release rules across locations

    Consistent print access across sites

    Central configuration and job tracking help apply the same access and visibility expectations across distributed offices.

Best for: Fits when a print team needs cloud driven job intake, controlled release, and API automation across locations.

#2

Microsoft Universal Print

API-first

Cloud print infrastructure for centralized printer management and driverless printing.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Cloud-first printer provisioning tied to Entra identity and managed access policies inside the Universal Print tenant.

Microsoft Universal Print replaces print-server management by using cloud-backed provisioning and job handling built around the Universal Print service. It integrates with Microsoft Entra ID for user identity, policy-driven printer access, and job submission through a universal print driver and standards-based print paths.

Admin workflows center on tenant configuration, printer onboarding, and access controls that work across managed Windows clients and supported mobile or VDI scenarios. For secure release and accounting-style governance, it relies on partner ecosystems and job metadata capture rather than offering the full control-printing stack by itself.

Pros
  • +Entra ID-backed printer access control reduces local admin sprawl
  • +Universal Print driver simplifies deployment across mixed Windows endpoints
  • +Cloud provisioning supports adding and managing printers without dedicated print servers
  • +Job metadata in the cloud improves accounting and reporting via integrations
Cons
  • –Secure release workflows depend on external secure release tooling
  • –Quota enforcement and page-level accounting require additional configuration and add-ons
  • –Universal Print driver coverage can be limited for niche device models
  • –Onboarding printer connectors and network paths adds operational overhead
Use scenarios
  • Enterprise IT identity teams

    Printer access tied to Entra identities

    Identity-based printer access

  • IT operations for managed fleets

    Cloud onboarding for tenant printers

    Less print-server dependency

Show 1 more scenario
  • VDI and mobile print support

    Standardized job handling for VDI users

    More consistent user print experience

    Users submit jobs through a universal driver path while the service handles standardized job processing and access rules.

Best for: Fits when print teams want Entra-driven printer governance without maintaining legacy print servers.

#3

Pharos

enterprise

Enterprise print management software focused on secure printing, cost control, and analytics.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Policy-driven secure release that coordinates authentication with queue permissions at job release time.

Pharos manages print queues with policy enforcement so users can submit jobs and release them after authentication. The workflow supports secure release patterns used in regulated sites that restrict who can print and when. Print accounting and cost-center style allocation help teams track usage across sites and departments.

A key tradeoff is that policy coverage depends on consistent client behavior and queue wiring, so printer access may fail if endpoints are misconfigured. Pharos works best when administrators can standardize submission paths across office, VDI, and edge print scenarios to keep release rules aligned.

Pros
  • +Secure release tied to authentication and queue policies
  • +Print accounting oriented toward departments and allocation tracking
  • +Rule-based administration for controlled job submission paths
  • +Clear operational model for print release workflows
Cons
  • –Endpoint and queue configuration errors can block release
  • –Automation surface requires administrator scripting knowledge for depth
  • –Complex policy sets increase admin overhead during changes
Use scenarios
  • IT print operations teams

    Centralize release and access policies

    Fewer policy bypass incidents

  • Finance and cost accounting owners

    Track departmental print usage

    Tighter cost attribution

Show 1 more scenario
  • Security and compliance teams

    Restrict printing until verification

    Reduced exposure of unattended output

    Release gating keeps sensitive output from printing until user verification completes.

Best for: Fits when enterprise print governance needs secure release and allocation-aware accounting across sites.

#4

ezeep

SMB

Cloud printing software with centralized printer access control, driverless workflows, and secure release options.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Rule-driven printer routing combined with authenticated release, so jobs wait for a verified user action.

ezeep implements managed print release that fits office print rooms and departmental printer fleets where jobs must wait for a user action before output starts. It supports print queue management and job routing rules so teams can steer traffic toward approved printers instead of allowing direct device printing. Print accounting is built around job events so administrators can map prints back to users and groups for reporting and internal chargeback workflows.

Pros
  • +Managed release flow prevents unattended outputs at shared printers
  • +Print accounting captures job metadata for reporting and chargeback processes
  • +Queue routing rules steer jobs to approved printers and devices
  • +Policy configuration supports group-based control of printing targets
Cons
  • –Secure release depends on consistent identity integration across clients
  • –Advanced automation requires more admin work than basic rule setups
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Consolidate departmental printers with release control

    Fewer misdirected prints

  • Finance and admins

    Track printing by user and group

    Clear print cost visibility

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Security and compliance leads

    Reduce data exposure from unattended output

    Lower risk of document leakage

    Secure release stops immediate output and requires a verified interaction before pages print.

  • Workspace IT for VDI

    Standardize printing for redirected sessions

    Predictable printer selection

    Admin-defined routing and release behavior keep VDI printing consistent across user sessions.

Best for: Fits when mid-size teams need secure user release with accounting and controlled routing policies.

#5

Print Manager Plus

SMB

Print management software for tracking, quotas, cost recovery, and secure print release.

8.2/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Queue-side release rules that enforce authorization before jobs become printable.

Print Manager Plus fits teams that manage more than one print environment and need consistent controls for who can submit, where jobs route, and when jobs become printable. It provides administrative controls that align print release behavior with user authorization and job attributes. Monitoring and reporting support print accounting workflows so print teams can connect activity to users and devices.

Pros
  • +Centralized print release control across multiple printer groups
  • +Admin governance for job permissions and release behavior
  • +Print accounting visibility tied to user and device activity
  • +Queue-side management reduces dependence on client-side habits
Cons
  • –Queue and permission setup can take multiple iterations
  • –Limited flexibility for highly custom per-application routing
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Secure release across printer groups

    Fewer policy violations in release

  • Finance and cost accounting

    User-level print accounting reporting

    Cleaner cost center attribution

Show 1 more scenario
  • Security and compliance teams

    Governed print release for sensitive docs

    Reduced exposure of unattended jobs

    Release behavior is constrained by administrative rules instead of local printer access.

Best for: Fits when IT needs consistent secure release and print accounting across sites with shared policy.

#6

Vasion Print

SMB

Cloud print management for driver deployment, print routing, and secure release.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Secure release controls that tie job release behavior to authenticated identity and tracked job metadata.

Vasion Print is a control printing software option focused on job brokering, secure release workflows, and print accounting for mixed printer environments. It is built around a central service that can route jobs to the right queue, apply release rules tied to user identity, and track usage for cost center style reporting.

Pros
  • +Centralized job routing supports consistent queue selection across sites
  • +Secure release workflow reduces unattended print output risk
  • +Print accounting captures usage tied to users and destinations
  • +Automation hooks help wire release and status into enterprise workflows
Cons
  • –Driver and queue setup can require careful printer naming consistency
  • –Release policies depend on correct identity mapping for each user
Use scenarios
  • Security-conscious enterprises

    Hold sensitive jobs until release authorization

    Reduced accidental exposure

  • Windows infrastructure administrators

    Centralized control of print queues and drivers

    Centralized routine print administration

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Multi-site IT administrators

    Standardize printer provisioning across offices

    More consistent printer provisioning

    IT teams standardize queue configuration by discovering printers and applying consistent setup rules across locations.

  • Compliance and audit teams

    Audit who printed using job metadata

    Traceable print records

    Administrators retain job metadata to review which users printed and which devices handled specific jobs.

Best for: Fits when print teams need secure release and accounting with enterprise workflow integration.

#7

Tungsten Equitrac

enterprise

Enterprise print control software with accounting, secure release, and cost allocation.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Job release tied to managed identities and accounting output in the same control flow, reducing mismatches between what was printed and who released it.

Tungsten Equitrac is a control printing product focused on secure release and print accounting tied to managed identities. It routes jobs through policy, enabling badge or user-based release while tracking page and document usage for reporting.

Pros
  • +Secure release workflows with badge or user identity gating at job time
  • +Print accounting supports page and document level reporting for chargeback
  • +Centralized policy controls standardize driverless printing behavior across fleets
  • +Administrative configuration supports consistent release and routing rules per site
Cons
  • –Release and accounting depends on consistent identity mapping to job tickets
  • –Complex deployments require disciplined governance for device and driver onboarding
Use scenarios
  • Regulated organizations

    Controlled release for sensitive documents

    Fewer documents left behind

  • IT teams for shared offices

    Authentication before users collect prints

    Fewer unauthorized printouts

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Enterprise print operations

    Central governance across distributed fleets

    Consistent controls across sites

    Teams centralize release workflows and reporting to keep controls consistent across locations and devices.

  • Organizations managing print volume

    Quotas and policy enforcement for users

    More controlled output

    Rules manage print volume and access for users, departments, and multifunction devices using centralized policies.

Best for: Fits when mid-market and enterprise print fleets need secure release plus print accounting with centralized policy enforcement.

#8

Plus Technologies OM Plus

enterprise

Output management software providing print job control, routing, and delivery confirmation for enterprise print environments.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Workflow-based secure release tied to accounting allocation, so release permissions and reconciliation use the same job context.

Plus Technologies OM Plus manages control printing workflows by orchestrating job preparation, secure release, and post-print reconciliation for managed printer fleets. The software focuses on print accounting and job routing controls that map print activity to organizational units and operational targets.

Pros
  • +Tight workflow control for secure release and operator handoff
  • +Print accounting support links jobs to organizational allocations
  • +Job routing rules reduce reliance on manual queue selection
  • +Operational visibility through job tracking and activity logs
Cons
  • –Configuration depth increases time needed for first deployment
  • –Advanced release behaviors depend on consistent queue naming and setup
  • –Integration work can be required to align with existing print infrastructure
  • –Reporting requires admin attention to keep allocations accurate
Use scenarios
  • Enterprise operations teams

    Route invoices and reports to destinations

    Less manual document handling

  • Print and IT administrators

    Held jobs released through controlled workflows

    Better access control for users

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Print operations teams

    Handle exceptions and reroute delivery paths

    Less manual intervention during failures

    Admins manage held jobs and unavailable queues and switch to alternate delivery paths during printer state changes.

  • Finance and compliance governance

    Chargeback reporting by user and device

    Audit-oriented usage totals

    Finance and compliance teams attribute pages and jobs to users, devices, departments, or fleets for reporting.

Best for: Fits when print operations need controlled release and accounting with governance for shared printer pools.

#9

Xerox Workplace Suite

enterprise

Print management software for secure release, mobile printing, and print administration.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Centralized management of print release and job handling policies across Xerox fleet configurations.

Xerox Workplace Suite coordinates print control features around centralized management of output workflows and document release. It supports administration for device groups, user access, and job handling rules that map users to printers and policies across fleets.

Pros
  • +Centralized workflow management across mixed Xerox device fleets
  • +Role-based access options for limiting who can release and manage jobs
  • +Operational reporting that ties job activity to user and device groups
  • +Policy-driven routing rules that reduce manual printer selection
Cons
  • –Control outcomes depend heavily on surrounding authentication and directory alignment
  • –Advanced automation requires careful configuration across servers and device settings
  • –Limited breadth of non-Xerox device coverage in mixed environments
  • –Integration effort rises when print release workflows span multiple job entry points
Use scenarios
  • Print governance and compliance teams

    User-to-printer policy mapping for releases

    More controlled document release

  • Print operations managers

    Monitor fleet activity by user and job context

    Better visibility into print activity

Best for: Fits when print teams standardize on Xerox devices and need centralized job policies with strong administrative oversight.

#10

Ricoh Streamline NX

enterprise

Print fleet management with secure printing, accounting, and document workflow controls.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.7/10
Standout feature

Secure release and queue policy enforcement designed to work with Ricoh print workflows, reducing release bypass risks.

Ricoh Streamline NX targets print teams that need control around where print jobs go and when users can release them. It centers on secure release workflow, print queue management, and print accounting integrations tied to organizational policies.

Pros
  • +Secure release workflow control for managed print devices
  • +Print accounting integration supports chargeback style reporting
  • +Administration tooling fits organizations with multiple sites
  • +Consistent policy enforcement across managed queues
Cons
  • –Integration depth can depend on the surrounding Ricoh print stack
  • –Advanced automation requires careful queue and policy design
  • –Driver coverage gaps can appear on non-Ricoh device fleets
  • –Reporting granularity may be limited without supplemental configuration
Use scenarios
  • IT for confidential office printing

    Secure pull printing until authenticated release

    Reduced unattended output

  • Organizations with shared multifunction devices

    Authenticated walk-up document release

    Controlled walk-up printing

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Distributed IT workplace operations

    Remote job routing to centrally managed fleets

    Centralized control of remote printing

    Submitted jobs are routed and managed across centrally administered printer fleets and remote devices.

  • Security-focused enterprise IT

    Centralized queue and release policy enforcement

    Consistent print governance

    Admins apply centralized rules for queues, user access, release behavior, and output handling across supported locations.

Best for: Fits when print teams must enforce secure release and accounting across multi-queue device fleets.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 control printing software, PrinterOn stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
PrinterOn

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Control Printing Software

How do ezeep and Print Manager Plus differ in where release policy is enforced in the print path?
ezeep enforces routing and authenticated release around verified user interaction at the release point, then records activity for accounting. Print Manager Plus focuses on queue-side authorization so jobs stay unprintable until permissions match at release time.
Which tool connects better for automation when print workflows must move job state across systems through APIs?
PrinterOn is built around web and API driven job flow for cloud intake and pull style secure release through paired device queues. Vasion Print also provides integration points to move jobs and status between systems, but its core is centralized job brokering and release control rather than cloud gateway ingestion.
When teams need Entra-based identity for printer access and job submission, which option fits best?
Microsoft Universal Print ties printer provisioning and access policy to Entra ID inside the Universal Print tenant. Tungsten Equitrac provides managed identity tied to job release and accounting, but it does not replace Universal Print’s Entra-centric provisioning model.
How does Pharos handle secure release and accounting mapping to departments at release time?
Pharos coordinates authentication with queue permissions at the moment of job release, then applies print rules that align job access with user and department context. Its administration model ties release behavior and accounting signals so reconciliation uses the same policy-driven job context.
What breaks if a print environment requires badge release but uses only authentication-free queue permissions?
Plus Technologies OM Plus relies on workflow rules that connect secure release with accounting allocation, so bypassing identity-based controls undermines reconciliation accuracy. Ricoh Streamline NX is designed around secure release and queue policy enforcement at scale, so removing identity checks increases release bypass risk.
Where does PrinterOn fall short compared with full control-printing stacks like Ricoh Streamline NX for on-prem governance?
PrinterOn’s cloud gateway ingestion and pull style release are strong for distributed intake, but it does not replace full control-printing governance across multi-queue device fleets in the same way Ricoh Streamline NX does. Streamline NX targets queue policy and secure release enforcement across multiple devices and print servers with accounting integration.
How do data migration and job reconciliation differ between OM Plus and Xerox Workplace Suite during cutover?
Plus Technologies OM Plus centers reconciliation after job processing, using workflow rules and job context to align accounting outputs with the governed release flow. Xerox Workplace Suite shifts focus to centralized output workflow management and monitoring, so reconciliation quality depends on how existing authentication sources and device groups map into its user and policy model.
What admin controls matter most when access must be limited by device groups and user mappings?
Xerox Workplace Suite provides administration for device groups and user access plus job handling rules that map users to printers and policies across fleets. Print Manager Plus also emphasizes centralized permission consistency across printer types, but it prioritizes queue-side secure release authorization over fleet-wide Xerox device group governance.
How does Tungsten Equitrac’s job context reduce mismatches between who released a job and what got printed?
Tungsten Equitrac ties job release behavior to managed identities within the same control flow used for page and document accounting. That design reduces gaps between release events and accounting outputs because the release and reporting share the same identity-bound job metadata.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Control Printing Software

We see the biggest differences in how a control printing software product handles RBAC, job data capture, and API-driven workflows around print release and reporting. Your choice should come down to how deeply it integrates with your print paths while staying inspectable during everyday operations.

RBAC for print release control

Why it matters

RBAC for print release control matters because the right people need the right permissions at the moment a job is authorized. It also reduces “who changed what” confusion during audits and handoffs.

How to check

In a demo, ask to create two roles—one that can release jobs and one that can only view status. Then attempt a release as the limited role and confirm the system blocks it and logs the attempt.

Release workflow options for jobs

Why it matters

Release workflow options determine whether teams can match how work actually happens, from manual approval to device- or user-triggered release. This directly affects throughput and mistakes when jobs sit waiting.

How to check

Run a sample job through the configured flow and try at least two release paths offered by the product. Ask what happens if a job is partially released, canceled, or retried after a failed release action.

Job metadata and data model control

Why it matters

Control printing relies on job metadata to keep purpose, owner, and destination consistent. If the data model is too rigid, you end up with missing fields or broken reports.

How to check

Request a configuration where you add custom fields (for example, department and form type) and confirm they appear in the job list and exports. Then verify the fields remain attached after the job is released and retried.

Automation and API surface for print ops

Why it matters

Automation and API surface is what lets IT and admins connect print approvals, notifications, and status checks to existing workflows. Without it, teams rely on manual steps and inconsistent data capture.

How to check

Ask for the exact automation methods supported—webhooks, REST calls, or scripted actions. In the demo, trigger a job state change and confirm you can capture the update programmatically (not just in the UI).

Audit log detail for release actions

Why it matters

Audit log detail for release actions matters when you need to explain what happened to a job and who approved it. Shallow logs slow down incident review and increase rework during governance checks.

How to check

After a release and a blocked attempt, open the audit log view and confirm you see timestamp, actor, job identifier, and action outcome. Ask whether you can export logs and filter by user, job, or time window.

Provisioning and configuration lifecycle control

Why it matters

Provisioning and configuration lifecycle control impacts how safely you roll out changes to release rules, roles, and required job fields. Weak lifecycle tools lead to surprise behavior on print days.

How to check

Ask how configuration changes are staged and applied, then test a change to required fields and observe what happens to in-flight jobs. Confirm how quickly new rules take effect and whether prior jobs keep their original rules.

Red flags

  • RBAC feels cosmetic, since releases work even with restricted roles.
  • Job fields disappear after release or retries, making reporting inconsistent.
  • Audit logs show timestamps but not who took the action or what changed.

Fit by situation

  • If you run approvals across multiple departments, prioritize RBAC for print release control.
  • If your teams must release jobs through different real-world paths, focus on release workflow options for jobs.
  • If you need to connect print actions to existing systems, prioritize Automation and API surface for print ops.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.