GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Marketing AdvertisingTop 10 Best Content Curation Software of 2026
Discover top tools to streamline content curation.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Feedly
Topic discovery and saved collections with cross-source filtering for curated reading
Built for content teams curating ongoing research streams and shared topic collections.
Curata
Curata curation workflow with topic-driven recommendations and editorial approval
Built for marketing teams building repeatable topic-based curation programs.
Scoop.it
Scoop.it topic curation boards with manual editorial control and publishing
Built for marketing teams publishing topic collections without building custom workflows.
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates content curation software such as Feedly, Curata, Scoop.it, Pocket, BuzzSumo, and additional tools used to discover, organize, and share web content. Readers get a side-by-side view of core features, workflow fit, and common use cases so tool selection matches content sourcing needs and publishing goals.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feedly Aggregates RSS and social sources into topic-based feeds and lets teams clip, tag, and publish curated articles. | content aggregation | 8.5/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.9/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 2 | Curata Uses AI-assisted topic discovery to help marketing teams find, score, and publish curated content in campaigns. | AI curation | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 3 | Scoop.it Creates topic pages by collecting and organizing web content and provides editing workflows for publishing curated posts. | topic pages | 7.2/10 | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 4 | Pocket Saves articles and webpages for later discovery and supports sharing and collection organization for curation workflows. | save-and-curate | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 5 | BuzzSumo Finds high-performing content by topic and competitor and supports curation workflows around trending and relevant articles. | content discovery | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.1/10 | 6.7/10 |
| 6 | Meltwater Combines media monitoring and analytics to surface relevant content and deliver curated insights for marketing teams. | media intelligence | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.3/10 |
| 7 | Brandwatch Detects and analyzes conversations so marketing teams can identify content themes and compile curated reporting for campaigns. | social intelligence | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 8 | Mention Monitors brand and topic mentions across the web so teams can collect relevant posts into curation-ready lists. | web monitoring | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 9 | Nuzzel Builds social and link insights from team and network activity and helps curate relevant reads into shareable updates. | social curation | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 | 8.1/10 | 6.6/10 |
| 10 | ContentStudio Curates content from feeds and sources into organized queues with scheduling and publishing tools for marketing teams. | social scheduling | 7.3/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.7/10 |
Aggregates RSS and social sources into topic-based feeds and lets teams clip, tag, and publish curated articles.
Uses AI-assisted topic discovery to help marketing teams find, score, and publish curated content in campaigns.
Creates topic pages by collecting and organizing web content and provides editing workflows for publishing curated posts.
Saves articles and webpages for later discovery and supports sharing and collection organization for curation workflows.
Finds high-performing content by topic and competitor and supports curation workflows around trending and relevant articles.
Combines media monitoring and analytics to surface relevant content and deliver curated insights for marketing teams.
Detects and analyzes conversations so marketing teams can identify content themes and compile curated reporting for campaigns.
Monitors brand and topic mentions across the web so teams can collect relevant posts into curation-ready lists.
Builds social and link insights from team and network activity and helps curate relevant reads into shareable updates.
Curates content from feeds and sources into organized queues with scheduling and publishing tools for marketing teams.
Feedly
content aggregationAggregates RSS and social sources into topic-based feeds and lets teams clip, tag, and publish curated articles.
Topic discovery and saved collections with cross-source filtering for curated reading
Feedly stands out for turning RSS and social sources into a fast, browseable reading stream with strong organization controls. It supports topic-based discovery, saved items, and multiple feed views that keep curation workflows moving from scan to collection. Feedly also offers collaboration features like shared spaces and team visibility for curated content sets. Its core strength remains source aggregation plus lightweight editorial workflow for ongoing content research.
Pros
- Fast RSS and social feed ingestion with smooth browsing and filtering
- Topic discovery helps expand sources without manual list building
- Saved collections and tags make ongoing curation easy to organize
Cons
- Advanced workflow automation remains limited versus dedicated editorial tools
- Team review and approvals are not as robust as full CMS review pipelines
- Source curation can feel management heavy once feeds grow large
Best For
Content teams curating ongoing research streams and shared topic collections
Curata
AI curationUses AI-assisted topic discovery to help marketing teams find, score, and publish curated content in campaigns.
Curata curation workflow with topic-driven recommendations and editorial approval
Curata differentiates itself with guided content discovery and curated publishing workflows built for marketers and editors. The platform centers on topic-based recommendation, content sourcing, and editorial review so teams can create repeatable curation programs. Curata also supports collaboration and syndication-style output through publishing and integration options. Strong governance shows up in how it organizes research, drafts, and approval steps for ongoing campaigns.
Pros
- Guided curation workflow from sourcing to draft and approval
- Topic and audience centric recommendations for faster shortlists
- Library organization supports reusable collections and recurring campaigns
- Collaboration tools keep editorial decisions traceable
Cons
- Learning curve exists for building effective topic and rules setups
- Customization of publishing formats can feel limited versus full CMS control
- Automation flexibility depends on the curated workflow model
Best For
Marketing teams building repeatable topic-based curation programs
Scoop.it
topic pagesCreates topic pages by collecting and organizing web content and provides editing workflows for publishing curated posts.
Scoop.it topic curation boards with manual editorial control and publishing
Scoop.it stands out with topic-focused content curation pages built around curated collections and RSS-style discovery. It supports adding sources, filtering and organizing posts into themes, and publishing curated boards to a web page for reuse and sharing. The workflow emphasizes editorial assembly with lightweight collaboration and manual curation controls rather than deep automation or analytics.
Pros
- Topic pages turn curated links into shareable editorial collections
- RSS and source following help populate curations from existing feeds
- Curation boards support organization by topic and quick publishing
Cons
- Automation depth is limited compared with workflow-first curation tools
- Analytics are basic for audience and engagement attribution
- Collaboration and governance features lag behind enterprise curation suites
Best For
Marketing teams publishing topic collections without building custom workflows
Saves articles and webpages for later discovery and supports sharing and collection organization for curation workflows.
Browser and mobile web clipper that saves pages for offline-style later reading
Pocket stands out for capturing articles and pages across mobile and desktop and storing them for later reading. It supports tag-based organization and a searchable library so curated items stay easy to revisit. Built-in recommendations can surface saved-content categories inside the app, turning personal saves into ongoing discovery. Readability-focused views reduce clutter so content can be consumed with minimal formatting noise.
Pros
- One-tap save from browser and mobile apps keeps curation friction very low
- Tagging plus search makes large reading libraries navigable
- Read-later mode shows cleaner layouts than typical web pages
Cons
- Curation workflows lack multi-user collaboration and approval paths
- No native publishing or content syndication for curated collections
- Limited automation options beyond tags, highlights, and manual saves
Best For
Individuals curating articles for later reading with lightweight organization
BuzzSumo
content discoveryFinds high-performing content by topic and competitor and supports curation workflows around trending and relevant articles.
Content Alerts that monitor topics and competitors for newly published high-performing pages
BuzzSumo stands out for connecting content discovery with engagement signals like social shares and link mentions. It supports researching competitors and topics, then filters results by platform and recency to narrow curation quickly. The workflow centers on finding high-performing pages and exporting lists for publishing research and outreach planning.
Pros
- Topic and competitor search surfaces high-engagement content across networks
- Filters by platform and recency reduce irrelevant results fast
- Exportable lists support repeatable curation workflows
- Content alerts help track new posts for specific topics
Cons
- Advanced filtering and projects can feel complex for smaller teams
- Content scoring relies heavily on engagement signals, not intent or quality
- Collaboration and in-workspace publishing workflow are limited
- Sorting across many sources can require manual cleanup
Best For
Marketing teams curating content using engagement data and competitor research
Meltwater
media intelligenceCombines media monitoring and analytics to surface relevant content and deliver curated insights for marketing teams.
Topic dashboards with saved searches for continuous monitoring and curation
Meltwater stands out for turning web, social, and news signals into curated intelligence for marketing and communications teams. It supports saved searches and dashboards that help track topics, brands, and competitors while surfacing relevant stories and engagement context. Content curation is strengthened by workflow-friendly exports and collaboration options that reduce time spent manually collecting sources.
Pros
- Strong cross-channel discovery across news, web, and social content
- Saved queries and topic dashboards keep curation consistent over time
- Actionable export options support downstream reporting and sharing
Cons
- Curating large keyword sets can feel noisy without tight filters
- Setup takes time to tune queries for reliable relevance
- Collaboration and governance features are not as streamlined as niche curators
Best For
Marketing and comms teams needing ongoing cross-channel content curation
Brandwatch
social intelligenceDetects and analyzes conversations so marketing teams can identify content themes and compile curated reporting for campaigns.
Brandwatch Discover plus Audiences insights for refining curated topics by engagement and demographic signals
Brandwatch stands out with its consumer intelligence foundation that feeds content curation, not just generic feeds. The platform combines social listening, real-time topic tracking, and audience signals to surface actionable themes for editorial workflows. Curated outputs can be organized through projects and shared with stakeholders using dashboards and reporting views. Stronger curation results come from tying discovery to trends, engagement patterns, and brand-specific context.
Pros
- Integrates listening, trend detection, and audience context for better curation inputs
- Projects and dashboards help teams organize and review curated selections
- Advanced query building supports precise topic and sentiment scoping
Cons
- Curation setup can be complex for teams without analytics workflows
- Editorial filtering and governance tools feel heavier than simple feed managers
- Many useful capabilities require time to configure and tune
Best For
Marketing and insights teams curating content from brand and audience signals
Mention
web monitoringMonitors brand and topic mentions across the web so teams can collect relevant posts into curation-ready lists.
Real-time mention and keyword monitoring streams with saved filters
Mention stands out with real-time social listening that captures brand and keyword mentions and routes them into curated workflows. Core capabilities include stream filtering, saved searches, engagement views, and alert-driven monitoring designed around recurring discovery. It also supports collaboration by letting teams share curated streams and act on items without building custom ingestion pipelines. The emphasis remains on ongoing source monitoring and prioritization more than on long-form editorial publishing.
Pros
- Real-time mention streams for fast detection and curation
- Saved searches and filters reduce manual scanning work
- Team views support shared monitoring and quicker responses
Cons
- Curation is strongest for monitoring, not for editorial publishing
- Complex filter setups can feel heavy for newcomers
- Multi-source refinement takes repeated tuning for best results
Best For
Teams curating social discovery and prioritizing mentions across keywords
Nuzzel
social curationBuilds social and link insights from team and network activity and helps curate relevant reads into shareable updates.
Network-driven trending feed that highlights links shared by connected people
Nuzzel focuses on turning a user’s network signals into a readable stream of trending links. It consolidates content sharing activity from people connected to users and surfaces what is getting shared most. The workflow emphasizes lightweight discovery and sharing rather than building complex editorial pipelines. It works best as a personal or team feed for curating what matters across social and professional connections.
Pros
- Network-based trending feed surfaces relevant links faster than generic discovery
- Clear, link-first cards make browsing and quick curation straightforward
- Easy sharing of curated items supports lightweight team workflows
Cons
- Curation depth is limited versus tools with robust publishing and workflows
- Discovery quality depends heavily on connection signals and sharing behavior
- Export and governance features are less comprehensive than dedicated editorial platforms
Best For
Teams needing fast network-driven link discovery and lightweight curation
ContentStudio
social schedulingCurates content from feeds and sources into organized queues with scheduling and publishing tools for marketing teams.
Auto queue and scheduling from a curated content library to social channels
ContentStudio focuses on turning saved content into scheduled social posts with a workflow that spans discovery, curation, and publishing. The tool supports bulk content imports, topic-based content sources, and team collaboration around drafts and approvals. ContentStudio also includes analytics for content and engagement so curation decisions can be refined. The strongest fit is teams that want repeatable curation-to-publishing operations rather than manual bookmarking and one-off posting.
Pros
- End-to-end curation to scheduled posting workflow
- Bulk import and topic sources for faster content gathering
- Team collaboration supports drafts and approval-style workflows
- Built-in social analytics ties engagement back to curation
Cons
- Curation depth can feel limited versus dedicated research tools
- Workflow setup across sources and channels can be time-consuming
- Advanced governance options are not as strong as enterprise platforms
- Automation flexibility can be constrained for complex editorial rules
Best For
Marketing teams curating content for multi-channel social publishing at scale
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 marketing advertising, Feedly stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Content Curation Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to choose Content Curation Software using real workflow signals from Feedly, Curata, Scoop.it, Pocket, BuzzSumo, Meltwater, Brandwatch, Mention, Nuzzel, and ContentStudio. It maps tool capabilities like topic discovery, editorial approvals, and scheduling into clear selection criteria for marketing, comms, and individual use cases. It also lists common pitfalls like weak governance and limited automation so teams can avoid buying the wrong curation style.
What Is Content Curation Software?
Content Curation Software aggregates content from feeds, searches, and social signals then organizes items into collections for review and reuse. It reduces time spent scanning by converting discovery sources into saved libraries, topic queues, and shareable topic pages. Many teams use these tools to collect research for campaigns, assemble curated boards, or publish scheduled social posts. Feedly shows how source aggregation plus saved collections supports ongoing research streams. Curata shows how guided discovery plus editorial approval supports repeatable marketing curation programs.
Key Features to Look For
Curation teams need these capabilities because discovery, organization, and downstream output each fail in different ways across tools.
Topic discovery and cross-source filtering
Look for systems that expand sources by topic and filter across multiple inputs so curation remains consistent as volume grows. Feedly excels with topic discovery and cross-source filtering on saved collections to keep reading streams navigable. Meltwater adds topic dashboards with saved searches that support continuous monitoring across news, web, and social signals.
Saved collections with tagging and searchable libraries
A durable curation system depends on fast retrieval of prior selections when building new briefs or campaigns. Feedly provides saved collections and tags for ongoing curation organization. Pocket adds tag-based organization plus searchable saved items, and its readable viewing mode reduces clutter during review.
Guided editorial workflow with approvals
Teams that ship curated work need an editorial path from sourcing to draft to approval. Curata supports a curation workflow with topic-driven recommendations plus editorial approval steps that keep decisions traceable. ContentStudio supports drafts and approval-style collaboration around curated content queues for scheduled social posting.
Publishing outputs built for curated pages or scheduled posts
Choose tools that match the final deliverable so curated work does not get rebuilt in a separate CMS toolchain. Scoop.it focuses on topic curation boards that publish curated content to web pages for reuse and sharing. ContentStudio focuses on auto queues and scheduling so curated items become scheduled social posts.
Monitoring streams tied to mentions and high-signal alerts
If the goal is to catch what matters quickly, tool-supported monitoring prevents manual scanning and reduces missed opportunities. Mention delivers real-time mention and keyword monitoring streams with saved filters for prioritization. BuzzSumo delivers Content Alerts that track topics and competitors for newly published high-performing pages.
Audience and trend intelligence to refine curation relevance
When relevance depends on brand context and audience behavior, curation needs intelligence beyond keyword matching. Brandwatch ties discovery to trends, engagement patterns, and brand-specific context using projects and dashboards. Brandwatch Discover plus Audiences insights help refine curated topics by engagement and demographic signals.
How to Choose the Right Content Curation Software
Selection should start by matching the tool’s strongest workflow stage to the actual curation job being performed each week.
Start with the content sources that must feed curation
Pick Feedly when the workflow starts from RSS and social sources and the priority is fast browsing with filtering inside topic-based feeds. Pick Mention when the workflow starts from real-time brand and keyword mentions that must be surfaced quickly with saved filters. Pick Nuzzel when the workflow starts from network activity and shared links and the priority is lightweight discovery through network-driven trending.
Confirm the organization model matches how collections are built
Choose Feedly when shared topic collections and tags drive ongoing research streams for a team. Choose Pocket when individuals need a low-friction clip-to-library flow with tagging and search to revisit saved items later. Choose Scoop.it when publishing topic pages matters because its boards organize posts into themes for reuse and sharing.
Map your editorial governance needs to workflow strength
Select Curata when curation must move through guided sourcing, draft building, and editorial approval steps with topic-driven recommendations. Select ContentStudio when collaboration must center on drafts and approval-style workflows tied directly to scheduling and publishing. Avoid relying on Pocket or Nuzzel for multi-user approvals because both focus on lightweight discovery and organization rather than editorial publishing pipelines.
Match output requirements to the tool’s publishing capabilities
Choose Scoop.it when the output is a shareable topic page built from curated collections with manual editorial control. Choose ContentStudio when the output is scheduled social publishing that pulls from a curated content library into queues. Choose BuzzSumo when exportable lists and content alerts support downstream research planning and outreach rather than in-tool publishing.
Validate how relevance is improved without excessive tuning
Choose Meltwater when continuous relevance depends on saved queries and topic dashboards that consolidate web, social, and news signals into curation-ready monitoring. Choose Brandwatch when relevance depends on trend and audience context using advanced query building and projects and dashboards. Choose Mention when the value is speed from real-time streams and saved filters without needing deep editorial setup.
Who Needs Content Curation Software?
Content curation software fits different teams depending on whether curation is research intake, editorial publishing, social scheduling, or continuous monitoring.
Content teams curating ongoing research streams and shared topic collections
Feedly is a strong fit because it aggregates RSS and social sources into topic-based feeds plus provides saved collections and tags for ongoing organization. Feedly also supports collaboration through shared spaces and team visibility for curated content sets.
Marketing teams building repeatable topic-based curation programs
Curata fits teams that need guided sourcing plus topic-driven recommendations and editorial approval workflows for campaigns. Curata’s library organization supports reusable collections and recurring campaign execution with traceable collaboration decisions.
Marketing teams publishing topic collections without building custom workflows
Scoop.it is built around topic curation boards with manual editorial control and publishing to shareable topic pages. Its emphasis on topic pages and RSS-style discovery makes it well-suited for assembling themed collections quickly.
Marketing teams curating content for multi-channel social publishing at scale
ContentStudio matches teams that want curation tied directly to scheduled social posting with auto queue and scheduling from a curated library. It also supports team collaboration with drafts and approval-style workflows and includes social analytics to refine curation decisions.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Most buying failures come from choosing a tool that is strong at discovery but weak at governance, publishing, or workflow repeatability.
Buying a discovery-only tool when approvals are required
Pocket focuses on saving and organizing for later reading and it does not provide multi-user collaboration and approval paths for curated collections. Mention is strongest for monitoring and prioritization and it emphasizes curation for social discovery rather than editorial publishing governance.
Expecting deep editorial automation from feed managers and boards
Feedly delivers fast browsing and organization but advanced workflow automation remains limited compared with dedicated editorial tools. Scoop.it supports topic boards and publishing with manual editorial control but automation depth is limited compared with workflow-first curation platforms.
Using engagement-score discovery without controlling for intent
BuzzSumo uses content scoring based heavily on engagement signals like social shares and link mentions, which can produce lists that do not align to content intent. BuzzSumo also limits in-workspace publishing workflow and multi-source sorting can require manual cleanup as projects expand.
Choosing monitoring dashboards without planning for query tuning
Meltwater can become noisy when keyword sets are large without tight filters and setup takes time to tune queries for reliable relevance. Brandwatch is powerful for audience and trend refinement but curation setup can feel complex and requires time to configure and tune.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated each tool on three sub-dimensions. Features had a weight of 0.4. Ease of use had a weight of 0.3. Value had a weight of 0.3. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Feedly separated from lower-ranked tools by combining a strong features score with high ease of use through topic discovery plus saved collections and cross-source filtering that keep the browsing to curation loop fast.
Frequently Asked Questions About Content Curation Software
Which content curation tool is best for RSS and multi-source browsing at speed?
Feedly is built for fast scanning across RSS and social sources with multiple feed views and topic-based discovery. It also keeps curation moving through saved items and lightweight editorial organization for ongoing research.
Which tool is strongest for repeatable topic-driven editorial workflows with approvals?
Curata fits teams that run ongoing campaigns with topic-based recommendations, drafting, and approval steps. Its governance model organizes research, drafts, and review so curated outputs follow a consistent editorial workflow.
What tool helps teams publish curated collections as reusable topic pages?
Scoop.it focuses on assembling topic-centered collections and publishing curated boards to a web page. It supports adding sources, filtering into themes, and manual editorial control designed for publishing curated page sets.
Which option is best for capturing and tagging content for later review and offline-style reading?
Pocket is optimized for capture and retrieval across mobile and desktop through a browser and mobile web clipper. Its tag-based organization and searchable library keep saved items easy to revisit, and readability-focused views reduce formatting noise.
Which tools connect curation to engagement metrics for finding high-performing content?
BuzzSumo ties content discovery to engagement signals like social shares and link mentions, then helps filter by platform and recency. Meltwater and Brandwatch also support research-driven curation using saved searches and dashboarding that surface relevant stories with context.
How do monitoring-first tools compare for social mentions and brand tracking?
Mention is built around real-time keyword and brand mentions with stream filtering, saved searches, and alert-driven monitoring. Brandwatch goes broader by combining social listening with audience and trend signals, which helps route discovery into project-based curation and stakeholder reporting views.
Which tool is best for network-driven link discovery without building an editorial pipeline?
Nuzzel emphasizes a readable stream of trending links derived from connected people’s sharing activity. Its workflow stays lightweight by prioritizing what the network is sharing most rather than requiring deep ingestion rules.
Which platform is best when curation must directly flow into scheduled publishing on social channels?
ContentStudio is designed for the full curation-to-publishing chain by importing content into a curated library, drafting for teams, and scheduling bulk social posts. It also supports analytics so curation decisions can be refined based on engagement outcomes.
Which tool supports continuous cross-channel collection with dashboards and exports for workflows?
Meltwater supports saved searches and topic dashboards that keep monitoring ongoing web, news, and social signals. It also strengthens workflows with collaboration options and exports so teams spend less time manually collecting sources.
What are common technical setup requirements when moving from manual bookmarking to a curation workflow?
Feedly requires setting up and organizing RSS and social sources into topic-based collections and saved items for structured browsing. Curata and Scoop.it require defining sourcing and editorial stages, while ContentStudio and Pocket focus on capture into libraries with tags, drafts, or saved collections before those items move into a publishing workflow.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Marketing Advertising alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of marketing advertising tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare marketing advertising tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.