GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Education LearningTop 10 Best Computer Training Software of 2026
Top 10 computer training software ranked by course features and admin tools. Comparison of TalentLMS, Moodle, and Docebo options.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
TalentLMS (talentlms-1) is the best pick for department-scale training teams that need reliable course assignments plus SCORM and xAPI tracking, whereas Moodle (moodle-2) fits when you want deeper governance and assessment reuse with standards-based content intake.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
TalentLMS
xAPI statement capture with an LRS integration pattern for detailed learning event reporting.
Built for fits when department-scale teams need course assignments plus SCORM and xAPI tracking..
Moodle
Editor pickAdvanced role and capability controls let administrators restrict specific actions across courses, activities, and grading workflows.
Built for fits when training teams need configurable LMS governance, assessment reuse, and standards-based content intake..
Docebo
Editor pickAutomation that triggers enrollments, assignments, and learning journeys based on learner events and status changes.
Built for fits when enterprise training teams need automated assignments and governed learner experiences..
Related reading
Comparison Table
TalentLMS
SMBCloud LMS software for employee, customer, and partner training with course authoring and tracking.
xAPI statement capture with an LRS integration pattern for detailed learning event reporting.
TalentLMS fits teams that need fast LMS deployment with structured learner tracking across courses, sessions, and credentials. Learner progress is visible through assignment completion and a transcript view that reflects course outcomes and, for xAPI activity, recorded statements.
A key tradeoff appears in advanced interoperability needs, since deeper enterprise integrations often require external automation around APIs rather than fully built-in workflows. TalentLMS works well for department-scale rollout where governance is handled through groups and admin roles, and where SCORM content import is the primary publishing path.
- +SCORM package import supports structured training content delivery
- +xAPI activity collection enables statement-level learning analytics
- +Groups and assignments simplify role-scoped training rollouts
- +Certification tracking turns course completion into credential workflows
- –Complex enterprise automation can require API-driven external orchestration
- –Very large content catalogs may need careful course and group organization
- –Some governance scenarios depend on admin role setup discipline
- –Multi-system reporting beyond core transcripts can require integrations
HR enablement teams
Run onboarding pathways with certifications
Consistent onboarding completion tracking
Corporate training admins
Maintain SCORM course catalogs
Lower admin time per release
Show 2 more scenarios
Learning analytics owners
Capture behavior-level learning events
Richer training performance insights
Collect xAPI statements to analyze learning activity beyond completion.
IT security training leads
Document compliance completion evidence
Auditable learner completion views
Use transcript-based reporting tied to training assignments and certifications.
Best for: Fits when department-scale teams need course assignments plus SCORM and xAPI tracking.
More related reading
Moodle
enterpriseLearning platform software for online training, course management, assessments, and learner progress tracking.
Advanced role and capability controls let administrators restrict specific actions across courses, activities, and grading workflows.
Moodle provides an assessment engine with quizzes, question bank reuse, timed attempts, and gradebook workflows that can publish outcomes to learners. SCORM package import supports common sequencing behaviors inside Moodle course modules, while external tracking can be extended through LRS style xAPI integrations. Integration depth is strong because Moodle exposes REST endpoints for external systems and supports LTI based interactions with third-party tools for learning activities.
A tradeoff appears in governance workload because large deployments need consistent role design, course template conventions, and plugin governance to avoid admin drift. Moodle fits organizations migrating legacy courseware and building blended learning paths that require repeatable templates, structured rubrics, and transcript grade history over time.
- +Quizzes with reusable question banks support repeatable assessment design
- +Role and capability permissions control activity level access and grading actions
- +REST endpoints support external enrollment, content sync, and grade retrieval
- +SCORM imports enable reuse of existing packaged e learning content
- –Plugin governance is required to keep permissions and behavior consistent
- –Complex permission setups can slow new admin onboarding
- –High concurrency can require tuning of caching and database indexing
- –Some advanced proctoring workflows depend on add ons or integrations
Corporate L&D teams
Standardize recurring training cohorts
More consistent learning outcomes
Compliance training owners
Track completion through gradebook
Clear learner transcript history
Show 2 more scenarios
System integration teams
Sync learning data to external tools
Reduced manual training ops
Use REST endpoints to provision users, read activity outcomes, and connect external portals.
Instructional designers
Reuse packaged e learning modules
Faster content republishing
Import SCORM packages and embed them into structured course sequences with module level reporting.
Best for: Fits when training teams need configurable LMS governance, assessment reuse, and standards-based content intake.
Docebo
enterpriseEnterprise learning platform for internal and external training with automation, analytics, and content delivery.
Automation that triggers enrollments, assignments, and learning journeys based on learner events and status changes.
Docebo is built around managing large learning programs, including ILT scheduling, self-paced courseware, and certification tracking tied to completion history. Automation rules can enroll learners, assign learning activities, and route completion outcomes into downstream processes such as internal reporting and skill governance. Admin controls include role-based permissions for managing course catalogs, user operations, and reporting access.
A notable tradeoff is that automation and governance need deliberate configuration so enrollments, deadlines, and assignments remain predictable at scale. Docebo fits teams running ongoing onboarding or role-based training where completion data must drive follow-on assignments and internal compliance reporting.
- +Workflow automation for enrollment, assignments, and learner routing
- +Role-based admin permissions for catalog, users, and reporting control
- +Certification tracking tied to structured learning outcomes
- +Integration options for extending learning into enterprise systems
- –Automation rules require careful governance to avoid unintended enrollments
- –Advanced configuration can increase time to reach stable operations
- –Some custom learning journeys need more setup work than simpler LMS tools
- –Reporting depth may take tuning to match internal definitions
HR and people operations teams
Onboarding with role-based training paths
Faster onboarding compliance tracking
Learning and development teams
Ongoing skills programs for roles
Reduced manual admin work
Show 2 more scenarios
IT and compliance training owners
Audit-ready certification and evidence capture
Clearer compliance reporting
Certification tracking consolidates completion history and supports reporting for internal review workflows.
Training operations managers
ILT scheduling plus self-paced courses
Consistent training delivery
Scheduling and self-paced catalogs can be coordinated inside governed training plans.
Best for: Fits when enterprise training teams need automated assignments and governed learner experiences.
Litmos
enterpriseCorporate training platform for online courses, compliance programs, assessments, and learner management.
Built-in training assignment workflows that manage large learner populations with transcript-based visibility into completion history.
Litmos focuses on assignment-driven delivery for self-paced and blended training programs. SCORM package import and completion tracking cover many standard courseware publishing pipelines. Learner transcripts and reporting emphasize who completed what and when, which fits compliance and onboarding use cases.
Admin workflows focus on managing users, roles, and training assignments without requiring custom integrations for day-to-day training ops. The product includes extensibility hooks for connecting external systems and automating provisioning and learning state synchronization.
Reporting and assessments support operational review of training status and learner completion, which helps training managers run recurring training cycles.
- +SCORM course import supports common packaged training delivery workflows
- +Learner transcript reporting makes completion and history easy to audit
- +Assignment and enrollment workflows fit recurring onboarding and refresher cycles
- +Role-based management reduces admin effort during training rollouts
- –Less granular learning-journey control than LMSs with advanced branching paths
- –Limited visibility into xAPI or LRS delivery when organizations require statement-level handling
- –Advanced governance reporting can require deeper configuration work
- –Third-party integrations depend on available connectors for workflow automation
Best for: Fits when training teams need dependable SCORM delivery and transcript reporting with straightforward admin workflows.
Thinkific Plus
SMBPlatform for building and delivering online courses, training programs, and digital learning experiences.
Thinkific Plus provides governance and administrative workflows designed for managed training programs across multiple teams and org structures.
Thinkific Plus supports computer training delivery with learning paths, assessments, and certification tracking, then adds admin controls aimed at multi-team operations. The Plus tier extends standard course publishing with enterprise-grade governance features, including user provisioning workflows and tighter control over content access.
Automation options include webhooks for event-driven integrations and an API surface for programmatic course, user, and enrollment management. Content handling supports common LMS packaging and playback patterns while keeping the focus on self-paced training and trackable learner progress.
- +Enterprise controls for roles, course permissions, and bulk administration
- +Webhooks and API for tying enrollments and completion events into external systems
- +Strong certification and transcript-style learner history for training programs
- +Flexible learning paths that support structured progression across modules
- –Complex governance takes planning for teams, groups, and content visibility
- –Advanced automation workflows may require custom integration work
- –Some training-specific scenarios need add-ons or extra configuration
- –Reporting depth can lag behind custom BI pipelines for large datasets
Best for: Fits when teams need governed self-paced training delivery plus API and event automation for integrations.
Trainual
SMBTraining and process documentation software for onboarding, SOPs, and employee knowledge transfer.
SOP builder that combines owners, step checklists, and assignment-linked completion for role-based onboarding workflows.
Trainual is a computer training software centered on turning tribal knowledge into guided, searchable process documentation. Teams build interactive SOPs with owners, checklists, and step-level instructions so training stays tied to how work runs day to day.
Admins can assign training to roles and track completion progress across onboarding and recurring refresh cycles. Governance relies on structured templates and review workflows that keep documents consistent as processes change.
- +Role-based training assignments link SOP steps to completion tracking
- +Step-level checklists make recurring work instructions measurable
- +Built-in knowledge repository supports guided process documentation
- +Document ownership and review patterns keep SOPs aligned with operations
- –Limited standards support for SCORM packaging workflows
- –Automation and integrations depend heavily on documented connectors and custom work
- –Complex branching scenarios can become hard to maintain in SOP form
- –Governance requires consistent template use across process authors
Best for: Fits when teams need role-linked SOP training with measurable completion, not SCORM-style course distribution.
Lessonly by Seismic
enterpriseTeam training software focused on practice, coaching, and learning for enablement programs.
Manager coaching assignments connect learning completion to structured follow-up tasks, with tracking visible to program owners.
Lessonly by Seismic is a computer training system focused on manager-led coaching workflows and structured enablement paths. Courses are built with guided activity templates that produce consistent learner experiences across teams.
The system supports assessments, tracked completion, and learner transcript views that tie training to performance outcomes. Admin tooling emphasizes governance through assignment controls, user management, and reporting views for program owners.
- +Activity templates reduce variance across training programs
- +Built-in manager coaching flows support follow-up after learning
- +Completion and transcript reporting supports training governance
- +Assessment options cover both knowledge checks and practice tasks
- –Advanced branching scenarios require manual content design
- –Reporting depth can lag behind specialized L&D analytics tools
- –Complex role mapping can take time to standardize
- –SCORM import capability is not the strongest publishing route
Best for: Fits when enablement teams need manager coaching plus tracked learning completion across many workflows.
ProProfs Training Maker
SMBOnline training software for building courses, quizzes, tests, and certification workflows.
Screen capture lesson authoring tied to graded quizzes and learner progress tracking in a single course workflow.
ProProfs Training Maker is an authoring and delivery tool built for computer training content, with screen-based lesson creation and built-in assessments. Course creation supports quizzes and certification-style tracking, with learner progress stored as part of each course instance.
Content can be packaged for LMS deployment so the training can run outside the authoring workspace. The main differentiator is the combination of lesson authoring, assessment handling, and LMS-friendly publishing within one workflow.
- +Screen capture based lesson authoring speeds up computer training production
- +Built-in quiz creation supports graded questions and feedback at the item level
- +Course publishing supports external LMS deployment workflows
- +Learner progress and completion tracking are included per course
- –Advanced assessment item formats and question banks are limited compared to specialist testing tools
- –Branching scenario complexity depends on course setup rather than a dedicated scenario builder
- –Deep integration options for LRS and xAPI feeds require add-on work
- –Role governance and audit log granularity are not built for fine RBAC models
Best for: Fits when teams need fast computer training authoring with quizzes and external LMS publishing.
SAP Litmos Training
enterpriseOnline training software for course delivery, learner administration, and compliance management.
Certification management tied to assigned learning paths with completion-based status updates.
SAP Litmos Training delivers self-paced courseware creation and delivery through a learning management workflow built for IT, compliance, and skills training. Admins can assign learning paths, manage learner enrollments, and track completion and certification status across cohorts.
The product also supports standards-based packaging so SCORM content can run inside the LMS runtime. Integration-focused customers can connect training to external systems through published APIs and webhook-style events for automation.
- +SCORM package import and tracked completion for standard courseware
- +Course assignments and learning paths fit recurring compliance schedules
- +Certification status tracking supports role-based training checkpoints
- +Integration via API and event exports supports downstream HR reporting
- –Advanced assessment authoring needs more setup than basic quizzes
- –Branching scenario logic is limited compared with dedicated authoring tools
- –Reporting exports require work to standardize across multiple courses
Best for: Fits when organizations need standards-based self-paced training with dependable completion tracking and automation hooks.
LearnUpon
SMBLMS software for employee, customer, and partner education with course delivery and reporting.
Rule-based assignment and enrollment automation that coordinates self-paced courses with scheduled ILT cohorts.
LearnUpon is a computer training LMS built for organizations that need structured onboarding, compliance training, and ongoing certification tracking. It supports self-paced courses, cohort-based instructor-led training, and automated assignments driven by rules.
Admin workflows focus on user enrollment management, curriculum publishing controls, and reporting that ties learning activity to training outcomes. LearnUpon also supports common training content packaging so existing courseware can run inside scheduled and assigned learning paths.
- +Rule-driven course assignment reduces manual scheduling work
- +Clear ILT and self-paced administration for mixed training calendars
- +Good learner and manager reporting for training completion visibility
- +Content import supports common packaged courseware workflows
- –Complex curricula require disciplined configuration to avoid assignment overlap
- –Advanced evaluation workflows feel less granular than specialized assessment tools
- –Some reporting cuts require additional filtering rather than saved views
- –Deep learning analytics depend on packaging and tracking choices
Best for: Fits when training teams need rule-based assignments across self-paced and instructor-led programs.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 education learning, TalentLMS stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right computer training software
This buyer’s guide covers computer training software for self-paced courseware, instructor-led cohorts, and manager-led enablement workflows. It compares TalentLMS, Moodle, Docebo, Litmos, Thinkific Plus, Trainual, Lessonly by Seismic, ProProfs Training Maker, SAP Litmos Training, and LearnUpon.
The guide focuses on integration depth, automation and API surfaces, and governance controls that affect day-to-day administration and reporting. Each tool is mapped to concrete rollout patterns like SCORM delivery, xAPI capture, role-based permissions, and rule-driven enrollment.
Computer training software for delivering packaged courses, assessments, and trackable skill practice
Computer training software delivers interactive learning experiences like self-paced modules, instructor-led cohorts, and manager-led enablement paths. These platforms manage enrollments, publish content, run assessments, and produce learner transcript or progress reports. Many deployments also accept standards-based course packaging and record learning events for transcript-level or statement-level reporting.
TalentLMS supports course assignment workflows plus SCORM import and xAPI learning record capture. Moodle adds deep configuration for role and capability permissions across learning and grading actions, which fits teams that need stricter administration controls.
Evaluation criteria for computer training software in real rollout workflows
Computer training software must fit the operating model that runs training, not just course delivery. The most decisive differences show up in automation triggers, permission granularity, and how learning events turn into transcripts or analytics.
The criteria below align to how TalentLMS, Moodle, Docebo, Litmos, and Thinkific Plus handle assignment rollouts, governance controls, and reporting expectations for skills training.
Standards-based course intake and runtime support
Look for dependable SCORM package import and consistent playback inside the platform workflow. Litmos and SAP Litmos Training both emphasize SCORM delivery with completion and transcript reporting that fits standard corporate courseware.
xAPI statement capture and LRS integration patterns
If learning analytics must report at the event or statement level, the tool needs clear xAPI capture behavior. TalentLMS is built around xAPI statement capture with an LRS integration pattern for detailed learning event reporting, which suits systems that need more than completion timestamps.
Role and capability governance for learning and grading actions
Complex programs need administrators to restrict specific actions across courses, activities, and grading workflows. Moodle’s role and capability permissions cover activity-level access and grading actions, which reduces the need for manual process workarounds during assessment cycles.
Automation that drives enrollment, assignments, and learner journeys
Governed automation prevents manual enrollment errors when learner status changes or recurring programs run. Docebo triggers enrollments, assignments, and learning journeys based on learner events and status changes, which makes it fit enterprise routing and governed learner experiences.
Manager coaching and practice-oriented enablement paths
Enablement programs often need manager-led follow-up that connects completion to structured next steps. Lessonly by Seismic ties manager coaching assignments to learner completion with tracking visible to program owners, which differs from tools built primarily for course delivery.
Screen capture authoring with quiz-linked progress tracking
Teams that produce computer training in-house need fast creation that ties lesson capture to assessments and completion. ProProfs Training Maker uses screen capture based lesson authoring and pairs it with graded quizzes and learner progress tracking within the same course workflow.
Decision framework for picking the right computer training software rollout model
Start by matching the software workflow to the training production and governance model that already exists. Then confirm how assignments get created, how permissions are enforced, and how completion and learning events become reports.
This approach separates platforms built for governed enterprise automation, platforms built for standards-based course delivery with transcripts, and authoring-focused tools that generate computer training quickly.
Choose the delivery model that matches the training calendar
If training runs as scheduled cohorts plus ongoing self-paced courses, LearnUpon coordinates rule-driven course assignments across both ILT and self-paced calendars. If training needs a simpler recurring package delivery and transcript view, Litmos manages training assignments for large populations with transcript-based visibility into completion history.
Match automation depth to enrollment and learner-routing requirements
If learner events must trigger enrollments and routed learning journeys, Docebo applies automation that triggers enrollments, assignments, and learning journeys based on learner status changes. If automation needs are present but centered on bulk assignments and recurring course runs, TalentLMS handles bulk enrollments and completion tracking without requiring external orchestration for every rollout.
Decide how strict governance must be for learning and grading
If administrators must restrict actions at the activity and grading workflow level, Moodle supports role and capability permissions across courses, activities, and grading actions. If governance mostly needs course access control and program management across teams, Thinkific Plus provides governance and administrative workflows for managed training programs across multiple teams and org structures.
Pick the event and reporting granularity required for analytics
For statement-level learning analytics that depends on xAPI, TalentLMS emphasizes xAPI activity collection with an LRS integration pattern for detailed learning events. For teams that mainly need learner transcript and completion history audits, Litmos and SAP Litmos Training focus built-in transcript or completion visibility for compliance and reporting workflows.
Select the authoring workflow that matches content creation speed and format
If training content is primarily SOP process knowledge with step checklists, Trainual builds interactive SOPs with owners, step-level instructions, and assignment-linked completion tracking. If computer training content is produced via screen capture and needs in-tool quizzes, ProProfs Training Maker ties screen capture authoring to graded quiz creation and learner progress tracking in the same course workflow.
Who benefits from computer training software built around trackable rollout workflows
Different teams need different control surfaces. Some need xAPI-level learning event reporting, while others need rule-driven ILT scheduling, manager coaching follow-up, or role and capability permission governance.
The best fit depends on whether training is mainly course packaging and transcripts, or SOP enablement and practice tasks with structured follow-up.
Department-scale training owners who need SCORM delivery plus xAPI event reporting
TalentLMS fits when course assignments run at department scale and existing SCORM content must import cleanly. It also supports xAPI statement capture with an LRS integration pattern when transcript-level reporting is not enough for event analytics.
L&D teams running governed assessment programs with reusable quiz design
Moodle fits when assessment design must be repeatable via reusable question banks and governance must control grading actions. Its role and capability permissions cover activity-level access and grading workflow actions for consistent assessment administration.
Enterprise training groups that must automate enrollment and learning journeys from HR and learner signals
Docebo fits when learner status changes must trigger enrollments, assignments, and learning journeys. It also includes role-based admin permissions across catalog, users, and reporting control for governed learning objects.
IT and compliance training programs that need standards-based courseware running inside an LMS runtime
SAP Litmos Training fits organizations that assign learning paths for self-paced IT and compliance training. It supports SCORM package import with tracked completion and certification status updates tied to assigned learning paths.
Enablement teams that require manager coaching follow-up connected to training completion
Lessonly by Seismic fits manager-led enablement programs where completion must trigger coaching assignments. Its reporting ties learning completion to structured follow-up tasks visible to program owners.
Common rollout pitfalls when choosing computer training software tools
Computer training programs fail when the chosen tool cannot enforce governance consistently or when automation requires engineering effort that the rollout team cannot sustain. Other failures happen when content creation format does not match the authoring workflow the team needs.
The pitfalls below come directly from common cons reported across TalentLMS, Moodle, Docebo, Litmos, Thinkific Plus, Trainual, Lessonly by Seismic, ProProfs Training Maker, SAP Litmos Training, and LearnUpon.
Selecting an LMS without a clear xAPI or transcript strategy
Teams that require statement-level learning analytics often hit integration friction when the tool is focused on transcripts only. TalentLMS provides xAPI statement capture with an LRS integration pattern, while Litmos and SAP Litmos Training center reporting on learner transcripts and completion history.
Designing automation without governance controls for enrollment side effects
When learner events drive enrollments automatically, poorly scoped rules can create unintended assignment outcomes. Docebo automation requires careful governance to avoid unintended enrollments, while TalentLMS can require API-driven external orchestration for complex enterprise automation.
Over-allocating time to fine-grained permissions without planning
Deep permission setups can slow admin onboarding and require plugin governance discipline. Moodle’s capability-level permissions can increase configuration overhead for new administrators, and Thinkific Plus governance can require planning for teams, groups, and content visibility.
Trying to use an authoring tool as a standards-first SCORM course distribution platform
Tools that center process documentation and step checklists may not fit SCORM-heavy content distribution workflows. Trainual has limited standards support for SCORM packaging workflows, while ProProfs Training Maker publishes for external LMS deployment but has limited assessment item formats and question bank capabilities compared with specialist testing tools.
Building complex branching training that exceeds the platform’s scenario tooling
Branching complexity can become hard to maintain when the platform relies on manual course setup rather than dedicated scenario design. Lessonly by Seismic notes that advanced branching scenarios require manual content design, and Litmos and SAP Litmos Training report limited branching scenario logic compared with dedicated authoring tools.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated TalentLMS, Moodle, Docebo, Litmos, Thinkific Plus, Trainual, Lessonly by Seismic, ProProfs Training Maker, SAP Litmos Training, and LearnUpon on features, ease of use, and value. Features carried the most weight in the ranking because the category hinges on practical rollout capabilities like SCORM import, xAPI capture, automation triggers, and permission controls. Ease of use and value each held a smaller share because admin setup time and day-to-day operations matter after implementation.
TalentLMS separated from the lower-ranked set through its xAPI statement capture with an LRS integration pattern paired with strong course assignment and certification tracking workflows. That combination lifted the tool on the features factor and kept the operational burden manageable for teams that need event-level reporting rather than only completion transcripts.
Frequently Asked Questions About computer training software
Which tool is better for SCORM and xAPI learning record reporting in one setup?
When does an LMS need xAPI statements plus an LRS endpoint instead of only SCORM progress?
How do admin provisioning controls differ between Moodle and Thinkific Plus for multi-team training?
How does automation work in Docebo versus LearnUpon when assignment rules depend on learner state?
What breaks if an organization relies on SCORM alone for compliance proof and needs certification-by-path tracking?
Which platform fits manager-led coaching workflows where completion must trigger follow-up tasks?
How do authoring workflows differ between ProProfs Training Maker and Trainual for computer training content?
When should an organization choose Litmos for large-catalog rollout versus Docebo for governed enterprise workflows?
Where does governance control tend to be stronger for capability-level restrictions: Moodle or TalentLMS?
How can teams integrate training outcomes with external systems, and where do Thinkific Plus and SAP Litmos Training differ?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Education Learning alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of education learning tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare education learning tools→